DOCSLIB.ORG

CENDANT CORPORATION the Merger of CUC and HFS Was Finalized in December 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CENDANT CORPORATION the Merger of CUC and HFS Was Finalized in December 1997 THE NEW COMPANY: CENDANT CORPORATION The merger of CUC and HFS was finalized in December 1997. Henry Silverman was named CEO, and Walter Forbes was named chairman of the board. The positions of the two officers were scheduled to switch on January 1, 2000, with Henry Silverman assuming the role of chairman of the board and Walter Forbes assuming the role of CEO. The merger created a service company headquartered in Parsippany, New Jersey, with operations in more than 100 countries involving over 30,000 employees. The market value of Cendant's approximately 900 million shares of outstanding common stock at the time of the merger was estimated to be $29 billion, making it one of the 100 largest U.S. corporations. Cendant, a global service provider, was positioned to provide superior growth and value opportunities for its owners. As Henry Silverman noted when the merger was finalized: Cendant arrives at the global marketplace as the world's premier consumer and business services company, with strong growth prospects. (Form 8-K, CUC International, Inc., December 18, 1997) Initially, Ernst & Young, LLP, CUC's auditor, was retained to complete the audit of CUC's 1997 financial statements, and Deloitte & Touche, LLP, HFS's auditor, was retained to complete the audit of HFS's 1997 financial statements. Deloitte and Touche was slated to be the successor auditor for the newly formed company. Cendant's 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission announcing the selection of Deloitte & Touche as the successor auditor noted that during the past two years there were no material disagreements between the company and Ernst & Young on accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures, auditing scope, or procedures. Management organized Cendant's operations around three business segments: travel services, real estate services, and alliance marketing. The travel services segment facilitates vacation timeshare exchanges, manages corporate and government vehicle fleets, and franchises car rental and hotel businesses. Franchise systems operated by Cendant in this business segment include: Days Inn, Ramada, Howard Johnson, Super 8, Travelodge, Villager Lodge, Knights Inn, Wingate Inn, Avis, and Resort Condominiums International, LLC. The real estate services segment assists in employee relocation, provides home buyers with mortgages, and franchises real estate brokerage offices. Franchise systems operated by Cendant in this business segment include Century 21, Coldwell Banker, and ERA. The origination, sale, and service of residential mortgage loans is handled by the company through Cendant Mortgage Corporation. The alliance marketing segment provides an array of value-driven products and services through more than 20 membership clubs and client relationships. Cendant's alliance marketing activities are conducted through subsidiaries such as FISI Madison Financial Corporation, Benefits Consultants, Inc., and Entertainment Publications, Inc. Individual membership programs include Shoppers Advantage, Travelers Advantage, Auto Advantage, Credit Card Guardian, and PrivacyGuard. As a franchisor of hotels, residential real estate, brokerage offices, and car rental operations, Cendant licenses the owners and operators of independent businesses to use the Company's brand names. Cendant does not own or operate these businesses. Rather, the company provides its franchisee customers with services designed to increase their revenue and profitability. ANNOUNCEMENT OF FRAUD The high expectations of management and investors were severely deflated in April 1998, when Cendant announced a massive financial reporting fraud misstating CUC's 1997 financial statements, which were issued prior to the merger with HFS. The fraud was discovered when responsibility for Cendant's accounting functions was transferred from former CUC personnel to former HFS personnel. Initial estimates provided by senior management of Cendant were that CUC's 1997 earnings would need to be reduced by approximately $100 million to $115 million. To minimize the fallout from the fraud, Cendant quickly hired special legal counsel who in turn hired Arthur Andersen, LLP to perform an independent investigation. Cendant then fired Cosmo Corigliano, former chief financial officer (CFO) of CUC, and dismissed Ernst & Young, LLP which was serving as the auditor for Cendant's CUC business units. The staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey also initiated investigations relating to the accounting fraud. Unfortunately, the bad news did not stop for Cendant. In July 1998, Cendant announced that the fraud was more widespread than initially believed, with the accounting records of all major CUC business units affected. Cendant revised its earlier announcement by noting that CUC's 1997, 1996, and 1995 financial statements would all be restated. The total cumulative overstatement of pretax quarterly earnings over the three-year period totalled approximately $300 million. CUC's management allegedly inflated earnings by recording fictitious revenues and reducing expenses to meet Wall