Crystal Chemical Variations in Li- and Fe-Rich Micas from Pikes Peak Batholith (Central Colorado)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crystal Chemical Variations in Li- and Fe-Rich Micas from Pikes Peak Batholith (Central Colorado) American Mineralogist, Volume 85, pages 1275–1286, 2000 Crystal chemical variations in Li- and Fe-rich micas from Pikes Peak batholith (central Colorado) MARIA FRANCA BRIGATTI,*,1 CRISTINA LUGLI,1 LUCIANO POPPI,1 EUGENE E. FOORD,† AND DANIEL E. KILE2 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy 2United States Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The crystal structure and M-site populations of a series of micas-1M from miarolitic pegmatites that formed within host granitic rocks of the Precambrian, anorogenic Pikes Peak batholith, central Colorado, were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. Crystals fall in the polylithionite- [6] siderophyllite-annite field, being 0 ≤ Li ≤ 2.82, 0.90 ≤ Fetotal ≤ 5.00, 0.26 ≤ Al ≤ 2.23 apfu. Ordering of trivalent cations (mainly Al3+) is revealed in a cis-octahedral site (M2 or M3), which leads to a lowering of the layer symmetry from C12/m(1) (siderophyllite and annite crystals) to C12(1) diperiodic group (lithian siderophyllite and ferroan polylithionite crystals). On the basis of mean bond length, the ordering scheme of octahedral cations is mostly meso-octahedral, whereas the mean electron count at each M site suggests both meso- and hetero-octahedral ordering, the calculated mean atomic numbers being M1 = M3 ≠ M2, M2 = M3 ≠ M1 and M1 ≠ M2 ≠ M3. As the siderophyllite content increases, so do the a, b, and c unit-cell parameters, as well as the refractive indices, primarily nβ. The tetrahedral rotation angle, α, is generally small (1.51 ≤ α ≤ 5.04°) and roughly increases with polylithionite content, whereas the basal oxygen out-of-plane tilting, ∆z, is sensitive both to octahe- dral composition and degree of order (0.0 ≤ ∆z ≤ 0.009 Å for siderophyllite and annite, 0.058 ≤ ∆z ≤ 0.144 Å for lithian siderophyllite and ferroan polylithionite crystals). INTRODUCTION (1993), and Rieder et al. (1996). An interesting feature of these This study concerns the crystal chemistry of trioctahedral trioctahedral micas is the octahedral ordering pattern. The ideal micas from pegmatites associated with granitic units of the layer symmetry reduces from C2/m to C2 space group, more anorogenic Pikes Peak batholith (PPB), central Colorado. The precisely, referring to diperiodic groups, from C12/m(1) to PPB is a result of a complex magmatic history of crystalliza- C12(1) (Dornberger-Schiff et al. 1982), as the result of a dif- tion and crustal assimilation, beginning with a mantle-derived ferent cation ordering in cis-octahedral sites. basaltic magma and culminating with the miarolitic cavity stage Depending on the cation distribution of octahedral sites, ˇ of pegmatite evolution that represents the final product of crys- Durovicˇ (1994) subdivided micas in: (1) homo-octahedral (all tallization (Simmons et al. 1987; Wobus and Hutchinson 1988; three octahedral sites are occupied by the same kind of ions), Cˇern´y, 1991; Foord et al. 1995; Kile and Foord 1998). Micas (2) meso-octahedral (one site is occupied by a cation different widely vary in composition, from annite in the host granite from that in the other two sites), (3) hetero-octahedral (each of through siderophyllite and ferroan phlogopite in graphic the three sites is differently occupied). The location of the ori- pegmatites, and finally to lithian siderophyllite and ferroan gin of the octahedral sheet corresponds: (1) to the M1 site for polylithionite in miarolitic cavities (Foord et al. 1995; Kile and homo-octahedral micas, (2) to the site with different occupa- Foord 1998). In miarolitic pegmatites, micas, which are fre- tion for meso-octahedral micas, and (3) to the site with the ˇ quently Li- and Fe-enriched, have been used as markers of lowest electron density in hetero-octahedral micas (Durovicˇ et chemical fractionation and as petrogenetic