DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Commission Minutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Commission Minutes Minutes of the Taunton Conservation Commission January 22, 2018 Present: Chair Steven Turner, Vice Chair Debra Botellio, Commissioners Richard Enos, Luis Freitas, Marla Isaac, and Jan Rego. Motion to table the minutes from December until the meeting on 2/12/18, DB, second RE, so voted. Certificate of Compliance 1. 1619 Somerset Ave., Malloch Group, Inc., (COC), SE73-2666 Field report states that this filing was for the proposed construction of a single family home with attached garage, driveway, 12’ x 16’ shed, utilities, and associated grading. An existing shed was razed in the construction process. All work has been completed in significant compliance to the order of conditions which was issued on 8/16/16. The lawn is stable and there is no indication of disturbance into the adjacent wetland area. MR recommends that the TCC issue a COC for this project. Motion to approve, DB, second MI, so voted. 2. 50 Paige Way, Bairos, (COC), SE73-2579 Field report states that this filing was for the construction of a single family home, garage, driveway, utilities, and associated grading within the 100 foot buffer zone of a BVW. All work has been completed in significant compliance to the order of conditions issued on 5/13/14. The lawn is stable and there is no indication of siltation into the wetlands. MR recommends that the TCC issue a COC for this project. Motion to approve, DB, second RE, so voted. Continued Public Hearing 1. Run Brook Circle, Aspen Properties Group, LLC, (ANRAD), SE73-2727 Motion to continue to 2/12/18, DB, second MI, so voted. 2. Massasoit State Park, MA DCR/Straub, (NOI), SE73-2735 Field report states that this filing is for the restoration of Middle Pond to its pre-drawdown conditions by removing vegetation to create a safe swimming environment. In 2009, Middle Pond beach campground was closed and the pond drawn down to discourage public swimming. The drawdown decreased the open water area from 28 acres to 22 acres, and lowered the water elevation from 43 feet to 38 feet. Over time, vegetated wetlands developed in the exposed soils previously part of the land under water (LUW). Vegetation has also grown within the beach area as well. The beach area fell into disrepair due to lack of funding. DCR has received funding to rehabilitate and reopen the Park campground, beach, and pond. The goals are 1) to return Middle Pond and the beach area to its pre- existing (2009) condition as much as possible and 2) manage the process of eutrophication in the Middle Pond to maintain the system as an ecologically valuable open water resource. The DCR proposes to meet these goals in three phases. The first is to remove the existing woody and emergent vegetation and the associated root and rhizome systems within the upper two feet of soil from about a .42-acre area of the former beach. The material removed will be de-watered and re-used in an upland location and clean sand will be placed in the beach location at the original grade. Approximately .39 acres within this area is located within BLSF. Approximately 1,040 cubic yards of material will be removed. The area will be replenished with the same amount of clean sand and graded to original grade. There will be no net change in the volume of material or ground surface elevations within the BLSF or 100 foot buffer zone. No new material will be placed within the BVW or LUW. Second, the flashboards at the Middle Pond dam will be replaced thus restoring the pond to its pre-drawdown conditions. This will raise the water level five feet and expand the surface area approximately 6 acres, from 22 acres to 28 acres. Third, DCR will use a hydro-rake to remove rooted vegetation within and around the former swimming area once the water level returns to historic conditions to ensure a safe environment, free of vegetation, for swimming. Targeted vegetation includes broad-leaf cattail and common reed. The vegetation growth will need to be managed to maintain the beach and swimming area and then transported to an upland area within the park for composting. Future use of the hydro-rake may be necessary to maintain/control the growth of