DOCSLIB.ORG

Vidzeme Planning Region, Reģ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vidzeme Planning Region, Reģ Move on Green Client: Vidzeme Planning Region, Reģ. Nr. 90002180246 Contractor: SIA “IMINK”, Reģ. Nr. 40003101441 Research Sustainable Transportation in Vidzeme, Part of the “Move on Green” project Research manager: Dr. inž. I. Niedole Riga, 2013 1 Move on Green TEAM COMPOSITION SIA “IMINK”: Dr. sc. ing. Ija Niedole LBS certificate Nr. 20-3428 Design of transportation, roads and traffic flows in the context of spatial planning. Evaluation of roads and street design projects. Construction management of streets and roads. Ph.Dc Geogr. Andis Kublačovs Dr. sc. ing. Arnis Lektauers Mg.sc. Ludmila Baltrusuna This research paper was completed in close collaboration with Vidzeme’s Planning Region personnel. 2 Move on Green Contents Team Composition ................................................................................................................................... 2 Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Tables ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 8 1. Rural Low Density Area of VPR ......................................................................................................... 8 1.1. Information Sources ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3. Main public and private iniatives foresse in the territory in the short term ................................ 10 2. Statistical data .................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Overall situation of Vidzeme Region .......................................................................................... 11 2.2. Demographic Structure ............................................................................................................... 20 2.3. Natural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 21 2.4. Labour Market Data .................................................................................................................... 27 2.5. Passenger transport infrastructure and resources ........................................................................ 30 2.5.1. Highway infrastructure and resources .................................................................................. 30 2.5.2. Railway infrastructure and resources ................................................................................... 43 2.5.3. Airport infrastructure and resources ..................................................................................... 47 2.5.4. Port infrastructure and resources .......................................................................................... 49 2.6. Mobility related energy consumption.......................................................................................... 50 3. Survey of Local Municipalities .......................................................................................................... 51 3.1 Review of local government survey ............................................................................................. 51 3.2 Systematization of Surveys’ Results ............................................................................................ 53 4. Interviews. Common list of public and private profiles to be interviewed ........................................ 55 4.1. List of interviewed persons ......................................................................................................... 55 4.2. Systematization of interviews ..................................................................................................... 56 5. Focus group discussions ..................................................................................................................... 68 5.1. Discussion process and scenario ................................................................................................. 68 5.2. Conclusion of the results for each focus group ........................................................................... 70 6. SWOT Analysis of the Transportation System of the Vidzemes Planning Region ........................... 76 7. Examples of good practice ................................................................................................................. 80 7.1. Public Transport Modelling System in Vidzeme ........................................................................ 80 7.2. Optimization possibilities of public transport route network in Vidzeme by taking into consideration the needs of population and public transport service providers ................................... 84 7.3. Narrow gauge railway in Aluksne and Gulbene and Gauja tram. ............................................... 94 7.4. Elektrobycicle trial Latvian Mobility Week 2012 ....................................................................... 96 Cited sources: ......................................................................................................................................... 98 Attachment - participant list of focus group meetings…………………………………………….......102 3 Move on Green FIGURES Figure 1. VPR geographical location .................................................................................................. 11 Figure 2. Territorial division of Latvia ................................................................................................ 12 Figure 3. VPR administrative territorial composition: VPR counties and parishes. ........................... 14 Figure 4. Population density in VPR counties (population per 1 km2) ............................................... 19 Figure 5. Location of natural resources in Vidzeme region. ............................................................... 