DOCSLIB.ORG

CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT of ORAL EVIDENCE to Be Published As HC 707-Vi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT of ORAL EVIDENCE to Be Published As HC 707-Vi CORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 707-vi HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE POLITICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM COMMITTEE THE IMPACT AND EFFECTIVENESS OF MINISTERIAL RESHUFFLES THURSDAY 31 JANUARY 2013 CHRIS MONCRIEFF and STEVE RICHARDS Evidence heard in Public Questions 317 - 360 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is a corrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. The transcript is an approved formal record of these proceedings. It will be printed in due course. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee on Thursday 31 January 2013 Members present: Mr Graham Allen (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope Sheila Gilmore Fabian Hamilton Mrs Eleanor Laing Mr Andrew Turner Stephen Williams ________________ Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Chris Moncrieff, Press Association, and Steve Richards, The Independent, gave evidence. Q317 Chair: Chris, good morning; and Steve, welcome. As you know, we are conducting an inquiry into reshuffles, and we have been taking evidence from many people. We hope to conclude this in the not-too-distant future. We have one further witness to come, Gus O’Donnell, and then we will start writing up a report. Some very interesting comment has been made about the whole process, and, of course, halfway through our inquiry, the Prime Minister—just to help us along—had a reshuffle, so that we could have a look at one first hand. Chris, are you receiving us loud and clear at the moment? Is your hearing aid difficulty resolved? Are we loud enough for you? Chris Moncrieff: If you could up the decibels a bit, I would grateful. Chair: If colleagues will just bear that in mind. Chris Moncrieff: Thank you. Q318 Chair: Chris or Steve, would you like to say something to start us off, or shall we jump straight into questions? Chris Moncrieff: I am quite happy for you to go straight in. Steve Richards: Yes, similarly. Q319 Fabian Hamilton: Good morning, gentlemen. Peter Riddell told us that he thought there was a danger of exaggerating the influence of the media on reshuffles. How much impact do you think that media speculation has, both on the timing of a reshuffle and on decisions about who should be moved and when? Chris Moncrieff: I think that is exaggerated. I do not think the media have all that much influence over reshuffles. It has led to the resignation of one or two Ministers who had said they were not going to let the press get rid of them, but they eventually have gone. There is too much talk of the power of the press. I do not think that exists in this area. I believe that Prime Ministers take their own decisions and are not influenced by the press. Indeed, there have been junior Ministers who have come to me, fearing they were going to get the sack, and asked me to run stories saying, “This man must go”, because, generally speaking, a Prime 2 Minister would not do what the press invited him to do. I never followed up those invitations, but that did happen. I just do not think the press have much influence at all on reshuffles. They certainly did not in the Thatcher era, and I do not think they have since. The talk about the power of the press and the influence of the press in politics is overstated. Steve Richards: I agree with everything except for the last sentence. I think the power of the press and the media generally is immense on British politics, but not in this area. This is an area where other factors determine whether a Cabinet reshuffle takes place. The media enjoy speculating about reshuffles; they do it without any informed material because this is a Prime Minister’s decision with his close colleagues. I think the media impact is nil, in terms of timing and content. Chris Moncrieff: Nil, really? Steve Richards: In terms of reshuffles, yes. In many other areas, immense, but not in terms of reshuffles. Q320 Fabian Hamilton: Even to the extent that there is often media speculation about who is going to go where. Does even that have no influence whatsoever? Steve Richards: None whatsoever. That kind of speculation fills columns and pages every now and again, but it has none whatsoever. Clearly, a criterion for promoting or getting rid of Ministers might be the way they perform in the media, or the way they are perceived in the media, but that is a completely different issue from whether the media in any way shape the timing or substance of a reshuffle. Chris Moncrieff: Yes, I agree with that. I think you had the Cabinet Secretary, Jeremy Heywood, here the other day, and he said that he did not like all this press speculation because they always got it wrong. I do not know where he got that idea, quite frankly, because I can remember several instances, including with Margaret Thatcher’s very first Cabinet in 1979, when some of us got the entire Cabinet right hours before it was announced. This was no leak on the part of Thatcher herself; she was bitterly