vegetation within the swimming area. The project is projected to take place in the Spring of 2018 and will take approximately four weeks to complete. The construction sequence is as follows: 1) Site access, 2) Establishment of temporary stockpile and dewatering area and erosion/sedimentation controls, 3) excavation of old beach sand from Middle Pond beach, 4) dewatering of excavated material, 5) transportation of dewatered material to location within the park for re-use, 6) replenishment of beach with new, clean sand at the beach, 7) replacement of flashboards, 8) allow pond to return to pre-drawdown levels, 9) hydro-raking vegetation in the vicinity of the swimming beach, and 10) site cleanup and restoration of access points. Siltation barriers and turbidity curtains will be put up along the work area to limit the spread of suspended solids and any turbidity within the adjacent wetland areas. Construction equipment will access the work site via a temporary gravel drive which will trap loose soil from tires and treads. When leaving the site, vehicles will be cleaned of sand and debris. The removed material will be transported from the work footprint and brought to the temporary stockpile and dewatering area. Once dewatered, the material will be transported by dump trucks to the final re-use site within the park. The DCR Office of Dam Safety intends to make minor modifications and repairs to the four Middle Pond Dams, all of which are in poor condition. The dam repair work will be permitted separately from the work described in the project narrative. The project will require review by the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs pursuant to the MEPA, approval by the NHESP, and authorization by the New England District of the USACE under the MAGP in addition to an order of conditions issued by this Commission. MR recommends that the TCC approve this project and issue an order of conditions to include the attached special conditions. Present Alex Paterson. This is a 3 phase project. They will be removing and replacing degraded sand. DB on going project to keep out the growth of the invasive species? They feel with ongoing public use the invasive species should not regrow or at least not very fast. ST questioned if the hydro-raking will hurt any species under water? Not fish, sometimes turtles can get caught up in it but they will have an environmental monitor on site who will monitor for this. The work will begin in the spring, beach and campground set to be open for the season. ST asked if a lifeguard will be on duty at the beach? Alex does believe so. Motion to approve with conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 19, 21, 25, 26, 27, and 28- copy of WQC should be sent into ConComm office to be put in as part of the file, DB, second MI, so voted. 3. 1580 Glebe Street, Faria, (NOI), SE73-2731 Field report 2 states that this project is for the construction of a single family home with attached garage, 16’ x 40’ in-ground pool, grading, septic system, and utilities. The wetlands were delineated by karl Drown on 9/24/17. One wetland, located on an adjacent property, was flagged but the owner removed the flags. A second BVW was flagged along the southwesterly property line, orange flags WF 1 to WF 9. The entire site is also within NHESP Priority Habitat of Rare Species and Estimated Habitat of Rare Wildlife. There have been concerns brought up that the applicant cannot build a house or put in a septic system because they are within a surface water protection area. Nowhere in the regulations does it state that a home cannot be built within this area, nor does it state that a septic system cannot be built, if it meets Board of Health and State setbacks. The Board of Health regulations does not prohibit building a system within this area, but there are restrictions as to the design of the system. This is not in a coastal zone, velocity zone, or regulatory floodway. The site is not within 200 feet of a perennial stream, and no ponds or lakes are in the vicinity. The home will be more than 600 feet from the tributary to the Segreganset River. There was much disagreement over this project and a request for a letter from DEP to clarify the situation resulted in a continuation to the 