Whooping Crane Scientific Name: Grus Americana Federal Status: Endangered, 6/2/70 • State Status: Endangered

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whooping Crane Scientific Name: Grus Americana Federal Status: Endangered, 6/2/70 • State Status: Endangered Whooping Crane Scientific Name: Grus americana Federal Status: Endangered, 6/2/70 • State Status: Endangered Description of age, white feathers begin to appear only 500 to 1,400 Whooping Cranes The stately Whooping Crane is the on the neck and back. Juvenile feath- inhabited North America in 1870. tallest bird found in North America, ers are replaced through the winter Although the exact number is with males approaching nearly five months. By the following spring, juve- unknown, Whooping Cranes were feet in height. Adult birds are white nile plumage is primarily white, with uncommon, and their numbers overall with some red and black on rusty colored feathers remaining only had rapidly declined by the late the head. Their inner wing feathers on the head, upper neck, and on the 19th century. droop over the rump in a “bustle” tips of wing feathers. Young birds In the mid 1800’s, the principal that distinguishes cranes from herons. generally have adult plumage by late breeding range extended from central With a seven foot wingspan and a in their second summer. Illinois northwestward through north- slow wing beat, Whooping Cranes fly There are a number of birds that ern Iowa, western Minnesota, north- with their long necks and legs fully may appear similar to the Whooping eastern North Dakota, southern extended. When in flight, the birds’ Crane. The Sandhill Crane, the Manitoba and Saskatchewan, to the black wingtips or primary feathers Whooping Crane’s closest relative, is area near Edmonton, Alberta. The gray in color, not white. Also, Sandhill Cranes are Wood Buffalo somewhat smaller, with a National Park wingspan of about five feet. Sandhill Cranes occur in flocks of two to Canada hundreds, whereas Whooping Cranes are most often seen in flocks of two to as many as 10 to 15, although they sometimes migrate with Grays Lake National Main flock Wildlife Refuge Sandhill Cranes. Snow Foster flock Geese and White Pelicans are white birds with black wingtips, however both of Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuge these birds have short legs that do not extend beyond the tail when in Bosque del Apache flight. In addition, Snow National Wildlife Refuge Geese generally occur in large flocks, are much Aransas National smaller, and fly with a Wildlife Refuge rapid wing beat. White Pelicans fly with their neck folded and can be distinguished Whooping Crane disappeared from the by their long yellow bill. Finally, heart of its breeding range in the swans are all white and have short north-central United States by the legs, and herons and egrets fly with 1890’s. The last documented nesting their long necks folded. in southern Canada occurred in Saskatchewan in 1922. By 1937, only Whooping Crane © USFWS Steve Van Riper Status and two small breeding populations Distribution remained; a nonmigratory population can be seen, and their long legs The historical range of the Whooping in southwestern Louisiana and a extend beyond their tail. Their dark Crane extended from the Arctic coast migratory population that wintered on olive-gray beaks are long and pointed. south to central Mexico, and from the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge The area at the base of the beak is Utah east to New Jersey, South Car- (NWR) on the Texas coast and nested pink and the eyes are yellow. The olina, Georgia, and Florida. Distribu- in a location that at the time was Whooping Crane’s call, from which it tion of fossil remains suggests a unknown. The remnant population in derives its name, has been described wider distribution during the cooler, southwestern Louisiana was reduced as a shrill, bugle-like trumpeting. wetter climate of the Pleistocene. from 13 to 6 birds following a hurri- Whooping Crane chicks are a red- Although once numbering above dish cinnamon color. At four months 10,000, it has been estimated that Whooping Crane 1 cane in 1940, and the last individual Although not yet of breeding age, the was taken into captivity in 1950. In birds led south in both 2001 and the winter of 1938-39, only 14 adult 2002 returned north on their own and 4 juvenile Whooping Cranes were the following spring. found on the Aransas NWR. The nest- ing area of the Aransas Wildlife Habitat Refuge population was discovered in Within Wood Buffalo NP, Whooping 1954 in Wood Buffalo National Park Cranes nest in poorly drained wet- (NP), Northwest Territories, Canada. lands interspersed with numerous This population is the only historical potholes (small areas of open water). one that survives. These wetlands are separated by nar- Whooping Cranes currently exist row ridges that support trees such as in three wild populations and a white and black spruce, tamarack, breeding population