DOCSLIB.ORG

Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Plan 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Plan 2017 Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Plan 2017 www.piercecountywa.org/swm Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Plan April 2017 This document was prepared by the Surface Water Management Division of Pierce County Planning and Public Works Department (SWM). SWM manages and maintains the Naches Trail Preserve. For additional information, please call (253) 798-2725 or email SWM at [email protected] Acknowledgements Many have contributed to the protection and preservation of this community resource. Establishment of the Naches Trail Preserve (Preserve) would not have been possible without the efforts of the Clover Creek Council and Forterra. Many community members also donated their time for research, documentation of resources, and restoration activities. Special Acknowledgement Special thanks go to the citizen members of the Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Committee, who attended many meetings, participated in management activities on the Preserve, and were instrumental in the completion of the first Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Plan in 2006. They participated from the beginning to preserve this property. Mary Sue Gee Ione Clagett Tammy Clark In Memorium David Renstrom at Pierce County Public Works was instrumental in the creation of the Preserve and the development and implementation of the 2006 Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Plan. Dave was an enthusiastic naturalist. He is missed by many. Consultant Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., Seattle, Washington, contributed to the preparation of this plan update. TABLE OF CONTENTS NACHES TRAIL PRESERVE STEWARDSHIP PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... ES-1 Reason for 2017 Naches Trail Preserve Stewardship Plan ................................................................................... ES-1 Naches Trail Preserve Background ....................................................................................................................... ES-1 Stewardship Plan .................................................................................................................................................. ES-2 Plan Content ......................................................................................................................................................... ES-3 Public Access ........................................................................................................................................................ ES-3 Habitat Management ........................................................................................................................................... ES-3 Infrastructure ....................................................................................................................................................... ES-3 Long-Term Management ...................................................................................................................................... ES-3 Priority Strategies ................................................................................................................................................. ES-4 Chapter One - Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.0 Plan Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Naches Trail Preserve Background ................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.1 Property Acquisition .................................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.2 2006 Plan ................................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.3 Conservation Values .................................................................................................................................. 1-4 1.1.4 Conservation Easement ............................................................................................................................ 1-5 1.2 Plan Development ............................................................................................................................................ 1-7 1.3 Management Goals .......................................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4 Content & Organization of Stewardship Plan................................................................................................... 1-7 Chapter Two – Cultural Resources, Land Use and Climate Change ................................................................... 2-1 2.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.2 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.1 Cross Park .................................................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.3 Growth and Development ................................................................................................................................ 2-5 2.4 Climate Change ................................................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.5 Encumbrances .................................................................................................................................................. 2-9 Chapter Three – Existing Conditions – Natural Features, Fish & Wildlife & Infrastructure ................................. 3-1 3.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 General Property Description ........................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Clover Creek ..................................................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 Channel Morphology ................................................................................................................................. 3-4 Pierce County 1 www.piercecountywa.org/water TABLE OF CONTENTS NACHES TRAIL PRESERVE STEWARDSHIP PLAN 3.2.2 Riparian Habitat ......................................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.3 Instream Habitat........................................................................................................................................ 