DOCSLIB.ORG

Fixation Disparity and Binocular Mismatching: Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fixation Disparity and Binocular Mismatching: Documents Fixation Disparity and Binocular Mismatching: documents Henk Koppelaar1 , Parastou Kordestani-Moghadam2 1 Fac. of Electric and Electronic Eng., Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, 2628 XE Delft, The Netherlands 2 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Korramabad 6813833946, Iran [1, 2, 11–13, 3–10] References collected before by Henk & Parastou 1. Harwerth RS, Smith EL. MOTOR AND SENSORY FUSION IN MONKEYS: PSYCHOPHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS. 1996. 2. Jaschinski W. Fixation disparity at different viewing distances and the preferred viewing distance in a laboratory near-vision task. 1998. 3. Fredenburg P, Harwerth RS. The relative sensitivities of sensory and motor fusion to small binocular disparities. 2001. 4. Schowengerdt BT, Seibel EJ. True Three-Dimensional Displays that Allow Viewers to Dynamically Shift Accommodation, Bringing Objects Displayed at Different Viewing Distances Into and Out of Focus. CyberPsychology Behav. 2004. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.610. 5. Vernet M, Kapoula Z. Binocular motor coordination during saccades and fixations while reading: A magnitude and time analysis. J Vis. 2009;9:1–13. 6. Kirkby JA, Blythe HI, Drieghe D, Liversedge SP. Reading Text Increases Binocular Disparity in Dyslexic Children. PLoS One. 2011;6:27105. 7. Jainta S, Kapoula Z. Dyslexic children are confronted with unstable binocular fixation while reading. PLoS One. 2011;6:1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018694. 8. Blythe HI, Holliman NS, Jainta S, Tbaily LW, Liversedge SP. Binocular coordination in response to two-dimensional, three-dimensional and stereoscopic visual stimuli. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00926.x. 9. Otero-Millan J, Macknik SL, Martinez-Conde S. Fixational eye movements and binocular vision. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014;8. 10. Alhassan M, Hovis JK, Chou BR. Comparison of MKH-Haase Associated Phoria Charts with Other Common Clinical Tests. Optom Vis Perform. 2016;4:254–64. www.acbo.org.au, www.oepf.org, and www.ovpjournal.org. 11. Jaschinski W. Individual objective and subjective fixation disparity in near vision. PLoS One. 2017. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170190. 12. Gibaldi A, Banks MS. Binocular Eye Movements Are Adapted to the Natural Environment. J Neurosci. 2019;39. 13. Hooge ITC, Hessels RS, Nyström M. Do pupil-based binocular video eye trackers reliably measure vergence? Vision Res. 2019;156. “Fixation Disparity” refs alerted by Elsevier’s Mendeley Database 1. Held RT, Cooper EA, Banks MS. Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth. Curr Biol. 2012.2. 2. Liversedge SP, White SJ, Findlay JM, Rayner K. Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading. Vision Res. 2006.3. 3. Backus BT, Fleet DJ, Parker AJ, Heeger DJ. Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. J Neurophysiol. 2001.4. 4. Cumming BG. An unexpected specialization for horizontal disparity in primate primary visual cortex. Nature. 2002.5. 5. Genovesio A, Ferraina S. Integration of retinal disparity and fixation-distance related signals toward an egocentric coding of distance in the posterior parietal cortex of primates. J Neurophysiol. 2004.6. 6. Zaroff CM, Knutelska M, Frumkes TE. Variation in stereoacuity: Normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003.7. 7. Engbert R, Kliegl R. Microsaccades keep the eyes’ balance during fixation. Psychol Sci. 2004.8. 8. Pouget A, Sejnowski TJ. A neural model of the cortical representation of egocentric distance. Cereb Cortex. 1994.9. 9. Jansen L, Onat S, König P. Influence of disparity on fixation and saccades in free viewing of natural scenes. J Vis. 2009.10. 10. Kirkby JA, Blythe HI, Drieghe D, Liversedge SP. Reading text increases binocular disparity in dyslexic children. PLoS One. 2011.11. 11. Roy JP, Komatsu H, Wurtz RH. Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST. J Neurosci. 1992.12. 12. Liu Y, Bovik AC, Cormack LK. Disparity statistics in natural scenes. J Vis. 2008.13. 13. Bhattacharyya R, Musallam S, Andersen RA. Parietal reach region encodes reach depth using retinal disparity and vergence angle signals. J Neurophysiol. 2009.14. 14. Langer MS, Siciliano RA. Are blur and disparity complementary cues to depth? Vision Res. 2015.15. 15. Dowley D. Fixation disparity. Optom Vis Sci. 1989.16. 16. Jaschinski W, Bröde P, Griefahn B. Fixation disparity and nonius bias. Vision Res. 2000.17. 17. Krug K, Parker AJ. Neurons in dorsal visual area V5/MT signal relative disparity. J Neurosci. 2011.18. 18. Cottereau BR, McKee SP, Ales JM, Norcia AM. Disparity-tuned population responses from human visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2011.19. 19. Minini L, Parker AJ, Bridge H. Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream. J Neurophysiol. 