DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes for Interviewer Introduce Yourself and the Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Notes for Interviewer Introduce yourself and the project: Emphasise it is a collaborative project. Exchange business cards. Explain why respondent has been selected: - emphasise their positional importance Explain structure of interview - questions about background and career - questions about recent changes in the city and their work - questions about their attitudes Make Observations while waiting for the interview, and while in his/her office: who else is seeing the respondent, what kind of office does he/she have, who telephones, how often is the interview interrupted, what is the attitude of the respondent to the interviewer and project. Local Governance in Pecs (Hungary) Project Aims The project is a study of patterns of change in local decision-making in central and Eastern Europe. Pecs has been selected for study because of its importance as a regional city in Hungary Sponsor and Participants This project is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, as part of its One Europe or Several? Programme (research project No. L213252030). The project leader is Dr James Hughes, London School of Economics and Political Science, with co-researchers Dr Peter John, University of Southampton, and Dr Gwendolyn Sasse, London School of Economics and Political Science. Interview Schedule Date of Interview: Interviewee: Respondent's Full Name: Current Position: Part One: Socio-Biographical Data Question 1: Tell me about your present career? 1. Current position? 2. Previous employment before current position ? 3. Previous employment (and duration) before fall of communism in 1989? 4. Are you appointed or elected? 5. If an Appointed local administrative official, are you appointed by central or regional authorities? Question 2: Tell me about your social and career background? Date of Birth Place of Birth Where grew up When settled in city/region Occupation of parents Citizenship of self and parents Nationality, if different from citizenship Religion, if any Place of residence Education : Age when completed full-time education: If over 18 years, which University or other higher educational institution: name, where located and specialisation 1 Question 3: In your opinion, which of the following words bests describes you? (in order of preference) and what is the next best, if any? European East European Central European Hungarian Person from Baranya Region Person from Pecs Part Two: NETWORKS Question 4: During the last six months, who are the people that you have been in most frequent contact with on questions of importance for the city? How often are these contacts? How would you estimate the quality of these contacts (Interviewee to use 1 to 5 scale: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=neither good nor bad, 4=bad, 5=very bad) Daily Weekly Monthly Quality Name, Position, Organisation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. continue as necessary 2 Question 5: Have you travelled outside your country in the last six months? YES/ NO How many times and to which countries, and to which organisation (if work related)? Name/Position Organisation Country Frequency 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Question 6: Could you tell us who have been your recent visitors from overseas in the last six months? Name/Position Organisation Country Frequency 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Part Three: INFLUENCE Question 7: Who, in your opinion, are the SIX most influential people in the city in order of importance? Names, Position, Organisation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 3 Question 8: Who, in your opinion, are the SIX most influential business people in the city in order of importance? Names, Position, Business 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Question 9: In general, how much influence do you think you have over decisions that affect the city? High good medium low none Part Four: Attitudes Toward Europe Question 10: Do you think the future of your country is most closely tied up with? a. The European Union b. The United States of America c. Russia d. Germany e. Other Central and Eastern European countries f. Other European countries like Norway and Switzerland which remain outside the European Union g. None of the above 4 Question 11: Generally, what is your opinion of the aims and activities of the European Union? Positive neutral negative Question 12: Which five of the following phrases best sums up the European Union for you? [Interviewer: show card and tick five statements respondent chooses] 1) Economic Cohesion 7) Europe of The Regions 2) Partnership for Peace 8) Monetary Union 3) Subsidiarity 9) A Federal Europe 4) Europe of Nation States 10) Common Foreign and Security Policy 5) Free Trade 11) Common European Home 6) Common Agricultural Policy 12) Structural Funds Question 13: Who do you think benefits most out of the relationship between your country and the European Union? Hungary European Union How much do you think Hungary benefits? Significantly Moderately Minimally Not At All How much do you think European Union benefits? Significantly Moderately Minimally Not At All 5 Question 14: How much do you think EU enlargement has benefited Pecs? Significantly Moderately Minimally Not At All Briefly give the key reasons for your response? Question 15: Do you personally feel that the creation of a market economy, that is one largely free from state control, is right or wrong for the future of your country? Right Wrong Briefly explain your response? Question 16: Please state whether you have ever been involved in any EU funded project? YES / NO Can you name Three (or more) current EU funded (wholly or partly) projects in Pecs? 1. 