DOCSLIB.ORG

Role Theory As an Informative Lens for Understanding the Familial And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Role Theory As an Informative Lens for Understanding the Familial And Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses CAHSS Theses and Dissertations and Dissertations 1-1-2014 Role Theory as an informative lens for understanding the familial and political power struggles of Henry VIII and Mary I of England Niki Incorvia Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern University College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, please click here. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, History of Religion Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political History Commons, Political Science Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Religion Commons, and the Social History Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Niki Incorvia. 2014. Role Theory as an informative lens for understanding the familial and political power struggles of Henry VIII and Mary I of England. Doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences. (18) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd/18. This Dissertation is brought to you by the CAHSS Theses and Dissertations at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Role Theory as an informative lens for understanding the familial and political power struggles of Henry VIII and Mary I of England A Dissertation Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Niki Incorvia Nova Southeastern University 2014 Dedication In dedication to my three grandparents: Phil and Anna Incorvaia & Johanna Tsouris for all their loving support i Acknowledgements I would like to thank my committee members for their guidance, understanding and patience during my doctoral studies at Nova Southeastern University. Much gratitude extended to my dissertation chair, Dr. Tory Hansen, for all his unconditional support throughout this process. Dr. Hansen has remained consistent in his guidance and endeavors in assisting me to become the best scholar possible. I would also like to recognize Dr. Dustin Berna for his patience and feedback throughout the dissertation process. Dr. Berna has not only encouraged my work in the field, but has also encouraged my ability to think independently and critically. To Dr. Gary Gershman for assisting me in all matters of history and dedicating his time in teaching me the historical research methods used for in this study. Lastly, Dr. Marcia Sweedler has been a welcoming presence in DCAR since the moment I began the program; I am grateful for all the support during the entire doctoral process. In addition, I would like to acknowledge Richard Toumey for his assistance and dedication throughout my doctoral career and providing me with the foundation for becoming a confident writer and author. Richard was always available to meet me in support of my academic and non-academic endeavors as a writer and for that, I am eternally grateful. I would also like to thank the Department of Conflict Analysis and Resolution at Nova Southeastern University for the academic foundation in order to complete this doctoral degree. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Phil and Vivi, for their love and unconditional support throughout my entire life. Their devotion and support has laid the foundation of confidence that I have in myself today. I have always credited them with their incredibly warm and tolerable approach to raising three unique children. Their love and devotion to my career as a student has always been a driving force for me to produce the best possible product. ii Table of Contents Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………………........iii Biographical Reference of Characters…………………………………………………………..viii Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………....x Chapter 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………………………1 Story of the Conflict……………………………………………………………………….7 Role Theory and Role Conflict……………………………………………………………9 Primary Research Question………………………………………………………………11 Current Theories on Behavior…………………………………………………...……….11 Research Design………………………………………………………………………….15 Chapter 2: Review of the Content Literature: Henry Tudor……………………………..………20 Changes in Henry…………………………………………...……………………………22 Henry’s Execution of Anne Boleyn………………………………...……………………26 Chapter 3: Review of the Content Literature: Mary Tudor…………………………………...…34 Changes in Mary…………………………………………………………………………37 Mary’s Role Conflict…………………………………………………………………….40 Mary and Elizabeth………………………………………………………………………42 Chapter 4: Theoretical Framework…………………………………...………………………….48 George Mead’s Role Theory…………………………….……………………………….48 Meta-Roles……………………………………………………………………………….53 Game/Script Analysis Theory……………………………………………………………56 Max Weber’s Theory on Domination and Authority…………………………………….59 Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs…………………………………...………………………61 Conflict Transformation…………………………………………………………………64 Cruelty Defined………………………………………………………………………….66 iii Chapter 5: Methodology…………………………………………………………………………67 Primary Research Question……………………………………………………….……..67 Method of Analysis……………………………………………………………………....68 Tamboukou Model……………………………………………….……………………....69 Standard Historical Analysis……………………………………………………………..72 Data Analysis Plan……………………………………………………………………….74 Ethics and Reflexivity……………………………………………………………79 Confirmability……………………………………………………………………80 Trustworthiness……………………………………………………………….….80 Dependability…………………………………………………………………….81 Member-Checking……………………………………………………………….81 Credibility………………………………………………….