The European Pentarchy and the Congress of Verona, 1822 the Europeanpentarchy and the Congress of Verona, 1822

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The European Pentarchy and the Congress of Verona, 1822 the Europeanpentarchy and the Congress of Verona, 1822 THE EUROPEAN PENTARCHY AND THE CONGRESS OF VERONA, 1822 THE EUROPEANPENTARCHY AND THE CONGRESS OF VERONA, 1822 by IRBY C. NICHOLS, JR. North Texas State University MARTINUS NIJHOFF / THE HAGUE I 1971 @ 1971 by Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands All rights reserved, including the right to translate or to reproduce this book or parts thereof in any form ISBN-13: 978-90-247-1110-9 e-ISBN-13: 978-94-010-2725-0 DOl: 10.1007/978-94-010-2725-0 TO MY MOTHER PAULINE WRIGHT NICHOLS AND THE MEMORY OF MY FATHER IRBY COGHILL NICHOLS WHO INSPIRED ME TO BECOME A DISCIPLE OF CLIO CONTENTS PREFACE XI PART I GENESIS OF THE CONGRESS: FEBRUARY 1821-0CTOBER 1822 1 PROLOGUE THE DIPLOMATIC BACKGROUND OF THE CoNGRESS 3 1. The Congress is called 3 2. The Eastern Question 5 3. The Hanoverian Rendezvous 8 4. The Shift from Castlereagh to Canning 13 CHAPTER I THE ROAD TO VIENNA 19 1. The Castlereagh Instructions 19 2. The Wellington Mission 23 3. The Ascendancy of Villele 25 4. Franco-Spanish Relations, 1820-1822 27 5. The Villele-Wellington Interview 34 CHAPTER II THE VIENNA STALEMATE 40 1. The Conference Convenes 40 2. The Spanish Question 42 3. The Eastern Question 48 4. Italian Questions 54 5. A Retrospect 59 VIII CONTENTS PARTn THE CONGRESS AT WORK: OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1822 63 CHAPTER ill FROM VmNNA TO VERONA: PRELlMINARmS TO THE CoNGRESS 65 1. Exodus 65 2. The Canning Instructions 68 3. The Villcle Instructions 72 4. Reunion in Verona: The Congress at Play 75 5. Agenda and Procedure 81 CHAPTER IV THE SPANISH QUESTION 84 1. The Montmorency Mbnoire 84 2. The British Remonstrance and Allied Reaction 88 3. Dichotomy of the French Delegation 107 4. Triumph of the Franco-Russian Entente 112 5. International Finance and Intervention: The Brothers Rothschild and Ouvrard 127 6. A Retrospect 133 CHAPTER V THE SPANISH CoLONIAL QUESTION 137 1. Genesis 137 2. Wellington's Dissent 144 3. The Villcle-Montmorency Vendetta Revisited 145 4. The British Brief 147 5. The AngIo-Continental Impasse 148 6. The Gameiro Affair 151 7. The British Reservation 154 8. A Retrospect 159 CHAPTER VI THE SLAVB TRADE QUESTION 161 1. Genesis 161 2. The Impossible Quest 165 3. The Black Tide 171 4. The Six Points 176 CONTENTS IX 5. The Implacable French and Diffident Allies 180 6. A Retrospect 186 7. Epilogue 189 CHAPTER VII THE ITALIAN CONGRESS 191 1. The Charles Albert Affair 191 2. The Evacuation of Piedmont 195 3. The Evacuation of Naples 200 4. Metternich's Italian League (Lega Ita/ica) 205 5. The Sardinian Waldenses 211 6. The Swiss Confederation and Piedmontese Refugees 212 7. The Knights of Malta 215 8. The Aldobrandini Appeal 215 9. A Retrospect 216 CHAPTER VIII GREAT BRITAIN AND THE GOLDEN MAXIM 218 1. The Austrian War Debt 218 2. The Russian Ukase 229 3. The Eastern Question 244 4. The Navigation of the Rhine 258 5. A Retrospect 262 CHAPTER IX THE CURTAIN FALLS 264 1. The Verona Circular (December 14, 1822) 264 2. Exodus 266 3. The Second ViIlele-Wellington Interview 267 4. A Retrospect 272 PART III PROBLEMS IN HISTORIOGRAPHY AND INTERPRETATION 275 CHAPTER X WELLINGTON AND THE CoNGRESS 277 1. The Alleged Crime 277 2. The Prosecution 277 x CONTENTS 3. The Defense 280 4. The Verdict 284 CHAPTER XI CHATEAUBRIAND AND THE CONGRESS 286 1. The Debate 286 2. Ambition and Intrigue 288 3. The Mission 292 4. Reception at Verona 295 5. A Retrospect 299 CHAPTER XU CHATEAUBRIAND'S WAR 302 1. The French Ministerial Crisis (December 1822) 302 2. France Goes It Alone 307 3. Britain Adopts Neutrality 312 4. A Retrospect 315 EPILOGUE FROM CoNGRESS SYSTEM TO CONCERT OF EUROPE 317 1. The Secret Treaty of Verona 317 2. The Congress and the Alliance 320 3. Fall of the Alliance 321 4. The Legacy 324 BmuOGRAPHY 327 INDEX 349 PREFACE For one reason or another. modem historians have neglected the Congress of Verona. some because they thought the field already had been thoroughly plowed. while others doubted that enough material could be found for more than an article or two on the subject. Indeed. not a single book-length monograph of this international assembly has ever been published in any language. This study. therefore. attempts to fill the gap by (1) explaining the genesis of the Congress. (2) furnishing a comprehensive account of its work. (3) revising some of the interpretations of Sir Charles K. Webster. Harold W. V. Tempedey. and others. and (4) analyzing the significance of the Congress. with emphasis on its contribution to the fall of the Quintuple Alliance. a consequence aided by the dissimilar and often contradictory interests of the allies themselves. This book is essentially a