Avifaunal Specialist Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Avifaunal Specialist Study Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility AVIFAUNAL SPECIALIST STUDY Proposed San Kraal Wind Energy Facility near Noupoort, Northern Cape Compiled September 2017 Prepared by: Chris van Rooyen Consulting Prepared for: ARCUS 1 Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility CONTENTS OF THE SPECIALIST REPORT – CHECKLIST Regulation GNR 326 of 4 December 2014, as amended 7 April 2017, Section of Report Appendix 6 (a) details of the specialist who prepared the report; and the expertise of Front pg. 3 that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be Back pg. 112 specified by the competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report Section 2 was prepared; (cA) an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the Sections 3 and 4 specialist report; (cB) a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of Sections 6, 9, 10, the proposed development and levels of acceptable change; (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the Section 7 and Appendix 2 relevance of the season to the outcome of the assessment; (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or Sections 3, 4, 7 and 9 carrying out the specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site Section 13. No site plan related to the proposed activity or activities and its associated structures alternative was provided and infrastructure, inclusive of a site plan identifying site alternatives; (g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; Section 13 (h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated structures Section 13 and infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; (i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps Section 4 in knowledge; (j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such findings Section 12 on the impact of the proposed activity, including identified alternatives on the environment, or activities; (k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; Section 9 (l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; Section 9 (m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or Section 9 environmental authorisation; (n) a reasoned opinion— Section 9 and 12 i. as to whether the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised; iA. Regarding the acceptability of the proposed activity or activities; and ii. if the opinion is that the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr or Environmental Authorization, and where applicable, the closure plan; (o) a summary and copies of any comments received during any Section 11 consultation process and where applicable all responses thereto; and (p) any other information requested by the competent authority Section 11 Where a government notice gazetted by the Minister provides for any Not applicable protocol or minimum information requirement to be applied to a specialist report, the requirements as indicated in such notice will apply. 2 Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility RELEVANT EXPERTISE Chris van Rooyen Chris has 20 years’ experience in the management of wildlife interactions with electricity infrastructure. He was head of the Eskom-Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) Strategic Partnership from 1996 to 2007, which has received international acclaim as a model of co-operative management between industry and natural resource conservation. He is an acknowledged global expert in this field and has worked in South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Lesotho, New Zealand, Texas, New Mexico and Florida. Chris also has extensive project management experience and has received several management awards from Eskom for his work in the Eskom-Endangered Wildlife Strategic Partnership. He is the author of 15 academic papers (some with co-authors), co-author of two book chapters and several research reports. He has been involved as ornithological consultant in more than 160 power line and 30 renewable energy projects. Chris is also co-author of the Best Practice for Avian Monitoring and Impact Mitigation at Wind Development Sites in Southern Africa, which is currently (2017) accepted as the industry standard. Chris also works outside the electricity industry and had done a wide range of bird impact assessment studies associated with various residential and industrial developments. Albert Froneman (Pr.Sci.Nat) Albert has an M. Sc. in Conservation Biology from the University of Cape Town, and started his career in the natural sciences as a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) specialist at Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). He is a registered Professional Natural Scientist in the field of zoological science with the South African Council of Natural Scientific Professionals (SACNASP). In 1998, he joined the Endangered Wildlife Trust where he headed up the Airports Company South Africa – Endangered Wildlife Strategic Partnership, a position he held until he resigned in 2008 to work as a private ornithological consultant. Albert’s specialist field is the management of wildlife, especially bird related hazards at airports. His expertise is recognized internationally; in 2005 he was elected as Vice Chairman of the International Bird Strike Committee. Since 2010, Albert has worked closely with Chris van Rooyen in developing a protocol for pre-construction monitoring at wind energy facilities, and they are currently jointly coordinating pre-construction monitoring programmes at several wind