Street analysts' earnings expectations. CUC managers simply looked at the analysts' earnings estimates and fictitiously increased revenues and/or reduced expenses to meet those expectations. Meeting analysts' expectations artificially inflated CUC's stock prices, thereby providing it with more opportunities to merge or acquire other companies in the future through stock issuances. The inflated pretax quarterly operating earnings grew from $31 million in 1995 to $87 million in 1996 to $176 million in 1997. The misstatements reflected in CUC's quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission were not recorded in the general ledger. However, for year-end reporting purposes, CUC made various year-end adjustments to incorporate the misstatements into the general ledger. Some of the most significant misstatement techniques used by CUC to adjust its general ledger included the following: Irregular charges against merger reserves. In its earlier acquisitions of other companies, CUC would record a one-time expense and establish a reserve (liability) for restructuring costs expected to be incurred as a result of the merger. CUC would later artificially inflate earnings by fictitiously recording revenues or reducing expenses and reducing the merger reserve (liability) account. The reserve was used as a cushion to offset poor future performance. False coding of services sold to customers. CUC would falsely classify amounts received from customers for deferred revenue recognition programs as amounts received from customers for immediate revenue recognition programs. For example, CUC would improperly record amounts received for the Shoppers Advantage program (which required revenues to be recognized over 12 to 15 months) to amounts received from the Creditline program (which allowed revenues to be recognized immediately). This misclassification of purchased benefits allowed CUC to immediately recognize revenues and profits instead of deferring them over the benefit period. Delayed recognition of membership cancellations and bank rejection of charges made to members' credit card accounts. Customers were assessed an annual fee to be a member of the benefit programs, such as Auto Advantage. CUC would delay recognizing customer cancellations of benefit programs and bank rejection of credit card charges to inflate revenues and profits during the current reporting period. The final results of the fraud investigation were announced to the public in August 1998. In the end, pretax operating earnings were reduced by $245 million, $159 million, and $96 million for 1997, 1996, and 1995, respectively. All told, more than one-third of CUC's reported earnings during the fraud period were deliberately and fictitiously manufactured. MARKET REACTION TO THE FRAUD Prior to the announcement of the fraud, Cendant's stock was trading at a 52-week high of approximately $42 per share. After the second announcement that the fraud was more widespread than initially believed, Cendant's stock dropped to a 52-week low of approximately $16 per share, a 62 percent drop, causing a total market value decline of more than $20 billion. The resulting drop in Cendant's stock price squelched the company's planned $3.1 billion cash and stock acquisition of American Bankers Insurance. Additionally, numerous class action lawsuits were filed against the company and the current and former company officers and directors. On March 17, 1999, Cendant reached a final agreement on one class action lawsuit that resulted in a $351 million pre-tax charge to the 1999 financial statements. ASSIGNING BLAME Many questions remain in the aftermath of the CUC fraud. How could CUC's senior management and the board of directors not be aware of the fraud? Where was CUC's audit committee? How could Ernst & Young, LLP not detect the fraud? Walter Forbes, chairman and CEO of CUC, and Kirk Shelton, Chief Operating Officer (COO) of CUC, denied any involvement or knowledge of the alleged fraud. Cendant's audit committee, which oversaw the fraud investigation, concluded that Walter Forbes and Kirk Shelton because of their positions, had responsibility to create an environment in which it was clear to all employees at all levels that inaccurate financial reporting would not be tolerated. The fact that there is evidence that many of the senior accounting and financial personnel participated in irregular activities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [115] 2017-07-31 Fourth Amended Complaint.PDF
    Case 8:15-cv-01973-FMO-AFM Document 115 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 43 Page ID #:3748 1 ALAN A. GREENBERG, State Bar No. 150827 [email protected] 2 WAYNE R. GROSS, State Bar No. 138828 [email protected] 3 EVAN C. BORGES, State Bar No. 128706 [email protected] 4 GREENBERG GROSS LLP 5 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1750 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 6 Telephone: (949) 383-2800 Facsimile: (949) 383-2801 7 DANIEL S. ROBINSON, State Bar No. 244245 8 [email protected] WESLEY K. POLISCHUK, State Bar No. 254121 9 [email protected] ROBINSON CALCAGNIE, INC. 10 19 Corporate Plaza Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 11 Telephone: (949) 720-1288 12 Facsimile: (949) 720-1292 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sheri