1/22/18 hearing date. Bruce Bouck from DEP has been out to the site and on 12/13/17 wrote the following (synopsis-entire document is attached): Zone A protection is 400 feet around the actual surface water public water supply but is only 200 feet from any tributary to that surface water supply. In the case of 1580 Glebe Street, Taunton, Bouck states he was out on the site with MR on 11/17/17. Based on that filed visit, Bouck had asked for Karen and Mike to survey elevations along the channel in question to determine the high point. This would indicate the divide where surface water flowed north back into the small pond and south to the stream that eventually flowed into the surface water supply. That divide was provided to me at coordinates N: 2787019.6772’ E: 740430.0468’ with an elevation of 154.573 feet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taunton, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
    MA62-10_2008 MA62-22_2008 MA62-32_2008 Matfield River (5) Satucket River (2) Coweeset Brook (3) 106 West 28 123 MA62-13_2008 Bridgewater Town River (3) Mansfield Easton MA62106_2008 MA62-12_2008 MA62-13_2008 Hockomock River Little Cedar Swamp (3) Town River (3) Town River (3) MA62203_2008 Town Black Brook River Fuller Hammond Ward Pond (3) MA62-35_2008 TownTown RiverRiver Pond Hockomock River (3) MA62134_2008 MA62158_2008 MA62-11_2008 Norton Reservoir (5) Reservoir (3) Town River (3) MA62-27_2008 South Brook 138 South Brook Canoe River (2) MA62-31_2008 Mulberry Meadow Brook (3) Carver Canoe River Pond MA62033_2008 Norton MA62213_2008 Carver Pond (4c) Reservoir Winnecunnet Pond (4c) MA62131_2008 Norton Lake Nippenicket (4c) (TMDL) 140 Bridgewater Winnecunnet MA62-28_2008 Lake 18 Pond Nippenicket MA62-40_2008 Snake River (3) 495 Rumford River Rumford River Rumford River (2) Watson Sawmill Brook SnowsBrook 104 SnowsBrook Pond MA62007_2008 MA62-56_2008 MA62-36_2008 Barrowsville Pond (3) Three Mile River (5) MA62166_2008 MA62088_2008 Sawmill Brook (3) Barrowsville MA62084_2008 MA62205_2008 Lake Sabbatia (5) Hewitt Pond (3) Gushee PondMA62-49_2008 Pond Gushee Pond (4c) Watson Pond (5) Otis Pratt Brook Wading River (5) Meadow Sabbatia Lake Kings Brook Pond Prospect Hill MA62101_2008 Pond Pond MA62228_2008 Mill Kings Pond (3) 24 MA62113_2008 River Johnson Bassett Brook Whittenton Impoundment (4c) Pond Meadow Brook Pond (3) MA62149_2008 Birch Brook Prospect Hill Pond (3) MA62097_2008 Middleborough MA62-56_2008 Three Mile River (5) MA62136_2008
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007 National Park Service 1 Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2007 Prepared by National Park Service, Northeast Region In Cooperation with: » Southeast Region Planning and Economic Development District » Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Project Manager: Jamie Fosburgh, Rivers Program Manager, NER-Boston Poject Team: Bill Napolitano Project Leader, SRPEDD Rachel Calabro Principal Author, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, SRPEDD/ MA Riverways Nancy Durfee Outreach & Volunteers, SRPEDD Karen Porter & Maisy McDarby-Stanovich Mapping & Web Page, SRPEDD Special Thanks: Jim Ross Chair, Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Comments on this Draft Report can be sent to: Jamie Fosburgh National Park Service 15 State Street Boston MA 02109 (617) 223-5191 jamie_fosburgh@nps.gov Please visit www.tauntonriver.org for more information and links related to the Wild and Scenic River Study, Wild and Scenic River Study Committee, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, and the Taunton River. Companion Document: Taunton River Stewardship Plan, July 2005 Cover Photo: Rachel Calabro. Broad Cove, Dighton. Table of Contents Taunton Wild and Scenic Rivers Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2-4 Summary of Findings 5-7 Chapter I. 5 Background and Need 8-14 Chapter II. 8 Eligibility and Classification Findings (The Affected Environment) 15-19 Chapter III. 15 Suitability Findings (Management Context) 20-25 Chapter IV. 20 Identification and Comparison of Alternatives 27-35 Maps 28-29 Study Area Map 30-31 Eligibility and Classification Findings 32-33 Alternative B: Full Designation 34-35 Alternative C: Designation to Steep Brook (N.
