DOCSLIB.ORG

Top 12 Reasons Robert Mueller Is a Trump Hitman to Hide the Deep State’S Sins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

11/9/2017 Americans for Innovation: TOP 12 REASONS ROBERT MUELLER IS A TRUMP HITMAN TO HIDE THE DEEP STATE’S SINS More Next Blog» Create Blog Sign In SEARCH by topic, keyword or phrase. Type in Custom Search box e.g. "IBM Eclipse Foundation" or "racketeering" Custom Search Friday, June 16, 2017 DEEP STATE Member SHADOW TOP 12 REASONS ROBERT MUELLER IS A TRUMP GOVERNMENT HITMAN TO HIDE THE DEEP STATE’S SINS POSTER Harvard | Yale | Stanford Sycophants PRESIDENT TRUMP AND OUR REPUBLIC ARE IN PERIL FROM DEEP Updated Oct. 29, 2017. STATE OPERATIVES LIKE ROBERT S. MUELLER CLICK HERE TO SEE COMBINED TIMELINE OF THE CONTRIBUTING WRITERS | OPINION | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION | JUN. 16, 2016, UPDATED JUN. 26, 2017 | HIJACKING OF THE INTERNET PDF PAY-to-PLA Y NEW W ORLD ORDER This timeline shows how insiders sell access & manipulate politicians, police, intelligence, judges and media to keep their secrets Clintons, Obamas, Summers were paid in cash for outlandish speaking fees and Foundation donations. Sycophant judges, politicians, academics, bureaucrats and media were fed tips to mutual funds tied to insider stocks like Facebook. Risk of public exposure, blackmail, pedophilia, “snuff parties” (ritual child sexual abuse and murder) and Satanism have ensured silence among pay-to-play beneficiaries. The U.S. Patent Office is their toy box from which to steal new ideas. FIG. 1 – ROBERT S. MUELLER. The mainstream media portrays Mueller as a man of "impeccable integrity." This could not be more false. Mueller—along with Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, James Chandler, James Comey and Rod Rosenstein—turned his back on the Republic and the Rule of Law during his 12 years as FBI Director. Photo Jason Reed / Reuters (2011 Senate Intelligence Committee Hearing) / AFI Graphic (JUN. 16, 2017)—Here are 12 reasons why Robert Mueller must be immediately relieved of his duties as Special Counsel in the Russia probe. With the collapse of the "Russians-did-it" fake news narrative, the radical left of Soros-funded Clintonistas are now morphing Mueller's investigation to focus on President Trump’s alleged obstruction of the non-existent Russian story. He was never hired for that, so how is that possible? Who is really running Washington, D.C.? https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2017/06/top-12-reasons-robert-mueller-is-trump.html 1/60 11/9/2017 Americans for Innovation: TOP 12 REASONS ROBERT MUELLER IS A TRUMP HITMAN TO HIDE THE DEEP STATE’S SINS Trump clearly stated his support of investigation of Russian interference. Comey even stated that the President wanted the investigation to be thorough and to include even his "satellite" associates. The level of mental illness among the Clintonistas has become dangerous. The baseball field shooting of Republican members of Congress illustrates this. In law, Comey’s contradictory statements on Trump’s alleged obstruction must be thrown out as false statements since one or the other of his statements is a lie, and therefore, Comey is not a credible witness. Here are 12 reasons why Mueller is profoundly unqualified to be Special Counsel. It is evident that Mueller's real task is to take down his Deep State political enemy: President Donald J. Trump. 1. Mueller became FBI Director on Sep. 04, 2001, just seven days before 9/11. Do you think this is a "coincidence?" 9/11 was a false flag "inside job" according to numerous NSA/C.I.A./FBI whistleblowers like Susan Lindauer, William Binney, Ted Gunderson, Kevin Shiff, James Bamford, Thomas Drake, J. Kirk Wiebe, Colleen Rowley and Robert Steele. (See TIMELINE for the string of Deep State personnel "coincidences" before and after 9/11.) 2. Mueller promoted the Deep State’s abuses of privacy under The Patriot Act; the Deep State used 9/11 as a "false flag" to scare Congress into passing the most massive give away of American constitutional privacy rights in history—this paved the way for the NSA/C.I.A. warrantless surveillance program first exposed by NSA leaker/patriot Edward Snowden 3. Mueller abused the secret, unaccountable FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) Court and Project Stellar Wind to obtain dictatorial warrants on Americans at will. His powers to abuse privacy dwarf any Updated Mar. 19, 2014 such powers that former FBI J. Edgar Hoover used. 4. Protected the Deep State takeover of the Internet. On Sep. 11, 2007, Microsoft started turning over user data to the NSA. On Jun. 03, 2009, Facebook did as well . See Timeline from Edward Snowden's release. CONGRESS CONTACT LOOKUP 5. Exploited NSA blackmail data to retain power—just like his predecessor FBI director J. Edgar Hoover 6. Mueller held exclusive Cayman Island offshore personal investments Universal Toxic Substance Symbol & Warning FINANCIAL HOLDINGS OF OBAMA POLITICAL APPOINTEES, BY AGENCY 7. Wrote a recommendation letter for Pres. Obama's Supreme Court nominee Judge Merrick Garland back in 1995 when Bill Clinton