JAC : A Journal Of Composition Theory ISSN : 0731-6755 Life Cycles of Humanism and Modernism in America: Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio 1 Dr. A. Glory, 2 Sheeba P.S 1 Dr. A. Glory, Research Supervisor & Assistant Professor, Department of English, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidhambaram, Tamilnadu – 608002, S. INDIA, E-Mail :
[email protected] 2Sheeba P S, Research Scholar, PG & Research Department of English, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidhambaram, Tamilnadu – 608002, S. INDIA Abstract: Sherwood Anderson's way of thinking depends on a pantheistic vitalism and relating natural "love of life" which works on two levels: as crude affinity with the humor and concordance of life forms and as compassionate empathy. The Puritan legacy of realism and industrialism, he accepted, had smothered the essentialness of life in America and had brought about close to home clairvoyant mutilation just as discontinuity and turmoil in social experience. The capacity of artist is the rebuilding of intuition and feeling in a progress which subordinates human essentialness to generic structures of realism. Anderson imagined excellence in humanistic instead of tasteful terms—as an element of imperativeness. His helpful motivations likewise drove him to an idea of the artist as "darling," whose thoughtful creative mind can change human disappointment and express it as magnificence. At each point tasteful worth is confirmed by human worth. Consequently the ethical noteworthiness of stylish structure, which is indivisible from structure in human courses of action. Just that workmanship which fathoms life in its issue and crudity can be unadulterated and moral, Anderson contends, and in like manner just a worth framework which perceives the crudity of life and doesn't sparkle it over in light of a legitimate concern for bogus optimism can have moral legitimacy.