opposed to that throughout her premiership. There were no leaks from her or authorised by her. It was just if you knew where to look, where the gossip was and who to ring up, and we had the whole thing set up. Indeed, you could also find out—and Ministers themselves often knew in advance, through guesswork, that they were going to get the sack. Sir Ian Gilmour was one of the first Thatcher Ministers to be dismissed. He was about as far from Thatcher politically as a fellow Tory could be. He told me that he thought he would last about another month as Lord Privy Seal. He gave me a bit of paper and said, “Put this in your pocket and put it out at the appropriate time,” and he was right. He got the sack just a month later, and that piece of paper said, “It does no harm to throw the occasional man overboard, but it does not do much good to us steering full speed ahead for the rocks”. He was not a master of subtlety, but he got it right. Q321 Fabian Hamilton: That is a very good one. I seem to recall, just before the 2001 general election, intense media speculation that David Blunkett would be the next Home Secretary, and that was exactly what happened. Do you think that that was because somebody wanted the media to know, because it was going to happen anyway, or was it pure guesswork on the part of the press? Steve Richards: No. Probably somebody wanted it out there that this was going to happen, and I seem to remember that speculation. It was probably quite well informed but, again, that is politics. That is not about influencing a reshuffle; that is reporting what a Prime Minister plans to do. There are many interesting areas about the impact of reshuffles on policy and politics, but this one is a complete red herring. The media can report speculation about what is happening, but that does not influence the outcome—it is a reflection of what 3 someone is already planning to do. It is one of the few areas where a Prime Minister, however tight a corner he or she is in, tends to exert quite a lot of power. In the old days, in the 1970s, people like Wilson had to weigh up the balance between left and right in his party. Cameron now has the dynamics of the coalition, but a Prime Minister with a strong overall majority can obsess about the media in most areas, as Tony Blair did, but not in this. Q322 Fabian Hamilton: That is very interesting. When he gave evidence to us, Lord Reid suggested that, in an ideal world, the media and everybody else would regard reshuffles as part of the natural evolution of the Government, in much the same way as it would in the private sector with personnel changing. It seems to me that the media do not regard reshuffles in this way. What do you think? Chris Moncrieff: The situation changes with whoever is Prime Minister. The present Prime Minister, admittedly inhibited by leading a coalition Government, has had only one really major shuffle since he came to power. After the Andrew Mitchell affair, he managed to fill the gap by reintroducing Sir George Young into the Government, thus avoiding any kind of domino effect. Tony Blair was a great one for reshuffles. I think one of his favourite Ministers was John Reid, who he used to put in various Departments—forgive me if I may be a trifle inelegant—to give them a kick up the hindquarters. John Reid did not enjoy the reputation for nothing of having a safe pair of fists. They vary a lot, Prime Ministers. Cameron said at the start, and he seems to have stuck with it, that he was not going to move Ministers around much if he could avoid it. Steve Richards: The reporting of reshuffles on the day they happen is often over- excited and exaggerates their significance, but that is not unique to reshuffles. It is a very accessible drama—the sacking of quite well-known, prominent people who rise above us.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Navigating Brexit: Hanover’S Business Advisory
    Navigating Brexit: Hanover’s Business Advisory CHARLES LEWINGTON, MANAGING DIRECTOR Charles is the founder and Managing Director of Hanover. Formerly Press Secretary to Prime –What are the consequences of Brexit and how will it impact your business? Minister John Major, Charles provides strategic counsel to CEOs of UK businesses and the UK –How will you reassure investors, staff and your supply chain? Directors of overseas businesses with substantial British operations –Who should you be engaging with during new negotiations with the EU CHRISTIAN HIERHOLZER, and what should you be saying? MANAGING DIRECTOR, BRUSSELS Christian provides high-level strategic advice –How do you keep abreast of the dramatic daily events in London and Brussels? to clients across a variety of sectors and policy areas . Christian started his 12-year career in EU affairs as policy adviser to Karl-Heinz Florenz, former chair of the European Parliament’s Environment Committee. STEVE RICHARDS, SENIOR ADVISER A distinguished broadcaster and columnist, Steve provides political, media and policy The UK vote to leave the European Union has caused economic analysis for Hanover’s clients. He writes for The Independent, Guardian, Times and uncertainty and political turmoil. Whilst for many it is business as Financial Times and presents BBC Radio 4’s usual until Article 50 is formally enacted, it is very unclear what new The Week in Westminster. LAURA SWIRE, DIRECTOR, ADVOCACY arrangement with the EU will be put in its place. Will it be EEA Plus; Laura leads Hanover’s advocacy team providing EEA Minus or a straight WTO deal? strategic counsel on political and regulatory environments, reputation management and campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year of Living Dangerously (PDF)
