List of Licensed Organisations PDF Created: 28 09 2021
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Area Plan Proposal for London Has Been Developed and in This Booklet You Will Find Information on the Changes Proposed for London
Post Office Ltd Network Change Programme Area Plan Proposal London 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Proposed Local Area Plan 3. The Role of Postwatch 4. List of Post Office® branches proposed for closure 5. List of Post Office® branches proposed to remain in the Network • Frequently Asked Questions Leaflet • Map of the Local Area Plan • Branch Access Reports - information on proposed closing branches and details of alternative branches in the Area 3 4 1. Introduction The Government has recognised that fewer people are using Post Office® branches, partly because traditional services, including benefit payments and other services are now available in other ways, such as online or directly through banks. It has concluded that the overall size and shape of the network of Post Office® branches (“the Network”) needs to change. In May 2007, following a national public consultation, the Government announced a range of proposed measures to modernise and reshape the Network and put it on a more stable footing for the future. A copy of the Government’s response to the national public consultation (“the Response Document”) can be obtained at www.dti.gov.uk/consultations/page36024.html. Post Office Ltd has now put in place a Network Change Programme (“the Programme”) to implement the measures proposed by the Government. The Programme will involve the compulsory compensated closure of up to 2,500 Post Office® branches (out of a current Network of 14,300 branches), with the introduction of about 500 service points known as “Outreaches” to mitigate the impact of the proposed closures. Compensation will be paid to those subpostmasters whose branches are compulsorily closed under the Programme. -
Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 . -
Forenames Surname Relationship Status Marriedfor Gender Age YOB
Forenames Surname Relationship Status MarriedFor Gender Age YOB POB Occupation County Address Parish RegDist Hd No Absalom James YEO Head Married M 35 1876 Okehampton Devon Mason Devonshire White Horse Court Okehampton Devon Esb Missing Okehampton 3 1 Absalom John YEO Son M 5 1906 Okehampton Devon School Devonshire White Horse Court Okehampton Devon Esb Missing Okehampton 3 6 Ada YEO Sister Single F 45 1866 Devon Northam Housekeeper Devonshire Mt Dinham St Davids Exeter Exeter 8 2 Ada YEO Wife Married 17 years F 40 1871 Glamorgan Cardiff Glamorganshire 32 Fairfield Avenue Cardiff Cardiff 14 2 Ada RYDER Servant Widow F 38 1873 Malborough Devon Housemaid Devonshire Welby Tavistock Road Devonport Devonport Devonport 95 5 Ada YEO Wife Married 18 years F 35 1876 London Devonshire 12 Beach Road Hele Ilfracombe Ilfracombe Barnstaple 9 2 Ada YEO Wife Married 6 years F 33 1878 Clovelly Devon Glamorganshire 10 Bishop ST Cardiff Cardiff 15 2 Ada YEO Daughter Married 4 years F 27 1884 Kingston on Thames Surrey 76 Canbury Avenue Kingston‐On Thames Kingston on Thames Kingston 5 4 Ada YEO Daughter Single F 25 1886 London Poplar Clerk Merchant Essex 79 Kingston Road Ilford Ilford Romford 7 4 Ada YEO Daughter Single F 22 1889 London Southwark Sewing Machinist Blouses London 40 Rowfant Road Wandsworth Borough Wandsworth 4 7 Ada DUMMETT Servant Single F 18 1893 Devon Berrynarbor General Servant Domestic Devonshire Wescott Barton Marwood Barnstaple Marwood Barnstaple 740 5 Ada DAVIS Servant Single F 17 1894 Alfreton Derbyshire General Servant Domestic Derbyshire -
Annex F –List of Consultees
ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London -
Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return
London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee Combined Evidence Received:.pdf version Investigation: Overcrowding in London’s Social Rented Housing Contents Organisation Evidence Reference Page Number Number London Borough of Bromley OSRH001 2 Family Mosaic OSRH002 44 East Thames Group OSRH003 46 Affinity Sutton OSRH004 50 Homes and Communities Agency (London) OSRH005 54 South-East London Region OSRH006 60 Hexagon Housing Association OSRH007 62 London Borough of Redbridge OSRH008 66 Kier Partnership Homes OSRH009 87 Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) OSRH010 95 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames OSRH011 99 Citizens Advice OSRH012 103 Notting Hill Housing OSRH013 107 National Housing Federation OSRH014 110 London Borough of Waltham Forest OSRH015 114 Peabody Trust OSRH016 147 London Borough of Croydon OSRH017 153 London Borough of Camden OSRH018 156 G15 Group OSRH019 165 North London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH020 167 City of London OSRH021 172 Genesis Group OSRH022 174 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham OSRH023 179 St George Regeneration OSRH024 188 The Hyde Group OSRH025 190 London Borough of Hounslow OSRH026 194 London Borough of Harrow OSRH027 201 East London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH028 208 London School of Economics (LSE) OSRH029 215 Developers Group OSRH030 218 Amicus Horizon OSRH031 222 CIH (Chartered Institute of Housing) London OSRH032 225 London Borough of Southwark OSRH033 232 West London Region OSRH034 283 London Councils OSRH035 286 London Borough of Merton OSRH036 291 London Borough of Brent OSRH037 -