2010.20. 20. Mahaffey C, Michaels AF, Capone DG. The conundrum of marine N2 fixation. American Journal of Science. 2005.21. 21. Patel SS, Jiang BC, Ogmen H. Vergence dynamics predict fixation disparity. Neural Comput. 2001.22. 22. Kommerell G, Gerling J, Ball M, De Paz H, Bach M. Heterophoria and fixation disparity: A review. In: Strabismus. 2000.23. 23. Jainta S, Hoormann J, Kloke WB, Jaschinski W. Binocularity during reading fixations: Properties of the minimum fixation disparity. Vision Res. 2010.24. 24. Juhasz BJ, Liversedge SP, White SJ, Rayner K. Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: Word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity. Q J Exp Psychol. 2006.25. 25. Schor CM. The relationship between fusional vergence eye movements and fixation disparity. Vision Res. 1979. 26. London R, Crelier RS. Fixation disparity analysis: Sensory and motor approaches. Optometry. 2006.2. 27. Karania R, Evans BJW. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: Influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006.3. 28. Hornof AJ, Halverson T. Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations. Behav Res Methods, Instruments, Comput. 2002.4. 29. Jaschinski W. Fixation disparity and accommodation for stimuli closer and more distant than oculomotor tonic positions. Vision Res. 2001.5. 30. Verhoef BE, Bohon KS, Conway BR. Functional architecture for disparity in macaque inferior temporal cortex and its relationship to the architecture for faces, color, scenes, and visual field. J Neurosci. 2015.6. 31. Jainta S, Kapoula Z. Dyslexic children are confronted with unstable binocular fixation while reading. PLoS One. 2011.8. 32. Schumer RA, Julesz B. Binocular disparity modulation sensitivity to disparities offset from the plane of fixation. Vision Res. 1984.9. 33. McKee SP, Levi DM, Bowne SF. The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Res. 1990.10. 34. Yekta AA, Pickwell LD, Jenkins TCA. Binocular vision, age and symptoms. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989.11. 35. Jaschinski W, Švede A, Jainta S. Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses. Vision Res. 2008.13. 36. Farrel B, Li S, McKee SP. Disparity increment thresholds for gratings. J Vis. 2004.14. 37. Berends EM, Zhang ZL, Schor CM. Eye movements facilitate stereo-slant discrimination when horizontal disparity is noisy. J Vis. 2003.15. 38. Schor C. Fixation disparity:A steady state error of disparity induced vergence. Optom Vis Sci. 1980.16. 39. Kellnhofer P, Didyk P, Myszkowski K, Hefeeda MM, Seidel HP, Matusik W. GazeStereo3D: Seamless disparity manipulations. In: ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2016.17. 40. Read JCA, Phillipson GP, Glennerster A. Latitude and longitude vertical disparities. J Vis. 2009.18. 41. Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature. 1993.19. 42. Garding J, Porrill J, Mayhew JEW, Frisby JP. Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations. Vision Res. 1995.20. 43. Anzai A, Chowdhury SA, DeAngelis GC. Coding of stereoscopic depth information in visual areas V3 and V3A. J Neurosci. 2011.21. 44. Jaschinski W. The proximity-fixation-disparity curve and the preferred viewing distance at a visual display as an indicator of near vision fatigue. Optom Vis Sci. 2002.22. 45. Otero-Millan J, Macknik SL, Martinez-Conde S. Fixational eye movements and binocular vision. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 2014.23. 46. Collier JD, Rosenfield M. Accommodation and convergence during sustained computer work. Optometry. 2011.24. 47. Gonzalez F, Perez R. Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision. Prog Neurobiol. 1998.25. 48. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. Receptive field properties of neurons in area V3 of macaque monkey extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1987. “Binocular Matching” refs alerted by Mendeley 1. Geiger A, Roser M, Urtasun R. Efficient large-scale stereo matching. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2011.2. 2. Van Ee R, Anderson BL. Motion direction, speed and orientation in binocular matching. Nature. 2001.3. 3. Kuhlman SJ, Tring E, Trachtenberg JT. Fast-spiking interneurons have an initial orientation bias that is lost with vision. Nat Neurosci. 2011.4. 4. Wang BS, Sarnaik R, Cang J. Critical Period Plasticity Matches Binocular Orientation Preference in the Visual Cortex. Neuron. 2010.5. 5. Ramdya P, Engert F. Emergence of binocular functional properties in a monocular neural circuit. Nat Neurosci. 2008.6. 6. Banks MS, Gepshtein S, Landy MS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management of Microtropia