    MEDIA The year of living dangerously Politicians can usually rely on the press to back ‘tough on drugs’ stances. But not always. By Malcolm Dean In his evidence to the Leveson inquiry the independent Police Foundation open mind” as did The Evening Standard; into press ethics, former Conservative published what became known as while The Daily Mail, which placed an minister Chris Patten criticised the Runciman report, after its Chair, extract from its editorial in the middle politicians for seeking close relationships Dame Ruth Runciman. It was the of its front page declaring that “despite with newspaper proprietors saying most comprehensive review of drugs this paper’s instinctive reservations they had ‘demeaned themselves’ legislation for a quarter of a century. over a more relaxed approach to drugs, by ‘grovelling’ to the likes of Rupert Ministers expected the tabloids to treat we believe the issue deserves mature Murdoch. Arguably, nowhere is this kow- the report with the vitriol and vilification and rational debate.” Most astonishing towing more obvious than in the arena they traditionally pour over progressive of all was the response of The Telegraph. of drug policy, and explains much of the proposals. For once this did not happen. In an extraordinary editorial, given reason why most politicians refuse even Ministers were handed a copy of the its previously hard line approach, it to engage in the debate about reform, let report at the Home Office on Friday 25 proclaimed: “We are moving reluctantly alone propose changes. March, three days before its publication to the view that Dame Runciman is Policy-making is a complex process.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics: Pre-University Reading
    Year 13 Politics Students – reading, listening and viewing to keep you entertained and informed Please see the last page for details of an exciting competition! Books: Yuval Harari - 21 Lessons for the 21st Century – from the author of the superb history bestseller, “Sapiens”. This book looks at the present and the future. “There is surely no one alive who is better at explaining our world than Yuval Noah Harari - he is the lecturer we all wish we’d had at university. Reading this book, I must have interrupted my partner a hundred times to pass on fascinating things I’d just read.” Adam Kaye Owen Jones – “The Establishment” – “Behind our democracy lurks a powerful but unaccountable network of people who wield massive power and reap huge profits in the process.” Hardly impartial, but an interesting viewpoint. Tim Marshall – “Prisoners of Geography - Ten Maps That Tell You Everything You Need to Know About Global Politics” - "A fresh and original insight into the geopolitics behind today's foreign policy challenges" - Andrew Neil Steve Richards - The Prime Ministers – A landmark history of the men and women who have defined the UK's role in the modern world - and what makes them special - by a seasoned political journalist. Michael Lewis – “The Fifth Risk” – Michael Lewis, author of the Big Short and Moneyball, looks at events in the US after the election of Donald Trump. “Michael Lewis reveals the combustible cocktail of wilful ignorance and venality that is fuelling the destruction of a country's fabric.” Peter Frankopan – “The New Silk Roads” – a look at the interconnected world and the recent eastwards shift in power.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Affairs of Phoenix Venture Holdings Limited, Mg Rover Group Limited and 33 Other Companies Volume I
    REPORT ON THE AFFAIRS OF PHOENIX VENTURE HOLDINGS LIMITED, MG ROVER GROUP LIMITED AND 33 OTHER COMPANIES VOLUME I Gervase MacGregor FCA Guy Newey QC (Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry under section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985) Report on the affairs of Phoenix Venture Holdings Limited, MG Rover Group Limited and 33 other companies by Gervase MacGregor FCA and Guy Newey QC (Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry under section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985) Volume I Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich, NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone 0870 240 3701 TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Customers can also order publications from: TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Tel 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 Published with the permission of the Department for Business Innovation and Skills on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright 2009 All rights reserved. Copyright in the typographical arrangement and design is vested in the Crown. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU. First published 2009 ISBN 9780 115155239 Printed in the United Kingdom by the Stationery Office N6187351 C3 07/09 Contents Chapter Page VOLUME
