Chicago Appeals Summer 1998

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chicago Appeals Summer 1998 Presents Looped in Chicago Appeals at the 1998 Summer NABC Plus cases from the 1998 ITT, CNTC and World Bridge Championships Edited by Rich Colker CONTENTS FOREWORD Foreword ii We continue our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always, our goals are to provide information and to stimulate change for the better. We hope The Expert Panel iii we have done this in a manner that is entertaining as well as instructive. As in previous casebooks, we’ve provided our panelists with the opportunity Cases from Chicago to comment on and rate each Director’s ruling and Committee’s decision. While not Tempo (Cases 1-10) 1 every panelist rated or commented on every case, many did. The two ratings Unauthorized Information (UI: Cases 11-12) 52 (averaged over the panelists) are presented after each write-up, expressed as Misinformation (MI: Cases 13-20) 62 percentages. These ratings also appear in a summary table near the end of the Claims (Case 21) 91 casebook, for handy reference. A few words about these numerical ratings are in order. They are intended to Cases from the 1998 International Team Trials (Cases 22-25) 93 give the reader a general idea of the panel’s assessment of the performance of the Director and Committee relative to the best possible resolution that could have been Case from the 1998 Canadian National Team Championship (Case 26) 110 achieved. They can be interpreted as percentages. They are not valid, nor should they be used, to compare the performance of Directors and Committees. Each group Cases from the 1998 World Bridge Championships (Cases 27-34) 118 is rated on a different set of criteria. Directors are rated on their handling of the Tempo (Cases 27-29) 119 situation at the table. They are expected to quickly determine the pertinent facts, Misinformation (MI: Cases 30-34) 137 apply the right laws and often, because of limited time and bridge-expertise, to make “provisional” rulings so the game may progress normally – expecting that Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists 159 their rulings may be reviewed and overturned on appeal. For example, the laws in many situations require the Director to rule in favor of the non-offending side when Closing Remarks From the Editor 163 in doubt, allowing a Committee to sort things out later. Committees, on the other hand, are rated on all aspects of their decisions including their finding of facts, The Panel’s Director and Committee Ratings 170 application of the laws and use of bridge judgment appropriate to the event and the players involved. Committees’ ratings also depend on such things as a panelist’s NABC Appeals Committee 171 philosophy about the use of procedural and appeal-without-merit penalties. A Committee which issues such penalties could be down-graded by panelists who dislike the use of such penalties, even though they agree with the Committee’s assessment of the behavior involved. Once again, I wish to thank all of the hard-working people without whose efforts these casebooks would not be possible: The scribes and Committee chairs who labored to chronicle the details of each case; the panelists for their hard work and devotion to a truly arduous task for which they receive only our praise (and occasional abuse); and of course Linda Trent (formerly Weinstein, a Christmas bride – congratulations!), who manages the case write-ups at NABCs and is in charge of “quality control” for these casebooks. As always, she is truly indispensable. My sincere thanks to all of you. I hope that my work has not diminished any of yours. Rich Colker, January, 1999 Abbreviations used throughout this casebook: LA Logical Alternative MI Misinformation UI Unauthorized Information i ii THE EXPERT PANEL basketball and softball. While Bobby was a member of the original ACES from 1968 to 1974, he was a pioneer in writing computer programs that generate practice Henry Bethe, 54, was born in Los Alamos, New Mexico. He is a graduate of bridge hands and evaluate bidding probabilities. Bobby has won three Bermuda Columbia University and currently resides in Ithaca, New York. He has a son, Paul, Bowls, a World Mixed Teams and a World Swiss Teams as well as more than thirty who is 21. His other interests include stamp collecting, baseball statistics and other National Championships. mathematical recreations. He is a Vice-Chairman of the National Appeals Committee. He won the Life Master Men’s Pairs in 1969 but is proudest of winning Jeff Meckstroth, 42, was born in Springfield, Ohio. He currently resides in Tampa, the third bracket of a Regional Knockout partnered