kept in captivity. and willows, and shrubs such as The species numbers approximately dwarf birch, Labrador tea, and bear- 420 birds, all in Canada and the berry. Bulrush is the dominant plant United States. The only self-sustaining in areas used by nesting birds, wild population is the one that win- although cattail, sedge, musk-grass Whooping Crane at Aransas National Wildlife Refuge © TPWD Bill Reaves ters on the Texas coast and nests pri- and other aquatic plants are common. marily within Wood Buffalo NP. In Nest sites are often located in the 2002, this population consisted of 50 rushes or sedges of marshes and nesting pairs, with a total of 185 sloughs, or along lake margins. An birds wintering in Texas. abundance of invertebrates, such as In 1975, Whooping Crane eggs mollusks, crustaceans, and aquatic were transferred from Wood Buffalo insects have been found in the ponds NP to Grays Lake National Wildlife near occupied nests. Refuge in Idaho and placed in Sand- Whooping Cranes use a variety of hill Crane nests in an effort to estab- habitats during their long migrations lish a migratory population in the between northern Canada and the Rocky Mountains. The Rocky Moun- Texas coast. Croplands are used for tain birds spend the summer in feeding, and large wetland areas are Idaho, western Wyoming, and south- used for feeding and roosting. western Montana, and winter in the Whooping Cranes are known to roost middle Rio Grande Valley of New in riverine habitat along the Platte, Mexico. Reintroductions ended in Middle Loup, and Niobrara Rivers in 1989 after the adult Whooping Nebraska, Cimarron River in Okla- Cranes did not pair up or mate due homa, and the Red River in Texas. to imprinting problems from their The birds often roost on submerged Whooping Crane chick foster Sandhill Crane parents. The sandbars in wide unobstructed chan- © USFWS last Whooping Crane in the flock nels isolated from human disturbance. died in 2002. Whooping Cranes also use large wet- Life History The second persisting wild popu- land areas associated with lakes for Whooping Cranes usually mate for lation in 2003 consisted of approxi- roosting and feeding during migration. life, although they will remate follow- mately 90 birds remaining from over The Whooping Crane’s principal ing the death of their mate. They 250 captive-reared Whooping Cranes wintering habitat consists of about mature at 3 to 4 years of age, and released in central Florida south of 22,500 acres of marshes and salt flats most females are capable of producing Orlando beginning in 1993. These on Aransas National Wildlife Refuge eggs by 4 years of age. It is estimated birds were released as the first step and adjacent publicly and privately that Whooping Cranes can live up to in an effort to establish a non- owned wetlands. Plants such as salt 22 to 24 years in the wild. Captive migratory population in Florida, and grass, saltwort, smooth cordgrass, individuals live 30 to 40 years. in 2002, produced the first whooping glasswort, and sea ox-eye dominate Whooping Cranes begin leaving crane chick born in the wild in the the outer marshes. At slightly higher the Texas coast in late March and United States since 1939. elevations, Gulf cordgrass is more early April, returning to their nesting The third wild population was common. The interior portions of area in Wood Buffalo NP by late initiated in 2001 when several young the refuge are characterized by oak April. Experienced pairs arrive first captive-reared whooping cranes were mottes, grassland, swales, and ponds and normally nest in the same vicin- released in potential nesting habitat on gently rolling sandy soils. Live ity each year. Nesting territories at Necedah National Wildlife Refuge oak, redbay, and bluestems are typi- vary considerably in size, ranging in Wisconsin. The young birds were cal plants found on upland sites. from 0.5 to 1.8 square miles. From trained to migrate to Florida’s Gulf Upland sites have been managed the start of egg laying until the Coast by following ultra light aircraft. using grazing, mowing, and con- chicks are a few months old, the trolled burning. About 14,250 acres birds’ activities are restricted to the of grassland are managed for cranes, breeding territory. Eggs are normally 2 Whooping Crane waterfowl, and other wildlife. laid in late April to mid May, and mally migrate as a single, pair, family flapping, head bowing, and leaps into group, or in small flocks, sometimes the air by one or both birds, increase accompanying Sandhill Cranes. in frequency. These rituals serve to Flocks of up to 10 sub-adults have forge and strengthen pair bonds. Fam- been observed feeding at stopover ily groups and pairs usually depart areas. Whooping Cranes migrate dur- first, normally between March 25 and ing the day, and make nightly stops April 15. The last birds are usually to feed and rest. Although they use a gone by May 1, but occasional strag- variety of habitats during migration, glers may stay into mid-May.
