DOCSLIB.ORG

9781501756030 Revised Cover 3.30.21.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9781501756030 Revised Cover 3.30.21.Pdf , , Edited by Christine D. Worobec For a list of books in the series, visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. From Victory to Peace Russian Diplomacy aer Napoleon • Elise Kimerling Wirtschaer Copyright © by Cornell University e text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives . International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/./. To use this book, or parts of this book, in any way not covered by the license, please contact Cornell University Press, Sage House, East State Street, Ithaca, New York . Visit our website at cornellpress.cornell.edu. First published by Cornell University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Wirtschaer, Elise Kimerling, author. Title: From victory to peace: Russian diplomacy aer Napoleon / by Elise Kimerling Wirtschaer. Description: Ithaca [New York]: Northern Illinois University Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press, . | Series: NIU series in Slavic, East European, and Eurasian studies | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Identiers: LCCN (print) | LCCN (ebook) | ISBN (paperback) | ISBN (pdf) | ISBN (epub) Subjects: LCSH: Russia—Foreign relations—–. | Russia—History— Alexander I, –. | Europe—Foreign relations—–. | Russia—Foreign relations—Europe. | Europe—Foreign relations—Russia. Classication: LCC DK.W (print) | LCC DK (ebook) | DDC ./—dc LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/ LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/ Cover image adapted by Valerie Wirtschaer. is book is published as part of the Sustainable History Monograph Pilot. With the generous support of the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the Pilot uses cutting-edge publishing technology to produce open access digital editions of high-quality, peer-reviewed monographs from leading university presses. Free digital editions can be downloaded from: Books at JSTOR, EBSCO, Hathi Trust, Internet Archive, OAPEN, Project MUSE, and many other open repositories. While the digital edition is free to download, read, and share, the book is under copyright and covered by the following Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC-ND .. Please consult www.creativecommons.org if you have questions about your rights to reuse the material in this book. When you cite the book, please include the following URL for its Digital Object Identier (DOI): https://doi.org/./dmr-f We are eager to learn more about how you discovered this title and how you are using it. We hope you will spend a few minutes answering a couple of questions at this url: https://www.longleafservices.org/shmp-survey/ More information about the Sustainable History Monograph Pilot can be found at https://www.longleafservices.org. To my soulshine, Landon and Papy • Preface xi Acknowledgments xv Abbreviations xvii Note on Dating xix Russia as a Great Power in Europe Pacication and Peace (–) Completion of the General Alliance (–) Alliance Unity and Intervention in Naples (–) ­ To Act in Concert (–) Spain and the European System (– ) Russia’s European Diplomacy Appendix. Biographies of Diplomats Notes Bibliography Contrary to Russia’s present-day position on the political and psychological periphery of Europe, the period from the end of the Napoleonic Wars to the Crimean War ( –), and arguably until the Bolshevik Revolution of Octo- ber , represented a time of full integration into European society and poli- tics. During this period, the Quadruple Alliance, the general alliance, the grand alliance, and the European political system stood as cornerstones of Russian diplomacy. Russia had led the allied coalition that defeated Napoleon in –­, its armies had performed heroically and honorably in , and its emperor had come to be seen by his subjects and intimates as the divinely anointed savior of Europe. From the Russian point of view, the glorious victory of and the sub- sequent wars leading to Napoleon’s dethronement showed that Emperor Alex- ander I (ruled –) and his people, together with their allies, served as God’s instrument in human history. Not surprisingly, in the eyes of Russia’s monarch and diplomats, the peace settlement reached in ­–, and the peacemaking that continued in subsequent years, appeared equally providential. e basic contours of what contemporaries referred to as the European polit- ical system were forged at the “Congress” of Westphalia, where rulers and diplo- mats recognized state sovereignty (not empire, dynasty, or religious belief) as the foundation of European order. Based on the principle that state sovereignty gave to each government the right to choose a domestic religion and political structure, free from the threat of outside intervention, the peacemakers also embraced the principle of a balance of power between independent states that aimed to preserve European equilibrium and prevent any one country from becoming powerful enough to achieve hegemony. Ultimately, the treaties of Westphalia failed to stop revolutionary France from overturning the equilibrium or Napoleonic France from dominating Europe. us, once Napoleon had been defeated militarily, it became necessary to reconstruct the European state system. Aer roughly twen- ty-ve years of brutal warfare, fragile coalitions, and exhausting diplomacy, the continent’s rulers and diplomats were eager to establish an enduring peace and prepared