by his son Paul at the Chicago Florida with his wife Shirlee and his two sons, Matt, 13, and Rob, 15. He is a Bridge NABC. Professional who enjoys golf and movies in his spare time. Every year his name can be found near the top of the Barry Crane Top 500 list. Jeff is a Grand Life Master Bart Bramley, 51, was born in Poughkeepsie, New York. He grew up in in both the WBF and ACBL. He has won four world titles (his first at age 25 in Connecticut and Boston and graduated MIT, where Ken Lebensold was an essential 1981) and numerous National Championships including eight Spingolds, four of influence in his bridge development. He currently resides in Chicago with his which were won consecutively from 1993 to 1996. longtime companion Judy Wadas. He is a stock options trader at the CBOE. Bart is a sports fan (especially baseball and specifically the NY Yankees), a golf Barry Rigal, 40, was born in London, England. He is married to Sue Picus and enthusiast, enjoys word games and has been a Deadhead for many years. He was currently resides in New York City where he is a bridge writer and analyst who 1997 ACBL Player of the Year. His NABC wins include the 1989 Vanderbilt and contributes to many periodicals worldwide. He enjoys theater, music, arts and the 1997 Reisinger. In the 1998 World Championships he was second in the World travel. Barry is also an outstanding Vugraph commentator, demonstrating an Par Contest and third in the Rosenblum Teams. He also played in the 1991 Bermuda extensive knowledge of the many bidding systems played by pairs all over the Bowl and was captain of the 1996 U.S. Olympiad team. world. He coached the USA I team to the Venice Cup in 1997. He is proudest of his fourth-place finish in the 1990 Geneva World Mixed Pairs, winning the Common Jon Brissman, 54, was born in Abilene, Texas. He attended Purdue University and Market Mixed Teams in 1987 and winning the Gold Cup in 1991. earned a B.A. from Parsons College, an M.A. from Northeast Missouri State University, and a J.D. from Western State University College of Law. He operates Michael Rosenberg, 44, was born in New York where he has resided since 1978. a small law office in San Bernardino, California, teaches at the Los Angeles College He is a stock options trader. His mother, father and sister reside in Scotland where of Chiropractic, and serves as a judge pro tem in small claims and municipal court. he grew up. His hobbies include music. Widely regarded as the expert’s expert, He served as Co-Chair of the National Appeals Committee from 1982-88 and was Michael won the Rosenblum KO and was second in the Open Pairs in the 1994 reappointed in 1997. A Good Will Committee member, he believes that a pleasant Albuquerque World Bridge Championships. At the 1998 World Championships he demeanor coaxes forth his partnership's best efforts. won the World Par Contest. He was the 1994 ACBL Player of the Year. He believes the bridge accomplishment he will be proudest of is still in the future. Michael is Larry Cohen, 39, was born in New York. He is a graduate of SUNY at Albany. He also a leading spokesman for ethical bridge play and for policies that encourage currently resides in Boca Raton, Florida. He is a Bridge Professional and author of higher standards. four books that include the best sellers To Bid or Not To Bid and Following the Law. Larry is a Co-Director of the Bridge World Master Solver’s Club. He enjoys Dave Treadwell, 86, was born in Belleville, New Jersey and currently resides in golf in his spare time. He has won sixteen National Championships and was second Wilmington, Delaware. He is a retired Chemical Engineer, a graduate of MIT and in the 1998 World Open Pairs. was employed by DuPont for more than 40 years where his responsibilities included the initial production of Teflon for introduction to the marketplace. He has three Ron Gerard, 55, was born in New York. He is a graduate of Harvard and Michigan grown children, three grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. His hobbies Law School (JD). He currently resides in White Plains, NY with his wife Joan include blackjack and magic squares. The bridge accomplishment he is proudest of (District 3 Director) where he is an attorney. Ron is a college basketball fan and is breaking the 20,000 masterpoint barrier. He believes bridge can be competitive enjoys classical music and tennis. He is proudest of winning both the Spingold and and intellectual but above all can be and must be fun. Blue Ribbon Pairs in 1981. Each year from 1990 to 1995 he made it to at least the round of eight in the Vanderbilt; he played in three finals (winning in Fort Worth, Howard Weinstein, 45, was born in Minneapolis.
