DOCSLIB.ORG

GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport Comparison of Additional Natural Gas Imports to Europe by Nord Stream 2 Pipeline and LNG Import Alternatives Final Report Title: GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport Comparison of Additional Natural Gas Imports to Europe by Nord Stream 2 Pipeline and LNG Import Alternatives Client: Nord Stream 2 AG Report version: v1.0 Report date: 24/03/2017 © thinkstep AG On behalf of thinkstep AG and its subsidiaries Document prepared by Manfred Russ Title Senior Consultant - Energy and Oil & Gas Signature Quality assurance by Alexander Stoffregen Title Senior Consultant - Energy and Oil & Gas Signature Under the supervision of Dr. Oliver Schuller Title Principal Consultant / Team Lead - Energy and Oil & Gas This report has been prepared by thinkstep with all reasonable skill and diligence within the terms and conditions of the contract between thinkstep and the client. thinkstep is not accountable to the client, or any others, with respect to any matters outside the scope agreed upon for this project. Regardless of report confidentiality, thinkstep does not accept responsibility of whatsoever nature to any third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at its own risk. Interpretations, analyses, or statements of any kind made by a third party and based on this report are beyond thinkstep’s responsibility. If you have any suggestions, complaints, or any other feedback, please contact us at [email protected]. GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport 2 of 113 Table of contents Table of contents _______________________________________________________________ 3 List of figures __________________________________________________________________ 6 List of tables ___________________________________________________________________ 8 List of acronyms _______________________________________________________________10 LCA glossary _________________________________________________________________13 Executive summary ____________________________________________________________14 1. Introduction _____________________________________________________________18 1.1. Natural gas and liquefied natural gas (LNG) ________________________________18 1.2. Introduction to the study ________________________________________________21 2. Goal of the study _________________________________________________________24 3. Scope of the study ________________________________________________________25 3.1. Product systems _______________________________________________________25 3.2. Product function and functional unit ______________________________________26 3.3. System boundaries _____________________________________________________27 3.3.1. Time coverage _______________________________________________________32 3.3.2. Technology coverage__________________________________________________32 3.3.3. Geographical coverage ________________________________________________33 3.4. Allocation _____________________________________________________________33 3.5. Cut-off criteria _________________________________________________________33 3.6. Selection of global warming potential (GWP) as impact category ______________33 3.7. Interpretation to be used ________________________________________________35 3.8. Data quality requirements _______________________________________________35 3.9. Type and format of the report ____________________________________________35 3.10. Software and database __________________________________________________36 3.11. Critical review _________________________________________________________36 4. Life cycle inventory analysis _______________________________________________37 4.1. Number format ________________________________________________________37 4.2. Product characteristics _________________________________________________37 4.3. Data collection procedure _______________________________________________37 4.4. Product system A – supply of natural gas via NSP2 to EU ____________________39 4.4.1. Overview on product system A __________________________________________39 4.4.2. Production and processing _____________________________________________41 4.4.3. Pipeline transport _____________________________________________________43 4.5. Product system B – supply of natural gas via LNG imports to EU ______________47 GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport 3 of 113 4.5.1. Overview on product system B __________________________________________47 4.5.2. Production and processing _____________________________________________51 4.5.3. Pipeline transport _____________________________________________________58 4.5.4. Purification (part of liquefaction) _________________________________________59 4.5.5. Liquefaction _________________________________________________________60 4.5.6. LNG transport _______________________________________________________65 4.5.7. Regasification _______________________________________________________71 4.6. Background data _______________________________________________________72 4.6.1. Fuels and electricity ___________________________________________________72 4.6.2. Raw materials and processes ___________________________________________72 4.6.3. Transportation _______________________________________________________74 4.7. Life cycle inventory analysis results ______________________________________74 5. Life cycle impact assessment results ________________________________________76 5.1. Overall GHG results ____________________________________________________76 5.2. Comparison of results with literature data __________________________________80 5.2.1. Considered studies ___________________________________________________80 5.2.2. Comparison for natural gas import via pipeline ______________________________80 5.2.3. Comparison for natural gas import via LNG routes ___________________________82 5.3. Sensitivity analysis _____________________________________________________85 5.4. Scenario analysis ______________________________________________________92 5.5. Uncertainty analysis ____________________________________________________96 6. Interpretation ____________________________________________________________98 6.1. Identification of relevant findings _________________________________________98 6.2. Assumptions and limitations ____________________________________________100 6.3. Results of comparison with literature data as well as sensitivity, scenario, and uncertainty analysis ___________________________________________________101 6.3.1. Comparison of GHG results with Literature data ____________________________101 6.3.2. Sensitivity analysis ___________________________________________________101 6.3.3. Scenario analysis ____________________________________________________101 6.3.4. Uncertainty analysis __________________________________________________102 6.4. Data quality assessment _______________________________________________102 6.4.1. Precision and completeness ___________________________________________102 6.4.2. Consistency and reproducibility _________________________________________103 6.4.3. Representativeness __________________________________________________103 6.5. Model completeness and consistency ____________________________________103 6.5.1. Completeness ______________________________________________________103 6.5.2. Consistency ________________________________________________________103 6.6. Conclusions, limitations, and recommendations ___________________________104 6.6.1. Conclusions ________________________________________________________104 6.6.2. Limitations _________________________________________________________105 6.6.3. Recommendations ___________________________________________________105 References __________________________________________________________________106 Annex A: Additional result analysis ____________________________________________108 GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport 4 of 113 Annex B: Additional scenario analysis _________________________________________110 Annex C: Critical review report ________________________________________________113 GHG Intensity of Natural Gas Transport 5 of 113 List of figures Figure 1-1: Terminology and constituents of natural (IGU, 2012) ..............................................19 Figure 1-2: Expected future development of natural gas trade (IEA, 2016) ..............................20 Figure 1-3: Current LNG capacity including plants under construction (GIIGNL, 2004- 2016) ........................................................................................................................20 Figure 1-4: Primary energy production in Europe (past, present and forecast) and projected incremental net energy imports into Europe (European Commission, 2016) ........................................................................................................................22 Figure 1-5: Value chain of natural gas with technical focus area of the study highlighted in blue (IGU, 2012) ......................................................................................................23 Figure 3-1: System boundary – entry points of imports to Europe, LNG vs. NSP2 (King&Spalding, 2015) (Nord Stream 2, 2016) ........................................................28 Figure 3-2: System boundaries – considered natural gas import pathways to Europe (thinkstep, 2017a) ....................................................................................................29 Figure 3-3: System boundary – supply chain of natural gas (LNG route), included
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF-Download
    Julian Grinschgl FOKUS | 3/2019 Pipeline Politics, A Single Market, and the Rise of Renewable Energy: Challenges and Pathways for European Energy Security Introduction (CEE) are highly dependent on Russian The Pipeline Legacy gas supplies. Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, At the end of 2018, Gazprom reported Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, Austria, Poland, The collapse of the Soviet Union meant a record high in natural gas exports to Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Finland that the immense network of pipelines Europe, exceeding 200 billion cubic meters import more than 75% of their gas from linking the Siberian gas fields and Europe (bcm) for the first time.1 As of early January Russia.8 Furthermore, gas was used for as are now crossing numerous countries wit- 2019, the United States (US) ambassa- much as a quarter of total primary energy hout an overarching regulator. This creates dor to Germany threatened to sanction consumption in the EU and by looking at tensions between destination, transit, German companies that will continue broader and more long-term scenarios of and supplier countries due to problems to be engaged in the controversial Nord future energy demands it is expected that of governance because these pipelines Stream 2 (NS2) project, aiming to build the share of natural gas in the EU’s energy can be abused as a political tool. Ukra- another direct pipeline from Russia to mix might even further increase.9 The dec- ine, which has been the transit land for Germany circumventing transit states.2 line of domestic gas production in