farm facilities. Albert also works outside the electricity industry and had done a wide range of bird impact assessment studies associated with various residential and industrial developments. Nico Laubscher Nico holds a D.Sc. from the University of Potchefstroom and was head of the Statistics Division, National Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences of the CSIR from 1959 – 1975. He retired in 1989 as head of the Centre for Statistical Consultation at the University of Stellenbosch. Nico held several offices, including President of the South African Statistical Association, and editor of the South African Statistical Journal. Nico has five decades’ experience in statistical analysis and data science applications, including specialisation in model building with massive data sets, designing of experiments for process improvement and analysis of data so obtained, and statistical process control. He also has published peer reviewed papers in several leading statistical journals, including Annals of Mathematical Statistics, American Statistical Journal, Technometrics and The American Statistician. He currently operates as a private statistical consultant to industry and academia. 3 Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It is anticipated that the proposed San Kraal Wind Energy Facility will have a variety of impacts on avifauna which ranges from low to high. The potential impacts include: Collision mortality on the wind turbines; Displacement due to disturbance during construction (and dismantling) of the wind farm and associated infrastructure; Displacement due to habitat change and loss; Electrocution on the internal powerline grid where the lines run above ground; Collision with the proposed power line grid connections and the internal 33kV powerlines where the lines run above ground; and Displacement due to disturbance during the construction (and dismantling) of the power line grid connection. Of the 184 species that could potentially occur at the site, 32 are classified as priority species for wind farm developments (Retief et al. 2012). Displacement of priority species due to disturbance during the construction (and dismantling) phases of the wind energy facility and associated infrastructure is likely to be a temporary, medium negative impact, and will remain at a medium level despite the application of mitigation measures. None of the priority species are likely to be permanently displaced due to disturbance, although partial displacement of terrestrial species e.g. Blue Crane, Secretarybird, Grey-winged Francolin and African Rock Pipit in the short term during the construction phase is very likely. The implementation of buffer zones around the nesting area could reduce this impact for Blue Cranes, but not for the other priority species. The significance will therefore remain at a medium level after mitigation collectively for priority species. Displacement of priority species due to disturbance during construction (and dismantling) phases of the grid connection is likely to be a temporary, medium negative impact, and should be reduced to a low level with the application of mitigation measures. Species most likely to be affected by this impact would be terrestrial species such as Grey-winged Francolin, Blue Crane, Ludwig’s Bustard, Northern Black Korhaan, Secretarybird and Blue Korhaan, but there is also some potential of disturbance for Verreaux’s Eagle. The implementation of the proposed mitigation measures will greatly reduce the probability of disturbance of specifically breeding Verreaux’s Eagles. Displacement of priority species due to habitat destruction during operational
Recommended publications
  • Namibia & the Okavango
    Pel’s Fishing Owl - a pair was found on a wooded island south of Shakawe (Jan-Ake Alvarsson) NAMIBIA & THE OKAVANGO 21 SEPTEMBER – 8 OCTOBER 2017 LEADER: STEVE BRAINE For most of the country the previous three years drought had been broken and although too early for the mi- grants we did however do very well with birding generally. We searched and found all the near endemics as well as the endemic Dune Lark. Besides these we also had a new write-in for the trip! In the floodplains after observing a wonderful Pel’s Fishing Owl we travelled down a side channel of the Okavango River to look for Pygmy Geese, we were lucky and came across several pairs before reaching a dried-out floodplain. Four birds flew out of the reedbeds and looked rather different to the normal weavers of which there were many, a closer look at the two remaining birds revealed a beautiful pair of Cuckoo Finches. These we all enjoyed for a brief period before they followed the other birds which had now disappeared into the reedbeds. Very strong winds on three of the birding days made birding a huge challenge to say the least after not finding the rare and difficult Herero Chat we had to make alternate arrangements at another locality later in the trip. The entire tour from the Hosea Kutako International Airport outside the capital Windhoek and returning there nineteen days later delivered 375 species. Out of these, four birds were seen only by the leader, a further three species were heard but not seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Plan V1.0 Free State Province Technical Report (FSDETEA/BPFS/2016 1.0)