Recommended publications
  • Bernard Magee's Acol Bidding Quiz
    Number: 178 UK £3.95 Europe €5.00 October 2017 Bernard Magee’s Acol Bidding Quiz This month we are dealing with hands when, if you choose to pass, the auction will end. You are West in BRIDGEthe auctions below, playing ‘Standard Acol’ with a weak no-trump (12-14 points) and four-card majors. 1. Dealer North. Love All. 4. Dealer West. Love All. 7. Dealer North. Love All. 10. Dealer East. E/W Game. ♠ 2 ♠ A K 3 ♠ A J 10 6 5 ♠ 4 2 ♥ A K 8 7 N ♥ A 8 7 6 N ♥ 10 9 8 4 3 N ♥ K Q 3 N W E W E W E W E ♦ J 9 8 6 5 ♦ A J 2 ♦ Void ♦ 7 6 5 S S S S ♣ Q J 3 ♣ Q J 6 ♣ A 7 4 ♣ K Q J 6 5 West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South Pass Pass Pass 1♥ 1♠ Pass Pass 1♣ 2♦1 Pass 1♥ 1♠ ? ? Pass Dbl Pass Pass 2♣ 2♠ 3♥ 3♠ ? 4♥ 4♠ Pass Pass 1Weak jump overcall ? 2. Dealer North. Love All. 5. Dealer West. Love All. 8. Dealer East. Love All. 11. Dealer North. N/S Game. ♠ 2 ♠ A K 7 6 5 ♠ A 7 6 5 4 3 ♠ 4 3 2 ♥ A J N ♥ 4 N ♥ A K 3 N ♥ A 7 6 N W E W E W E W E ♦ 8 7 2 ♦ A K 3 ♦ 2 ♦ A 8 7 6 4 S S S S ♣ K Q J 10 5 4 3 ♣ J 10 8 2 ♣ A 5 2 ♣ 7 6 West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South Pass Pass Pass 1♠ 2♥ Pass Pass 3♦ Pass 1♣ 3♥ Dbl ? ? Pass 3♥ Pass Pass 4♥ 4♠ Pass Pass ? ? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rubensohl Convention
    Review sheet 61UZ-2 10/01/2021 The Rubensohl convention You will use the Rubensohl convention in response to your partner's 1 NT opening, but after an overcall. Here is the simplified theory of this convention. After a natural overcall 2 ♦, 2 ♥ or 2 ♠ Any level 2 bid is natural Above 2 NT any bid is a Jacoby transfer. 2 NT is artificial (Jacoby for ♣) An impossible Jacoby becomes a Stayman A double is a take-out double : it could be a Stayman with 8 HCP, or show a balanced hand with 8 HCP or more. S W N E 1NT 2 ♦ 2 ♥ 5 4 3 A Q 7 6 5 6 5 4 8 7 ♠ ♠ ♠ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♣ ♣ ♣ ♦ ♦ Exercise E5867 2 ♥ showing 5 ♥ cards and a maximum of 7 HCP. S W N E 1NT 2 ♥ 3 ♦ K J 5 4 4 A J 5 4 Q 10 9 2 ♠ ♠ ♠ ♠ ♥ ♣ ♣ ♣ ♣ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Exercise E5871 3 ♦ Impossible Jacoby (the opponent's overcall is ♥, therefore the responder can't be willing to play ♥ !) : this is a Stayman with 4 ♠ cards and short ♥ : game forcing Page 1 Nous retrouver sur www.ibridge.fr vous permet de parfaire votre bridge. En jouant des donnes, en accédant aux leçons de votre niveau et au recueil des fiches techniques. Review sheet 61UZ-2 10/01/2021 The Rubensohl convention After a natural level 2 overcall Bidding a suit at level 2 is natural and non forcing : the responder holds a maximum of 7 HCP Doubling is not punitive : A double requires a minimum of 7-8 HCP and most of the time shows a hand with which the responder would have bid 2 NT (with no overcall).
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding Notes
    Bidding Notes Paul F. Dubois February 19, 2015 CONTENTS 1 Preliminaries 6 1.1 How to Use This Book.....................................6 1.2 Casual Partners.........................................7 1.3 Acknowledgments.......................................7 1.4 Notation and Nomenclature...................................7 1.5 The Captain Concept......................................8 2 Hand Evaluation 9 2.1 Basic System..........................................9 2.1.1 Adjusting to the Auction................................ 10 2.1.2 Losing Trick Count................................... 10 2.2 Bergen Method......................................... 11 2.3 Examples............................................ 11 2.4 What Bid To Open....................................... 11 3 Reverses 13 3.1 Reverses by Opener....................................... 13 3.1.1 Responding To Opener’s Reverse........................... 13 3.2 Reverses By Responder..................................... 14 4 Opening Notrump 15 4.1 How To Choose A Response To 1N.............................. 15 4.1.1 Responding With No Major Suit Or Long Minor................... 16 4.1.2 Responding With A Major Suit Or Long Minor.................... 16 4.2 Stayman Convention...................................... 16 4.3 Major Transfers......................................... 17 4.3.1 When the transfer is doubled or overcalled...................... 18 4.3.2 Interference before transfers.............................. 19 4.4 When Responder Is 5-4 In The Majors............................