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen at the Gates: Towards a New Chapter in the EU-Russia Energy Relations
    Hydrogen at the Gates: Towards a New Chapter in the EU-Russia Energy Relations by Aliaksei Patonia Having ratified the Paris Agreement, the European Union (EU) pledged to substantially lower the level of its carbon emissions and become climate-neutral by 2050. In this respect, hydrogen (H2) – an energy source that could prospectively substitute conventional hydrocarbons – is viewed as an important element in achieving these ambitious targets, as it could revolutionize the energy industry. Here, though the EU puts specific attention to the build-up of H2 generation based on renewables, the cheapest way of its current large-scale production is using natural gas as a feedstock – the fuel imported primarily from Russia. This tradeoff between costs and climate commitments makes the future of the EU-Russia energy relations particularly tricky. EU’s Hydrogen Strategy vs. Russia’s ‘Hydrogen Roadmap’ Since energy production and consumption are the largest sources of CO2 emissions in the EU- 271, meeting the climate targets will necessitate a comprehensive transformation of the energy sector. Nevertheless, the energy industries in most European countries are still extensively reliant on hydrocarbons, in general (Figure 1), and natural gas, in particular, most of which is supplied by Russia. That is why, shifting the European economic paradigm towards sustainability is likely to necessitate the review of the EU-Russia energy relations, since Russia’s little focus on climate policy. 1 EEA (2013) 1 Figure 1: EU energy imports from Russia and energy mix2 Though, within the EU, reaching climate neutrality – i.e. the economy with net-zero greenhouse gas emissions – is generally viewed through decarbonization (the substitution of fossil fuels by renewables)3, the intermittency of wind and solar power necessitates finding a way to store large volumes of energy for a long time so that they could be integrated into the energy system4.
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18
    October 2018 LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 OIES PAPER: NG137 Brian Songhurst Research Associate, OIES The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2018 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN: 978-1-78467-120-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671204 i LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Acknowledgements My thanks to fellow OIES colleague Claudio-Steuer for his contributions during the drafting of this paper. My thanks also to the following industry colleagues for their review and comments on the draft: Toby Chancellor-Weale, Chair, IChemE Oil and Natural Gas Special Interest Group (SONG) Chris Spilsbury, LNG Specialists Ltd John Rushbrook, Consultant ii LNG Plant Cost Reduction 2014–18 – October 2018 Preface In his recent papers for OIES on the future of gas in Europe and the global energy economy, Jonathan Stern identified affordability as a key factor in determining whether gas would play a major role in Non-OECD countries. As the majority of traded gas will be LNG, the key question is therefore whether the cost of developing new liquefaction projects can be low enough to allow the gas to be competitive when it reaches the end consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • FSU/CEE Insight: Russia Special
    Analytics. Studies. Modelling.The Oil and Gas Market’s Independent Research Centre. FSU/CEE Insight: Russia Special Issue 17 | 2-May-19 Weekly Report Editorial Nightmare Supply Scenario for FSU/CEE Refiners A full halt on Druzhba flows has refiners along the line scrambling to find alternative crude supplies Outage to affect Poland and Germany much less than Belarus A prolonged Druzhba outage would put an estimated 600,000 b/d of refining capacity at risk s we write this, flows along crude imported via the Druzhba have also been affected. However, it one of the oldest, longest, and pipeline always remained the also means that flows to Russia’s A most important pieces of oil baseload crude in these refineries. biggest export terminal, the Baltic pipeline infrastructure in the world Hence the current outage is an port of Primorsk, have not been are severely disrupted. We are of extremely significant event, contaminated. course referring to Russia’s Druzhba particularly as it may take months (Friendship) pipeline, which remains rather than weeks for the pipeline to A note on the contamination. We the lifeline to several Eastern return to normal operations. understand that the strategy being European and FSU refineries. The employed by the Russians is to northern leg of the pipe supplies Flows stopped after it became blend the crude down to levels Belarus, Poland, and eastern evident that the crude flowing along where the organic chlorides are no Germany, while the southern leg the pipeline was contaminated by longer high enough to cause serves refineries in Hungary, organic chloride in concentrations of problems.