APPENDIX B the North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny
APPENDIX B The North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee Terms of Reference 1. Membership Membership of the Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC) is one nominated voting member from each participating council, plus one other nominated member to whom the vote can be transferred (on the basis of that member being an elected member of the council they are representing). Alternatively, a Borough can nominate one voting member only. A substitute member can be nominated by the Borough. The vote can also be transferred to the substitute member where he or she is an elected member of the council and the voting member is unavailable. The JHOSC consists of the following authorities: London Borough of Brent London Borough of Ealing London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough of Harrow London Borough of Hounslow Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea London Borough of Richmond City of Westminster 2. Quorum The committee will require at least six members in attendance to be quorate. 3. Chair and Vice Chair The JHOSC will elect its own chair and vice chair. Elections will take place on an annual basis each May, or as soon as practical thereafter, such as to allow for any annual changes to the committee’s membership. The Chair and Vice Chair shall not be members of the same authority or the same political party. 4. Duration It is important the JHOSC operates on the basis of being able to contribute to the effective scrutiny of cross-borough health issues. The JHOSC should provide a forum for cross borough engagement and consultation between its member local authorities, and health service commissioners and providers. -
Harrow Industrial Stories the Local Economy on the Central Industrial Estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories
markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities Harrow Industrial Stories The local economy on the central industrial estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories Study and report by markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities www.markoandplacemakers.com Copyright © Marko and Placemakers and Francis Moss August 2013 Commissioned by Harrow Council Supported by the Mayor’s Outer London Fund Marko and Placemakers Team Francis Moss, Igor Marko, Alejandro Sajgalik, Giulia Toscani, Denizer Ibrahim, Minh Toan Research The data and business profiles in this report are based on observation and information given by individual employees or owners of businesses during visits to Harrow’s central industrial estates in 2013. They are not official statements or data about the businesses. Photographs © Francis Moss Photographs were taken with the permission of the subjects to be included in this report and a potential exhibition. Kodak Archive Photographs © The British Library Board Bird’s-eye photographs © Microsoft Corporation Maps based on Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100019206 Thanks to London Borough of Harrow Mark Billington, Andy Stubbs, David Sklair Greater London Authority Matt Murphy, Tina Jadav, Adam Towle, Mark Brearley Report best viewed as double page spread and printed double sided 2 Harrow Industrial Stories Contents Introduction 4 Context 5 Methodology 7 Categories 8 Overview 10 Estate breakdown 12 Location 14 Suppliers and Customers 15 Employees 16 Size 18 Age 20 Health 21 Estates A1-A4 22 Estates A1-A4 Profiles 24 Estate B1 26 Estate B1 Profiles 28 Estate B2 30 Estate B2 Profile 32 Estates C1-C6 34 Estates C1-C6 Profiles 36 Estates D1-D3 40 Estates D1-D3 Profiles 42 Estates E1-F1 44 Estates E1-F1 Profiles 46 Estates F2-F5 52 Estates F2-F5 Profiles 54 Estate G1 56 Estate G1 Profiles 58 Conclusion 60 Recommendations 62 Business Support 63 3 Harrow Industrial Stories Introduction London’s high streets have been the focus of a lot of recent attention. -
Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date. -
Background Information To
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. About EACH 1.1 Organisational Profile EACH is a voluntary sector organisation with over 26 years’ experience of providing specialist counselling and support services to individuals and family members affected by alcohol and drug misuse, domestic violence and mental health concerns. We operate across West London with centres in Brent, Ealing and Hounslow as well as providing services through outreach based satellites in Hillingdon, Harrow, Kingston- upon-Thames, Richmond, Wandsworth and Merton as part of the London Councils Violence against Women and Girls consortium. EACH’s IPS project has extended our reach into Barnet, Hammersmith and Fulham. EACH provides a range of community based services, with a long history of developing specialist services to meet the needs of Black and Minority Ethnic communities who experience cultural and linguistic barriers to mainstream services. EACH is a company limited by guarantee with charitable status. Established in 1991, the organisation is recognised both locally and nationally for the innovative work it has pioneered in delivering alcohol and mental health services, primarily, in Asian communities in West London. 1.2 EACH’s Reach EACH currently has presence in the boroughs below, along with London boroughs of Richmond upon Thames, Kingston upon Thames, Wandsworth and Merton. The new IPS project will further extend EACH’s reach into Barnet and Hammersmith and Fulham. London Borough of Brent Brent is located in North-west London and is a borough that is culturally diverse with a significant ethnic population of approximately 57%. Information on the borough can be found on the www.brent.gov.uk website. -
