Rethinking the Study of Electoral Politics in the Developing World: Reflections on the Indian Case
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Reflection Rethinking the Study of Electoral Politics in the Developing World: Reflections on the Indian Case Adam Michael Auerbach, Jennifer Bussell, Simon Chauchard, Francesca R. Jensenius, Gareth Nellis, Mark Schneider, Neelanjan Sircar, Pavithra Suryanarayan, Tariq Thachil, Milan Vaishnav, Rahul Verma and Adam Ziegfeld In the study of electoral politics and political behavior in the developing world, India is often considered to be an exemplar of the centrality of contingency in distributive politics, the role of ethnicity in shaping political behavior, and the organizational weakness of political parties. Whereas these axioms have some empirical basis, the massive changes in political practices, the vast variation in political patterns, and the burgeoning literature on subnational dynamics in India mean that such generalizations are not tenable. In this article, we consider research on India that compels us to rethink the contention that India neatly fits the prevailing wisdom in the comparative politics literature. Our objective is to elucidate how the many nuanced insights about Indian politics can improve our understanding of electoral behavior both across and within other countries, allowing us to question core assumptions in theories of comparative politics. he study of electoral politics and political behavior and diverse scholarship, a set of conventional wisdoms has T across the developing world has grown into a sub- emerged that structure our understanding of electoral stantial body of scholarship over the past several dynamics in the developing world. In particular, three decades. A hallmark of this literature has been to revise pieces of received wisdom stand out. models first developed to explain the politics of advanced First, electoral politics in the developing world is seen to industrial countries. While it would be unwise to speak of be dominated by various forms of “distributive politics” a unified “consensus” that has materialized out of this rich (Stokes et al. 2013), which stand in marked contrast with Adam Michael Auerbach is Assistant Professor in the School of International Service, American University (aauerba@ american.edu) and is the author of Demanding Development: The Politics of Public Goods Provision in India’s Urban Slums (Cambridge University Press, 2020). His research on politics and development in urban India also appears in the American Journal of Political Science, American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, Studies in Comparative International Development, World Development, and World Politics, among other journals. Jennifer Bussell is Faculty Director of the Center on Contemporary India and Associate Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley ([email protected]). Her research on India includes Corruption and Reform in India: Public Services in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press, 2012) and Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies (Oxford University Press, 2019). Simon Chauchard is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Leiden University ([email protected]). His research interests include ethnic politics, voting behavior, political representation, and politicians-citizens relations in India. His works have appeared in Political Opinion Quarterly, the American Political Science Review, Comparative Political Studies, the Journal of Politics, and Asian Survey. His book, Why Representation Matters: The Meaning of Ethnic Quotas in Rural India (Cambridge University Press, 2017), combines qualitative work and a series of innovative surveys to explore the impact of caste-based reservation policies on everyday intergroup relations in India’s villages. Francesca R. Jensenius is Professor of Political Science at the University of Oslo and Research Professor at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) ([email protected]). In Social Justice through Inclusion: The Consequences of Electoral Quotas in India (Oxford University Press 2017) she explored long-term effects of electoral quotas for the Scheduled Castes in India. Her work on state approaches to empowering minorities and women, party system institutionalization, and doi:10.1017/S1537592721000062 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association 1 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 108.4.233.43, on 30 Mar 2021 at 20:32:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721000062 Reflection | Rethinking the Study of Electoral Politics in the Developing World programmatic politics linked to tax-and-transfer policies. “vote-buying” as the dominant form of distributive polit- Prevailing notions of distributive politics are often pre- ics (Stokes 2005; Nichter 2008). mised on the idea of quid pro quo contingent exchange, A second, related element of the received wisdom is that whereby voters select leaders based on targeted benefits ethnicity is one of the most—if not the most—crucial and leaders, in turn, deliver these benefits to voters. The determinants of vote choice for large sections of the commitment problems governing such discretionary developing world, particularly in South Asia and Sub- exchanges require parties to deploy local brokers who Saharan Africa. Many scholars acknowledge that voters monitor electoral compliance. The distribution of might have expressive preferences for co-ethnic candidates promised goods is typically understood to take place and parties (Horowitz 1985; Carlson 2015). Perhaps even during elections, leading to a focus on campaign season more influential, however, is the belief that ethnicity can electoral dynamics has appeared in, among other journals, AEJ: Applied Economics, Comparative Political Studies, Daedalus, Journal of Asian Studies, Journal of Politics, and Party Politics. Gareth Nellis is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego, where he specializes in comparative politics, political economy, and South Asia ([email protected]). His research addresses the extent to which elections serve as instruments of inclusion or exclusion in developing democracies. One line of his work examines the electoral rise of violent ethno-religious nationalism; the other aims to understand the political marginalization of internal migrants. Mark Schneider is Non-Resident Visiting Scholar at the Center for the Advanced Study of India (CASI) at the University of Pennsylvania ([email protected]). His research focuses on the micro-foundations of clientelism, elections, and distributive politics at the level of rural local governments in India. Neelanjan Sircar is Assistant Professor at Ashoka University and Senior Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi ([email protected]). His research interests include Indian political economy and comparative political behavior with an eye to Bayesian statistics, causal inference, social network analysis, and game theory. He is also a Non-Resident Fellow at the Center for the Advanced Study of India at the University of Pennsylvania. Pavithra Suryanarayan is Assistant Professor at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies ([email protected]). Her research agenda explores how different forms of inequality shape political behavior and state development in multi-ethnic and multi-racial contexts like India and the United States. She received a PhD in political science from Columbia University, and her dissertation won the Mancur Olson Award for the best dissertation in political economy at the American Political Science Association. Her research has been published in the American Journal of Political Science, American Political Science Review, Comparative Political Studies, Journal of Politics, Party Politics, and World Politics. Tariq Thachil is Director of the Center for Advanced Study of India (CASI), Associate Professor of Political Science, and Madan Lal Sobti Chair for the Study of Contemporary India at the University of Pennsylvania ([email protected]). He is the author of Elite Parties, Poor Voters: How Social Services Win Votes in India (Cambridge University Press, 2014). His research has appeared in American Journal of Political Science, American Political Science Review, Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, and World Politics, among other venues. Milan Vaishnav is Senior Fellow and Director of the South Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace ([email protected]). He also serves as Adjunct Professor at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He is the author of When Crime Pays: Money and Muscle in Indian Politics (Yale University Press, 2017) and co-editor (with Devesh Kapur) of Costs of Democracy: Political Finance in India (Oxford University Press, 2018). Rahul Verma is a Fellow at the Centre for Policy Research (CPR), New Delhi ([email protected]). He is also the co-author of Ideology and Identity: The Changing Party Systems of India (Oxford University Press, 2018). Adam Ziegfeld is Associate Professor of Political Science at Temple University ([email protected]). He is the author of Why Regional Parties? Clientelism, Elites, and the Indian Party System (Cambridge University Press, 2016) as well as numerous articles on political parties and elections that have appeared in a variety