2. 3. 6 Question 17: Who do you think benefits most out of the relationship between your country and NATO? Hungary NATO How much do you think Hungary benefits? Significantly Moderately Minimally Not At All How much do you think NATO benefits? Significantly Moderately Minimally Not At All Part Five: Transition in the City Question 18: On the whole, are you satisfied with the development of democracy and a market economy since 1989? Democracy Country very satisfied fairly satisfied not very satisfied not at all satisfied City very satisfied fairly satisfied not very satisfied not at all satisfied Region very satisfied fairly satisfied not very satisfied not at all satisfied briefly explain your response? Market economy Country very satisfied fairly satisfied not very satisfied not at all satisfied City very satisfied fairly satisfied not very satisfied not at all satisfied Region very satisfied fairly satisfied not very satisfied not at all satisfied Briefly explain your response? 7 Question 19: What, in your opinion are the most important issues facing Pecs and Hungary at this time? (please rank in order, 1 = most important) Pecs Hungary Political Economic Social EU Accession Joining NATO Other (please name) Question 20: Do you agree or disagree with the proposition that traditional local administrative boundaries in Hungary should be redrawn, if necessary, to comply with EU funding criteria? YES in some places NO Including your own region? YES NO Part Six: Additional Biographical Information Question 21: Are you a member of any clubs/associations? (please name and say how long) local regional national international Question 22: Have you ever been a candidate in an election? Local YES/ NO Regional YES/ NO National YES/ NO Question 23: Are you currently a member of a political party? YES/ NO If yes, please name 8 Question 24: Were you a member of the Communist Party? Date joined/left Office held (if any) Can you nominate other contacts for discussion of issues raised in this project? Name, Position, Organisation 1. 2. 9 1 CODEBOOK FOR ELITES AND INSTITUTIONS IN REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE CAREER PATH (0) Interviewer 1 = Local 2 = LSE interviewer 3 = Self completed (1) Current Position 1 = city administration 2 = county/regional administration 3 = business /engineering/managerial 4 = banking/finance 5 = professional 6 = education/culture/media 7 = other 8 = central administration/politics (e.g. MP. Minister) 9 = political/business (inc. local admin.) 10 = political/professional-culture 11 = local administration/politics 12 = party politics 13 = not working/retired 14 = politics/other activity (1 and 2 include members of local councils. In some cases respondents identified themselves simply as member of local council [[when they may have held other positions at the same time]], whereas in other respondents identified themselves as being in business and member of local council.) 1a/Current Position 1 = Administration/politics 2 = Administration and other activity 3 = Private sector 4 = Professional/education/media 5 = Other Previous employment before current position (2) Change in position 1 = no change in position 2 = different position (3) Actual Position 1 = city administration 2 = county administration 3 = business/engineering/managerial 4 = banking/finance 2 5 = professional 6 = education/culture/media/research 7 = other 8 = not working/student/retired 9 = worker/craftsman 10 = administration/politics 11 = political/business-technical 12 = political/professional-culture 13 = business/education Employment before 1989 (4) Change in position 1 = no change in position 2 = different position (5) Actual position 1 = city administration 2 = county administration 3 = enterprises/engineering/ business/banking/finance 4 = professional 5 = education/culture/media/research 6 = not working/student/not in permanent employment 7 = other 8 = worker/craftsman/skilled worker 9 = central administration/politics 10 = administration/professional-cultural (5a) Position before 1989 1 = Administration 2 = Business/banking 3 = professional/education/media 4 = worker/skilled worker 5 = not working/student 6 = other (6) Appointed or elected 0 = not applicable 1 = appointed 2 = elected 3 = indirectly elected (7) Locus of appointment of local officials 0 = not applicable 1= central authorities 2 = county/regional authorities or (local level appointment) [[Though respondents were not given option of local level appointment, it is evident that some respondents answered ‘regional’ or ‘county’ level when they actually meant 3 local versus central. Initially I tried to separate this into two different variables.
Recommended publications
  • YUGOSLAVIA Official No