…………………….82 Existing Theories………………………………………………………………...83 Henry Tudor……………………………………………………………...84 Mary Tudor…………………………………………...……………….....88 Expected Contributions of the Proposed Research………………………………….…...90 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….92 Chapter 6: Personal Transformation……………………………………………………………..94 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....94 Primary Sources………………………………………………………………………….96 Secondary Sources……………………………………………………………………...115 Historical Fiction Piece…………………………………………………………………133 Selected Biographies……………………………………………………………………135 Conclusion……………………………………………………………...………………143 iv Chapter 7: Religious Transformation…………………………………………………………...144 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..144 Primary Sources……………………………………………………………………...…148 Secondary Sources……………………………………………………………………...157 Historical Fiction Piece…………………………………………………………………164 Selected Biographies……………………………………………………………………165 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...………170 Chapter 8: Political Transformation…………………………………..………………………...167 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..171 Primary Sources………………………………………………...………………………175 Secondary Sources……………………………………………...………………………186 Historical Fiction Piece…………………………………………………………………188 Selected Biographies……………………………………………………………………189 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...194 Chapter 9: Sub-Themes and Meta-Themes……………………………………………………..195 Primary Sources………………………………………………………………………...195 Secondary Sources……………………………………………………………………...211 Selected Biographies……………………………………………………………………235 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...238 Themes Chart…………………………………………………………………...240 Chapter 10: Data Analysis and Presentation……………………………………………………241 Primary Research Question……………………………………………………………..242 Themes………………………………………………………………………………….242 v Findings and Applied Analysis…………………………………………………………243 Henry……………………………………………………………………………247 Anne as a catalyst for transformation......................................................249 Year of Personal Transformation……………………………………….250 Henry’s Psychosocial Meanings or Characteristics…………………….254 Transition to Mary………………………………………………………...……263 Mary…………………………………………………………………………….263 Henry and Mary’s Relationship………………………………………...264 Psychosocial Meanings for Mary……………………………………….266 Mary’s Vocation and Role Conflict…………………………………….267 Mary as Queen………………………………………………………….269 Mary and Elizabeth’s Relationship: A Role Conflict…………………..270 Additional Psychosocial Factors………………………………………..272 Psychosocial Meanings…………………………………………………………277 Revisionist Considerations……………………………………………………………...281 Trustworthiness of the Study…………………………………………………………...283 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………...……283 Chapter 11: Historical Model………………………………………………………………...…285 The Passage and Impasse Model……………………………………………………….287 Application of the Model……………………………………………………………….288 Gerry Adams……………………………………………………………………………295 Northern Ireland Conflict……………………………………………………………….295 Step One: Putting the Conflict into Context……………………………………297 vi Step Two: Identifying the first point of possible conflict transformation……...299 Step Three: Exploring Historical Significance ……………………………...…301 Step Four: Recognizing the next step towards conflict transformation………...304 Step Five: Further historical investigation into the conflict…………………….305 Step Six: Recognizing the final steps towards conflict transformation………...307 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...314 Chapter 12: Conclusions on the Historical Findings...…………………………………………316 Contributions of the Study…………………………………………………………...…322 Methodological Contributions………………………………………………………….326
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'All Wemen in Thar Degree Shuld to Thar Men Subiectit Be': the Controversial Court Career of Elisabeth Parr, Marchioness Of
    ‘All wemen in thar degree shuld to thar men subiectit be’: The controversial court career of Elisabeth Parr, marchioness of Northampton, c. 1547-1565 Helen Joanne Graham-Matheson, BA, MA. Thesis submitted to UCL for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Declaration I, Helen Joanne Graham-Matheson confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis reconstructs and analyses the life and agency of Elisabeth Parr, marchioness of Northampton (1526-1565), with the aim of increasing understanding of women’s networks of influence and political engagement at the mid-Tudor courts, c. 1547- 1565. Analysis of Elisabeth’s life highlights that in the absence of a Queen consort the noblewomen of the Edwardian court maintained and utilized access to those in power and those with political significance and authority. During the reign of Mary Tudor, Elisabeth worked with her natal family to undermine Mary’s Queenship and support Elizabeth Tudor, particularly by providing her with foreign intelligence. At the Elizabethan court Elisabeth regained her title (lost under Mary I) and occupied a position as one of the Queen’s most trusted confidantes and influential associates. Her agency merited attention from ambassadors and noblemen as well as from the Emperor Maximilian and King Erik of Sweden, due to the significant role she played in several major contemporary events, such as Elizabeth’s early marriage negotiations. This research is interdisciplinary, incorporating early modern social, political and cultural historiographies, gender studies, social anthropology, sociology and the study of early modern literature.