diplomatic history. but diplomats. of course. do not live in a vacuum. Numerous political. social. commercial. financial. and sometimes even religious factors. impinge upon their consciousness. It soon became apparent. therefore. that the scope of this work would be enormous and that its span would stretch from the eighteenth to the twentieth century. if the alpha and omega of every issue discussed at Verona were recounted. Yet anything less than a catholic approach would reduce the claim of comprehensive coverage to an empty pretense. Included within the purview of the study. perforce. are questions which range from Black Sea commerce to the Atlantic slave trade. from the Greek insurrection to Latin American independence. from the navigation of the Rhine to the interdiction of foreign trade with Russian America. and from intervention in the Iberian Peninsula to the persecution of Piedmontese Vaudois. The present volume is an outgrowth of researches which began twenty­ three years ago in Professor James Logan Godfrey's seminar at the Uni­ versity of North Carolina. By 1949 the paper had grown into a master's thesis which six years later at the University of Michigan envolved into a doctoral dissertation: "Great Britain and the Congress of Verona." But hardly more than the foundation for this work had been laid. for the greater XII PREFACE task of giving equal and adequate treatment to the diplomacy of the four great continental powers remained. There were. moreover. other important questions which required investigation: what impact. if any. did the negoti­ ations at Verona have upon the balance of power in Europe. the foreign policy of the United States. or on Habsburg hegemony in Italy? Nonetheless. the obvious need for a central theme in the midst of involved negotiations on multitudinous issues led me to retain the focus on British diplomacy. Of all the great powers. only Britain. by virtue of her empire. commerce. and ambivalent position in Europe (at once insular and continental). had interests which were truly global. Further research. writing. revision. and the occasional pUblication of findings have occupied my attention for the last decade and a half. For the sake of clarity. I have modernized the spelling and punctuation of most quotations - retaining some archaic forms for their dramatic effect - and have translated foreign titles of nobility and office into English. Also to avoid confusion. all Old Style dates have been converted to New Style. During the nineteenth century. the Russian. Old Style calendar was twelve days in arrears of the Gregorian. New Style calendar. Both the organization of this book and my own historiographical creed hang on five basic assumptions. First. the author should take the reader into his confidence at frequent intervals. not just in the Preface and the concluding chapter. Secondly. the essence of history is problems. not chroni­ cles. though no theory of historical interpretation or system of social dialectics in definitive. because such factors as human courage. faith. and ambition are indefinable and unpredictable. Thirdly. notwithstanding the influence of complex material forces. accidents and men's free choice also have produced dynamic results throughout the continuum of history. Does not aio often seem capricious? Fourthly. symbols. such as the martyred Joan of Arc or the modem propaganda image. are sometimes greater than the reality. Fifthly. the interpretation of events is the proper function of the historian and is as important as their narration. Since analyses are subjective and cannot be guaranteed. however. each reader must judge for himself whether a particular conclusion is astute or naive. proven or unwarrented. germane or irrelevant. In conformity with these suppositions. at least one section of each chapter analyzes problems of causation. relationships. and significance. while all of Part III (three chapters and the Epilogue). focuses on questions of historiography and interpretation. Most of the published materials for this study and all of the manuscript collections (except the Adams Papers). are deposited in London. at the British Museum and the Public Record Office. and in Paris. at the Biblio- PREFACE XIII theque Nationale and the Quai d'Orsay. While I have not consulted the governmental archives of Vienna, Berlin, and Leningrad (St. Petersburg), this omission, in my opinion, does not present any serious difficulty in understanding the policies of those cabinets. The British and French archives, especially the embassy files, contain rich deposits of documents pertaining to the diplomacy of the three eastern courts, and these holdings are supplemented by many published collections of Austrian, Prussian, and Russian diplomatic dispatches, memoirs, and diaries. Almost all of the Austrian papers found in the Vienna Staatsarchiv, Kongressakten, Verona, Fascs. 43, 45, and 50, moreover, have been printed in Wellington's new Despatches. Vol. I. I have, of course, made use of the secondary accounts of historians who have labored in foreign archives: Bertier de Sauvigny, Cresson, Schroeder, Sweet, Temperley, and Webster, among others.
