DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Environmental Statement Volume 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Environmental Statement Volume 2 Innovation Park Medway EIA Volume 2: Technical Appendices Appendix 2-1: Request for Screening and Scoping Opinion Appendix Innovation Park Medway Environmental Impact Assessment Updated Request for a Screening and Scoping Opinion For Medway Council Project Number: 12841 May 2019 IEMA EIA QUALITY MARK HOLDERS Campbell Reith Hill LLP Raven House 29 Linkfield Lane Redhill Surrey RH1 1SS T:+44 (0)1737 784500 F:+44 (0)1737 784501 E:[email protected] W:www.campbellreith.com Innovation Park Medway Request for an EIA Screening and Scoping Opinion Document History and Status Revision Date Purpose/Status File Ref Author Check Review D1 26/09/2018 For Review 12841SMG-250918- SMG RC SRB InnovationParkSreening&Scopin gOpinionD1.docx D2 05/10/2018 For review 12841SMG-051018- SMG RC SRB InnovationParkSreening&Scopin gOpinionD2.docx D3 24/04/2019 For comment 12841-DWS-XX-XX-RP-EN- DWS SRB SRB 0001_Screening&ScopingD03.do cx F1 01/05/2019 For issue 12841-DWS-XX-XX-RP-EN- DWS SRB SRB 0001_Screening&ScopingF1.doc x This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Campbell Reith Hill LLP’s (CampbellReith) appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of the appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole use and reliance of CampbellReith’s client. CampbellReith accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes, stated in the document, for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of Campbell Reith Hill LLP. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. The contents of this document are not to be construed as providing legal, business or tax advice or opinion. © Campbell Reith Hill LLP 2019 Document Details Last saved 01/05/2019 12:11 Path 12841-DWS-XX-XX-RP-EN-0001_Screening&ScopingF1.docx Author DWS/RC Project Partner Simon Boots Project Number 12841 Project Name Innovation Park Medway ii Innovation Park Medway Request for an EIA Screening and Scoping Opinion Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 Planning context ............................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 The development in the context of the EIA Regulations ............................................................ 2-2 Screening and the Local Development Order ....................................................................... 2-2 Scoping Opinion ................................................................................................................ 2-3 3.0 The Site ................................................................................................................................ 3-1 Site Location ..................................................................................................................... 3-1 Site description ................................................................................................................. 3-1 Surrounding land .............................................................................................................. 3-2 Site History ....................................................................................................................... 3-3 Designations ..................................................................................................................... 3-4 4.0 The Proposed Development .................................................................................................... 4-1 2014 Masterplan ............................................................................................................... 4-1 Description of the Proposed Development ........................................................................... 4-1 5.0 Site context and Potential Environmental Issues ...................................................................... 5-1 Traffic and Transport ......................................................................................................... 5-1 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................ 5-4 Noise ................................................................................................................................ 5-5 Ground conditions, Contamination and Unexploded Ordnance .............................................. 5-5 Water Environment (resource and flood risk) ...................................................................... 5-7 Cultural Heritage and Archaeology ..................................................................................... 5-8 Ecology and Nature Conservation ..................................................................................... 5-10 Landscape and Visual Impact ........................................................................................... 5-11 Socio-Economic ............................................................................................................... 