Dodge, Neil Dodge, Ram Agrawal, Sarita Agrawal and All Others 14 Similarly Situated 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SHERI DODGE and NEIL DODGE, and Case No. 8:15-CV-01973 RAM AGRAWAL and SARITA 18 AGRAWAL, individually and on behalf of all FOURTH AMENDED CLASS others similarly situated, ACTION COMPLAINT FOR 19 VIOLATIONS OF § 8(a) OF Plaintiffs, THE REAL ESTATE 20 SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES 21 v. ACT, 12 U.S.C. § 2607(a) 22 PHH CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 23 REALOGY HOLDINGS CORP., a Delaware corporation; 24 PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation; 25 PHH HOME LOANS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; 26 RMR FINANCIAL, LLC, a California limited 27 liability company; NE MOVES MORTGAGE LLC, a 28 Massachusetts limited liability company; FOURTH AMENDED CLASS
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity in the 2000S 1 Private Equity in the 2000S
    Private equity in the 2000s 1 Private equity in the 2000s Private equity in the 2000s relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub-industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although interrelated tracks. The development of the private equity and venture capital asset classes has occurred through a series of boom and bust cycles since the middle of the 20th century. As the 20th century ended, so, too, did the dot-com bubble and the tremendous growth in venture capital that had marked the previous five years. In the wake of the collapse of the dot-com bubble, a new "Golden Age" of private equity ensued, as leveraged buyouts reach unparalleled size and the private equity firms achieved new levels of scale and institutionalization, exemplified by the initial public offering of the Blackstone Group in 2007. Bursting the Internet Bubble and the private equity crash (2000–2003) The Nasdaq crash and technology slump that started in March 2000 shook virtually the entire venture capital industry as valuations for startup technology companies collapsed. Over the next two years, many venture firms had been forced to write-off large proportions of their investments and many funds were significantly "under water" (the values of the fund's investments were below the amount of capital invested). Venture capital investors sought to reduce size of commitments they had made to venture capital funds and in numerous instances, investors sought to unload existing commitments for cents on the dollar in the secondary market.
    [Show full text]
  • Cendant Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): August 24, 2006 (August 23, 2006) Cendant Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Delaware 1-10308 06-0918165 (State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of Incorporation) Identification No.) 9 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (212) 413-1800 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) None (Former name or former address if changed since last report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets. On August 23, 2006, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) completed the sale of the business of Travelport Inc., Cendant’s travel distribution services subsidiary (“Travelport”), pursuant to a definitive agreement, dated June 30, 2006 (as amended), by and among Cendant Corporation, Travelport and TDS Investor Corporation (formerly known as TDS Investor LLC), an affiliate of The Blackstone Group (the “purchaser”), for $4.3 billion in cash subject to closing adjustments.
    [Show full text]
  • Super-8-Partial-FDD
    FRANCHISE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT Super 8 Worldwide, Inc. A South Dakota corporation 22 Sylvan Way Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 (973)753-8300 www.super8.com The franchisee will operate a Super 8 guest lodging facility franchise offering overnight accommodations and related services. The total investment necessary to begin operation of a Super 8 franchise for a 60 room new construction facility ranges from $2.851.5702.819.970 to $3.962.6003.816.500. The total investment necessary to begin operation of a Super 8 franchise for a 60 room conversion facility ranges from $176,170 to $1.591.0001.125.600. The above amounts include from $31,900 to $32,900 that must be paid to the franchisor or an affiliate. This Disclosure Document summarizes certain provisions of your franchise agreement and other information in plain English. Read this Disclosure Document and all accompanying agreements carefully. You must receive this Disclosure Document at least 14 calendar-days before you sign a binding agreement with, or make any payment to, the franchisor or an affiliate in connection with the proposed franchise sale. Note, however, that no governmental agency has verified the information contained in this document. You may wish to receive your Disclosure Document in another format that is more convenient for you. To discuss the availability of disclosures in different formats, contact Franchise Development Department, Super 8 Worldwide, Inc., 22 Sylvan Way, Parsippany, NJ 07054 or call (800) 758-8999. The terms of your contract will govern your franchise relationship. Do not rely on the Disclosure Document alone to understand your contract.