to make substantive compromises to achieve that goal. In a series of multilateral treaties, conventions, and protocols—produced primarily but not xi xii Preface exclusively in Paris and at the Congress of Vienna in ­–—political leaders reconstituted the public law of Europe, which then provided the legal framework for interstate diplomacy and relations between governments and peoples. Generations of historians have researched the chess game of European politics during the French Revolution, the Napoleonic Empire, and the peacemaking that followed the victory over France. e quality of this scholarship is impres- sive, yet the diplomacy of the era continues to fascinate and bae. In recent de- cades, the reconstruction of Europe at the Congress of Vienna has been seen as a model of multilateral diplomacy and collective security arrangements that estab- lished precedents for today’s United Nations and European Union. In addition, historians have moved beyond simplistic characterizations of Russia’s actions, recognizing instead the critical and oen salutary role of Emperor Alexander I. Scholarly perspectives have become diversied; however, signicant aspects of European politics in the Restoration era remain understudied. ese include the conceptual apparatus developed in diplomatic discourse and the relationship of diplomacy to national or local political cultures. Among the great powers of Restoration Europe, the Russian Empire is the least integrated into both past and current historiography. rough study of Russian diplomacy in the years – , this book broadens the knowledge base available to historians and helps to ll a striking historiographical gap. Begin- ning in the immediate aermath of the Congress of Vienna and continuing through the Congress of Verona, Europe’s statesmen worked tirelessly to im- plement the edice of pacication and peace constructed in ­, , and . ey completed territorial negotiations, codied political arrangements, and brought a defeated France back into the alliance of great powers. Equally sig- nicant, they confronted dangerous revolts and military crises in Europe, the Ottoman Empire, and Spanish America. In response to these developments, Emperor Alexander’s hopes for peace, his pragmatic adaptability, and his com- mitment to act in concert with the other great powers came fully into focus. Close attention to Russian diplomacy, based on sources of Russian provenance, challenges characterizations of Alexander’s behavior as erratic and his foreign policy as heavy-handed and expansionist. Indeed, as historians assimilate the Russian perspective on European order (as well as the perspectives of other less well-studied countries and peoples), they encounter a multifaceted Restoration built upon the practices of enlightened reformism and direct experience of costly revolution and war. Decades have passed since European historians began to reevaluate the Eu- ropean restorations and rebalance their understanding of the achievements and Preface xiii consequences of the French Revolution. e research presented here contrib- utes in multiple ways to debates about the Restoration. As noted, this book highlights Russian diplomacy, which continues to occupy a peripheral and un- derstudied position in European historiography. It does so, moreover, not by analyzing political maneuvers in the high stakes game of diplomatic chess, but by exploring the ideas and concepts that dened Russian foreign policy. e conceptual history of diplomacy leads in turn to emphasis on the dynamics of peacemaking over more familiar themes such as empire building, the emergence of ethno-nationalism, or the struggle between “progress” and “reaction.” Finally, this book focuses on the intersection of principle and action in order to un- derstand how Emperor Alexander and his diplomatic agents presented Russian foreign policy to Europe and the world, what they thought they were doing (or wanted others to think they were doing), and how they thought they were going to establish and preserve a durable peace. Concrete investigation of what it meant to act in concert (concerter) encour- ages a deeper, more nuanced
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Memoirs of General the Baron De Marbot in 2 Volumes
    The Memoirs of General the Baron de Marbot in 2 Volumes by the Baron de Marbot THE MEMOIRS OF GENERAL THE BARON DE MARBOT. Table of Contents THE MEMOIRS OF GENERAL THE BARON DE MARBOT......................................1 Volume I....................................................................2 Introduction...........................................................2 Chap. 1................................................................6 Chap. 2...............................................................11 Chap. 3...............................................................17 Chap. 4...............................................................24 Chap. 5...............................................................31 Chap. 6...............................................................39 Chap. 7...............................................................41 Chap. 8...............................................................54 Chap. 9...............................................................67 Chap. 10..............................................................75 Chap. 11..............................................................85 Chap. 12..............................................................96 Chap. 13.............................................................102 Chap. 14.............................................................109 Chap. 15.............................................................112 Chap. 16.............................................................122 Chap. 17.............................................................132
