DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding Australia's Cultural History Through Archaeological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding Australia's Cultural History Through Archaeological Understanding Australia’s Cultural History Through Archaeological Geophysics Kelsey M. Lowe BA, Minnesota State University Moorhead, 2003 MA, University of Mississippi, 2005 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2014 School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management i Abstract The aim of this thesis is to develop and apply geophysical methods for Australian archaeology. The methods focus on magnetic susceptibility and ground-penetrating radar (GPR). The techniques are contextualised through application to the following four key archaeological questions: 1) Can magnetic susceptibility assist in resolving questions surrounding the potential downward movement of stone artefacts in rockshelter deposits? 2) Is human occupation persistent through the changing climatic regime associated with the last glacial maximum (LGM) at a Pleistocene-aged rockshelter in interior Australia? 3) How might we identify burials in a geologically complex rockshelter deposit? 4) How might magnetic susceptibility contribute to knowledge about the formation of ‘archaeologically instantaneous’ shell matrix sites? In exploring these questions, research was conducted at two rockshelters in northern Australia and on three shell mounds in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Magnetic susceptibility studies were undertaken at Gledswood Shelter 1 (GS1), a rockshelter occupied at ca 38,000 BP, to understand its history and formation processes. An experimental burning program using off-site samples was conducted to confirm that magnetically enhanced sediments in the cultural deposits were the direct result of anthropogenic burning rather than natural fires, pedogenesis or weathering. This change coincides with the level at which stone artefacts appear in the sedimentary sequence, indicating that they are in situ and have not moved down from higher layers above. Demonstrating that an increase in magnetic susceptibility is associated with human occupation is a crucial development in Australian archaeology. This will provide an opportunity to link sediments and artefacts—and this is critical to comprehending the timing of initial occupation of the continent. Magnetic susceptibility data combined with micromorphology and geoarchaeological data also revealed that occupation was continuous through the LGM at GS1, without any abandonment of the site. GS1 is situated in a region that has been characterised as a potential corridor for early colonists moving into the arid interior. The appearance of stone artefacts in the deposits corresponding with an increase in magnetic susceptibility as well as clay and charcoal coatings on quartz grains in the Pleistocene units in thin section, indicate that the site was occupied through this period, thereby implying that water was at least locally available. Despite the absence of any obvious permanent water sources, water availability at the site is i reliant on summer rainfall. This suggests that the monsoons driven by the Coral Sea off the northeast Australian coastline may have been active during this time. This has important implications for understanding climatic conditions during that period, and allows one to infer that water must have been available regionally for people to have maintained their use of the site. GPR carried out in advance of archaeological excavations at Madjedbebe, a sandstone rockshelter in western Arnhem Land, identified numerous subsurface rocks (large cobbles); excavation subsequently revealed these were associated with human burials. Post-excavation, geographical information systems (GIS) and statistical analysis clarified that a relationship between rocks and human burials exists. Graves were dug within the shelter and rocks were placed on the individuals before being covered. The rocks were the source of the strong GPR reflections and insights into burial practices derived from ethnographic sources further assisted with the geophysical interpretation. Application of this methodology provides an opportunity to test a way to identify unmarked burials at other rockshelter sites, and a useful management tool for Indigenous communities and heritage practitioners since it is non- invasive and non-destructive. The third group of sites is the shell mounds located in the Gulf of Carpentaria. Despite archaeological evidence including radiocarbon dates suggesting a single episode of deposition at these sites, the magnetic susceptibility combined with a range of sedimentary and archaeological analyses revealed that these shell mounds were repeatedly occupied. Results also demonstrated that magnetic signatures were related to cultural formation processes most likely from anthropogenic burning, rather than natural processes. These correlations between geophysical indicators and artefactual material suggest that the site retain a high degree of stratigraphic integrity. This has important implications for studies of other shell mounds sites, especially where the limitations of radiocarbon dating may mask multiple depositional events. In summary, this thesis demonstrates that both magnetic susceptibility and GPR studies can be valuable tools in deciphering key archaeological questions in the Australian landscape. The most important findings relate to the ability of magnetic susceptibility signals to clearly define levels at which humans first appear in the archaeological record. This will allow a major progress in determining the timing and dispersion of human settlements for Australian sites. ii Declaration by author This thesis is