indicators, as well al. 1984). Consequently, two kinds of layers exist (Zvyagin 1997; Nespolo et al. 1999): the M1 layer has an origin of the as for characterizing relative HF, HCl, O2, and H2O fugacities in fluids (Foord et al. 1995; Kile and Foord 1998). Therefore, octahedral sheet in M1 site, whereas the M2 layer originates in the knowledge of crystal structure and chemistry, as well as of either M2 or M3 site. The M1 layer is far more common. Meso- octahedral cation partitioning, can further our understanding trioctahedral crystals along the trilithionite-polylithionite join, of pegmatite evolution and conditions of crystallization. solved in the space group C2/m for 1M [Takeda and Burnham The crystal structure of micas in the siderophyllite- 1969, Guggenheim 1981 (lepidolite-1M from Radkovice)] and polylithionite join was studied, for example, by Takeda et al. C2/c for 2M1 (Swanson and Bailey 1981) or 2M2 polytypes (1971), Sartori et al. (1973), Sartori (1976, 1977), Guggenheim [Guggenheim 1981 (lepidolite-2M2 from Radkovice)], suggest and Bailey (1977), Brown (1978), Guggenheim (1981), the presence of M1 layers. Hetero-trioctahedral Li-rich micas- Swanson and Bailey (1981), Backhaus (1983), Weiss et al. 1M (zinnwaldite-1M) refined by Guggenheim and Bailey (1977) and by Backhaus (1983) (lepidolite-1M) in C2 subgroup were built up of M2 layers and M1 layers, respectively. Furthermore, *E-mail: [email protected] the refinement of a 2M1 polytype (zinnwaldite-2M1), in the space †Deceased on January 8, 1998. group Cc (Rieder et al. 1996) indicates an octahedral cation 0003-004X/00/0009–1275$05.00 1275 1276 BRIGATTI ET AL.: CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF Li- AND Fe-RICH MICAS ordering similar to that reported by Guggenheim and Bailey (OH)– was measured by thermogravimetric analysis in Ar gas – (1977) for 1M polytype. flow to minimize the reaction 2FeO + 2(OH) → Fe2O3 + H2 + However, data are lacking on changes in geometrical and O2–, using a Seiko SSC 5200 thermal analyzer (heating rate 10 ordering parameters induced by variation in composition and °C/min and flow rate 200 mL/min). The determination based degree of order for crystals in the K-Li-Fe-Al-Si trioctahedral on the weight loss observed in the temperature range 500–1100 mica system. °C was adjusted for the F content. The Fe2+ amount (estimated Here, we attempt to (1) characterize the crystal structure of measure standard deviation σ < 4%) was estimated by a semi- 17 mica-1M crystals in the K-Li-Fe-Al-Si trioctahedral mica micro-volumetric method (Meyrowitz 1970). The chemical composition plane; (2) clarify the mechanisms of Li incorpo- formulae were based on O24–x–y(OH)xFy. Chemical composition ration in the layer; (3) identify the ordering pattern of the octa- (Table 2) was determined by combining the microprobe results hedral sites. with structure refinement (for Li, OH, and Fe2+). Optical data (Table 3) were determined using a conventional EXPERIMENTAL METHODS petrographic microscope and calibrated immersion oils. Two of the refractive indices, nβ and nγ, were determined by grain Samples mount on an approximately centered Bxa figure; nα was deter- The mica crystals (Table 1) represent the binary joins mined using spindle stage methods to attain proper orientation siderophyllite-polylithionite and annite-siderophyllite. All crys- of the X vibration direction. Determination of the refractive tals are from the shallow-seated to subvolcanic pegmatites of indices for lighter-colored micas was relatively straightforward, Precambrian Pikes Peak batholith, located in the southern Front and the error is given as ±0.002, whereas determination of the Range of Colorado, west of Colorado Springs and south and indices of the darker and more pleochroic samples, i.e., those southwest of Denver (Foord et al. 1995; Unruh et al. 1995; having indices above approximately 1.650, have errors of Kile and Foord 1998). The pegmatites in the southern part of ±0.004. The optic axial angle was determined by Mallard’s the batholith host miarolitic cavities where