21 Figure 6. Forests in Vidzeme region ................................................................................................... 22 Figure 7. Agricultural land in Vidzeme region ................................................................................... 23 Figure 8. Protected natural areas in the VPR ...................................................................................... 24 Figure 9. Significant tourist routes in Vidzeme .................................................................................. 26 Figure 10. % of unemployment economically active between the age of 15-64 years ....................... 28 Figure 11. Roadway infrastructure map of Latvia.. ............................................................................ 31 Figure 12. Vidzemes region transport infrastructure ........................................................................... 32 Figure 13. Vidzemes Planing Region roadways ................................................................................. 34 Figure 14. Railway infrastructure map of Latvia ................................................................................ 43 Figure 15. Railway map of Vidzemes Planning Region ..................................................................... 44 4 Move on Green TABLES Table 1: Information sources ................................................................................................................. 8 Table 2: Population density in the regions in 2012 (population per 1 km2) ...................................... 13 Table 3. List of counties and parishes of VPR .................................................................................... 15 Table 4. VPR population structure and dynamics ............................................................................... 15 Table 5. Population age groups ........................................................................................................... 20 Table 6. Labour market data ............................................................................................................... 27 Table 7. Education level in various sectors of industry, 2012............................................................. 27 Table 8. Unemployment level according to level of education in Vidzemes region, end of 2011, %. 29 Table 9. Unemployment rate structure according to industry %, 2011 according to population census data ...................................................................................................................................................... 29 Table 10. Road network (km) ............................................................................................................. 34 Table 11. VPR State road condition evaluation end 2012, km .......................................................... 35 Table 12. VPR State road length per 1000 inhabitants, end of 2012 .................................................. 35 Table 13. Number of vehicles in Latvia, VPR counties
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT June of LATVIA 2015 REPORT
    MINISTRY OF ECONOMICS REPUBLIC OF LATVIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT June OF LATVIA 2015 REPORT RIGA Ministry of Economics Republic of Latvia ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF LATVIA REPORT RIGA JUNE 2015 Comments, questions or suggestions are welcome: Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia Brīvības iela 55, Riga, LV-1519, Latvia Phone: 371-67013293 Fax: 371-67280882 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.em.gov.lv Authors: O.Barānovs (overall compilation, 1., 4.1.1.), I.Skribāne (2., 3.1.3., 4.3., 5.2.), E.Gergelevičs (2., 3.1.4.), J.Salmiņš (2., 3.2.1., 3.2.2., 3.3.), L.Stelmaka-Leja (3.1.1., 3.1.2, 4.1.2., 4.1.3., 5.2.), G.Piņķe (3.3.), I.Šnīdere (4.2.), V.Skuja (4.4.), N.Ozols (5.1., 5.3.), A.Rožkalne, J.Ušpelis (5.4.), Č.Gržibovskis, R.Rimša (6.1.), G.Silovs (6.2.1., 6.8., 6.12.), D.Klinsone, M.Rone, L.Stauvere, D.Šikova (6.2.2.), M.Ivanova, V.Laizāns, A.Upīte (6.2.3.), K.Soms (6.3.), A.Leite, R.Meijers, I.Niedrīte (6.4.), R.Kņūtiņa, S.Soila, I.Strazdiņa, R.Špade (6.5.), M.Lūka, I.Šīrava (6.6), I.Lore (6.7., 6.8.), E.Fernāts (6.8., 6.12.), M.Jansons (6.9.), L.Neiders, (6.10.), I.Kabanova (6.11.), A.Krūze, M.Zondaks (6.12.), M.Ivanova, L.Kauliņa (6.13.), B.Mistre, J.Reinsone (6.14.), M.Drāke (6.15., 6.16.), D.Freimane (6.17.). All figures and data, unless indicated otherwise, have been obtained from the Central Statistical Bureau of the Republic of Latvia.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for Vidzeme Region
    Cult ural Routes as Investments for Growth and Jobs Action Plan for Vidzeme Region December 2018 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs _________________________ © Cult-RInG Project Partnership and Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-RInG Project Communication and the respective partner: Vidzeme Tourism Association. Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-RInG Action Plan, Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia Cult-RInG project communication unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source on e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Vidzeme Tourism Association and in no way reflect the views of the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user. The Cult-RInG project partnership assumes no responsibility for any consequences arising from use of the information described within this document. December 2018 Action Plan 2 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs Interreg Europe Programme Interreg Europe Programme of interregional cooperation helps regional and local governments across Europe to develop and deliver better policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan for Digital Growth 2022” Different Local Stakeholders Were Involved in Discussions, Meetings, Local Events and in Techtown International Visits
