DOCSLIB.ORG

Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 of 40 Glasgow Botanic Gardens 21/01/2021 Species List Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Brevipalpus oncidii 2019 2019 1 acarine Eriophyes leiosoma 1994 1994 1 acarine Eriophyes tiliae 2011 2011 1 acarine Eriophyes tiliae subsp. tiliae 1994 1994 1 acarine Hydrachnidae 2015 2015 1 amphibian Lissotriton helveticus Palmate Newt 2018 2018 1 amphibian Rana temporaria Common Frog 1963 2018 7 annelid Aporrectodea caliginosa s.l. Grey Worm 2017 2017 1 annelid Eisenia fetida Brandling 1987 1988 2 annelid Hirudinea Leech 2018 2018 1 annelid Lumbricus terrestris Common Earthworm 2017 2017 1 annelid Oligochaeta 2015 2015 1 annelid Stylaria lacustris 1995 1995 1 annelid Tubifex 1994 1994 1 bird Acanthis cabaret Lesser Redpoll 1998 2020 1 bird Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk 1894 2020 7 bird Actitis hypoleucos Common Sandpiper 1894 1901 1 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 1966 2020 16 bird Alauda arvensis Skylark 1894 1901 1 bird Alcedo atthis Kingfisher 1883 2020 31 bird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 1894 2020 30 bird Anthus pratensis Meadow Pipit 1894 1901 1 bird Apus apus Swift 1894 1998 4 bird Ardea cinerea Grey Heron 1966 2020 11 bird Aythya ferina Pochard 1982 1982 1 bird Aythya fuligula Tufted Duck 1966 2020 2 bird Bombycilla garrulus Waxwing 1966 2020 15 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 1894 2020 14 bird Certhia familiaris Treecreeper 1894 2017 4 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 1894 2020 12 bird Chroicocephalus ridibundus Black-headed Gull 1894 2020 5 bird Cinclus cinclus Dipper 1966 2020 9 bird Coloeus monedula Jackdaw 1894 2020 3 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 1966 2020 31 bird Columba oenas Stock Dove 2019 2020 6 2 of 40 Glasgow Botanic Gardens 21/01/2021 Species List Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 1894 2020 29 bird Corvus corone agg. Carrion Crow 1966 2020 18 bird Corvus frugilegus Rook 1876 1971 3 bird Crex crex Corncrake 1898 1899 1 bird Cuculus canorus Cuckoo 1894 1896 1 bird Curruca communis Whitethroat 1894 1971 2 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 1894 2020 28 bird Cygnus cygnus Whooper Swan 2017 2017 1 bird Cygnus olor Mute Swan 1966 2020 4 bird Dendrocopos major Great Spotted Woodpecker 1994 2020 14 bird Emberiza calandra Corn Bunting 1894 1901 1 bird Emberiza citrinella Yellowhammer 1894 1901 1 bird Emberiza schoeniclus Reed Bunting 1894 1901 1 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 1894 2020 27 bird Falco peregrinus Peregrine 2020 2020 1 bird Falco tinnunculus Kestrel 1966 1998 3 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 1894 2020 19 bird Fringilla montifringilla Brambling 1966 1971 1 bird Fulica atra Coot 1966 2020 2 bird Gallinago gallinago Snipe 1966 1974 1 bird Gallinula chloropus Moorhen 1894 2020 11 bird Haematopus ostralegus Oystercatcher 1966 1971 1 bird Hirundo rustica Swallow 1894 1901 1 bird Larus argentatus Herring Gull 1996 2020 4 bird Larus canus Common Gull 2007 2007 1 bird Larus fuscus Lesser Black-backed Gull 1966 2020 11 bird Linaria cannabina Linnet 1894 1971 2 bird Mergellus albellus Smew 1996 1996 1 bird Mergus merganser Goosander 1994 2020 45 bird Motacilla alba Pied Wagtail agg. 