Download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection Research Collection Doctoral Thesis Collective agro-food initiatives and sustainable rural development Articulation between internal governance and rural governance illustrated by geographical indications from Switzerland and Serbia Author(s): Paus, Marguerite Publication Date: 2010 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-006416325 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library DISS. ETH NO. 19216 Collective agro-food initiatives and sustainable rural development: articulation between internal governance and rural governance Illustrated by geographical indications from Switzerland and Serbia A dissertation submitted to ETH ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Sciences presented by MARGUERITE PAUS Master of Science (Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies), AgroParisTech / University Paris 7 / National Museum of Natural History, France Master’s degree in Engineering (Ingénieur Agronome), Montpellier SupAgro, France born June 16th, 1977 citizen of France and Germany accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Bernard Lehmann, examiner Dr. Dominique Barjolle, co-examiner Prof. Dr. François Hainard, co-examiner Dr. Sophie Réviron, co-examiner 2010 DISS. ETH NO. 19216 Collective agro-food initiatives and sustainable rural development: articulation between internal governance and rural governance Illustrated by geographical indications from Switzerland and Serbia A dissertation submitted to ETH ZURICH for the degree of Doctor of Sciences presented by MARGUERITE PAUS Master of Science (Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies), AgroParisTech / University Paris 7 / National Museum of Natural History, France Master’s degree in Engineering (Ingénieur Agronome), Montpellier SupAgro, France born June 16th, 1977 citizen of France and Germany accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Bernard Lehmann, examiner Dr. Dominique Barjolle, co-examiner Prof. Dr. François Hainard, co-examiner Dr. Sophie Réviron, co-examiner 2010 Table of contents Summary ........................................................................................................................... vi Résumé ............................................................................................................................ viii 1 General introduction .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Theoretical background ........................................................................................ 4 1.1.1 Collective agro-food initiatives ................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Sustainable rural development .................................................................. 12 1.1.3 Territorial Impact Assessment .................................................................. 18 1.1.4 Facilitation ................................................................................................. 25 1.1.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................. 30 1.2 Research questions and objectives ...................................................................... 31 1.2.1 General research choices ........................................................................... 31 1.2.2 Research questions .................................................................................... 33 1.3 Methodology ....................................................................................................... 34 1.4 Serbian context ................................................................................................... 39 1.4.1 Generalities ................................................................................................ 39 1.4.2 Rural development context ........................................................................ 40 1.4.3 Serbian agricultural and agro-food sectors ................................................ 41 1.4.4 Geographical indications in Serbia ........................................................... 44 1.5 Structure of the thesis ......................................................................................... 47 2 Geographical Indications in Transition Countries and their Governance. Evidence from Serbian Agro-food Initiatives .......................................................... 49 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 50 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 50 i 2.2 Governance forms of geographical indications .................................................. 51 2.2.1 Governance structure and hybrid forms .................................................... 51 2.2.2 Governance and territorial vs. sectoral strategies ...................................... 53 2.2.3 Organisational forms and governance strategy ......................................... 54 2.3 Why vertically integrate? .................................................................................... 55 2.4 Presentation of the case studies and comparison ................................................ 57 2.4.1 Context ...................................................................................................... 57 2.4.2 Kajmak from Kraljevo .............................................................................. 57 2.4.3 Raspberries from Arilje ............................................................................. 58 2.4.4 Comparison of the cases ............................................................................ 59 2.5 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 61 2.5.1 Concurrent sourcing and market power .................................................... 61 2.5.2 Potential evolution of governance ............................................................. 63 2.6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 65 3 Facilitating the Emergence of a Collective Initiative. Role and Leadership Style of Facilitators in Emergent Geographical Indications ................................................ 67 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 68 3.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 68 3.2 On the concepts of “facilitator” and “leadership” .............................................. 