Effect of Material Nonlinearity on Rubber Friction a Thesis Presented

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effect of Material Nonlinearity on Rubber Friction a Thesis Presented Effect of Material Nonlinearity on Rubber Friction A thesis presented to the faculty of the Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Tejas N. Bhave December 2016 © 2016 Tejas N. Bhave. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Effect of Material Nonlinearity on Rubber Friction by TEJAS N. BHAVE has been approved for the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Russ College of Engineering and Technology by Alireza Sarvestani Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dennis Irwin Dean, Russ College of Engineering and Technology 3 ABSTRACT BHAVE, TEJAS N., M.S., December 2016, Mechanical Engineering Effect of Material Nonlinearity on Rubber Friction Director of thesis: Alireza Sarvestani With the increase in the importance of vehicular transportation, the study of contact patch parameters including the contact patch forces and the tire-road friction has become essential from the perspective of improving vehicle safety as well as vehicle performance. The current work aims at analyzing the effect of the nonlinear elastic and nonlinear viscoelastic nature of tire tread rubber by modifying two commonly used rubber friction models (Gim’s analytical model and Heinrich-Klüppel (HK) friction model) in order to implement the nonlinear elasticity and the nonlinear viscoelasticity of rubber. Gim’s analytical model is modified by changing the linear elastic constitutive equation used in the original model to a nonlinear elastic equation based on the strain energy density of rubber. Results are obtained for a test simulation using this modified model and an experimental method is proposed to validate the modified model’s force predictions. The HK friction model computes the hysteretic sliding friction coefficient of rubber based on the viscoelastic modulus. It however, does not consider the (experimentally proven) dependence of viscoelastic modulus of rubber on the applied strain amplitude and temperature. The current work thus aims at implementing this dependence and modifying the classical HK friction model. A test simulation run for a rubber block sliding on a rough surface using the modified HK friction model yielded friction results that are sensitive to the input strain amplitude and temperature. 4 DEDICATION Dedicated to my family 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my thesis advisor Dr. Alireza Sarvestani for his able guidance, sound advice (both technical and worldly) and unwavering support during this two-year journey that was my thesis research. It was the balance that he struck between allowing me to work independently and monitoring and helping me whenever I was stranded, that helped me develop not only as a researcher, but also as an engineering professional. I was able to achieve more in my academic life here at Ohio University than I could have ever imagined thanks to his support and encouragement. I would also like to thank my thesis committee members Dr. John Cotton, Dr. Munir Nazzal and Dr. Ardalan Vahidi for their valuable advice regarding my research work. Their technical expertise, help, advice and suggestions has helped me shape my research work. Furthermore, I would like to thank my lab colleagues, Mohammad Jafari Tehrani and Mohammad Hossein Moshaei for their support, encouragement and help during the course of my research. Thanks are due to Mayur, Manish, Shantanu, Pratik, Amit, Ajinkya, Aditya, Aniruddha, Cody, John, Brian McCoy and the Petitt family for all their help and support. I would also like to thank everybody, who in any way, has offered their help, support, guidance or advice throughout this process. Most importantly, I would like to thank my family and especially my parents. The daily conversations with them helped me tide over some difficult times. If it were not for their endless affection and support, at all levels, I am sure I would not have progressed to where I stand on this day. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 3 Dedication ........................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... 5 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 8 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... 9 1 Research Background ............................................................................................... 11 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 14 2.1 The Tire ................