1994 1998 1 bird Motacilla alba yarrellii Pied Wagtail 1894 2020 4 bird Motacilla cinerea Grey Wagtail 1894 2020 8 bird Motacilla flava Yellow Wagtail 1894 1971 2 bird Muscicapa striata Spotted Flycatcher 1894 1974 2 bird Nycticorax nycticorax Night-heron 1927 1928 1 3 of 40 Glasgow Botanic Gardens 21/01/2021 Species List Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records bird Parus major Great Tit 1894 2020 21 bird Passer domesticus House Sparrow 1894 2020 12 bird Perdix Partridge 1894 1901 1 bird Periparus ater Coal Tit 1894 2020 18 bird Phalacrocorax carbo Cormorant 2007 2020 6 bird Phasianus colchicus Pheasant 1889 1890 1 bird Phoenicurus phoenicurus Redstart 1894 1901 1 bird Phylloscopus collybita Chiffchaff 1881 2020 7 bird Phylloscopus sibilatrix Wood Warbler 1894 1901 1 bird Phylloscopus trochilus Willow Warbler 1897 2020 19 bird Pica pica Magpie 1901 2020 29 bird Prunella modularis Dunnock 1894 2020 18 bird Psittacula krameri Ring-necked Parakeet 2014 2020 7 bird Pyrrhula pyrrhula Bullfinch 1894 2020 19 bird Regulus regulus Goldcrest 1972 2020 14 bird Riparia riparia Sand Martin 1894 1901 1 bird Saxicola rubetra Whinchat 1975 1975 1 bird Saxicola rubicola Stonechat 1886 1887 1 bird Scolopax rusticola Woodcock 1980 2020 2 bird Sitta europaea Nuthatch 2015 2020 28 bird Streptopelia decaocto Collared Dove 1974 2020 3 bird Strix aluco Tawny Owl 1894 2019 6 bird Sturnus vulgaris Starling 1894 2020 4 bird Sylvia atricapilla Blackcap 1881 2020 6 bird Tachybaptus ruficollis Little Grebe 2009 2009 2 bird Troglodytes troglodytes Wren 1894 2020 22 bird Turdus iliacus Redwing 1894 2020 6 bird Turdus merula Blackbird 1894 2020 24 bird Turdus philomelos Song Thrush 1894 2020 7 bird Turdus pilaris Fieldfare 1894 2020 3 bird Turdus viscivorus Mistle Thrush 1894 2020 12 bird Tyto alba Barn Owl 1894 1901 1 bird Vanellus vanellus Lapwing 1894 1901 1 bony fish Anguilla anguilla Eel 2016 2016 1 bony fish Barbatula barbatula Stone Loach 1983 1983 1 4 of 40 Glasgow Botanic Gardens 21/01/2021 Species List Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records bony fish Gasterosteus aculeatus Three-spined Stickleback 1994 1994 1 bony fish Phoxinus phoxinus Minnow 1983 1983 1 bryozoan Fredericella sultana 1995 1995 1 centipede Chilopoda Centipede 2017 2017 1 centipede Cryptops hortensis 1912 2009 5 centipede Dicellophilus carniolensis 1913 1914 1 centipede Geophilus insculptus 1996 1996 1 centipede Lamyctes emarginatus 1988 1988 1 centipede Lithobius forficatus 1988 2017 7 centipede Lithobius melanops 1988 2009 4 coelenterate Hydra 1994 1994 1 conifer Larix decidua European Larch 2018 2018 1 conifer Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce 2018 2018 1 conifer Taxus baccata Yew 2018 2018 1 crustacean Androniscus dentiger Rosy Woodlouse 1901 1988 4 crustacean Arcitalitrus dorrieni Landhopper 2017 2020 6 crustacean Armadillidium nasatum 1909 1909 3 crustacean Asellus aquaticus Water hog lice/slaters 1994 2018 6 crustacean Cordioniscus stebbingi 1908 1988 2 crustacean Cyclocypris laevis 1869 1869 1 crustacean Cylisticus convexus 1906 1909 3 crustacean Daphnia hyalina 1994 1994 1 crustacean Gammarus Freshwater Shrimp 2015 2015 1 crustacean Haplophthalmus mengii sensu lato 1988 1988 1 crustacean Oniscus asellus Common Shiny Woodlouse 1988 2017 8 crustacean Porcellio scaber Common