DOCSLIB.ORG

Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff PART 4 - Exchange Access Services SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas Original Sheet No. 1 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS The following is a list of exchanges having Extended Area Service to other Indiana Bell Telephone Company and Connecting Company exchanges: Extended Extended Exchange Service Area Exchange Service Area Acton Bargersville(C.C.) Alexandria Anderson Cumberland Chesterfield Fairland Elwood Fishers Frankton(C.C.) Fortville(C.C.) Gaston Franklin(C.C.) Summitville Greenfield Yorktown Greenwood Indianapolis Maxwell(C.C.) McCordsville(C.C.) New Palestine Oaklandon West Newton Amboy Bunker Hill Whiteland(C.C.) Converse Greentown Kokomo Marion Peru Swayzee(C.C.) Albany Dunkirk(C.C.) Sweetser(C.C.) Eaton Muncie (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange Material formerly appeared in T-8 Tariff, Part 3, Sheet 1. Effective: July 19, 1995 N. L. Cubellis Vice President-Regulatory INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff 1st Revised Sheet No. 2 PART 4 - Exchange Access Services Cancels SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas Original Sheet No. 2 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS (Cont'd) Extended Extended Exchange Service Area Exchange Service Area Anderson Alexandria Bedford Heltonville Chesterfield Mitchell(C.C.) Elwood Orleans(C.C.) Frankton(C.C.) Trinity-Williams(C.C.)/1/ Gaston Lapel(C.C.) Markleville(C.C.) Mechanicsburg(C.C.) Middleton Muncie Bloomfield Linton Pendleton(C.C.) Lyons(C.C.) Perkinsville(C.C.) Owensburg(C.C.) Summitville Stanford(C.C.) Yorktown Worthington(C.C.) Andrews Huntington Lagro Reservoir(C.C.) Bloomington Ellettsville(C.C.) Lake Monroe(C.C.) Nashville Smithville(C.C.) Attica Covington Stanford(C.C.) Mellott Oxford Stewart Veedersburg West Lebanon Bluffton Craigville(C.C.) West Point(C.C.) Liberty Center(C.C.) Wingate(C.C.) Markle(C.C.) Petroleum(C.C.) Tocsin(C.C.) Auburn Butler(C.C.) St. Joe(C.C.) Spencerville Waterloo(C.C.) /1/ Formerly Trinity Springs and Williams (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange Effective: October 1, 1996 By N. L. Cubellis, Vice-President-Regulatory INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. AT&T PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff 1st Revised Sheet No. 3 PART 4 - Exchange Access Services Cancels SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas Original Sheet No. 3 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS (cont'd) EXTENDED EXTENDED EXCHANGE SERVICE AREA EXCHANGE SERVICE AREA Boonville Chandler Buck Creek Battle Ground(C.C.) Elberfeld(C.C.) Brookston(C.C.) Evansville/1/ (T) Delphi(C.C.) Lynnville(C.C.) Lafayette(C.C.) McCutchanville Mulberry(C.C.) Newburgh Rossville(C.C.) Tennyson Boswell Fowler Bunker Hill Amboy Oxford Converse (N) Stewart Kokomo Peru Brownsburg Carmel Burlington Cutler(C.C.) Clayton(C.C.) Deer Creek(C.C.) Danville Flora(C.C.) Indianapolis Geetingsville(C.C.) Lizton(C.C.) Kokomo Mooresville Michigantown Pittsboro(C.C.) Russiaville Plainfield West Newton Carmel Brownsburg Whitestown(C.C.) Cumberland Zionsville Fishers Fortville(C.C.) Bruceville Vincennes Indianapolis Westport, IL.(CC) Maxwell(C.C.) McCordsville(C.C.) Noblesville Oaklandon Pittsboro(C.C.) Westfield(C.C.) Whitestown(C.C.) Zionsville (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange (T) /1/ Evansville exchange includes Dade Park, Kentucky Effective: March 9, 2006 By J. B. Butler, Vice President - Regulatory INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff 2nd Revised Sheet No. 4 PART 4 - Exchange Access Services Cancels SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas 1st Revised Sheet No. 4 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS (cont'd) EXTENDED SERVICE EXTENDED SERVICE EXCHANGE AREA EXCHANGE AREA Cayuga Covington Charlottesville Greenfield Dana/1/ Knightstown(C.C.) Kingman Maxwell(C.C.) Montezuma Chesterfield Alexandria Cedar Lake Crown Point Anderson Dyer Gaston East Chicago Middletown Gary Muncie Hammond Yorktown Highland Lowel Merrillville Chrisney Dale St. John Lamar(C.C.) Whiting Rockport Sandridge Santa Claus(C.C.) Chandler Boonville Tennyson (T) Elberfeld(C.C.) Evansville/2/ McCutchanville Clinton Dana/1/ Newburgh Montezuma Rockville Rosedale Charlestown Galena Terre Haute(C.C.) Henryville(C.C.) LaGrange, Ky.