    Biodiversity Plan v1.0 Free State Province Technical Report (FSDETEA/BPFS/2016_1.0) DRAFT 1 JUNE 2016 Map: Collins, N.B. 2015. Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: CBA map. Report Title: Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: Technical Report v1.0 Free State Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs. Internal Report. Date: $20 June 2016 ______________________________ Version: 1.0 Authors & contact details: Nacelle Collins Free State Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs [email protected] 051 4004775 082 4499012 Physical address: 34 Bojonala Buidling Markgraaf street Bloemfontein 9300 Postal address: Private Bag X20801 Bloemfontein 9300 Citation: Report: Collins, N.B. 2016. Free State Province Biodiversity Plan: Technical Report v1.0. Free State Department of Economic, Small Business Development, Tourism and Environmental Affairs. Internal Report. 1. Summary $what is a biodiversity plan This report contains the technical information that details the rationale and methods followed to produce the first terrestrial biodiversity plan for the Free State Province. Because of low confidence in the aquatic data that were available at the time of developing the plan, the aquatic component is not included herein and will be released as a separate report. The biodiversity plan was developed with cognisance of the requirements for the determination of bioregions and the preparation and publication of bioregional plans (DEAT, 2009). To this extent the two main products of this process are: • A map indicating the different terrestrial categories (Protected, Critical Biodiversity Areas, Ecological Support Areas, Other and Degraded) • Land-use guidelines for the above mentioned categories This plan represents the first attempt at collating all terrestrial biodiversity and ecological data into a single system from which it can be interrogated and assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Melodious Lark Inhabits Relatively Dry Grasslands Dominated by Rooigras Themeda Triandra but It Sometimes Also Occurs in Planted Eragrostis Pastures and Fallow Fields
    4 Alaudidae: larks Habitat: The Melodious Lark inhabits relatively dry grasslands dominated by Rooigras Themeda triandra but it sometimes also occurs in planted Eragrostis pastures and fallow fields. Vernon (1983c) pointed out that its habitat is usually at 550– 1750 m, with a mean annual rainfall between 400 and 800 mm. The Melodious Lark generally avoids the hard, wiry grasses of the alpine and sour grass- lands (Vernon 1983c). Reporting rates show that it is most often recorded in grassy Karoo, and sweet and mixed grasslands. Movements: There is no evidence of any regular seasonal movements in this species. The models show fewer sightings in the winter months, but this is probably due to birds being overlooked when not singing. However, the numbers of Melodious Larks in any area may vary from year to year (Tarboton et al. 1987b), implying movements in response to environmental conditions. Breeding: Tarboton et al. (1987b) reported breed- ing November–February in the Transvaal. Breeding occurs in Zimbabwe September–March (Irwin 1981; Masterson & Parks 1993). Historical distribution and conservation: There is evidence that the Melodious Lark was formerly distributed over a larger geographical area in south- ern Africa than it occupies presently (Vernon 1983c; Maclean 1993b). For example, there are no recent records of this species at its type locality at Kuruman (2723AD) in the northern Cape Province, or at Matatiele (3028BD) in KwaZulu-Natal where it was common in the early 1900s. Overgrazing leading to Melodious Lark changes in plant species composition, and crop farming Spotlewerik have transformed the habitat of this lark in many grassland areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps
    Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland
    [Show full text]
  • Common Birds of Namibia and Botswana 1 Josh Engel
    Common Birds of Namibia and Botswana 1 Josh Engel Photos: Josh Engel, [[email protected]] Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History and Tropical Birding Tours [www.tropicalbirding.com] Produced by: Tyana Wachter, R. Foster and J. Philipp, with the support of Connie Keller and the Mellon Foundation. © Science and Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL 60605 USA. [[email protected]] [fieldguides.fieldmuseum.org/guides] Rapid Color Guide #584 version 1 01/2015 1 Struthio camelus 2 Pelecanus onocrotalus 3 Phalacocorax capensis 4 Microcarbo coronatus STRUTHIONIDAE PELECANIDAE PHALACROCORACIDAE PHALACROCORACIDAE Ostrich Great white pelican Cape cormorant Crowned cormorant 5 Anhinga rufa 6 Ardea cinerea 7 Ardea goliath 8 Ardea pupurea ANIHINGIDAE ARDEIDAE ARDEIDAE ARDEIDAE African darter Grey heron Goliath heron Purple heron 9 Butorides striata 10 Scopus umbretta 11 Mycteria ibis 12 Leptoptilos crumentiferus ARDEIDAE SCOPIDAE CICONIIDAE CICONIIDAE Striated heron Hamerkop (nest) Yellow-billed stork Marabou stork 13 Bostrychia hagedash 14 Phoenicopterus roseus & P. minor 15 Phoenicopterus minor 16 Aviceda cuculoides THRESKIORNITHIDAE PHOENICOPTERIDAE PHOENICOPTERIDAE ACCIPITRIDAE Hadada ibis Greater and Lesser Flamingos Lesser Flamingo African cuckoo hawk Common Birds of Namibia and Botswana 2 Josh Engel Photos: Josh Engel, [[email protected]] Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History and Tropical Birding Tours [www.tropicalbirding.com] Produced by: Tyana Wachter, R. Foster and J. Philipp,
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia & Botswana 2017