    YUGOSLAVIA Official No

    YUGOSLAVIA Official No. : C. 169. M. 99. 1939. Conf. E. V. R. 23. Geneva, August 1939. LEAGUE OF NATIONS EUROPEAN CONFERENCE O N RURAL LIFE National Monographs drawn up by Governments YUGOSLAVIA Series of League of Nations Publications EUROPEAN CONFERENCE « « O N RURAL LIFE ^ « 5 Peasant from the Cettinje neighbourhood (Montenegro). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I n t r o d u c t io n ................................................................................................ 5 I. P op u lation : General C onsiderations............................ g II. A griculture : Structure........................................................ 16 III. A grarian R e f o r m .................................................................. 18 1. Ancient Provinces of the Voivodine, Syrmia, Slavonia, Croatia and S lo v en ia .................... 18 2. Southern S e r b i a ......................................................... 19 3. Bosnia and H erzegovina.......................................... 19 4 . D a lm a tia ....................................................................... 19 IV. T echnical I mprovement of the So i l ....................... 21 V. Improvement of Live-stock and Plants .... 24 VI. A gricultural In d u st r ie s .................................................... 27 VII. L and Settlemen r .................................................................. 28 Technical and Cultural Propaganda in Country D i s t r i c t ............................................................................. 30 VIII. A gricultural Co-operation
  • Oligarchs, King and Local Society: Medieval Slavonia

    Oligarchs, King and Local Society: Medieval Slavonia

    Antun Nekić OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University CEU eTD Collection Budapest May2015 OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ Examiner Budapest Month YYYY OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ External Reader Budapest Month YYYY OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest Month YYYY I, the undersigned, Antun Nekić, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography. I declare that no unidentified and illegitimate use was made of the work of others, and no part of the thesis infringes on any person’s or institution’s copyright.
  • S. Transdanubia Action Plan, by Pécs-Baranya, HU

    S. Transdanubia Action Plan, by Pécs-Baranya, HU

    Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism (CCT) in Europe Action Plan for South Transdanubia, Hungary ChamMap of partnerber of are Commercea / Partner info and Industry of Pécs- Baranya May 2021 Cultural and Creative Industries contribution to Cultural and Creative Tourism in Europe _________________________ © Cult-CreaTE Project Partnership and Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya, Hungary This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-CreaTE Project Management and Coordination Unit and the respective partner: Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-CreaTE Action Plan Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs- Baranya, Hungary The Cult-CreaTE Project Communications unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this action plan as a source, sent to e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pécs-Baranya and in no way reflect the views of the Cult-CreaTE partnership, the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user.
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia

    Memorial of the Republic of Croatia

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
  • A Historical Geographical Analysis of the Development of the Croatian-Hungarian Border

    A Historical Geographical Analysis of the Development of the Croatian-Hungarian Border

    2014/IV. pp. 75-92. ISSN: 2062-1655 Tvrtko Josip Čelan A Historical Geographical Analysis of the Development of the Croatian-Hungarian Border ABSTRACT This paper analyses the Croatian-Hungarian boundary and state border features and gives an overview of development stages of boundary/border through the history, including Croatian accession to the European Union (EU) in 2013. The aim of this work is to define if antecedent changes have had positive impact on the Croatian-Hungarian border area. I will examine the historical geographical background of the Mura-Drava boundary/border. Next to considering all relevant European and wider literature I will compare and if necessary confront Croatian and Hungarian scientific resources. Special focus will be on assessing the role and importance of the common border and its modifications in the past, with reflection on the current period when the Republic of Croatia is an EU Member State, aiming to join soon the Schengen Area. Although the changes in Europe have been very intensive in the last twenty-five years, from the fall of the Berlin Wall to biggest ever EU enlargement process (2004-2007), the favourable historical circumstances have not been utilised in the Croatian-Hungarian border strip. This area is still suffering from large geographical handicap, presenting strong language and transport barriers. The border zone remained a strong periphery compared to the two capitals (Zagreb, Budapest) of significantly centralised states Croatia and Hungary. Keywords: Croatian-Hungarian boundary, 900 years of joint history, old European border, geographical handicap, language and transport barriers, cross-border area, European Union. IntroDuction “Boundaries are conceived of as lines separating entities from each other.
  • Buried Neogene Volcanic Structures in Hungary