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.58.3.281 on 1 March 1974. Downloaded from Brit. J. Ophthal. (I974) 58, 28 I Management of microtropia J. LANG Zirich, Switzerland Microtropia or microstrabismus may be briefly described as a manifest strabismus of less than 50 with harmonious anomalous correspondence. Three forms can be distinguished: primary constant, primary decompensating, and secondary. There are three situations in which the ophthalmologist may be confronted with micro- tropia: (i) Amblyopia without strabismus; (2) Hereditary and familial strabismus; (3) Residual strabismus after surgery. This may be called secondary microtropia, for everyone will admit that in most cases of convergent strabismus perfect parallelism and bifoveal fixation are not achieved even after expert treatment. Microtropia and similar conditions were not mentioned by such well-known early copyright. practitioners as Javal, Worth, Duane, and Bielschowsky. The views of Maddox (i898), that very small angles were extremely rare, and that the natural tendency to fusion was much too strong to allow small angles to exist, appear to be typical. The first to mention small residual angles was Pugh (I936), who wrote: "A patient with monocular squint who has been trained to have equal vision in each eye and full stereoscopic vision with good amplitude of fusion may in 3 months relapse into a slight deviation http://bjo.bmj.com/ in the weaker eye and the vision retrogresses". Similar observations of small residual angles have been made by Swan, Kirschberg, Jampolsky, Gittoes-Davis, Cashell, Lyle, Broadman, and Gortz. There has been much discussion in both the British Orthoptic Journal and the American Orthoptic journal on the cause of this condition and ways of avoiding it.
    [Show full text]
  • Routine Eye Examination
    CET Continuing education Routine eye examination Part 3 – Binocular assessment In the third part of our series on the eye examination, Andrew Franklin and Bill Harvey look at the assessment and interpretation of binocular status. Module C8290, one general CET point, suitable for optometrists and DOs he assessment of binocular previous question. Leading questions function is often one of the should be avoided, especially when weaker areas of a routine, dealing with children. If they are out if observation of candidates of line ask the patient ‘Which one is out in the professional qualifica- of line with the X?’ Ttions examination is any guide. Tests are You should know before you start the done for no clearly logical reason, often test which line is seen by which eye. because they always have been, and in If you cannot remember it from last an order which defeats the object of the time, simply look at the target through testing. Binocular vision seems to be one the visor yourself (Figure 1). Even if of those areas that practitioners shy away you think you can remember, check from, and students often take an instant anyway, as it is possible for the polarisa- dislike to. Many retests and subsequent tion of the visor not to match that of the remakes of spectacles are the result of a Mallett Unit at distance or near or both, practitioner overlooking the effects of a Figure 1 A distance fixation disparity target especially if the visor is a replacement. change of prescription on the binocular If both eyes can see both bars, nobody status of the patient.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Fixation Disparity on Photogrammetric Processes
    The Effect of the Fixation Disparity on Photogrammetric Processes SANDOR A. VERES, Asst. Proj., Surveying and Mapping, Purdue University ABSTRACT: This paper reviews the function oj the human eyes in photogram­ metry, and discusses its limitations. The correction of the observation error is presented by mathematical derivations and practical examples. The paper points out the need for continued development of techniques in view of con­ stantly increasing requirements. INTRODUCTION study of coincidence is most important from the photogrammetric point of view. For a HOTOGRAMMETRIC instrumentation has undergone a revolutionary development study of this kind an instrument called a P horopter has been used. since the second World War. A precision photogrammetric instrument today is able to The horopter designed by Tschermak con­ provide measurement to within a precision of sists of thirteen steel channels mounted so as ± 3 microns. By using these precision in­ to converge to the midpoint of the inter­ struments the compensation of errors in­ pupillary base line of the two eyes of an volved in the measurements becomes of pri­ observer. The central channel lies in a median mary importance. The compensation of errors plane, perpendicular to the eyebase of the is based upon the geometrical knowledge of observer, and the others make angles of 1, 2. the source of errors. The human eye is in­ 4, 8, 12, and 16 degrees on each side of the volved in every photogrammetric measure­ central channel. A small vertical steel rod can ment; consequently the geometrical knowl­ slide smoothly in each channel and the rods edge of the errors due to the limi tation of the are mounted for use at visual distances of 20, human eye is very important.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature, Testing, and Variables Influencing