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Introduction to Tread Rubber.................................................................................. 15 2.3 Properties of Tread Rubber ..................................................................................... 16 2.4 Contact Patch in Tires ............................................................................................. 19 3 Tire Road Interaction Models ................................................................................... 22 3.1 Introduction and Classification ............................................................................... 22 3.2 Brush Model Method .............................................................................................. 24 3.3 Improvements in the Classical Brush Model .......................................................... 26 3.3.1 Combined Slips ................................................................................................ 26 3.3.2 Pressure Distribution in the Contact Patch ...................................................... 28 3.3.3 Velocity-Dependent Coefficient of Friction .................................................... 30 3.3.4 Pressure Dependent Coefficient of Friction ..................................................... 32 3.3.5 The TreadSim Model ....................................................................................... 33 3.3.6 Applications of the Brush Model Method ....................................................... 34 3.4 Thesis Objective...................................................................................................... 35 4 Non Linear Elasticity of Rubber ............................................................................... 37 4.1 Expression for Material Nonlinearity of Rubber .................................................... 37 4.2 Friction Force Predictions Using Modified Brush Model Method ......................... 42 4.2.1 Longitudinal Force Prediction Using the Modified Brush Model Method ...... 42 4.2.2 Implementing Nonlinearity into Lateral Force Calculations ........................... 48 4.3 Proposed Method to Validate Modified Brush Model ............................................ 53 5 Effect of Tread Rubber Viscoelasticity on Tire Friction .......................................... 55 5.1 Adhesive and Hysteretic Friction............................................................................ 55 7 5.2 Introduction to Viscoelasticity ................................................................................ 56 5.3 Rubber Viscoelasticity and Hysteresis Friction ...................................................... 59 5.4 Classical HK Friction Model .................................................................................. 61 5.5 The Payne Effect ..................................................................................................... 63 5.6 Modified HK Model with Payne Effect .................................................................. 65 5.7 Temperature Dependent Rubber Viscoelasticity .................................................... 70 5.8 Strain Amplitude and Flash Temperature Dependent Modified HK Model ........... 73 6 Summary and Conclusions ....................................................................................... 76 References ......................................................................................................................... 79 Appendix: Supplemental Files .......................................................................................... 85 8 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Input Parameters for Prediction of Longitudinal Force Using the Modified Brush Model Method ................................................................................................................... 44 Table 2: Input Parameters for Calculating the Lateral Force Due To Slip Angle Using the Modified Brush Model Method ........................................................................................ 50 Table 3: Input Parameters for Calculating the Lateral Force Due To Camber Angle Using the Modified Brush Model Method .................................................................................. 51 9 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 2.1 Nonlinear Stress-Strain Curve for Rubber ...................................................... 17 Figure 2.2 Stress Strain Curve for Viscoelastic Material ................................................. 18 Figure 2.3 Tire Contact Patch ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • MICHELIN® X® TWEEL® TURF™ the Airless Radial Tire™ & Wheel Assembly