Recommended publications
  • 9781501756030 Revised Cover 3.30.21.Pdf
    , , Edited by Christine D. Worobec For a list of books in the series, visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. From Victory to Peace Russian Diplomacy aer Napoleon • Elise Kimerling Wirtschaer Copyright © by Cornell University e text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives . International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/./. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Cornell University Press, Sage House, East State Street, Ithaca, New York . Visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. First published by Cornell University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Wirtschaer, Elise Kimerling, author. Title: From victory to peace: Russian diplomacy aer Napoleon / by Elise Kimerling Wirtschaer. Description: Ithaca [New York]: Northern Illinois University Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press, . | Series: NIU series in Slavic, East European, and Eurasian studies | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Identiers: LCCN (print) | LCCN (ebook) | ISBN (paperback) | ISBN (pdf) | ISBN (epub) Subjects: LCSH: Russia—Foreign relations—–. | Russia—History— Alexander I, –. | Europe—Foreign relations—–. | Russia—Foreign relations—Europe. | Europe—Foreign relations—Russia. Classication: LCC DK.W (print) | LCC DK (ebook) | DDC ./—dc LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/ LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/ Cover image adapted by Valerie Wirtschaer. is book is published as part of the Sustainable History Monograph Pilot. With the generous support of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the Pilot uses cutting-edge publishing technology to produce open access digital editions of high-quality, peer-reviewed monographs from leading university presses.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress System”: the World’S First “International Security Regime”1
    The “Congress System”: The World’s First “International Security Regime”1 © 2015 Mark Jarrett In his State Paper of May 5, 1820, British Foreign Secretary Lord Castlereagh argued that the post-Napoleonic alliance of great powers was never intended as a “union for the government of the world, or for the superintendence of the internal affairs of other states.”2 Notwithstanding Castlereagh’s powerful denial, was this new system, known to historians as the “Congress System,” an attempt at great-power supervision of the rest of Europe? Was it, as Professor Beatrice de Graaf has suggested, a new type of “security regime,” or as Dr. Stella Ghervas contends, a novel and innovative approach for the maintenance of peace after two decades of bloodshed? Was this new system, as Professor Brian Vick asserts, inextricably linked to constitutionalism—perhaps constitutionalism extended to Europe at large? A handful of scholars would deny that this system existed at all, or at least they would argue that its impact was negligible. Others go to the opposite extreme and see it as part of a new system of norms and self-restraint that replaced traditional balance of power rivalries.3 And still others would decry its existence as a repressive conspiracy of monarchs against their own peoples. My contention is simply that there was such a system. My focus will be on the set of concrete institutions created in Paris in November 1815, which loosely bound together the European great powers during the first decade after the Napoleonic Wars. The Congress System was indeed, despite Castlereagh’s later disavowal, an audacious attempt at multilateral world government, but it never developed a strong institutional basis and eventually foundered on differences between the powers over the question of counter- revolutionary intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pilgrim of Historiography: Byron and the Discourses of History in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain
    A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato A Pilgrim of Historiography: Byron and the Discourses of History in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain Ivan Pregnolato, BA, MA Thesis Submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2015 Page 1 of 363 A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato Abstract This thesis aims to understand Byron’s œuvre in relation to the discourses of history in early nineteenth-century Britain. As a contribution to the historicist critical approaches of the past decades, my dissertation discusses the different ideas surrounding the concept of ‘history’ in the first two decades of the 1800s, a period marked by change. As shown, these discourses of history were notorious for their heterogeneity and, by analysing Byron’s poetry and letters, it becomes evident that Byron engaged with these multiple interpretations as well. Roughly, three types of discourses of history are discussed below: the classical knowledge which was perpetuated in the educational system of the time and discussed in travelogues; the whig interpretation of history and the teleological concept of ‘liberty’ through time; and the idea of powerful forces that act ‘behind’ history, such as economics and the inseparability of power embedded in creating historical narratives. This thesis concludes that is impossible to speak of a single Byronic historical narrative and, rather, argues that Byron’s texts espouse pluralistic conceptualisations of history. Page 2 of 363 A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato To my mother ‘A fila anda…’ Page 3 of 363 A Pilgrim of Historiography – Ivan Pregnolato Acknowledgements Several people have helped me in the years that it has taken to write this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turks in Europe (1919)
    wmfni\ f/t 5 \ii'^/Mr<,'^/1''i i P 1 1, 1 f '' ' '^ li ^ ^1 THE TURKS IN EUROPE A 2 Qu'est ce que la Turqiiie ? La Turquie est le pays classique dea massacres. Son con- histoire se resume k ceci : pillages, meurtres, vols, cussions— sur toutes les echelles—revoltes, insurrections, repressions, guerres ^trangeres, guerres civiles, revolutions, contre-r^volutions, seditions, mutineries. ARsi:NE Perlant, Eternelle Turquie. " a is To murder a man is a crime ; to massacre nation a question." , Victor Hugo, 1876. THE TURKS IN EUROPE A SKETCH-STUDY BY W. E. D. ALLEN WITH A PREFACE BY BRIG.-GEN. H. CONYERS SURTEES, C.M.G., D.S.O. LONDON JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET 1919 f; All rights r«s«rved. DEDICATION To My Beloved Father— To you I dedicate this chronicle of men's savageness and meanness. To you, who brilliant so so faultless were so and simple ; your- tolerant of fault in others so self yet so ; gentle not kill a bird so kind that men that you could ; so that marvelled ; forbearing they thought you weak so that fool. ; generous they thought you You were so quick of comprehension, yet so patient of stupidity in others. You could always forgive, and always understand. Men wondered when you repaid vilest ingratitude with renewed kindness. You who so loved Music and Books and Art, and to roam in the wild places of the earth, and linger in its ancient cities, were for ever im- prisoned in an office. You began to work when to learn the best most boys begin ; you spent years of your life in drudgery, working often till mid- night.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great European Treaties of the Nineteenth Century
    JBRART Of 9AN DIEGO OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY EDITED BY SIR AUGUSTUS OAKES, CB. LATELY OF THE FOREIGN OFFICE AND R. B. MOWAT, M.A. FELLOW AND ASSISTANT TUTOR OF CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE, OXFORD WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY SIR H. ERLE RICHARDS K. C.S.I., K.C., B.C.L., M.A. FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE AWD CHICHELE PROFESSOR OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND DIPLOMACY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD ASSOCIATE OF THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW OXFORD AT THE CLARENDON PRESS OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AMEN HOUSE, E.C. 4 LONDON EDINBURGH GLASGOW LEIPZIG NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE CAPETOWN BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS SHANGHAI HUMPHREY MILFORD PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY Impression of 1930 First edition, 1918 Printed in Great Britain INTRODUCTION IT is now generally accepted that the substantial basis on which International Law rests is the usage and practice of nations. And this makes it of the first importance that the facts from which that usage and practice are to be deduced should be correctly appre- ciated, and in particular that the great treaties which have regulated the status and territorial rights of nations should be studied from the point of view of history and international law. It is the object of this book to present materials for that study in an accessible form. The scope of the book is limited, and wisely limited, to treaties between the nations of Europe, and to treaties between those nations from 1815 onwards. To include all treaties affecting all nations would require volumes nor is it for the many ; necessary, purpose of obtaining a sufficient insight into the history and usage of European States on such matters as those to which these treaties relate, to go further back than the settlement which resulted from the Napoleonic wars.