micas were often method, using an ocular micrometer. The 2VX was calculated associated with amazonite, smoky quartz, goethite, topaz, and (D = KnβsinV). For further details see Kile and Foord (1998). fluorite (Foord et al. 1995). X-ray single-crystal diffraction Chemical and optical determination Crystals were examined by the precession method, and those Significant compositional and distinct, sharp color zoning, belonging to 1M polytype were selected for cell dimensions resulting from primary growth fluctuations, are present in some and intensity data. In general, crystal quality was good, but in mica crystals formed in miarolitic cavities (samples 140, 177, some cases [310] twinning, 1Md sequences and different 54, 55, 114). Therefore, the crystals were initially examined by polytypes (mostly 3T) were found. scanning electron microscope (Philips SEM XL-40 with an X-ray diffraction data were collected on a Siemens auto- EDAX energy dispersive detector) by backscattered-electron mated four-circle diffractometer with rotating anode (graph- imaging and X-ray maps to distinguish homogeneous portions. ite-monochromated MoKα radiation of λ = 0.71073 Å at 52 Electron microprobe analyses were performed using a wave- kV and 140 mA operating conditions) using X-SCAN software length-dispersive ARL-SEMQ microprobe (operating condi- (Siemens 1996). Reflection intensities (+h, ±k, ±l) were col- tions: 15 kV accelerating voltage, 15 nA sample current, and lected using the ω scan mode (scan window 2.2–3.8°) and cor- defocused electron beam of about 3 µm spot size). The F con- rected for Lorentz-polarization effects and for absorption using tent was determined by the method reported by Foley (1989). a complete ψ scan (0–360° at 10° intervals in ϕ) with more Analyses and data reduction were done using the PROBE soft- than five uniformly distributed reflections with regard to 2θ (χ ware package (Donovan 1995). Li content was determined by > 80°). The unit-cell parameters were determined from the set- Emission Spectrometry Plasma (ICP, Varian Liberty 200). Then ting angles of more than 50 reflections in the range 15 ≤ 2θ ≤ 25 mg of each sample were digested with a mixture of HF (38%) 30°.
Recommended publications
  • An Evolutionary System of Mineralogy: Proposal for a Classification Of
    1 1 02 November 2018—American Mineralogist—Revision 1 2 3 4 An evolutionary system of mineralogy: Proposal for a classification 5 of planetary materials based on natural kind clustering 6 7 ROBERT M. HAZEN1,* 8 1Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, 9 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015, U. S. A. 10 11 ABSTRACT 12 Minerals reveal the nature of the co-evolving geosphere and biosphere through billions of years 13 of Earth history. Mineral classification systems have the potential to elucidate this rich 14 evolutionary story; however, the present mineral taxonomy, based as it is on idealized major 15 element chemistry and crystal structure, lacks a temporal aspect and thus cannot reflect planetary 16 evolution. A complementary evolutionary system of mineralogy based on the quantitative 17 recognition of “natural kind clustering” for a wide range of condensed planetary materials with 18 different paragenetic origins has the potential to amplify, though not supersede, the present 19 classification system. 20 21 _________________________________ 22 *E-mail: [email protected] 23 Keywords: philosophy of mineralogy; classification; mineral evolution; mineral ecology; data- 24 driven discovery; cluster analysis; natural kinds 2 25 INTRODUCTION 26 For more than 2000 years, the classification of natural objects and phenomena into “kinds” has 27 been a central pursuit of natural philosophers (Aristotle/Thompson 1910; Locke 1690; Linnaeus 28 1758). The modern mineral classification system, rooted in the chemical framework of James 29 Dwight Dana (1850), is based on unique combinations of idealized major element composition 30 and crystal structure (Strunz 1941; Palache et al. 1944, 1951; Liebau 1985; Mills et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Analysis of Mineralogical Systems