composed of my original work, and contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference has been made in the text. I have clearly stated the contribution by others to jointly-authored works that I have included in my thesis. I have clearly stated the contribution of others to my thesis as a whole, including statistical assistance, survey design, data analysis, significant technical procedures, professional editorial advice, and any other original research work used or reported in my thesis. The content of my thesis is the result of work I have carried out since the commencement of my research higher degree candidature and does not include a substantial part of work that has been submitted to qualify for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution. I have clearly stated which parts of my thesis, if any, have been submitted to qualify for another award. I acknowledge that an electronic copy of my thesis must be lodged with the University Library and, subject to the General Award Rules of The University of Queensland, immediately made available for research and study in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. I acknowledge that copyright of all material contained in my thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of that material. Where appropriate I have obtained copyright permission from the copyright holder to reproduce material in this thesis. iii Publications during candidature Peer-reviewed papers: Lowe, K. M. 2012 Review of geophysical applications in Australian archaeology. Australian Archaeology 74:71–84. Lowe, K. M., L. A. Wallis, C. Pardoe, B. Marwick, C. Clarkson, T. Manne, M. A. Smith and R. Fullagar 2014 Ground-penetrating radar and burial practices in Western Arnhem Land, Australia. Archaeology in Oceania 49:148–157. Rosendahl, D., K. M. Lowe, L. A. Wallis and S. Ulm 2014 Integrating geoarchaeology and magnetic susceptibility at three shell mounds: A pilot study from the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Journal of Archaeological Science 49:21–32. Conference Abstracts: Lowe, K. M. (Upcoming 2014). Australian Archaeological Association (AAA) Annual Conference. Session Co-Convener with A. S. Fogel: Remotely sensed landscapes in 21st archaeology), Cairns, Australia, December. Lowe, K. M., A. Fogel, B. Barker and L. Lamb (Upcoming 2014) Public archaeology working together with archaeological research: A multiple method geophysical survey of an early historic period inn at Drayton, QUEENSLAND. Paper presented at the AAA Annual Conference, Cairns, Australia, December. Kenady, S., K. M. Lowe, S. Ulm and P. Ridd (Upcoming 2014) Multi-method geophysical survey of large shell matrix sites: A case study from Thundiy, Bentinck Island, Gulf of Carpentaria. Paper presented at the AAA Annual Conference, Cairns, Australia, December. Wallis, L. A., K. M. Lowe, R. Popelka-Filcoff, J. Bennett, C. St George, K. Fitzsimmons, C. Lenehan, A. Watchman, C. Wight and J. Matthews 2014 Ochre fragments through the late Quaternary at Gledswood Shelter 1, northwest Queensland. Paper presented at the Australasian Quaternary Association (AQUA) Annual Conference, Mildura, Australia. iv Lowe, K. M., L. A. Wallis, C. Pardoe, B. Marwick, C. Clarkson, T. Manne, M. Smith and R. Fullagar 2013 Ground-penetrating radar and burial practices in western Arnhem Land. Paper presented at the AAA Annual Conference, Coffs Harbor, Australia, July. Wallis, L. A., C. Pardoe, T. Manne, K. M. Lowe, J. Matthews, C. Clarkson, B. Marwick, R. Fullagar and M. Smith 2013 Much more than just an old site: Human remains from the 2012 excavations at Madjedbebe, western Arnhem Land, Australia. Paper presented at the AAA Annual Conference, Coffs Harbor, Australia, December. Fogel, A., D. Rosendahl, J. Budby, J. Budby, K. M. Lowe and L. A. Wallis 2013 Mapping the invisible: Using magnetic susceptibility to assist in hearth salvage and site mapping on a mine site in central Queensland. Paper
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2008-2009
    National Trust of Queensland Annual Report 2008-2009 National Trust of Queensland CONTENTS Page President’s Overview 1-7 Treasurer’s Report 7 Sponsors and Partners 8 Heritage Conservation Appeals 8 Grants 8 Executive Board 9 Council 9 Patron 9 Trust Committees, Branches, Working Groups and 10 Chairpersons “What we care National Trust of Queensland Staff 10 for today, we will appreciate Major Donors and Bequests 11 tomorrow” Visitation Figures 11 Awards 2008 11-12 Financial Report—National Trust of Queensland 13-36 Financial Report—National Trust of Queensland 37-63 Currumbin Wildlife Sanctuary NATIONAL TRUST OF QUEENSLAND National Trust House 95 William Street Brisbane, Queensland, 4000 T: 07 3223 6666 F: 07 3229 0146 E: [email protected] W: www.nationaltrustqld.org National Trust of Queensland Page 1 PRESIDENT’S OVERVIEW EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2008-09 has been, once again, a very busy and challenging year, but we continue to make substantial progress. We believe our conservation objectives are very important and this makes the many challenges worthwhile. The National Trust is a true conservation movement, both internationally and locally. We remain vitally interested in Caption describing picture or graphic. our built heritage, our cultural heritage, our natural environment, and our Indigenous heritage. What we care for today, we will appreciate tomorrow. Financially, the book loss for the financial year 2008/9 increased to over $408,000, which is certainly substantial. However, a $480,000 loss from disposal of assets we did not own was tempered by a very generous bequest. In all, the actual operating loss was just over $100,000, which is Even with the two-tier Board structure, Currumbin Wildlife still substantial.