    [Show full text]
  • George Etheridge, Wyatt's Conspiracy
    George Etheridge, Wyatt’s Conspiracy (1557) Homeric Pastiche in Marian England 1. Introduction In Eton College Library resides a curious manuscript poem in Greek hexameters, composed for Queen Mary I (1516–58) by George Etheridge (1519–88), Regius Professor of Greek at Oxford. Completed in 1557, Etheridge’s poem, entitled Συνωμοσία Οὐέτου (hereafter Wyatt’s Conspiracy), survives uniquely in this neglected manuscript: it was never printed, has never been edited, and gives no indication of ever being read.1 Comprising a Latin prose preface and 369 lines of Greek hexameter, Etheridge’s text celebrates the quashing of Sir Thomas Wyatt the Younger’s Rebellion by Mary’s forces in the early months of 1554, reinscribes Etheridge’s allegiance to his royal patron (Mary), and parades his prodigious skill in Greek verse composition in the style of Homer. The poem, reconstructing the rebellion’s brief but climacteric engagements through a series of pseudo-epic set-pieces and imagined speeches, asserts Etheridge’s staunch Catholicism and reaffirms the legitimacy of Mary’s reign against heretical pretenders. It is remarkable not only as an overtly literary treatment of chronicle history sub specie Homeri, but also as a record of the synthetic processes that informed poetic Original orthography of early modern English texts has been lightly modernised: u/v and i/j distinctions are silently normalised, and English scribal contractions are expanded and reproduced as italics. All translations of Latin and Greek are mine, unless otherwise indicated. 1 George Etheridge, Συνωμοσία Οὐέτου [Wyatt’s Conspiracy], Windsor, Eton College Library, MS 148, fols 1r– 38r.
    [Show full text]
  • I 'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': a NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF
    'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN MID-TUDOR ENGLAND, 1547-1582 _____________ A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _____________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________ By Clarissa Elisabeth Hinojosa May 2014 i 'A MAN MOSTE MEETE': A NATIONWIDE SURVEY OF JUSTICES OF THE PEACE IN MID-TUDOR ENGLAND, 1547-1582 _____________ An Abstract of a Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History University of Houston _____________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _____________ By Clarissa Elisabeth Hinojosa May 2014 ii ABSTRACT This dissertation is a national study of English justices of the peace (JPs) in the mid- Tudor era. It incorporates comparable data from the reigns of Edward VI, Mary I, and the Elizabeth I. Much of the analysis is quantitative in nature: chapters compare the appointments of justices of the peace during the reigns of Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I, and reveal that purges of the commissions of the peace were far more common than is generally believed. Furthermore, purges appear to have been religiously- based, especially during the reign of Elizabeth I. There is a gap in the quantitative data beginning in 1569, only eleven years into Elizabeth I’s reign, which continues until 1584. In an effort to compensate for the loss of quantitative data, this dissertation analyzes a different primary source, William Lambarde’s guidebook for JPs, Eirenarcha. The fourth chapter makes particular use of Eirenarcha, exploring required duties both in and out of session, what technical and personal qualities were expected of JPs, and how well they lived up to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Mary I
    Queen Mary I Queen Mary I of England, also known as Mary Tudor, was one of the five monarchs from the famous Tudor family. Early Life Mary was born on 18th February 1516. She was the daughter of King Henry VIII and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon. Mary was a very clever child and was able to speak, read and write in many languages including Latin and Spanish. She was also very religious like her mother and followed the Catholic faith. In 1533, Henry decided to divorce Catherine as he was desperate for a son to be his heir. Mary was removed from her place in line to the throne, became known as ‘The Lady Mary’ rather than ‘Princess Mary’ and sent away from court. She was not allowed any contact with her mother as she would not accept her father’s new wife, Anne Boleyn, as queen. This hurt her relationship with her father and they did not speak for three years. Henry’s third wife, Jane, tried to make peace between Mary and her father. Mary agreed to the king’s request to recognise him as the head of the church and was reunited with her father in 1536. After Jane died, Henry married another three times. His final wife, Catherine Parr, persuaded the king to return Mary and Elizabeth to the line of succession in 1544. In 1547, Henry died and Mary’s half-brother Edward became king. During his reign, Mary spent most of her time away from court as she disagreed with laws he had passed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Seven Deadly Sins</Em>