    American Mineralogist, Volume 102, pages 1588–1596, 2017 OUTLooKS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY MATERIALS k Network analysis of mineralogical systems SHAUNNA M. MORRISON1, CHAO LIU1, AHmeD ELEISH1,2, ANIRUDH PRABHU2, CONGRUI LI2, JOLYON RALPH3, ROBERT T. DOWNS4, JOSHUA J. GOLDEN4, PETER FOX2, DANIEL R. HUmmeR1,5, MICHAEL B. MEYER1, AND ROBERT M. HAZEN1,* 1Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution for Science, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A. 2Tetherless World Constellation, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, U.S.A. 3Mindat.org, 128 Mullards Close, Mitcham, Surrey, CR4 4FD, U.K. 4Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A. 5Department of Geology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, U.S.A. ABSTRACT A fundamental goal of mineralogy and petrology is the deep understanding of mineral phase relation- ships and the consequent spatial and temporal patterns of mineral coexistence in rocks, ore bodies, sediments, meteorites, and other natural polycrystalline materials. The multi-dimensional chemical com- plexity of such mineral assemblages has traditionally led to experimental and theoretical consideration of 2-, 3-, or n-component systems that represent simplified approximations of natural systems. Network analysis provides a dynamic, quantitative, and predictive visualization framework for employing “big data” to explore complex and otherwise hidden higher-dimensional patterns of diversity and distribution in such mineral systems. We introduce and explore applications of mineral network analysis, in which mineral species are represented by nodes, while coexistence of minerals is indicated by lines between nodes. This approach provides a dynamic visualization platform for higher-dimensional analysis of phase relationships, because topologies of equilibrium phase assemblages and pathways of mineral reaction series are embedded within the networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Persson Mines 0052N 11296.Pdf
    THE GEOCHEMICAL AND MINERALOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MOUNT ROSA COMPLEX, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO, USA by Philip Persson A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date ________________ Signed: ________________________ Philip Persson Signed: ________________________ Dr. Katharina Pfaff Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ________________ Signed: ________________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Professor and Interim Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The ~1.08 Ga Pikes Peak Batholith is a type example of an anorogenic (A)-type granite and hosts numerous late-stage sodic and potassic plutons, including the peraluminous to peralkaline Mount Rosa Complex (MRC), located ~15 km west of the City of Colorado Springs in Central Colorado. The MRC is composed of Pikes Peak biotite granite, fayalite-bearing quartz syenite, granitic dikes, Mount Rosa Na-Fe amphibole granite, mafic dikes ranging from diabase to diorite, and numerous rare earth (REE) and other high field strength element (HFSE; e.g. Th, Zr, Nb) rich Niobium-Yttrrium-Fluorine (NYF)-type pegmatites. The aim of this study is to trace the magmatic evolution of the Mount Rosa Complex in order to understand the relationship between peraluminous and peralkaline rock units and concomitant HFSE enrichment and mineralization processes. Field work, petrography, SEM-based methods, whole rock geochemistry, and electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA) of micas was performed on all rock units to determine their textural, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics. Early peraluminous units such as the Pikes Peak biotite granite and fayalite-bearing quartz syenite contain annite-siderophyllite micas with high Fe/(Fe + Mg) ratios, and show relatively minor enrichments in REE and other HFSE compared to primitive mantle.