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Landfill Equipment Approved
    Congratulations2014 GRADUATES!Colby High School Brewster High School Golden Plains High School Heartland Christian School Thomas County Learning Center GraduationGraduation SectionSection InsideInside 75¢ Friday, May 16, 2014 COLBY Friday May 16, 2014 Volume 125, Number 78 Serving Thomas County since 1888 10 pages FFREEREE PPRESSRESS Landfill equipment approved By Heather Alwin Jumper said he doesn’t need a Colby Free Press heavy pickup, and a two-wheel [email protected] drive would be fine. Commissioner Paul Steele sug- The Thomas County landfill gested Jumper get proposals from may be getting a new pickup and area dealers, but to make sure he a front-end loader, assuming the does not take too much out of his budget will stretch that far. capital budget since the landfill Landfill Supervisor Larry wants to replace a front-end load- Jumper told county commission- er next year. ers at their meeting Monday that Jumper said he does want to one of his pickups had a bad fuel trade in one of their loaders or pump and would need about $800 perhaps sell it to another, smaller or $900 in repairs. Jumper said he landfill because they modified the fears the truck will require more machine to make it ideal for land- repairs, so he wants to get a re- fill use. placement. In other business, the commis- The commissioners asked sioners Jumper for details, and Jumper • Heard a report from Sheriff told them the 1998 pickup has Rod Taylor that gates are being about 160,000 miles on it. The left open on land east of town landfill uses it six days a week, he where the landowner allows walk- said.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Magee's Acol Bidding Quiz
    Number: 180 UK £3.95 Europe €5.00 December 2017 Bernard Magee’s Acol Bidding Quiz This month we are dealing with hands when the opponents open with a weak 1NT. You are West in the BRIDGEauctions below, playing ‘Standard Acol’ with a weak no-trump (12-14 points) and four-card majors. 1. Dealer South. Love All. 4. Dealer North. Love All. 7. Dealer North. Game All. 10. Dealer North. Love All. ♠ K Q J 6 5 4 ♠ 7 ♠ 8 7 6 5 ♠ K 7 6 5 ♥ A 7 N ♥ A 7 6 4 3 N ♥ Q 4 3 2 N ♥ 4 2 N ♦ A K 2 W E ♦ A 8 4 3 W E ♦ 7 6 5 W E ♦ A 9 2 W E ♣ 4 3 S ♣ Q J 2 S ♣ 4 2 S ♣ K J 6 5 S West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South 1NT 1NT 2♠ Pass 1NT Dbl Pass 1NT Pass 2♦1 ? ? ? Pass 2♥ Pass Pass ? 1Transfer to hearts 2. Dealer South. Love All. 5. Dealer North. Love All. 8. Dealer North. Love All. 11. Dealer South. Love All. ♠ 6 ♠ K 8 4 2 ♠ A 7 ♠ 4 2 ♥ 4 2 N ♥ A 6 3 N ♥ 9 7 6 N ♥ J 9 8 7 N ♦ 9 7 3 W E ♦ 7 6 5 W E ♦ Q J 6 5 W E ♦ 8 7 W E S S S S ♣ A Q J 7 6 5 4 ♣ 7 6 5 ♣ J 7 6 5 ♣ A K 9 5 2 West North East South West North East South West North East South West North East South 1NT 2♠ Pass 1NT Dbl 2♦ 1NT 1NT 1 ? ? ? Pass 2♥ Dbl 2♠ ? 1Transfer to spades 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Suit Forcing Is a Convention That Every Club Player Will Have Heard of but Will Not Necessarily Make Use of As Often As They Might
    Fourth Suit Forcing is a convention that every club player will have heard of but will not necessarily make use of as often as they might. Some players seem to actively avoid it, perhaps feeling that their partnership knowledge of the convention is not what it should be. FSF is often introduced as an asking bid - the FSF bidder will often be looking to play in a no-trump contract but only if he can establish whether the partnership has a stopper in the fourth suit. His FSF bid asks partner whether he has a stop in that suit. If so, partner bids no-trumps next, jumping to Three No Trumps, if that option is available, to show a stopper in the fourth suit and a strong hand. With no stopper in the fourth suit, partner will rebid one of his suits or else support my first suit with (usually) three-card support. Here are some other bits of info that you might find useful. 1) A FSF bid is not just an asking bid, it is also a 'telling' bid. Specifically, it tells partner that you do not have a suitable alternative natural bid available. Example QJ63 A1095 72 KJ8 Partner opens One Diamond, you respond One Heart and partner rebids Two Clubs. What do you bid next ? It is wrong to bid Two Spades. You have a perfectly descriptive bid of Two No-Trumps available, showing 11-12 points with a spade stop. Perhaps you want to bid Two Spades to see if partner also has four of them ..