    Namibia & Botswana 2017 A Tropical Birding Custom Trip 3-18 September 2017 Guides: Ken Behrens & Charley Hesse September 3-18, 2017 Guided by: Ken Behrens Charley Hesse Photos and Report by Ken Behrens www.tropicalbirding.com The Crimson-breasted Gonolek is Namibia’s national bird. WINDHOEK After arrival in Namibia’s capital, we had a day to relax and enjoy the excellent birding on offer around this small and charming city. Windhoek has a population of about 300,000, out of Namibia’s tiny population of only 2.1 million, remarkable for a country that is twice the size of California. Monteiro’s Hornbill (left), one of many Namibian near-endemic birds that we were seeking. On our morning walk at Avis Dam, we enjoyed Barred Wren-Warbler (top left) and Black-fronted or African Red-eyed Bulbul (bottom left), while there were a bounty of waterbirds at the Gammons Water Care (Sewage!) Works, including Red-knobbed Coot (middle left) and African Darter (right). From Windhoek, in the central mountains, we descended into the Namib Desert, where species like the Common Ostrich survive despite incredibly harsh conditions. Creatures of the Namib: South African Ground Squirrel (bottom right); Tractrac Chat (top right); and Rueppell’s Bustard (left). WALVIS BAY AND SWAKOPMUND The Namib dune fields hold Namibia’s sole political endemic bird, the Dune Lark. Walvis Bay itself is a mecca for waterbirds, including thousands of Lesser Flamingos (right-hand page). Spitzkoppe is Namibia’s most distinctive and iconic mountain. Our avian target at Spitzkoppe was the charismatic and scarce Herero Chat.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia & Botswana
    Namibia & Botswana: From the NAMIB to the OKAVANGO A Tropical Birding Set Departure September 5–20, 2015 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken by Ken Behrens during this trip TOUR SUMMARY Our Namibia and northern Botswana tour has long been one of our most popular, and for good reason. The Namib escarpment and desert hold a suite of endemic birds that is shared only with adjacent Angola. These include the handsome Hartlaub’s Francolin, taxonomic oddity Rockrunner, boldly pied White-tailed Shrike, and cryptic Dune Lark. Farther north and east, the Okavango system holds a great wealth of birds, including two of the continent’s most wanted species: White-backed Night-Heron and Pel’s Fishing-Owl. There is no better spot in Africa for these scarce and shy birds. Although they expect the special birds, birders are often also surprised by this tour’s richness of mammals. Etosha National Park is one of Africa’s great parks, and is at its best during the late dry season timing of this tour. The spectacle of thousands of big mammals crowding together for precious mouthfuls of water while trying to avoid the big predators that await in ambush, ranks among Earth’s great natural spectacles. And Etosha is just one of several sites on this trip that always have lots of mammals. But the real thing that makes tours in Namibia and Botswana special is not the specific birds and mammals that these countries hold, Namibia & Botswana September 5 – 20, 2015 but rather a magical quality to the landscapes of this part of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy's Impacts on Birds in South Africa
    OCCASIONAL REPORT SERIES: 2 Wind energy’s impacts on birds in South Africa: A preliminary review of the results of operational monitoring at the first wind farms of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme in South Africa 1 • BIRDLIFE SOUTH AFRICA OCCASIONAL REPORT SERIES BirdLife South Africa, Private Bag X5000, Parklands, 2121, South Africa Website: www.birdlife.org.za • E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +27 11 789 1122 • Fax: +27 11 789 5188 Recommended citation: Ralston Paton, S., Smallie J., Pearson A., and Ramalho R. 2017. Wind energy’s impacts on birds in South Africa: A preliminary review of the results of operational monitoring at the first wind farms of the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme in South Africa. BirdLife South Africa Occasional Report Series No. 2. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa Copyright: © 2017 BirdLife South Africa The intellectual property rights of this publication belong to BirdLife South Africa. All rights reserved. Copyright for the images remains with the indi- vidual photographers. Author: Samantha Ralston-Paton (BirdLife South Africa)1, Jon Smallie (WildSkies Ecological Services), Andrew Pearson (Arcus Consult- ing), and Ricardo Ramalho (Biosinight). 1 Corresponding author, email: [email protected]. Design: Bryony van Wyk Acknowledgements: This document was peer reviewed by the Birds and Renewable Energy Specialist Group (Andrew Jenkins, Andrew Pearson, Alvaro Camiña, Birgit Erni, Chris van Rooyen, Craig Whittington-Jones, David Allan, Hanneline Smit-Robinson, Jon Smallie, Kevin Shaw, Lourens Leeuwner, Michael Brooks, Phoebe Barnard, Peter Ryan, Theoni Photo- poulou and Vonica Perold). The input and advice of this group is greatly valued and appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe PDF, Job 6
    Noms français des oiseaux du Monde par la Commission internationale des noms français des oiseaux (CINFO) composée de Pierre DEVILLERS, Henri OUELLET, Édouard BENITO-ESPINAL, Roseline BEUDELS, Roger CRUON, Normand DAVID, Christian ÉRARD, Michel GOSSELIN, Gilles SEUTIN Éd. MultiMondes Inc., Sainte-Foy, Québec & Éd. Chabaud, Bayonne, France, 1993, 1re éd. ISBN 2-87749035-1 & avec le concours de Stéphane POPINET pour les noms anglais, d'après Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World par C. G. SIBLEY & B. L. MONROE Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1990 ISBN 2-87749035-1 Source : http://perso.club-internet.fr/alfosse/cinfo.htm Nouvelle adresse : http://listoiseauxmonde.multimania.
