DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigations of Future Expendable Launcher Options

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigations of Future Expendable Launcher Options IAC-11-D2.4.8 Investigations of Future Expendable Launcher Options Martin Sippel, Etienne Dumont, Ingrid Dietlein [email protected] Tel. +49-421-24420145, Fax. +49-421-24420150 Space Launcher Systems Analysis (SART), DLR, Bremen, Germany The paper summarizes recent system study results on future European expendable launcher options investigated by DLR-SART. In the first part two variants of storable propellant upper segments are presented which could be used as a future evolvement of the small Vega launcher. The lower composite consisting of upgraded P100 and Z40 motors is assumed to be derived from Vega. An advanced small TSTO rocket with a payload capability in the range of 1500 kg in higher energy orbits and up to 3000 kg supported by additional strap-on boosters is further under study. The first stage consists of a high pressure solid motor with a fiber casing while the upper stage is using cryogenic propellants. Synergies with other ongoing European development programs are to be exploited. The so called NGL should serve a broad payload class range from 3 to 8 tons in GTO reference orbit by a flexible arrangement of stages and strap-on boosters. The recent SART work focused on two and three-stage vehicles with cryogenic and solid propellants. The paper presents the promises and constraints of all investigated future launcher configurations. Nomenclature TSTO Two Stage to Orbit VEGA Vettore Europeo di Generazione Avanzata D Drag N VENUS VEGA New Upper Stage Isp (mass) specific Impulse s (N s / kg) cog center of gravity M Mach-number - sep separation T Thrust N W weight N g gravity acceleration m/s2 1 INTRODUCTION m mass kg Two new launchers, Soyuz and Vega, are scheduled to q dynamic pressure Pa enter operation in the coming months at the Kourou v velocity m/s spaceport, increasing the range of missions able to be α angle of attack - launched by Western Europe. Nevertheless, continuous improvement of the launch vehicles is necessary in the γ flight path angle - future which requires starting such investigations already today. Subscripts, Abbreviations DLR’s launcher analysis group SART is focusing its AP Ammonium Perchlorate research on a few promising development lines. Some AVUM Attitude and Vernier Upper Module (of concepts have been studied jointly with industry; other VEGA) investigations are carried-out independently by internal DLR funding. CAD Computer Aided Design ELV Expendable Launch Vehicle A DLR space agency funded study called VENUS is GLOW Gross Lift-Off Mass looking at future upgrades of Vega. This analysis is now GNC Guidance, Navigation, Control focusing on three and four stage configurations based on GTO Geostationary Transfer Orbit solid rocket motors for the lower stages and on different HTPB Hydroxyl Terminated Poly Butadiene storable liquid propellant upper stages. ISS International Space Station Another interesting, simpler concept is currently studied LEO Low Earth Orbit by SART, namely a two-stage to orbit launch vehicle LH2 Liquid Hydrogen (TSTO) making use of synergies by implementing stage LOX Liquid Oxygen or component hardware already existing or under MEOP Maximum Expected Operating Pressure development. This approach should reduce development MMH Monomethyl Hydrazine cost, but even more importantly, promises to raise MR Mixture Ratio production numbers of components and thus decrease MTO Medium Transfer Orbit manufacturing cost and enhance quality. The studied NGL Next/New Generation Launcher TSTO configurations, which aim for a performance range in-between Vega and Ariane 5, are all based on a SI Structural Index (m / m ) dry propellant solid rocket motor for the first stage and a cryogenic SRM Solid Rocket Motor liquid propellant upper stage with VINCI engine SSO Sun Synchronous Orbit currently under development for Ariane 5 ME. TRL Technology Readiness Level Copyright © 2011 by DLR-SART. Published for the 62nd International Astronautical Congress, Cape Town, SA. 1 Under the terms “NGL” and “Ariane 6” a still somehow turned out to be the one with lowest structural weight to nebulous future medium lift launcher configuration is be placed inside a long cylindrical interstage. A sphere investigated in Europe within ESA’s FLPP research of 2.19 m diameter is intersected by a cone containing program and in France by CNES and industrial the N2O4 with the MMH in the remaining sphere- contractors. This launcher with a potential GTO payload section volume. This innovative design allows for a capability range between 2 and 8 tons has also been highly efficient structure because short cylinder independently investigated by DLR-SART and elements with relatively heavy dome connections can be preliminary results are presented here. avoided. However, processes for a cost efficient manufacturing and quality assurance of this design All presented payload performance data consider the de- could become challenging. orbitation of the upper stage after final injection in order to avoid their uncontrolled reentry or the generation of The payload performance of the VENUS II 3-stage new space debris. launcher in a polar orbit could reach about 2200 kg and 3100 kg into an ISS-LEO inclined 51.6 degrees. These Note that all presented launcher concepts are under values are several hundred kilograms above what is to investigation to obtain a better understanding of future be expected for Vega. With its GLOW between 162.4 ELV options. Study results should support Germany’s and 163.2 Mg the payload fraction is in the range 1.35% preparations of the European ministerial council 2012. to 1.9%. For none of the launchers, even the most promising ones, is a development decision currently implicated. Table 1: Characteristic calculated performance data of small launcher upper stage engine options 2 VENUS II AESTUS 2 BERTA