DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration MERCHANT FLEETS OF THE WORLD PRIVATELY-OWNED, OCEANGOING MERCHANT VESSELS OF 1,000 GROSS TONS AND OVER AS OF JANUARY 1, 2016 *Includes Government-owned ships (U.S. and Foreign-Flag) Please refer to the Data Notes provided on the MARAD Data & Statistics Page for more information Source: IHS Markit Lloyds Maritime Database Files Grand Total Container Dry Bulk General Cargo LNG/LPG Passenger Ro-Ro Tanker Registry Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT United States of America 337 9,400,648 10,616,525 69 2,848,323 3,101,484 47 974,120 1,893,394 21 294,276 288,986 83 436,546 94,661 63 2,567,241 1,419,010 54 2,280,142 3,818,990 Privately-Owned Merchant Fleet 167 6,648,597 7,782,930 63 2,744,436 2,998,326 6 158,936 260,045 17 153,008 179,042 28 1,339,124 577,233 53 2,253,093 3,768,284 Jones Act Eligible 90 3,250,891 4,562,872 23 656,309 696,122 3 72,502 107,031 7 14,319 10,604 9 373,251 177,462 48 2,134,510 3,571,653 Non Jones-Act Eligible 77 3,397,706 3,220,058 40 2,088,127 2,302,204 3 86,434 153,014 10 138,689 168,438 19 965,873 399,771 5 118,583 196,631 Great Lakes Trading 41 815,184 1,633,349 41 815,184 1,633,349 Passenger/Ferry 83 436,546 94,661 83 436,546 94,661 Ready Reserve Fleet 46 1,500,321 1,105,585 6 103,887 103,158 4 141,268 109,944 35 1,228,117 841,777 1 27,049 50,706 FOREIGN REGISTRIES Grand Total Container Dry Bulk General Cargo LNG/LPG Passenger Ro-Ro Tanker Registry Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Number of Ships GT DWT Albania 14 29,365 43,301 13 27,867 41,066 1 1,498 2,235 Algeria 26 657,318 639,641 1 37,327 64,698 6 51,512 63,065 10 491,168 478,562 3 61,707 12,165 6 15,604 21,151 Angola 8 10,401 14,659 1 1,199 2,260 2 2,000 609 1 1,302 2,063 4 5,900 9,727 Antigua & Barbuda 992 8,628,343 11,121,727 279 3,976,776 4,945,041 35 787,433 1,323,127 645 3,551,719 4,578,072 15 102,417 122,468 11 165,586 87,690 7 44,412 65,329 Argentina 32 292,470 484,807 2 25,567 33,299 5 19,257 36,438 3 6,440 877 22 241,206 414,193 Australia 48 746,865 576,356 5 37,900 47,601 16 112,100 151,832 4 420,040 267,148 11 74,314 16,810 4 62,579 36,782 8 39,932 56,183 Azerbaijan 69 366,456 394,111 1 2,615 3,280 18 57,775 69,289 9 79,421 29,122 7 57,162 39,370 34 169,483 253,050 Bahamas 1,141 52,483,094 67,553,798 51 1,298,896 1,451,407 268 9,293,892 16,353,965 204 3,112,973 4,410,299 99 7,977,320 6,628,583 133 7,083,696 726,684 77 3,817,695 1,330,901 309 19,898,622 36,651,959 Bahrain 12 211,079 256,916 3 158,329 179,952 9 52,750 76,964 Bangladesh 81 858,606 1,477,737 4 7,493 8,530 26 653,182 1,146,050 34 109,428 165,264 17 88,503 157,893 Barbados 92 756,832 1,181,706 19 384,329 658,554 68 245,673 326,197 2 18,765 8,695 3 108,065 188,260 Belgium 93 4,873,764 7,863,874 18 1,292,272 2,471,967 9 19,092 27,336 22 1,248,812 1,129,385 2 5,033 350 9 168,471 72,762 33 2,140,084 4,162,074 Belize 250 1,575,549 2,371,258 3 11,729 15,391 68 863,321 1,446,878 158 594,403 806,475 1 1,605 1,294 4 46,773 16,513 16 57,718 84,707 Bermuda (British) 129 9,906,311 8,919,353 5 179,480 184,079 11 979,621 1,932,208 49 4,910,853 3,941,370 27 2,393,663 