1 Component-I (A) – Personal Details

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Component-I (A) – Personal Details Component-I (A) – Personal details: 1 Component-I (B) – Description of module: Subject Name Indian Culture Paper Name Outlines of Indian History Module Name/Title Pre-historic Cultures in India Module Id I C/ OIH/ 04 Knowledge in origin and evolution of Pre-historic Pre-requisites cultures To know the pre-historic cultures in India and its Objectives salient features Keywords Pre- historic/ Paleolithic / Neolihtic / Megalithic E-text (Quadrant-I) 1. Introduction The whole of Indian subcontinent is rich in archaeological sites and remains. Pre-historic sites are both numerous and obvious in much of the Indian subcontinent. It is not therefore, surprising that the stone tools of the Palaeolithic period were found and recognized in India only shortly after they had received official recognition in Europe. The rediscovery of ancient India was in origin almost entirely European, indeed to a large extent British. Robert Bruce Foote, a British Geologist, has rightly been called as the “Father of Indian Pre-history”. During the sixties, seventies and eighties of 19thcentury, he worked unceasingly in the field, and wherever his geological duties took him, he discovered archaeological treasure in the shape of Pre-historic remains. It is true to say that almost every important Pre-historic site in peninsular India vowed its discovery to him. In 1863, Foote discovered the first Indian Paleolithic artifact from a locality at Pallavaram, near Madras (now Chennai). During 1850s Colonel Meadows Taylor carried out number of outstanding excavations of Megalithic graves in Hyderabad State. Prior to it, M.C. Burkitt of Cambridge University, England published an account of the collection of a Magistrate, L.A. Cammaide, from the Krishna basin, and Professors H. De Terra and T.T. Patterson led the Yale-Cambridge Expedition to study the glacial sequence of Kashmir and the Punjab and to relate their findings to the Pre-historic industries of the Punjab, Narmada and Madras. Another archaeologist who contributed greatly to our knowledge of Indian Pre-history was Sir Aurel Stein, whose continuing expeditions led him to Baluchistan and eastern Iran, the Punjab, and North West Frontier Province, no less than to more remote regions of Central Asia. 2. History and Prehistory The period for which written records are available and used as a primary source in understanding the past is historic period, and all periods proceeding this fall under prehistory. The settled life of human past, which led to development of civilizations, and urban centres for which written records are available, yet undeciphered falls under a separate division, at least in India, which is known as proto-history. The Harappan civilization 2 falls under this category along with the cultures immediately preceding (chalcolithic) and succeeding (Iron Age) it. Indian prehistory, following several models and based on the evidence of sites of different cultural ages, has been divided into (i) Palaeolithic, (ii) Mesolithic / Microlithic, (iii) Neolithic and (iv) Megalithic periods. The Palaeolithic period is further divided into (i) Lower, (ii) Middle and (iii) Upper palaeolithic periods or cultures, based on stone tool making technologies, styles and stratigraphic sequence. 3. The Palaeolithic Age The word ‘paleo’ means old and ‘lith’ is stone and therefore it is also called Old Stone Age. It is the earliest period in India where the first human habitation was noticed. The predominant tool prepared and used during this age is of stone, probably supplemented by wooden, bone antler tools. The communities were living in open air or cave settlements. The evidence for cave settlements comes from sites like Bhimbetka in Madhya Pradesh. The Palaeolithic is further sub-divided into lower, middle and upper palaeolithic periods and the chronology varies from region to region. The findings of early Miocene hominoids like Sivapithecus (14 to 7 Ma) and Ramapithecus (13 to 9 Ma) from the Siwalik deposits of India and Pakistan are a good evidence of primate evolution in Indian sub-continent. Even though the Narmada valley and other river valleys did reveal fossils of faunal species, human fossils are always scanty. In the Narmada valley, faunal remains of species like Bos namadicus, Sus namadicus, Hexaprotodon namadicus, Elephas hysudricus, Equus namadicus and Stegodon-insignis-ganesa belonging to Middle Pleistocene are found associated with Acheulian artefacts. The only hominid fossil remain is that of an archaic Homo sapiens from Hathnora, near Hoshangabad in the Narmada valley. The fossil was found in association with stone tools of late Acheulian type from eroded gravels. A general date of 125,000 is agreed among the scholars for the date of this hominid remains. Petraglia observes that the geographical and environmental conditions determined the palaeolithic occupation in the Indian subcontinent and identifies distinct ‘regions and eco- zones’ consisting broadly of the (i) greater and lesser Himalayan region, (ii) adjoining Siwaliks, (iii) Indo-Gangetic plains and (iv) peninsular India. 