    Early Theatre 10.1 (2007) ROBERT HORNBACK The Reasons of Misrule Revisited: Evangelical Appropriations of Carnival in Tudor Revels Undoubtedly the most arresting Tudor likeness in the National Portrait Gallery, London, is William Scrots’s anamorphosis (NPG1299). As if mod- eled after a funhouse mirror reflection, this colorful oil on panel painting depicts within a stretched oblong, framed within a thin horizontal rectangle, the profile of a child with red hair and a head far wider than it is tall; measur- ing 63 inches x 16 ¾ inches, the portrait itself is, the Gallery website reports, its ‘squattest’ (‘nearly 4 times wider than it is high’). Its short-lived sitter’s nose juts out, Pinocchio-like, under a low bump of overhanging brow, as the chin recedes cartoonishly under a marked overbite. The subject thus seems to prefigure the whimsical grotesques of Inigo Jones’s antimasques decades later rather than to depict, as it does, the heir apparent of Henry VIII. Such is underrated Flemish master Scrots’s tour de force portrait of a nine-year-old Prince Edward in 1546, a year before his accession. As the NPG website ex- plains, ‘[Edward] is shown in distorted perspective (anamorphosis) …. When viewed from the right,’ however, ie, from a small cut-out in that side of the frame, he can be ‘seen in correct perspective’.1 I want to suggest that this de- lightful anamorphic image, coupled with the Gallery’s dry commentary, pro- vides an ironic but apt metaphor for the critical tradition addressing Edward’s reign and its theatrical spectacle: only when viewed from a one-sided point of view – in hindsight, from the anachronistic vantage point of an Anglo-Amer- ican tradition inflected by subsequent protestantism – can the boy king, his often riotous court spectacle, and mid-Tudor evangelicals in general be made to resemble a ‘correct’ portrait of the protestant sobriety, indeed the dour puritanism, of later generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Elisabeth Parr's Renaissance at the Mid-Tudor Court
    Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2013, vol. 8 Elisabeth Parr’s Renaissance at the Mid-Tudor Court Helen Graham-Matheson oan Kelly’s ground-breaking article, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” Jcenters on four criteria for ascertaining the “relative contraction (or expansion) of the powers of Renaissance women”: women’s economic, political, cultural roles and the ideology about women across the mid- Tudor period. Focusing particularly on cultural and political roles, this essay applies Kelly’s criteria to Elisabeth Parr née Brooke, Marchioness of Northampton (1526–1565) and sister-in-law of Katherine Parr, Henry VIII’s last wife, whose controversial court career evinces women’s lived experience and their contemporary political importance across the mid- Tudor courts of Henry VIII, Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I. By taking each reign in isolation, this essay follows Kelly’s call to question “accepted schemes of periodization” and reassesses whether “events that further the historical development of men, liberating them from natural, social, or ideological constraints, have quite different, even opposite, effects upon women.”1 The key point of departure of my essay from Kelly’s argument is that she states that women’s involvement in the public sphere and politics lessened in the Italian cinquecento, whereas my findings suggest that in England women such as Elisabeth Parr increasingly involved themselves in the public world of court politics. According to Kelly, 1 Joan Kelly, ”Did Women Have a Renaissance?” Feminism and Renaissance Studies, ed. L. Hutson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 21. 289 290 EMWJ 2013, vol. 8 Helen Graham-Matheson [n]oblewomen .