3-4 3.2.4 Groundwater Influence ............................................................................................................................. 3-7 3.2.5 Water Quality ............................................................................................................................................ 3-7 3.3 Wetlands .......................................................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.3.1 Wetland Characteristics ............................................................................................................................ 3-8 3.3.2 Wetland Ratings ........................................................................................................................................ 3-9 3.4 Fish & Wildlife ................................................................................................................................................ 3-12 3.4.1 Priority Habitats and Species ................................................................................................................... 3-12 3.4.2 Aquatic Species ........................................................................................................................................ 3-14 3.4.3 Species Presence During Site Visits ......................................................................................................... 3-16 3.5 Geology & Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 3-16 3.6 Mima Mounds ............................................................................................................................................... 3-19 3.7 Prairie Grassland ............................................................................................................................................ 3-21 3.8 Oregon White Oak Woodlands ...................................................................................................................... 3-23 3.9 Mixed Conifer/Deciduous Forest .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES Fall, 1984 2 The Wild Cascades PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE ONCE THE LINES ARE DRAWN, THE BATTLE IS NOT OVER The North Cascades Conservation Council has developed a reputation for consistent, hard-hitting, responsible action to protect wildland resources in the Washington Cascades. It is perhaps best known for leading the fight to preserve and protect the North Cascades in the North Cascades National Park, the Pasayten and Glacier Peak Wilderness Areas, and the Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas. Despite the recent passage of the Washington Wilderness Act, many areas which deserve and require wilderness designation remain unprotected. One of the goals of the N3C must be to assure protection for these areas. In this issue of the Wild Cascades we have analyzed the Washington Wilderness Act to see what we won and what still hangs in the balance (page ). The N3C will continue to fight to establish new wilderness areas, but there is also a new challenge. Our expertise is increasingly being sought by government agencies to assist in developing appropriate management plans and to support them against attempts to undermine such plans. The invitation to participate more fully in management activities will require considerable effort, but it represents a challenge and an opportunity that cannot be ignored. If we are to meet this challenge we will need members who are either knowledgable or willing to learn about an issue and to guide the Board in its actions. The Spring issue of the Wild Cascades carried a center section with two requests: 1) volunteers to assist and guide the organization on various issues; and 2) payment of dues.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Road History Tsurveyed, Nor Graded, Nor Overland
    he fi rst highways in the area now County–the Duwamish, Muckleshoot, Puyallup, Chapter II. known as King County were neither Skykomish, Snoqualmie, Suquamish, and Synopsis of Road History Tsurveyed, nor graded, nor overland. Tulalip peoples–developed thriving cultures They were the lakes, rivers and streams that with broad economic ties. Their relationships laced the landscape and provided the area’s with the land, and the social connections fi rst people with nourishment and a ready they cultivated with neighboring coastal means of transportation across the region’s varied and eastern interior tribes, necessitated topography. Therefore the county’s earliest a sophisticated transportation system. Puget overland trails closely followed or connected Sound, fresh water lakes and rivers offered these major bodies of water. These trails a ready means of transport; and the canoe, would eventually become the foundation for designed for light travel, made it possible the modern network of roads in use today. to penetrate far inland. Travel between settlements, as well as to and from resource Public road building in King County began areas, did necessitate some overland travel. shortly after its establishment in 1852. The In these instances, trails provided the shorter– earliest road law governing roads and the if more challenging–route. building of bridges was enacted in 1854 at the fi rst meeting of the Washington Territorial The most traveled footpaths through the Legislature. Over the next half-century, mountains crossed over the passes of lowest however, very little was expended on road elevation. Trails leading into King County development and maintenance due to the from the east over Naches, Snoqualmie and dominance of the railroads and the county’s Yakima Passes all followed the Yakima River continued dependency on water transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • MARKING HISTORIC .SITES* on the 29Th Day of August, 1851, Citizens