Rough Woodlouse 1988 2017 3 crustacean Porcellionides pruinosus 1906 1988 10 crustacean Trichoniscus pusillus Common Pygmy Woodlouse 1976 1996 3 crustacean Trichoniscus pygmaeus 1976 1977 1 crustacean Trichorhina tomentosa 1988 1988 1 false scorpion Ephippiochthonius tetrachelatus Dimple-clawed Chthonid 1988 1988 2 false scorpion Neobisium carcinoides Common Neobisid 2018 2018 1 false scorpion Roncus lubricus Reddish Two-eyed Chelifer 2017 2017 1 fern Adiantum capillus-veneris Maidenhair Fern 2018 2018 1 fern Asplenium ruta-muraria Wall-rue 2018 2018 1 5 of 40 Glasgow Botanic Gardens 21/01/2021 Species List Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records fern Asplenium trichomanes Maidenhair Spleenwort 1985 2017 4 fern Athyrium filix-femina Lady-fern 1985 2017 3 fern Blechnum spicant Hard-fern 1985 2017 3 fern Dryopteris affinis s.l. Dryopteris affinis 2017 2017 1 fern Dryopteris cambrensis Buckler-Fern 2018 2018 1 fern Dryopteris dilatata Broad Buckler-fern 2017 2017 1 fern Dryopteris filix-mas Male-fern 1985 2017 3 fern Phyllitis scolopendrium Hart's-tongue 1985 2018 8 fern Polypodium vulgare s. l. Polypody 2017 2017 1 fern Polystichum aculeatum Hard Shield-fern 2018 2018 1 fern Polystichum setiferum Soft Shield-fern 1996 2018 2 fern Pteridium aquilinum Bracken 2018 2018 1 flatworm Arthurdendyus triangulatus New Zealand Flatworm 1988 1994 2 flatworm Bipalium kewense 1988 1996 3 flatworm Dendrocoelum lacteum 1994 1995 2 flatworm Polycelis nigra 1994 1994 1 flatworm Turbellaria 2018 2018 1 flowering plant Acaena novae-zelandiae Pirri-pirri-bur 2018 2018 1 flowering plant Acaena ovalifolia Two-spined Acaena 1994 1995 1 flowering plant Acer platanoides Norway Maple 1985 2017 3 flowering plant Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore 1985 2017 3 flowering plant Achillea millefolium Yarrow 1985 1986 2 flowering plant Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder 1985 2017 3 flowering plant Aesculus hippocastanum Horse-chestnut 1986 2017 3 flowering plant Agrostis capillaris Common Bent 2000 2000 1 flowering plant Agrostis stolonifera Creeping Bent 1985 2017 3 flowering plant Ajuga reptans Bugle 2018 2018 1 flowering plant Alchemilla mollis Garden Lady's-mantle 2017 2017 1 flowering plant Alliaria petiolata Garlic Mustard 1985 2017 5 flowering plant Allium carinatum Keeled Garlic 2018 2018 1 flowering plant Allium paradoxum Few-flowered Garlic 1985 2017 3 flowering plant Allium schoenoprasum Chives 2019 2019 1 flowering plant Allium ursinum Ramsons 1985 2017 3 flowering plant Allium vineale Wild Onion 1984 1984 1 flowering plant Alnus incana Grey Alder 2007 2007 1 6 of 40 Glasgow Botanic Gardens 21/01/2021 Species List Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records flowering plant Alopecurus geniculatus Marsh Foxtail 2018 2018 1 flowering plant Alopecurus pratensis Meadow Foxtail 1985 1986 2 flowering plant Ammi majus Bullwort 2019 2019 1 flowering plant Anemone nemorosa Wood Anemone 2017 2019 2 flowering plant Anthoxanthum odoratum Sweet Vernal-grass 2017 2017 1 flowering plant Anthriscus sylvestris Cow Parsley 1985 2017 3 flowering plant Aphanes arvensis agg. Parsley Piert 2019 2019 1 flowering plant Aquilegia vulgaris Columbine 1985 1986 2 flowering
Recommended publications
  • Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition

    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition

    Sharon J. Collman WSU Snohomish County Extension Green Gardening Workshop October 21, 2015 Definition AKA exotic, alien, non-native, introduced, non-indigenous, or foreign sp. National Invasive Species Council definition: (1) “a non-native (alien) to the ecosystem” (2) “a species likely to cause economic or harm to human health or environment” Not all invasive species are foreign origin (Spartina, bullfrog) Not all foreign species are invasive (Most US ag species are not native) Definition increasingly includes exotic diseases (West Nile virus, anthrax etc.) Can include genetically modified/ engineered and transgenic organisms Executive Order 13112 (1999) Directed Federal agencies to make IS a priority, and: “Identify any actions which could affect the status of invasive species; use their respective programs & authorities to prevent introductions; detect & respond rapidly to invasions; monitor populations restore native species & habitats in invaded ecosystems conduct research; and promote public education.” Not authorize, fund, or carry out actions that cause/promote IS intro/spread Political, Social, Habitat, Ecological, Environmental, Economic, Health, Trade & Commerce, & Climate Change Considerations Historical Perspective Native Americans – Early explorers – Plant explorers in Europe Pioneers moving across the US Food - Plants – Stored products – Crops – renegade seed Animals – Insects – ants, slugs Travelers – gardeners exchanging plants with friends Invasive Species… …can also be moved by • Household goods • Vehicles
  • Notat 15 2019 I Pdf-Format

    Notat 15 2019 I Pdf-Format

    Dag-Inge Øien, Kaare Aagaard, Kai Berggren, Anette Grimsrud Davidsen og Karstein Hårsaker Kulturlandskap i Storlia, Leksvik Status for naturverdier i 2019 og revisjon av skjøtselsplan 15 - 2019 notat NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet naturhistorisk NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet naturhistorisk notat 2019-15 Dag-Inge Øien, Kaare Aagaard, Kai Berggren, Anette Grimsrud Davidsen og Karstein Hårsaker Kulturlandskap i Storlia, Leksvik Status for naturverdier i 2019 og revisjon av skjøtselsplan NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet naturhistorisk notat Dette er en elektronisk serie fra 2013 som erstatter tidligere Botanisk notat og Zoologisk notat. Serien er ikke periodisk, og antall nummer varierer per år. Notatserien benyttes til rapportering fra mindre prosjekter og utredninger, datadokumentasjon, statusrapporter, samt annet materiale som ikke har en endelig bearbeidelse. Tidligere utgivelser: http://www.ntnu.no/web/museum/publikasjoner Referanse Øien, D.-I., Aagaard, K., Berggren, K., Davidsen, A.G & Hårsaker, K. 2019. Kulturlandskap i Storlia, Leksvik. Status for naturverdier i 2019 og revisjon av skjøtselsplan. – NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet naturhistorisk notat 2019-15: 1-59. Trondheim, desember 2019 Utgiver NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet Institutt for naturhistorie 7491 Trondheim Telefon: 73 59 22 80 e-post: [email protected] Ansvarlig signatur Hans K. Stenøien (instituttleder) Publiseringstype Digitalt dokument (pdf) Forsidefoto Geitene trives i Storlia! Foto: D.-I. Øien 10.07.2019 www.ntnu.no/museum ISBN 978-82-8322-216-6 ISSN 1894-0064 2 Sammendrag Øien, D.-I., Aagaard, K., Berggren, K., Davidsen, A.G & Hårsaker, K. 2019. Kulturlandskap i Storlia, Leksvik. Status for naturverdier i 2019 og revisjon av skjøtselsplan. – NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet naturhistorisk notat 2019-15: 1-59. Storlia i Leksvik kommune har et rikt kulturlandskap med ugjødsla slåtte- og beitemarker i god hevd.
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T

    SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T

    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
  • The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin As a Refuge of the Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Within the City

    The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin As a Refuge of the Moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) Within the City

    Acta Biologica 23/2016 | www.wnus.edu.pl/ab | DOI: 10.18276/ab.2016.23-02 | strony 15–34 The Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Botanical Garden in Lublin as a refuge of the moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) within the city Łukasz Dawidowicz,1 Halina Kucharczyk2 Department of Zoology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Akademicka 19, 20-033 Lublin, Poland 1 e-mail: [email protected] 2 e-mail: [email protected] Keywords biodiversity, urban fauna, faunistics, city, species composition, rare species, conservation Abstract In 2012 and 2013, 418 species of moths at total were recorded in the Botanical Garden of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. The list comprises 116 species of Noctuidae (26.4% of the Polish fauna), 116 species of Geometridae (28.4% of the Polish fauna) and 63 species of other Macrolepidoptera representatives (27.9% of the Polish fauna). The remaining 123 species were represented by Microlepidoptera. Nearly 10% of the species were associated with wetland habitats, what constitutes a surprisingly large proportion in such an urbanised area. Comparing the obtained data with previous studies concerning Polish urban fauna of Lepidoptera, the moths assemblages in the Botanical Garden were the most similar to the one from the Natolin Forest Reserve which protects the legacy of Mazovian forests. Several recorded moths appertain to locally and rarely encountered species, as Stegania cararia, Melanthia procellata, Pasiphila chloerata, Eupithecia haworthiata, Horisme corticata, Xylomoia graminea, Polychrysia moneta. In the light of the conducted studies, the Botanical Garden in Lublin stands out as quite high biodiversity and can be regarded as a refuge for moths within the urban limits of Lublin.
  • Records and Descriptions of North American Crane-Flies (Diptera)