    [Show full text]
  • Minor- and Trace-Element Composition of Trioctahedral Micas: a Review
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249851431 Minor- and trace-element composition of trioctahedral micas: A review Article in Mineralogical Magazine · April 2001 DOI: 10.1180/002646101550244 CITATIONS READS 100 1,145 3 authors, including: H.-J. Förster Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam - Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ 297 PUBLICATIONS 6,380 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Special Issue of journal Minerals on Accessory Minerals in Silicic Igneous Rocks View project Geochemistry of late-Variscan granites of the Erzgebirge-Vogtland metallogenic province View project All content following this page was uploaded by H.-J. Förster on 06 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Mineralogical Magazine, April 2001, Vol. 65(2), pp. 249–276 Minor- and trace-element composition of trioctahedral micas: a review 1 2, 2 G. TISCHENDORF , H.-J. FO¨ RSTER * AND B. GOTTESMANN Bautzner Str. 16, 02763 Zittau, Germany GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany ABSTRACT More than 19,000 analytical data mainly from the literature were used to study statistically the distribution patterns of F and the oxides of minor and trace elements (Ti, Sn, Sc, V, Cr, Ga, Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, Sr, Ba, Rb, Cs) in trioctahedral micas of the system phlogopite-annite/siderophyllite- polylithionite (PASP), which is divided here into seven varieties, whose compositional ranges are defined by the parameter mgli (= octahedral Mg minus Li). Plots of trace-element contents vs. mgli reveal that the elements form distinct groups according to the configuration of their distribution patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • GCE2 Database Information
    GCE2: TCS Geochemical/Environmental Database Database name (acronym): TCS Geochemical/Environmental Database (GCE) Database owner: Thermo-Calc Software AB Database version: 2.4 GCE2 is a database containing about 600 minerals. It is used in applications such as geochemistry, geophysics, hydro-metallurgy, aqueous chemistry and environmental chemistry. Included Elements (46) Ag Al Ar As Au B Ba Be Br C Ca Cd Cl Co Cr Cs Cu F Fe Ga Gd H Hg I K Li Mg Mn Mo N Na Ni O P Pb Rb S Se Si Sn Sr Ti U V W Zn Included Phases GCE2 contains critically assessed temperature-, pressure- and composition-dependent data for minerals (silicates, oxides, hydroxides, halides, carbonates, sulfides, sulfates, nitrates, phosphates, etc.). The Birch- Murnaghan model for the pressure dependence of EOS is used. The applicable temperatures range from 298.15 K to about 6000 K and pressures from 1 bar to 1000 kbar (100 GPa). The compounds are treated as either stoichiometric or solution phases. A metallic liquid solution phase is included, but currently there is no data for melt mixture phases with e.g., oxide/silicate/carbonate/sulfide/sulphate/... species (of neutral or charged forms). GCE2 List of Phases GCE2 is compatible with almost all other thermodynamic databases available from Thermo-Calc. Especially, when combined with the AQS database, GCE can be applied to investigate complex heterogeneous interactions among minerals, aqueous solutions and sub-critical H2O over a wide temperature - pressure - composition range. Assessed Systems All phases have been critically assessed and treated by appropriate thermodynamic models. www.thermocalc.com GCE2: TCS Geochemical/Environmental Database ǀ 2 of 27 Limits As in the spirit of the CALPHAD method, predictions can be made for multicomponent systems by extrapolation into multicomponent space of data critically evaluated and assessed based on binary, ternary and in some cases higher order systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the Mica Group; Single Crystal Data on Phlogopites, Biotites and Manganophyllites A