nominated him to be DC circuit judge—Mueller is clearly a Deep State FOLLOW BY EMAIL Democrat operative. Here's is Mueller's Nov. 30, 1995 Garland letter. Email address... Submit 8. Failed to bring forward any prosecutions in: a. Fast & Furious BLOG ARCHIVE ▼ 2017 (22) https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2017/06/top-12-reasons-robert-mueller-is-trump.html 2/60 11/9/2017 Americans for Innovation: TOP 12 REASONS ROBERT MUELLER IS A TRUMP HITMAN TO HIDE THE DEEP STATE’S SINS b. 2008 Banking “bailout” (Wall Street tax dollar feeding frenzy); ► October (1) See 2008 TIMELINE ► September (2) ► August (3) c. Energy stimulus boondoggles ► July (1) ▼ June (3) CISCO IS A KEY ENABLER OF THE DEEP d. IRS targeting of Tea Party STATE SHADOW GO... TOP 12 REASONS ROBERT MUELLER IS A e. The Clinton Foundation's enrichment in the Khazak, UrAsia / TRUMP HITMAN TO... Russian Uraniaum One deal giving away 20% of America's DEEP STATE HIDES ZUCKERBERG’S EVIDENCE OF THE ROGU... uranium reserves to Russia ► May (2) f. Bureau of Land Management land redistributions (to give the ► April (3) Chinese more mining rights) ► March (3) ► February (2) January (2) g. America Invents Act (AIA) corruption that allowed deep-pocket ► globalist companies to file for "patent reexaminations" as many ► 2016 (39) times as they wished, thus tying up real inventors in endless ► 2015 (34) litigation while the globalist companies exploit the inventions ► 2014 (26) with impunity. See AFI. (Nov. 26, 2014). How Judges Grow Rich ► 2013 (28) On The Backs Of American Inventors. ► 2012 (6) h. Theft of Columbus innovator Leader Technologies’ social UPDATE MAR. 25, 2014 networking invention. Failed to investigate Mark Zuckerberg's perjuries on the [IBM Eclipse Foundation] origins of Facebook. FIVE CRITICAL AFI POSTS ON JUDICIAL This is the motivating underlying subject line that triggered the COMPROMISE creation of the AFI TIMELINE that discovered the Deep State shadow government's treachery. Fully updated Mar. 25, 2014 in the wake of the Scribd censorship: i. NSA / C.I.A. warrantless surveillance; see 2001 Project "Stellar 1. HOW PATENT JUDGES GROW Wind" setup, execution RICH ON THE BACKS OF AMERICAN INVENTORS j. Judicial mutual fund bribery rules changes (See AFI. (Nov. 26, Patent Office filings are shuffled out the USPTO backdoor to crony 2014. How Judges Grow Rich On The Backs Of American lawyers, banks and deep-pocket clients. Inventors for an analysis of this scandal. 2. WAS CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS BLACKMAILED into supporting Obamacare by his ethical k. 9/11 C.I.A. inside job compromises in Leader v. Facebook? 3. JUSTICE ROBERTS MENTORED l. Offshore money laundering Facebook Gibson Dunn LLP attorneys. m. Obamacare conflicts of interest fiasco 4. JUSTICE ROBERTS HOLDS substantial Facebook financial interests. n. Allowed Bilderberg Group sedition 5. JUDGE LEONARD STARK FAILED to disclose his Facebook financial o. Allowed Davos World Economic Forum sedition interests and his reliance on Facebook's Cooley Godward LLP attorneys for his appointment. p. Allowed Trilateral Commission sedition q. Allowed U.N. Commission sedition BARACK OBAMA'S DARK POOLS r. Allowed George Soros Open Society Foundations (Soros) sedition. OF CORRUPTION See also AFI. (Aug. 21, 2016). George Soros: The epic global meddler. Americans for Innovation. https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com/2017/06/top-12-reasons-robert-mueller-is-trump.html 3/60 11/9/2017 Americans for Innovation: TOP 12 REASONS ROBERT MUELLER IS A TRUMP HITMAN TO HIDE THE DEEP STATE’S SINS s. Allowed The Clinton Foundation sedition Click to enlarge t. Allowed Federal Reserve sedition 9. Mueller's Net Worth increased from $1.8M (2001) to up to $7.0M (2011) on an FBI director salary! This period includes the disastrous 2008- 2009 crisis and drop in the stock markets. 10. His former Harvard professor Benjamin M. Friedman is director of one of his super exclusive Cayman Island offshore investments Mellon Optima L/S (long/short) Strategy Fund LLC, N-CSR CLICK HERE FOR WASHINGTON'S ETHICAL DISEASE DISCOVERIES RE. FACEBOOK "DARK 11. Mueller has more than 20 years of conflicts of interest with Rod J. POOLS" Rosenstein, James B. Comey and Clintons. See numerous previous posts, search "Comey" "Mueller" and "Rosenstein". STOP FACEBOOK PROPERTY THEFT 12. Failed to prosecute rampant rogue C.I.A.-run global pedophilia blackmail rings. Since our elected leaders in Washington, D.C. seem incapable of draining the swamp of people like Mueller, We the People are going to have to do it. W LL HUMANK ND EVER LEARN? Facebook's Orwellian Washington's impotence was affirmed this morning by Congressman Jason doublespeak about property and privacy (theft) merely Chaffetz, who said he is leaving Congress because neither Republicans nor repeats the eventual dehumanization of the individual under MAO's Red Star, Stalin's SOV ET Hammer & Cycle and Hitler's Democrats want to change anything.
Recommended publications
  • June 11, 2021 the Honorable Xavier Becerra Secretary Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Ave S.W. Washingto