Recommended publications
  • Quantifying Crop Damage by Grey Crowned Crane Balearica
    QUANTIFYING CROP DAMAGE BY GREY CROWNED CRANE BALEARICA REGULORUM REGULORUM AND EVALUATING CHANGES IN CRANE DISTRIBUTION IN THE NORTH EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA. By MARK HARRY VAN NIEKERK Department of the Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2010 Supervisor: Prof. Adrian Craig i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of tables…………………………………………………………………………iv List of figures ………………………………………………………………………...v Abstract………………………………………………………………………………vii I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 Species account......................................................................................... 3 Habits and diet ........................................................................................... 5 Use of agricultural lands by cranes ............................................................ 6 Crop damage by cranes ............................................................................. 7 Evaluating changes in distribution and abundance of Grey Crowned Crane………………………………………………………..9 Objectives of the study………………………………………………………...12 II. STUDY AREA…………………………………………………………………...13 Locality .................................................................................................... 13 Climate ..................................................................................................... 15 Geology and soils ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grey Crowned Cranes
    grey crowned cranes www.olpejetaconservancy.org GREY CROWNED CRANES are one of 15 species of crane. Their name comes from the impressive spray of stiff golden feathers that form a crown around their heads. Crowned cranes inhabit a range of wetlands and prefer short to medium height open grasslands for foraging. THREATS TO CROWNED CRANES The grey crowned crane is categorised as Endangered in the IUCN Red List. Populations have decreased significantly, estimated at around 80% since 1985. The main threats to cranes are habitat loss, illegal trade, and poisoning. They are considered status symbols among the wealthy. Birds are captured and eggs removed and illegally sold in large numbers. As human settlements expand, cranes are closer to farmland which they forage millet and potatoes. Large numbers are killed each year in Kenya as retaliation or to prevent crop damage. CROWNED CRANES AT OL PEJETA Ol Pejeta sits in Laikipia County which has the 5th largest crowned crane population in Kenya. In 2019, nearly 160 crown cranes were counted at the conservancy. Unfortunately, the population has been observed to be OL PEJETA on a decline. 160 POPULATION The cranes utilise marshy areas across the conservancy. Flocks of 10- 30 individuals are often observed on neighbouring wheat farms. They migrate into Ol Pejeta in search of food and are seen in large numbers during the rainy season. DID YOU KNOW? CROWNED CRANES TRACKS Crowned cranes mate for life. They dance together and preen each others necks to help strengthen their bond. www.olpejetaconservancy.org [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • 157 Common Crane Put Your Logo Here
    Javier Blasco -Zumeta & Gerd -Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here 157 Common Crane Put your logo here SEXING Plumage of both sexes alike. Size and colour on base of bill can be useful in extreme birds: male with wing longer than 585 mm, base of bill bright red; female with wing shorter than 560 mm, base of bill duller red. MOULT Complete postbreeding moult but not all years since flight feathers are all changed every 2nd to perhaps even every 4th years. Partial postjuve- nile moult involving only many body feathers; usually finished by October. PHENOLOGY I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII COMMON CRANE (Grus grus ) STATUS IN ARAGON IDENTIFICATION - On passage and winter visitor, with presen- 108 140 cm. Adult with slate grey plumage; ce mainly in Gallocanta and some places of throat, nape and sides of face black; white sides of head and neck; red crown; black primaries; the Ebro Basin. long secondaries forming a bushy tail; long legs. Juvenile with brown plumage; chestnut head; shorter secondaries. SIMILAR SPECIES This species is unmistakable AGEING Since the species doesn’t breed in Aragon, only 3 types of age can be recognized: 1st year autumn/2nd year spring with a patch of black tinged red skin on crown; rufous head and upper neck; with a pale patch behind the eye; ash grey body, usually with feathers on upperparts edged brown. 2nd year autumn/3rd year spring like adult , but crown not as bare; some retained old brown feathers on scapulars; wing coverts, tertials and underparts; usually with juvenile primaries and secondaries, which are narrower and pointed than in adult .