    [Show full text]
  • New Ministerial Team at the Department of Health
    New Ministerial Team at the Department of Health The Rt Hon Alan Johnson MP Secretary of State for Health Alan Johnson was first elected to Parliament in 1997 as the Member for Kingston upon Hull. A former postman, Alan Johnson served as a former General Secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) and is one of the largest trade union names to have entered Parliament in recent decades. Often credited with the much coveted tag of being an "ordinary bloke", he is highly articulate and effective and is credited with the successful campaign that deterred the previous Conservative government from privatising the Post Office. Popular among his peers, Alan Johnson is generally regarded to be on the centre right of the Labour Party and is well regarded by the Labour leadership. As a union member of Labour's ruling NEC (up to 1996) he was seen as supportive of Tony Blair's attempts to modernise the Labour Party. He was the only senior union leader to back the abolition of Labour's clause IV. He becomes the first former union leader to become a cabinet minister in nearly 40 years when he is appointed to the Work and Pensions brief in 2004. After moving to Trade and Industry, he becomes Education and Skills Secretary in May 2006. After being tipped by many as the front-runner in the Labour deputy leadership contest of 2007, Alan Johnson was narrowly beaten by Harriet Harman. Commons Career PPS to Dawn Primarolo: as Financial Secretary, HM Treasury 1997-99, as Paymaster General, HM Treasury 1999; Department of Trade and Industry 1999-2003:
    [Show full text]
  • Cousins Across the Pond: Crises in Westminster and the Parliamentary Model's Usefulness for Reform of the U.S
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences 4-8-2011 Cousins Across the Pond: Crises in Westminster and the Parliamentary Model's Usefulness for Reform of the U.S. Model Cory J. Krasnoff University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Part of the Comparative Politics Commons Recommended Citation Krasnoff, Cory J., "Cousins Across the Pond: Crises in Westminster and the Parliamentary Model's Usefulness for Reform of the U.S. Model" 08 April 2011. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/137. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/137 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cousins Across the Pond: Crises in Westminster and the Parliamentary Model's Usefulness for Reform of the U.S. Model Keywords UK, England, Britain, Parliament, Westminster, Crisis, Social Sciences, Political Science, John DiIulio, Dilulio, John Disciplines Comparative Politics This article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/137 Cousins Across the Pond: Crises in Westminster and the Parliamentary Model’s Usefulness for Reform of the U.S. Model Cory J. Krasnoff University of Pennsylvania Department of Political Science Robert A. Fox Leadership Program April 8th, 2011 Acknowledgements There are so many without whom this research would not have been possible. First and foremost are those on both sides of the pond whom, through their tireless support on this project and beyond, I have come to consider part of my family: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Email: [email protected] Webpage
    CHARLES CLARKE Email: [email protected] Webpage: www.charlesclarke.org Charles Clarke is Visiting Professor in Economics and Migration at University College London and a Fellow at the Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM). As Home Secretary from 2004-06 he had direct responsibility for Migration, including the February 2005 White Paper “Controlling our Borders: Making Migration Work for Britain” (Cm 6472). He also has a range of activities in the field of international education, including work with Open University, Infinitas Learning, INTO University Partnerships and the Alexandria Trust. He gives papers at various international education events and seeks to promote educational development internationally. Appointments: Since 2011 Charles has been a member of the Transatlantic Council on Migration, which is a project of the Migration Policy Institute: http://www.migrationpolicy.org/transatlantic/ He is a member of the International Advisory Board of the Schengen White List Project, which is run by the European Stability Initiative: http://www.esiweb.org/index.php?lang=en&id=483 Charles Clarke is a Council member of the European Council for Foreign Relations and a member of the Steering Group of the Apeldoorn Conference which stimulates dialogue between the UK and Holland. Other academic appointments include Visiting Professor in Politics at the University of East Anglia and Visiting Professor in Politics and Faith at the University of Lancaster, as well as other occasional academic lectures and events. Publications on immigration: In early 2012 he published an essay, "The EU and Migration: A Call for Action", for the Centre for European Reform. To read the essay, please click here.