    [Show full text]
  • Minjiwarra : Archaeological Evidence of Human Occupation of Australia's
    This is a repository copy of Minjiwarra : archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/161242/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Veth, P., Ditchfield, K., Bateman, M. orcid.org/0000-0003-1756-6046 et al. (5 more authors) (2019) Minjiwarra : archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP. Australian Archaeology, 85 (2). pp. 115-125. ISSN 0312-2417 https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2019.1650479 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Archaeology on 19th August 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03122417.2019.1650479. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Minjiwarra: archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP Peter Veth1, Kane Ditchfield1, Mark Bateman2, Sven Ouzman1, Marine Benoit1, Ana Paula Motta1, Darrell Lewis3, Sam Harper1, and Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rock Art of Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II)
    5 The rock art of Madjedbebe (Malakunanja II) Sally K. May, Paul S.C. Taçon, Duncan Wright, Melissa Marshall, Joakim Goldhahn and Inés Domingo Sanz Introduction The western Arnhem Land site of Madjedbebe – a site hitherto erroneously named Malakunanja II in scientific and popular literature but identified as Madjedbebe by senior Mirarr Traditional Owners – is widely recognised as one of Australia’s oldest dated human occupation sites (Roberts et al. 1990a:153, 1998; Allen and O’Connell 2014; Clarkson et al. 2017). Yet little is known of its extensive body of rock art. The comparative lack of interest in rock art by many archaeologists in Australia during the 1960s into the early 1990s meant that rock art was often overlooked or used simply to illustrate the ‘real’ archaeology of, for example, stone artefact studies. As Hays-Gilpen (2004:1) suggests, rock art was viewed as ‘intractable to scientific research, especially under the science-focused “new archaeology” and “processual archaeology” paradigms of the 1960s through the early 1980s’. Today, things have changed somewhat, and it is no longer essential to justify why rock art has relevance to wider archaeological studies. That said, archaeologists continued to struggle to connect the archaeological record above and below ground at sites such as Madjedbebe. For instance, at this site, Roberts et al. (1990a:153) recovered more than 1500 artefacts from the lowest occupation levels, including ‘silcrete flakes, pieces of dolerite and ground haematite, red and yellow ochres, a grindstone and a large number of amorphous artefacts made of quartzite and white quartz’. The presence of ground haematite and ochres in the lowest deposits certainly confirms the use of pigment by the early, Pleistocene inhabitants of this site.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology and Development / Peter G. Gould
    Theme01: Archaeology and Development / Peter G. Gould Poster T01-91P / Mohammed El Khalili / Managing Change in an ever-Changing Archeological Landscape: Safeguard the Natural and Cultural Landscape of Jarash T01-92P / Wai Man Raymond Lee / Archaeology and Development: a Case Study under the Context of Hong Kong T01A / RY103 / SS5,SS6 T01A01 / Emmanuel Ndiema / Engaging Communities in Cultural Heritage Conservation: Perspectives from Kakapel, Western Kenya T01A02 / Paul Edward Montgomery / Branding Barbarians: The Development of Renewable Archaeotourism Destinations to Re-Present Marginalized Cultures of the Past T01A03 / Selvakumar Veerasamy / Historical Sites and Monuments and Community Development: Practical Issues and ground realities T01A04 / Yoshitaka SASAKI / Sustainable Utilization Approach to Cultural Heritage and the Benefits for Tourists and Local Communities: The Case of Akita Fortification, Akita prefecture, Japan. T01A05 / Angela Kabiru / Sustainable Development and Tourism: Issues and Challenges in Lamu old Town T01A06 / Chulani Rambukwella / ENDANGERED ARCHAEOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE OF THE WORLD HERITAGE CITY OF KANDY AND ITS SUBURBS IN SRI LANKA T01A07 / chandima bogahawatta / Sigiriya: World’s Oldest Living Heritage and Multi Tourist Attraction T01A08 / Shahnaj Husne Jahan Leena / Sustainable Development through Archaeological Heritage Management and Eco-Tourism at Bhitargarh in Bangladesh T01A09 / OLALEKAN AKINADE / IGBO UKWU ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE AS A BOOST TO NIGERIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE OLALEKAN AJAO AKINADE, [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Anatomically Modern Humans (June 2017) How Evolution Proceeds and Species Arise Are Affected by Many Different Processes