227,020 37 1,442,694 2,634,676 Bolivia 22 57,501 78,614 6 19,081 35,180 11 28,957 37,187 2 3,390 1,145 3 6,073 5,102 Brazil 87 2,190,895 3,518,365 17 546,561 692,155 11 324,725 569,865 9 51,660 69,931 10 68,983 71,088 1 1,029 282 1 5,119 5,287 38 1,192,818 2,109,757 Brunei 8 615,780 497,862 7 610,835 491,593 1 4,945 6,269 Bulgaria 12 112,604 98,805 5 36,754 53,746 2 4,406 3,800 1 25,028 8,058 3 44,720 30,673 1 1,696 2,528 Cambodia 362 1,121,055 1,473,032 4 12,340 17,659 25 146,727 232,557 315 890,855 1,149,052 1 6,850 1,118 7 35,785 25,857 10 28,498 46,789 Canada 158 2,178,330 2,700,130 2 16,385 16,657 54 1,090,177 1,653,960 9 52,058 75,335 62 462,040 94,092 7 80,013 53,733 24 477,657 806,353 Cape Verde 9 20,319 14,482 2 3,790 5,887 4 9,727 2,085 1 3,910 2,560 2 2,892 3,950 Cayman Islands (British) 118 3,330,592 4,391,122 26 826,347 1,390,242 3 23,002 36,748 1 5,937 1,000 16 903,466 284,990 72 1,571,840 2,678,142 Chile 48 607,930 944,405 3 29,777 38,206 9 213,654 360,249 13 32,789 41,317 10 41,502 9,606 13 290,208 495,027 China 2,143 41,339,938 64,962,740 185 5,563,844 6,727,202 843 23,656,520 40,774,910 452 2,957,496 4,106,250 69 241,114 218,141 95 1,084,700 307,954 28 401,423 149,189 471 7,434,841 12,679,094 Colombia 12 36,411 53,726 7 21,357 29,310 5 15,054 24,416 Congo (Democratic Republic) 11 23,629 30,146 9 21,185 28,108 1 1,440 398 1 1,004 1,640 Cook Islands 125 1,231,282 2,005,068 5 24,847 32,834 21 558,928 963,068 87 605,565 956,567 2 9,227 1,529 10 32,715 51,070 Costa Rica 2 2,395 1,322 2 2,395 1,322 Croatia 65 1,218,424 2,022,536 17 516,448 919,748 2 5,179 7,081 30 101,612 23,805 16 595,185 1,071,902 Cuba 3 3,965 5,378 3 3,965 5,378 Curacao 49 941,273 1,177,099 48 933,959 1,167,715 1 7,314 9,384 Cyprus 799 20,504,818 32,520,442 184 3,975,135 4,748,642 308 11,729,145 21,269,121 154 961,350 1,329,492 6 379,667 237,324 40 576,320 131,817 10 151,089 58,205 97 2,732,112 4,745,841 Denmark 18 80,332 13,740 18 80,332 13,740 Denmark (DIS) 348 14,825,776 16,905,673 116 10,574,258 11,436,515 7 198,272 357,648 25 48,901 60,003 11 383,971 353,662 22 400,883 63,777 15 425,680 186,265 152 2,793,811 4,447,803 Djibouti 1 3,125 5,300 1 3,125 5,300 Dominica 19 426,572 775,065 6 19,940 21,800 13 406,632 753,265 Ecuador 43 253,070 388,676 3 6,749 6,797 10 22,522 5,539 30 223,799 376,340 Egypt 49 842,647 1,310,297 5 76,881 96,620 12 468,702 836,457 13 83,524 113,238 4 20,324 3,896 7 61,734 30,988 8 131,482 229,098 Equatorial Guinea 6 18,606 26,940 1 7,361 9,203 1 1,412 1,740 4 9,833 15,997 Eritrea 4 11,126 12,757 2 5,179 7,010 1 3,922 2,570 1 2,025 3,177 Estonia 19 367,973 65,118 16 361,613 55,509 3 6,360 9,609 Ethiopia 15 289,643 397,555 13 235,989 313,215 2 53,654 84,340 Faeroe Islands (Danish) 15 167,008 165,043 3 8,840 10,785 3 49,896 9,065 2 18,264 8,800 7 90,008 136,393 Faeroes (FAS) 36 120,796 162,794 2 17,660 22,286 1 2,429 3,961 30 89,776 125,004 2 9,246 8,830 1 1,685 2,713 Fiji 13 31,080 9,398 1 1,261 1,543 11 28,338 6,802 1 1,481 1,053 Finland 91 1,546,052 1,005,186 3 28,761 36,949 3 82,757 133,195 24 106,560 140,571 20 554,922 89,291 35 592,754 313,322 6 180,298 291,858 France 67 1,066,265 395,945 