The small launcher VEGA with an advanced solid 55 8 propellant first stage, P80, will become operational vacuum thrust kN soon. VEGA consists of three solid rocket motors and a vacuum spec. impulse s 336.4 321.3 small liquid propulsion module for precise orbit chamber pressure bar 60 15 injection called AVUM. Germany is not participating in ENGINE SIZE this launcher development project. total engine length m 2.171 1.194 Already in 2007 DLR and Astrium started looking into a nozzle exit diameter m 1.361 0.65 potential upper stage evolvement and performance nozzle expansion ratio - 280 ca. 110 upgrade of the VEGA launcher in a study called VENUS (references [1] through [4]). A second iteration of VENUS has been initiated in July 2009 which ran through June 2011 and focused on options for storable liquid upper stages in a small launcher. A comprehensive overview on the results of VENUS II is presented in [5]. This study considers in particular a 3-stage and a 4-stage configuration based on solid rocket motors for the lower stages and different storable liquid propellant upper stages. DLR has been involved in the preliminary sizing of the launchers, organization of concurrent engineering design sessions run in DLR’s Concurrent Engineering Facility (CEF) in Bremen, and all performance and trajectory optimization. Astrium, as prime contractor, has been responsible for the pro- pulsion system definition and conceptual design and the upper stages’ mechanical and functional architecture. Both small launcher configurations investigated in VENUS II use the P100 solid motor as the first stage which is a derivative of the P80 of Vega with increased propellant loading. The three stage vehicle (sketch in Figure 1) further consists of a new second stage called Z40 which is a proposed evolution of the Z23 motor of Vega. It is characterized by increased fuel mass of almost 40 tons and a longer combustion time in comparison to Z23. The storable propellant upper stage with the proposed turbopump fed MMH-N2O4 engine AESTUS 2 (Table 1) has been slightly redefined in VENUS II compared to similar launcher arrangements studied in the first loop of VENUS (see [2, 3]!). Various Figure 1: Sketch of VENUS II three-stage launcher fuel tank layouts all with optimal 5400 kg propellant configuration with Aestus II engine in upper stage loading have been explored in preliminary sizing. From a comprehensive trade-off the spherical conical type IAC-11-D2.4.8 2 The VENUS 4-stage configuration shown in Figure 2 3 ADVANCED SMALL TSTO LAUNCHER resembles more the shape and architecture of Vega. The need for a performance upgrade of VEGA and the Three solid motors (P100+Z23+Z9A) are completed by simplification of the overall lay-out combined with a a storable liquid propellant upper stage intended to reduction in the total number of stages has been the replace the current AVUM. Investigations on a suitable major driver in the study of an advanced small engine which does not yet exist in Europe have been expendable TSTO launcher. Six different liquid engine performed with several trade-offs on the thrust level, options with three different propellant combinations chamber pressure, and combustion chamber cooling have been analyzed by SART. One major result concept [5]. The selected pressure-fed engine should published in [1, 2, 3] is the strong interest in a achieve 8 kN of thrust and has been dubbed BERTA combination of a solid first stage and a cryogenic upper (see data in Table 1). stage. This small TSTO has the additional advantage of being very compact and having the shortest length of all A similar upper stage spherical-conical tank architecture investigated versions presented in [1, 4]. as for the 3-stage vehicle has been selected but with 1700 kg MMH/N2O4 propellant instead of 580 kg The preliminary design and more detailed investigation UDMH/N2O4 in AVUM. The calculated structural of such an advanced small TSTO was initiated at DLR index of this L1.7, however, is unfavorably impacted by early in 2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-173 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber ? ? ? Daniel Eiringhaus †, Daniel Rahn‡, Hendrik Riedmann , Oliver Knab and Oskar Haidn‡ ?ArianeGroup Robert-Koch-Straße 1, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany ‡Institute of Turbomachinery and Flight Propulsion (LTF), Technische Universität München (TUM) Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany [email protected] †Corresponding author Abstract For future liquid rocket engines methane has become the focus of several studies on alternative fuels in the western hemisphere. At ArianeGroup numerical simulation tools have been established as a powerful instrument in the design process. In order to achieve the same confidence level for CH4/O2 as for H2/O2 combustion, the applied numerical models have to be adapted and validated against sufficient test data. At the Chair of Space Propulsion at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) several combustion cham- bers have been designed and tests at different operating points have been conducted. In this paper one of these subscale combustion chambers with calorimetric cooling and seven shear coaxial injection elements running on gaseous methane and oxygen is used to examine ArianeGroup’s in-house tools for combustion chamber performance analysis. 1. Introduction Current development programs in many space-faring nations focus on launchers utilizing a propellant combination of liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid methane (CH4). In Europe, hydrocarbons have been identified as an alternative fuel in the frame of the Future Launcher Preparatory Programme (FLPP).14, 23 Major industrial development of methane / oxy- gen rocket engines is ongoing in the United States at SpaceX with the Raptor engine (staged combustion), at Blue Origin with the BE-4 engine (staged combustion) and in Europe at ArianeGroup with the Prometheus engine (gas gen- erator).