    [Show full text]
  • MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY of EDUCATION Department of English Language and Literature
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION Department of English Language and Literature Teenagers and School in the novel The Rotter’s Club by Jonathan Coe Final Work Brno 2021 Final Work Consultant: Mgr. Lucie Podroužková, Ph.D. Author: Mgr. Michaela Šikulová Anotace Tato práce se zabývá rozborem knihy současného britského spisovatele Jonathana Coea a zkoumáním některých myšlenek jako je třeba vliv školního prostřední nebo historických událostí na osudy hlavních hrdinů. Dále se zabývá také tématem dospívání a sleduje mezilidské vztahy mezi hlavními hrdiny románu, a to hlavně téma přátelství a otevřeného nepřátelství. Důležité je v této souvislosti prostředí, do kterého je román zasazen. Británii 70. let 20. století je obdobím kulturních a sociálních změn společnosti, a to má bezesporu vliv na vývoj románových postav. Neméně důležité je i prostředí, ve kterém se hlavní hrdinové nejvíce pohybují, a to je škola a edukační systém, který v té době také prochází řadou změn. Annotation The final Work deals With the novel The Rotter’s Club by a contemporary British Writer Jonathan Coe. The book is analysed, and the main focus is on topics such as maturing and the school environment and its influence on the main characters in terms of forming relationships. There are also some important social and cultural issues in the background of the story that undoubtedly have a certain influence on the development of the story and the main characters. Important historical and social changes are explained more in details. Klíčová slova 70. léta 20. století, Británie, britský vzdělávací systém, přátelství, dospívání, současná britská literatura, školní prostředí, vývojová psychologie Keywords The 1970s, Britain, British educational system, school environment, friendship, adolescents, contemporary British literature, developmental psychology Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci zpracovala samostatně a použila jen citované prameny.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Best of Both Worlds' Or 'A Compromise Policy'? Co
    ‘THE BEST OF BOTH WORLDS’ OR ‘A COMPROMISE POLICY’? CO-LOCATION AS A FORM OF EDUCATIONAL PLACEMENT FOR PUPILS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS. EVE GRIFFITHS BA(Hons.), PGCE, M.Ed. A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Education University of Birmingham September 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Co-location involves the physical placement of two schools onto one site. By some it is seen as a ‘compromise policy’ which prevents inclusion, whilst other authors argue that it offers ‘the best of both worlds’ in allowing pupils with special needs to access both mainstream and special school environments. The teacher-research presented here focused on the co-location of a special school with a mainstream secondary school. It used formal interviews and questionnaires to explore the attitudes of staff and parents towards the co-location and a ‘mosaic’ (Clark and Moss, 2001, p.1) of child-friendly methods to access the opinions of pupils from both schools. The research also included case studies of two co-located special schools which further explored the concept of co-location and considered the relationship of co-location to broader literature relating to the educational placement and inclusion of children with special needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Propaganda and Political Marketing
    Notes Introduction: Propaganda and Political Marketing 2 Stanley Kelley, Professional Public Relations and Political Power (1956) p. 210. 2 Hugo Young and Anne Sloman, The Thatcher Phenomenon (1986) p. 94. 3 Ibid., pp. 94-5. 4 See especially New Statesman's election edition, 10 June 1983. 5 For an account of the programme, see The Listmer, 16 June 1983. 6 Wendy Webster, Not A Man To Matcll Her (1990). 7 Philip Kleinman, The Saatchi & Saatchi Story (1987) p. 32. 8 Campaign, 30 November 1990. 9 Martin Harrop, 'Political Marketing', in ParliamentaryAffairs,July 1990, 43(3). 10 Interview with Peter Mandelson at the Labour Party conference, Black- pool, October 1986. 11 'Party Presence', in Marxism Today, October 1989. 12 Harrop, op. cit. 13 The £11 million figure is quoted in Eric Clark, The Want Makers (1988) p. 312. For a full account of the GLC campaign and its success in shifting public opinion, see Robert Waller, Moulding Political Opinion (1988). 14 Obse1ver, 24 December 1989. 15 Richard Rose, Influencing Voters (1967) p. 13. 16 See Michael Cockerell, Live from Number 10, pp. 280-1. 17 Quoted in HJ. Hanham, Ekctions and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone ( 1978) p. 202. 18 Serge Chakotin, The Rape of the Masses: The Psychology of Totalitarian Propaganda (1939) pp. 131-3. 19 Ibid., p. 171. 20 Ibid. 21 See Max Atkinson, Our Masters' Voices (1988) pp. 13-14. 22 Quoted in Michael Thomas, The Economist Guide to Marketing (1986). 23 Michael J. Baker, 'One More Time- What is Marketing?', in Michael J.