69 3.2.1 Definition of “facilitator” .......................................................................... 69 3.2.2 Analytical framework to analyse the interaction of the “facilitator-group- context” ..................................................................................................... 70 3.2.3 Facilitation and leadership’s style ............................................................. 75 3.3 GIs and facilitation ............................................................................................. 77 3.3.1 Governance structure of established GI organisations .............................. 77 3.3.2 Reasons for producers to join the collective organisation ......................... 78 3.3.3 GI systems and facilitation ........................................................................ 78 ii 3.3.4 Motivation and goals in GIs systems ........................................................ 79 3.4 Method and case studies presentation ................................................................. 80 3.4.1 Materials and method ................................................................................ 80 3.4.2 Presentation of the GIs and the facilitation process .................................. 81 3.5 Results ................................................................................................................. 86 3.5.1 Competence building ................................................................................. 86 3.5.2 Structuring the group ................................................................................. 86 3.5.3 Catalysing the group process ..................................................................... 87 3.5.4 Mobilising external resources ................................................................... 88 3.5.5 Capacity building at institutional level ...................................................... 88 3.6 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 90 3.7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 95 4. Measure of the Territorial Impact of Agro-food Initiatives: Lessons from two Swiss case studies ........................................................................................................ 98 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 99 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 99 4.2 Territorial impact and Swiss policy on regional development ......................... 100 4.3 State of the
Recommended publications
  • Victor Chirkin
    30 Crusade. It has become Slow Food’s new hot topic: from this point forth, “sentinels of flavour” will be prohibited from using commercial starter cultures. Along with the “natural cheese” designation, strong philosophical aspirations are emerging—ones that stand the test of the industry’s needs and realities. “Natural” cheeses: going the distance? R D By Débora The theme of this year’s Slow Food Cheese Kefir grains Pereira event (slated to take place in Bra, Italy, from September 15 to 18) is Natural is Possible, advocating cheesemaking without the use of commercial starter cultures. “It is a question of biodiversity preservation,” argues Piero Sardo, President of the Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity. “Nowadays, everyone is using the same starter cultures, thereby erasing the ability to link a cheese to its terroir. Moreover, it is a matter of survival for small farmers. I am surprised,” he points out, “by how difficult it is for the French to Methods address this issue.” He believes that there is There are four no logic to working with raw milk if you are main methods to going to use commercial starter cultures. cultivate starter However, apart from the Brousse du Rove, cultures at home: most French “sentinel” cheeses, such as Salers backslopping Tradition, Laguiole, and the cheeses of the whey from one summer pastures of the Basque Pyrenees, cheese to make resort to exogenous starter cultures, at least to Marie-Christine Montel, a retired microbiologist another (such as kick off the season. of INRA’s Aurillac cheese facility, remembers how the Salers AOP (protected designation of with farmstead • Backslopping origin) greatly benefited from the introduction of lactic chevres) commercial starter cultures since, at the time, it backslopping provided solutions to manufacturing problems The main challenge for those who engage in on fermented such as post-acidification.
    [Show full text]
  • Montbeliarde : Bred for the French Cheese Industry
    Montbeliarde : Bred for the French cheese Industry The main use of milk in France is cheese making and France is recognized widely and internationally for its high quality and diversity of cheeses. It looks like a detail but the cheese industry allowed a lot of mountain areas to sustain economically thanks to their pastures and cows herds. Areas like Alps, Jura, Pyrenees, Massif Central and Vosges are renowned for their specific cheeses that keep local activities in hard access regions. More recently, changes that are affecting the dairy industry lead to more added value products such as cheese, which gives new opportunities for that industry. To achieve better economic efficiency, dairy farmers of the Montbeliarde area (Central east of France) organized themselves for decades around local cooperatives running small cheese plants called “Fruitières”. There, dairy farmers sell cheese instead of milk and developed strategies to get a better product, increasing cheese yield (on the cow side) and increasing the quality and flavour of cheese (process side). All this led to a maximum of added value and made “Comte” cheese the N°1 high quality cheese in all France for years (45.000 tons/year). The genetic side is important and several scientific studies demonstrated it. The cheese process depends a lot on both bacteriological and organoleptical milk quality. A- Factors influencing Cheese Yield 1-Protein content Cheese Yield is proportional to milk % of protein up to 3,8%. Above that figure, cheese yield doesn’t increase significatively. 2-Casein type. Casein is the principal protein in milk. During the cheese making process, casein solidifies, curdles or coagulates into cheese through the action of rennet.