    [Show full text]
  • Qualification Over Ariane's Lifetime
    r bulletin 94 — may 1998 Qualification Over Ariane’s Lifetime A. González Blázquez Directorate of Launchers, ESA, Paris M. Eymard Groupe Programme CNES/Arianespace, Evry, France Introduction Similarly, the RL10 engine on the Centaur stage The primary objectives of the qualification of the Atlas launcher has been the subject of an activities performed during the operational ongoing improvement programme. About 5000 lifetime of a launcher are: tests were performed before the first flight, and – to verify the qualification status of the vehicle 4000 during the subsequent ten years. – to resolve any technical problems relating to subsystem operations on the ground or in On-going qualification activities of a similar flight. nature were started for the Ariane-3 and 4 launchers in 1986, and for Ariane-5 in 1996. Before focussing on the European family of They can be classified into two main launchers, it is perhaps informative to review categories: ‘regular’ and ‘one-off’. just one or two of the US efforts in the area of solid and liquid propulsion in order to put the Ariane-3/4 accompanying activities Ariane-related activities into context. Regular activities These activities are mainly devoted to In principle, the development programme for a launcher ends with the verification of the qualification status of the qualification phase, after which it enters operational service. In various launcher subsystems. They include the practice, however, the assessment of a launcher’s reliability is a following work packages: continuing process and qualification-type activities proceed, as an – Periodic sampling of engines: one HM7 and extension of the development programme (as is done in aeronautics), one Viking per year, tested to the limits of the over the course of the vehicle’s lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Thrust In-Space Liquid Propulsion Stage: Storable Propellants
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institute of Transport Research:Publications Space Propulsion 2014 – ID 2968378 High-Thrust in-Space Liquid Propulsion Stage: Storable Propellants Etienne Dumont, Alexander Kopp, Carina Ludwig, Nicole Garbers DLR, Space Launcher Systems Analysis (SART), Bremen, Germany [email protected] Abstract In the frame of a project funded by ESA, a consortium led Subscripts, Abbreviations by Avio in cooperation with Snecma, Cira, and DLR is ATV Automated Transfer Vehicle performing the preliminary design of a High-Thrust in- CDF Concurrent Design Facility Space Liquid Propulsion Stage for two different types of ECSS European Cooperation on Space manned missions beyond Earth orbit. For these missions, Standardization one or two 100 ton stages are to be used to propel a Elec assy electronic assembly manned vehicle. Three different propellant combinations; EPS Etage à propergols stockables (Ariane 5’s LOx/LH2, LOx/CH4 and MON-3/MMH are being storable propellant stage) compared. GNC Guidance Navigation and Control HTS High-Thrust Stage The preliminary design of the storable variant (MON- IF Interface 3/MMH) has been performed by DLR. The Aestus II ISS International Space Station engine with a large nozzle expansion ratio has been LEO Low Earth Orbit chosen as baseline. A first iteration has demonstrated, that LEOP Launch and Early Orbit Phase it indeed provides the best performance for the storable LH2 Liquid Hydrogen propellant combination, when considering all engines LOx Liquid Oxygen available today or which may be available in a short- to MLI Multi-Layer Insulation medium term.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140002716 2019-08-29T14:36:45+00:00Z Liquid Propulsion Systems – Evolution & Advancements Launch Vehicle Propulsion & Systems LPTC Liquid Propulsion Technical Committee Rick Ballard Liquid Engine Systems Lead SLS Liquid Engines Office NASA / MSFC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted, unless for course participation and to a paid course student, in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AIAA and/or course instructor. Contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Professional Development Program, Suite 500, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4344 Modules 1. Rocket Propulsion Fundamentals 2. LRE Applications 3. Liquid Propellants 4. Engine Power Cycles 5. Engine Components Module 1: Rocket Propulsion TOPICS Fundamentals • Thrust • Specific Impulse • Mixture Ratio • Isp vs. MR • Density vs. Isp • Propellant Mass vs. Volume Warning: Contents deal with math, • Area Ratio physics and thermodynamics. Be afraid…be very afraid… Terms A Area a Acceleration F Force (thrust) g Gravity constant (32.2 ft/sec2) I Impulse m Mass P Pressure Subscripts t Time a Ambient T Temperature c Chamber e Exit V Velocity o Initial state r Reaction ∆ Delta / Difference s Stagnation sp Specific ε Area Ratio t Throat or Total γ Ratio of specific heats Thrust (1/3) Rocket thrust can be explained using Newton’s 2nd and 3rd laws of motion. 