    Buried Neogene Volcanic Structures in Hungary

    Acta Geologica Hungarica, Vol. 47/23, pp. 177219 (2004) Buried Neogene volcanic structures in Hungary Tibor Zelenka Endre Balázs Hungarian Geological Survey, Budapest MOL, Hungarian Oil Company, Budapest Kadosa Balogh János Kiss Institute of Nuclear Research, Eötvös Loránd Geophysical Institute, Budapest Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen Miklós Kozák László Nemesi University of Debrecen, Debrecen ELGOSCAR Ltd, Budapest Zoltán Pécskay Zoltán Püspöki Institute of Nuclear Research, University of Debrecen, Debrecen Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen Csaba Ravasz Vilma Széky-Fux Geological Institute of Hungary, Budapest University of Debrecen, Debrecen Antal Újfalussy MOL, Hungarian Oil Company, Budapest Surface Neogene volcanics in Hungary are abundantly documented in the literature, but buried volcanic structures are little known. Early burial of the volcanic centers beneath latest Miocene to Pliocene sediments preserved much of their original relief, permitting their classification into genetic types. More than two-thirds of Hungary is covered by thick Neogene and Quaternary sediments, below which buried volcanic eruptive centers and the extent of their products may only be recognized by complex geologic-geophysical methods. Our study is based on the data of several thousand wells, more than 60,000 km of seismic sections, as well as airborne and surface geophysical (gravimetric, magnetic, electromagnetic, radiometric) data. Results of chemical, mineralogical studies and K/Ar dating of deep cores were also included. The data were evaluated in terms of the regional deep structure of the Carpathian-Balkan region, the Miocene evolution of which was determined by the position, movement and welding of individual microplates. Integration of all available data reveals that the Miocene volcanic centers are concentrated near microplate boundaries.
  • Ethnic Hungarians in Ex-Yugoslavia

    Ethnic Hungarians in Ex-Yugoslavia

    ETHNIC HUNGARIANS IN EX-YUGOSLAVIA S.O.S. TRANSYLVANIA – GENEVA COMMITTEE April 1993 Ottawa Table of Contents Introduction Map of Republics and autonomous territories of former Yugoslavia. … . 5 Part I: Baranja/Baranya , . …. ……. 6 Expulsion and execut.on of Hungarians and Croatians. .. .……………..6 Geo-politicalHlstory of Baranja/Baranya . ……..….. .10 Part II: Vojvodina/Bacska and Banat ……………………………………………...……11 Letter to the President of Serbia from Andras Agoston …………………...…..12 Letter of the Leaders of the VMDK to the Serbian Parliament. 14 Hungarian language education in the Vojvodina/Bacska and Banat ………….15 Law of the Republic of Serbia concerning official language use. 17 Amnesty International Alert. ... 19 Declaration of the Human Rights \Committee of the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Vojvodina . 20 Geo-politicalhlstory of Vojvodina/Bacska and Banat ………………………….21 Ethnic composition of Vojvodina/Bacska and Banat …………………………..26 Map1. The ethnic composition in the 11th century …………………………….28 Map 2. The ethnic composItion in the 15th century. ………… . 29 Map3.The ethnic composition in1981 ………………………………………….30 Part III: Historicalnotes …………………………………………………………………...31 Geopolitical Hlstory of Croatia …………………………………………………31 Geopolitical History of Serbia…………………………………………..………35 Historical maps of Europe from1250 to 1920 Map 4. Europe in 1250………………………………………………………… 41 Map 5 Europe in 1500…………………………………………………………..42 Map 6. Europe in 1648 ………………………………………………………….43 Map 7 Europe in 1750………………………………………………………….44 Map 8. The constituent parts of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. ……….. 45 Map9.Europe in 1815 …………………………………………………………..46 Map 10. Europe in 1885 ………………………………………………………...47 Map 11. The split of the Austro-Hungarian Empire after World War I ……….. 48 Map of “Great Serbia” – Serbian territorial claims……………………………...49 Hungarians in Yugoslavia, Croatis and Sovenia. ………...…50 Hungarians in Hungary and surrounding countries (present) .
  • Report on the Activity of the Hungarian Committee on Geographical Names