1 175,688 186,528 2 5,800 7,520 9 15,848 13,506 47 833,089 161,854 3 25,052 8,857 5 10,788 17,680 France (FIS) 64 4,338,130 6,173,985 23 1,973,537 2,177,659 6 337,338 301,213 7 108,974 48,471 28 1,918,281 3,646,642 Gabon 1 1,015 1,373 1 1,015 1,373 Gambia 1 1,511 1,766 1 1,511 1,766 Georgia 3 30,259 50,012 1 20,306 34,318 2 9,953 15,694 Germany 229 9,990,267 11,044,849 130 9,104,501 9,949,576 1 155,051 322,398 38 124,515 156,080 1 4,201 4,197 25 225,934 47,499 1 1,868 2,673 33 374,197 562,426 Ghana 6 18,035 23,621 3 10,962 15,256 3 7,073 8,365 Gibraltar (British) 249 2,779,558 3,259,011 31 655,796 831,586 8 312,184 552,905 106 393,405 526,945 4 86,240 101,538 14 650,223 234,977 86 681,710 1,011,060 Greece 748 40,522,812 72,000,613 10 847,488 906,957 234 12,655,197 23,799,082 22 37,104 48,726 27 1,819,693 1,620,465 84 846,628 197,045 8 171,558 66,110 363 24,145,144 45,362,228 Guyana 11 20,515 27,948 9 15,500 20,488 2 5,015 7,460 Honduras 28 77,325 96,826 2 6,642 11,704 10 29,063 37,569 2 3,896 2,785 2 4,270 2,842 12 33,454 41,926 Hong Kong 2,238 101,389,102 163,588,980 472 26,420,745 29,572,210 1,084 50,036,657 91,541,021 261 3,959,111 5,544,145 37 1,509,492 1,476,626 5 32,337 7,160 7 209,977 81,651 372 19,220,783 35,366,167 Iceland 2 5,031 580 2 5,031 580 India 413 8,560,157 14,707,865 15 305,167 392,049 87 2,661,855 4,784,868 173 331,336 497,459 17 399,356 504,237 23 164,020 48,217 1 19,683 13,925 97 4,678,740 8,467,110 Indonesia 1,870 11,117,841 15,206,755 173 1,299,760 1,696,554 124 1,636,501 2,788,033 828 2,317,671 3,142,519 51 854,740 881,248 193 844,695 234,442 31 210,828 118,477 470 3,953,646 6,345,482 Iran 169 2,972,968 4,495,855 28 1,007,884 1,215,800 34 1,170,357 2,036,068 94 425,568 566,784 3 6,599 2,136 2 3,701 1,468 8 358,859 673,599 Iraq 5 35,853 54,201 5 35,853 54,201 Irish Republic 32 194,770 300,291 2 45,736 69,824 30 149,034 230,467 Isle of Man (British) 311 13,578,155 21,948,545 11 1,309,758 1,312,860 82 5,249,570 9,840,949 41 420,321 619,639 59 1,786,937 1,835,960 2 18,490 4,968 13 158,314 57,813 103 4,634,765 8,276,356 Israel 8 256,897 316,251 5 242,616 296,558 3 14,281 19,693 Italy 546 15,332,914 15,734,349 10 549,332 622,861 71 3,124,554 5,724,207 32 263,934 359,669 25 315,222 351,465 160 4,204,110 675,529 69 3,044,079 1,511,993 179 3,831,683 6,488,625 Jamaica 18 136,792 131,289 2 15,710 19,317 2 26,946 44,709 11 51,236 60,012 3 42,900 7,251 Japan 773 20,473,514 28,996,541 6 415,132 406,840 228 9,853,820 18,306,430 34 150,436 197,163 56 2,509,368 1,664,577 128 973,286 355,833 117 2,770,866 1,069,420 204 3,800,606 6,996,278 Jordan 12 97,752 99,113 7 66,138 86,032 4 21,449 5,474 1 10,165 7,607 Kazakhstan 11 71,521 116,209 2 8,364 10,938 1 3,485 3,983 8 59,672 101,288 Kenya 1 1,755 2,639 1 1,755 2,639 Kiribati 63 319,712 441,593 5 50,177 83,622 41 170,730 205,845 1 1,514 1,309 16 97,291 150,817 Kuwait 35 2,902,024 5,171,603 1 75,579 85,437 4 68,303 45,213 4 185,944 215,230 26 2,572,198 4,825,723 Latvia 18 97,312 87,925 15 58,175 78,604 1 35,154 3,680 2 3,983 5,641 Lebanon 25
Recommended publications
  • Container Ship Size and Port Relocation Discussion Paper 169 Roundtable