    [Show full text]
  • FORBES GREATEST INVESTING STORIES First Time Nor the Last
    Forbes ® Greatest Investing Stories Forbes ® Greatest Investing Stories Richard Phalon John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York • Chichester • Weinheim • Brisbane • Singapore • Toronto Copyright © 2001 by Forbes Inc. All rights reserved. Forbes is a registered trademark of Forbes Inc. Its use is pursuant to a license agreement with Forbes Inc. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permis- sion of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per- copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4744. Requests to the Publisher for permis- sion should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158-0012, (212) 850-6011, fax (212) 850-6008, E-Mail: [email protected]. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional per- son should be sought. PICTURE CREDITS: Page xiv: ©Bettman/Corbis; Page 26: Courtesy Third Avenue Funds, New York, NY; Page 50: T. Rowe Price, Baltimore, MD; Page 74: Courtesy Janus, Denver, CO; Page 96: ©Bettman/Corbis; Page 126: ©John Abbott; Page 148: Brown Brothers, Sterling, PA; Page 174: Courtesy Muriel Siebert & Co., Inc.; Page 190: Courtesy Baker Library, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA; Page 206: ©Jim Bush This title is also available in print as ISBN 0-471-35624-7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eclipse of Private Equity
    THE ECLIPSE OF PRIVATE EQUITY BY BRIAN CHEFFINS* AND JOHN ARMOUR" ABSTRACT Private equity, characterized by firms operating as privately held partnerships organizing the acquisition and "taking private" of public companies, has recently dominated the business news due to deals unprecedentedin number and size. If this buyout boom continues unabated, the 1989 prediction by economist Michael Jensen of The Eclipse of the Public Corporation could be proved accurate. This article argues matters will work out much differently, with the current version of private equity being eclipsed. One possibility is that a set of market and legal conditions highly congenial to "public-to-private"transactions could be disrupted. A "credit crunch" commencing in the summer of 2007 stands out as the most immediate threat. The articledraws on history to put matters into context, discussing how the spectacular rise of conglomerates in the 1960s was reversed in subsequent decades and how the 1980s buyout boom led by leveraged buyout associations-the private equity firms of the day- collapsed. If legal and market conditions remainfavorableforprivateequity, its eclipse is likely to occur in a different way. Privacy has been a hallmarkof private equity, with industry leaders operatingas secretivepartnerships that negotiate buyouts behind closed doors and restructureportfolio companies outside the public gaze. However, the private equity boom created momentum among market leaders to carry outpublic offerings and diversify their operations. If this trend proves sustainable, then even if the taking private of publicly quoted companies remains a mainstream pursuit, the exercise will be carriedout in the main by broadly basedfinancial groups under the umbrella of public markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriott International – Affiliate Operating Agreement
    Marriott International – Affiliate Operating Agreement This Agreement supplements the Terms and Conditions entered into between you and Performance Horizon Group LIMITED (“PHG”) as they apply to your application and participation as an Affiliate in the Affiliate Program of Marriott International, Inc. (“Marriott”) and Marriott.com (together with any other Marriott-owned websites) (collectively, the "Program"). As used in this Agreement, "we", “us”, “our” or "Marriott” means Marriott International, on behalf of itself and its affiliated companies and brands, and "you" means the applicant party. The “Sites” means Marriott’s Web sites as related to the respective Campaign including, but not limited to, the Marriott Sites (www.Marriott.com, www.Marriott.co.uk, etc.), and any other Marriott-owned Web sites, whether existing as of the date you began to participate in Marriott’s Affiliate program or in the future, created by Marriott to sell related services or merchandise as defined and outlined in Section 7. All capitalized terms that are not specifically defined in this Agreement shall have the same meaning as defined in the PHG Terms and Conditions. If there are any conflicts between this Agreement and the PHG Terms and Conditions, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. By submitting the Application, you hereby ACCEPT AND AGREE to all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement as they may be revised or amended by Marriott from time to time. This Agreement will become binding when your Application is accepted by Marriott. 1. Program Terms and Conditions. Your participation in the Program shall be governed by Marriott’s Campaign Details listed in the PHG console, and the terms and conditions of this Agreement (collectively, the “Program Terms”).