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H1296
    H1296 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE March 29, 2006 One hundred and eighty-five years It was this concept, Mr. Speaker, There was no objection. ago, the people of Greece began a jour- that the Founding Fathers of the The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a ney that would mark the symbolic United States of America drew heavily previous order of the House, the gentle- birth of democracy in a land where upon in forming our representative woman from California (Ms. WOOLSEY) those principles to human dignity were government. is recognized for 5 minutes. first espoused. This past Saturday, Constitutionally, democracy has Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr. Speaker, for a March 25, marked the 185th anniver- made the American way of life pos- President whose party controls both sary of the Greek struggle for inde- sible. For that contribution alone, we Houses of Congress, the Supreme Court pendence. It was an historic day for all owe a heavy debt to the Greek people, and, of course, the White House bully people who treasure freedom. but the contribution of democracy was pulpit itself, George W. Bush has cer- In 1821, after four centuries of Otto- not the only contribution made by tainly had an awful lot of explaining to man rule, Greeks rose up in arms, Greek patriots to American society. do lately. fought valiantly and finally achieved a The ancient Greeks contributed a With all the power at his disposal, dream centuries old, freedom from great deal both to our cultural herit- starting with a knee-jerk legislature Turkish oppression. In setting their age, as well as to European culture, in all too ready to follow his lead, lock, blood for liberty and winning their the areas of art, philosophy, science stock and barrel, the President should freedom, Greeks showed the world and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State University Libraries
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2018 Alexander Pushkin and Gannibal: A Self Reclamation Caroline M. Pryor Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ALEXANDER PUSHKIN AND GANNIBAL: A SELF RECLAMATION By CAROLINE M. PRYOR A Thesis submitted to the Department of Modern Languages & Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2018 Caroline M. Pryor defended this thesis on April 23, 2018. The members of the supervisory committee were: Lisa Ryoko Wakamiya Professor Directing Thesis Robert Romanchuk Committee Member Nina Efimov Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii This thesis is dedicated to all scholars of color who have dedicated themselves to a language where they are seldom seen. Your voice matters. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my wonderful thesis advisor Dr. Lisa Wakamiya of the Slavic Department at Florida State University. Her constant guidance and unwavering support pushed me to reach a wider depth of knowledge. This thesis would not be what it is today without her commentary and input to steer me in the right direction. I would also like to express my gratitude to the members of my committee, Dr. Robert Romanchuk and Dr. Nina Efimov for their support and insight during this process. Last but certainly not least, I would like to thank my partner, family, and friends for their encouragement, late night Strozier sessions, and unending cups of coffee.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Russian History the Search for National Identity and Global Power
    Cognella History of Europe Series Modern Russian History The Search for National Identity and Global Power Roxanne Easley, Mark Davis Kuss, and Thomas Pearson Central Washington University, University of Holy Cross and Monmouth University SAN DIEGO Bassim Hamadeh, CEO and Publisher David Miano, Senior Specialist Acquisitions Editor Michelle Piehl, Senior Project Editor Christian Berk, Production Editor Jess Estrella, Senior Graphic Designer Trey Soto, Licensing Coordinator Natalie Piccotti, Director of Marketing Kassie Graves, Vice President of Editorial Jamie Giganti, Director of Academic Publishing Copyright © 2021 by Cognella, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, repro- duced, transmitted, or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information retrieval system without the written permission of Cognella, Inc. For inquiries regarding permissions, translations, foreign rights, audio rights, and any other forms of reproduction, please contact the Cognella Licensing Department at rights@ cognella.com. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Cover image copyright © 2017 iStockphoto LP/letty17. Printed in the United States of America. Brief Contents A Note on Transliteration, Dates,and Acknowledgments xiii Chapter 1 Introduction: The Russian Empire to 1855 1 PART I. Late Imperial Russia 21 Chapter 2 The Renovation of Autocracy: The Great Reforms and Expansion of the Russian Empire 23 Chapter 3 Opposition to Tsarism: Young Russia and the Imperial Regime Under Attack, 1861–1881 47 Chapter 4 Fateful Reaction: Autocracy Retrenched and the Empire in Flux, 1881–1904 67 PART II.