This Chart Shows the Ethnicity Profile of Ethnic Minority Groups in NWLH
Profile of Children and Young people accessing Paediatric Speech and Language Therapy services -September 2014 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Harrow’s Overall Population The 2011 National Census indicates that Harrow’s population is one of the most diverse nationally, with 69.1% of residents coming from minority ethnic groups, with the largest group being of Indian ethnicity. The borough also has the largest concentration of Sri Lankan Tamils in the UK as well as having the highest density of Gujarati Hindus in the UK. Harrow is also ranked 8th nationally for linguistic diversity in the Greater London Authority’s Linguistic Diversity Index. At least 88 different languages are “spoken” in Harrow, including three categories of sign language. According to the GLA School Role Projection Service, the increased migration into the borough is projected to continue rising over the next few years. 1.2 Philosophy of our Service The speech and language therapy service at North West London Hospitals NHS Trust provides therapy services to children and young people with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) 0-18 years in a variety of settings working in partnership with colleagues in health, education, social care others and the voluntary sector to promote a comprehensive service to all children and families taking account of cultural and ethnic background. 2.0 Scope of Audit This audit aims to provide data about the population of children and young people in the London Borough of Harrow who were accessing speech and language therapy service in August 2014. It interrogates some of the most salient data sets for CYP with SLCN e.g. -
Minutes of Full Council Meeting Held on Wednesday 6Th March 2019 at 7Pm in the Council Chambers, Market Hall, Holsworthy Present: Councillors J Allen, J, Briggs, J
Minutes of Full Council Meeting held on Wednesday 6th March 2019 at 7pm in the Council Chambers, Market Hall, Holsworthy Present: Councillors J Allen, J, Briggs, J. Heaven, K. Musker, H. Parker, J. Sanders, P. Shepherd, M. Stanton & K Watson. In attendance: Town Clerk (TC) Zoe Uglow Holsworthy Post (Press) TDC Cllr. I. Parker Mr Ian Edwards and Mrs Jaqi Edwards Mayor Cllr. Hutchings was not in attendance at the start of the meeting. As the Council does not have a Deputy Mayor at present Cllr. Allen was elected as Chair. 4129. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Cllr. Hutchings, PCSO Mark James Holsworthy Sector Devon & Cornwall Police, Cllr. Barry Parsons (DCC), ATTC. 4130. DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS Cllr. Hutchings asked Councillors to declare any relevant interests as they arose. The Chairman suspended Standing Orders. 4131. PUBLIC OPEN QUESTION TIME There were no questions asked. 4132. POLICE REPORT (Appendix A) PCSO James sent his apologies prior to the meeting. The Police Report was circulated. Cllr. Watson requested that the Police be asked to provide an update on the recent burglaries at Holsworthy Golf Club, Bude Football Club and in Bodmin. 4133. COUNTY COUNCILLOR’S REPORT (Appendix B) Cllr. Parsons sent his apologises prior to this meeting. The report had been circulated to all. No questions were raised. 4134. DISTRICT COUNCILLORS REPORT Cllr. I. Parker explained that he would not be standing for re-election as a District Councillor at the next election on the 2nd May. Although the District Council’s budgets were stretched for the next financial year, he was pleased to announce that the Councillor’s £2,000 grant ‘pot’ for their communities was still in place. -
West Dorset, Weymouth and Portland Five Year Housing
West Dorset, Weymouth and Portland Five-year housing land supply 2016/17 PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 2017 West Dorset, Weymouth & Portland 5 Year Housing Land Supply 2016/17 Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 2 Housing Supply Requirement .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Local Plan Housing Target ................................................................................ 3 2.2 Performance against Target ............................................................................. 3 2.3 Supply Buffer .................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Factoring in the Shortfall and Buffer ................................................................. 5 2.5 The Five-year requirement position – April 2017 ............................................... 5 2.6 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 5 3 Supply Calculations ............................................................................................. 7 3.2 Recommendations from the Inspector’s Report ............................................... 7 3.3 Recent Appeal Decisions ................................................................................... 8 3.4 Position at April 2017 ........................................................................................ 9 4 Conclusions ......................................................................................................