    [Show full text]
  • LOSE-UP Bernard Ingham
    LOSE-UP Bernard Ingham I always think of Bernard above his merits, after fumb- Ingham as 'the ruffian on the ling he was first demoted stair'. Partly because it fits then ruthlessly cut down and his heavy manner and a treated below those merits. facial expression modulat- Moore went in 18 months ing from scowl to snarl by from golden hero to dogfood. way of a derisive grin. But Yet the prime minister's also because WE Henley, Renaissance treachery, her when he created the phrase, capriciousness and essential was describing Death. falseness have never extended Bernard Ingham has been to her private office. Ber- Death to a number of Conser- nard Ingham could quote vative politicians. Patrick Lear to Cordelia: 'We'll wear Jenkin, his position weakened out...packs and sets of great by the Lords' rejection of ones that ebb and flow by the Mrs Thatcher's decision to moon'. Why such trust amid abolish the GLC, learned that capriciousness, such mons- he was at one with the angels trous durability? What are when Ingham told the press the affinities which hold this that it was all up with Jenkin. pair in a magnetic field? After John Biffen had com- Bernard Ingham is a pro- mitted the capital offence of duct of the Left and of the dissent it was Ingham, telling north of England (Hebden the lobby that he had become Bridge in Yorkshire's West 'semi-detached from the gov- Riding). As is well known, he ernment', who held out a has been a Labour council- signed death warrant.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip May, Husband of Prime Minister May: Yet Another Example of the ‘Cosy Relationship’ Between Government and the Arms Industry
    Philip May, Husband of Prime Minister May: Yet Another Example of the ‘Cosy Relationship’ Between Government and the Arms Industry By Political Concern Region: Europe Global Research, April 23, 2018 Theme: Intelligence Political Concern 22 April 2018 A Liverpool reader draws attention to the news that Philip May, husband of the UK prime minister, works for Capital Group, the largest shareholder in arms manufacturer, BAE Systems, whose share price has soared since the recent airstrikes in Syria. It is alsothe second-largest shareholder in Lockheed Martin – a US military arms firm that supplies weapons systems, aircraft and logistical support. Its shares have also rocketed since the missile strikes last week. Selected evidence of the revolving doors between Whitehall appointments, their family and friends and the ‘defence’ industry in our archives, in chronological order: Admiral Sir John Slater, the former first sea lord, left the military in 1998 and became a director and senior adviser to Lockheed Martin UK. Michael Portillo, the secretary of state for defence from 1995 to 1997, became non- executive director of BAE Systems in 2002 before stepping down in 2006. Lord Reid, secretary of state for defence from 2005 to 2006, said in 2008 that he had become group consultant to G4S, the security company that worked closely with the Ministry of Defence in Iraq. Air Chief Marshal Sir Glenn Torpy, the chief of staff from 2006-2009, retired from the RAF last year and will become senior military adviser to BAE Systems in January. Sir Kevin Tebbit, under-secretary at the MoD, became chairman of Finmeccanica UK, owner of Westland helicopters in 2007 and has a variety of other defence related appointments.
    [Show full text]