    Container Ship Size and Port Relocation Discussion Paper 169 Roundtable

    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Container Ship Size and Port Relocation Discussion Paper 169 Roundtable Olaf Merk International Transport Forum CPB Corporate Partnership Board Container Ship Size and Port Relocation Discussion Paper 169 Roundtable Olaf Merk International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.
  • Section 3 2018 Edition

    Section 3 2018 Edition

    S e c ti o n 3 Vessel Requirements 3.1 Definitions, p. 2 3.2 Size and Draft Limitations of Vessels, p. 4 3.3 Requirement for Pilot Platforms and Shelters on Certain Vessels, p. 16 3.4 Navigation Bridge Features Required of Transiting Vessels, p. 19 3.5 Requirements for Non-Self-Propelled Vessels, p. 31 3.6 Vessels Requiring Towing Services, p. 32 3.7 Deckload Cargo, p. 33 3.8 Construction, Number and Location of Chocks and Bitts, p. 34 3.9 Mooring Lines, Anchors and Deck Machinery, p. 41 3.10 Boarding Facilities, p. 41 3.11 Definite Phase-out of Single-Hull Oil Tankers, p. 47 3.12 Admeasurement System for Full Container Vessels, p. 48 3.13 Deck-loaded Containers on Ships not Built for Container Carriage, p. 49 3.14 Unauthorized Modification to the PC/UMS Net Tonnage Certificate, p. 50 3.15 Calculation of PC/UMS Net Tonnage on Passenger Vessels, p. 51 3.16 Dangerous Cargo Requirements, p. 51 3.17 Cargo Regulated Under MARPOL Annex II, p. 58 3.18 Pre-Arrival Cargo Declarations, Security Inspection and Escort, p. 58 3.19 Hot Work Performed On Board Vessels, p. 60 1 OP Operations Manual Section 3 2018 Edition 3.20 Manning Requirements, p. 61 3.21 Additional Pilots Due to Vessel Deficiencies, p. 62 3.22 Pilot Accommodations Aboard Transiting Vessels, p. 63 3.23 Main Source of Electric Power, p. 63 3.24 Emergency Source of Electrical Power, p. 63 3.25 Sanitary Facilities and Sewage Handling, p.
  • Downloaded, Is Consistently the Same and Their Facilities Are Accessible Only to the Types of Goods in Which They Manage (Roa Et Al, 2013)