    Records and Descriptions of North American Crane-Flies (Diptera)

    Records and Descriptions of North American Crane-Flies (Diptera). Part III. Tipuloidea of the Upper Gunnison Valley, Colorado Charles P. Alexander American Midland Naturalist, Vol. 29, No. 1. (Jan., 1943), pp. 147-179. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0031%28194301%2929%3A1%3C147%3ARADONA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V American Midland Naturalist is currently published by The University of Notre Dame. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/notredame.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
  • University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Bucking the trend The diversity of Anthropocene 'winners' among British moths Boyes, Douglas H.; Fox, Richard; Shortall, Chris R.; Whittaker, Robert J. Published in: Frontiers of Biogeography DOI: 10.21425/F5FBG43862 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Boyes, D. H., Fox, R., Shortall, C. R., & Whittaker, R. J. (2019). Bucking the trend: The diversity of Anthropocene 'winners' among British moths. Frontiers of Biogeography, 11(3), 1-15. [3862]. https://doi.org/10.21425/F5FBG43862 Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 UC Merced Frontiers of Biogeography Title Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v Journal Frontiers of Biogeography, 11(3) Authors Boyes, Douglas H. Fox, Richard Shortall, Chris R. et al. Publication Date 2019 DOI 10.21425/F5FBG43862 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v#supplemental License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California a Frontiers of Biogeography 2019, 11.3, e43862 Frontiers of Biogeography RESEARCH ARTICLE the scientific journal of the International Biogeography Society Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Douglas H. Boyes1,*, Richard Fox2, Chris R. Shortall3 and Robert J. Whittaker1,4 1 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK; 2 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Dorset, BH20 5QP, UK; 3 Rothamsted Insect Survey, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK and 4 Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Malaise-Hyönteispyynti Lapin Suojelualueilla 2012–2014

    Malaise-Hyönteispyynti Lapin Suojelualueilla 2012–2014

    Jukka Salmela, Stefan Siivonen, Patrycja Dominiak, Antti Haarto, Kai Heller, Juhani Kanervo, Petri Martikainen, Matti Mäkilä, Lauri Paasivirta, Aki Rinne, Juha Salokannel, Guy Söderman ja Pekka Vilkamaa Malaise-hyönteispyynti Lapin suojelualueilla 2012–2014 Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja A 221 Jukka Salmela, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, jukka.salmela(at)metsa.fi Stefan Siivonen, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, stefan.siivonen(at)metsa.fi Patrycja Dominiak, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, University of Gdansk, heliocopris(at)gmail.com Antti Haarto, Mietoinen, ahaarto(at)gmail.com Kai Heller, Quickborn, kaiheller(at)gmx.de Juhani Kanervo, Turku, jussi.kanervo(at)luukku.com Petri Martikainen, Juva, petri.martikainen(at)uef.fi Matti Mäkilä, Rovaniemi, makila.entomology(at)gmail.com Lauri Paasivirta, Salo, lauri.paasivirta(at)suomi24.fi Aki Rinne, Helsinki, aki.rinne(at)pintakasittelytekniikka.fi Juha Salokannel, Tampere, juha.salokannel(at)gmail.com Guy Söderman, Helsinki, guy.soderman(at)pp.inet.fi Pekka Vilkamaa, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, pekka.vilkamaa(at)helsinki.fi Kansikuva: Malaise-pyydys Pallas–Yllästunturin kansallispuiston Röyninkurussa 2013. Lähteisten latvapurojen varret, varsinkin sellaiset joita ympäröi luonnontilainen havu- metsä, ovat monimuotoisia elinympäristöjä. Tältä paikalta havaittiin mm. Euroopalle uusi sienissääskilaji Mycetophila monstera, erittäin harvinainen pikkuvaaksiainen ou- taruskokirsikäs (Limonia messaurea) ja pohjoinen surviaissääski
  • Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung / C / 42 (1987)

    Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung / C / 42 (1987)

    1352 Notes (Z)-3-TetradecenyI Acetate as a Sex-Attractant species feed on Picea, Rumex and Rubus, respective­ Component in Gelechiinae and Anomologinae ly, and their relative trap captures greatly varied (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) between test sites, depending on host abundance; Ernst Priesner which may explain why one species (A. micella) was missing from the test by Willemse et al. Max-Planek-Institut für Verhaltensphysiologie. D-8131 Seewiesen The outstanding effectiveness of the Z3-14:Ac for Z. Naturforsch. 42c, 1352—1355 (1987); males of these gelechiid species was supported by received August 25, 1987 electroantennogram measurements. These were Sex-Attractant, Attraction-Inhibitor, J3-Alkenyl made from males newly taken in Z3-14:Ac baited A cetates, Chionodes, Monochroa, Argolamprotes, traps (with antennae not yet glued to the adhesive), Aproaerema, Gelechiidae using technical procedures as in other Microlepido- The title compound, unreported as an insect pheromone ptera [3, 4], In the series of (Z)- and (£)-alkenyl ace­ component, effectively attracted certain male Gelechiidae tates, varied for chain length and double bond posi­ (genera Chionodes, Monochroa, Argolamprotes) as a sin­ gle chemical. Trap captures with this chemical decreased tion, the Z3-14:Ac, at the test amount of 1 |ig, elic­ on addition of either (E)-3-dodecenyl acetate, (£)-3-tetra- ited the greatest EAG response. This was followed decenyl acetate or (Z)-3-tetradecen-l-ol, the sexual attrac- by the geometric isomer (.O-MiAc), the corre­ tants of other, closely related species. Results on an Aproaerem a test species showing a synergistic attraction sponding alcohol analogue (Z3-14:OH) and some response to combinations of (Z)-3-tetradecenyl acetate positional isomers and shorter-chain homologues with its homologue (Z)-3-dodecenyl acetate are included.
  • Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi (8.011Mb)

    Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi (8.011Mb)

    1 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) 2 T.C. GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Komisyonu Sonuç Raporu Proje No: 2008/26 Projenin Başlığı AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Proje Yöneticisi Prof.Dr. Kenan KARA Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı Araştırmacı Turgut ATAY Bitki Koruma Anabilim Dalı (Kasım / 2011) ÖZET* 3 AMASYA, SİVAS VE TOKAT İLLERİNİN KELKİT HAVZASINDAKİ FARKLI BÖCEK TAKIMLARINDA BULUNAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) TÜRLERİ ÜZERİNDE ÇALIŞMALAR Yapılan bu çalışma ile Amasya, Sivas ve Tokat illerinin Kelkit havzasına ait kısımlarında bulunan ve farklı böcek takımlarında parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae (Diptera) türleri, bunların tanımları ve yayılışlarının ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Bunun için farklı böcek takımlarına ait türler laboratuvarda kültüre alınarak parazitoit olarak yaşayan Tachinidae türleri elde edilmiştir. Kültüre alınan Lepidoptera takımına ait türler içerisinden, Euproctis chrysorrhoea (L.), Lymantria dispar (L.), Malacosoma neustrium (L.), Smyra dentinosa Freyer, Thaumetopoea solitaria Freyer, Thaumetopoea sp. ve Vanessa sp.,'den parazitoit elde edilmiş,
  • The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats

    The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats

    The Diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire: Craneflies and Winter Gnats by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] Version 1.1 26 November 2017 1 Summary This document provides a new checklist for the craneflies and winter gnats (Tipuloidea, Ptychopteridae and Trichoceridae) to extend the lists of the diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire first published by Kidd and Bindle in 1959. Overall statistics on recording activity are given by decade and hectad. Checklists are presented for each of the three Watsonian vice-counties 58, 59, and 60 detailing for each species the number of records, year of earliest and most recent record, and the number of hectads with records. A combined checklist showing distribution by the three vice-counties is also included, covering a total of 264 species, amounting to 75% of the current British checklist. Introduction This report is the third in a series to update and extend the partial checklist of the diptera of Lancashire and Cheshire published in 1959 by Leonard Kidd and Alan Brindle1. There were two previous updates, in 19642 and 19713. The previous reports in this series cover the soldierflies and allies4 and the Sepsidae5, the latter family not having been covered in Ref 1. The reader is referred to the first two reports for the background and rationale of these checklists, as well as the history of diptera recording and available data sources. The description of methodology is also kept to a minimum in the present report: only significant differences from the previous publications will be outlined.
  • The Moth Pollinators of Greater Butterfly Orchids Platanthera

    The Moth Pollinators of Greater Butterfly Orchids Platanthera

    JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 11 No. 1 (71) January 2014 The Moth Pollinators of Greater Butterfly Orchids Platanthera chlorantha in Central Scotland Roy Sexton With essential help from the following moth recorders: Stuart Bence, Claire Bird, Lorna Blackmore, Tim Brain, Michael Christie, Jennifer Davidson, Bob Dawson, John Knowler, Barbara Macritchie, John Oates, Tony Rogers, Melissa Shaw. In his book ‘T he Various Contrivances by which Orchids are Fertilised by Insects ’ Charles Darwin (1862; 1877) speculated that the Greater Butterfly Orchid (GBO) was pollinated by large night-flying moths. He based his proposal on the following observations: i) the flowers were white and so would show up at night ii) the floral scent to attract pollinators was produced nocturnally iii) the sugary nectar to reward insect visitors was found at the end of a 26mm long conical nectary or spur. This could only be reached by insects with long tongues like butterflies or moths. Careful examination of the structure of the flowers led Darwin to propose that when moths drank nectar the club-shaped masses of pollen positioned either side of the spur entrance became glued to their large com - pound eyes. He speculated that the pollen mass was repositioned as it dried and twist - ed so that it was deposited on the stigmas of the flowers which the moth visited subse - quently. Naturalists soon caught moths with GBO pollen on their eyes consistent with this hypothesis, but it was the meticulous studies of Anders Nilsson (1978) a century later that provided detailed scientific sup - port. It is his Swedish observations that I have attempted to confirm on Scottish plants.
  • Page 1 of 7 Moth Species List Froyle Records

    Page 1 of 7 Moth Species List Froyle Records

    Moth species list Froyle Records extracted 9th December 2012 from the moth databases held by the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Branch of Butterfly Conservation. Contains Lepidoptera records in the Froyle Parish, Hampshire. Taxon Vernacular Abrostola tripartita Spectacle Acasis viretata Yellow-barred Brindle Acleris forsskaleana Acleris variegana Garden Rose Tortrix Adaina microdactyla Adela rufimitrella Agapeta hamana Agonopterix arenella Agonopterix heracliana Agriopis leucophaearia Spring Usher Agriopis marginaria Dotted Border Agriphila straminella Agrochola lota Red-line Quaker Agrochola macilenta Yellow-line Quaker Agrotis exclamationis Heart and Dart Agrotis puta Shuttle-shaped Dart Alcis repandata Mottled Beauty Allophyes oxyacanthae Green-brindled Crescent Alucita hexadactyla Twenty-plume Moth Amblyptilia acanthadactyla Amphipyra pyramidea Copper Underwing Amphipyra pyramidea agg. Copper Underwing agg. Anthophila fabriciana Anticlea badiata Shoulder Stripe Anticlea derivata Streamer Apamea crenata Clouded-bordered Brindle Apamea epomidion Clouded Brindle Apamea monoglypha Dark Arches Apamea sordens Rustic Shoulder-knot Apeira syringaria Lilac Beauty Aphomia sociella Bee Moth Aplocera efformata Lesser Treble-bar Archips podana Large Fruit-tree Tortrix Asteroscopus sphinx Sprawler Autographa gamma Silver Y Autographa pulchrina Beautiful Golden Y Axylia putris Flame Batia unitella Biston betularia Peppered Moth Biston strataria Oak Beauty Blastobasis adustella Page 1 of 7 Blastobasis lacticolella Cabera exanthemata Common Wave Cabera