5-12 Waste ............................................................................................................................. 5-13 Aviation .......................................................................................................................... 5-13 Climate Change ............................................................................................................... 5-15 Risk of major accidents and/or disasters ........................................................................... 5-15 Cumulative and in-combination effects ............................................................................. 5-15 6.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 6-1 Appendices: Appendix A: Figures 1.1 Site Location 3.2 Red line boundary 5.1 Scheduled Monuments and Listed Buildings 5.2 Designated Ecological Sites Appendix B: Parameter Plans Appendix C: Aviation risk assessment Structural Civil Environmental Geotechnical Transportation iii Innovation Park Medway Request for an EIA Screening and Scoping Opinion 1.0 INTRODUCTION Planning context 1.1.1 Medway Council (MC) and Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (TMBC) (hereafter jointly referred to as ‘the applicant’) are preparing a masterplan for the development of approximately 18.37 hectares (ha) of land on the current site of Rochester Airport, referred to as the ‘Proposed Development’, for employment-led development and supporting infrastructure. The site location and red line boundary are shown within Appendix A. 1.1.2 The preferred way for the development to be progressed is by way of a Local Development Order (LDO) in accordance with section 61A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Such an order should be screened for the need for Environmental Impact Assessment in accordance with Regulation 6 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the ‘Regulations’), as amended. 1.1.3 This report therefore represents a formal request for an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Screening Opinion and a subsequent Scoping Opinion. 1.1.4 MC will act as lead planning authority. TMBC will act in a consultative basis and will adopt the agreed EIA Screening and Scoping Opinions. 1.1.5 This request for an EIA Screening and Scoping Opinion was originally submitted, and issued for consultation in October 2018. Subsequently, consultation comments have been taken into account and the scope of the EIA has been updated. The request for a Scoping Opinion is therefore being re-issued for consultation. To aid interpretation by consultees that had reviewed and commented on the previous draft, the additional sections of text have been provided in a blue font. An additional appendix has also been included (Appendix C). Innovation Park Medway Request for an EIA Screening and Scoping Opinion 2.0 THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EIA REGULATIONS Screening and the Local Development Order 2.1.1 This Request for a Screening Opinion is issued in accordance with the requirements set out within the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, as amended. 2.1.2 Regulation 32 deals with LDO applications, which states that an LDO must not be made until the Local Planning Authority has adopted a screening opinion. In this context, the Proposed Development falls within the descriptions of development contained within Schedule 2, category 10(a) Industrial estate development projects. 2.1.3 A development is considered to be Schedule 2 development if any part of it lies within a ‘sensitive area’ or if it meets or exceeds the relevant thresholds and criteria for that category of development, as detailed in the EIA Regulations. For category 10(a) projects, this is as follows: i. “The area of the development exceeds 0.5 hectares.” 2.1.4 Schedule 3 of the Regulations sets out the considerations that are to be applied in determining whether significant environmental effects may be present sufficient to require an EIA. These are: i. Characteristics of the proposed development; ii. Nature of the receiving environment; and iii. Characteristics of the potential environmental impacts arising from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Medway Megaliths and Neolithic Kent