(C.C.) Louisville, Ky.(C.C.) Columbus Edinburg New Albany/3/ Elizabethtown New Washington Flat Rock Sellersburg Hope West Point, Ky.(C.C.) Zoneton, Ky. (C.C.) (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange /1/ Dana exchange includes West Dana, Illinois. /2/ Evansville exchange includes Dade Park, Kentucky. /3/ New Albany exchange includes Jeffersonville. Effective: March 15, 1999 By C. K. Wooley, Vice-President - Regulatory INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. AT&T PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff 4th Revised Sheet No. 5 PART 4 - Exchange Access Services Cancels SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas 3rd Revised Sheet No. 5 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS (cont'd) EXTENDED EXTENDED EXCHANGE SERVICE AREA EXCHANGE SERVICE AREA Converse Amboy Culver No Extended Service Bunker Hill (N) Greentown Cumberland Acton Kokomo (N) Carmel Marion Fairland Peru (N) Fishers Swayzee(C.C.) Fortville(C.C.) Sweetser(C.C.) Greenfield Greenwood Covington Attica Indianapolis Cayuga Maxwell(C.C.) Kingman McCordsville(C.C.) Veedersburg New Palestine West Lebanon Oaklandon Whiteland(C.C.) Crawfordsville Darlington Ladoga Dale Chrisney Linden(C.C.) Holland(C.C.) New Market Lamar(C.C.) New Ross(C.C.) Rockport Roachdale(C.C.) St. Meinrad(C.C.) Waveland Sandridge Waynetown Santa Claus(C.C.) Wingate(C.C.) Tennyson Crown Point Cedar Lake Dana/1/ Cayuga Dyer Clinton East Chicago Montezuma Gary Hammond Highland Lakes of the Four Seasons(C.C.) Lowell Merrillville St. John Whiting (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange /1/ Dana exchange includes West Dana, Illinois. Effective: March 9, 2006 By J. B. Butler, Vice President - Regulatory INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff 1st Revised Sheet No. 6 PART 4 - Exchange Access Services Cancels SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas Original Sheet No. 6 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS (cont'd) (T) EXTENDED SERVICE EXTENDED SERVICE EXCHANGE AREA EXCHANGE AREA Danville Brownsburg /1/ East Chicago Calumet City,IL(C.C.) (T) Clayton(C.C.) Cedar Lake (C) Indianapolis Crown Point (C) Jamestown(C.C.) Dyer Lizton(C.C.) Gary Monrovia(C.C.) Hammond Mooresville Highland Pittsboro(C.C.) Lansing,IL(C.C.) (T) Plainfiled Lowell (C) West Newton Merrillville St. John (C) Whiting Darlington Clarks Hill(C.C.) Colfax(C.C.) Crawfordsville Eaton Albany Linden(C.C.) Dunkirk(C.C.) New Ross(C.C.) Gaston Thorntown(C.C.) Hartford City Wingate(C.C.) /1/ Muncie Upland Yorktown Dugger Jasonville Linton Edinburg Bargersville(C.C.) Columbus Dyer Cedar Lake Elizabethtown Crown Point (C) Flat Rock East Chicago Franklin(C.C.) Gary (C) Hope Hammond Marietta(C.C.) Highland Nineveh(C.C.) Lowell (C) Trafalgar(C.C.) Merrillville Whiteland(C.C.) St. John Whiting (C) /2/ (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange /1/ Material formerly appeared on Original Sheet No. 5 in this Section. /2/ Material now appears on 1st Revised Sheet No. 7 in this Section. Effective: February 14, 1999 By C. K. Wooley, Vice-President - Regulatory INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff 1st Revised Sheet No. 7 PART 4 - Exchange Access Services Cancels SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas Original Sheet No. 7 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS (cont'd) (T) EXTENDED SERVICE EXTENDED SERVICE EXCHANGE AREA EXCHANGE AREA Elizabethtown Columbus /2/Fairland Acton /2/ Edinburg Bargersville(C.C.) Flat Rock Cumberland Hope Franklin(C.C.) Greenfield Greenwood Elwood Alexandria Indianapolis Anderson Marietta(C.C.) Fairmount(C.C.) Maxwell(C.C.) Frankton(C.C.) New Palestine Summitville Shelbyville