    [Show full text]
  • British Foreign Policy Under Canning
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2008 British Foreign Policy Under Canning Andrew Montgomery Endorf The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Endorf, Andrew Montgomery, "British Foreign Policy Under Canning" (2008). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 160. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/160 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BRITISH FOREIGN POLICY UNDER CANNING By Andrew Montgomery Endorf B.A., University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, 2004 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In History The University of Montana Missoula, MT Summer 2008 Approved by: Perry Brown Associate Provost for Graduate Studies Dr. John Eglin, Chair History Dr. Linda Frey History Dr. Louis Hayes Political Science i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE – CANNING THE POLITICIAN 12 Biography 12 Domestic Politics 16 CHAPTER TWO – REVOLUTION ON THE IBERIAN PENNINSULA 24 Spain 24 Portugal 36 CHAPTER THREE – LATIN AMERICA AND RECOGNITION 44 North America 48 Latin America 52 CHAPTER FOUR – GREECE AND THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 66 Stalemate and Neutrality 68 Shifting Alliances and Intervention 77 CONCLUSION 86 BIBLIOGRAPHY 99 ii Endorf, Andrew, M.A., Summer 2008 History British Foreign Policy Under Canning Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • (1821-1827)1 I Henry Middleton of South Carolina Was Appointed United States Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary (T
    James J. F assolas An American Ambassador at the Court of St. Petersburg, Russia: Henry Middleton of South Carolina and John Capodistrias (1821-1827)1 I Henry Middleton of South Carolina was appointed United States Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary (the equivalent of present day Ambassador), to the Court of St. Petersburg, Russia, in the fall of 1820 and served at that post until the summer of 1830. During his ten-year diplomatic assignment to the Russian capital, he left A volumi­ nous correspondence of dispatches, letters, memoranda, notes, and vari­ ous papers and documents, covering the broad spectrum of Russian- American relations, European politics and diplomacy, and the Greek Revolution, beginning with Alexander Ypsilanti’s insurrection in the Romanian Principalities in March of 1821 and up to the conclusion of the Treaty of Adrianople and the recognition of Greece’s independence by the Sublime Porte in 1829 and later by the Great powers12. 1. In preparing this tudy, I would like to thank the International Research and Exchange Board (IREX), which provided A research grant to Romania and Greece in 1976-1977, and the School of Humanities and Fine Arts, Coastal CarolinA University - Conway-Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for granting me A Sabbatical leave from my teaching duties in 1991. 2. Middleton’s diplomatic correspondence from Russia covers the period from February 2, 1820 through July 27, 1830. His correspondence is deposited in the U.S. National Archives, Microfilm Publications, Microcopy No 35, “Despatches from United States Minis­ ters to Russia, 1808-1906”, Rolls 8-11, Volumes 8-11 (The National Archives and Record Service, General Service Administration: Washington, 1953).