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Threats to Anatidae in Iran
    Bird Conservation International (2015) 25 :242 –257 . © BirdLife International, 2014 doi:10.1017/S0959270914000264 An assessment of threats to Anatidae in Iran ELHAM NOURANI , MOHAMMAD KABOLI and BEN COLLEN Summary The network of wetland systems in Iran provides valuable staging and wintering areas for waterbirds in the African-Western Eurasian flyways. The West Siberian/Caspian/Nile popula- tions of Anatidae (ducks, geese and swans) regularly overwinter and stop over in Iran, and are considered an economically and culturally important group of birds in the country. Conservation of such migratory birds requires the identification of key threat factors impacting them throughout the flyway. Since documented data on the status and threats facing Anatidae in Iran are very scarce, in this paper, we attempted to determine the general population trends for the 26 Anatidae species in Iran, using annual waterbird census data, and to identify and score the most important threat factors affecting each species, by consulting the top ornithologists and pro- fessional birdwatchers in the country by means of a survey. Our results indicate that the most prevalent threats affecting all 26 species are dam construction, water management practices, and hunting. Our results provide the necessary material for Red List assessment of these species at the national level, an important tool for conservation priority setting within Iran and in the flyway. Introduction Waterbirds have long been the subject of many international conservation agreements. The Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) and the Agreement on the Conservation of African- Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA, 1999), among others, urge countries to work together to save migratory waterbirds through the flyway concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Brolga Grus Rubicunda
    Action StatementNo 119 Brolga Grus rubicunda Indexof Action Stetements *xDescription and Distribution * LifeHistorv and Ecoloqv *ConservationStatus *Decline andThreats *ManaqeqentAgtion *xReferences **Compilers Brolga, Grus rubicunda (illustrationby SusannaHaffenden) Descriptionand Distribution The BrolgaGrus rubicunda (Perry) is a large,long-necked 'lr cranestanding to 1.8metres in height.They have long, darklegs and their plumage is predominanflylight grey in colour.The average wing span of an adultis 1.7-2.4 "k-: metres.The adultmale weighs 4.7-8.7 kilograms and the female3.7-7 .3 kilograms(Marchant and Higgins 1993). Adultshave a conspicuousorange-red head which contrastswith the barecrown of greenish-greyskin and the darkerpendulous dewlap. The billis dark,long and straightand relativelylarge compared to the head.The iris ..;;, is yellowto reddish-orange.lmmatures (up to 10 months of age)have a grey,fully feathered head and the irisis darkbrown. Juveniles (11to22 months)gradually lose the headfeathering and attainthe red headcolouring. A fulldescription can be foundin Marchantand Higgins illrtr{but}on In Vlcteria (1ee3) +b€fere 1970 I sincg ,1570 {s+urce: S#as of tf,efonsr $,!#dlds.FlftE lgSSl The Brolgais distributedacross New Guinea, northern andsouth-eastern Australia (Blakers et al. 1g84, Marchantand Higgins1993). The populationsin Victoria andSouth Australia may now be isolatedfrom the northernpopulations as thereappear to be onlyscattered birdsin NewSouth Wales. In Victoria,birds are currentlyfound in the south-west,the NorthernPlains and adjacentparts of the MurrayRiver (Emison et al.1987).The specieswas formerlymore widely distributed and common,being recorded from the Melbournearea, Gippsland and North-easternVictoria (White 1e83). Life historyand ecology The Brolgais omnivorousand utilisesa diverserange of fooditems on a seasonalbasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Wintering Behavior of a Siberian Crane Grus Leucogeranus in Niigata, Japan, with Special Regard to Food, Foraging and Vocal Habits
    Ornithol Sci 17: 187 – 194 (2018) ORIGINAL ARTICLE Wintering behavior of a Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus in Niigata, Japan, with special regard to food, foraging and vocal habits Akira CHIBA#,* 1-13-11 Terao-Higashi, Niigata 950–2054, Japan ORNITHOLOGICAL Abstract An immature Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus straggled to Niigata, Japan, in late autumn 2016 and remained over winter in an area of rice fields. In this SCIENCE paper the bird’s diet and foraging behavior during winter 2016/2017 are described. © The Ornithological Society During daytime, the crane foraged alone, mostly on post-harvest rice fields where of Japan 2018 it fed almost exclusively on Water Chestnut Eleocharis kuroguwai tubers. Other foods, such as rice grains, earthworms, grasshoppers and fishes, though eaten, were negligible in the bird’s diet. The density of water chestnut tubers in the foraging area was estimated to be 3.1±3.0/m2 and the biomass 2.0±2.1 g/m2. The crane’s foraging behavior generally included removing any superficial covering material, digging into and removing the soil, exploring the food in the beak and then consuming it with or without rinsing it in groundwater. During foraging, the frequency of food intake varied from 4.8±2.0/10 min to 41.3±9.5/10 min. These results indicate the great significance of water chestnuts in the diet of the Siberian Crane in winter, although further study is necessary for generalization. Key words Diet, Foraging, Grus leucogeranus, Rice field, Water chestnuts The Siberian Crane Grus leucogeranus is regarded al. 2017). Such information has contributed to our as a critically endangered species by the International understanding of the current situation of the species Union for Conservation of Nature, with a global pop- in the wild, and has promoted further investigation ulation of 3,500 to 4,000 individuals (Bird Life Inter- and conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • First Arizona Record of Common Crane