    June 11, 2021 the Honorable Xavier Becerra Secretary Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Ave S.W. Washingto

    June 11, 2021 The Honorable Xavier Becerra Secretary Department of Health and Human Services 200 Independence Ave S.W. Washington, D.C. 20201 The Honorable Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D. Director National Institutes of Health 9000 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20892 Dear Secretary Becerra and Director Collins, Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 2954 we, as members of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, write to request documents regarding the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The recent release of approximately 4,000 pages of NIH email communications and other documents from early 2020 has raised serious questions about NIH’s handling of COVID-19. Between June 1and June 4, 2021, the news media and public interest groups released approximately 4,000 pages of NIH emails and other documents these organizations received pursuant to Freedom of Information Act requests.1 These documents, though heavily redacted, have shed new light on NIH’s awareness of the virus’ origins in the early stages of the COVID- 19 pandemic. In a January 9, 2020 email, Dr. David Morens, Senior Scientific Advisor to Dr. Fauci, emailed Dr. Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance, asking for “any inside info on this new coronavirus that isn’t yet in the public domain[.]”2 In a January 27, 2020 reply, Dr. Daszak emailed Dr. Morens, with the subject line: “Wuhan novel coronavirus – NIAID’s role in bat-origin Covs” and stated: 1 See Damian Paletta and Yasmeen Abutaleb, Anthony Fauci’s pandemic emails:
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2010

