2020 Sustainability Report – Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 Sustainability Report – Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc 2020 Sustainability Report Toward a smoke-free future Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. 2020 Sustainability Report 2 Table of contents Letter from our Managing Director 4 Approach to sustainability 5 Creating a smoke-free future 7 Operating with excellence 10 Caring for people 12 Protecting the environment 16 Change is underway at Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Key goals 19 Inc. (RBH). We are transforming our company, our products and our place in society. In this report, we share our vision and strategies for creating a smoke-free Canada and being a leader in the reduced-risk product space – along with our approaches to managing key environmental, social and governance topics. This report is published for the purpose of providing general information about Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. The purpose of this report is not for advertising or marketing; it is for use by scientists, the public health and regulatory communities, and other stakeholders with an interest in tobacco policy. The material in this report should not be regarded as an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any product of RBH. Such products are sold only in compliance with the laws of the particular jurisdictions in which they are sold. Letter from Director Approach to sustainability Creating a smoke-free future Operating with excellence Caring for people Protecting the environment Key goals Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. 2020 Sustainability Report 3 RBH, a subsidiary of Philip Morris International Inc. (PMI), is one of Canada’s leading tobacco companies. We are also spearheading the Unsmoke Canada conversation and helping Canadians go smoke-free. 780 31% 2019 economic employees of employees impact across Canada are women, and $180 million spent on 37% local goods and services of these women $120 million paid in 5 hold management positions employee wages and offices benefits $1 million invested in employee training Manufacturing plant 250 Over $200 million paid in Quebec City toward federal and vehicles provincial taxes We work with ≈ 8B 150 cigarettes farmers produced in 2020 in Canada Letter from Director Approach to sustainability Creating a smoke-free future Operating with excellence Caring for people Protecting the environment Key goals Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. 2020 Sustainability Report 4 Letter from our Managing Director to Unsmoke Canada by 2035, by which we mean to move Canada to a smoke-free future and to stop selling cigarettes. We haven’t talked much about Our message on smoking is clear: if you don’t smoke, don’t start. If you smoke, quit. If you these things publicly before – and don’t quit, change. And our parent company, PMI, is investing billions of dollars in research we want to fix that, recognizing and development to create innovative products that help adults who won’t quit that transparency and dialogue smoking to switch to alternatives. The best option is to always quit nicotine are critical for building trust and and tobacco use altogether, but smokers who choose not to quit should also be aware that fostering the change we envision.” alternatives exist. It is important to remember that these alternatives are not without risk. In this report, you’ll learn about some of our Thank you for taking the time to read our I am pleased to introduce RBH’s first They still contain nicotine and are addictive. other priorities as well, which relate to how sustainability report. We’re eager to have sustainability report. As a tobacco company, But, for adult smokers who would otherwise we conduct our business, how we support conversations with Canadians about creating we recognize that a report from us may continue to smoke, smoke-free alternatives our employees and communities, and actions a smoke-free future, and we hope this report be greeted with skepticism – and that’s provide an option that does not involve we’re taking to reduce our environmental gets the discussion going. While RBH has understandable – but we’re in a much combustion – or “burning” – like smoking a footprint. We haven’t talked much about contributed to the problem of smoking, different place than we were just four years cigarette does. This eliminates the inhalation these things publicly before – and we want we now have the means, resources and ago and we want to engage with Canadians on of smoke and, as a result, has the potential to fix that, recognizing that transparency and commitment to drive meaningful change. topics that matter deeply to us and to them. to significantly reduce the levels of harmful dialogue are critical for building trust and But we need governments, consumers and or potentially harmful chemicals caused fostering