    Downloaded, Is Consistently the Same and Their Facilities Are Accessible Only to the Types of Goods in Which They Manage (Roa Et Al, 2013)

    Running head: THE IMPACT OF VESSEL BUNCHING 1 The Impact of Vessel Bunching: Managing Roll-on-Roll-off Terminal Operations Jonathan E. Gurr California State University Maritime Academy THE IMPACT OF VESSEL BUNCHING 2 Abstract The operations at port terminals are under consent examination, consistently investigating the various operational challenges effecting efficiency and performance. In a study to identify the consequences of vessel bunching, vessels that arrive within a short amount of time between each vessel, this paper presents an approach to forecast Ro-Ro terminal capacity while referencing the various input factors: vessel arrival schedule, inbound cargo volume, and rail or truck out-gate volume. Using a quantitative analysis derived using actual historical data from a Ro-Ro terminal at the Port of Long Beach, California, the proposed approach applied an additional probability factor that vessel bunching would occur. The analysis highlights the effectiveness of using actual historical data when examining a Ro-Ro terminal’s capacity and how the resulting information could be communicated inclusively with all stakeholders involved in port operations as means of performance improvement. Keywords: vessel bunching, ro-ro, terminal, forecast, capacity, risk assessment THE IMPACT OF VESSEL BUNCHING 3 The Impact of Vessel Bunching Seaports remain the most common way to transfer goods from one form of transportation to another. Global ports are responsible for handling over 80 per cent of global merchandise trade in volume and more than two thirds of its value (UNCTAD, 2017). As key nodes in the supply chain, ports are under continual pressure to implement efficiency improvements and cost saving measures.
  • The Need for Speed

    The Need for Speed

    DEO VOLENTE Deo Volente The Need for Speed BUILDERS Hartman Marine B.V. OWNERS Hartman Seatrade B.V. DEO VOLENTE YARD NUMBER 001 IMO NUMBER 9391658 12 | ShipBuilding Industry | Volume 1 | No. 2 Deo Volente.indd 12 07-06-2007 11:42:59 COMO Hartman Seatrade is a modern shipping company specializing in the carriage of all kind of dry cargoes with special emphasis on voluminous project cargoes and heavy lift transports. With a vast experience in deep Deo Volente sea shipping for more than two centuries the Urk based company recently inaugurated its new ‘mini’ heavy lift vessel – Deo Volente. The new build vessel is a surpass of the previous Deo Volente with an accent on operating terms as speed and heavy lift capabilities. Photo courtesy of Flying Focus ight from the beginning the two Hartman brothers MARIN and Wolfards. Construction of the hull was Rhad a pretty good idea of how their new vessel ordered from CIG group who built her on her Polish should look like and be able to. They designed a novel location, and was transferred to the Netherlands for concept for a small and fast heavy lift vessel which outfitting under management of Hartman Marine BV. would fall just in the 3000 gross tonnage and 3000 kW installed power category. These criteria are of High Service Speed significant effect on the operating costs with regard to The Deo Volente is proof of nowadays need for the required number of crew and manning speed. She is the fastest heavy lift cargo ship in the certification.
  • Structural Design of a Container Ship Approximately 3100 TEU According to the Concept of General Ship Design B-178

    Structural Design of a Container Ship Approximately 3100 TEU According to the Concept of General Ship Design B-178