    THE NATURE, TESTING, AND VARIABLES INFLUENCING FIXATION DISPARITY; ROLE OF THE FUSION LOCK 1 by Leland W. Carr with Dr. James J. Saladin I ... *I Tl.e N.-1• .._1 Tufi"), A.l IJ.,.;.,l/.s I.{l..•• :? F1*'/:·.., /);,,_,. ; ~ R.lc. OF 'Tlc. ~="••1•.. C. •• l( I Introduction A fixation disparity is a small angular measurement of the mis­ alignment of the two eyes which can occur while still permitting single, fused binocular vision. It represents a small error in the aiming of the eyes which occurs without diplopia being detected. Fixation disparity is allowed because of the slight "slippage" pro­ vided to the fusional system through the existence of Panum's fusional areas. So long as binocular alignment is precise enough to place the two retinal images of a single object within corre­ sponding Panum's areas, the final perception is likely to be single and fused. Sensory fusion thus occurs in spite of a small error in motor fusion. A slight muscle imbalance is the rule, rather than the excep­ tion in individuals even with normal assymptomatic binocular systems. It is rare that all twelve extraocular muscles are precisely bal­ anced in their agonist-antagonist relationships, and thus the inate drive to achieve single vision requires a fusional effort to over­ come existing imbalance. When binocularity is dissociated (as with a covertest) the fusional drive is interrupted and the eyes deviate out of alignment under the influence of the muscle imbalance. This deviation under dissociation is referred to as the heterophoria. When both eyes are permitted to view without dissociative conditions the fusional drive to achieve single binocular vision pulls the eyes toward alignment in opposition to the phoric "stress" operating to deviate the alignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction
    OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction OPTOMETRY: THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION Doctors of optometry are independent primary health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. There are approximately 36,000 full-time-equivalent doctors of optometry currently in practice in the United States. Optometrists practice in more than 6,500 communities across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care providers in more than 3,500 communities. The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all of which enhance the quality of life. OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH ACCOMMODATIVE AND VERGENCE DYSFUNCTION Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D., Principal Author Carole R. Burns, O.D. Susan A. Cotter, O.D. Kent M. Daum, O.D., Ph.D. John R. Griffin, M.S., O.D. Mitchell M. Scheiman, O.D. Revised by: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D. December 2010 Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Brock String and the Horopter: a Perspective
    Brock String and the with neurological disorders such as cerebral 2 3 Horopter: A Perspective palsy and traumatic brain injury. A question that has been posed to us on Kenneth J. Ciuffreda, OD, PhD, more than one occasion, frequently with a FAAO, FCOVD-A, FARVO look ranging from inquisitiveness to distain, Diana P. Ludlam, BS, COVT is, “Why the horopter?” Certainly, this is a fair question. Unfortunately, the horopter seems Barry Tannen, OD, FCOVD to be misunderstood by many, and hence Naveen K. Yadav, BS Optom, the question. In our lectures, we have always MS, PhD, FAAO emphasized the concept of the horopter and its clinical importance, with its clinical analog being the all-important “Brock String.”4 Our Over the past number of years, we immediate reply to this question has been, have been involved in the teaching “Why not, as the concept of the horopter is of both normal and abnormal the underpinning for, and basis of, nearly ALL binocular vision at several optometry aspects of normal and abnormal binocular colleges, national and international vision”. This answer usually results in a pause, vision meetings, and vision research sometimes followed by the request for an institutes and hospitals. This has explanation, which we gladly provide in great involved both the underlying detail with numerous clinical examples. theory and its multitude of clinical The horopter is a wonderful pedagogical implications, including the sensory, and clinical tool, as it blends and integrates PERSPECTIVE motor, and perceptual domains and basic aspects
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of a Unique Anaglyphic Vertical Fixation Disparity Test to the Sheedy Disparometer