    Report on the Activity of the Hungarian Committee on Geographical Names

    E/CONF.105/145/CRP.145 28 July 2017 Original: English Eleventh United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names New York, 8-17 August 2017 Item 5 of the provisional agenda* Reports by Governments on the situation in their countries and on the progress made in the standardization of geographical names since the Tenth Conference (for distribution only). Report of Hungary 2012–2017 Submitted by Hungary ** _______________________ *E/CONF.105/1 * Prepared by the Hungarian Committee on Geographical Names – Gábor Gercsák, Tamás Koós, Gábor Mikesy and Béla Pokoly A. Jurisdiction on Geographical Names A/1. Jurisdiction As regards new legal measures following 2012 and affecting geographical names in Hungary, these measures had direct impact only on the existing administrative division and the system of postal addresses. 1.) The Hungarian Committee on Geographical Names continues to work on the legal basis of Gov. Decree No. 303/2007. (XI. 14.) Korm., on the establishment and recording of official geographical names in Hungary, supervised by the Ministry of Agriculture. 2.) Act. No. XLVI. of 2012 on land surveying and mapping activity confirmed that creation, continuance and data service of Database Gazetteer of Hungary has been a basic state task, which has been provided by the public authority for land surveying and remote sensing. This public authority was the Institute of Geodesy, Cartography and Remote Sensing (FÖMI) until the end of 2016, which continues its work as the Department of Geodesy, Remote Sensing and Land Offices of Government Office of the Capital City Budapest from 1 January 2017. 3.) Act No. CLXVII stipulates that since 1 January 2013 municipalities may not include in the names of streets, squares or public institutions the proper names of persons participating in establishing, forming or maintaining any 20th century totalitarian political system, or any phrase or organization that can directly be associated with such a system.
  • Boundary & Territory Briefing

    Boundary & Territory Briefing

    International Boundaries Research Unit BOUNDARY & TERRITORY BRIEFING Volume 3 Number 3 War and Peace on the Danube: The Evolution of the Croatia-Serbia Boundary Mladen Klemenčić and Clive Schofield Boundary and Territory Briefing Volume 3 Number 3 ISBN 1-897643-41-1 2001 War and Peace on the Danube: The Evolution of the Croatia-Serbia Boundary by Mladen Klemenčić and Clive Schofield With a contribution from Miroslav Reba International Boundaries Research Unit Department of Geography University of Durham South Road Durham DH1 3LE UK Tel: UK + 44 (0) 191 334 1961 Fax: UK +44 (0) 191 334 1962 E-mail: [email protected] www: http://www-ibru.dur.ac.uk The Authors Mladen Klemenčić is a Croatian political geographer working with the Lexicographic Institute in Zagreb. He is a former Fellow with the International Boundaries Research Unit and is regional editor for former Yugoslavia for IBRU’s Boundary and Security Bulletin. Dr Clive Schofield is Deputy Director of the International Boundaries Research Unit at the University of Durham, England. IBRU works to enhance the resources available for the peaceful resolution of problems associated with international boundaries on land and at sea around the world. Acknowledgements The authors would like to warmly thank Miro Reba for his assistance. Much of the material on cadastral limits and claims related to the ‘Danube dispute’ between Croatia and Serbia included in this Briefing is based on Miro’s dissertation on that topic for his M.A. in International Boundaries at the University of Durham (1999). Thanks are also due to David Hume, Steven Allan and Chris Orton of Durham University’s Design and Imaging Unit who are responsible for most of the maps accompanying the text.
  • General Information Research and Teaching Activities