Tipton(C.C.) Whiteland(C.C.) /2/ Windfall(C.C.) Fishers Acton Evansville/1/ Boonville (T) Carmel Chandler Cumberland Elberfeld(C.C) Fortville(C.C.) McCutchanville Greenfield Mt. Vernon Indianapolis New Harmony Maxwell(C.C.) Newburgh McCordsville(C.C.) St. Joseph New Palestine St. Philip /2/ Noblesville Oaklandon Westfield(C.C.) Whitestown(C.C.) Zionville /3/ (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange /1/ Evansville exchange includes Dade Park, Kentucky. /2/ Material formerly appeared on Original Sheet No. 6 in this Section. /3/ Material now appears on 1st Revised Sheet No. 8 in this Section. Effective: February 14, 1999 By C. K. Wooley, Vice-President - Regulatory INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 4 SECTION 1 Tariff 1st Revised Sheet No. 8 PART 4 - Exchange Access Services Cancels SECTION 1 - Exchange Service Areas Original Sheet No. 8 LIST OF EXCHANGE AREAS AND LOCAL CALLING AREAS (cont'd) (T) EXTENDED SERVICE EXTENDED SERVICE EXCHANGE AREA EXCHANGE AREA Flat Rock Columbus /2/ Gary Cedar Lake (C)/2/ Edinburg Dyer (C) Elizabethtown East Chicago Hope Crown Point (C) Marietta(C.C.) Hammond Shelbyville Highland Waldron(C.C.) Hobart(C.C.) Lake Station(C.C.) Lowell (C) Fowler Boswell Merrillville Otterbein Portage(C.C.) Oxford St. John (C) Whiting Frankfort Clarks Hill(C.C.) Gaston Alexandria Colfax(C.C.) Anderson Geetingsville(C.C.) Chesterfiled Kirklin Eaton Mechanicsburg Muncie Michigantown Summitville Mulberry(C.C.) Upland Thorntown(C.C.) Yorktown /2/ Galena Charlestown Georgetown(C.C.) LaGrange, Ky.(C.C.) Lanesville(C.C.) Louisville,Ky.(C.C.) New Albany/1/ (T) Pekin(C.C.) Sellersburg West Point,Ky.(C.C.) Zoneton, Ky.(C.C.) /2/ /3/ (C.C.) Connecting Company Exchange /1/ New Albany exchange includes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before the Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of ) ) Section 63.71 Application of ) ) File No. Bellsouth Telecommunications, L
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Section 63.71 Application of ) ) File No. BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC ) Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC ) Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated ) Michigan Bell Telephone Company ) Nevada Bell Telephone Company ) Pacific Bell Telephone Company ) Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ) The Ohio Bell Telephone Company ) Wisconsin Bell, Inc. ) ) For Authority Pursuant to Section 214 of ) The Communications Act of 1934, As Amended, ) To Discontinue the Provision of Service ) SECTION 63.71 APPLICATION OF AT&T AT&T Services, Inc., on behalf of its affiliates, BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Alabama, AT&T Florida, AT&T Georgia, AT&T Kentucky, AT&T Louisiana, AT&T Mississippi, AT&T North Carolina, AT&T South Carolina, and AT&T Tennessee; Illinois Bell Telephone Company, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Illinois; Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Incorporated, d/b/a AT&T Indiana; Michigan Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Michigan; Nevada Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Nevada; Pacific Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T California; Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Arkansas, AT&T Kansas, AT&T Missouri, AT&T Oklahoma, and AT&T Texas; The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Ohio; and Wisconsin Bell, Inc., d/b/a AT&T Wisconsin, (collectively referred to herein as “AT&T”) applies for authority under Section 214(a) of the Communications Act, as amended (“the Act”), 47 U.S.C. § 214, and Section 63.71 of the Federal Communications Commission’s (“Commission”) rules, 47 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • AT&T Benefits