    Arizona Birds - Journal of Arizona Field Ornithologists Volume 2020 FIRST ARIZONA RECORD OF COMMON CRANE JOE CROUSE,1125 W. SHULLENBARGER DR., FLAGSTAFF, AZ 86005 The first record of a Common Crane (Grus grus), a Eurasian species, in Arizona was reported in May 2017 at Mormon Lake in Coconino County. It remained at this lake through September 2017. In 2019 a Common Crane was reported 11 May through 31 August at Mormon Lake. The 2017 record has been reviewed and accepted by the Arizona Bird Committee (Rosenberg et al. 2019), and the 2019 bird has been accepted as the same individual. The Common Crane is a widespread crane found in Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa. Breeding occurs across northern Europe and northern Asia, from Norway on the west to Siberia on the east. Nonbreeding populations are found as far west as Morocco and to southeastern China. A resident population exists in Turkey (NatureServe and IUCN 2017, Figure 1). Preferred habitat for both breeding and nonbreeding birds is small ponds or lakes, wet meadows, and other wetland areas (Cramp and Simmons 1980). Figure 1. Common Crane Distribution Cramp and Simmons (1980) stated that the Common Crane range in western Europe has had a “marked” decrease since the Middle Ages. They attributed this to the draining of nesting areas. Since 1950 improved habitat protections, recolonization in previously inhabited areas, and designation as a protected species have resulted in a dramatic increase in the overall population (Prange 2005). Although its range has decreased, it continues to be extensive enough, along with the increase in its already large population, to give it the status of a species of “Least Concern” (BirdLife International 2016, NatureServe and IUCN 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • AOU Classification Committee – North and Middle America
    AOU Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2016-C No. Page Title 01 02 Change the English name of Alauda arvensis to Eurasian Skylark 02 06 Recognize Lilian’s Meadowlark Sturnella lilianae as a separate species from S. magna 03 20 Change the English name of Euplectes franciscanus to Northern Red Bishop 04 25 Transfer Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis to Antigone 05 29 Add Rufous-necked Wood-Rail Aramides axillaris to the U.S. list 06 31 Revise our higher-level linear sequence as follows: (a) Move Strigiformes to precede Trogoniformes; (b) Move Accipitriformes to precede Strigiformes; (c) Move Gaviiformes to precede Procellariiformes; (d) Move Eurypygiformes and Phaethontiformes to precede Gaviiformes; (e) Reverse the linear sequence of Podicipediformes and Phoenicopteriformes; (f) Move Pterocliformes and Columbiformes to follow Podicipediformes; (g) Move Cuculiformes, Caprimulgiformes, and Apodiformes to follow Columbiformes; and (h) Move Charadriiformes and Gruiformes to precede Eurypygiformes 07 45 Transfer Neocrex to Mustelirallus 08 48 (a) Split Ardenna from Puffinus, and (b) Revise the linear sequence of species of Ardenna 09 51 Separate Cathartiformes from Accipitriformes 10 58 Recognize Colibri cyanotus as a separate species from C. thalassinus 11 61 Change the English name “Brush-Finch” to “Brushfinch” 12 62 Change the English name of Ramphastos ambiguus 13 63 Split Plain Wren Cantorchilus modestus into three species 14 71 Recognize the genus Cercomacroides (Thamnophilidae) 15 74 Split Oceanodroma cheimomnestes and O. socorroensis from Leach’s Storm- Petrel O. leucorhoa 2016-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee p. 453 Change the English name of Alauda arvensis to Eurasian Skylark There are a dizzying number of larks (Alaudidae) worldwide and a first-time visitor to Africa or Mongolia might confront 10 or more species across several genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Measures for the Siberian Crane