    General Information Research and Teaching Activities

    CURRICULUM VITAE General information Name Mario Kevo Research position Senior Research Associate Research and teaching position Associate Professor Academic discipline Humanities Scientific field History Branch of science Croatian and World Modern and Temporary History World War II, Concentration Camps, Charity, Work of the International Area(s) of research and interest Committee of the Red Cross Researcher ID number 252645 Date and place of birth 1977, May 11th, Varaždin (Croatia) Telephone 00 385 (1) 3706 685 E-mail [email protected] Research and teaching activities Teaching activities University of Zagreb – Studia Croatica 2008-2009 1. Demographic aspects of the Homeland War in Croatia (Croatian Studies) 1. Croatian History: 1914-1941 Catholic University of 2. Croatian History: 1941-1991 2012-2013 Croatia 3. Economical History of Croatian Lands in European Context 4. History of Science and Technology 1. Croatian History: 1918-1945 2. Croatia in Monarhistic Yugoslavia 3. Historical Demography Catholic University of 2013-2014 4. Contemporary Historiographical Interpretation Croatia 5. History of the Red Cross 6. History of Science and Technology 1. Croatian History: 1918-1945 2. Croatia in Monarhistic Yugoslavia Catholic University of 2014-2015 and 3. Historical Demography Croatia 2015-2016 4. World War II 5. Contemporary Historiographical Interpretation 6. History of Science and Technology 1. Croatian History: 1918-1945 Catholic University of 2016-2017 2. Economic and Social History Croatia 3. Croatia in Monarhistic Yugoslavia 1 CURRICULUM VITAE 4. Historical Demography 5. World War II 6. Contemporary Historiographical Interpretation 1. Croatian History: 1918-1945 2. Economic and Social History 3. History of Institution and Political Administration of the Catholic University of 2017-2018 Croatian Lands Croatia 4.
  • WB Karapancsa 10 02 2012.Indd

    WB Karapancsa 10 02 2012.Indd

    1 Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve 2 Srebarna Nature Reserve 3 Kalimok-Brushlen Protected Site 4 Rusenski Lom Nature Park 5 Persina Nature Park 6 Djerdap National Park 7 Gornje Podunavlje Special Nature Reserve 8 Kopački rit Nature Park 9 Lonjsko Polje Nature Park 10 Duna-Dráva National Park 11 Duna-Ipoly National Park 12 Dunajské luhy Protected Landscape Area 13 Záhorie Protected Landscape Area 14 Donau-Auen National Park 15 Donauauwald Neuburg Ingolstadt TRANS-BOUNDARY MANAGEMENT CONCEPT for the Karapancsa (hU) / Karapandza (srB) Authors: András Márkus, Radmila Šakić network of protected areas JOINT NATURE CONSERVATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN OF KARAPANCSA-KARAPANDŽA Preface The erstwhile integrate landscape of Karapancsa-Karapandža is divided with state borders since long time ago. The different use of the areas – as result of different owner status characteristics and laws – resulted diverse landscapes in Hungary and Serbia. The differences are experiancable nowadays too in many ways therefore the whole area unfortunately can not be treated as one. Because of these basic differences we did not unified the nature conservational plans written by the managing bodies of the two countries. Of course the natural characteristics – climate, geology, water regime, flora and fauna – are very similar therefore it might be possible to simplify the descriptions of the areas but we thought the picture can be complete only if we give all the informations what we have. So finally in the following chapters, in order of flowing of the Danube, we submit the shortened management plans of the Duna-Drava National Park for Karapancsa in Hungary and the same documentation of the Gornje Podunavlje for Karapandža in Serbia.
  • How to Be Successful in Tourism

    How to Be Successful in Tourism

    How to be successful in tourism Created as the part of transnational cooperation project “Tourism and LEADER knowledge exchange between Croatia and Slovak Republic” between MAS Chopok juh and LAG Baranja Data gathering paper on all relevant areas related to rural tourism development in Baranja region 1 / 160 Introduction This paper was created as the part of transnational cooperation project “Tourism and LEADER knowledge exchange between Croatia and Slovak Republic” between MAS Chopok juh and LAG Baranja. Since the main aim of the project is exchange of knowledge and LAG Baranja operates in region with success in developing rural tourism, its task is to develop this paper which compiles most of the available data from various sources on topic of tourism development. Methodology The main methodology of this data compilation is finding and presenting currently available data, information, practical examples and knowledge gathered which illustrate how Baranja region is successful in attracting new tourists and tourism development. The emphasis of the paper is the identification of the best practice examples, while also taking into account characteristics of the process, features and key factors which support or hinder tourism development activities. The paper should answer the question: “How to be successful in tourism?”. It will feature “big” state level initiated development projects and bottom-up community initiated projects appropriate for LEADER principles. This paper is continuation and progression of previous, more narrowed and focused project documents, which should expand knowledge base and give new ideas to our project partner (Mas Chopok juh) to develop their tourism further. Main methods used in this paper: 1.