    [Show full text]
  • How Cow Characteristics and Management Influence the Sensory
    How cow characteristics and management influence the sensory properties of milk and cheese? Bruno Martin, Isabelle Verdier-Metz, Anne Ferlay, Jean-Louis Berdagué, Agnes Cornu, Yves Chilliard, Jean Baptiste Coulon, Marie-Christine Montel To cite this version: Bruno Martin, Isabelle Verdier-Metz, Anne Ferlay, Jean-Louis Berdagué, Agnes Cornu, et al.. How cow characteristics and management influence the sensory properties of milk and cheese?. The Scienceof Artisan Cheese, Aug 2014, North Cadbury Court, Somerset, United Kingdom. pp.29. hal-02801965 HAL Id: hal-02801965 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02801965 Submitted on 5 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Science of Artisan Cheese 19th -20th August 2014 North Cadbury Court, Somerset How cow characteristics and management influence the sensory properties of milk and cheese? B Martin1 1INRA, Joint Research Unit (UMR) Herbivores, Theix, France Co-workers: I Verdier-Metz2, A Ferlay1, JL Berdagué3, A Cornu1, Y Chilliard1, JB Coulon1 , MC Montel2 2INRA, Cheese Research Unit (URF), Aurillac,
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Ruminant Management and Sensory Characteristics of Cheeses: a Review
    Lait 84 (2004) 221–241 © INRA, EDP Sciences, 2004 221 DOI: 10.1051/lait:2004008 Review Relationships between ruminant management and sensory characteristics of cheeses: a review Jean-Baptiste COULONa*, Agnès DELACROIX-BUCHETb, Bruno MARTINa, Antonio PIRISIc a Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, INRA, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France b Unité de Recherches Laitières et Génétique Appliquée, INRA, Domaine de Vilvert, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France c Istituto Zootecnico e Caseario per la Sardegna, Regione Bonassai, 07040 Olmedo, Italy Received 25 July 2003 – Accepted 8 December 2003 Published online 26 March 2004 Abstract – This review summarises the last 10 years’ knowledge established on the relationships between the management of animals (genetics, physiology and feeding) and the sensory quality of cheese. In the production of full-fat raw milk cheese, the cow’s breed can modify the texture of cheeses because of differences in fat in dry matter content due to variations in the fat/protein ratio in milk. Within the same breed, large differences in texture and taste were observed between cheeses β α issued from milk differing by the genetic variant of -casein (in dairy cows) or s1- casein (in goats). Except in very early or late lactation, the physiological stage had no significant effect on cheese sen- sory characteristics. In contrast, mastitis has a well-known negative impact on cheese sensory pro- perties. Feeding dairy cows or goats with corn silage by comparison with hay or grass silage leads to whiter cheeses and sometimes to differences in flavour. Conserving grass as silage, by compari- son with hay, has no important effect on cheese sensory characteristics, except on colour, which is yellower with grass silage.
    [Show full text]
  • Recipes from Our Mountains Goutez a La Tradition Montagnarde Avec Sherpa Et Mickey Bourdillat ! Savour Traditional Mountain Meals with Sherpa and Mickey Bourdillat!