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE MEDWAY MEGALITHS AND NEOLITHIC KENT* ROBIN HOLGATE, B.Sc. INTRODUCTION The Medway megaliths constitute a geographically well-defined group of this Neolithic site-type1 and are the only megalithic group in eastern England. Previous accounts of these monuments2 have largely been devoted to their morphology and origins; a study in- corporating current trends in British megalithic studies is therefore long overdue. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN BRITISH MEGALITHIC STUDIES Until the late 1960s, megalithic chambered barrows and cairns were considered to have functioned purely as tombs: they were the burial vaults and funerary monuments for people living in the fourth and third millennia B.C. The first academic studies of these monuments therefore concentrated on the typological analysis of their plans. This method of analysis, though, has often produced incorrect in- terpretations: without excavation it is often impossible to reconstruct the sequence of development and original appearance for a large number of megaliths. In addition, plan-typology disregards other aspects related to them, for example constructional * I am indebted to Peter Drewett for reading and commenting on a first draft of this article; naturally I take responsibility for all the views expressed. 1 G.E. Daniel, The Prehistoric Chamber Tombs of England and Wales, Cambridge, 1950, 12. 2 Daniel, op. cit; J.H. Evans, 'Kentish Megalith Types', Arch. Cant, Ixiii (1950), 63-81; R.F. Jessup, South-East England, London, 1970. 221 THE MEDWAY MEGALITHS GRAVESEND. ROCHESTER CHATHAM r>v.-5rt AYLESFORD MAIDSTONE Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Potential Local Nature Reserves
    Appendix 1 Evaluation of Potential Local Nature Reserves Main Report For Maidstone Borough Council September 2019 Wimpey Field, Staplehurst Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Background to this Report ........................................................................................................ 1 Selecting Local Nature Reserves .............................................................................................. 2 Setting up a Local Nature Reserve ........................................................................................... 3 Approach to Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 4 Constraints to LNR Designation................................................................................................ 8 Evaluation of the Sites .................................................................................................... 9 The Sites .................................................................................................................................. 9 Summary of Evaluation .......................................................................................................... 15 Introduction Background to this Report Local Nature Reserves (LNRs) are a statutory designation made under Section 21 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 by principal local authorities. They are places
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
    . JVASV^iX ^ N^ {/) lSNrNVIN0SHilWS*^S3ldVaan^LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Ni <n - M ^^ <n 5 CO Z ^ ^ 2 ^—^ _j 2 -I RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIinillSNI NVINOSHilWS S3iyVdan U r- ^ ^ 2 CD 4 A'^iitfwN r: > — w ? _ ISNI NVINOSHilWS SBiyVdan LIBRARIES'SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION f^ <rt .... CO 2 2 2 s;- W to 2 C/J • 2 CO *^ 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN_INSTITUTlON NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHilWS S3liiVyan_L; iiSNi"^NViNOSHiiNS S3iyvaan libraries smithsonian'^institution i^ 33 . z I/' ^ ^ (^ RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHilWS S3lbVHan Li CO — -- — "> — IISNI NVINOSHimS S3IMVHan LIBRARIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION N' 2 -J 2 _j 2 RIES SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIifllliSNI NVINOSHIIWS SSIMVyail L! MOTITI IT I f\t _NviN0SHiiws'^S3iMvaan libraries'^smithsonian^institution NOlin z \ '^ ^—s^ 5 <^ ^ ^ ^ '^ - /^w\ ^ /^^\ - ^^ ^ /^rf^\ - /^ o ^^^ — x.ii:i2Ji^ o ??'^ — \ii Z ^^^^^""-^ o ^^^^^ -» 2 _J Z -J , ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIXniliSNI NVINOSHillMS $3 I M VH 8 !!_ LI BR = C/> ± O) ^. ? CO I NVINOSHimS S3iaVHan libraries SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIlf CO ..-. CO 2 Z z . o .3 :/.^ C/)o Z u. ^^^ i to Z CO • z to * z > SMITHS0NIAN_1NSTITUTI0N NOIiniliSNI_NVINOSHimS S3 I d ViJ 8 n_LI B R UJ i"'NViNOSHiiws S3ibvyan libraries smithsonian"^institution Noiir r~ > z r- Z r- 2: . CO . ^ ^ ^ ^ ; SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHillNS SSiyVMail LI BR CO . •» Z r, <^ 2 z 5 ^^4ii?^^ ^' X^W o ^"^- x life ^<ji; o ^'f;0: i >^ _NVIN0SHiIlMs'^S3iyVdan^LIBRARIEs'^SMITHS0NlAN INSTITUTION NOlif Z \ ^'^ ^-rr-^ 5 CO n CO CO o z > SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION NOIiniliSNI NVINOSHimS S3 I ^Vd 8 11 LI BR >" _ . z 3 ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECORD AND Journal of Variation Edited by P.A. SOKOLOFF fre s Assistant Editors J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Boxley Parish Council