    STUDIES IN THE MICA GROUP; SINGLE CRYSTAL DATA ON PHLOGOPITES, BIOTITES AND MANGANOPHYLLITES A. A. LBvTNSoNAND E. Wu. Horwucu, Department oJ Mineralogy, The Ohio State [Inioersity, Columbus, Ohio, and. Department of Minerology, Uni.aersityoJ Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigon. AssrnA.ct Weissenberg studies of about 250 specimens of phlogopite, biotite and manganophyllite, of which 63 have been chemically analyzed, indicate: (1) in phlogopites there is no dis- cernible relationship between structure and either composition or paragenesis; (2) in biotites there is no relationship between structure and composition, but geologic environ- ment may be a factor in determining the polymorphic type; (3) the optic plane of all 2-layer polymorphs is normal to (010), as is also the case for the biotite variety, anomitel and (4) lJayer polymorphs nearly always have the optic plane parallel with (010), which corresponds with the orientation of the biotite variety, meroxene. IxrnooucuoN Systematic variations between composition and the various poly- morphs in the muscovite-lepidolite series have been demonstrated by Levinson (1953). On the basis of these results it seemeddesirable to investigate the biotite-phlogopite seriesin a similar manner in the hope of gaining insight into causes of the complex polymorphism known to exist in these micas. The only other Weissenbergstudy of these micas known to the writers is in the work of Hendricks and Jefferson (1939), predominantly on unanalyzed specimens. We have obtained over 60 analyzed specimensof biotite, phlogopite and manganophyllite (which we consider as manganoan phlogopite), most of which have been describedby several investigators. In addition we have studied a suite of approximately 200 unanalyzed biotites and phlogopites from geologically well-studied occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Specific Gravity Index for Minerats
    A SPECIFICGRAVITY INDEX FOR MINERATS c. A. MURSKyI ern R. M. THOMPSON, Un'fuersityof Bri.ti,sh Col,umb,in,Voncouver, Canad,a This work was undertaken in order to provide a practical, and as far as possible,a complete list of specific gravities of minerals. An accurate speciflc cravity determination can usually be made quickly and this information when combined with other physical properties commonly leads to rapid mineral identification. Early complete but now outdated specific gravity lists are those of Miers given in his mineralogy textbook (1902),and Spencer(M,i,n. Mag.,2!, pp. 382-865,I}ZZ). A more recent list by Hurlbut (Dana's Manuatr of M,i,neral,ogy,LgE2) is incomplete and others are limited to rock forming minerals,Trdger (Tabel,l,enntr-optischen Best'i,mmungd,er geste,i,nsb.ildend,en M,ineral,e, 1952) and Morey (Encycto- ped,iaof Cherni,cal,Technol,ogy, Vol. 12, 19b4). In his mineral identification tables, smith (rd,entifi,cati,onand. qual,itatioe cherai,cal,anal,ys'i,s of mineral,s,second edition, New york, 19bB) groups minerals on the basis of specificgravity but in each of the twelve groups the minerals are listed in order of decreasinghardness. The present work should not be regarded as an index of all known minerals as the specificgravities of many minerals are unknown or known only approximately and are omitted from the current list. The list, in order of increasing specific gravity, includes all minerals without regard to other physical properties or to chemical composition. The designation I or II after the name indicates that the mineral falls in the classesof minerals describedin Dana Systemof M'ineralogyEdition 7, volume I (Native elements, sulphides, oxides, etc.) or II (Halides, carbonates, etc.) (L944 and 1951).
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy and Mineral Chemistry of Rare-Metal Pegmatites at Abu Rusheid Granitic Gneisses, South Eastern Desert, Egypt