    MARKING HISTORIC .SITES* On the 29th day of August, 1851, citizens living in the Northwest part of Oregon Territory met in convention at Cow­ litz and formulated a petition to the United States Congress ask­ ing for division of territory, and the erection of a new common­ wealth north of the Columbia river, to be known as "The Terri­ tory of Columbia." Several other things were asked for by the members of the convention: one of great importance was an ap­ propriation of $100,000 for the construction of a road across the Cascade Mountains from Puget Sound to Fort Walla Walla. Con­ gress of course could hardly do just what the people most inti­ mately concerned wanted done; but they did appropriate $20,000 for the construction of a military road from Fort Steilacoom to Fort Walla Walla via the Naches Pass, and they did enact a law creating a ·new Territory north of the ~olumbia, with much greater expanse than was asked, then too they called it Washington in­ stead of "Columbia." We of today, however, have no quarrel with Congress relative to either one of those digressions from the ori­ ginal petition. Deeming that the date and facts of the -Cowlitz Convention were of sufficient importance to be remembered, not only by the people of today, but ~lso by those of generations yet to come, the 'iVashington State Historical Society has erected, on the Pacific Highway, near the bank of the Cowlitz river, at Toledo, a granite monument, inscribed as follows: "August 29, 1851, a convention held at Cowlitz, 1 mile South, formulated a petition asking Con­ gress to divide Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • HABS No, WA-180 Tieton Ranger Station (White Pass Work Center) N
    HABS No, WA-180 Tieton Ranger Station (White Pass Work Center) N. side of State Hwy. 12, W. of State Hwy. 410 Naches Vicinity H/rBS Yakima County f/VA^J Washington ' *" ■' , PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service, Western Region Department of the Interior San Francisco, California 94102 HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDING SURVEY Ql" hJA'^K TIETON RANGER STATION (WHITE PASS WORK CENTER) HABS NO. WA-180 J I Location: North side of State Highway 12, approximately 17 miles west of the junction of State Highway 410 and 22 miles north and west of Naches, Yakima County, Washington. Buildings #1051, 1052, 1053, 1553 only. USGS Tieton Basin Quadrangle (7.5), Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: Easting 647000 and Northing 5170880. Present Owner: U.S. Government, administered by USDA Forest Service, Wenatchee National Forest, Naches Ranger District. Present Occupant: USDA Forest Service employee (#1052) Unoccupied (#1051, #1053, #1553) Present Use: Staff housing (#1052) Not currently in use (#1051, #1053, #1553) Significance: The Tieton Ranger Station includes eleven (11) buildings which are properties in a thematic group National Register of Historic Places nomination comprising Forest Service Administration structures built between 1933- 1942 under the auspices of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), on National Forest system lands in the States of Oregon and Washington. The thematic group as a whole and the four subject properties of this documentation are significant because of their direct association with the political and legislative events of the New Deal and the CCC, their association with the establishment of the USDA Forest Service and its stewardship of forest resources, and their embodiment of distinctive characteristics of the rustic style of architecture particular to the Forest Service in the Pacific Northwest Region and exclusive to the Depression Era, 1933-1942.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Overview of Vancouver Barracks, 1846-1898, with Suggestions for Further Research
    Part I, “Our Manifest Destiny Bids Fair for Fulfillment”: An Historical Overview of Vancouver Barracks, 1846-1898, with suggestions for further research Military men and women pose for a group photo at Vancouver Barracks, circa 1880s Photo courtesy of Clark County Museum written by Donna L. Sinclair Center for Columbia River History Funded by The National Park Service, Department of the Interior Final Copy, February 2004 This document is the first in a research partnership between the Center for Columbia River History (CCRH) and the National Park Service (NPS) at Fort Vancouver National Historic Site. The Park Service contracts with CCRH to encourage and support professional historical research, study, lectures and development in higher education programs related to the Fort Vancouver National Historic Site and the Vancouver National Historic Reserve (VNHR). CCRH is a consortium of the Washington State Historical Society, Portland State University, and Washington State University Vancouver. The mission of the Center for Columbia River History is to promote study of the history of the Columbia River Basin. Introduction For more than 150 years, Vancouver Barracks has been a site of strategic importance in the Pacific Northwest. Established in 1849, the post became a supply base for troops, goods, and services to the interior northwest and the western coast. Throughout the latter half of the nineteenth century soldiers from Vancouver were deployed to explore the northwest, build regional transportation and communication systems, respond to Indian-settler conflicts, and control civil and labor unrest. A thriving community developed nearby, deeply connected economically and socially with the military base. From its inception through WWII, Vancouver was a distinctly military place, an integral part of the city’s character.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from an Old Road: Frederick Dent's Route from Fort Dalles to Fort Simcoe, by Michael
    WashingtonHistory.org LESSONS FROM AN OLD ROAD Frederick Dent’s Route from Fort Dalles to Fort Simcoe By Michael McKenzie COLUMBIA The Magazine of Northwest History, Fall 2002: Vol. 16, No. 3 In my experience of three score years and ten, over half of which has been on the frontier of the Pacific Coast, it has been my fortune to encounter many hardships, and make many journeys involving hunger, fatigue, perils of travel, by snows in the mountains, by swollen streams, and days of weary travel over burning deserts, but I do not remember any journey involving more weariness of body, and anxiety of mind, than the one which, I am thankful to say, has just been successfully accomplished. —United States Indian Agent James H. Wilbur from a letter to H. Price, commissioner of Indian Affairs, written July 18, 1881, after Wilbur's return to Fort Simcoe from Malheur, Oregon. James Harvey Wilbur was lucky to be alive—and knew it. He also should have known better. Wilbur had lived some 20 years in the desert climate of the Yakima Valley and understood the importance of dependable water sources and good roads for traveling on the frontier— especially in summer. The above letter, dated July 18, 1881, describes an ill-fated trip on a horrible road from Umatilla, Oregon, to Fort Simcoe, Washington Territory, made in the blistering heat of July. The Malheur Indian Reservation in southeastern Oregon had been closed by the federal government, and Wilbur had been directed to proceed there and transfer all the government property (including a large cattle herd) back to Simcoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Puyallup Historic Survey Report Puyallup, Washington For