    BOXLEY PARISH COUNCIL www.boxleyparishcouncil.org.uk Clerk – Mrs Pauline Bowdery Beechen Hall Assistant Clerk – Mrs Melanie Fooks Wildfell Close Tel – 01634 861237 Walderslade E-mail – [email protected] Chatham Kent ME5 9RU To Parish Councillors, members of the public and press. Date 20 January 2015 Members are hereby summoned and notice is given that a Meeting of the Parish Council will be held at Beechen Hall, Wildfell Close, Walderslade, ME5 9RU at 7.30pm on 26 January 2015 when it is proposed to transact the following business: Time guide 1. Apologies and absences. (7.30) To receive and accept apologies for absence. 2. Declaration of Interests, Dispensations, Predetermination or Lobbying. (7.31) Members are required to declare any interests, dispensations, predetermination or lobbying on items on this agenda. Members are reminded that changes to the Register of Interests should be notified to the Clerk. 3. Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting of 1 December 2014. (7.33) To consider the minutes of the meeting and if in order sign as a true record (pages 3-5). 4. Matters Arising From the Minutes. (7.35) 4.1 Minute 2707/4.1 Boxley Warren Awards for All application. Clerk to complete work and liaise with Cllr Harwood. 4.2 Minute 2707/4.2 War Memorial leaflet. A draft leaflet has been produced and copied to the researcher asking if the parish council can include, with a suitable acknowledgement, the detailed information she has amassed. 4.3 Any other matters arising from the minutes which are not on the agenda. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Tottington's Sarsen Stones
    PAPER No. 0001-02 GREAT TOTTINGTON’S SARSEN STONES PAUL ASHBEE This paper has been downloaded from www.kentarchaeology.ac. The author has placed the paper on the site for download for personal or academic use. Any other use must be cleared with the author of the paper who retains the copyright. Please email [email protected] for details regarding copyright clearance. The Kent Archaeological Society (Registered Charity 223382) welcomes the submission of papers. The necessary form can be downloaded from the website at www.kentarchaeology.ac Whereas the sarsen stone-built long barrow remains on Blue Bell Hill have been noticed and described since the sixteenth century (Ashbee 1993), no more than incidental mention has been made of the many stones, grouped and isolated, which were at one time to be seen on the lower land skirting Great Tottington. Spreads of substantial stones, brought down from the heights by periglacial solifluxion, were to be found in Westfield Wood and behind the Lower Bell Inn, while, at one time, there were scattered boulders from Burham to Boxley and Bearsted. At Tottington, in the nineteenth century, an array of stones, large and small, were seen to lie around the farmyard; while others, some substantial, rested on the banks and in the spring-head which fed the pools and moat. Similarly, such sarsen stones were also a feature of the Cossington spring-head, almost a mile to the east. From the eighteenth century onwards, antiquarians and various archaeologists have speculated, regarding these as erstwhile circles and avenues. Sadly, Great Tottington’s sarsen stones, like those higher upon Blue Bell Hill, have been neither planned nor examined in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Ec Ecolo Ogy a and D Evi Iden
    Ecology and Evidence Winter newsletter 2017/18 DISCOVER wildlife, DATA gather, DELIVER cconservation Cover picture: Deptford pink Dianthus armeria, by Peter Atherall The Deptford pink has declined rapidly in range and is now known to inhabit only about 15 sites in the UK, mainly in the south. It prefers light, sandy, acidic soils, and requires open conditions to grow well. It can be found on disturbed ground, such as tracks and field edges, along hedgerows and in dry pasture. In Kent it is found on Kent Wildlife Trust’s Sandwich Bay National Nature Reserve and at Farnigham Woods. Kent Wildlife Trust Ecology and Evidence Winter newsletter 2017/18 Introduction community, visitor or educattional interest. For example at Welcome to the winter 2017/18 ecology and evidence our Queendown Warren reseerve in the Medway Smile newsletter, which this year is bigger than ever before. I Living Landscape, chalk grassland, woodland and early have taken the decision this year to encompass not only spider orchids have been identified as key nature Ecology Groups, but also to highlight the wealth of other conservation features. Each feature will have a number of work carried out by Kent Wildlife Trust and our volunteers attributes which are its charaacteristics, qualities or in the vital areas of monitoring and evidence. Evidence is properties. Attributes are the measurable performance absolutely critical to what we do, and it is increasingly indicators which together help to indicate the condition of important that we are able to demonstrate the efficacy of the feature. Examples might t be the size of an orchid colony, our management of Kent’s wildlife and habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin BMIG 28