    [Show full text]
  • Standard American System Notes Noble Shore
    Standard American System Notes Noble Shore Pages Definitions 2 1NT opening 3-10 1H/S openings 11-14 1D/C openings 15-18 Weak openings 19-21 Strong openings 22-23 Overcalls 24-25 Takeout Doubles 26-27 Slam Bidding 28-29 Carding 30 Sample ACBL Convention Cards 31-32 Index of Conventions 33 Author’s Note 34 Definitions A balanced hand contains no singletons or voids and at most one doubleton. Points refer to a total value of a hand, including shape. HCP refers only to a hand’s high-card points. A natural suited bid shows 4+ cards in its suit. A natural notrump bid shows a desire to play in notrump. A non-natural bid is called an artificial bid. A convention is a commonly used artificial bid that has been given a name. Conventions are not part of Standard American, but many are commonly or nearly-universally played. A forcing bid demands a bid from partner if the next opponent passes. A forcing bid is also known as one- round-forcing. A signoff is a bid that strongly requests a pass or correction to another suit shown by the player signing off. Partner normally may not make a bid in any suit not shown by the signing-off player. A signoff usually occurs when the captain of the auction places the final contract. An invitational bid communicates that the partnership should bid a game unless partner has very minimal strength for previous actions. A game-forcing bid means that the partnership cannot play any contract below 3NT.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Use of Transfers in and out of Competition by Marc Smith, Edited by Steve Turner
    An Overview of the Use of Transfers in and out of Competition by Marc Smith, edited by Steve Turner https://sites.google.com/site/bridgequarter/home Contents Introduction to Applications of Transfers ............................................................... 1 1. 1 NT – (2 Suit) – ? [Responder Has Shape] ........................................................ 3 2. 1 NT – (2 Suit) – ? [Responder Is Balanced] ....................................................... 7 3. 1 NT – (Conventional Suit Bid) – ? .................................................................... 11 4. (1 NT) or (Multi 2 d) – Double – (Pass) – ? ....................................................... 17 5. 1 s – (Pass) – 1 NT – (Pass); ? ........................................................................... 23 6. (Suit) – Suit [No Jump] – (Pass) – ? ................................................................... 27 7. (1-Minor) – Double – (Pass) – ? ........................................................................ 35 8. (1 Major) – Double – (Pass) – ? ........................................................................ 41 9. 1 Major – (Double) – ? ...................................................................................... 47 10. 2/3/4 Suit – (Double) – ? ................................................................................ 53 11. 1c [Strong] – (Bid) – ? .................................................................................... 57 12. 1 Suit – (Suit) [No Jump] – ? ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District 4Spot
    2011 DISTRICT 4 WEBSITE WWW.DISTRICT4.INFO Unit Websites 112 - acblunit112.org 120 - nepab.com 121 - unit121bridge.com 133-lvbabridge.org 141 - philadelphiabridge.info 168 - http://web2.acbl.org/hosted/units/unit168/index.htm 190 - unit190.org .217 - unit217.nepab.com PRESIDENT RICK ROWLAND [email protected] 1ST VICE PRESIDENT WALTER MITCHELL 2ND VICE PRESIDENT TOM WEIK SECRETARY EDITOR BILL BAUER Elaine Landow TREASURER 2556 Morris Road RICK ROWLAND Lansdale, PA 19446 DISTRICT DIRECTOR 215-699-6134 CRAIG ROBINSON e-mail: 215-699-6134 [email protected] [email protected] All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without permission of the editor. 