    Structural design of a container ship approximately 3100 TEU according to the concept of general ship design B-178 Wafaa Souadji Master Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the double degree: “Advanced Master in Naval Architecture” conferred by University of Liege "Master of Sciences in Applied Mechanics, specialization in Hydrodynamics, Energetics and Propulsion” conferred by Ecole Centrale de Nantes developed at West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin in the framework of the “EMSHIP” Erasmus Mundus Master Course in “Integrated Advanced Ship Design” Ref. 159652-1-2009-1-BE-ERA MUNDUS-EMMC Supervisor: Dr. Zbigniew Sekulski, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin Reviewer: Prof. Robert Bronsart, University of Rostock Szczecin, February 2012 Structural design of a container ship approximately 3100 TEU 3 according to the concept of general ship design B-178 ABSTRACT Structural design of a container ship approximately 3100 TEU according to the concept of general ship design B-178 By Wafaa Souadji The initial design stage is crucial for the ship design, including the ship structural design, as the decisions are here taken fundamental to reach design objectives by establishing basic ship characteristics. Consequently, errors which may appear have the largest impact on the final design. Two main aspects related to the design of structures are typically addressed in the initial design: analysis of strength and cost estimation. The design developed in the dissertation is based on the conceptual design of general containership B-178 built in the Stocznia Szczecińska Nowa, providing its main particulars, hull form as well as the general arrangement. The general objective of the thesis is to carry out the hull structural design based on the functional requirements of the containership.
  • Potential for Terrorist Nuclear Attack Using Oil Tankers

    Potential for Terrorist Nuclear Attack Using Oil Tankers

    Order Code RS21997 December 7, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Port and Maritime Security: Potential for Terrorist Nuclear Attack Using Oil Tankers Jonathan Medalia Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary While much attention has been focused on threats to maritime security posed by cargo container ships, terrorists could also attempt to use oil tankers to stage an attack. If they were able to place an atomic bomb in a tanker and detonate it in a U.S. port, they would cause massive destruction and might halt crude oil shipments worldwide for some time. Detecting a bomb in a tanker would be difficult. Congress may consider various options to address this threat. This report will be updated as needed. Introduction The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, heightened interest in port and maritime security.1 Much of this interest has focused on cargo container ships because of concern that terrorists could use containers to transport weapons into the United States, yet only a small fraction of the millions of cargo containers entering the country each year is inspected. Some observers fear that a container-borne atomic bomb detonated in a U.S. port could wreak economic as well as physical havoc. Robert Bonner, the head of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has argued that such an attack would lead to a halt to container traffic worldwide for some time, bringing the world economy to its knees. Stephen Flynn, a retired Coast Guard commander and an expert on maritime security at the Council on Foreign Relations, holds a similar view.2 While container ships accounted for 30.5% of vessel calls to U.S.
  • Det Norske Veritas

    Det Norske Veritas

    DET NORSKE VERITAS Report Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Report No./DNV Reg No.: 2011-0053/ 12RJ7IW-4 Rev 00, 2011-01-18 DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK Table of Contents SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 2 PHASE 1 OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................... 3 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1 General ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Arctic waters delimitation .......................................................................................... 3 3.3 Heavy fuel oil definition and fuel descriptions .......................................................... 4 3.4 Application of AIS data.............................................................................................. 5 3.5 Identifying the vessels within the Arctic.................................................................... 6 3.6 Identifying the vessels using HFO as fuel.................................................................. 7 4 TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF USING HFO
  • Nilotic Livestock Transport in Ancient Egypt