    [Show full text]
  • 16, We Begin the Publication of His Diary, So As to Possess in One Single Collection All His Writings Relative to the Congregation and His Ascetic and Mystical Life
    St. EUGENE de MAZENOD DIARY (1791 - 1821) Translated by Michael Hughes, O.M.I. Oblate General Archives Via Aurelia, 290 Rome, 1999 Printed by MARIAN PRESS LTD. BATTLEFORD, SASKATCHEWAN, CANADA Table of Contents pp. Introduction ...................................................................................... 7 A Diary of the Exile in Italy (1721-1802).............................. 11 Introduction.................................................................................. 11 T e x t................................................................................................ 19 B Diary of a Stay in Paris (1805) ............................................ 103 Introduction.................................................................................. 103 T e x t................................................................................................ 109 C Diary of the Aix Christian Youth Congregation (1813-1821) ............................................................................... 121 Introduction.................................................................................. 121 T e x t................................................................................................ 233 D Diary of the Mission of Marignane (November 17 - December 1 5 ,1 8 1 6 )................................... 209 Introduction.................................................................................. 209 T ex t................................................................................................ 213 Illustrations
    [Show full text]
  • The Albert Wardin Russian Baptists and Evangelical Sectarians Collection Ar
    1 THE ALBERT WARDIN RUSSIAN BAPTISTS AND EVANGELICAL SECTARIANS COLLECTION AR 915 Baptist baptism in Minusinsk, ca. 1907 August, 2013 Southern Baptist Historical Library and Archives Nashville, Tennessee 2 THE ALBERT WARDIN RUSSIAN BAPTISTS AND EVANGELICAL SECTARIANS COLLECTION AR 915 Summary Main Entry: Albert Wardin Russian Baptists and Evangelical Sectarians Collection Date Span: 1855 – 2012. Abstract: Collection of research notes and material related to Baptists and Evangelical Sectarians in Russia and Eastern Europe. The collection includes articles and publications related to early Christian movements in Russia. Collection also contains significant biographical information on evangelical leaders in Eastern Europe, including Russia. Size: 53 linear ft. (121 boxes) Collection #: AR 915 Biographical/Historical Sketch Albert Wardin, Jr. was born March 11, 1928, the first child of Anna and Albert Wardin of Portland, Oregon. He grew up on the family dairy farm in the Portland area. He received his B.A. degree from Willamette University in Salem, Oregon, in 1946, and, a year later, he received his M.A. in history from Stanford. After Stanford, Wardin went to Western Seminary in Portland, where he got the bachelor of divinity degree. He completed his Ph.D. in history at the University of Oregon, writing his dissertation on Baptists in Oregon. Wardin taught at Western Seminary in Portland for a total of eight years. In 1967, he began a long career as history professor at Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee. He started collecting material on Russian Baptists because of his family connection with Russian Baptists. The family interest collection began in the 1960s and grew to a massive collection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Phase
    The Eastern Question: THE LAST PHASE A STUDY IN GREEK-TURKISH DIPLOMACY Harry J. Psomiades Queens College and The Graduate School The City University of New York With an Introduction by Van Coufoudakis THE EASTERN QUESTION: THE LAST PHASE A STUDY IN GREEK-TURKISH DIPLOMACY The Eastern Question: The Last Phase A STUDY IN GREEK-TURKISH DIPLOMACY Harry J. Psomiades Queens College and the Graduate School The City University of New York With an Introduction by Van Coufoudakis PELLA PELLA PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC. New York, NY 10018-6401 This book was published for The Center for Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, Queens College of the City University of New York, which bears full editorial responsibility for its contents. MODERN GREEK RESEARCH SERIES, IX, SEPTEMBER 2000 THE EASTERN QUESTION: THE LAST PHASE Second Edition © Copyright 2000 The Center for Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, Queens College of the City University of New York Flushing, NY 11367-0904 All rights reserved Library of Congress Control Number 00-134738 ISBN 0-918618-79-7 