the change we envision. Canadians at large to join us. It goes without saying that the first and by by combustion. far the most significant of these topics is I’d also like to take this opportunity to Thank you, cigarette smoking and its negative impacts Here in Canada, RBH is tackling the issue of recognize publicly our own employees. Our on human health. It may surprise you to smoking on multiple fronts, which I encourage ability to achieve our Unsmoke vision depends learn that we’re staking our future on you to read about on page 5. These activities on their skills, dedication and relentless getting out of cigarettes, for the good of are at the heart of our corporate strategy and efforts, and they are rising to every challenge. Peter Luongo society and of our business. Our vision is sit atop our sustainability priorities. We cannot thank them enough. Managing Director Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. Letter from Director Approach to sustainability Creating a smoke-free future Operating with excellence Caring for people Protecting the environment Key goals Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. 2020 Sustainability Report 5 Approach to sustainability RBH’s vision to Unsmoke Canada The exercise helped us clarify priorities by 2035 is core to our strategy. and develop the pillars of our sustainability strategy. Our next step is to establish goals We know it is the right thing to against which we will then track and report do, and technology now makes publicly on progress. it possible. We are committed Within each pillar, tier 1 topics are those to setting ambitious goals, deemed to be most important to RBH’s working hard to reach them and sustainability as identified through our communicating our progress. assessment. For these topics, we will consider the commitments, goals and management To ensure that our sustainability work aligns approaches needed to mobilize our people with societal expectations and focuses and partners, and achieve meaningful impact. where we can have the greatest impact, we Tier 2 topics are important to us and managed conducted a materiality assessment in 2019. in the regular course of our business. Of Based on the approach proposed by the Global these topics, inclusion and diversity, illicit Reporting Initiative (GRI), an independent tobacco trade, policy influence, community organization that helps businesses engagement, emissions and energy, and water communicate their impact on critical stewardship are discussed in this report. sustainability issues, our assessment involved: Implementation of RBH’s sustainability • identifying topics based on prior strategy and performance is led by RBH’s assessments and peer reporting Director of External Affairs, Jeff Gaulin, • prioritizing topics based on stakeholder and his team, who reports to our Managing insights gathered through an online survey Director. In 2021, we plan to create and follow-up telephone interviews with a corporate Sustainability Committee select participants responsible for establishing, integrating and reporting on our sustainability goals and key • validating priorities and identifying performance indicators. key metrics, governance and reporting considerations Letter from Director Approach to sustainability Creating a smoke-free future Operating with excellence Caring for people Protecting the environment Key goals Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. 2020 Sustainability Report 6 RBH sustainability pillars Stakeholder engagement Stakeholder engagement is critical to STRATEGIC PILLARS TIER 1 TOPICS TIER 2 TOPICS achieving our vision of a smoke-free Canada. We need governments, health care Creating professionals, the scientific community, a smoke-free industry stakeholders, consumers and their Public health loved ones, plus the general public to be future Smoke-free products involved – and we engage regularly with all of these groups. Putting an end to smoking in Canada As part of our sustainability materiality assessment, we engaged with 59 internal and 69 external stakeholders in 2019. Responsible marketing and sales Operating These included RBH employees as well as with Responsible research and Illicit tobacco trade commercial customers, suppliers, community/ development civil society organizations, business excellence Policy influence Bribery, corruption and anti- associations, academia, sustainability Taxation consultants/experts, and provincial and Transforming Being a responsible business and competition corporate citizen municipal government representatives. for a Human rights sustainable Also in 2019, we stepped up our engagement with Indigenous communities. RBH joined smoke-free the Canadian Council for Aboriginal future Fair working conditions Business to identify and pursue meaningful Caring for Inclusion and diversity people Fair pay economic partnerships that can create Talent attraction and retention and support jobs, training and education