    The Public Eye, Summer 2010

    Right-Wing Co-Opts Civil Rights Movement History, p. 3 TheA PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL R PublicEyeESEARCH ASSOCIATES Summer 2010 • Volume XXV, No.2 Basta Dobbs! Last year, a coalition of Latino/a groups suc - cessfully fought to remove anti-immigrant pundit Lou Dobbs from CNN. Political Research Associates Executive DirectorTarso Luís Ramos spoke to Presente.org co-founder Roberto Lovato to find out how they did it. Tarso Luís Ramos: Tell me about your organization, Presente.org. Roberto Lovato: Presente.org, founded in MaY 2009, is the preeminent online Latino adVocacY organiZation. It’s kind of like a MoVeOn.org for Latinos: its goal is to build Latino poWer through online and offline organiZing. Presente started With a campaign to persuade GoVernor EdWard Rendell of PennsYlVania to take a stand against the Verdict in the case of Luis RamíreZ, an undocumented immigrant t t e Who Was killed in Shenandoah, PennsYl - k n u l Vania, and Whose assailants Were acquitted P k c a J bY an all-White jurY. We also ran a campaign / o t o to support the nomination of Sonia h P P SotomaYor to the Supreme Court—We A Students rally at a State Board of Education meeting, Austin, Texas, March 10, 2010 produced an “I Stand With SotomaYor” logo and poster that people could displaY at Work or in their neighborhoods and post on their Facebook pages—and a feW addi - From Schoolhouse to Statehouse tional, smaller campaigns, but reallY the Curriculum from a Christian Nationalist Worldview Basta Dobbs! continues on page 12 By Rachel Tabachnick TheTexas Curriculum IN THIS ISSUE Controversy objectiVe is present—a Christian land goV - 1 Editorial .
  • A Legal Proceeding Against Two Notorious Conspiracy Theorists Over

    A Legal Proceeding Against Two Notorious Conspiracy Theorists Over

    Case 1:20-cv-08668-VM Document 102 Filed 05/19/21 Page 1 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NATIONAL COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION, MARY WINTER, GENE STEINBERG, NANCY HART, SARAH WOLFF, KAREN SLAVEN, KATE KENNEDY, EDA DANIEL, and ANDREA SFERES, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-08668 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION -and- People of the STATE OF NEW YORK, by its attorney general, LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. JACOB WOHL, JACK BURKMAN, J.M. BURKMAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC, PROJECT 1599, MESSAGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and ROBERT MAHANIAN Defendants. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. All eligible voters have the right to vote unimpeded by deception or intimidation. The right to vote “in a free and unimpaired manner is preservative of other basic civil and political rights” and “any alleged infringement of the right of citizens to vote must be carefully and meticulously scrutinized.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 562 (1964). 1 Case 1:20-cv-08668-VM Document 102 Filed 05/19/21 Page 2 of 28 2. This case is about a targeted, discriminatory effort to infringe on the fundamental rights of New Yorkers—and others across the country—to vote in a safe, lawful manner. Jacob Wohl and Jack Burkman, through Burkman’s lobbying firm, J.M. Burkman & Associates, and the purported organization Project 1599 (collectively “Wohl and Burkman”), concocted a racist campaign that trafficked in stereotypes and spread lies and deception all for their shared goal of intimidating voters and depressing voter turnout to disrupt a presidential election.
  • The Breadth of Congress' Authority to Access Information in Our Scheme