    [Show full text]
  • Task 5 Technical Memo, 1St Draft April 7, 2021
    HOLISTIC WATERSHED MANAGEMENT FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES: OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION FOR LOCAL DECISION MAKERS: PHASE 1 – MODELING AND DEVELOPMENT OF FLOW DURATION CURVES (FDC 1 PROJECT) SUPPORT FOR SOUTHEAST NEW ENGLAND PROGRAM (SNEP) COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TASK 5 TECHNICAL MEMO 1ST DRAFT APRIL 7, 2021 Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 1 Prepared by: Paradigm Environmental Great Lakes Environmental Center Blanket Purchase Agreement: BPA-68HE0118A0001-0003 Requisition Number: PR-R1-20-00322 Order: 68HE0121F0001 FDC 1 Project TM 5 April 7, 2021 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Task 5A. Data/Information Assessment .......................................................................................... 1 2.1 Data Review ............................................................................................................................ 1 Landscape Data ............................................................................................................... 1 Dams and Reservoirs ....................................................................................................... 9 Water Use ....................................................................................................................... 9 Meteorology Data ........................................................................................................... 9 Streamflow
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton Large Final
    128 Taunton River Watershed River and Stream Water Quality Status Massachusetts Based on the 2010 assessment by MA DEP for aquatic life, recreation, and fish consumption Locus Water Rockland Walpole Locus Land Stoughton Holbrook Avon Abington S T Hanvoer Sharon r h o u L u m Norfolk Ames o t v B a Long k t Stoughton Abington e r o u t . t S o s Pond a r c B li a sb B c Beaver B. r u . ry r a B e n Wrentham S . v t a a Whitman R Hanson 3 Leach Q l e u . e i i Pembroke s r v Pond e s B e t b B r u B BrocktonC r . R w r o y r o o w u Beaver o P B d Robinson Br. m C k e Brook l a a w e f a i e o s n o n R e r . ME. Bridge- d d o t a e M B H e R R water Stetson r o a i West i . tuc M v t a c k W v w e Easton f S t R r Pond Assawompset k e e o i . a r e o r o d d Bridge- l o Pond a d i m n P e R Monponsett g Mansfield o water i v c M R e Pond Plainville k R r k i y i Kingston v Ocean r o R v e r e o . Halifax r e r R r b u l B ond n P Norton m u nnet w ecu o f n Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Resources and Unique Environments
    Scenic Resources and Unique Environments While, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management’s SCENIC LANDSCAPE INVENTORY does not list any known unique scenic areas in Norton, the Land Preservation Society of Norton has preserved the area known as King Phillip’s Cave. A few glacial erratics (large boulders left by glaciers) are located on Plain Street and are said to have provided shelter to King Phillip during a storm. Scenic Landscapes The following areas were identified as being scenic areas in Norton. Whether hiking, walking, canoeing or just pulling over on the side of the road to eat lunch, residents find these areas the most appealing. Crane farm pond is located on the northerly side of Pine Street nearly opposite Crane Street. The pond is filled with water lilies, turtles and frogs and is home to several ducks and mallards. Dragonflies can been seen flying close to the surface of the water. When the water is high, the whole pond is filled with wildlife and keenly observed by a red- tailed hawk. The Three-Mile River at the Crane Street bridge is an excellent example of the dynamic functions of a river and the adjacent floodplain. In the spring the entire area is filled with water melting from the snow and the spring rains. The water rushes in a wide swath through trees and throughout the wetland area. In the fall, the river is narrowed to a defined channel that meanders and displays its sharp bends. The point-bars and oxbows are clearly observed when the water has receded at this time of year.