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY ATHENS PRINTING COMPANY 337 West 36th Street New York, NY 10018-6401 To Kathy and Christine Acknowledgments The Eastern Question: The Last Phase has been out of print for some years, although it has survived the test of time and continues to be widely quoted by scholars dealing with the vital decade of the twenties in Greek-Turkish relations. As a result of continued demand for the book and its usefulness for understanding the present in Greek-Turkish relations, it is being presented here in a second printing, but with a new introduction by Professor Van Coufoudakis, in the Modern Greek Research Series of the Queens College Center for Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming the Evil Passions: Moderation in the International Relations
    CHAPTER 5 Taming the Evil Passions: Moderation in the International Relations Beatrice de Graaf The concept of ‘moderation’ as introduced by Craiutu should not only be applied to domestic political history, but could equally be made fruit- ful in the context of international relations.1 In fact, since the onset of the nineteenth century, the term ‘moderation’ was oftentimes used in conjunction with ‘balance’ and ‘balance of power’. ‘Balance of power’ was an old notion, but in 1814–1815 it was a newly invigorated ideo- logical and political principle, a creed even, subscribed to by diplo- mats, monarchs and commanders alike, and projected onto the new post-Napoleonic European order. In this article, we will fesh out how the ideas of moderation and balance of power, as conceptualized in the The author wishes to express thanks to Yannick Balk, Ido de Haan, Annelotte Janse and Matthijs Lok for their critical comments and help. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement n.615313. B. de Graaf (*) Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2019 89 I. de Haan and M. Lok (eds.), The Politics of Moderation in Modern European History, Palgrave Studies in Political History, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27415-3_5 90 B. DE GRAAF early nineteenth century, became intertwined and together proved to be a viable conceptual underpinning for the colonial and imperialist order of international relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial Conference of the Modern Greek Studies Association of Australia and New Zealand, La Trobe University, 11-13 December 2008
    1 Modern Greece: an old/new nation Roderick Beaton Keynote paper given at the 9th Biennial Conference of the Modern Greek Studies Association of Australia and New Zealand, La Trobe University, 11-13 December 2008 The title of this talk points to a paradox. Greece is a very old nation, perhaps the oldest in Europe and one of the oldest surviving in the world today. But no: Greece is a new nation, created in the early 19th century. Both these statements can’t be true. And yet who would deny the antiquity of Greece? The name still, today, refers primarily to one of the great ancient civilisations of the world; indeed this is why we often have to distinguish the modern language, and the modern field of studies that brings us together here, by the addition of the word ‘Modern’. We don’t have to talk about ‘Modern British’ studies, ‘Modern French’, still less ‘Modern Australian’! But in the case of Greece we often have to make that distinction, precisely because in the minds of many people and in a wide variety of contexts, the very word ‘Greek’ implies in itself the idea of ‘ancient’. We can deplore this practice if we wish. But the fact remains: ‘Greece’ is very old as well as, in its modern form, distinctly new. The way out of the paradox must surely be to ask: what do you mean by a ‘nation’? That is the question that I intend to address in this talk. In particular, how does the success-story of Greece as a modern nation map onto current and developing theories of nations and nationalism? What does the unique and specific story of modern Greece have to tell comparatists, theorists, and historians of nationalism as a social and political phenomenon? And how, conversely, can the current theoretical debate help us better to understand the specific case of Greece, both in its particularity and in its wider political and sociological context? Two books published in 2008 tackle these issues head on.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress of Vienna and the Conservative Order of Europe