    MICHELIN® X® TWEEL® TURF™ The Airless Radial Tire™ & wheel assembly. Designed for use on zero turn radius mowers. ✓ NO MAINTENANCE ✓ NO COMPROMISE ✓ NO DOWNTIME MICHELIN® X® TWEEL® TURF™ No Maintenance – MICHELIN® X® TWEEL® TURF™ is one single unit, replacing the current tire/wheel/valve assembly. Once they are bolted on, there is no air pressure to maintain, and the common problem of unseated beads is completely eliminated. No Compromise – MICHELIN X TWEEL TURF has a consistent hub height which ensures the mower deck produces an even cut, while the full-width poly-resin spokes provide excellent lateral stability for outstanding side hill performance. The unique design of the spokes helps dampen the ride for enhanced operator comfort, even when navigating over curbs and other bumps. High performance compounds and an effi cient contact patch offer a long wear life that is two to three times that of a pneumatic tire at equal tread depth. No Downtime – MICHELIN X TWEEL TURF performs like a pneumatic tire, but without the risk and costly downtime associated with fl at tires and unseated beads. Zero degree belts and proprietary design provide great lateral stiffness, while resisting damage Multi-directional and absorbing impacts. tread pattern is optimized to provide excellent side hill stability and prevent turf High strength, damage. poly-resin spokes carry the load and absorb impacts, while damping the ride and providing a unique energy transfer that Michelin’s reduces “bounce.” proprietary Comp10 Cable™ forms a semi-rigid “shear beam”, Heavy gauge and allows the steel with 4 bolt load to hang hub pattern fi ts from the top.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHELIN Truck Tires Service Manual
    MICHELIN MICHELIN® Truck Tire ® TRUCK TIRE SERVICE MANUAL SERVICE TIRE TRUCK Service Manual MICHELIN® Truck Tire Service Manual To learn more please contact your MICHELIN Sales Representative or visit www.michelintruck.com To order more books, please call Promotional Fulfillment Center 1-800-677-3322, Option #2 Monday through Friday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Time United States Michelin North America, Inc. One Parkway South Greenville, SC • 29615 1-888-622-2306 Canada Michelin North America (Canada), Inc. 2500 Daniel Johnson, Suite 500 Laval, Quebec H7T 2P6 1-888-871-4444 Mexico Industrias Michelin, S.A. de C.V. Av. 5 de febrero No. 2113-A Fracc. Industrial Benito Juarez 7 6120, Querétaro, Qro. Mexico 011 52 442 296 1600 An Equal Opportunity Employer Copyright © 2011 Michelin North America, Inc. All rights reserved. The Michelin Man is a registered trademark owned by Michelin North America, Inc. MICHELIN® tires and tubes are subject to a continuous development program. Michelin North America, Inc. reserves the right to change product specifications at any time without notice or obligations. MWL40732 (05/11) Introduction Read this manual carefully — it is important for the SAFE operation and servicing of your tires. Michelin is dedicated and committed to the promotion of Safe Practices in the care and handling of all tires. This manual is in full compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 1910.177 relative to the handling of single and multi-piece wheels. The purpose of this manual is to provide the MICHELIN® Truck Tire customer with useful information to help obtain maximum performance at minimum cost per mile.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyre Dynamics, Tyre As a Vehicle Component Part 1.: Tyre Handling Performance
    1 Tyre dynamics, tyre as a vehicle component Part 1.: Tyre handling performance Virtual Education in Rubber Technology (VERT), FI-04-B-F-PP-160531 Joop P. Pauwelussen, Wouter Dalhuijsen, Menno Merts HAN University October 16, 2007 2 Table of contents 1. General 1.1 Effect of tyre ply design 1.2 Tyre variables and tyre performance 1.3 Road surface parameters 1.4 Tyre input and output quantities. 1.4.1 The effective rolling radius 2. The rolling tyre. 3. The tyre under braking or driving conditions. 3.1 Practical brakeslip 3.2 Longitudinal slip characteristics. 3.3 Road conditions and brakeslip. 3.3.1 Wet road conditions. 3.3.2 Road conditions, wear, tyre load and speed 3.4 Tyre models for longitudinal slip behaviour 3.5 The pure slip longitudinal Magic Formula description 4. The tyre under cornering conditions 4.1 Vehicle cornering performance 4.2 Lateral slip characteristics 4.3 Side force coefficient for different textures and speeds 4.4 Cornering stiffness versus tyre load 4.5 Pneumatic trail and aligning torque 4.6 The empirical Magic Formula 4.7 Camber 4.8 The Gough plot 5 Combined braking and cornering 5.1 Polar diagrams, Fx vs. Fy and Fx vs. Mz 5.2 The Magic Formula for combined slip. 5.3 Physical tyre models, requirements 5.4 Performance of different physical tyre models 5.5 The Brush model 5.5.1 Displacements in terms of slip and position. 5.5.2 Adhesion and sliding 5.5.3 Shear forces 5.5.4 Aligning torque and pneumatic trail 5.5.5 Tyre characteristics according to the brush mode 5.5.6 Brush model including carcass compliance 5.6 The brush string model 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Wheel & Tire Application Guide