    [Show full text]
  • TOTAL S.A. Yearended December3l, 2015
    KPMG Audit ERNST & YOUNG Audit This isa free translation info English of the statutory auditors' report on the consolidated (mandai statements issued in French and it is provided solely for the convenience 0f English-speaking users. The statutory auditors' report includes information specifically requ?red by French law in such reports, whether modified or flot. This information is presented below the audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements and includes an explanatory para graph discussing the auditors' assessments of certain significant accounting and auditing matters. These assessments were considered for the purpose 0f issuing an audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole and not f0 provide separate assurance on individual account balances, transactions or disclosures. This report also includes information relating to the specific verification of information given in the groups management report. This report should be read in conjunction with and construed in accordance with French law and pro fessional auditing standards applicable in France. TOTAL S.A. Yearended December3l, 2015 Statutory auditors' report on the consolidated financial statements KPMG Audit ERNST & YOUNG Audit Tour EQHO 1/2, place des Saisons 2, avenue Gambetta 92400 Courbevoie - Paris-La Défense 1 CS 60055 S.A.S. à capital variable 92066 Paris-La Défense Cedex Commissaire aux Comptes Commissaire aux Comptes Membre de la compagnie Membre de la compagnie régionale de Versailles régionale de Versailles TOTAL S.A. Year ended December 31, 2015 Statutory auditors' report on the consolidated financial statements To the Shareholders, In compliance with the assignment entrusted to us by your general annual meeting, we hereby report to you, for the year ended December 31, 2015, on: the audit of the accampanying consolidated financial statements of TOTAL S.A.; the justification of our assessments; the specific verification required by law.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Registration Document Including Annual Financial Report Contents
    2014 REGISTRATION DOCUMENT INCLUDING ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CONTENTS Chairman’s Message 2 Key Į gures and highlights 4 ApplicaƟ ons & services 6 1 Persons responsible for the registraƟ on 18 Major shareholders 203 document 13 19 Related-party transacƟ ons 209 2 Statutory Auditors 15 20 Financial informaƟ on concerning 3 Selected Į nancial informaƟ on the Company’s assets and liabiliƟ es, for the Į nancial year ended Į nancial posiƟ on and results 217 on 31 December 2014 17 21 AddiƟ onal informaƟ on 249 4 Risk factors 21 22 Material contracts 259 5 InformaƟ on about the Group 39 23 Third party informaƟ on and 6 Overview of the acƟ viƟ es of the Group 45 statements by experts and declaraƟ ons of any interest 261 7 OrganisaƟ on chart 113 24 Publicly available documents 263 8 Property, plant and equipment 115 25 InformaƟ on on holdings 265 9 Review of Į nancial posiƟ on and results 117 APPENDIX 1 Concordance tables 267 10 Equity and cash 131 APPENDIX 2 11 Research and development, patents Social, environmental and societal and licences 137 data from the board of directors’ management report sƟ pulated in ArƟ cle R. 225-105-1 of the French InformaƟ on on trends and targets 145 12 Commercial Code 271 13 Income forecasts 149 APPENDIX 3 InformaƟ on for the Shareholders’ 14 AdministraƟ ve, management and MeeƟ ng sƟ pulated in ArƟ cle R. 225-83 supervisory bodies and general of the French Commercial Code 293 management 153 APPENDIX 4 Corporate Į nancial statements 15 CompensaƟ on and beneĮ ts 163 prepared in accordance with French GAAP 311 16 Board and management pracƟ ces 173 APPENDIX 5 17 Employees 193 Statutory Auditors’ report on the Į nancial statements prepared in accordance with French standards 331 PROFILE For over 50 years, GTT has been developing technological experƟ se in the liqueĮ ed natural gas industry (LNG).