    Introduction 3 Cēsis context 4 Digital Ecosystem 7 Digital Growth 9 Problem statement and objective 10 Priorities 11 Actions and indicators 13 Governance 23 Capitalization and Monitoring 24 Authors: Evija Taurene, Cēsis municipality Development and building department Edīte Matuseviča, Cēsis municipality Communication and Client Service department TechTown Cēsis Local Action Group 2 (Expert Group on Taxation of the Digital Economy, European Commission, 2013) On national level, the digital economy is seen as an increasingly important part of business development in Latvia, with a vivid start-up scene and exciting international happenings in the nation’s capital Riga and “Start- ups law” developed in 2017. The sector is cited in a number of important national documents including 'Development of Smart Specialization Strategy', and the 'Sustainable Long-Term Strategy for Latvia to 2030', however there is no digital strategy on the national level. Recognising the rapidly changing nature of the Economy, Cēsis municipality has included Digital industries among the most important economic sectors in its “Strategy for long term development 2015-2030”. In September 2015 Cēsis municipality joined TechTown – an URBACT III Action Planning network of 11 small and medium sized cities from the EU on the mission to understand the present and future of digital economy and strive to grow digital jobs. In order to grasp the topic, TechTown looked more closely into several topics: Better understanding the digital economy; Growing Digital Jobs (through start-ups, through transformation of traditional industry, smart city agenda, and providing spaces and places for connections); Finding, growing, retaining and returning talent; and Governance. 3 Cēsis is a town about 85 km East of Riga in the Centre of Latvia, well connected to the major cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurzeme CREATIVE Kurzeme
    CREATIVE Kurzeme CREATIVE Kurzeme LATVIA THE CENTERS OF CREATIVE INDUSTRIES Latvia is a small country in Northern International practice shows - Europe, with little more than 2 million creative industries are evolving and inhabitants. In our short period of developing in urban environments. independence we have proven to be Riga, the capital and its suburbs a strong and creative nation. contribute almost 80% to Latvia’s Although it’s a relatively new sector creative economy. The biggest of the economy, at the state level number of creative companies are innovations and creative industries registered and operate in this are perceived as the basis for the territory. future economic growth. Creativity that comes from culture and arts The number of creative and support sector enterprises in Regions and Rīga (2011). CSP data. combined with business knowledge is a key resource for the economic growth by creating products with high added value. Still the Kurzeme Region has a good basis for growth for creative industries with 5 KURZEME regional towns that have an average of high creative potential. Currently, creative industries play a role in shaping the economic structure in the three biggest towns Its long sea border with large and small harbors, sandy beaches, coastal fishing - Liepāja, Ventspils and Kuldīga. In each of these municipalities more than 20 villages and towns historically determines the uniqueness of the Kurzeme Region. creative enterprises are registered. In the Saldus and Talsu municipalities The two port towns - Liepāja and Ventspils are regional and national development respectively 15 to 17 entrepreneurs are registered and operate. In the remaining centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges of Small and Medium-‐Sized Urban Areas (Smuas)
    Challenges of Small and Medium-Sized Urban Areas (SMUAs), their economic growth potential and impact on territorial development in the European Union and Latvia Research report to support the Latvian EU Presidency 2015 This paper has been written by HESPI and EUKN and consulted by ESPON on behalf of the Latvian Presidency of the Council of the European Union (The Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development). The research is financed by the Norwegian financial instrument programme 2009-2014 No. LV07 “Strengthening of capacity and institutional cooperation between Latvian and Norwegian institutions, local and regional institutions“ Project No 4.3.-24/NFI/INP-002. Final Report, 25 May, 2015 Social, Economic and Humanities Research Institute (HESPI) of Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences Cēsu iela 4, | Valmiera, LV-4201 | Latvia Tel. + 371 64207230 | www.va.lv/en/hespi Contact: Agita Līviņa, Director of HESPI European Urban Knowledge Network EGTC Koningin Julianaplein 10 | 2495 AA The Hague | Netherlands Tel. +31 703028484 | www.eukn.eu Contact: Mart Grisel, Director of EUKN EGTC 1 List of Authors Visvaldis Valtenbergs (HESPI), Alfons Fermin (EUKN), Mart Grisel (EUKN), Lorris Servillo (ESPON), Inga Vilka (University of Latvia, Faculty of Economics and Management), Agita Līviņa (HESPI), Līga Bērzkalne (HESPI). Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 3 List of Boxes, Figures Tables and Maps ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • D4.4 Needs-Policy Canvas