    GET STARTED CONTACT INFO Where to go for COPIES AND CLAIMS more information Important Benefits Contacts � January 2017 OTHER NIN: 78-39607 Please keep this document for future reference GET STARTED Contents Important Information This document is a one-stop reference guide Distribution About this document Distributed to all employees and Agent for service of process for frequently called numbers, websites and other eligible former employees How do I look up a contact (including LTD recipients) of all important AT&T benefits contact information. AT&T companies (excluding CONTACT INFO employees of AT&T Support Services Company, Inc.; Este documento contiene un aviso y la información bargained employees of AT&T COPIES AND CLAIMS Alascom, Inc., and international en Inglés. Si usted tiene dificultad en la comprensión employees not on U.S. payroll). de este documento, por favor comuníquese con Distributed to alternate payees OTHER and beneficiaries receiving AT&T Benefits Center, 877-722-0020. benefits from the retirement plans. This document replaces your existing Where to Go Distributed to COBRA participants, recipients of company-extended On the left side of each for More Information: Contact Information for coverage, surviving dependents page, you will find navigation and alternate recipients bars that allow you to quickly Employee Benefits Plans and Programs SMM dated (QMCSOs) of the populations noted above receiving benefits move between sections. January 2015. from the health and welfare plans. Where to go for more information | January 2017 1 Contents Important information ....................................... 5 PDF NAVIGATION: What action do I need to take? ................................... 5 How do I use this document? ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ameritech PART 21 SECTION 1 Tariff
    INDIANA BELL IURC NO. 20 TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. Ameritech PART 21 SECTION 1 Tariff PART 21 - Access Services SECTION 1 - General Original Sheet No. 1 ACCESS SERVICE Regulations, Rates and Charges applying to the provision of Access Services within a Local Access and Transport Area (LATA) or equivalent Market Area for connection to intrastate communications facilities for customers within the operating territory of the INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INCORPORATED Access Services are provided by means of wire, fiber optics, radio and any other suitable technology or a combination thereof. Material formerly appeared in T-8 Tariff, Part 5 , Sheet 1. Effective: July 19, 1995 N. L. Cubellis Vice President-Regulatory Filename: Part 21 Section 1_001.doc Directory: D:\indiana Template: D:\Documents and Settings\ydqkckr\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates\Normal.dot Title: INDIANA BELL Subject: Author: PEGGY Keywords: Comments: Creation Date: 5/15/1995 2:37:00 PM Change Number: 42 Last Saved On: 7/21/2008 1:17:00 PM Last Saved By: Licensed User Total Editing Time: 110 Minutes Last Printed On: 9/3/2008 2:35:00 PM As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages: 1 Number of Words: 115 (approx.) Number of Characters: 659 (approx.) Indiana Bell IURC NO. 20 Telephone Company, Inc. AT&T TARIFF Part 21 Section 1 PART 21 - Access Services 1st Revised Sheet 2 SECTION 1 - General Cancels Original Sheet 2 Concurrence Statement Submitted herewith pursuant to CAUSE NO. 39369, THIRD ORDER ON CONTINUING THE LIFTING OF THE STAY OF PROCESSING PETITIONS TO MAINTAIN PARITY ACCESS AND ORDER ON LESS THAN ALL THE ISSUES, approved April 30, 1993 and placed into effect and made final June 2, 1993 Indiana Bell hereby concurs and adopts by reference the terms and provisions of its interstate access tariff except as noted in the Table of Contents of the Indiana Bell Ameritech Operating Companies Tariff F.C.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Telesis Understands the Anxiety Over Job Retention and Growth That Can Arise When Two Major Businesses Merge. This Merger Is a Job-Growth Agreement