    [Show full text]
  • THE BELARUS CONNECTION: EXPORTING RUSSIAN GAS to GERMANY and POLAND David Victor and Nadejda Makarova Victor
    geopolitics of gas working paper series THE BELARUS CONNECTION: EXPORTING RUSSIAN GAS TO GERMANY AND POLAND david victor and nadejda makarova victor The Belarus Connection: Exporting Russian Gas to Germany and Poland David G. Victor and Nadejda Makarova Victor Working Paper #26 May 2004 Prepared for the Geopolitics of Natural Gas Study, a joint project of the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development at Stanford University and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University About the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development The Program on Energy and Sustainable Development at Stanford University is an interdisciplinary research program focused on the economic and environmental consequences of global energy consumption. Its studies examine the development of global natural gas markets, reform of electric power markets, and how the availability of modern energy services, such as electricity, can affect the process of economic growth in the world’s poorest regions. The Program also works on legal and regulatory issues surrounding the development of an effective international regime to address the issues of global climate change. The Program, established in September 2001, includes a global network of scholars—based at centers of excellence on six continents—in law, political science, economics and engineering. The Program is part of the Center for Environmental Science and Policy at the Stanford Institute for International Studies. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development At the Center for Environmental Science and Policy Stanford Institute for International Studies Encina Hall East, Room 415 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 http://pesd.stanford.edu [email protected] About the Energy Forum at the James A.
    [Show full text]
  • Yamal LNG Project Completed and Put Into Operation Special Report
    34 Special Report Yamal LNG Project Completed and Put into Operation Yamal LNG Project is China' s first overseas megaproject since the launch of the Belt and Road Imitative. It is also the country' s largest investment project in Russia, widely hailed as a fine example of China-Russia cooperation. CNPC participates in the operation of the project throughout the entire industrial chain and has become a vital player in the international LNG industry. Located in the Arctic Circle of the Yamal Peninsula in Russia, the Yamal project is an integrated project encompassing oil and gas exploration and development, natural gas processing, liquefaction, marketing and shipping. CNPC, China' s Silk Road Fund, Novatek and Total hold 20%, 9.9%, 50.1% and 20% of the equity shares of the project, respectively. "This project is of great significance, for it can help strengthen our economic cooperation with countries in the Asia Pacific region, particularly Reserves the People' s Republic of China, one of our most important partners in the region. Meanwhile, it is a model for successful international cooperation 60 million tons of condensate, 1.3 with France, Italy, Germany and other European trillion cubic meters of countries. " natural gas ——Vladimir Putin, President of Russia Annual capacity Funds raised 25 billion cubic meters of USD 19 billion, 63% natural gas, 1 million tons of which contributed of condensate by China 35 Mutual Benefit and Win-win Results Thanks to concerted efforts of various parties, the first LNG Train of Yamal Project became Four drilling rigs operational in December 2017. This will not only drive the development of Russia’ s energy sector and its border areas, but will also diversify China’ s clean energy supply.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years of Pipes for Gas
    From: Mittel- und Osteuropa Jahrbuch 2020, published on 17 June 2020 by German Eastern Business Association. English working translation. Version in German: https://www.oaoev.de/de/50-jahre-roehren-gegen-erdgas 50 years of pipes for gas: German-Russian century deal and German-American economic crime novel „Germany as far as I'm concerned is captive to Russia because it's getting so much of its energy from Russia. I think that is very inappropriate.“ US President Donald Trump „Germany as far as I'm concerned is captive to Russia because it obtains so much of its energy from Russia. I think that is very inappropriate.“ With these words US President Donald Trump repeatedly expressed his repeated disapproval of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project at the NATO summit in Brussels on 23 July 2018. Almost one and a half years later, on 21 December 2019, he signed a sanctions law against international pipe-laying ships involved in the pipeline construction. The completion of the 2,500-kilometer-long two-strings pipe, which runs through the Baltic Sea starting near St. Petersburg and ending in Lubmin near Greifswald, was thus halted - around 20 days before the last welded seam was applied. In addition to Russia's Gazprom, the Nord Stream 2 project was financed by energy companies from France, Austria, the Netherlands, Great Britain and, of course, Germany. The owners of the special pipe-laying vessels threatened by US sanctions came from Switzerland and Italy. US sanctions against European allies? "Typical Trump" one could say, and sanctions measures could be traced back to his motto "America First".