    Recettes Montagnesdenos Recipes from our mountains Goutez a la tradition montagnarde avec Sherpa et Mickey Bourdillat ! Savour traditional mountain meals with Sherpa and Mickey Bourdillat! Depuis près de 10 ans, Sherpa et Mickey Bourdillat, For almost 10 years now, Sherpa and Mickey le chef du restaurant Le Matafan à Chamonix, Bourdillat, the chef of the Matafan restaurant in Entrées Plats Desserts travaillent main dans la main pour vous offrir de Chamonix, have been working hand in the hand Starters Main courses Desserts savoureux livrets de recettes. writing tasty snack and meal recipes just for you. Cette saison, Sherpa a décidé de mettre en avant This season, Sherpa proposes a selection of p. 4 p. 10 p. 28 une sélection de recettes traditionnelles de nos traditional recipes from our mountain resorts, and stations de montagne. as in previous years, has called on the know-how Et comme les années précédentes, Sherpa a fait and sensitivity of Mickey to sublimate them! appel au savoir-faire et à la sensibilité de Mickey Retrouvez toutes So try them out during your stay or when you get ces recettes sur pour les sublimer ! back home. Astuces du Chef Terre All these recipes are on Découvrez-les à votre tour lors de votre séjour en Enjoy! sherpa.net station ou à votre retour chez vous. Tips from the chef de l'Alpe Bonnes recettes ! p. 34 p. 35 2 3 Preparation : 30 mn Cuisson : 8 mn Difficulteé R R R Sélection Terre de l’Alpe Beurre, œufs bio, tomme fraîche Preparation : 30 mins Baking : 8 mins Alpes du Sud Terre de l’Alpe selection La Joue
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between Flavour and Chemical Composition Of
    Relationships between flavour and chemical composition of Abondance cheese derived from different types of pastures Christophe Bugaud, S Buchin, Agnès Hauwuy, Jean-Baptiste Coulon To cite this version: Christophe Bugaud, S Buchin, Agnès Hauwuy, Jean-Baptiste Coulon. Relationships between flavour and chemical composition of Abondance cheese derived from different types of pastures. Le Lait, INRA Editions, 2001, 81 (6), pp.757-773. 10.1051/lait:2001162. hal-00895376 HAL Id: hal-00895376 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00895376 Submitted on 1 Jan 2001 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Lait 81 (2001) 757-773 757 © INRA, EDP Sciences, 2001 Original article Relationships between flavour and chemical composition of Abondance cheese derived from different types of pastures Christophe BUGAUDa, Solange BUCHINa*, Agnès HAUWUYb, Jean-Baptiste COULONc a Technologie et Analyses Laitières, INRA, BP 89, 39801 Poligny Cedex, France b Groupement d’Intérêt Scientifique des Alpes du Nord, 11 rue Métropole, 73000 Chambéry, France c Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, INRA, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France (Received 12 February 2001; accepted 24 April 2001) Abstract — The relationships between the flavour and composition of half-cooked pressed Abondance cheese (Haute-Savoie, France) were studied under natural cheese production conditions on the basis of different pastures exploited by 3 producers.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Benefits and Risks of Organic Raw Milk Cheese
    Evaluating the benefits Master’s and risks of organic raw Thesis milk cheese. Challenges in the production of 2014 organic cheeses made from raw milk. Picture was taken at Caws Teifi Cheese, Wales Szabolcs Elek Student ID: 201301852 Supervisor: Mette Krogh Larsen Master in Organic Agriculture Department of Food Science – and Food Systems, University of Aarhus University Hohenheim (D) & Aarhus University (DK) 2014.10.10. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Materials and methods ....................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter I. - Regulation of raw and organic milk ...................................................................................... 2 Basic requirements for producing raw milk ........................................................................................ 2 Producing raw milk cheese .................................................................................................................. 3 Processing facilities ............................................................................................................................. 3 Exception ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Microbiological characteristics of raw-milk cheese ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Action for Territorial Quality Differentiation of Cheese In
    Collective action for territorial quality differentiation of cheese in mountain areas: Case studies of the Campos de Cima da Serra in Brazil and the Province of Trento in Italy Carine Pachoud matriculation number: 1653510 Dissertation submitted under the doctoral program Geography presented to the Institute of Geography Faculty of Geo- and Atmospheric Sciences University of Innsbruck Supervised by Univ.-Prof. Dr. Martin Coy (primary supervisor) and Univ.-Prof. Dr. Markus Schermer Composition of the jury: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Johann Stötter, University of Innsbruck - President Univ.-Prof. Dr. Martin Coy, University of Innsbruck - Evaluator Univ.-Prof. Dr. Marianne Penker, University of Vienna - BOKU – Evaluator Defense date and location: Innsbruck, September 10 2020 Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit an Eides statt durch meine eigenhändige Unterschrift, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbständig verfasst und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel verwendet habe. Alle Stellen, die wörtlich oder inhaltlich den angegebenen Quellen entnommen wurden, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form noch nicht als Dissertation eingereicht. ________________________________ ________________________________ Datum Unterschrift iii Acknowledgment This PhD thesis is the result of more than three years of research, which was intense and rich in learning. I would therefore like to express my gratitude to all those who helped me to accomplish this research. First of all, I am thankful to Jean-François Tourrand, who made it possible to realize this thesis and who always believed in me. Jean-François established the contact to people all around the world, to my supervisors and to many others who turned out to be essential for the realization of my work.