    Pacific University CommonKnowledge College of Optometry Theses, Dissertations and Capstone Projects 5-2003 Comparison of a unique anaglyphic vertical fixation disparity test to the Sheedy disparometer Paul Stasik Pacific University Randy Kelly Pacific University Matt Hoppe Pacific University Recommended Citation Stasik, Paul; Kelly, Randy; and Hoppe, Matt, "Comparison of a unique anaglyphic vertical fixation disparity test to the Sheedy disparometer" (2003). College of Optometry. 1456. https://commons.pacificu.edu/opt/1456 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations and Capstone Projects at CommonKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Optometry by an authorized administrator of CommonKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comparison of a unique anaglyphic vertical fixation disparity test ot the Sheedy disparometer Abstract The clinical gold standard for deriving vertical prism prescriptions is the patient's vertical associated phoria (The relieving prism to bring a vertical fixation disparity ot zero). It is generally accepted that the most accurate device used to measure fixation disparity at nearpoint is the Sheedy disparometer. However, the Sheedy disparometer is relatively large, expensive and not currently manufactured. These factors may make measurements of vertical associated phorias less appealing and accessible to practitioners. This study evaluated the vertical associated phoria measurements of twenty non- asthenopic subjects with measurable vertical phorias. Vertical associated phoria measurements were made using the Sheedy disparometer and a unique inexpensive anaglyphic vertical fixation disparity test composed of a card with a specifically designed edr and green image and a pair of standard anaglyphic glasses for the patient to wear.
    [Show full text]
  • Causing and Curing Infantile Esotropia in Primates
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Open Access Publications 2007 Causing and curing infantile esotropia in primates: The oler of decorrelated binocular input (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis) Lawrence Tychsen Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs Recommended Citation Tychsen, Lawrence, ,"Causing and curing infantile esotropia in primates: The or le of decorrelated binocular input (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis)." Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.105,. 564-593. (2007). https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/3298 This Open Access Publication is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CAUSING AND CURING INFANTILE ESOTROPIA IN PRIMATES: THE ROLE OF DECORRELATED BINOCULAR INPUT (AN AMERICAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THESIS) BY Lawrence Tychsen, MD ABSTRACT Purpose: Human infants at greatest risk for esotropia are those who suffer cerebral insults that could decorrelate signals from the 2 eyes during an early critical period of binocular, visuomotor development. The author reared normal infant monkeys, under conditions of binocular decorrelation, to determine if this alone was sufficient to cause esotropia and associated behavioral as well as neuroanatomic deficits. Methods: Binocular decorrelation was imposed using prism-goggles for durations of 3 to 24 weeks (in 6 experimental, 2 control monkeys). Behavioral recordings were obtained, followed by neuroanatomic analysis of ocular dominance columns and binocular, horizontal connections in the striate visual cortex (area V1).
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Vision
    0331—Foundations of Clinical Ophthalmology—Ch24—R2—05-21-04 15:35:55— advantage in detection of faint images and rejection of the optical distortions within the eyes. 24 4. The presence of two mobile eyes allows the organism to converge the line of sight on distant objects and obtain a reading as to their absolute distance. 5. And, probably the most dramatic reason for binocu- Binocular lar vision, two eyes permit stereoscopic depth per- ception–the ability to use the differences in the im- ages caused by each eye viewing from a slightly Vision different viewpoint, known as binocular disparities, to perceive distance in the third dimension of visual space. Presumably all animals develop a visual system with Christopher W. Tyler some weighting among these different factors. Most lower animals take advantage of the possibility of a 360- degree field of view by having the eyes pointing in op- posite directions. This advantage applies to fish, many birds, and to a large extent, mammals that are preyed upon. However, most predatory animals, from spiders and crustaceans through birds to mammals and humans, Eyes come in pairs, providing special capabilities that tend to have the eyes facing in the same direction. This are not available to a single imaging system. This chap- arrangement is, presumably, to take advantage of stereo- ter provides an overview of the ways that visual process- scopic depth perception, which has been demonstrated ing has evolved to utilize the joint capabilities of a dual in humans, monkeys, cats, and falcons, and is likely to optical system for the perception of the third spatial be widespread across other species.2–5 dimension, of the visual deficits that can occur specific Actually, almost all animals show some degree of to the binocular coupling of this system, and of current binocular overlap, even those with a full 360-degree approaches to ameliorating those deficits.