2 District 4Spot PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE RICK ROWLAND The Syracuse regional gave me the opportunity to meet many new folks from the northern part of the district. Gerry Radway, Margie Spence and their committee put together a wonderful event. The Valley Forge regional was smaller than we had hoped for, but has a great new venue. The Dolce Valley Forge and its staff were very accommodating. As Carole King once said, I felt the earth move under my feet. Tuesday’s earthquake was a bit scary for those of us who had never experienced one before, but the bridge went on. Continuing with the 70’s music theme, Gloria Gaynor wrote “I will survive”. Unfortunately, the tournament didn’t survive Hurricane Irene. Out of an abundance of caution, the District 4 Board voted to cancel Saturday night and Sunday bridge sessions based on information available at the time. I look forward to seeing you all in Lancaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Forcing Bids
    Forcing Bids 2/25/14 Forcing Bids 1, Polly Siegel 1 Goals • Understand which bids are forcing/non-forcing • Understand when to make a forcing bid • Learn some rules to guide your bidding when you’re not sure Before you spend -me learning new conven-ons, it’s essen-al to know which bids in standard bidding are forcing or not 2/25/14 Forcing Bids 1, Polly Siegel 2 Basic assumpFons • Bidding system: 2-over-1 game force • We’ll assume only the most basic convenFon – Forcing NT (as part of two-over-one) – Stayman and transfers over 1NT openings – Jacoby 2NT – New-minor forcing – Drury 2/25/14 Forcing Bids 1, Polly Siegel 3 Terminology overview: reverses • Hand strength is 17+ • First suit bid is longer than the second 2/25/14 Forcing Bids 1, Polly Siegel 4 Terminology overview: jump shiUs • Hand strength is 19+ • First suit bid is longer than second • Second bid is a jump 2/25/14 Forcing Bids 1, Polly Siegel 5 What’s forcing in an uncontested aucFon? • General rules: – a new suit by an unpassed responder is forcing – once a game force is established, keep bidding unFl you reach game • What specific types of bids are forcing? – A reverse by opener is a one-round force – A new suit aer a suit has been agreed upon is forcing one round – Any bid aer opener has jumped is forcing to game – A strong 2C opener is forcing to 2NT or 3M aer double negave – A jump shiU by opener is game forcing – Any bid aer a game force has been established is game forcing – ConvenFonal bids are forcing, and some also establish a game force 2/25/14 Forcing Bids 1, Polly Siegel 6 Why is it important to know which bids are forcing? • Bridge is a partnership game.
    [Show full text]
  • ABF Newsletter – December 2020
    NEWSLETTER AUSTRALIAN BRIDGE FEDERATION INC. Editor: Brad Coles ([email protected]) No. 206 December 2020 Approved for Print Post S65001/00163 ABN 70 053 651 666 Paul and Nevena teaching over 300 people on Zoom Australian Bridge Federation Inc. ABN 70 053 651 666 PO Box 397, Fyshwick ACT 2609 Unit 4/51 Tennant Street, Fyshwick ACT 2609 Phone: (02) 6239 2265 Fax: (02) 6239 1816 Email: [email protected] DECEMBER 2020 ISSUE President’s Report: Allison Stralow 4 ABF Marketing Report: Peter Cox 5 Friends Of Youth Bridge: David Stern 8 The James O’Sullivan Trust: Kim Frazer 9 FrontPaul cover: and Nevena Paul teachingMarston over provided 300 people three on Zoom online four-week beginner’s courses titled Introduction Bridge Future Fund 10 To Bridge, using Zoom and BBO, supported with Meet Bob Jacobs 10 promotion by ABF Marketing. Paul and Nevena Djurovic taught over 700 beginners and provided Masters Of Bridge: David Anderson 11 practice sessions, notes and videos with more ABF Management Committee 12 than 300 people online at the one time. VBA Bulletin League 12 Youth Bridge News: Leigh & Bianca Gold 13 DEADLINE FOR ABF Teaching Column: Joan Butts 14 FEBRUARY EDITION Improve Your Defence: Ron Klinger 2, 15 Poetry Corner: Art Desmond 15 ADVERTISING: 15 JANUARY Bridge Into The 21st Century: Paul Lavings 16 ARTICLES: 12 JANUARY Workshops With Will: William Jenner-O’Shea 18 How Would You Play? Barbara Travis 17, 19 DISCLAIMER: It is ABF policy Around The Clubs 20 not to accept advertising from persons or organisations believed A Game At The Club: Barbara Travis 21 to be unreliable or financially ABC Radio Awards 24 irresponsible.
    [Show full text]