    [Show full text]
  • Facteurs De Production Et Qualité Sensorielle Des Fromages1
    INRA, Prod. Anim., 2005, 18 (1), 49-62 Facteurs de production et qualité sensorielle des fromages1 J.B. COULON1, A. DELACROIX-BUCHET2, B. MARTIN1, A. PIRISI3 1 INRA, Unité de Recherches sur les Herbivores, F-63122 Theix 2 INRA, Unité de Recherches Laitières et Génétique Appliquée, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas 3 Istituto Zootecnico e Caseario per la Sardegna, I-07040 Olmedo Courriel : [email protected] Les caractéristiques sensorielles des fromages sont une préoccupation importante des filières. Leur liaison avec les facteurs de production du lait sont à l’origine de nombreux débats, en particulier dans le cadre de l’élaboration de cahiers des charges spécifiques. Ces caractéris- tiques sensorielles dépendent-elles de la race des animaux, de leur état sanitaire ou de leur alimentation ? Ce texte fait la synthèse des travaux réalisés sur le sujet depuis une dizaine d’années et propose quelques éléments d’explication des effets mis en évidence. La qualité sensorielle des fromages mises par le développement des métho- les vaches de race Normande, dépend d’un grand nombre de facteurs, des d’analyses des caractéristiques sen- Montbéliarde ou Brune produisent un liés à la fois à la technologie de fabrica- sorielles des fromages et par la maîtrise lait plus riche en protéines et de meilleu- tion et aux caractéristiques chimiques ou le contrôle des paramètres technolo- re aptitude fromagère que celui de et microbiologiques de la matière pre- giques de fabrication fromagère. Elles vaches Holstein conduites dans les mière mise en œuvre. Ces dernières concernent à la fois des travaux réalisés mêmes conditions (Froc et al 1988, dépendent elles-mêmes de nombreux en conditions expérimentales sur les Macheboeuf et al 1993, Malossini et al facteurs d’amont (d’origine génétique, laits de mélange de quelques animaux 1996, Auldist et al 2002, Mistry et al physiologique, alimentaire...).
    [Show full text]
  • Carte-Fruitiere-Web-Val-Thorens-En.Pdf
    STARTERS TO START GILLARDEAU N°3 OYSTERS, 6 oysters 25 GILLARDEAU N°3 OYSTERS, 12 oysters 48 REBLOCHON LOLLIPOPS Curly salad and farmhouse bacon 21 GYOZA Homemade veal & foie gras ravioli 23 BURGUNDY SNAILS Crispy wheat shells, parsley coulis 19 ASSIETTE FRUITIERE Assorted selection of cheeses from Savoy 21 STARTERS SPIDER CRAB Cold served —esh, avocado and asian coco foam 26 Prices in Euros, inc taxes and service charge DUCK FOIE GRAS Marbled with dried fruit and pear poached in Mondeuse wine 28 PATA NEGRA PLATTER Cervelle de canut cheese spread and cep mushroom focaccia 29 OCTOPUS CARPACCIO Piquillos, mango, passion fruit and saffron ice cream 24 SALMON GRAVLAX BIO Horseradish cream, cauli—ower pickles and homemade brioche 26 FINE TART Cooked and raw vegetables, candied onions and Beaufort cheese mousse 19 BURRATINA IGP Lardo di Colonnata, riquette salad, hazelnuts, and Périgord black truf—e 28 MARROW BONE Sour condiments, crisp brioche and winter minestrone 19 SOUPS CEP MUSHROOM VELOUTÉ 63° poached egg and grilled bacon 24 ONION SOUPS, WHITE & BRUNE Served with rustic bread soldiers 18 SMOOTH BUTTERNUT SOUP Savoie soft goat cheese, seedlings and brioche croutons 19 All our dishes can be adapted to your diet MAIN COURSES FISH e ROASTED TURBOT RED LABEL Morels, baby onions and Bordelaise sauce 38 SAVOIE»S RAINBOW TROUT Royans ravioli, carrots shavings, Beaufort cheese chips 29 PIKE PERCH FILET In brioche crust, spinachs and Grenobloise condiments 34 MEATS BRAISED BEEF CHEEK Steamed colorful carrots 29 Prices in Euros, inc taxes and service
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Thermal Processing of Skim Milk: Impact on Microbial Reduction