    [Show full text]
  • Wren and the English Baroque
    What is English Baroque? • An architectural style promoted by Christopher Wren (1632-1723) that developed between the Great Fire (1666) and the Treaty of Utrecht (1713). It is associated with the new freedom of the Restoration following the Cromwell’s puritan restrictions and the Great Fire of London provided a blank canvas for architects. In France the repeal of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 revived religious conflict and caused many French Huguenot craftsmen to move to England. • In total Wren built 52 churches in London of which his most famous is St Paul’s Cathedral (1675-1711). Wren met Gian Lorenzo Bernini (1598-1680) in Paris in August 1665 and Wren’s later designs tempered the exuberant articulation of Bernini’s and Francesco Borromini’s (1599-1667) architecture in Italy with the sober, strict classical architecture of Inigo Jones. • The first truly Baroque English country house was Chatsworth, started in 1687 and designed by William Talman. • The culmination of English Baroque came with Sir John Vanbrugh (1664-1726) and Nicholas Hawksmoor (1661-1736), Castle Howard (1699, flamboyant assemble of restless masses), Blenheim Palace (1705, vast belvederes of massed stone with curious finials), and Appuldurcombe House, Isle of Wight (now in ruins). Vanburgh’s final work was Seaton Delaval Hall (1718, unique in its structural audacity). Vanburgh was a Restoration playwright and the English Baroque is a theatrical creation. In the early 18th century the English Baroque went out of fashion. It was associated with Toryism, the Continent and Popery by the dominant Protestant Whig aristocracy. The Whig Thomas Watson-Wentworth, 1st Marquess of Rockingham, built a Baroque house in the 1720s but criticism resulted in the huge new Palladian building, Wentworth Woodhouse, we see today.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne of Cleves
    Anne of Cleves Anne of Cleves was Henry VIII’s fourth wife and Queen of England for six months in 1540. Early Life Anne was born in 1515 in Düsseldorf in the Holy Roman Empire, in what is now Germany. She was the second daughter of John III, Duke of Cleves, and his wife, Maria. She had two sisters, Sibylle and Amalia, and a brother, William. While not very well educated, Anne was skilled at needlework and enjoyed playing card games. She could read and write but only in her native German. Marriage to Henry VIII After the death of Henry VIII’s third Despite this, Henry and Anne were wife in 1537, Henry’s advisors began married on 6th January 1540 at the asking him to consider marrying again. Palace of Placentia in London. His chief minister, Thomas Cromwell, The marriage was not a happy one suggested Henry consider marrying a from the start, with Henry saying to lady from Cleves, a growing power in Cromwell the day after their wedding, Europe. He suggested either Anne or ‘I liked her before not well, but now I her younger sister, Amalia. In order like her much worse.’ Despite Henry’s to persuade Henry, the artist Hans dislike of Anne, she always praised Holbein the Younger was sent to their him as a kind husband to those she home to paint portraits of both ladies. spoke with. Henry found Anne’s portrait to be pleasing and gave permission for a marriage contract to be drawn up. Henry first met Anne in person privately on New Year’s Day 1540 at Rochester Abbey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reformation of the Generations: Age, Ancestry and Memory in England 1500-1700
    The Reformation of the Generations: Age, Ancestry and Memory in England 1500-1700 Folger Shakespeare Library Spring Semester Seminar 2016 Alexandra Walsham (University of Cambridge): [email protected] The origins, impact and repercussions of the English Reformation have been the subject of lively debate. Although it is now widely recognised as a protracted process that extended over many decades and generations, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the links between the life cycle and religious change. Did age and ancestry matter during the English Reformation? To what extent did bonds of blood and kinship catalyse and complicate its path? And how did remembrance of these events evolve with the passage of the time and the succession of the generations? This seminar will investigate the connections between the histories of the family, the perception of the past, and England’s plural and fractious Reformations. It invites participants from a range of disciplinary backgrounds to explore how the religious revolutions and movements of the period shaped, and were shaped by, the horizontal relationships that early modern people formed with their sibilings, relatives and peers, as well as the vertical ones that tied them to their dead ancestors and future heirs. It will also consider the role of the Reformation in reconfiguring conceptions of memory, history and time itself. Schedule: The seminar will convene on Fridays 1-4.30pm, for 10 weeks from 5 February to 29 April 2016, excluding 18 March, 1 April and 15 April. In keeping with Folger tradition, there will be a tea break from 3.00 to 3.30pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Boleyn: Whore Or Martyr?