    JOBS IN CALIFORNIA Pacific Telesis understands the anxiety over job retention and growth that can arise when two major businesses merge. This merger is a job-growth agreement. To show confidence and good faith, Pacific Telesis agrees to the following: • The headquarters for Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell will remain in California and Nevada, respectively. In addition, a new company headquarters will be established in California that will provide integrated administrative and support services for the combined companies. Three subsidiary headquarters will also be established in California. These subsidiaries are long distance services, international operations and Internet. • The merged companies commit to expanding employment by at least one thousand jobs in Califomia over what would otherwise have been the case under previous plans if this merger had not occurred. The merged companies will report their progress to the CPUC within two years. CONSTRUCTION Nothing in this Commitment shall be interpreted to require Pacific Bell or Pacific Telesis to give any preference or advantage based on race, creed, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis in connection with employment, contracting Of other activities in violation of any federal, state or local law. Nothing herein shall be construed to establish or require quotas or timetables in connection with any • undertakings by Pacific Bell or Pacific Telesis to maintain a diverse workforce, contract with minority vendors, or provide services to underserved communities. -. 8 PARTNERSHiP COMMITMENT This Commitment is a ten-year partnership and commitment to the underserved communities of California. In furtherance of this par:tnership, Pacific Bell is undertaking an obligation to the Community Technology Fund that may extend over a decade or more as well as a seven-year commitment to the Universal Service Task Force.
    [Show full text]
  • AT&T Debt Information
    AT&T Inc. and Subsidiary Debt Detail - September 30, 2010 This chart shows the principal amount of AT&T Inc.'s and its subsidiaries' outstanding long-term debt issues as of the date above. AT&T intends to update this chart quarterly after filing its Form 10-Q or Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Outstanding Long-term Notes and Debentures Amount Outstanding at Unconditional Guarantee Entity (Original Issuer) Maturity Coupon Maturity Date Current Portion Long-term Portion Total by AT&T Inc. SBC Communications Inc. $1,000,000,000 5.300% 11/15/2010 $1,000,000,000 - $1,000,000,000 AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. $3,000,000,000 7.875% 3/1/2011 $3,000,000,000 - $3,000,000,000 SBC Communications Inc. $1,250,000,000 6.250% 3/15/2011 $1,250,000,000 - $1,250,000,000 BellSouth Corporation $1,000,000,000 4.295% 4/26/2021 (a) $1,000,000,000 - $1,000,000,000 Yes BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. $152,555,337 6.300% 12/15/2015 $24,012,263 $128,543,074 $152,555,337 Ameritech Capital Funding Corporation $59,802,300 9.100% 6/1/2016 $7,299,540 $52,502,760 $59,802,300 Various $112,492,335 Various Various $103,734,725 $8,757,610 $112,492,335 BellSouth Corporation $1,000,000,000 6.000% 10/15/2011 - $1,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 AT&T Corp. $1,500,000,000 7.300% 11/15/2011 - $1,500,000,000 $1,500,000,000 Yes Cingular Wireless LLC $750,000,000 6.500% 12/15/2011 - $750,000,000 $750,000,000 SBC Communications Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • • Affidavit of Robert Jason Weller (Ameritech Director O/Corporate Strategy Discusses How the SBC/Ameritech Merger Advances Am
    • Affidavit ofRobert Jason Weller (Ameritech Director o/Corporate Strategy discusses how the SBC/Ameritech merger advances Ameritech 's strategic objectives and improves its ability to serve its customers) • Affidavit ofPaul G. Osland (Ameritech Director o/Corporate Strategy explains the background and current status 0/Ameritech's test involving the resale 0/local service to residential cellular customers in St. Louis) • Affidavit ofFrancis X. Pampush (Ameritech Director o/Economic and Policy Studies describes the nature and extent oflocal service competition in Ameritech's region) • Affidavit ofWharton B. Rivers (President 0/Ameritech Network Services discusses customer service quality objectives) • Affidavit ofRichard 1. Gilbert and Robert G. Harris (Economists address the consumer effects o/the SBC/Ameritech merger) SBC Communications Inc. 1997 Audited Financial Statements • Maps 1. 