    Bulletin of the British Myriapod & Isopod Group Volume 28 (2015) REPORT ON THE BMIG FIELD MEETING IN KENT 2011 Paul Lee1, A. D. Barber2 and Steve J. Gregory3 1 Little Orchard, Bentley, Ipswich, Suffolk IP9 2DW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Rathgar, Exeter Road, Ivybridge, Devon PL21 0BD, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 3 200 Ock Street, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 5DR, UK. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The 2011 BMIG field weekend, held from 14th to 17th April, was based at the University of Kent at Canterbury. The county has been extensively recorded for myriapods and isopods over the last century and in his introductory talk Eric Philp presented attendees with a species list for Kent along with a challenge to add even a single species so confident was he of the effort that had gone in to ensuring that recording in the county was comprehensive. However, the main purpose of this meeting, one for which a Defra grant had been awarded through Hymettus, was a systematic survey for what were then UK BAP species, the millipedes Polyzonium germanicum and Metaiulus pratensis both of which are Kent specialities. Late thirteenth century archaeological deposits from Stonar (north of Sandwich) provide the earliest woodlouse record from Kent in the form of calcified remains of Porcellio laevis (Girling, 1979). George Newport (1803 – 1854), one of the pioneers of myriapod studies in Britain, was born at Canterbury and published important papers on these animals between 1841 and 1856. His original description of Lithobius melanops was based on specimens actually collected by him from a garden at Sandwich in 1842.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report 43
    A FOLLOW-UP SURVEY TO PERMANENT TRANSECT RECORDS OF SELECTED STORM DAMAGED WOODLAND, IN KENT. BY STEPHEN J PARKER JANUARY 1993 Introduction Following the storm of October 1987, K.T.N.C. was contracted by N.C.C. to set up and record, permanently marked relocatable transects through selected areas of storm damaged woodland within areas designated as non-intervention zones. The main purpose being to provide base line recording for future studies on the stand scale (level 3.) at the selected sites. The work was carried out by D.N.Hutton. The following sites were monitored: 1. Scords Wood, Toys Hill, Sevenoaks. (National Trust owned.) 2. Westfield Wood, Maidstone. (K.T.N.C. leasehold) 3. Parsonage Wood, Cranbrook. (K.T.N.C. owned.) The recording was based on 20m wide transects as described in Peterken and Backmerof 1988 and with reference to work done by Dr. A. Whitbread while employed by N.C.C. (1988). This survey was a follow-up to that carried out by D.N.Hutton in 1988. Selected lengths of the transects have been resurveyed using the same method, the objective being to monitor changes in the woodland structure. Acknowledqements I would like to thank Dave Hutton for all the help and advice he gave to me during the survey. Recording method The recording method used was the same as that used by D.N,Hutton in 1988. (see App 1) In some areas it was not possible to record the girths of saplings even if they reached the required height of 1.3m, this was due to considerable amount of regrowth.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 3 Planning Committee Part 1 Public 5 March 2009 DECISIONS
    Area 3 Planning Committee DECISIONS ISSUED SUBSEQUENT TO PREVIOUS LIST 'D' All applications with the suffix MIN, WAS, CR3 were decided by the Kent County Council. Parish Site Address (Ward) Proposal Application Reference Decision Decision Date Aylesford Land Part Of Westfield Wood Lower Warren Road Aylesford Kent (Aylesford) Article 10 Consultation by Maidstone Borough Council for change TM/07/03106/A10 of use from agricultural to mixed use agricultural and use as a nature reserve (MBC ref. MA/07/1609) Approved on 13 December 2007 Aylesford Former 80 Salisbury Road Aylesford Kent ME20 7EW (Blue Bell Hill And Walderslade) Retrospective application for vehicular access to existing paddock - new paddock gate and 5m hardstanding TM/08/03430/FL Approved on 17 February 2009 Aylesford 47 Holtwood Avenue Aylesford Kent ME20 7QH (Aylesford) Landscaping details submitted pursuant to condition 2 of planning TM/08/03463/RD permission ref. TM/08/02888/FL (retrospective application for retention of brick piers and close boarded fencing) Approved on 22 January 2009 Aylesford 10 Ffinch Close Ditton Aylesford Kent ME20 6ET (Aylesford) Single storey side extension TM/08/03554/FL Approved on 2 February 2009 Aylesford 420 London Road Ditton Aylesford Kent ME20 6DA (Aylesford) Two storey rear extension and first floor side extension TM/08/03569/FL Approved on 22 January 2009 Part 1 Public 5 March 2009 Area 3 Planning Committee Aylesford 15 Gorse Crescent Ditton Aylesford Kent ME20 6ES (Aylesford) Reduce crown of Birch tree by 20% (T.P.O. 12-02-14) TM/08/03582/TPOC
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet, Council Or Committee Report for Westfield Wood Local