Recommended publications
  • Smoke-Free Ontario Strategy Monitoring Report | Pro-Tobacco Influences
    Smoke-Free Ontario Strategy Monitoring Report: Pro-Tobacco Influences Smoke-Free Ontario Strategy Monitoring Report | Pro-Tobacco Influences Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Pro-Tobacco Influences ............................................................................................................................... 4 Price and Taxation .................................................................................................................................. 5 Illicit Sales ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Agriculture and Production................................................................................................................... 10 Number of Farms and Production .................................................................................................... 11 Distribution and Consumption ............................................................................................................. 13 Availability ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Tobacco Retail-Free Areas ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Categorization of Cigarette Brands As Either Premium Or Discount
    Appendix 1. Categorization of Cigarette Brands as either Premium or Discount Category Name of Cigarette Brand Premium Accord, American Spirit, Barclay, Belair, Benson & Hedges, Camel, Capri, Carlton, Chesterfield, Davidoff, Du Maurier, Dunhill, Dunhill International, Eve, Kent, Kool, L&M, Lark, Lucky Strike, Marlboro, Max, Merit, Mild Seven, More, Nat Sherman, Newport, Now, Parliament, Players, Quest, Rothman’s, Salem, Sampoerna, Saratoga, Tareyton, True, Vantage, Virginia Slims, Winston, Raleigh, Business Club Full Flavor, Ronhill, Dreams Discount 24/7, 305, 1839, A1, Ace, Allstar, Allway Save, Alpine, American, American Diamond, American Hero, American Liberty, Arrow, Austin, Axis, Baileys, Bargain Buy, Baron, Basic, Beacon, Berkeley, Best Value, Black Hawk, Bonus Value, Boston, Bracar, Brand X, Brave, Brentwood, Bridgeport, Bronco, Bronson, Bucks, Buffalo, BV, Calon, Cambridge, Campton, Cannon, Cardinal, Carnival, Cavalier, Champion, Charter, Checkers, Cherokee, Cheyenne, Cimarron, Circle Z, Class A, Classic, Cobra, Complete, Corona, Courier, CT, Decade, Desert Gold, Desert Sun, Discount, Doral, Double Diamond, DTC, Durant, Eagle, Echo, Edgefield, Epic, Esquire, Euro, Exact, Exeter, First Choice, First Class, Focus, Fortuna, Galaxy Pro, Gauloises, Generals, Generic/Private Label, Geronimo, Gold Coast, Gold Crest, Golden Bay, Golden, Golden Beach, Golden Palace, GP, GPC, Grand, Grand Prix, G Smoke, GT Ones, Hava Club, HB, Heron, Highway, Hi-Val, Jacks, Jade, Kentucky Best, King Mountain, Kingsley, Kingston, Kingsport, Knife, Knights,
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Standardized Cigarette Packaging Among Young Women in Canada: a Discrete Choice Experiment
    The impact of standardized cigarette packaging among young women in Canada: A discrete choice experiment by Kathy Kotnowski A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Health Studies and Gerontology Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Kathy Kotnowski 2013 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Cigarette packaging is the most prominent form of tobacco promotion in Canada. Tobacco companies are increasingly selling cigarettes in innovative packaging, including the use of slim and super-slim “lipstick” sizes that are primarily marketed towards females. Australia is currently the only country that regulates the shape and size of cigarette packaging. The current study examined the relative importance of five cigarette packaging attributes—pack shape (e.g., “slims”) , brand, plain packaging, warning label size, and price—on perceptions of product taste, harm, and interest in trying, among young women in Canada. A discrete choice experiment was conducted online with smoking (n=211) and non- smoking (n=292) females, aged 16 to 24, recruited from a commercial sample. Respondents were shown 8 choice sets, each containing four packs displaying different combinations of the attributes: pack structure (slim, lipstick, booklet, standard); brand ( ‘Vogue’, ‘du Maurier’); branding (branded, plain); warning label size (50%, 75%); and price ($8.45, $10.45). For each choice set, respondents chose the brand that they: 1) would rather try, 2) would taste better, 3) would be less harmful, or “none”.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Alcohol and Cigarette Prices in Maseru, Gaborone, and Neighboring South African Towns