    The Breadth of Congress' Authority to Access Information in Our Scheme

    H H H H H H H H H H H 5. The Breadth of Congress’s Authority to Access Information in Our Scheme of Separated Powers Overview Congress’s broad investigatory powers are constrained both by the structural limitations imposed by our constitutional system of separated and balanced powers and by the individual rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Thus, the president, subordinate officials, and individuals called as witnesses can assert various privileges, which enable them to resist or limit the scope of congressional inquiries. These privileges, however, are also limited. The Supreme Court has recognized the president’s constitutionally based privilege to protect the confidentiality of documents or other information that reflects presidential decision-making and deliberations. This presidential executive privilege, however, is qualified. Congress and other appropriate investigative entities may overcome the privilege by a sufficient showing of need and the inability to obtain the information elsewhere. Moreover, neither the Constitution nor the courts have provided a special exemption protecting the confidentiality of national security or foreign affairs information. But self-imposed congressional constraints on information access in these sensitive areas have raised serious institutional and practical concerns as to the current effectiveness of oversight of executive actions in these areas. With regard to individual rights, the Supreme Court has recognized that individuals subject to congressional inquiries are protected by the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, though in many important respects those rights may be qualified by Congress’s constitutionally rooted investigatory authority. A. Executive Privilege Executive privilege is a doctrine that enables the president to withhold certain information from disclosure to the public or even Congress.
  • R R R ---R R R R R R R R R R R R R

    R R R ---R R R R R R R R R R R R R

    Obtained via FOIA by Judicial Watch, Inc. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 November 29, 2019 MR. WILLIAM F MARSHALL JUDICIAL WATCH SUITE 800 425 THIRD STREET, SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON, DC 20024 FOIPA Request No.: 1391365-000 Civil Action No.: 18-cv-154 Subject: Communications between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page (February 1, 2015 – Present) Dear Mr. Marshall: The enclosed documents were reviewed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Title 5, United States Code, Section 552. Below you will find check boxes under the appropriate statue headings with indicate the types of exemptions asserted to protect information which is exempt from disclosure. The appropriate exemptions are noted on the enclosed pages next to redacted information. In addition, a deleted page information sheet was inserted to indicate where pages were withheld entirely and identify which exemptions were applied. The checked exemption boxes used to withhold information are further explained in the enclosed Explanation of Exemptions. Section 552 Section 552a r (b)(1) r (b)(7)(A) r (d)(5) r (b)(2) r (b)(7)(B) r (j)(2) r (b)(3) P' (b)(7)(C) r (k)(1) -------- P' (b)(7)(D) r (k)(2) (b)(7)(E) (k)(3) -------- P' r -------- r (b)(7)(F) r (k)(4) (b)(4) r (b)(8) r (k)(5) (b)(5) r (b)(9) r (k)(6) (b)(6) r (k)(7) 500 pages of potentially responsive records were reviewed. 171 pages are being released in whole or in part. 2 pages are being withheld in full per exemptions.
  • Congressional Record—Senate S924

    Congressional Record—Senate S924

    S924 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE March 1, 2021 unanimous consent that the rules of in the subcommittee and shall not be count- IMPEACHMENT procedure of the Committee on Appro- ed for purposes of determining a quorum. Mr. GRASSLEY. Mr. President, just priations for the 117th Congress be f barely a year ago, I was here making a printed in the RECORD. similar statement. Impeachment is one There being no objection, the mate- TRIBUTE TO CHRISTINA NOLAN of the most solemn matters to come rial was ordered to be printed in the Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I would before the Senate, but I worry that it’s RECORD, as follows: like to pay tribute to a great also becoming a common occurrence. SENATE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Before getting into the merits of this Vermonter, Christina Nolan, a most COMMITTEE RULES—117TH CONGRESS impeachment, it is important to reit- dedicated public servant who has I. MEETINGS erate that January 6 was a sad and served as U.S. attorney for the District tragic day for America. I hope we can The Committee will meet at the call of the of Vermont since November 2017. She Chairman. all agree about that. will be resigning her post at the end of What happened here at the Capitol II. QUORUMS this month, 11 years since she first 1. Reporting a bill. A majority of the mem- was completely inexcusable. It was not joined the U.S. Attorney’s Office, but a demonstration of any of our pro- bers must be present for the reporting of a her work and the strong partnerships bill.
  • (Pdf) Download