    [Show full text]
  • Cendant Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): August 4, 2006 (July 31, 2006) Cendant Corporation (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Delaware 1-10308 06-0918165 (State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of Incorporation) Identification No.) 9 West 57th Street New York, NY 10019 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (212) 413-1800 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) None (Former name or former address if changed since last report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. Effective as of the close of business on July 31, 2006, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) completed the separation of Realogy Corporation (“Realogy”) and Wyndham Worldwide Corporation (“Wyndham”), formerly wholly owned subsidiaries of Cendant that hold directly or indirectly the assets and liabilities associated with Cendant’s Real Estate Services businesses and the assets and liabilities associated with Cendant’s Hospitality Services (including Timeshare Resorts) businesses, respectively, by distributing all of the shares of common stock of Realogy and Wyndham to Cendant stockholders in a tax- free stock dividend (each a “Distribution” and collectively, the “Distributions”).
    [Show full text]
  • Articles Packet
    BRN 482 Professor Clifford W. Smith Jr. Corporate Financial Policy Summer 2007 ARTICLES PACKET Debt-Driven Deals Shake Up Holders of Highly Rated Bonds Karen Richardson and Serena Ng. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Feb 8, 2007. Abstract (Document Summary) On Dec. 26, before Vornado appeared on the scene, EOP and Blackstone announced plans to buy back all of EOP's $8.4 billion in bonds as part of the Blackstone buyout. The offer covered short-term bonds due within the next 10 years and longer-term bonds due as late as 2031. But debt investors rallied against it, rejecting the terms as too little for the long-term bondholders. "It was an impressive effort, especially the way bondholders seemingly looked out for each other," says Sid Bakst, a bond manager at Robeco Weiss, Peck & Greer who wasn't involved in the EOP affair. "It's one of the first things we ask for nowadays," says Mr. Bakst of Robeco Weiss. "It's an insurance policy that protects against the worst-case scenario." If companies choose not to include covenants, they may have to commit to higher interest rates before investors will buy their bonds. Full Text (1002 words) (c) 2005 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission. The flurry of debt-driven corporate mergers, spinoffs and buyouts is putting a normally staid group of investors -- investment-grade bondholders -- on the defensive. Typically a genteel bunch populated by life insurers and pension- fund managers, these risk-averse investors are learning the hard way that their bets on high-quality corporate bonds, some of the safest debt around, are more vulnerable than believed.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriott International, Inc
    MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2002 ANNUAL REPORT At Marriott resorts worldwide, relaxation is an active pursuit, found among refreshing pools, world-class spas and championship golf. VISION: To be the world’s leading provider of hospitality services. Since its founding in 1927, our company has been built on a foundation of hard work, integrity, service and the pursuit of excellence.The knowledge and experience we’ve gained over the years has served us well as we’ve grown from a root beer stand to a global lodging company.Today, Marriott International is an acknowledged leader in the hospitality industry.We offer the most comprehensive lodging portfolio in the world, with nearly 2,600 properties across 18 hotel, vacation ownership and corporate housing brands. Along the way, we’ve built a highly regarded but never duplicated culture that emphasizes the importance of people and recognizes the value they bring to our organization. Every day, approximately 144,000 associates serve guests in 67 countries and territories. It is their attention to detail, commitment to quality, and passion for delivering world-class service that keeps guests coming back to Marriott. CONTENTS 27 NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 47 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA 1 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 48 SELECTED HISTORICAL 2 BRAND OVERVIEW FINANCIAL DATA 6 EXECUTIVE LETTER 49 MANAGEMENT’S REPORT 10 MARRIOTT’S HERITAGE 49 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT OF SERVICE AUDITORS 11 FINANCIAL REVIEW 50 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 23 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 51 CORPORATE INFORMATION Cover: Inspired by the splendor of the Grand Canyon, the alluring JW Marriott Desert Ridge Resort & Spa in Phoenix boasts a serene setting accented by majestic palm-lined paths and star-studded evenings.