    Human evolution and migrations Neanderthals and dental hygiene (March 2017) Teeth are the most likely parts of skeletons to survive for long periods because of their armour by a layer of enamel made of hydroxyapatite (Ca5(PO4)3(OH)). Dental enamel is the hardest material in the bodies of vertebrate animals and lies midway between fluorite and feldspar on Moh’s scale of hardness (value 5). Like the mineral apatite, teeth survive abrasion, comminution and dissolution for long periods in the surface environment. Subdivision of fossil hominin species and even among different groups of living humans relies to a marked extent on the morphology of their teeth’s biting and chewing surface. Although there are intriguing examples in Neolithic jawbones of dental cavities having been filled it is rather lack of attention to teeth that characterises hominin fossils. As well as horrifying signs of mandibular erosion due to massive root abscesses, a great many hominin remains carry large accumulations of dental plaque or calculus made of mineralised biofilm laid down by oral bacteria. Even assiduous brushing only delays the build up. Grisly as this inevitability might seem, plaque is an excellent means of preserving not only the bacteria but traces of what an individual ate. As fossil DNA is a guide to ancestry and relatedness among fossil hominins, so far going back to about 430 ka in the case of a Spanish Homo heidelburgensis, plaque potentially may reveal details of diet and to some extent social behaviour elaborating beyond the possibilities presented by carbon isotopes and dental wear patterns. Plaque deposits have already shown that Neanderthals had a very varied vegetable diet (see Neanderthal diet, gait and ornamentation March 2011) and that they cooked their food, the sugars thereby released encouraging bacterial biofilms.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor's Note
    Volume 8: Issue 1 (2021) Editor’s Note CONTENTS Dear ICA Members, Editor’s Note .................. 1 Welcome to 2021! We are now a year into the COVID-19 pandemic, and with vaccines on the market, we are seeing the light at the end Meetings, of the tunnel. Announcements, and Calls for Papers .............. 3 The ICA Interest group will be meeting at this year’s virtual SAA Research Highlights ....... 4 meeting on April 16 from 12-1 PM EDT. Please join us to learn more about the group, get involved, and network with colleagues. All are Lapidary artwork in the welcome! Amerindian Caribbean, a regional, open, online Over the past year, there have been over 1000 new publications in database and GIS ....... 4 81 different journals in our field. In addition, several new books have The La Sagesse been published, four of which are featured in our “Recent Community Publications” section. The quantity and quality of new literature attests to the fact that, despite the pandemic, island and coastal Archaeology Project research is thriving. (LCAP) in Grenada, West Indies ................ 6 As always, please continue to send us your new publications. While Recent Publications ....... 7 we do not rely exclusively on sources sent to us by our members, we usually receive at least one member submission from a journal that Featured New Books: 7 we missed in our biannual literature review. Your submissions help Journals Featuring to provide publicity for your work and assists us in putting together a Recent Island and more thorough bibliography each cycle. Coastal Archaeology Papers: ....................... 8 The last issue of the Current appeared when wildfires and political scandal dominated news headlines, and coastal archaeologists faced New Papers in the reports of accelerating sea level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Archaeology (AA) Editorial Board Meeting the AA Editorial Board Meeting Will Be Held on Thursday 7 December from 1.00 - 2.00Pm in Hopetoun Room on Level 1
    CONFERENCE PROGRAM 6 - 8 December, Melbourne, Victoria Hosted by © Australian Archaeological Association Inc. Published by the Australian Archaeological Association Inc. ISBN: 978-0-646-98156-7 Printed by Conference Online. Citation details: J. Garvey, G. Roberts, C. Spry and J. Jerbic (eds) 2017 Island to Inland: Connections Across Land and Sea: Conference Handbook. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Archaeological Association Inc. Contents Contents Welcome 4 Conference Organising Committee 5 Volunteers 5 Sponsors 6 Getting Around Melbourne 8 Conference Information 10 Venue Floor Plan 11 Instructions for Session Convenors 12 Instructions for Presenters 12 Instructions for Poster Presenters 12 Social Media Guide 13 Meetings 15 Social Functions 16 Post Conference Tours 17 Photo Competition 19 Awards and Prizes 20 Plenary Sessions 23 Concurrent Sessions 24 Poster Presentations 36 Program Summary 38 Detailed Program 41 Abstracts 51 Welcome Welcome We welcome you to the city of Melbourne for the 2017 Australian Archaeological Association Conference being hosted by La Trobe University, coinciding with its 50th Anniversary. We respectfully acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the Kulin Nation, a place now known by its European name of Melbourne. We pay respect to their Elders past and present, and all members of the community. Melbourne has always been an important meeting place. For thousands of years, the Wurundjeri, Boonwurrung, Taungurong, Dja Dja Wurrung and the Wathaurung people, who make up the Kulin Nation, met in this area for cultural events and activities. Our Conference theme: ‘Island to Inland: Connections Across Land and Sea’ was chosen to reflect the journey of the First Australians through Wallacea to Sahul. Since then, people have successfully adapted to life in the varied landscapes and environments that exist between the outer islands and arid interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Cave Dig Shows the Earliest Australians Enjoyed a Coastal Lifestyle 19 May 2017, by Sean Ulm
    Cave dig shows the earliest Australians enjoyed a coastal lifestyle 19 May 2017, by Sean Ulm followed had to make sea crossings of up to 90km to get here. The earliest landfall on the continent is now likely to be at least 50m below the present ocean. Until now we have known very little about these first coastal peoples. Three main excavation squares within Boodie Cave. Credit: Peter Veth, Author provided Archaeological excavations in a remote island cave off northwest Australia reveal incredible details of the early use by people of the continent's now- submerged coast. Out latest study reveals that at lower sea levels, this island was used as a hunting shelter between PhD student Fiona Hook at the Boodie Cave excavation. about 50,000 and 30,000 years ago, and then as a Credit: Kane Ditchfield residential base for family groups by 8,000 years ago. As the dates for the first Aboriginal arrival in Our research, published this week in Quaternary Australia are pushed back further and further, it is Science Reviews, begins to fill in some of these becoming clear how innovative the original gaps. colonists must have been. Island dig The earliest known archaeological sites so far reported are found in inland Australia, such as For the past five years an international team of 30 Warratyi rock shelter in the Flinders Ranges and scientists has been working in collaboration with Madjedbebe in Arnhem Land. These places are a the Buurabalayji Thalanyji Aboriginal Corporation long way from the sea, and were once even more and Kuruma Marthudunera Aboriginal Corporation so when past sea levels were lower and the coast on Boodie Cave, a deep limestone cave on the even more distant.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTER Doi:10.1038/Nature19365
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature19365 1 Late Pleistocene climate drivers of early human 2 migration Axel Timmermann1,2 & Tobias Friedrich1 On the basis of fossil and archaeological data it has been (Fig. 1b–d) during the Late Pleistocene (126–11 thousand years ago hypothesized that the exodus of Homo sapiens out of Africa and into (ka)) and the Holocene (11–0 ka). Every ~21 thousand years decreased Eurasia between ~50–120 thousand years ago occurred in several precession (Fig. 1a) and corresponding higher boreal summer insola- orbitally paced migration episodes1–4. Crossing vegetated pluvial tion intensified rainfall in northern Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and corridors from northeastern Africa into the Arabian Peninsula the Levant8, thus generating habitable savannah-type corridors1,2 for and the Levant and expanding further into Eurasia, Australia H. sapiens and a possible exchange pathway between African and and the Americas, early H. sapiens experienced massive time- Eurasian populations, which in turn impacted the subsequent global varying climate and sea level conditions on a variety of timescales. dispersal pattern and gene flow of H. sapiens across Asia, Europe, Hitherto it has remained difficult to quantify the effect of glacial- Australia and into the Americas. and millennial-scale climate variability on early human dispersal Elucidating the response of H. sapiens dispersal to past climate shifts and evolution. Here we present results from a numerical human has been hindered by the sparseness of palaeoenvironmental data in dispersal model, which is forced by spatiotemporal estimates of key regions4 such as northeastern Africa, the Levant and the Arabian climate and sea level changes over the past 125 thousand years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Townsville's Early Success: the Engendered Cultural Landscape of Hervey Range and the Community 'At Its Foot'