    2016 WHEEL & TIRE APPLICATION GUIDE JOHN NATALIE 1-800-RACE-RIM WWW.DWTRACING.COM 1340 NORTH MELROSE DRIVE, VISTA, CA 92081 APPLICATION INDEX WHEEL STRENGTH AND AVAILABILITY APPLICATIONS BY BOLT PATTERN - 58 HIGH PERFORMANCE. DOUGLAS WHEELS ARE MADE FROM HIGH STRENGTH 6061 ALUMINUM ALLOY THAT IS HEAT TREATED AND AGED FOR MAXIMUM DURABILITY AND UNIFORM STRENGTH. OUR WHEELS ARE MADE IN .125, A5, .190 WHEELS BY VEHICLE: FOUR DIFFERENT STRENGTHS, TO COVER EVERY NEED. ARCTIC CAT - 4 STANDARD STRENGTH. Our BLUE LABEL wheels are made from .125 inch thick 6061 heat CANAM - 5 tereated material, and are ideal for use in dunes and recreational riding. Certain “BLUE CANNONDALE - 5 LABEL” wheels are available with a center plate reinforcement, designated with an “R” in HONDA - 6-7 the description of the wheel. HONDA ATC 3 WHEELER - 16-17 KAWASAKI - 8-9 The A5 features our super strong inner & outer rolled lip design, from .125 inch thick 6061 heat KAWASAKI 2 & 3 WHEELER - 17 treated aluminum which exceeds the strength of most of our competitor’s non heat treated POLARIS - 10-12 aluminum wheels. Most of the rear “A5 Label” wheels are available with a center plate POLARIS RZR 1K- 44-45 reinforcement, designated with an “R” in the description of the wheel. SUZUKI 12-13 SUPER STRENGTH. Our RED LABEL wheels are made from .190 inch thick 6061 heat treated YAMAHA 14-15 material and are virtually indestructible, yet still very light. They are designed for rough use YAMAHA 3 WHEELER - 17 such as desert, cross country and clay tracks. APPLICATIONS BY PRODUCT: ULTIMATE STRENGTH.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Multi-Chamber Tire Concept for Low
    University of Birmingham Multi-chamber tire concept for low rolling- resistance Aldhufairi, Hamad; Essa, Khamis; Olatunbosun, Oluremi DOI: 10.4271/06-12-02-0009 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Aldhufairi, H, Essa, K & Olatunbosun, O 2019, 'Multi-chamber tire concept for low rolling-resistance', SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, 06-12-02-0009, pp. 111-126. https://doi.org/10.4271/06-12-02-0009 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Tire Model with Temperature Effects for Formula SAE Vehicle
    applied sciences Article Tire Model with Temperature Effects for Formula SAE Vehicle Diwakar Harsh 1 and Barys Shyrokau 2,* 1 Rimac Automobili d.o.o., 10431 Sveta Nedelja, Croatia; [email protected] 2 Department of Cognitive Robotics, Delft University of Technology, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 October 2019; Accepted: 4 December 2019; Published: 6 December 2019 Abstract: Formula Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) (FSAE) is a student design competition organized by SAE International (previously known as the Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE). Commonly, the student team performs a lap simulation as a point mass, bicycle or planar model of vehicle dynamics allow for the design of a top-level concept of the FSAE vehicle. However, to design different FSAE components, a full vehicle simulation is required including a comprehensive tire model. In the proposed study, the different tires of a FSAE vehicle were tested at a track to parametrize the tire based on the empirical approach commonly known as the magic formula. A thermal tire model was proposed to describe the tread, carcass, and inflation gas temperatures. The magic formula was modified to incorporate the temperature effect on the force capability of a FSAE tire to achieve higher accuracy in the simulation environment. Considering the model validation, the several maneuvers, typical for FSAE competitions, were performed. A skidpad and full lap maneuvers were chosen to simulate steady-state and transient behavior of the FSAE vehicle. The full vehicle simulation results demonstrated a high correlation to the measurement data for steady-state maneuvers and limited accuracy in highly dynamic driving.