    (Pdf) Download

    NATIONAL & LOCAL NEWS MEDIA TV, RADIO, PRINT & ONLINE SOURCES Master List - Updated 04/2019 Pain Warriors Unite Washington Post: Website: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/submit-an-op-ed/?utm_term=.d1efbe184dbb What are the guidelines for letter submissions? Email: [email protected] We prefer letters that are fewer than 200 words and take as their starting point an article or other item appearing in The Post. They may not have been submitted to, posted to or published by any other media. They must include the writer's full name; anonymous letters and letters written under pseudonyms will not be considered. For verification purposes, they must also include the writer's home address, email address and telephone numbers, including a daytime telephone number. Writers should disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject matter of their letters. If sending email, please put the text of the letter in the body and do not send attachments; attachments will not be read. What are the guidelines for op-ed submissions? Submissions should be limited to 800 words. We consider only completed articles and cannot commit to, or provide guidance on, article proposals. Op-eds may not have been submitted to, posted to or published by any other media. They must include the writer's full name — anonymous op-eds or op-eds written under pseudonyms will not be considered. They also must include the writer's home address, email address and telephone numbers. Additionally, we ask that writers disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject at hand. Please use our op-ed submission form L.A.
  • August 18, 2020 VIA FOIA ONLINE Kevin Krebs Assistant Director FOIA

    August 18, 2020 VIA FOIA ONLINE Kevin Krebs Assistant Director FOIA

    August 18, 2020 VIA FOIA ONLINE Kevin Krebs Assistant Director FOIA/Privacy Unit Executive Office for United States Attorneys Department of Justice 175 N Street NE, Suite 5.400 Washington, DC 20530-0001 Via FOIA Online Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear FOIA Officer: Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the implementing regulations of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), 28 C.F.R. Part 16, American Oversight makes the following request for records. In May 2020, Attorney General William Barr tapped U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Texas John Bash to investigate “unmasking” practices—i.e., the intelligence community practice of revealing of the identity of an individual on a monitored communication—occurring before and after the 2016 presidential election.1 The move is part of a broader DOJ investigation into unmasking, which has raised concerns about political motivations within the DOJ.2 American Oversight seeks records with potential to shed light on Mr. Bash’s actions. Requested Records American Oversight requests that your agency produce the following records within twenty business days: 1 Quint Forgey, Barr Taps U.S. Attorney to Investigate ‘Unmasking’ as Part of Russian Probe Review, Politico (May 28, 2020, 9:25 AM), https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/28/barr-russia-probe-attorney-286920. 2 See, e.g., Mark Hosenball, Former U.S. Officials Question DOJ’s Probe of ‘Unmasking’ of Trump Ally, Reuters (May 29, 2020, 6:08 AM), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- intelligence-unmasking/former-u-s-officials-question-dojs-probe-of-unmasking-of-trump- ally-idUSKBN23519Q.
  • COMPLAINT Page 1 of 27 Juan C. Chavez, OSB #136428 Franz Bruggemeier, OSB #163533 Alex Meggitt, OSB #174131 Oregon Justice Resou

    COMPLAINT Page 1 of 27 Juan C. Chavez, OSB #136428 Franz Bruggemeier, OSB #163533 Alex Meggitt, OSB #174131 Oregon Justice Resou

    Case 3:21-cv-00561-YY Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 1 of 27 Juan C. Chavez, OSB #136428 Franz Bruggemeier, OSB #163533 Alex Meggitt, OSB #174131 Oregon Justice Resource Center PO Box 5248 Portland, OR 97208 Telephone: 503-944-2270 Facsimile: 971-275-1839 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION HANNAH AHERN, Case No. 3:21-cv-00561 Plaintiff, v. COMPLAINT ERIK KAMMERER, CITY OF PORTLAND; Civil Rights Action (42 U.S.C. § 1983); False and JOHN DOES 1-5. Arrest and Battery (State Tort) Defendants. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Ms. Hannah Ahern, Plaintiff, initiates this suit because Defendants unlawfully detained her at a counter-demonstration against white supremacist groups that were using the City of Portland as a staging ground for recruitment and later attacks on other cities. Detective Erik Kammerer, Defendant, fabricated evidence to effectuate an arrest of Ms. Ahern after she spat in the general direction of an approaching van of riot police. Video evidence shows that Defendant Kammerer knew that he did not have probable cause; he merely wanted to punish Ms. Ahern for showing contempt for the riot police. This is in keeping a pattern and practice of the City of Portland, COMPLAINT Page 1 of 27 Case 3:21-cv-00561-YY Document 1 Filed 04/14/21 Page 2 of 27 Defendant, of punishing groups that express sentiments in support of police accountability or against white supremacy, JURISDICTION 1. This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Complaint under 42 U.S.C.
  • Conservative Website Parler Forced Offline: Web Trackers 11 January 2021