    Nilotic Livestock Transport in Ancient Egypt

    NILOTIC LIVESTOCK TRANSPORT IN ANCIENT EGYPT A Thesis by MEGAN CHRISTINE HAGSETH Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Chair of Committee, Shelley Wachsmann Committee Members, Deborah Carlson Kevin Glowacki Head of Department, Cynthia Werner December 2015 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2015 Megan Christine Hagseth ABSTRACT Cattle in ancient Egypt were a measure of wealth and prestige, and as such figured prominently in tomb art, inscriptions, and even literature. Elite titles and roles such as “Overseer of Cattle” were granted to high ranking officials or nobility during the New Kingdom, and large numbers of cattle were collected as tribute throughout the Pharaonic period. The movement of these animals along the Nile, whether for secular or sacred reasons, required the development of specialized vessels. The cattle ferries of ancient Egypt provide a unique opportunity to understand facets of the Egyptian maritime community. A comparison of cattle barges with other Egyptian ship types from these same periods leads to a better understand how these vessels fit into the larger maritime paradigm, and also serves to test the plausibility of aspects such as vessel size and design, composition of crew, and lading strategies. Examples of cargo vessels similar to the cattle barge have been found and excavated, such as ships from Thonis-Heracleion, Ayn Sukhna, Alexandria, and Mersa/Wadi Gawasis. This type of cross analysis allows for the tentative reconstruction of a vessel type which has not been identified previously in the archaeological record.
  • ONI-54-A.Pdf

    ONI-54-A.Pdf

    r~us U. S. FLEET TRAIN- Division cf Naval Intelligence-Identification and Characteristics Section e AD Destroyer Tenders Page AP Troop Transports Pa g e t Wo "'W" i "~ p. 4-5 z MELVILLE 28 5 BURROWS 14 3, 4 DOBBIN Class 4 7 WHARTON 9 9 BLACK HAWK 28 21, 22 WAKEFIELD Class 12 11, 12 ALTAIR Class 28 23 WEST POINT 13 14, 15, 17-19 DIXIE Class 7 24 ORIZABA 13 16 CASCADE 10 29 U. S. GRANT 14 20,21 HAMUL Class 22 31, 3Z CHATEAU THIERRY Class 9 33 REPUBLIC 14 AS Submarine Tenders 41 STRATFORD 14 3 HOLLAND 5 54, 61 HERMIT AGE Class 13 5 BEAVER 16 63 ROCHAMBEAU 12 11, 12, 15 19 FULTON Class 7 67 DOROTHEA L. DIX 25 Sin a ll p. H 13, 14 GRIFFIN Class 22 69- 71,76 ELIZ . STANTON Cla ss 23 20 OTUS 26 72 SUSAN B. ANTHONY 15 21 AN TEA US 16 75 GEMINI 17 77 THURSTON 20 AR Repair Ships 110- "GENERAL" Class 10 1 MEDUSA 5 W orld W ar I types p. 9 3, 4 PROMETHEUS Class 28 APA Attack Transports 5- VULCAN Class 7 1, 11 DOYEN Class 30 e 9, 12 DELTA Class 22 2, 3, 12, 14- 17 HARRIS Class 9 10 ALCOR 14 4, 5 McCAWLEY , BARNETT 15 11 RIGEL 28 6-9 HEYWOOD Class 15 ARH Hull Repair Ships 10, 23 HARRY LEE Class 14 Maritime types p. 10-11 13 J T. DICKMAN 9 1 JASON 7 18-zo; 29, 30 PRESIDENT Class 10 21, 28, 31, 32 CRESCENT CITY Class 11 .
  • 13 Ship-Breaking.Com