    [Show full text]
  • Foveal Diplopia Thresholds and Fixation Disparities
    Perception & Psychophysics 1981.30 (4), 321·329 Foveal diplopia thresholds and fixation disparities A.L.DUWAER and G. van den BRINK Department ofBiologicaland Medical Physics, Erasmus University Rotterdam' 3000DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands Comparison of the magnitude and intrinsic spread of foveal diplopia thresholds with the ac­ curacy of ocular alignment as determined with a subjective alignment method shows that: the accuracy of alignment in the vertical direction (within 1-2 min) is remarkably good and much better than in the horizontal direction; the largest disparities occurring due to restricted align­ ment accuracy are usually substantially smaller than the foveal diplopia thresholds; inter­ individual variability in the magnitude of foveal diplopia thresholds is not due only to inter­ individual variability in the alignment accuracy; and the spread of foveal diplopia thresholds exceeds the spread of ocular alignment, which implies that the noise in the foveal disparity do­ main is not only due to the restricted alignment accuracy but also to sensory processes. Finally, the data confirm that, unlike the case with diplopia thresholds, the spread of stereoscopic thresholds is not affected by the restricted alignment accuracy. When an observer with normal binocular vision but also for the reported foveal diplopia thresholds looks with both eyes at an object, the eyes align with (see, e.g., Ouwaer & van den Brink, 1981). respect to the fixated part of the object in such a way Because of these variabilities, the comparative that the images in the foveae of the two eyes fall on magnitudes of fixation disparities and foveal dip­ nearly corresponding retinal locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction
    OPTOMETRY: OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE Doctors of optometry are independent primary health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. There are approximately 32,000 full-time equivalent doctors of optometry currently in practice in the United States. Optometrists practice in more than 7,000 communities across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care provider in more than 4,300 communities. Care of the Patient with The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye Accommodative and care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all of which enhance the quality of life. Vergence Dysfunction OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH ACCOMMODATIVE AND VERGENCE DYSFUNCTION Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Accommodative or Vergence Dysfunction: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D., Principal Author Carole R. Burns, O.D. Susan A. Cotter, O.D. Kent M. Daum, O.D., Ph.D. John R. Griffin, M.S., O.D. Mitchell M. Scheiman, O.D. Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: John F. Amos, O.D., M.S., Chair Kerry L.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Fixation Disparity During Reading
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Journal of Eye Movement Research Journal of Eye Movement Research 3(3):1, 1-13 “Trait” and “state” aspects of fixation disparity during reading Stephanie Jainta Wolfgang Jaschinski Leibniz Research Centre for Working Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors Environment and Human Factors In our study, 14 subjects read 60 sentences from the Potsdam Sentence Corpus twice (viewing distance: 60 cm), while eye movements were measured with the EyeLink II. We analyzed fixation disparities for complete sentence replications (N=388). After subtracting the average fixation disparity of each sentence from each observation (which gave the “state” fixation disparity), 99% of all remaining fixation disparities were aligned, i.e. smaller than one character width (20 min arc) – depending mostly on incoming saccade amplitude and fixation position. Additionally, we measured the heterophoria for each sub- ject during calibration and found a qualitative relationship between average, individual measures of fixation disparity (“trait” fixation disparity) and heterophoria, after dividing the sample in 3 groups of esophore, exophore and orthophore subjects. We showed that the magnitude of “trait” fixation disparity was biased by the direction of heterophoria: the more eso the heterophoria, the more eso the average sentence fixation disparity. In sum, despite a large “trait” fixation disparity (in the range of -6.6 to +33.6 min arc), “state” fixation disparities within a sentence were on average -0.9 (± 8.7) min arc and, thus, as precise as needed, i.e. within the expected extent of Panum’s area.
    [Show full text]