2nd Law: a force applied to a body is equal to the mass of the body and its acceleration in the direction of the force.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download
    www.arianespace.com www.starsem.com www.avio Arianespace’s eighth launch of 2021 with the fifth Soyuz of the year will place its satellite passengers into low Earth orbit. The launcher will be carrying a total payload of approximately 5 518 kg. The launch will be performed from Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. MISSION DESCRIPTION 2 ONEWEB SATELLITES 3 Liftoff is planned on at exactly: SOYUZ LAUNCHER 4 06:23 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, 10:23 p.m. Universal time (UTC), LAUNCH CAMPAIGN 4 00:23 a.m. Paris time, FLIGHT SEQUENCES 5 01:23 a.m. Moscow time, 03:23 a.m. Baikonur Cosmodrome. STAKEHOLDERS OF A LAUNCH 6 The nominal duration of the mission (from liftoff to separation of the satellites) is: 3 hours and 45 minutes. Satellites: OneWeb satellite #255 to #288 Customer: OneWeb • Altitude at separation: 450 km Cyrielle BOUJU • Inclination: 84.7degrees [email protected] +33 (0)6 32 65 97 48 RUAG Space AB (Linköping, Sweden) is the prime contractor in charge of development and production of the dispenser system used on Flight ST34. It will carry the satellites during their flight to low Earth orbit and then release them into space. The dedicated dispenser is designed to Flight ST34, the 29th commercial mission from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan performed by accommodate up to 36 spacecraft per launch, allowing Arianespace and its Starsem affiliate, will put 34 of OneWeb’s satellites bringing the total fleet to 288 satellites Arianespace to timely deliver the lion’s share of the initial into a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 450 kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015152450 Presentation-Airbus
    Accès Européen à l’Espace, pourquoi Ariane 6 et Airbus Safran Launchers ? Assemblée Générale ISAE 11/06/2015 H. GILIBERT – CTO - Airbus Safran Launchers 1 Eléments de contexte This document is the property of Airbus Safran Launchers. It shall be not communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Airbus Safran Launchers Holding/SAS/GmbH. All rights reserved. Janvier 2015 2 Le contexte des lanceurs spatiaux en Europe • Les lanceurs spatiaux servent avant tout la Garantie de l’Accès Stratégique à l’Espace pour les Etats Européens. • L’activité est supportée par les Etats Membres de l’Agence Spatiale Européenne (esa). • Quelques lancements institutionnels à l’année (essentiellement avec VEGA, et SOYOUZ actuellement). • L’économie de la filière est rendue supportable pour les Etats Européens par la capture de lancements commerciaux, qui assurent la récurrence de production et forcent à la compétitivité. • Ariane 5 (6 à 7 lancements par an) réalise > 80 % de ses lancements sur le marché commercial (leader mondial ~50 % du marché ouvert). This document is the property of Airbus Safran Launchers. It shall be not communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Airbus Safran Launchers Holding/SAS/GmbH. All rights reserved. janvier 2015 3 L’activité Lancements Spatiaux dans le monde This document is the property of Airbus Safran Launchers. It shall be not communicated to third parties without prior written agreement. Its content shall not be disclosed. Airbus Safran Launchers Holding/SAS/GmbH. All rights reserved. janvier 2015 4 Les évolutions du marché des lancements (1/2) Les « moyens à gros » Les lancements sur le marché commercial sont essentiels pour soutenir l’Accès Européen Autonome à l’Espace Apparition de satellites à propulsion électrique, plus légers -> modifiera peu à peu les besoins mission sur la décennie à venir.