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following reference: Clarkson, Marianne (2015) The road to Townsville's early success: the engendered cultural landscape of Hervey Range and the community 'at its foot'. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/47734/ The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owner of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please contact [email protected] and quote http://researchonline.jcu.edu.au/47734/ The Road to Townsville’s Early Success: The engendered cultural landscape of Hervey Range and the community ‘at its foot’ Marianne Clarkson (BA Hons, MB ChB, FRACGP) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at James Cook University College of Arts, Society and Education August 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisors Nigel and Shelley for their interest in the initial ideas for the thesis and for their support through the long five years of its completion. Nigel’s willingness to conduct the honour’s student’s field school at the site each year made this entire project feasible and without his help we would not have discovered as much as we have. I also thank them for all their feedback on the drafts for the chapters and for their advice on how to structure the thesis as a whole. I would also like to thank Townsville City Council, who own the land on which this research was conducted, for their permission to carry out the work and for the help from Ted Bundi, the local Heritage Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did Homo Sapiens First Reach Southeast Asia and Sahul?
    PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE When did Homo sapiens first reach Southeast Asia and Sahul? James F. O’Connella,1, Jim Allenb, Martin A. J. Williamsc, Alan N. Williamsd,e, Chris S. M. Turneyf,g, Nigel A. Spoonerh,i, Johan Kammingaj, Graham Brownk,l,m, and Alan Cooperg,n Edited by Richard G. Klein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and approved July 5, 2018 (received for review May 31, 2018) Anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens, AMH) began spreading across Eurasia from Africa and adjacent Southwest Asia about 50,000–55,000 years ago (ca.50–55 ka). Some have argued that human genetic, fossil, and archaeological data indicate one or more prior dispersals, possibly as early as 120 ka. A recently reported age estimate of 65 ka for Madjedbebe, an archaeological site in northern Sahul (Pleistocene Australia–New Guinea), if correct, offers what might be the strongest support yet presented for a pre–55-ka African AMH exodus. We review evidence for AMH arrival on an arc spanning South China through Sahul and then evaluate data from Madjedbebe. We find that an age estimate of >50 ka for this site is unlikely to be valid. While AMH may have moved far beyond Africa well before 50–55 ka, data from the region of interest offered in support of this idea are not compelling. Homo sapiens | anatomically modern humans | Late Pleistocene | Madjedbebe | Sahul Fossil data suggest that the modern human lineage Advocates envision a stepwise spread in at least two appeared in Africa by 300 ka (1). There is broad but not stages, the first across southern Eurasia and another universal agreement that near-modern or modern hu- much later into higher latitudes, including Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Minjiwarra: Archaeological Evidence of Human Occupation of Australia's
    Australian Archaeology ISSN: 0312-2417 (Print) 2470-0363 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raaa20 Minjiwarra: archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP Peter Veth, Kane Ditchfield, Mark Bateman, Sven Ouzman, Marine Benoit, Ana Paula Motta, Darrell Lewis, Sam Harper & Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation To cite this article: Peter Veth, Kane Ditchfield, Mark Bateman, Sven Ouzman, Marine Benoit, Ana Paula Motta, Darrell Lewis, Sam Harper & Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation (2019): Minjiwarra: archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP, Australian Archaeology, DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2019.1650479 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2019.1650479 Published online: 19 Aug 2019. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=raaa20 AUSTRALIAN ARCHAEOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/03122417.2019.1650479 ARTICLE Minjiwarra: archaeological evidence of human occupation of Australia’s northern Kimberley by 50,000 BP Peter Vetha,b,c , Kane Ditchfielda , Mark Batemand,SvenOuzmana, Marine Benoita, a e a à Ana Paula Motta , Darrell Lewis , Sam Harper and Balanggarra Aboriginal Corporation aArchaeology and the Centre for Rock art Research þ Management, M257, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Business and Law, The University of Western Australia, Crawley,
    [Show full text]