    Puyallup Historic Survey Report Puyallup, Washington for The City of Puyallup, Pierce County, & the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation BOLA Architecture + Planning Seattle August 2007 Historic Survey Report Puyallup, Washington August 2007 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 Background Project Goals Project Schedule and Survey Methods The Survey Area Property Selection Criteria Acknowledgements Survey Grant Sponsorship 2. Historic Context Statement 7 Natural Setting First Peoples and Early Settlement Founding of the City Early Puyallup – An Agricultural Market Town Impact of Transportation – Railroads, the Interurban, and Road and Highway Systems The 1949 and 1965 Earthquakes Population Increases and Demographics Post-War Suburban Growth and Annexations The City’s Downtown Business Community Civic and Institutional Structures 3. Analysis 28 Determinants of Physical Form and Urban Design Features Building Types, Materials, and Architectural Styles 4. Survey Results 31 Findings The Survey List 5. Recommendations 39 City of Puyallup Preservation Goals and Policies The Next Step in Preservation 6. Bibliography and Sources 44 Appendices: "Historic Resource Survey Areas" and "Inventoried Properties" Maps Cover photo from the Ezra Meeker Historical Society, Puyallup, Washington. BOLA Architecture + Planning 320 Terry Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98109 206.447.4749 PUYALLUP HISTORIC SURVEY REPORT 1. Introduction Background Puyallup is one of Washington State’s oldest cities, and it contains a significant number of historic properties that reflect its origin as an agricultural settlement dating from the 1850s. Located eight miles east of Tacoma and Commencement Bay, the town was founded on the south side of the Puyallup River in the late 1870s, and its urban environment represents nearly 140 years of development.
    [Show full text]
  • Cle Elum River
    Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Assessment Wenatchee National Forest APPENDIX E ASSESSMENT OF RNERS AS TO THEIR ELIGIBILITYAND SUITABILITY FOR DESIGNATION UNDER THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT I. INTRODUCTION The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, as amended, was enacted by Congress to provide Federal protection for selected free-flowing rivers within the United States. During the initial preparation of the Draft Envl- ronmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and The Proposed Land and Resource Management Plan for the Wenatchee National Forest, a study of certain rivers on the Forest was undertaken to determine their potential eligibility and suitability for inclusion in the Wild and Scenic River System. At that time, the study was confined, with the exception of the Entiat drainage, to those rivers listed on the Nationwide Rivers Inventory, originally published by the Department of Intenor in 1980, and updated in 1982. This inventory was developed to identify rivers which would, by virtue of then exceptional natural, cultural, scenic or recreation resources, qualify for further consideration for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic River System. The Wenatchee, White and Chiwawa Rivers, and Icicle Creek were identifed in the mventory as meeting these criteria. The mitial Forest planning effort also included the Entiat River and two tributaries, in response to public interest expressed at that time. As a result of both in-Service review and the analysis of comments received from the public during the comment period for the DEIS, the Forest Supervisor assigned an Interdisciplinary (ID) Team the task of malong a reassessment of eligibility for all rivers on the Wenatchee National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT ELSE WAS HAPPENING? (Within Five Years Before and After 1856)
    1856- WHAT ELSE WAS HAPPENING? (within five years before and after 1856) 1851- (August 29)- First Convention at Cowlitz Landing (Toledo, WA) asks Congress to divide the Oregon Territory at Columbia River, and name northern territory "Columbia." 1851- Beginning of Rogue River Indian Wars. Herman Melville publishes the novel Moby Dick. 1 851- A Customs House is built in Olympia. Daniel Bigelow arrives in Olympia. 1852- Harriet Beecher Stowe publishes Uncle Tom's Cabin . Franklin Pierce elected president. 1852- (Jan 12)- Thurston County established. (Olympia formerly part of Lewis County.) 1852- First flight of a blimp. Inventor is Henry Giffard. 1852- (Sept.11 )- First newspaper, The Columbian is printed in Olympia. 1853- The hypodermic syringe is invented. (Summer) Population of Thurston Co. is 996. 1853- (Mar 3)- President signs bill creating Washington Territory, (instead of Columbia). 1853- (Spring)- A committee including Edmund Sylvester locates "People's Road" route for immigrants over Naches Pass, as alternate to Columbia River route from Walla Walla. 1853- The Crimean War breaks out between Russia and allied forces of France, Turkey and Great Britain. Florence Nightingale gains fame for efforts as nurse during this war. 1854- (Feb)-1 st territorial legislature held at Parker & Coulter Store on Main St., Olympia. 1854- (Dec 24-26)- Medicine Creek Treaty Council held on the Nisqually Delta. 1855- YWCA is founded by Emma Robarts in London. Its purpose is to house young nurses returning from the Crimean War. 1855- (August)- A new two story schoolhouse is built in Olympia near 6th & Franklin. 1855- (Christmas)- First singing of "Hark the Herald Angels Sing." 1855- (Oct 28)- White River Massacre (near current-day Auburn, WA.).
