Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility AVIFAUNAL SPECIALIST STUDY Proposed San Kraal Wind Energy Facility near Noupoort, Northern Cape Compiled September 2017 Prepared by: Chris van Rooyen Consulting Prepared for: ARCUS 1 Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility CONTENTS OF THE SPECIALIST REPORT – CHECKLIST Regulation GNR 326 of 4 December 2014, as amended 7 April 2017, Section of Report Appendix 6 (a) details of the specialist who prepared the report; and the expertise of Front pg. 3 that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be Back pg. 112 specified by the competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report Section 2 was prepared; (cA) an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the Sections 3 and 4 specialist report; (cB) a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of Sections 6, 9, 10, the proposed development and levels of acceptable change; (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the Section 7 and Appendix 2 relevance of the season to the outcome of the assessment; (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or Sections 3, 4, 7 and 9 carrying out the specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site Section 13. No site plan related to the proposed activity or activities and its associated structures alternative was provided and infrastructure, inclusive of a site plan identifying site alternatives; (g) an identification of any areas to be avoided, including buffers; Section 13 (h) a map superimposing the activity including the associated structures Section 13 and infrastructure on the environmental sensitivities of the site including areas to be avoided, including buffers; (i) a description of any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps Section 4 in knowledge; (j) a description of the findings and potential implications of such findings Section 12 on the impact of the proposed activity, including identified alternatives on the environment, or activities; (k) any mitigation measures for inclusion in the EMPr; Section 9 (l) any conditions for inclusion in the environmental authorisation; Section 9 (m) any monitoring requirements for inclusion in the EMPr or Section 9 environmental authorisation; (n) a reasoned opinion— Section 9 and 12 i. as to whether the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised; iA. Regarding the acceptability of the proposed activity or activities; and ii. if the opinion is that the proposed activity, activities or portions thereof should be authorised, any avoidance, management and mitigation measures that should be included in the EMPr or Environmental Authorization, and where applicable, the closure plan; (o) a summary and copies of any comments received during any Section 11 consultation process and where applicable all responses thereto; and (p) any other information requested by the competent authority Section 11 Where a government notice gazetted by the Minister provides for any Not applicable protocol or minimum information requirement to be applied to a specialist report, the requirements as indicated in such notice will apply. 2 Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility RELEVANT EXPERTISE Chris van Rooyen Chris has 20 years’ experience in the management of wildlife interactions with electricity infrastructure. He was head of the Eskom-Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) Strategic Partnership from 1996 to 2007, which has received international acclaim as a model of co-operative management between industry and natural resource conservation. He is an acknowledged global expert in this field and has worked in South Africa, Namibia, Botswana, Lesotho, New Zealand, Texas, New Mexico and Florida. Chris also has extensive project management experience and has received several management awards from Eskom for his work in the Eskom-Endangered Wildlife Strategic Partnership. He is the author of 15 academic papers (some with co-authors), co-author of two book chapters and several research reports. He has been involved as ornithological consultant in more than 160 power line and 30 renewable energy projects. Chris is also co-author of the Best Practice for Avian Monitoring and Impact Mitigation at Wind Development Sites in Southern Africa, which is currently (2017) accepted as the industry standard. Chris also works outside the electricity industry and had done a wide range of bird impact assessment studies associated with various residential and industrial developments. Albert Froneman (Pr.Sci.Nat) Albert has an M. Sc. in Conservation Biology from the University of Cape Town, and started his career in the natural sciences as a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) specialist at Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). He is a registered Professional Natural Scientist in the field of zoological science with the South African Council of Natural Scientific Professionals (SACNASP). In 1998, he joined the Endangered Wildlife Trust where he headed up the Airports Company South Africa – Endangered Wildlife Strategic Partnership, a position he held until he resigned in 2008 to work as a private ornithological consultant. Albert’s specialist field is the management of wildlife, especially bird related hazards at airports. His expertise is recognized internationally; in 2005 he was elected as Vice Chairman of the International Bird Strike Committee. Since 2010, Albert has worked closely with Chris van Rooyen in developing a protocol for pre-construction monitoring at wind energy facilities, and they are currently jointly coordinating pre-construction monitoring programmes at several wind farm facilities. Albert also works outside the electricity industry and had done a wide range of bird impact assessment studies associated with various residential and industrial developments. Nico Laubscher Nico holds a D.Sc. from the University of Potchefstroom and was head of the Statistics Division, National Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences of the CSIR from 1959 – 1975. He retired in 1989 as head of the Centre for Statistical Consultation at the University of Stellenbosch. Nico held several offices, including President of the South African Statistical Association, and editor of the South African Statistical Journal. Nico has five decades’ experience in statistical analysis and data science applications, including specialisation in model building with massive data sets, designing of experiments for process improvement and analysis of data so obtained, and statistical process control. He also has published peer reviewed papers in several leading statistical journals, including Annals of Mathematical Statistics, American Statistical Journal, Technometrics and The American Statistician. He currently operates as a private statistical consultant to industry and academia. 3 Bird Specialist Study: San Kraal Wind Energy Facility EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It is anticipated that the proposed San Kraal Wind Energy Facility will have a variety of impacts on avifauna which ranges from low to high. The potential impacts include: Collision mortality on the wind turbines; Displacement due to disturbance during construction (and dismantling) of the wind farm and associated infrastructure; Displacement due to habitat change and loss; Electrocution on the internal powerline grid where the lines run above ground; Collision with the proposed power line grid connections and the internal 33kV powerlines where the lines run above ground; and Displacement due to disturbance during the construction (and dismantling) of the power line grid connection. Of the 184 species that could potentially occur at the site, 32 are classified as priority species for wind farm developments (Retief et al. 2012). Displacement of priority species due to disturbance during the construction (and dismantling) phases of the wind energy facility and associated infrastructure is likely to be a temporary, medium negative impact, and will remain at a medium level despite the application of mitigation measures. None of the priority species are likely to be permanently displaced due to disturbance, although partial displacement of terrestrial species e.g. Blue Crane, Secretarybird, Grey-winged Francolin and African Rock Pipit in the short term during the construction phase is very likely. The implementation of buffer zones around the nesting area could reduce this impact for Blue Cranes, but not for the other priority species. The significance will therefore remain at a medium level after mitigation collectively for priority species. Displacement of priority species due to disturbance during construction (and dismantling) phases of the grid connection is likely to be a temporary, medium negative impact, and should be reduced to a low level with the application of mitigation measures. Species most likely to be affected by this impact would be terrestrial species such as Grey-winged Francolin, Blue Crane, Ludwig’s Bustard, Northern Black Korhaan, Secretarybird and Blue Korhaan, but there is also some potential of disturbance for Verreaux’s Eagle. The implementation of the proposed mitigation measures will greatly reduce the probability of disturbance of specifically breeding Verreaux’s Eagles. Displacement of priority species due to habitat destruction during operational