    [Show full text]
  • Choice Privileges Visa Card from Choice Hotels Offers the Largest Payback Among Leading Budget Hotel Companies
    Issued: July 25, 2007 Contact: Jay Sorensen, 414-961-1939 IdeaWorksCompany.com Choice Privileges Visa Card from Choice Hotels Offers the Largest Payback Among Leading Budget Hotel Companies TripRewards MasterCard offers a good alternative with more hotel locations and no advance reservation restriction for hotel reward nights. Frequent flier program members have learned co-branded credit cards offer a reliable path to faster mileage accumulation. The big three airlines all offer substantial mileage bonuses and first year fee waivers for their co-branded credit cards. For many consumers, these cards generate more frequent flier miles than the actual purchase of airline tickets. This credit card mania has now invaded the lodging sector and its frequent guest programs. This report reviews the co-branded credit cards associated with the three largest budget chains as listed in a ranking of top hotel companies.1 The analysis emphasizes the reward payback provided by charge activity and does not evaluate the benefits provided by each program for hotel point accrual. The following tables list the budget brands, frequent guest program, and co-branded credit card associated with the three largest budget hotel companies: Best Western International Budget Brands Best Western and Best Western Premier Loyalty Program Gold Crown Club International C0-Branded Card Best Western MasterCard Choice Hotels International Cambria Suites, Clarion, Comfort Inn, Comfort Suites, Budget Brands MainStay Suites, Quality Inn, Sleep Inn, and Suburban Extended Stay Hotel. Loyalty Program Choice Privileges C0-Branded Card Choice Privileges Visa Best Budget Hotel Credit Cards Page 2 Wyndham Worldwide (formerly Cendant Hotel Group) AmeriHost Inn, Baymont Inn & Suites, Days Inn, Howard Budget Brands Johnson, Knights Inn, Ramada Worldwide, Super 8 Motel, Travelodge, and Wingate Inn by Wyndham.
    [Show full text]
  • Cendant Corporation Cendant Corporation Cendant Corporation Cendant Corporation
    CENDANT CORPORATION CENDANT CORPORATION CENDANT CORPORATION CENDANT CORPORATION - Compañía norteamericana que cotiza en la Bolsa de Nueva York DIVISIÓN DE VIAJES Y ALQUILER DE VEHÍCULOS: - Procede de una gigantesca fusión en octubre de 1997 de CUC Internacional (compañía dedicada al marketing directo a gran escala) y Blackstone Group (concesionaria de franquicias de hostelería: Blackstone administra a 50 sociedades que emplean a 375.000 personas para un volumen de negocios total de 85 mil millones $). - Sus distintas marcas de hoteles, funcionan desde 1925 - Tiene 3 divisiones de negocios: - El negocio de agencias de viajes y hostelería (Travel Services) - El negocio inmobiliario - El negocio de alquiler de vehículos - Sus beneficios DI se sitúan entorno al 27% - Su rentabilidad Activo (ROI=BenefAImp.Int/ActTotal) es del 206% -Oficina central con sede en New Jersey (Estados Unidos) CENDANT CORPORATION CENDANT CORPORATION CENDANT CORPORATION HISTORIA DE LA COMPAÑÍA: DIVISIÓN DE NEGOCIOS INMOBILIARIOS: MARCAS DE LA DIVISIÓN HOTELERA (9 MARCAS): - En 1990 Henry Silverman es seleccionado para encargarse de las Henry Silverman (Presidente - 1) FRANQUICIAS INMOBILIARIAS: Cendant es la franquiciadora - Opera con 9 marcas en dos de los cuatro segmentos del Mdo: inversiones de “buy-outs” de la compañía Blackstone Group, y se le y Director General) inmobiliaria más importante del mundo, con más de 13.000 inmob entre segmento económico y medio del mercado, no teniendo hace cargo de un capital de 850 millones de $ las marcas Century 21 (vende una casa cada minuto), ERA y Codwell También es el fundador y representación en el segmento alto y de gran lujo. (Cendant estima - Henry Silverman lo invierte todo en el sector hotelero y más primer accionista de la - 2) SERVICIOS DE RECOLOCACIÓN: reubica cada año más de 150.000 que más del 75% de la demanda en USA, busca una oferta < 100 $) concretamente en el negocio de las franquicias.
    [Show full text]