    Muhareb 1 Anne Boleyn: Whore or Martyr? An Individual’s Religious Beliefs Shaping the Perception of the Queen of England By Samia Muhareb Senior Thesis in History California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 9 June 2010 Grade: Advisor: Dr. Amanda Podany Muhareb 2 One of the most famous and influential English queen’s who altered society both politically and religiously was Anne Boleyn. The influence Anne Boleyn had on English society in the sixteenth century was summed up by historian Charles Beem, “our biggest enemy is terrorism…theirs was the Reformation. You can't overestimate how traumatic the changes in the church would have been. You might get close if you imagined that Monica Lewinsky had been a radical Islamist and Bill Clinton married her and made everyone convert.”1 Anne Boleyn was not the typical English Rose;2 she had an intense tempting quality that greatly attracted King Henry VIII. She was said to possess a delicate and attractive appearance, a vivacious personality, and exotic features since she was not brought up in the English court but rather the French to serve Queen Claude of France. To Henry, Anne symbolized the sophistication and charm of the French court he so earnestly desired.3 Anne Boleyn was the second wife of Henry VIII after his divorce from Katherine, a divorce that would revolutionize England as the country broke free from the Catholic Church and established the Church of England. Before King Henry VIII married Katherine of Aragon, Katherine was wedded to his elder brother Arthur in 1501. A year after their marriage, Arthur died; but the cause of death remains unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} the Six Wives of Henry VIII by Alison Weir the Six Wives of Henry VIII Summary & Study Guide
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Six Wives of Henry VIII by Alison Weir The Six Wives of Henry VIII Summary & Study Guide. The Six Wives of Henry VIII Summary & Study Guide Description. The Six Wives of Henry VIII Summary & Study Guide includes comprehensive information and analysis to help you understand the book. This study guide contains the following sections: This detailed literature summary also contains Topics for Discussion and a Free Quiz on The Six Wives of Henry VIII by Alison Weir (historian). This book chronicles the lives and relationships of the six wives of England's King Henry VIII, one of history's most well known monarchs. Rich with well-researched and meticulously documented historical detail, the book navigates the chronology of one of the most spiritually and politically volatile periods in English history while maintaining a clear focus on the personal experiences of the people living through it. Themes relating to the role of women in medieval society and the destructive power of certainty emerge as the author weaves a vivid tapestry of ambition, lust, loneliness, idealism, and the occasional glimpse of grace. A detailed chronology of the important events in the lives of Henry VIII and his six wives is followed by an introduction by the author, in which she summarizes both the general situation of women during Henry's time and the individual ways in which Henry's six wives lived within the confines of that situation. Part One, Katherine of Aragon, focuses on the early life of the Spanish princess Katherine, child of two great rulers who was betrothed while still an infant to Arthur, eldest child of the politically insecure king of England, Henry VII.
    [Show full text]