    : TRADE A GLOBAL REVIEW OF COUNTRY EXPERIENCES BOTSWANA, LESOTHO, AND SOUTH AFRICA: AN ANALYSIS OF ALCOHOL AND CIGARETTE PRICES IN MASERU, GABORONE, AND NEIGHBORING SOUTH AFRICAN TOWNS TECHNICAL REPORT OF THE WORLD BANK GROUP GLOBAL TOBACCO CONTROL PROGRAM. CONFRONTING EDITOR: SHEILA DUTTA ILLICIT TOBACCO BOTSWANA, LESOTHO, AND SOUTH AFRICA 19 BOTSWANA, LESOTHO, AND SOUTH AFRICA An Analysis of Alcohol and Cigarette Prices in Maseru, Gaborone, and Neighboring South African Towns Kirsten van der Zee and Corné van Walbeek1 Chapter Summary The government of Lesotho plans to implement a levy on tobacco and alcohol products. The proposed measure is similar to levies that have been implemented in Botswana in recent years. A concern is the possibility that Lesotho’s new levy may stimulate a significant increase in bootlegging between Lesotho and South Africa. This chapter investigates the presence and possibility of bootlegging between South Africa and Botswana, and South Africa and Lesotho, by describing the differences in cigarette and alcohol prices between Gaborone, Botswana, and the nearby South African towns of Mafikeng and Zeerust, as well as between Maseru, Lesotho, and nearby Ladybrand, South Africa. 1 Economics of Tobacco Control Project, University of Cape Town, South Africa. 551 551 Confronting Illicit Tobacco Trade: A Global Review of Country Experiences An analysis of comparative cigarette price data indicated the following: Gaborone and Mafikeng/Zeerust. Overall, average cigarette prices are significantly higher in Gaborone than in nearby South African towns. The cheapest pack price found in Gaborone was nearly five times the cheapest price identified in South Africa. Maseru and Ladybrand. Cigarette prices differ between Maseru and Ladybrand, but much less than between Gaborone and Mafikeng/Zeerust.
    [Show full text]
  • TAR WARS PROGRAM GUIDE Instructions for Implementing 2021-2022 School Year
    TAR WARS PROGRAM GUIDE Instructions for Implementing 2021-2022 School Year Supported in part by a grant from the American Academy of Family Physicians Foundation. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction to Tar Wars ........................................2 Tips for Teachers .................................................3 Tips for Presenters ................................................4 Quick Guide for Presenters ..........................................5 Cigarettes Activity 1: What’s in a Cigarette? .......................................6 Activity 2: “Sticky Person” ...........................................7 Activity 3: Financial Impact ..........................................8 Activity 4: Effects on Breathing .......................................9 Activity 5: Lung Damage and Disease Risk from Smoke .................... 10 E-cigarettes, Vapes, and Other ENDS Activity 6: Electronic Cigarettes .....................................11-12 Activity 7: What is JUUL®? .......................................... 13 Activity 8: Vaping Fortune Teller ...................................... 14 Activity 9: Effects of Vaping on the Body .............................15-16 Other Tobacco Products Activity 10: Smokeless Flavored Tobacco Products ........................ 17 Activity 11: Flavored Cigars and Cigarillos ............................... 18 Activity 12: Hookah .............................................19-20 Big Tobacco - Selling Harmful Substances Activity 13: Power of Advertising ....................................21-22 Activity
    [Show full text]
  • Smokefree and Tobacco-Free U.S. and Tribal Colleges and Universities
    Smokefree and Tobacco-Free U.S. and Tribal Colleges and Universities Campus-Wide Policies: Public Institutions Includes e-cigarette, hookah, Private Institutions and marijuana Vocational/Technical Schools coverage! Professional Schools Junior and Community Colleges Photos/graphics © South Carolina Hospital Association, UCLA, UTTC, OSU Association,UTTC,Carolina UCLA, Hospital South Photos/graphics© 2530 San Pablo Avenue, Suite J, Berkeley, CA 94702 | 510.841.3032 | 510.841.3071 Fax | no-smoke.org | [email protected] ANRF is a 501c3 nonprofit organization and donations are tax deductible | Tax ID #94-2922136 Smokefree and Tobacco-Free U.S. and Tribal Colleges and Universities July 1, 2021 There are now at least 2,542 100% smokefree campus sites. Of these, 2,104 are 100% tobacco- free, 2,176 prohibit e-cigarette use, 1,183 prohibit hookah use, 539 prohibit smoking/vaping marijuana, and 612 explicitly include personal vehicles on campus in the policy protections. The following three lists include colleges and universities with entirely smokefree campus sites (both indoors and outdoors) at a minimum (additional 100% protections -- E-cigarettes, hookah, and/or marijuana -- are indicated where applicable): 1. American Indian/Alaska Native Colleges Requiring 100% Smokefree Campuses 2. U.S. State Laws Requiring 100% Smokefree Campuses 3. All: Both lists above, plus U.S College/University 100% Smokefree Campus Policies Visit our Smokefree Colleges & Universities resource page at https://no-smoke.org/at-risk- places/colleges/ for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Edition 1.0 2/40 TKM60P User's Manual