    MAIDSTONE BOROUGH COUNCIL Cobtree Manor Estate Committee 11 th July 2012 REPORT OF THE COBTREE OFFICER Report prepared by Joanna Joyce 1. A report on the proposed designation of Westfield Wood as a Local Nature Reserve 1.1 Issue for Decision 1.1.1 To consider a proposal from Kent Wildlife Trust (KWT) that the section of Westfield Wood leased by KWT from Maidstone Borough Council be put forward for designation as a Local Nature Reserve. 1.2 Recommendation of the Cobtree Officer 1.2.1 That the Committee approves the request of Kent Wildlife Trust to apply for designation as a Local Nature Reserve for the section of Westfield Wood that KWT leases from Maidstone Borough Council in its capacity as corporate Trustee for the registered charity known as Cobtree Manor Estate. 1.2.2 To authorise the Head of Legal services to prepare and sign the documentation required for Local Nature Reserve designation in association with Kent Wildlife Trust. 1.3 Reasons for Recommendation 1.3.1 On the 27 th February 2008 Maidstone Borough Council designated an area of land known as Boxley Warren as a Local Nature Reserve. The Boxley Warren site is shown edged in red on the attached plan, Appendix 1 . Since designation Boxley Warren has been visited and used as a Local Nature Reserve, and the site includes that part of Westfield Wood which lies immediately to the south east of the site currently leased to KWT. 1.3.2 Under an Agreement dated 18 th January 1977 KWT leases a section of Westfield Wood (about a 13.3 acre site, shown edged red on the attached plan, Appendix 2) from Maidstone Borough Council in its capacity as the corporate trustee for the registered charity known as the Cobtree Manor Estate and on a year to year lease for a nominal sum of rent at twenty five pounds per annum to exercise their objectives and two pounds per annum ground rent.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteering With
    Volunteering with... West Kent Wednesday Team Various locations across west Kent Come and join the original KWT Green Team group, we have been going for almost 20 years. We work on a variety of sites from Sittingbourne to Sevenoaks to Staplehurst, going somewhere different every week in the KWT landrover. Does this sound like your kind of adventure? We’re lead by Steve Weeks, Medway Valley Warden, who has been working with Kent Wildlife Trust for many years, alongside some experienced and knowledgeable volunteer team leaders. We love sharing our enthusiasm and skills and welcome all levels of ability. Working on almost every habitat type in Kent, there is a huge variety to do. With this team if you hang around long enough there isn't a job you wont get the chance to be involved with! Why is it important? The Green Team are responsible for main- taining the reserves when there is no project funding to do the work. They are the glue that holds the reserves together year in, year out Task Info regardless. Without their help many of our smaller, wilder, quiet or hidden sites would Spring & Summer really struggle to hang on to their wildlife val- Construction such as fencing, boardwalks or ue. gates. Summer is weeding and surveying. Commitment: every Wednesday at various Autumn & Winter locations. Come weekly, monthly or on an ad- Winter is all about cutting stuff down and hoc basis. having a big bonfire, sometimes small Training: Full training is given and you’ll only woody regrowth of a chalk grassland, some- be asked to do work you are comfortable with.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Tottington's Sarsen Stones
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society GREAT T O T T I N G T O N ' S S A R S E N S T O N E S PAUL ASHBEE Whereas the sarsen stone-built long barrow remains on Blue Bell Hill have been noticed and described since the sixteenth century (Ashbee 1993), no more than incidental mention has been made of the many stones, grouped and isolated, which were at one time to be seen on the lower land skirting Great Tottington. Spreads of substantial stones, brought down from the heights by periglacial solifluxion, were to be found in Westfield Wood and behind the Lower Bell Inn, while, at one time, there were scattered boulders from Burham to Boxley and Bearsted. At Tottington, in the nineteenth century, an array of stones, large and small, were seen to lie around the farmyard; while others, some substantial, rested on the banks and in the spring-head which fed the pools and moat. Similarly, such sarsen stones were also a feature of the Cossington spring-head, almost a mile to the east. From the eighteenth century onwards, antiquarians and various archaeol- ogists have speculated, regarding these as erstwhile circles and avenues. Sadly, Great Tottington's sarsen stones, like those higher upon Blue Bell Hill, have been neither planned nor examined in detail. Thus little is known of the size and characteristics of those that remain. Moreover, they have never been systematically counted, writers merely remarking upon 'large numbers', although Dunkin (1871, 75) saw more than fifty blocks in the farmyard and a group of eight close by.
    [Show full text]