    Non-thermal processing of skim milk: Impact on microbial reduction, physico-chemical properties and quality of Brie type cheese by Dipendra Khanal A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Food Science Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Dipendra Khanal, May, 2014 ABSTRACT NON-THERMAL PROCESSING OF SKIM MILK: IMPACT ON MICROBIAL REDUCTION, PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND QUALITY OF BRIE TYPE CHEESE Dipendra Khanal Advisor: University of Guelph, 2014 Dr. Mansel W. Griffiths Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF) and Microfiltration (MF) are emerging non-thermal technologies that are gaining in popularity, since they preserve food by inactivation of microorganisms and fulfill the demand for minimally processed and fresh-like foods with natural taste and extended shelf life. The present research investigated the effect of either stand-alone or a combination of PEF and MF treatments on microbial reduction, physicochemical properties in skim milk and its comparison with HTST treatments, and also explored the quality of Brie type cheese preparation and its comparison with raw milk cheese. Reduction in microbial load by non-thermal technologies were comparable or even better than HTST treatments, and effects on physico-chemical properties were varied depending on the use of different pore sized MFs. Significant effects of non-thermal technologies were not observed on cheese quality and microbial analysis of ripened cheese did not detect the presence of pathogenic bacteria. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank my supervisor Dr. Mansel W. Griffiths for his support, encouragement and enthusiasm during my graduate work. Dr. Griffiths has provided an opportunity to explore new world of science and technology by accepting me as a graduate student and welcomed by showing faith and provided the environment to update my knowledge in food science field, not only as a graduate student, but also as a researcher and problem shooter.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Action for Territorial Quality Differentiation
    Collective action for territorial quality differentiation of cheese in mountain areas: Case studies of the Campos de Cima da Serra in Brazil and the Province of Trento in Italy Carine Pachoud matriculation number: 1653510 Dissertation submitted under the doctoral program Geography presented to the Institute of Geography Faculty of Geo- and Atmospheric Sciences University of Innsbruck Supervised by Univ.-Prof. Dr. Martin Coy (primary supervisor) and Univ.-Prof. Dr. Markus Schermer Innsbruck, March 3 2020 Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit an Eides statt durch meine eigenhändige Unterschrift, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbständig verfasst und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel verwendet habe. Alle Stellen, die wörtlich oder inhaltlich den angegebenen Quellen entnommen wurden, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form noch nicht als Dissertation eingereicht. ________________________________ ________________________________ Datum Unterschrift iii Acknowledgment This PhD thesis is the result of more than three years of research, which was intense and rich in learning. I would therefore like to express my gratitude to all those who helped me to accomplish this research. First of all, I am thankful to Jean-François Tourrand, who made it possible to realize this thesis and who always believed in me. Jean-François established the contact to people all around the world, to my supervisors and to many others who turned out to be essential for the realization of my work. More generally, the progression of my questioning was facilitated by discussions with the researchers from the research unit Management of Renewable Resources and Environment (GREEN), at the International Center in Agronomic Research for Development (CIRAD).
    [Show full text]