    Edition 1.0 2/40 TKM60P User’s manual 0. Preliminary information .................................................................................................. 4 0.1. SYMBOLS AND CONVENTIONS USED IN THIS MANUAL.................................................................. 4 0.2. INDEX OF REVISIONS........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Incremental and absolute encoders ........................................................................................................ 5 1.2. Mechanical assembly.............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. The TKM60P absolute encoder .............................................................................................................. 6 2. The TKM60P encoder ...................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Technical characteristics......................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Electrical characteristics.......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Mechanical characteristics .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 2014 Delivering Today Investing in Tomorrow PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 2014 Chairman’S Introduction Our Year in Numbers
    PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 2014 Delivering today Investing in tomorrow PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 2014 Chairman’s introduction Our year in numbers Group cigarette volume 667bn -1.4% 2013: 676bn Revenue Revenue at constant exchange rates1 £13,971m £15,682m -8.4% +2.8% 2013: £15,260m 2013: £15,260m The Group continued to perform Profit from operations Adjusted profit from operations2 at constant extremely well in 2014 despite challenging exchange rates1 trading conditions. We grew revenue and profit at constant rates of exchange and £4,546m £6,075m we increased our market share. Although -17.7% +4.4% significant exchange rate movements 2013: £5,526m 2013: £5,820m impacted our reported results, the Adjusted diluted Adjusted diluted earnings underlying performance of our business earnings per share2 per share2 at constant rates remains strong. The increase in our total of exchange1 dividend for 2014 to 148.1p reflects our commitment to growing shareholder 208.1p 233.7p returns as well as our confidence in the -3.9% +7.9% strength of our business, our strategy 2013: 216.6p 2013: 216.6p and our future. Basic earnings per share Total dividends per share Richard Burrows Chairman 167.1p 148.1p -18.6% +4.0% 2013: 205.4p 2013: 142.4p Notes: 1. Constant currency provides the information based on a re-translation, at prior year exchange rates, of the current year information. 2. Adjusted profit from operations is derived after excluding the adjusting items from the profit from operations. These items include restructuring and integration costs, amortisation and impairment of trademarks and similar intangibles, a gain on deemed partial disposal of a trademark and a payment and release of provision relating to non-tobacco litigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Side of Marketing Seemingly “Light” Cigarettes: Successful Images and Failed Fact R W Pollay, T Dewhirst
    i18 Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i18 on 1 March 2002. Downloaded from The dark side of marketing seemingly “Light” cigarettes: successful images and failed fact R W Pollay, T Dewhirst ............................................................................................................................. Tobacco Control 2002;11(Suppl I):i18–i31 Objective: To understand the development, intent, and consequences of US tobacco industry advertis- ing for low machine yield cigarettes. Methods: Analysis of trade sources and internal US tobacco company documents now available on various web sites created by corporations, litigation, or public health bodies. Results: When introducing low yield products, cigarette manufacturers were concerned about maintaining products with acceptable taste/flavour and feared consumers might become weaned from See end of article for smoking. Several tactics were employed by cigarette manufacturers, leading consumers to perceive fil- authors’ affiliations tered and low machine yield brands as safer relative to other brands. Tactics include using cosmetic ....................... (that is, ineffective) filters, loosening filters over time, using medicinal menthol, using high tech imagery, using virtuous brand names and descriptors, adding a virtuous variant to a brand’s product line, and Correspondence to: Richard W Pollay, Faculty generating misleading data on tar and nicotine yields. of Commerce and Business Conclusions: Advertisements of filtered and low tar cigarettes were intended
    [Show full text]
  • Cigarette Marketing and Smoking Culture in 1930S Canada Daniel J