    13 Ship-Breaking.Com

    Information bulletin on September 26th, 2008 ship demolition #13 June 7th to September 21st 2008 Ship-breaking.com February 2003. Lightboat, Le Havre. February 2008 © Robin des Bois From June 7th to September 21st 2008, 118 vessels have left to be demolished. The cumulative total of the demolitions will permit the recycling of more than 940,000 tons of metals. The 2008 flow of discarded vessels has not slowed down. Since the beginning of the year 276 vessels have been sent to be scrapped which represents more than 2 millions tons of metals whereas throughout 2007 289 vessels were scrapped for a total of 1.7 milion tons of metals. The average price offered by Bangladeshi and Indian ship breakers has risen to 750-800 $ per ton. The ship owners are taking advantage of these record prices by sending their old vessels to be demolished. Even the Chinese ship breaking yards have increased their price via the purchase of the container ship Provider at 570$ per ton, with prices averaging more than 500 $. However, these high prices have now decreased with the collapse of metal prices during summer and the shipyards are therefore renegotiating at lower price levels with brokers and cash buyers sometimes changing the final destination at the last minute. This was the case of the Laieta, which was supposed to leave for India for 910 $ per ton and was sold to Bangladesh at 750 $ per ton. The price differences have been particularly notable in India; the shipyards prices have returned to 600 $ per ton. From June to September, India with 60 vessels (51%) to demolish, is ahead of Bangladesh with 40 (34%), The United States 8 (7%), China 4 (4%), Turkey 2 (2%), Belgium and Mexico, 1 vessel each (1%).
  • Appendix: Case Studies of Environmental Dredging Projects Table 1

    Appendix: Case Studies of Environmental Dredging Projects Table 1

    1. Introduction This section describes the sources of available data on which much of the performance standards is based. Completed dredging projects that provide information on upstream and downstream water column conditions, as well as on mass of contaminant removed, provide a basis for determining historical rates of loss and dredging-related recontamination. It was thought that dredging projects that have been completed or are currently in progress can provide practical information on resuspension issues. Information on water quality data, equipment used, monitoring techniques, etc. from these projects will give insight as how to develop the performance standards. For the resuspension standard, water column monitoring results available from other sites were used to complete an analysis of the case study data. The process used to gather relevant information from dredging sites and the information obtained are included herein. It is also important to review all information that exists for the Hudson River. Available data was used to assess the existing variability in the Hudson River water quality, and can be used to estimate the water column quality during and resulting from the dredging operation. Descriptions of the data sets available to perform this analysis are provided herein. 2. Case Studies Objective and Overview During completion of the Hudson River Feasibility Study (FS) and the associated Responsiveness Summary (RS), the GE dredging database, the USEPA website, and other online sources were investigated to identify dredging projects that were relevant and similar to that proposed for the Hudson River in size and complexity. The USEPA and State agencies were contacted to gather information for each dredging project.
  • LNG AS SHIP FUEL No 01 2014

    LNG AS SHIP FUEL No 01 2014

    LNG AS SHIP FUEL No 01 2014 THE FUTURE – TODAY LNG READY SERVICE ENGINES FOR GAS-FUELLED SHIPS RECOMMENDED PRACTICE ON BUNKERING GLOBAL LNG SOLUTIONS DNV GL Anzeige Safe Hands MARITIME PUT THE FUTURE OF YOUR FLEET IN SAFE HANDS As your classification partner, our extensive maritime vessels, benefitting your business and the maritime industry expertise, technical knowledge and regulatory foresight as a whole. With DNV GL your fleet is in safe hands. will help to ensure that your fleet meets the demands Can you afford anything else? of the future. Our aim is safety, compliance and optimal operational performance throughout the lifetime of your Learn more at dnvgl.com/maritime 2 LNG AS SHIP FUEL No. 01 2014 EDITORIAL In 2000 the first LNG-fuelled ferry based on DNV GL standards was launched. This ferry has been operating safely and successfully ever since. Over the years that have followed, shipping has seen bunker prices rise sharply and environmental regula- tions tighten, while in the LNG sector there has been a surge in production and deployment of infrastructure. Combined, these trends have set the stage for LNG to emerge as a viable fuel choice on a much larger scale. In 2014 the industry hit a significant milestone with over 120 LNG-fuelled ships in operation or on order worldwide. They range from passenger ferries, Coast Guard ships, containerships and Con-Ro vessels to Dr Gerd-Michael Wuersig tankers and platform supply vessels. The vast majority Business Director LNG-fuelled ships Senior Principal Specialist of these ships is in operation or will be built to DNV Business Development GL class, reflecting the trust our customers have in [email protected] our long involvement in this technology and our continually evolving technical expertise.