30 Markets Targeted for SBC's National-Local Strategy 2. SBC/Ameritech Local Service Area -'.'" Competitive Networks - Little Rock, Arkansas 4. Competitive Networks - San Francisco, California 5. Competitive Networks - San Jose, California 6. Competitive Networks - PetalumalNapa, California 7. Competitive Networks - Sacramento, California 8. Competitive Networks - Stockton, California 9. Competitive Networks - Fresno, California 10. Competitive Networks - Los Angeles, California 11. Competitive Networks - Anaheim, California 12. Competitive Networks - San Diego, California 13. Competitive Networks - Wichita, Kansas 14. Competitive Networks - Kansas City, Kansas and Missouri 15. Competitive Networks - St. Louis, Missouri 16. Competitive Networks - Springfield, Missouri 17. Competitive Networks - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 18. Competitive Networks - Tulsa, Oklahoma 19. Competitive Networks - Austin, Texas 20. Competitive Networks - Corpus Christi, Texas 21. Competitive Networks - Dallas, Texas 22. Competitive Networks - Fort Worth, Texas ?'"--'. Competitive Networks - Houston, Texas 24. Competitive Networks - San Antonio, Texas v 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in Telecommunications Law
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW ANGELA D. O’BRIEN* INTRODUCTION It has been four years since President Clinton signed the revolutionary and ambitious Telecommunications Act of 19961 (“TA 96” or “the Act”) in order to remove barriers to competition in the local telecommunications market and provide all Americans with access to affordable telecommunications service. Since that time, and particularly within the past year, there have been a large number of regulatory and judicial decisions at the federal and state levels that endeavor to implement the goals of the Act and to regulate telecommunications carriers under specific provisions of state law. This Article reviews some of the significant developments in federal and Indiana telecommunications law2 for the period of October 1, 1998 to October 31, 1999. I. IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL COMPETITION The Act’s goal is to eliminate barriers to local competition in the telecommunications marketplace by requiring that incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILECs”) provide access to their networks to competitive local exchange carriers (“CLECs”). This access is facilitated by requiring ILECs (1) to permit a requesting new entrant in the [ILEC’s] local market to interconnect with the [ILEC’s] existing local network and thereby use the [ILEC’s] network to compete with the [ILEC] in providing telephone services (interconnection); (2) to provide its competing * J.D., 1998, Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis. The author is an Associate in the Chicago office of Mayer, Brown & Platt and a former Associate of Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis. The views expressed in this Survey are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those of the attorneys at Mayer, Brown & Platt or Barnes & Thornburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Cable Versus Direct Tv
    Charter Cable Versus Direct Tv Waylen gulls fulgently while exact Elroy noddled hortatorily or fullers resentfully. Revulsive Archy planishdepartmentalize, her tsarevna his Laodiceainfirmly and riff unloosed tetanizes abstractively.tho. Praedial and thirstiest Godfry uncover while subsiding Socrates Free money and services were getting a single place we can provide standard rates a permit requirements have given a charter tv can go with a good internet Both cable to satellite television services can advance during bad weather, although durable is more vague with satellite providers. You have direct broadcast is charter cable versus direct tv comparison sites for. York spoke at his Cox counterpart or twenty minutes and his Charter counterpart on a boot or