    [Show full text]
  • Mill River Dams Feasibility Study River Restoration and Diadromous Fish Passage
    Mill River Dams Feasibility Study River Restoration and Diadromous Fish Passage January 31st, 2008 Prepared for: Massachusetts Riverways Program Riverways Program, DFG 251 Causeway St., Suite 400 Boston, MA 02114 3602 Atwood Avenue Suite 3 Madison, WI 53714 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary........................................................................................................ 5 1.1. State Hospital Dam ................................................................................................ 5 1.2. West Britannia Dam............................................................................................... 8 1.3. Whittenton Pond .................................................................................................... 9 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 13 2.1. Project Team and Scope of Work ........................................................................ 15 2.2. Report Format...................................................................................................... 15 3. Data Collection............................................................................................................. 16 3.1. Existing data ........................................................................................................ 16 3.2. Field data.............................................................................................................. 16 4. Background Information..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstem Taunton River
    MAINSTEM TAUNTON RIVER The Taunton River is formed by the confluence of the Matfield and Town rivers in Bridgewater and follows an approximately 40-mile course to Mount Hope Bay. The Mainstem Taunton River flows through the communities of Bridgewater, Raynham, Taunton, Dighton, Berkley, Fall River, Freetown and Somerset and includes the following four segments (Figure 8): Taunton River (Segment MA62-01) Taunton River (Segment MA62-02) Taunton River (Segment MA62-03) Taunton River (Segment MA62-04) Land along the Mainstem Taunton River is mostly undeveloped with approximately 50% of the land in forest and 25% in residential use. The impervious cover is all less than 10% indicating that there is a low potential for adverse water quality impacts from impervious surface water runoff. Because the watershed topography is flat to low hilly, the Taunton River has one of the flattest courses in Massachusetts. Streamflow fluctuates slowly due to the low gradient; extensive wetland areas and underlying stratified drift. There are only a few short sections of rapids along the river. The absence of dams make it an important anadromous fish run by allowing fish species to reach their native spawning grounds (Nemasket River Stream Team 2003). The Taunton River Stewardship Program, established in 1996 to promote the preservation of the upper Taunton River corridor and its major tributaries as an intact resource, has been instrumental in helping to facilitate land protection efforts along the corridor over the past six years. Thanks to the combined efforts of the Stewardship Program's partners, including the Towns of Bridgewater, Halifax, Middleborough, and Raynham, the City of Taunton, the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, The Wildlands Trust of Southeastern Massachusetts, the Natural Resources Trust of Bridgewater, SRPEDD, and other contributors (notably the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management), 695 acres have been protected in the towns of Bridgewater, Halifax, Middleborough, and Raynham.
    [Show full text]
  • Report FW Flow to NB
    Freshwater Flow to Narragansett Bay An analysis of long-term trends State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Office of Water Resources University of Rhode Island Coastal Institute Prepared by: D. Q. Kellogg, Ph.D., Research Associate IV, University of Rhode Island Acknowledgements The following individuals generously contributed their time and expertise in the preparation of this report: Sue Kiernan (RI DEM), Nicole Rohr (URI CI), Candace Oviatt (URI GSO), Heather Stoffel (URI GSO & RI DEM), Gavino Puggioni (URI Dept. of Statistics), David Vallee (NWS Taunton), and John Mullaney (USGS). The generation of this report was made possible through funding awarded by the United States Environmental Protection Agency through the Healthy Communities Grant Program in association with the Southeast New England Program. Although the information in this document has been funded wholly or part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement 00A00185 to the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, it may not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement should be inferred. April 2018 Cover Image: Map data © 2018 Google i Freshwater Flow to Narragansett Bay: An analysis of long-term trends ABSTRACT Freshwater flow to Narragansett Bay is a key component of bay ecosystem function and has been linked to the development of hypoxia (low dissolved oxygen) in some locations of the bay. Freshwater inputs to Narragansett Bay include contributions from river flow, inputs from wastewater treatment facilities, and precipitation directly on the bay. Among these, river flow dominates, with the three largest river systems being the Blackstone, Pawtuxet and Taunton Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-15 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 1. Southeastern Massachusetts K. E. Reback, P. D. Brady, K. D. McLaughlin, and C. G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Fisheries and Game Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts Technical Report Technical May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-15 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 1. Southeastern Massachusetts Kenneth E. Reback, Phillips D. Brady, Katherine D. McLauglin, and Cheryl G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Southshore Field Station 50A Portside Drive Pocasset, MA January 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Paul Diodati, Director Department of Fisheries and Game Dave Peters, Commissioner Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy-Herztfelder, Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Mitt Romney, Governor TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1: Southeastern Massachusetts Acknowledgements . iii Abstract. iv Introduction . 