    GEOLOGIJA 54/2, 205–222, Ljubljana 2011 doi:10.5474/geologija.2011.016 Mineralogy and mineral chemistry of rare-metal pegmatites at Abu Rusheid granitic gneisses, South Eastern Desert, Egypt Mohamed F. RASLAN & Mohamed A. ALI Nuclear Materials Authority, P.O. Box 530, El Maadi, Cairo, Egypt; e-mail: raslangains�hotmail.com Prejeto / Received 28. 2. 2011; Sprejeto / Accepted 22. 6. 2011 Key words: Hf-zircon, uranyl silicate minerals, Nb-Ta minerals, uraninite, Abu Rushied pegmatite, South Eastern Desert, Egypt Abstract The Abu Rushied area, situated in the South Eastern Desert of Egypt is a distinctive occurrence of economically important rare-metal mineralization where the host rocks are represented by granitic gneisses. Correspondingly, mineralogical and geochemical investigation of pegmatites pockets scattered within Abu Rusheid granitic gneisses revealed the presence of Hf-zircon, ferrocolumbite and uranyl silicate minerals (uranophane and kasolite). Elec- tron microprobe analyses revealed the presence of Nb-Ta multioxide minerals (ishikawaite, uranopyrochlore, and fergusonite), uraninite, thorite and cassiterite as numerous inclusions in the recorded Hf-zircon and ferrocolum- bite minerals. Abu Rusheid pegmatites are found as small and large bodies that occur as simple and complex (zoned) pegma- tites. Abu Rusheid rare-metal pegmatites occur as steeply dipping bodies of variable size, ranging from 1 to 5 m in width and 10 to 50 m in length. The zoned pegmatites are composed of wall zone of coarser granitic gneisses, intermediated zone of K-feldspar and pocket of mica (muscovite and biotite), and core of quartz and pocket of mica with lenses of rare metals. The zircon is of bipyramidal to typical octahedral form and short prisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Deposit Models for Northeast Asia
    Mineral Deposit Models for Northeast Asia By Alexander A. Obolenskiy1, Sergei M. Rodionov2, Sodov Ariunbileg3, Gunchin Dejidmaa4, Elimir G. Distanov1, Dangindorjiin Dorjgotov5, Ochir Gerel6, Duk Hwan Hwang7, Fengyue Sun8, Ayurzana Gotovsuren9, Sergei N. Letunov10, Xujun Li8, Warren J Nokleberg11, Masatsugu Ogasawara12, Zhan V. Seminsky13, Akexander P. Smelov14, Vitaly I. Sotnikov1, Alexander A. Spiridonov10, Lydia V. Zorina10, and Hongquan Yan8 1 Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 2 Russian Academy of Sciences, Khabarovsk 3 Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 4 Mineral Resources Authority of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar 5 Mongolian National University, Ulaanbaatar 6 Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Ulaanbaatar 7 Korea Institute of Geology, Mining, and Materials, Taejon 8 Jilin University, Changchun, China 9 Mongolia Ministry of Industry and Commerce, Ulaanbaatar 10 Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk 11 U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park 12 Geological Survey of Japan/AIST, Tsukuba 13 Irkutsk State Technical University, Irkutsk 14 Russian Academy of Sciences, Yakutsk This article is prepared by a large group of Russian, Chinese, Mongolian, South Korean, Introduction and Companion Japanese, Studies and USA geologists who are members of the joint Metalliferous and selected non-metalliferous lode international project on Major Mineral Deposits, and placer deposits for Northeast Asia are classified Metallogenesis, and Tectonics of the Northeast Asia. into various models or types described below. The This project is being conducted by the Russian mineral deposit types used in this report are based on Academy of Sciences, the Mongolian Academy of both descriptive and genetic information that is Sciences, Mongolian National University, Mongolian systematically arranged to describe the essential Technical University, the Mineral Resources Authority properties of a class of mineral deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SPVIEW Spectral Plot Program for Accessing the USGS Digital Spectral Library Database with MS - DOS Personal Computers VERSION 1.00 by K. Eric Livo, Roger N. Clark, and Daniel H. Knepper, Jr. Open-File Report 93-593 November, 1993 93 - 593 A Documentation (Paper Copy) 93 - 593 B 3 MS-DOS 3.5 inch diskettes containing Executable Programs, Source Code, Digital Mineral Spectral Library, and Digital Documentation This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with the U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Use of trade names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. Although these programs have been extensively tested, the USGS makes no guarantee of correct results. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado 80225 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................ i Introduction .............................. 1 Files Contained in This Release ..................... 2 \SPECTRA .............................. 2 \SPECTRA\SOURCE .......................... 2 Installation .............................. 4 Operation ................................ 4 Public Domain .............................. 6 Requirements .............................. 6 Program Users Guide ........................... 7 SPVIEW ............................... 7 main screen (expanded table of contents) ........... 7 main screen (collapsed table of contents) ........... 8 read record .......................... 8 text info (<r> read record-expanded
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclature of the Micas
    Mineralogical Magazine, April 1999, Vol. 63(2), pp. 267-279 Nomenclature of the micas M. RIEDER (CHAIRMAN) Department of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Mineral Resources, Charles University, Albertov 6, 12843 Praha 2, Czech Republic G. CAVAZZINI Dipartimento di Mineralogia e Petrologia, Universith di Padova, Corso Garibaldi, 37, 1-35122 Padova, Italy Yu. S. D'YAKONOV VSEGEI, Srednii pr., 74, 199 026 Sankt-Peterburg, Russia W. m. FRANK-KAMENETSKII* G. GOTTARDIt S. GUGGENHEIM Department of Geological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60607-7059, USA P. V. KOVAL' Institut geokhimii SO AN Rossii, ul. Favorskogo la, Irkutsk - 33, Russia 664 033 G. MOLLER Institut fiir Mineralogie und Mineralische Rohstoffe, Technische Universit/it Clausthal, Postfach 1253, D-38670 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany A. M, R. NEIVA Departamento de Ci6ncias da Terra, Universidade de Coimbra, Apartado 3014, 3049 Coimbra CODEX, Portugal E. W. RADOSLOVICH$ J.-L. ROBERT Centre de Recherche sur la Synth6se et la Chimie des Min6raux, C.N.R.S., 1A, Rue de la F6rollerie, 45071 Od6ans CEDEX 2, France F. P. SASSI Dipartimento di Mineralogia e Petrologia, Universit~t di Padova, Corso Garibaldi, 37, 1-35122 Padova, Italy H. TAKEDA Chiba Institute of Technology, 2-17-1 Tsudanuma, Narashino City, Chiba 275, Japan Z. WEISS Central Analytical Laboratory, Technical University of Mining and Metallurgy, T/'. 17.1istopadu, 708 33 Ostrava- Poruba, Czech Republic AND D. R. WONESw * Russia; died 1994 t Italy; died 1988 * Australia; resigned 1986 wUSA; died 1984 1999 The Mineralogical Society M. RIEDER ETAL. ABSTRACT I I End-members and species defined with permissible ranges of composition are presented for the true micas, the brittle micas, and the interlayer-deficient micas.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrigendum 2
    Vol. 55, No. 6, 2007 Clay mineralogy nomenclature 647 Table 1. Classification of planar hydrous phyllosilicates. Layer Interlayer material1 Group Octahedral Species2 type character 1:1 None or H2O only Serpentine-kaolin Trioctahedral Lizardite, berthierine, amesite, cronstedtite (x & 0) Dioctahedral Kaolinite, dickite, nacrite, halloysite (planar) Di,trioctahedral Odinite ———————————————————————————————— 2:1 None (x & 0) Talc-pyrophyllite Trioctahedral Talc, willemseite, kerolite, pimelite Dioctahedral Pyrophyllite, ferripyrophyllite Hydrated exchangeable Smectite Trioctahedral Saponite, hectorite, sauconite, stevensite, swinefordite cations (x & 0.2À0.6) Dioctahedral Montmorillonite, beidellite, nontronite, volkonskoite Hydrated exchangeable Vermiculite Trioctahedral Trioctahedral vermiculite cations (x & 0.6À0.9) Dioctahedral Dioctahedral vermiculite Non-hydrated mono- or Interlayer-deficient Trioctahedral Wonesite3,4 divalent cations mica Dioctahedral none4 (x & 0.6À0.85) Non-hydrated True (flexible) Trioctahedral Phlogopite, siderophyllite, aspidolite monovalent cations, mica Dioctahedral Muscovite, celadonite, paragonite (550% monovalent, x & 0.85À1.0 for dioctahedral) Non-hydrated divalent Brittle mica Trioctahedral Clintonite, kinoshitalite, bityite, anandite cations, (550% divalent, Dioctahedral Margarite, chernykhite x & 1.8À2.0) Hydroxide sheet Chlorite Trioctahedral Clinochlore, chamosite, pennantite, nimite, baileychlore (x = variable) Dioctahedral Donbassite Di,trioctahedral Cookeite, sudoite Tri,dioctahedral none ————————————————————————————————
    [Show full text]