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Guided Plant Walks
    Self-Guided Plant Walks Washington Native Plant Society Central Puget Sound Chapter Over the course of many years, the plant walks listed in this booklet provided WNPS members with interesting outings whether it be winter, spring, summer or fall. We hope these walk descriptions will encourage you to get out and explore! These walks were published on wnps.org from 1999-2011 by the Central Puget Sound Chapter and organized by month. In 2017 they were compiled into this booklet for historical use. Species names, urls, emails, directions, and trail data will not be updated. If you are interested in traveling to a site, please call the property manager (city, county, ranger station, etc.) to ensure the trail is open and passable for safe travel. To view updated species names, visit the UW Burke Herbarium Image Collection website at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php. Compiled October 28, 2017 Contents February .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Discovery Park Loop - February 2011 .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Sol Duc Falls - February 2010 ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Meadowdale County Park - February
    [Show full text]
  • KITTITAS COUNTY PROFILE JUNE 1998 Labor Market and Economic
    KITTITAS COUNTY PROFILE Acknowledgements: JUNE 1998 Phoenix Economic Development Group Labor Market and Economic Analysis Branch Ellensburg Business Development Authority Employment Security Department P.O. Box 598 Ellensburg, WA 98926-0598 This report has been prepared in accordance with (509) 962-7244 RCW 50.38.050. Fax: (509) 962-7141 E-mail: [email protected] Carver Gayton, Commissioner Washington State Employment Security Department Kittitas-Yakima Resource Conservation and Economic Development District (Ki-Yak) Gary Bodeutsch, Director Kittitas County Courthouse Labor Market and Economic Analysis Branch 205 West 5th Avenue P.O. Box 9046 Ellensburg, WA 98926 Mail Stop 6000 (509) 962-7536 Olympia, WA 98507-9046 Fax: (509) 962-7075 (360) 438-4800 E-mail: [email protected] Prepared by Jay Barrier, Economic Analyst Ellensburg Job Service Center and Rev Froyalde, Research Analyst 607 E. Mountain View Layout by Bonnie Dalebout, Editorial Assistant P.O. Box 38 Ellensburg, WA 98926 (509) 925-6166 Scott Bailey Washington State Employment Security Department Regional Labor Economist 5411 East Mill Plain, Suite B3 Vancouver, WA 98661 (360) 735-5043 Price $4.50 plus 8.0% sales tax for Washington residents TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................... 1 Manufacturing GEOGRAPHY .......................................... 2 Transportation, Communications, and ECONOMIC HISTORY .............................3 Utilities (TCU) POPULATION .......................................... 6 Trade Trends Finance, Insurance, and Real
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    NACHES PASS Far up in the Cascade Range, at an elevation of 4,988 feet, lies historic Naches Pass. From Pyramid Peak, on the north side, may be seen Mount Rainier to the southwest, rising in all its gran­ deur above the surrounding country, while off toward the southeast the canyon of the Naches River extends on to the great Yakima Val­ ley. Four counties of the state of Washington meet at the Pass­ Kittitas on the northeast, Yakima on the southeast, Pierce on the southwest, and King on the northwest. Mountain ranges are barriers to the advancement of railroads, and it is only by boring tunnels or laying tracks over the pass, if Providence has been thoughtful enough to provide them at not too high an altitude, that their routes may be extended from one side to the other. Through the Cascade Range, in this state, are twelve main passes, the lowest of which, Snoqualmie, WIth an elevation of 3,004 feet, was chosen by the Milwaukee Road; while the next lowest, Stevens, with an elevation of 4061 feet, was the choice of the Great Northern. Instead of having used one of the remaining passes, the Northern Pacific Railroad made its way from one side of the Range to the other by means of the Stampede Tunnel, about eleven miles from Easton. Naches Pass is the fifth lowest, while Chinook Pass, selected for the highway across the Cascades, ranks ninth, with an elevation of 5440 feet. H the Cascade Range was such a hindrance to the on-coming railroads, what must it have been to the emigrants! No wonder that those coming from the east to settle in the Puget Sound country em­ barked on long sea voyages around the Horn, or came across the plains by wagon trains until they reached the Columbia, then went by boat down the river and up one of its tributaries, then perhaps overland for some distance, and possibly a trip on some portion of the Sound to their destinations.
    [Show full text]