    [Show full text]
  • Clocolan – Ficksburg 88Kv Power Line
    CLOCOLAN – FICKSBURG 88KV POWER LINE BASIC ASSESSMENT AVIFAUNAL SPECIALIST STUDY April 2013 Prepared by: Prepared for: WildSkies Ecological Services ACER (Africa) Jon Smallie Percy Langa [email protected] [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eskom Holdings SOC Limited (hereinafter referred to as Eskom) is proposing to construct a new 88kV overhead power line from the Clocolan Distribution substation (Clocolan), to the Ficksburg Municipal substation (Ficksburg) in the Free State Province (Eskom Distribution’s Free State Operating Unit). This project will result in the construction of a radial feed which will ensure a secure supply should one of the power lines experience a fault. In bird terms, a fairly wide diversity of species could be found on this site (278 species recorded by South African Bird Atlas Project 1 and 2 data). Of these, 18 species are Red List species i.e. those species for which there is most conservation concern. Of these species the most relevant for this study are: Blue Crane, Grey- crowned Crane, Cape Vulture, and Melodious Lark. The likely impacts of the proposed power line on birds are as follows: Collision of species such as Blue Crane, Grey-crowned Crane and various other species is likely to be of high negative significance and will require mitigation in order to reduce it to low significance. In order to identify the high risk sections of power line requiring mitigation, it is essential that once the exact route is finalized and individual pole positions surveyed and pegged, an avifaunal walk-through be conducted. This walk through will also identify any sensitive breeding species that may require special attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird-Friendly Burning and Grazing Best-Practice for Grasslands
    Bird-friendly burning and grazing best-practice for grasslands Achieving bird conservation and economic grazing objectives together in South Africa’s grasslands Dr Charmaine Uys, Dr Hanneline Smit-Robinson and Mr Daniel Marnewick BirdLife South Africa Version 1 (May 2013) Contents 1. BirdLife Suth Africa as a stakeholder in the Grassland Biome ......................................................... 2 2. Purpose and context......................................................................................................................... 2 3. Grassland bird diversity – significance and benefits ........................................................................ 3 3.1. Birds as environmental indicators ............................................................................................. 4 3.2. Ecosystem services provided by grassland birds ....................................................................... 4 4. Threats to grassland birds ................................................................................................................ 4 5. Burning and grazing recommendations for bird conservation ........................................................ 5 5.1. Burning ...................................................................................................................................... 6 5.2. Grazing ....................................................................................................................................... 7 5.3. Rest ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Observations
    Biodiversity Observations http://bo.adu.org.za An electronic journal published by the Animal Demography Unit at the University of Cape Town The scope of Biodiversity Observations consists of papers describing observations about biodiversity in general, including animals, plants, algae and fungi. This includes observations of behaviour, breeding and flowering patterns, distributions and range extensions, foraging, food, movement, measurements, habitat and colouration/plumage variations. Biotic interactions such as pollination, fruit dispersal, herbivory and predation fall within the scope, as well as the use of indigenous and exotic species by humans. Observations of naturalised plants and animals will also be considered. Biodiversity Observations will also publish a variety of other interesting or relevant biodiversity material: reports of projects and conferences, annotated checklists for a site or region, specialist bibliographies, book reviews and any other appropriate material. Further details and guidelines to authors are on this website. Lead Editor: Arnold van der Westhuizen – Paper Editor: Les G Underhill CHECKLIST AND ANALYSIS OF THE BIRDS OF NAMIBIA AS AT 31 JANUARY 2016 CJ Brown, JM Mendelsohn, N Thomson & M Boorman Recommended citation format: Brown CJ, Mendelsohn JM, Thomson N, Boorman M 2017. Checklist and analysis of the birds of Namibia as at 31 January 2016. Biodiversity Observations 8.20: 1–153 URL: http://bo.adu.org.za/content.php?id=315 Published online: 22 April 2017 – ISSN 2219-0341 – Biodiversity Observations 8.20:
    [Show full text]