    Conservative Website Parler Forced Offline: Web Trackers 11 January 2021

    Conservative website Parler forced offline: web trackers 11 January 2021 In a letter to Parler's owners, the web giant said it would suspend service by 11:59 PM on Sunday (0759 GMT Monday). Tracking website Down For Everyone Or Just Me showed Parler offline from just after midnight, suggesting its owners had not been able to find a new hosting partner. In a series of posts on Parler before the site went down, CEO John Matze accused the tech giants of a "war on free speech." "They will NOT win! We are the worlds last hope for free speech and free information," he said. The conservative social network Parler was forced offline, tracking websites showed, a day after Amazon Parler did not respond to a request for comment warned the company would lose access to its servers for from AFP. its failure to properly police violent content The social network, launched in 2018, operates much like Twitter, with profiles to follow and "parleys" instead of tweets. The conservative social network Parler was forced offline Monday, tracking websites showed, after In its early days, the platform attracted a crowd of Amazon warned the company would lose access ultra-conservative and even extreme-right users. to its servers for its failure to properly police violent content. But it now attracts many more traditional Republican voices. The site's popularity soared in recent weeks, becoming the number one download from Apple's Fox News star host Sean Hannity has 7.6 million App Store after the much larger Twitter banned US followers, while his colleague Tucker Carlson has President Donald Trump from its platform for his 4.4 million.
  • © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang

    © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang

    © Copyright 2020 Yunkang Yang The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2020 Reading Committee: W. Lance Bennett, Chair Matthew J. Powers Kirsten A. Foot Adrienne Russell Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Communication University of Washington Abstract The Political Logic of the Radical Right Media Sphere in the United States Yunkang Yang Chair of the Supervisory Committee: W. Lance Bennett Department of Communication Democracy in America is threatened by an increased level of false information circulating through online media networks. Previous research has found that radical right media such as Fox News and Breitbart are the principal incubators and distributors of online disinformation. In this dissertation, I draw attention to their political mobilizing logic and propose a new theoretical framework to analyze major radical right media in the U.S. Contrasted with the old partisan media literature that regarded radical right media as partisan news organizations, I argue that media outlets such as Fox News and Breitbart are better understood as hybrid network organizations. This means that many radical right media can function as partisan journalism producers, disinformation distributors, and in many cases political organizations at the same time. They not only provide partisan news reporting but also engage in a variety of political activities such as spreading disinformation, conducting opposition research, contacting voters, and campaigning and fundraising for politicians. In addition, many radical right media are also capable of forming emerging political organization networks that can mobilize resources, coordinate actions, and pursue tangible political goals at strategic moments in response to the changing political environment.
  • “We Are Coming for You Globalists!”

    “We Are Coming for You Globalists!”

    “We Are Coming For You Globalists!” Rhetorical Strategies of Online Conspiracy Communities in the USA ID: 1754351 SUPERVISOR: Dr. G.M. van Buuren NAME: Philipp Blaas SECOND READER: Prof. Dr. E. Bakker WORDS: 26.998 PROGRAM: MSc Crisis and Security Management DATE: June 8th, 2017 1 Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Defining Conspiracy ............................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Reality is Just a Matter of Perspective .................................................................................... 8 2.2.1. Social Constructivism ......................................................................................................... 9 2.2.2. Language versus Power in Political Discourse ................................................................. 10 2.3. The Threatening Other .......................................................................................................... 11 2.4. The Heroic ‘Us’ and the Evil ‘Them’ ................................................................................... 13 2.5. Rhetorical Strategies ............................................................................................................. 15 2.6. Populism: The Little Brother of Conspiracy