    The Congress of Vienna and the Conservative Order of Europe The Congress of Vienna After Napoleon had finally been defeated in 1815, the European monarchs breathed a huge sigh of relief. After all, the French Revolution and the development it had triggered had dominated European politics for more than a quarter of a century. Napoleon had not always been a passionate advocate of the French Revolution, yet his con- quest and occupation of Europe had contributed substantially to the spread of its ideas – liberty, equality, and fra- 5 ternity – all over the continent. Having defeated Napoleon, the monarchs of Europe were eager to ensure the restoration of peace and order. They were particularly anxious about the legacy of the ideas of the revolution, and therefore the governments of Europe were determined to follow policies that provided stability and squelch any kind of political turmoil. The Congress of Vienna, a conference of diplomats from all over Europe, tried to settle political and territ- 10 orial questions that had arisen from the Napoleonic Wars. The Congress began in 1814 when Napoleon was still exiled on Elba. In the beginning, delegates could not agree on any solutions which helped Napoleon re-establish his rule in France after his return from exile. However, after Napoleon’s final defeat at Waterloo in 1815, the Congress of Vienna took up its work again. The countries that had made the most vital contributions to defeat Napoleon were Russia, Great Britain, 15 Prussia, and Austria. Their representatives at the Congress were Tsar Alexander I of Russia, Lord Castlereagh – foreign secretary of Great Britain – King Frederick William III of Prussia, and Prince Klemens von Metternich* – chief minister of Austria and chairman of the conference.
    [Show full text]
  • 251 Chapter IX Revolution And
    251 Chapter IX Revolution and Law (1789 – 1856) The Collapse of the European States System The French Revolution of 1789 did not initialise the process leading to the collapse of the European states system but accelerated it. In the course of the revolution, demands became articulate that the ruled were not to be classed as subjects to rulers but ought to be recognised as citizens of states and members of nations and that, more fundamentally, the continuity of states was not a value in its own right but ought to be measured in terms of their usefulness for the making and the welfare of nations. The transformations of groups of subjects into nations of citizens took off in the political theory of the 1760s. Whereas Justus Lipsius and Thomas Hobbes1 had described the “state of nature” as a condition of human existence that might occur close to or even within their present time, during the later eighteenth century, theorists of politics and international relations started to position that condition further back in the past, thereby assuming that a long period of time had elapsed between the end of the “state of nature” and the making of states and societies, at least in some parts of the world. Moreover, these theorists regularly fused the theory of the hypothetical contract for the establishment of government, which had been assumed since the fourteenth century, with the theory of the social contract, which had only rarely been postulated before.2 In the view of later eighteenth-century theorists, the combination of both types of contract was to establish the nation as a society of citizens.3 Supporters of this novel theory of the combined government and social contract not merely considered human beings as capable of moving out from the “state of nature” into states, but also gave to humans the discretional mandate to first form their own nations as what came to be termed “civil societies”, before states could come into existence.4 Within states perceived in accordance with these theoretical suppositions, nationals remained bearers of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, Russo-British Diplomacy and Foreign Policy in Anna Ivanovna's
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2015 RELIGION, RUSSO-BRITISH DIPLOMACY AND FOREIGN POLICY IN ANNA IVANOVNA’S RUSSIA (1730-1740) Kyeann Sayer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, European History Commons, History of Religion Commons, Islamic World and Near East History Commons, and the Public History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Sayer, Kyeann, "RELIGION, RUSSO-BRITISH DIPLOMACY AND FOREIGN POLICY IN ANNA IVANOVNA’S RUSSIA (1730-1740)" (2015). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4535. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4535 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RELIGION, RUSSO-BRITISH DIPLOMACY AND FOREIGN POLICY IN ANNA IVANOVNA’S RUSSIA (1730-1740) By Kyeann Sayer M.A, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, 2008 BA, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 2013 BA, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 1999 Masters Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History The University of Montana Missoula, MT August 2015 Approved
    [Show full text]