    CMS Technical Report Series No. 25 Conservation Measures for the Siberian Crane Prepared by the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals in collaboration with the International Crane Foundation Fifth Edition Federal Office for the Environment Switzerland Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (UNEP/CMS). Recommended citation: Conservation Measures for the Siberian Crane, Fifth Edition. 2011. UNEP/CMS Sec- retariat, Bonn, Germany. 202 pages. Cover photograph © Zhou Haixiang Technical Report Series No 25 Prepared by: UNEP/CMS Secretariat in collaboration with the International Crane Foundation Editing by Elena Ilyashenko, Crawford Prentice, Claire Mirande, Elena Smirenski, Marco Barbieri, Christiane Röttger and Douglas Hykle © 2011 UNEP/CMS. This publication, except the cover photograph, may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational and other non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The UNEP/CMS Secretariat would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes whatsoever without prior permission from the United Nations Environmental Programme. DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessary reflect the views of UNEP/CMS or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/CMS or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area in its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperiled Coastal Birds of Florida and the State Laws That Protect Them
    Reddish Egret Roseate Spoonbill Threatened (S) Threatened (S) Imperiled Coastal The rarest heron in North Using spatulala-shaped Birds of Florida America, Reddish Egrets bills to feel prey in shallow are strictly coastal. They ponds, streams, or coastal and the chase small fish on open waters, Roseate Spoonbills State Laws that flats. They nest in small nest in trees along the numbers on estuary coast and inland. Having Protect Them islands, usually in colonies barely recovered from with other nesting wading hunting eradication, these birds. This mid-sized heron birds now face extirpation is mostly gray with rust- from climate change and colored head, though some sea-level rise. birds are solid white. Wood Stork Florida Sandhill Threatened (F) Florida Statutes and Rules Crane This large wading bird Threatened (S) is the only stork in the 68A-27.003 Designation and management of the state- This crane subspecies is Americas. Breeding areas listed species and coordination with federal government for resident year-round in have shifted from south federally-listed species Florida, and defends a Florida and the Everglades nesting territory that is northward. Wood Storks 68A-19.005 General Regulations relating to state- must have abundant prey adjacent to open upland designated Critical Wildlife Areas foraging habitat. Nesting concentrated in shallow in shallow ponds, adults wetlands in order to feed 68A-4.001 Controls harvest of wildlife only under permitted defend their eggs or chicks their young. Prey items from predators including include
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the North American Crane Working Group
    - Newsletter of the North American Crane Working Group - Vol. 29 No. 2 Fall 2018 — Fall 2019 President’s Report he North American Crane Workshop is T the key activity of the North American Crane Working Group. Workshop 15 will be held 8-11 January 2020 in Lubbock, Texas. NACWG is finalizing preparations, especially with the great job done by Dr. Blake Grisham and Kathy Brautigam, Texas Tech University, on local arrangements. Two days of presentations will include a Plenary session on Texas High Plains issues plus special Symposia on the past 10 years of research on the Aransas-Wood Buffalo whooping crane population, effects of telemetry and marking on cranes, and human dimensions of crane conservation. Overall, the science program includes 34 oral and 14 poster presentations (see pages 16-19). Two student travel awards have been granted. The Workshop will provide Sandhill Cranes at Muleshoe National Wildlife Refuge field trips to view wildlife and habitat management on nearby Muleshoe National Photo: Christena Stephens Wildlife Refuge and a local ranch. An introductory social will include a Texas BBQ dinner and special presentations. Other activities include a silent auction, open business meeting to elect the Working Group Board and plan for the next workshop, and the concluding Banquet, highlighted by presentation of the Walkinshaw Award, our most prestigious recognition of merit. Registration is now open and along with more details can be found on our website at: http://www.nacwg.org/ workshop15.html Your Board of Directors welcomes your input. Let us know how we are doing and feel free to offer your suggestions on how we can further contribute to conservation of cranes in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bird's EYE View on Flyways
    A BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON FLywayS A brief tour by the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals IMPRINT Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) A BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON FLywayS A brief tour by the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals UNEP / CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 68 pages. Produced by UNEP/CMS Text based on a report by Joost Brouwer in colaboration with Gerard Boere Coordinator Francisco Rilla, CMS Secretariat, E-mail: [email protected] Editing & Proof Reading Hanah Al-Samaraie, Robert Vagg Editing Assistant Stéphanie de Pury Publishing Manager Hanah Al-Samaraie, Email: [email protected] Design Karina Waedt © 2009 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP or contributory organizations.The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contrib- utory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area in its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]