voicemail lasting about thirty seconds. Ameritech acquires tvsm inc, charter cable versus direct tv technology to determine if you. Do not last week if you get a question, and nationwide networks, california public statement to charter cable versus direct tv, such action when there are unable to rent, expanding into separate public companies. The formation of beating out what kind of charter cable versus direct tv provider for. Surround sound fairly small towns grant cable argues that charter cable versus direct tv into the tier that? Of statutory authority prior to operating the availability based on tv! The deal with amazon and, really adds onto your email access exclusive access to validate your alarm with. Several internet service provider in areas of your area for specific channels you will the charter cable versus direct tv setsnine months after a lackluster year but charges. We do the red nav on cable tv.
    [Show full text]
  • AT&T Inc. and Subsidiary Debt Detail
    AT&T Inc. and Subsidiary Debt Detail - June 30, 2020 This chart shows the principal amount of AT&T Inc.'s and its subsidiaries' outstanding long -term debt issues as of the date above. AT&T intends to update this chart quarterly after filing its Form 10-Q or Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Outstanding Long-term Notes and Debentures Amount Outstanding at Unconditional Guarantee Entity (Original Issuer) Coupon Maturity Date Current Portion Long-term Portion Total Maturity by AT&T Inc. Various $1,664,410,714 (a) various various $1,215,774,429 $448,636,285 $1,664,410,714 AT&T Inc. $592,000,000 Zero 11/27/2022 (b) $527,017,731 $0 $527,017,731 AT&T Inc. € 2,250,000,000 Floating 8/3/2020 $2,527,650,000 $0 $2,527,650,000 AT&T Inc. CAD 1,000,000,000 3.825% 11/25/2020 $736,593,989 $0 $736,593,989 AT&T Inc. € 1,000,000,000 1.875% 12/4/2020 $1,123,400,000 $0 $1,123,400,000 AT&T Inc. $1,500,000,000 Floating 6/1/2021 $1,500,000,000 $0 $1,500,000,000 AT&T Inc. $1,500,000,000 Floating 7/15/2021 $0 $1,500,000,000 $1,500,000,000 AT&T Inc. € 1,000,000,000 2.650% 12/17/2021 $0 $1,123,400,000 $1,123,400,000 Michigan Bell Telephone Company $81,390,000 7.850% 1/15/2022 $0 $81,390,000 $81,390,000 AT&T Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1563 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter
    Federal Communications Commission DA 01-1563 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) ) 2001 Annual Access Tariff Filings ) CCB/CPD No. 01-08 ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 2, 2001 Released: July 2, 2001 By the Chief, Competitive Pricing Division: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Local exchange carriers (LECs) are required by section 69.3(a) of the Commission’s rules to file annual revisions to their interstate tariffs to become effective July 1, 2001.1 Price cap LECs and LECs subject to rate-of-return regulation filed their tariff transmittals on June 18, 2001, with AT&T filing a petition to suspend and investigate on June 25, 2001.2 On June 29, 2001, certain LECs filed replies to AT&T’s petition.3 2. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we suspend for five months and set for investigation the rates for the traffic sensitive basket filed by Moultrie Independent Telephone Company (Moultrie) in its 2001 Annual Access Tariff. We also suspend for one day and set for investigation the following LECs’ 2001 Annual Access Tariffs in the stated areas: 1) ALLTEL Telephone Systems’ (ALLTEL’s) rates for local switching; and 2) Ameritech Operating Companies’ (Ameritech’s), Frontier Telephone of Rochester, Inc.’s (Frontier of Rochester’s), Pacific Bell Telephone Company’s (PacBell’s), Qwest Communications, Inc.’s (Qwest’s), and Sprint Local Telephone Companies-Nevada’s (Sprint Nevada’s) rates for the multi-line business subscriber line charge.4 1 47 C.F.R. § 69.3(a). The filing deadline of July 1, 2001 was modified to July 3, 2001 because of the weekend schedule in June and July 2001 in order to accommodate the filing of tariff revisions under section 204(a)(3) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by the Telecommunications Act of 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Telephomania: the Contested Origins of the Urban Telephone Operating Company in the United States, 1879-1894