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Sea Route Beckons LNG Shippers
    Northern Sea Route beckons LNG shippers Global warming may be a threat to glaciers, is revolutionary, a better word would probably be oceanfront cities and fire‐prone forests. evolutionary. Sections of it have been used for centuries. In the early 1500s, Russia's Dmitry But it's also creating new economic opportunities for Gerasimov suggested using the North‐Eastern countries with natural resources in the far north, Passageway (as it was then known) for marine traffic opportunities that some companies and governments between Russia and China. are pushing to exploit. By the mid‐1600s, Russian traders had reached all Opportunities such as the Northern Sea Route, which parts of the route, demonstrating it was theoretically could mean a shorter, faster way to move cargoes — possible for a single vessel to sail the entire route in including liquefied natural gas — to Asia from Russia one voyage. But no one had ever done it. and Norway, and to haul manufactured goods from Asia to Europe. SWEDE SHOWS THE RUSSIANS The Northern Sea Route runs along Russia's northern coast about 3,600 miles between Murmansk in the That honor fell to a Swede named Adolf Nordenskiold. west and the Bering Strait in the east, taking On June 22, 1878, he left Karlsdrona, Sweden, in a 60‐ advantage of the belt of relatively open water formed horsepower wooden sailer‐steamer called the Vega there each summer as the Arctic ice pack retreats. and headed east at a speed of 6 to 7 knots. By late September, he was less than 140 miles from the "What's really driving the Northern Sea Route is global Bering Strait when ice blocked his path and he was commodity prices and natural resource development, obliged to spend the winter near a Chukchi village particularly in Russia," said Lawson Brigham, professor called Pitlekay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western European Gas Market
    THE WESTERN EUROPEAN GAS MARKET Future Gas Infrastructure in Western Europe BERTRAND ROSSERT s.tUf/-9 EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK THE WESTERN EUROPEAN GAS MARKET Future Gas Infrastructure in Western Europe by: BERTRAND ROSSERT EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK The Western European Gas Market Future Gas Infrastructure in Western Europe Sunimary The purpose of this paper is to assess the needs for long distance gas transport infrastructure investment in western Europe (i.e. the European Union, Nonway and Switzeriand). The analysis of eastern European markets is limited to their impact on western European gas markets. The main conclusions are: The increase in gas demand during the next 10 to 15 years will be met entirely from imports Gas demand will continue to grow relatively fast. Western European gas demand could expand from 330 bcm currently to about 390 bcm in 2000 and 410-450 bcm in 2010. Demand from the power sector will grow faster than demand in other sectors, although its growth rate will decrease over time. The residential sector will also contribute signficantiy to overall gas demand growth. The growing demand will require more gas imports, given the expected stagnation (or decline) of domestic gas production in Europe around the present level of 200 bcm per year. As a result, western Europe's outside dependence will increase from about 30% at present to about 40% in 2005. Algeria, Russia and Norway can cover the gap between western European demand and production, up to and beyond 2010. Alternative sources are not necessary although Europe might call upon long distance suppliers to diversify supply sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asian Quest for LNG in a Globalising Market
    Secure Sustainable Together PARTNER COUNTRY SERIES The Asian Quest for LNG in a Globalising Market Secure Sustainable Together PARTNER COUNTRY SERIES The Asian Quest for LNG in a Globalising Market Anne-Sophie CORBEAU, Anne BRAAKSMA, Farid HUSSIN, Yayoi YAGOTO and Takuro YAMAMOTO INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 29 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: n Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. n Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. n Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. n Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies. n Find solutions to global energy challenges through engagement and dialogue with non-member countries, industry, international organisations and other stakeholders.
    [Show full text]