    [Show full text]
  • Parameterization and Modelling of Large Off-Road Tyres for Ride
    Parameterization and Modelling of Large Off-Road Tyres for Ride Analyses Part 1 - Obtaining Parameterization Data M. Joachim Stallmann & P. Schalk Els* & Carl M. Bekker Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Pretoria, co Lynnwood Road and Roper Street, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] Telephone: +27 12 420 2045 E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Joachim Stallmann) [email protected] (P. Schalk Els) [email protected] (Carl M. Bekker) Highlights Most tyre models rely on experimental test data. Obtaining parameterisation test data for large off-road tyres is challenging. A method of obtaining parameterisation and validation test data is proposed. A full set of measurement results are presented. 1 Abstract Multi-body vehicle dynamic simulations play a significant role in the design and development process of off-road vehicles. These simulations require tyre models to describe the forces and moments, which are generated in the tyre-road contact patch, that act on the vehicle. All external forces acting on the vehicle are generated in the tyre-road interface or are due to aerodynamic effects. At the typical speeds encountered during off-road driving, aerodynamic forces can be neglected. The accuracy of the tyre model describing the forces in the tyre-road interface is thus of exceptional importance. It ensures that the simulation model is an accurate representation of the actual vehicle. Various approaches are adopted when developing mathematical tyre models. The complexity of different mathematical tyre models varies greatly, as do the parameterisation efforts required to obtain the model parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Parameterization and Validation of Tyre Models
    1 Parameterization and Modelling of Large Off-Road Tyres for Ride Analyses Part 2 - Parameterization and Validation of Tyre Models M. Joachim Stallmann & P. Schalk Els* Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Pretoria, co Lynnwood Road and Roper Street, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] Telephone: +27 12 420 2045 E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Joachim Stallmann) [email protected] (P. Schalk Els) Highlights Test data is used to parameterize various tyre models. The parameterization process is discussed in detail. Parameterisation effort varies greatly between tyre models. Tyre models are validated against measured test results. Single point contact model can’t be used for ride simulations. FTire model shows the most promising results. 1 Abstract Every mathematical model used in a simulation is an idealization and simplification of reality. Vehicle dynamic simulations that go beyond the fundamental investigations require complex multi- body simulation models. All components used in the simulation model, used to describe the real vehicle, must be modelled with sufficient accuracy to ensure the validity of results. The tyre-road interaction presents one of the biggest challenges in creating an accurate vehicle model. The tyre is a complex assembly of a variety of components. The resulting force generation is thus 2 nonlinear and depends on the operating environments (road surface, inflation pressure, etc) and imposed states (slip angle, magnitude of loading, etc.). Research has focused on describing the forces generated in the tyre-road contact area for many years. Many tyre models have been proposed and developed but proper validation studies are less accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Wheels & Tires
    WHEELS & TIRES EXCLUSIVELY AT POLARIS® AUTHORIZED DEALERS OR Polaris.com/ProArmor YouTube® is a registered trademark of Google Inc. Method Race Wheels® is a registered trademark of Custom Wheel House, LLC. Unless noted, trademarks are the property of Polaris® Industries Inc. Pro Armor® is a registered trademark of Polaris® Industries Inc. Prices and availability are subject to change at any moment. Copyright © 2017 Polaris® Industries. All rights reserved. ® PN: 9930444 EXCLUSIVELY AT POLARIS AUTHORIZED DEALERS OR Polaris.com/ProArmor HOW TO SHOP TABLE OF CONTENTS ® PRO ARMOR PRO ARMOR® TIRE 2 BEADLOCK RINGS 13 WHEELS & TIRES CONSTRUCTION PG 4 PRO ARMOR® WHEELS • Tread patterns optimized for extreme traction 1. PICK A TIRE BASED ON TERRAIN SPECIFIC TIRES 14" WHEELS 14 • Ideal for both hard pack and loose trail WHERE YOU RIDE TRAIL 4 15" WHEELS 15 ROCK/DESERT 6 • Specific tires for specific terrains MUD 8 WHEEL & TIRE SETS 16 and riding styles DUNES 9 4 WHEELS & 4 TIRES ASSEMBLED UTILITY 10 LUGS & CAPS 20 SNOW 12 PG 6 2. PICK A STYLE OF WHEEL THAT FITS YOUR TIRE • Flexible “grippy” tread • Aggressive side bite • 14" and 15" options READING THE CHARTS Wheel Tire Tire Wheel Diameter Height Width Diameter TREAD TIRE PLY SIDEWALL LOAD 3. ORDER DEPTH WEIGHT RATING BELTS RATING • Independently 15" 28" × 10" R15 $ 99 32 lbs 1,140 lbs PG 6 5416346 • 194 • As a complete, preassembled FRONT/REAR 20mm 8 3 • Provides traction and durability set of 4 tires and 4 wheels 30" × 10" R14 14" 39 lbs 1,280 lbs • Built to perform in hard sand, jagged rocks 5415616 • $219 99 or any other extreme terrain 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Among the Contact Patch Length and Width, the Tire Deflection and the Rolling Resistance of a Free-Running Wheel in a Soil Bin Facility
    Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 13(2), e0211, 7 pages (2015) eISSN: 2171-9292 http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015132-5245 Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Relationships among the contact patch length and width, the tire deflection and the rolling resistance of a free-running wheel in a soil bin facility Parviz Tomaraee, Aref Mardani, Arash Mohebbi and Hamid Taghavifar Urmia University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Mechanical Engineering of Agricultural Machinery. Nazloo Road, Urmia 571531177, Iran Abstract Qualitative and quantitative analysis of contact patch length-rolling resistance, contact patch width-rolling resistance and tire deflection-rolling resistance at different wheel load and inflation pressure levels is presented. The experiments were planned in a randomized block design and were conducted in the controlled conditions provided by a soil bin environment utilizing a well- equipped single wheel-tester of Urmia University, Iran. The image processing technique was used for determination of the contact patch length and contact patch width. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate the correlations. The highest values of contact length and width and tire deflection occurred at the highest wheel load and lowest tire inflation pressure. Contact patch width is a polynomial (order 2) function of wheel load while there is a linear relationship between tire contact length and wheel load as well as between tire deflection and wheel load. Correlations were developed for the evaluation of contact patch length-rolling resistance, contact patch width-rolling resistance and tire deflection-rolling resistance. It is concluded that the variables studied have a sig- nificant effect on rolling resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerometer Based Method for Tire Load and Slip Angle Estimation
    Accelerometer Based Method for Tire Load and Slip Angle Estimation Kanwar Bharat Singh and Saied Taheri Center for Tire Research (CenTiRe) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA 24061, USA Abstract: Tire mounted sensors are emerging as a promising technology, capable of providing information about important tire states. This paper presents a survey of the state-of-the-art in the field of smart tire technology, with a special focus on the different signal processing techniques proposed by researchers to estimate the tire load and slip angle using tire mounted accelerometers. Next, details about the research activities undertaken as part of this study to develop a smart tire are presented. Finally, novel algorithms for estimating the tire load and slip angle are presented. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. Keywords: smart tire system, signal processing, tire load, tire slip angle, accelerometer 1. Introduction The application of sensor technology in tires has been extensively studied over the last decade by many researchers [1-6]. The stimulus for the research and application of sensor technology in tires was the Bridgestone/Firestone recall of 14.4 million tires in 2000 [7]. Because of the recalls, U.S. legislators included tire pressure monitoring (TPMS) as part of its TREAD Act [8-10]. Thereafter, European countries (via United Nations regulation UNECE-R64) adopted the TPMS legislation for new models beginning in November 2012, and for all vehicles beginning in November 2014. South Korea has adopted similar TPMS legislation to that of Europe. Likewise, countries such as Japan, China and India are in the process of investigating TPMS technology as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Variables Associated with Wheel Spin-Down and Hydroplaning
    A STUDY OF VARIABLES ASSOCIATED WITH WHEEL SPIN-DOWN AND HYDROPLANING by J. E. Martinez Associate Research Engineer J. M. Lewis Research Assistant and A. J. Stocker Associate Research Engineer Research Report Number 147-1 Variables Associated with Hydroplaning Research Study Number 2-8-70-147 Sponsored by The Texas Highway Department In Cooperation With the U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration March 1972 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE Texas A&M University College Station, Texas ~----------- TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page I. Abstract iii . .- II. Summary iv III. Implementation vi IV. Acknowledgements vii V. Introduction .. 1 VI. Review of the Literature 2 VII. Selection of Parameters 8 VIII. Experimentation 11 IX. Discussion of Results . 14 X. Applicability to Safe Wet Weather Speeds 19 XI. Conclusions . 22 XI!. References • . 24 XIII. Figures . 29 ii ABSTRACT An evaluation of the wet weather properties of a portland cement concrete pavement and a bituminous surface treatment is presented. The study uses wheel spin-do~m as the criterion and considers the effect of water depth, tire inflation pressure, tire tread depth and wheel load. A hydroplaning trough 800 ft. long, 30 in. wide and 4 in. deep was used in obtaining the data. The results indicate that the bituminous surface treatment requires a considerably higher ground speed to cause spin--down than the concrete pavement. Further, even though a single critical speed does not exist for the range of variables selected, a reduction of speed to 50 mph is recommended for any section of highW?~ where water can accumulate to depths of 0.1 inch or more during wet weather periods.
    [Show full text]