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 1219:30 Jan 1219:31 Jan 1219:31 Jan 1219:31 Jan 1219:31 Jan 1219:34
    THE VIENNA CONGRESS The defeat of France didn’t remove the threat of international revolution and 1) Riding the Tiger war. One major objective with the viennasettlement was to maintain peace and To those rulers who believed it would be impoissible to dam the forces of stability. The Austrian chancellor, Prince Metternich introduced the idea of revolution completely the solution would be to attract support for the some sort of league between European rulers which would maintain the government and weaken the revolutionary forces by making moderate reforms. settlement and police the continent (The Metternich system). It was to be in Britain in the 1820s­40s where this policy was most succesfully applied. A series of economic, social and political reforms enabled the To the ruling classes in Europe the French revolution had been an traumatic aristocracy to maintain the real power and attract the support of the middle­ experience and one concluded that once change started it would get out of classes. control and produce chaos, terror, military dictatorship and international war. The rulers came up with two possible responses to this situation; jan 12­19:30 jan 12­19:31 2) Stemming the Torrent ASSESSING WHETHER THE PEACEMAKERS IN 1815 WERE GUIDED BY The more conservative rulers on the contrary feared that reforms would NATIONAL INTERESTS OR BY IDEALS AND PRINCIPLES. trigger off revolution. An obvious alternative was to stop the whole process of change before it had a chance to start. Metternich was the main architect of this view. jan 12­19:31 jan 12­19:31 .A.
    [Show full text]
  • Interconf» | № 53 the Impact of the Verona Conference
    SCIENTIFIC COLLECTION «INTERCONF» | № 53 Sadraddinova Gulnara Eldar Doctoral Candidate, Baku State University, Republic of Azerbaijan THE IMPACT OF THE VERONA CONFERENCE AND THE AKKERMAN AGREEMENTS ON THE GREEK REBELLION Abstract. At the Congress of Verona, held by members of the Holy Alliance in October 1822, Russia wanted to use it to carry out its insidious policy against the Ottoman state. Unable to do so, however, Tsarist Russia encouraged foreign powers to intervene in the Gr eek uprising. As a result, on October 7, 1826, the Akkerman Treaty was signed in an unfair political environment for the Ottoman state. This agreement represents an important stage in Ottoman-Russian political relations and in the formation of a map of the Balkans. However, this was a stage of development against the Turks and strengthened Russia's influence in the Balkans. Keywords: Congress of Verona, Akkerman Convention, Ottoman, Tstarist Russia, greek rebellion. The Ottoman Empire, weakened for internal and external reasons in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, faced political confrontation during the Greek uprising that began in 1821. The situation of the Ottoman state became even more tense as the rebels, who took advantage of the privileges granted to the Greeks by the Ottoman government, relied on the help of European states. Although the rebellion was organized by the Filiki Etherya Society, its secret leader was Tsarist Russia. Tsarist Russia, through the newly independent Greek state, wanted to strengthen its position in the Balkans and realize its plans for the Mediterranean. The interference of European states in the Greek question, which sought to thwart Tsarist Russia's intentions, led to the development of international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Byron Departs for Greece on July 16Th, Arriving in Cephalonia on August 3Rd
    1 BYRON’S CORRESPONDENCE AND JOURNALS 13: FROM GREECE, JULY 1823-APRIL 1824 Edited by Peter Cochran Abbreviations B.: Byron; H.: Hobhouse; K.: Kinnaird; Mu.: Murray 1922: Lord Byron’s Correspondence Chiefly with Lady Melbourne, Mr Hobhouse, The Hon. Douglas Kinnaird, and P.B.Shelley (2 vols., John Murray 1922). BB: Byron’s Bulldog: The Letters of John Cam Hobhouse to Lord Byron, ed. Peter W.Graham (Columbus Ohio 1984). BLJ: Byron, George Gordon, Lord. Byron’s Letters and Journals. Ed. Leslie A. Marchand, (13 vols. London: John Murray 1973–94). Gamba: Pietro Gamba. A Narrative of Lord Byron’s Last Journey to Greece, (John Murray, 1825). LJ: The Works of Lord Byron, Letters and Journals. Ed. R. E. Prothero, 6 vols. (London: John Murray, 1899-1904). Parry: William Parry, The Last Days of Lord Byron (Knight and Lacey, 1825). Q: Byron: A Self-Portrait; Letters and Diaries 1798 to 1824. Ed. Peter Quennell (2 vols, John Murray, 1950). Stanhope: Leicester Stanhope, Greece in 1823 and 1824 (Sherwood and Jones 1824). Codes: Names of writer and recipient are in bold type, with location from which sent, and date. (Source is given in round brackets beneath the title: “text from” indicates that the actual source has been seen). Where the manuscript is the source, the text is left-justified only. Where the source is a book, the text is left- and right-justified. [The address, if there is one, is given in square brackets beneath the source] “1:2” and so on indicates a page-turn on the bifolium. “1:2 and 1:3 blank” shows that not all the paper has been used.