    Document généré le 28 sept. 2021 18:59 Journal of the Canadian Historical Association Revue de la Société historique du Canada Cigarette Marketing and Smoking Culture in 1930s Canada Daniel J. Robinson Volume 25, numéro 1, 2014 Résumé de l'article Le présent article examine les changements politico-économiques, culturels et URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1032799ar commerciaux des années 1930 qui ont consolidé l’industrie du tabac au pays et DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1032799ar fait du tabagisme une pratique sociale normalisée. Au cours de cette décennie, la culture de tabac à cigarettes s’est accrue de façon exponentielle dans le sud Aller au sommaire du numéro de l’Ontario, au même titre que la fabrication de cigarettes, surtout à Montréal. Le marketing et la publicité de la cigarette battaient leur plein, comme en font foi la multitude de primes, de rabais, de commandites sportives et de publicités Éditeur(s) présentant des témoignages d’athlètes et de célébrités. Pour la première fois, les femmes étaient régulièrement ciblées par les publicités de cigarettes, et leur The Canadian Historical Association / La Société historique du Canada entrée dans le cercle des fumeurs « légitimes » a marqué un tournant pour les fabricants de tabac. Deux nouveautés ont donné du tonus à la viabilité à long ISSN terme de l’industrie de la cigarette. Premièrement, la compagnie de tabac dominante au Canada, Imperial Tobacco, a beaucoup investi dans des 0847-4478 (imprimé) opérations de relations publiques pour réfuter les critiques du public au sujet 1712-6274 (numérique) de ses pratiques commerciales sauvages.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Plan to End the 'Light'and 'Mild'deception
    A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO END THE ‘LIGHT’ AND ‘MILD’ DECEPTION. January 2005 Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada 1226 A Wellington Street ♦ Ottawa ♦ Ontario ♦ K1Y 3A1 Tel: 233 4878 ♦ Fax: 233-7797 ♦ www.smoke-free.ca A comprehensive plan to end the ‘light’ and ‘mild’ deception. For over thirty years, Canadian tobacco companies have deceived smokers into thinking that ‘light’ cigarettes are less harmful than ‘regular’ cigarettes. They have designed their cigarettes and their cigarette packaging and marketing to perpetuate this deception. For over twenty years, Health Canada has known that the measurements of tar, nicotine and other compounds produced by smoking machines do not reflect the amount of harmful Believe That Light or Mild Cigarettes reduce the Risks of Smoking Without Having to Give Up Smoking substances inhaled by real smokers. For over six years, 18% Health Ministers and the department have admitted that this 16% deception is harming Canadians, but have done nothing to 14% stop change the way tobacco companies use packaging 12% marketing and cigarette design to deceive smokers. 10% 8% For over ten years, health groups have been calling for an end 6% to the deception and have called on Health Canada to use its 4% regulatory power to ban deceptive packaging and labelling 2% Percentage of Light/Mild Smokers 0% and have called on the Competition Bureau and other 15-19 years 20-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45 years & consumer protection bodies to intervene. over Men Women Many Canadians still believe that these cigarettes are less Health Canada surveys show that the light and harmful, even though governments and other health mild deception harms many smokers authorities have cautioned that this is not the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Eye on the Industry 2016
    Eye on the Industry Spring 2016 Edition Smoking and Health Action Foundation/ Non-Smokers’ Rights Association Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Main Tobacco Companies in Canada ............................................................................................................ 3 Key Canadian Tobacco Market Indicators .................................................................................................... 4 Issues Facing the Industry in Canada ............................................................................................................ 7 Plain & standardized packaging ................................................................................................................ 7 Pack-based promotion stronger than ever ........................................................................................... 7 Canada moves forward ......................................................................................................................... 9 Flavour bans ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Quebec bans payments to retailers ........................................................................................................ 11 Minimum warning size in Quebec .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]