1 Materials and Methods . 1 Life Histories . 2 Management . 4 Narragansett Bay Drainage . 6 Map of towns and streams . 6 Stream Survey . 7 Narragansett Bay Recommendations . 25 Taunton River Watershed . 26 Map of towns and streams . 26 Stream Survey . 27 Taunton River Recommendations . 76 Buzzards Bay Drainage . 77 Map of towns and streams . 77 Stream Survey . 78 Buzzards Bay Recommendations . 118 General Recommendations . 119 Alphabetical
    [Show full text]
  • IDDE PROGRAM Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program City of Taunton, MA NPDES Small MS4 General Permit
    City of Taunton, MA Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program NPDES Small MS4 General Permit June 2019 IDDE PROGRAM Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program City of Taunton, MA NPDES Small MS4 General Permit IDDE PROGRAM Prepared by: BETA GROUP, INC. Prepared for: City of Taunton June 2019 Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program IDDE Program City of Taunton, MA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Work Completed to Date ................................................................................................................... 3 4.0 Legal Authority and Statement of IDDE Responsibilities ..................................................................... 4 5.0 Receiving Waters and Impairments.................................................................................................... 4 6.0 Prohibitions and Required Actions ..................................................................................................... 7 7.0 Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges .............................................................................................. 7 8.0 Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) ....................................................................................................... 8 9.0
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report I 62Wqar.Doc DWM CN 94.0 Snake River (Segment MA62-28)
    62-AC-1 TAUNTON RIVER WATERSHED 2001 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS STEPHEN R. PRITCHARD, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ROBERT GOLLEDGE JR., COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP’s) home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: · On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); · Microfilmed retained at the State Library; · Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; · Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; · Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; · Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; · Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Bridgewater can apply at their local library for loan of any MA DEP/Division of Watershed Management (DWM) report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 9.54 MB, for Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water
    MATFIELD RIVER SUBWATERSHED The Matfield River and its tributaries drain 77 square miles of the northeast portion of the Taunton River Basin. This subwatershed contains some of the most densely developed areas of the state. The following segments are included in the Matfield River subwatershed (Figure 9): Lovett Brook (Segment MA62-46) Salisbury Brook (Segment MA62-08) Trout Brook (Segment MA62-07) Salisbury Plain River (Segment MA62-05) Salisbury Plain River (Segment MA62-06) Beaver Brook (Segment MA62-09) Meadow Brook (Segment MA62-38) Shumatuscacant River (Segment MA62-33) Poor Meadow Brook (Segment MA62-34) Satucket River (Segment MA62-10) Matfield River (Segment MA62-32) In the northwest section of this subwatershed, Lovett Brook has its headwaters in Brockton and flows south joining Salisbury Brook. Salisbury Brook continues in a southeast direction joining with Trout Brook near downtown Brockton to form the Salisbury Plain River. The Salisbury Plain River flows in a southerly direction through highly urbanized portions of Brockton before heading east to form the Matfield River at its confluence with Beaver Brook in East Bridgewater. Meadow Brook has its origins in Whitman and joins the Matfield River in East Bridgewater. The northeastern section of the Matfield River subwatershed is drained by the 8.5-mile Shumatuscacant River, which runs through the towns of Abington and Whitman and joins Poor Meadow Brook in Hanson. Poor Meadow Brook then flow south westerly to Robbins Pond. The Satucket River originates in Robbins Pond in Bridgewater and meanders in a generally westerly direction before joining the Matfield River in East Bridgewater. The land use in the western portion of the Matfield River subwatershed (Lovett, Salisbury, and Trout Brooks and Salisbury Plain River) is primarily residential followed by forest and some commercial and open space areas.
    [Show full text]