    [Show full text]
  • READER! This Edition Gives You a Raw Version of Byron's Correspondence. As Far As Can Be Done in Linear Print, It Conveys What
    1 BYRON’S CORRESPONDENCE AND JOURNALS 16: FROM GREECE, JULY 1823-APRIL 1824 Edited by Peter Cochran Work in progress, with frequent updates [indicated]. Letters not in the seventeen main files may be found in those containing the correspondences Byron / Annbella, Byron / Murray, Byron / Hobhouse, Byron / Moore, Byron / Scott, Byron / Kinnaird, Byron / The Shelleys , or Byron / Hoppner . UPDATED March 2011. Abbreviations B.: Byron; H.: Hobhouse; K.: Kinnaird; Mu.: Murray 1922: Lord Byron’s Correspondence Chiefly with Lady Melbourne, Mr Hobhouse, The Hon. Douglas Kinnaird, and P.B.Shelley (2 vols., John Murray 1922). BB: Byron’s Bulldog: The Letters of John Cam Hobhouse to Lord Byron, ed. Peter W.Graham (Columbus Ohio 1984). BLJ: Byron, George Gordon, Lord. Byron’s Letters and Journals . Ed. Leslie A. Marchand, 13 vols. London: John Murray 1973–94. Gamba: Pietro Gamba. A Narrative of Lord Byron’s Last Journey to Greece , (John Murray, 1825). LJ: The Works of Lord Byron, Letters and Journals . Ed. R. E. Prothero, 6 vols. (London: John Murray, 1899-1904). NLS: National Library of Scotland. Parry: William Parry, The Last Days of Lord Byron (Knight and Lacey, 1825). Q: Byron: A Self-Portrait; Letters and Diaries 1798 to 1824 . Ed. Peter Quennell (2 vols, John Murray, 1950). Stanhope: Leicester Stanhope, Greece in 1823 and 1824 (Sherwood and Jones 1824). I am very grateful to John and Virginia Murray for permission to quote texts from Byron’s Letters and Journals , ed. Leslie A. Marchand (John Murray 1973-1994). READER! This edition gives you a raw version of Byron’s correspondence. As far as can be done in linear print, it conveys what he wrote and how he wrote it, before any editor got to it to neutralise him.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Powers European States System 1814–1914
    Bridge_ppr 2/8/08 12:40 PM Page 1 'This book has the hallmarks of success stamped through it: breadth of scope, SYSTEM 1814–1914 EUROPEAN STATES THE incisive analysis and a lightness of touch in the writing.' GREAT POWERS GREAT Professor John Keiger, University of Salford The Great Powers and the European States System, 1814–1914 is a full analytical narrative of the functioning of the European states system over the nineteenth century between the fall of Napoleon in 1814 and the outbreak of the First World War just one hundred years later. It examines the variety of devices, manoeuvres and feats of statesmanship by means of which decision-makers managed the interplay of their interests, common and conflicting – including the dangerous Eastern Question – without exposing Europe to the catastrophe of a general conflagration: AND THE ➤ systems of active co-operation, such as the ‘Congress system’ or the Concert of Europe ➤ periods of ‘international anarchy’ in which, if wars were endemic they were at least limited ➤ the stabilizing effects of the predominance of conservative status quo Powers in the Bismarckian era ➤ the dangerously polarised system that emerged on the eve of the First World War. At nearly double the length of the first edition, this book is a very major revision and update. It includes not only the results of the latest research, but also a body of THE additional information and a number of illuminating maps that will make the subject even more accessible to readers. GREAT POWERS F.R. Bridge is Emeritus Professor of Diplomatic History, . His SECOND many publications include The Habsburg Monarchy Among the Great Powers, EDITION AND THE 1815–1918 (1990).
    [Show full text]