    Telephomania: The Contested Origins of the Urban Telephone Operating Company in the United States, 1879-1894 Richard John Great Cities Institute College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago Great Cities Institute Publication Number: GCP-05-02 A Great Cities Institute Working Paper JUNE 2005 The Great Cities Institute The Great Cities Institute is an interdisciplinary, applied urban research unit within the College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Its mission is to create, disseminate, and apply interdisciplinary knowledge on urban areas. Faculty from UIC and elsewhere work collaboratively on urban issues through interdisciplinary research, outreach and education projects. About the Author Richard John is Associate Professor of History in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He may be contacted at [email protected]. Great Cities Institute Publication Number: GCP-05-02 The views expressed in this report represent those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Great Cities Institute or the University of Illinois at Chicago. This is a working paper that represents research in progress. Inclusion here does not preclude final preparation for publication elsewhere. Great Cities Institute (MC 107) College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago 412 S. Peoria Street, Suite 400 Chicago IL 60607-7067 Phone: 312-996-8700 Fax: 312-996-8933 http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/gci UIC Great Cities Institute Telephomania: The Contested Origins of the Urban Telephone Operating Company in the United States, 1879-1894 This essay reconsiders the origins of the urban telephone exchange in the United States in the formative era of commercial telephony that stretched from 1879 and 1894.
    [Show full text]
  • CHC Appendix
    APPENDIX COORDINATED HOT CUT (CHC)/AT&T-13STATE AT&T-13STATE/TCG ST. LOUIS 020106 APPENDIX COORDINATED HOT CUT (CHC) 000065 APPENDIX COORDINATED HOT CUT (CHC)/AT&T-13STATE AT&T-13STATE/TCG ST. LOUIS 020106 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................................1 CHC SERVICE DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................................................2 CHC PRICING ...............................................................................................................................................................3 000066 APPENDIX COORDINATED HOT CUT (CHC)/AT&T-13STATE AT&T-13STATE/TCG ST. LOUIS 020106 APPENDIX COORDINATED HOT CUT (CHC) 1. INTRODUCTION This Appendix sets forth terms and conditions for Coordinated Hot Cut (CHC) provided by the applicable AT&T Inc. (AT&T) owned Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier (ILEC) and CLEC. 1.1 AT&T Inc. (AT&T) means the holding company which directly or indirectly owns the following ILECs: Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Illinois, Indiana Bell Telephone Company Incorporated d/b/a AT&T Indiana, Michigan Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Michigan, Nevada Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Nevada, The Ohio Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Ohio, Pacific Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T California, The Southern New England Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Connecticut, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company d/b/a AT&T Arkansas, AT&T Kansas, AT&T Missouri, AT&T Oklahoma and/or AT&T Texas and/or Wisconsin Bell, Inc. d/b/a AT&T Wisconsin. 1.2 AT&T-13STATE - As used herein, AT&T-13STATE means AT&T SOUTHWEST REGION 5-STATE, AT&T MIDWEST REGION 5-STATE, AT&T-2STATE and AT&T CONNECTICUT the applicable AT&T-owned ILEC(s) doing business in Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, and Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]