    D4.4 Needs-Policy Canvas Project PoliRural ProjectAcronym: title: Future Oriented Collaborative Policy Development for Rural Areas and People Grant 818496 Agreement Website: www.polirural.eu No. Contact: [email protected] Version: 1.0 Date: 27 May 2020 Responsible: HAMK ContributingPartner: : CZU, NUVIT, City Nitra, VIPA, SK, NP, AUA, SPI, MIGAL, Innovagritech, CKA, JIIP, Partners: VITO, AGFutura, TRAGSA, SocialInnolabs, ERDN, MAC, CONF, GGP, LLF Reviewers: Luigi Boccaccio (MurgiaPiu), Zuzana Palkova and Marieta Okenkova (SUA) Disseminatio Public X n Level: Confidential - only consortium members and European Commission Services Keywords: Rural needs, rural policy, policy mapping, rural development This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 818496 D4.4 Needs-Policy Canvas Revision History Revision Date Author Organization Description no. Petra Korkiakoski, First version of the deliverable, guidelines for 0.1 13/3/2020 HAMK Sanna pilot work Lento Petra Change to internal reviewers due to staff 0.2 17/04/2020 HAMK Korkiakoski changes. Petra 0.3 28/04/2020 HAMK Updates to chapter 3.8. Korkiakoski John Input Monaghan Ireland Pilot information in 0.31 08/05/2020 MAC O’Flaherty section 3.2. Petra Combining chapters 2.3 and 2.4. Editing 0.4 08/05/2020 HAMK Korkiakoski headlines in chapter 3. Anita Input Vidzeme (Latvia) Pilot information in 0.41 12/05/2020 LRF Seļicka section 3.4. Paweł Input Mazowieckie (Poland) Pilot information 0.42 12/05/2020 ERDN Chmieliński in section 3.5 Petra Updating pilot inputs to chapter 3, edits to 0.5 15/05/2020 HAMK Korkiakoski chapter 2 and 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report on the technical and financial implementation of the PrepAGE Project: Enhancing disaster management and preparedness for the older population in the EU Grant Agreement: ECHO/SUB/2013/661043 covering the project activities from: 01/04/2014 – 31/5/2016 Final Report Reporting date 29.07.2016 Compiled by Charlotte Strümpel, Cornelia Hackl, Austrian Red Cross Table of Contents 1) General reminder of project objectives, partnership and expected deliverables .......................... 3 2) General summary of project implementation process ................................................................... 5 3) Evaluation of project management/implementation process ...................................................... 10 4) Activities ........................................................................................................................................ 13 5) Presentation of technical results and deliverables ....................................................................... 22 6) Evaluation of technical results and deliverables ........................................................................... 38 7) Follow-up ....................................................................................................................................... 43 8) Annex ............................................................................................................................................. 46 PrepAGE Final Report Page 2 General reminder of project objectives, partnership and expected deliverables
    [Show full text]
  • Here Our Move on Green Good Practices Guide
    Move on Green GOOD PRACTICES COLLECTION ON SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY IN RURAL EU C3, Phase 1 Move on Green INDEX 0. SUMMARY CHART OF GOOD PRACTICES EXCHANGED IN MOG. .......................... 3 1. GOOD PRACTICES IN “COMBINATION OF DIFFERENT SERVICES FOR COST REDUCTION. ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1. KombiBus: How existing public transport capacity in rural areas can be utilized for other services. P13-Brandenburg. ................................................................................... 5 1.2. PIMMS: Several services grouped in the same place. P6-Euromontana. ........................ 8 1.3. Mobile mail service: P7-Central Transdanubian. ............................................................ 11 2. GOOD PRACTICES IN “CAR-SHARING, CAR-POOLING AND OTHER “SHARING” FORMULAS”. ........................................................................................... 13 2.1. Wigtownshire Community Transport: vehicle sharing to reduce underutilisation of vehicles. P5-Shetlans Islands. ....................................................................................... 16 2.2. Carpooling in Poland. P12-Podkarpackie. ...................................................................... 18 2.3. FLINC: Utilisation and Promotion of the ride-share system “flinc” in two rural regions in the state of Brandenburg. P13-Brandenburg. ................................................ 20 2.4. The Village Bus in Kolsillre: passengers do the timetable via a website;
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Latvian Latridiidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) Andris Bukejsa, Dmitry Telnovb & Wolfgang H
    This article was downloaded by: [Andris Bukejs] On: 12 December 2013, At: 23:47 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Zoology and Ecology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tzec20 Catalogue of Latvian Latridiidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) Andris Bukejsa, Dmitry Telnovb & Wolfgang H. Rückerc a Vienības iela 42-29, Daugavpils LV-5401, Latvia b Stopiņu novads, Dārza iela 10, Dzidriņas LV-2130, Latvia c Von-Ebner-Eschenbach-Straße 12, Neuwied D-56567, Germany Published online: 27 Nov 2013. To cite this article: Andris Bukejs, Dmitry Telnov & Wolfgang H. Rücker (2013) Catalogue of Latvian Latridiidae (Insecta: Coleoptera), Zoology and Ecology, 23:4, 312-322, DOI: 10.1080/21658005.2013.862060 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2013.862060 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Noise Management in Latvia
    UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY AND EARTH SCIENCES Zanda Krūkle ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MANAGEMENT IN LATVIA DOCTORAL THESIS Submitted for the scientific doctor's degree - doctor of science (Ph.D.) in earth sciences, physical geography, environmental sciences Scientific advisor: Assist. Prof., Dr. phys. Rūta Bendere Rīga, 2020 1 The doctoral thesis was carried out in the Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences over the period from 2010 to 2020. Scientific advisor: Dr. phys., Assist. Prof. Rūta Bendere, University of Latvia Reviewers: Dr. geogr., Assoc. Prof. Iveta Šteinberga, University of Latvia Dr. sc. ing., Prof. Ritvars Sudārs, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies Dr. techn., Prof. Linas Kliučininkas, Kaunas University of Technology Doctoral Committee: Dr. biol., Prof. Viesturs Melecis, University of Latvia, chairman of the Committee Dr. geogr., Prof. Oļģerts Nikodemus, University of Latvia Dr. habil. chem., Prof. Māris Kļaviņš, University of Latvia Dr. geogr., Assoc. Prof. Iveta Šteinberga, University of Latvia Dr. habil. paed., Prof. Raimonds Ernšteins, University of Latvia Dr. sc. ing., Prof. Gatis Bažbauers, Rīga Technical university Dr. geog., Assist. Prof. Oskars Purmalis, University of Latvia, secretary of the Committee The defence of the doctoral thesis will be held on the 12th of June, 2020 at 12:00 in a public session of the Doctoral Committee at the Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences of the University of Latvia, 1 Jelgavas iela, Rīga. The dissertation is available at the Scientific Library of the University of Latvia, 4 Kalpaka blvd. References should be addressed to Dr. biol. Viesturs Melecis, University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, 19 Raiņa blvd, LV-1586, Rīga.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Indicators for Sustainable Development of Small Towns: the Case of Valmiera Municipality
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Computer Science 26 ( 2013 ) 21 – 32 ICTE in Regional Development, December 2013, Valmiera, Latvia Selecting indicators for sustainable development of small towns: The case of Valmiera municipality Valtenbergs Visvaldisa*, González Ainhoab, Piziks Ralfsc a Sociotechnical Systems Engineering Institute of Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences, Cesu Street 4, Valmiera, LV-4200, Latvia b National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis International Centre for Local and Regional Development National University of Ireland Maynooth c Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences, Latvia Abstract Although much has been written about sustainable development of cities, the debate over the role of small towns as engines in rural development is just beginning to emerge. In the light of the post-recession austerity climate and new a planning period of EU Cohesion Policy it is important to examine the strategic dimensions of sustainable town development. The paper proposes and applies methodology for selecting sustainable development indicators. The study presents a case study of the town Valmiera in North Eastern Latvia. During a stakeholder facilitated indicator selection process 108 indicators from economic, environmental and social dimensions were assessed and filtered leading to a key indicator set of 15. The indicators are grouped according to development themes and reviewed in the light of conceptual and implementation qualities. Review of the sustainable development indicators and the methodology of indicator selection proposed in this publication constitute inputs for creating future based models of sustainable small town development. © 2013 TheThe Authors. Authors. Published Published by by Elsevier Elsevier B.V. B.V. Selection andand peer-review peer-review under under responsibility responsibility of ofthe the Sociotechnical Sociotechnical Systems Systems Engineering Engineering Institute Institute of Vidzeme of Vidzeme University University of Appliedof Applied Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • NB Mobility Programme for Public Administration 2014 Decision Nr
    NB Mobility Programme for Public Administration 2014 Decision Participatin Nr Project title Applicant g € Countries Cooperation and sharing of the working PA-GRO- experience between Baltic and Nordic document Police and Border Guard Board, EE experts in the preparation of methodological NO, IS 6,000.00 € 672 instructions and to develop Estonian False (Kerstin Kirsel) Documents Database PA-GRO- Nordic-Baltic mobility program Hämeenlinna Prison, ministry of EE, LT 2,100.00 € 671 Justice Finland, FI (samuli laulumaa) Study visit for cooperation and knowledge PA-GRO- Estonian Health Board, EE (Eed 670 exchange with the best practices in the field of Allik-Hõimoja) IS, DK 4,000.00 € ambulance service PA-GRO- Exchange of knowledge and experiences Association of Local Authorities of between municipalities of Järva County and Håbo DK 0.00 € 669 and Frederiksborg municipality Järva County, EE (Toomas Tippi) Nordic Experience Transfer through Study Visits, PA-GRO- Auce Local Municipality, LV (Sandra 668 Networking and Best Prctices to Raise Zesere) NO, IS 4,000.00 € Administrative Capacity of Municipality PA-GRO- Creative industry as engine for community Ida-Viru County Government, EE FI, DK 4,000.00 € 667 development in Denmark, Finland and Estonia (Jana Pavlenkova) PA-GRO- Exchange of knowledge and good practices Ministry of Social Affairs, EE (Kaisa FI, IS 7,000.00 € 666 between Estonia and Nordic countries Kaha) “Implementation of Sustainable Solutions for PA-GRO- Electronic Data Archive Information, The State Land Service, LV (Lelde 665 Communication
    [Show full text]