    [Show full text]
  • Variations of Solid Rocket Motor Preliminary Design for Small TSTO Launcher
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institute of Transport Research:Publications Space Propulsion 2012 – ID 2394102 Variations of Solid Rocket Motor Preliminary Design for Small TSTO launcher Etienne Dumont Space Launcher Systems Analysis (SART), DLR, Bremen, Germany [email protected] NGL New/Next Generation Launcher Abstract SI Structural Index (mdry / mpropellant) Several combinations of solid rocket motors and ignition SRM Solid Rocket Motor strategies have been considered for a small Two Stage to TSTO Two Stage To Orbit Orbit (TSTO) launch vehicle based on a big solid rocket US Upper Stage motor first stage and cryogenic upper stage propelled by VENUS Vega New Upper Stage the Vinci engine. In order to reach the target payload avg average during the flight performance of about 1400 kg into GTO for the clean s.l. sea level version and 2700 to 3000 kg for the boosted version, the vac vacuum influence of the selected solid rocket motors on the upper 2 + 2 P23 4 P23: two ignited on ground and two with a stage structure has been studied. Preliminary structural delayed ignition designs have been performed and the thrust histories of the solid rocket motor have been tweaked to limit the upper stage structural mass. First stage and booster 1. Introduction combinations with acceptable general loads are proposed. Solid rocket motors (SRM) are commonly used for boosters or launcher first stage. Indeed they can provide high thrust levels while being compact, light and Nomenclature relatively simple compared to a liquid rocket engine Isp specific impulse s providing the same thrust level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z
    Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 1 Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal Edición 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Los Motores Aeroespaciales, A-Z (The Aerospace En- gines, A-Z) Versión 12 2018 por Ricardo Miguel Vidal * * * -MOTOR: Máquina que transforma en movimiento la energía que recibe. (sea química, eléctrica, vapor...) Sponsored by L’Aeroteca - BARCELONA ISBN 978-84-608-7523-9 Este facsímil es < aeroteca.com > Depósito Legal B 9066-2016 ORIGINAL si la Título: Los Motores Aeroespaciales A-Z. © página anterior tiene Parte/Vers: 1/12 Página: 2 el sello con tinta Autor: Ricardo Miguel Vidal VERDE Edición: 2018-V12 = Rev. 01 Presentación de la edición 2018-V12 (Incluye todas las anteriores versiones y sus Apéndices) La edición 2003 era una publicación en partes que se archiva en Binders por el propio lector (2,3,4 anillas, etc), anchos o estrechos y del color que desease durante el acopio parcial de la edición. Se entregaba por grupos de hojas impresas a una cara (edición 2003), a incluir en los Binders (archivadores). Cada hoja era sustituíble en el futuro si aparecía una nueva misma hoja ampliada o corregida. Este sistema de anillas admitia nuevas páginas con información adicional. Una hoja con adhesivos para portada y lomo identifi caba cada volumen provisional. Las tapas defi nitivas fueron metálicas, y se entregaraban con el 4 º volumen. O con la publicación completa desde el año 2005 en adelante. -Las Publicaciones -parcial y completa- están protegidas legalmente y mediante un sello de tinta especial color VERDE se identifi can los originales.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics
    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures
    Launch Vehicle Control Center Architectures Michael D. Watson1, Amy Epps2, and Van Woodruff3 NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 Michael Jacob Vachon4 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058 Julio Monreal5 European Space Agency, Launchers Directorate, Paris, France Marl Levesque6 United Launch Alliance, Vandenberg AFB and Randall Williams7 and Tom McLaughlin8 Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA 90245 Launch vehicles within the international community vary greatly in their configuration and processing. Each launch site has a unique processing flow based on the specific launch vehicle configuration. Launch and flight operations are managed through a set of control centers associated with each launch site. Each launch site has a control center for launch operations; however flight operations support varies from being co-located with the launch site to being shared with the space vehicle control center. There is also a nuance of some having an engineering support center which may be co-located with either the launch or flight control center, or in a separate geographical location altogether. A survey of control center architectures is presented for various launch vehicles including the NASA Space Launch System (SLS), United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V and Delta IV, and the European Space Agency (ESA) Ariane 5. Each of these control center architectures shares some similarities in basic structure while differences in functional distribution also exist. The driving functions which lead to these factors are considered and a model of control center architectures is proposed which supports these commonalities and variations. I. INTRODUCTION Launch vehicles in both Europe and the United States have been operating successfully for several decades.
    [Show full text]