3.1 Lower Palaeolithic The Lower Palaeolithic in India, about which we have as yet very little cultural information beyond that to be gained from the stone tools themselves, which include hand-axe industries which generally parallel to those of Western Asia, Europe and Africa, but with certain differences and exceptions. The principal tools are the hand-axe and the cleaver, core tools of discoidal and elliptical outline made in a similar manner to the hand-axes, chopping tools of various types and flakes. The studies conducted by various scholars indicate that the earliest hominin occupation in Indian sub-continent belongs to Acheulian. The dates for earliest hominin occupation in the form of stone tool assemblages are also available from several sites like Riwat in Pakistan (1.9 ma) while well dated Acheulian sequences in Pakistan date between 800 and 700 ka. The overall time bracket for Acheulian assemblages in India is between 400 and 300 ka even though an ESR date of 1.2 Ma is reported from Isampur. The various eco-zones in the Himalayan, Siwaliks and peninsular region have yielded a number of Acheulian bearing sites in different ecological and topographical settings, while it has been interpreted that the Indo- Gangetic plains could have served as a barrier for large-scale human dispersals between the Himalayan and peninsular India, due to the paucity of raw materials. 3 The evidence for lower palaeolithic presence from the Indian subcontinent is found from sites like Riwat (in Pakistan) on the Soan River, datable to around 1.9 Ma. Another locality yielding early presence is from Pabbi Hills in Upper Siwalik region (in Pakistan), consisting of stone artefacts (simple cores and flakes) on erosional surfaces of fossiliferous deposits. Three such deposits have been dated to ages ranging between 1.4-1.2 Ma; 0.9-1.2 Ma and 1.7-2.2 Ma. While the earlier studies undertaken by De Terra and Paterson tried to identify differences in Soan (unifacial tools on cores and rarer bifacial pieces)and Acheulian (standardized bifaces consisting of handaxes, cleavers and picks on cores and flakes) industries, Petraglia identifies that there is no distinct Soan-Acheulian dichotomy even though there is a generally recognized technological and typological difference between them. Lower Palaeolithic remains are also found from several other localities in the sub-continent like valleys of the Beas River, another tributary of the Indus,Attirampakkam, Pallavaram near Chennai, Kurnool, Cuddapah, Nellore, Prakasam, Guntur, Anantapuram, Nalgonda, Warangal, Karimnagar, Adilabad districts in Andhra Pradesh in the river valleys of Penna, Gundlakamma, Krishna, Godavari and their tributaries and in the rock-shelters at Billasurgam (Kurnool), Hunsgi and Baichbal, Tungabhadra, Bhima, Malaprabha, river valleys and at other places. The excavations in a cave at Gudiyam, near Attirampakkam have shown that the early man has not regularly and continuously inhabited the cave. The site of Isampur revealed a remarkably preserved tool manufacturing industry and occupation activities. A considerable number of caves and rock shelters have been examined and excavated by several archaeologists. R.V. Joshi excavated Adamgarh Hills in Narmada valley and found lower palaeolithic and Mesolithic assemblages. The stone tools of lower palaeolithic comprised of hand-axes, chopping tools, ovates, and a few cleavers. A continuous human occupation starting from lower palaeolithic is indicated from the remains at Bhimbetka caves in Madhya Pradesh. The majority of the tools found in all parts of the sub-continent are made of quartzite. Sometimes pebbles were used, particularly for making the earlier and cruder hand-axes, and for making chopping tools at all periods. The other source of quartzite was outcrops of rock and boulders. Factory sites of both pebbles and boulders of various sizes had clearly provided the raw material and can be seen in various parts of India. The stone hand-axes were hafted to wooden handles for easy handling of the same for cutting the flesh of the animals and for cutting the roots of the trees. 3.2 Middle Palaeolithic The Middle Palaeolithic tool industry is characterized by flake core types, which is distinct from the previous bifacial industry of Acheulian. Further, it is also identified based on stratigraphy, changes in tool technologies and styles. The prepared core technique or the Levallois technique, which appears during the Middle Palaeolithic
Recommended publications
  • From Africa to Eurasia * Early Dispersals Ofer Bar-Yosef! *, A
    Quaternary International 75 (2001) 19}28 From Africa to Eurasia * early dispersals Ofer Bar-Yosef! *, A. Belfer-Cohen" !Department of Anthropology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA "Institute of Archaeology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel Abstract The dispersals of early hominins in the late Pliocene or early Pleistocene into Eurasia were essentially sporadic. Little geographic and temporal continuity is observed between the various dated archaeological contexts, and the lithic assemblages do not demonstrate a techno-morphological continuity. The archaeological evidence from 1.8 to 0.7 Ma indicates at least three waves of early migrations. The earliest sortie involved bearers of core-chopper industries sometime around 1.7}1.6 Ma. Early Acheulean producers followed possibly around 1.4 Ma. The third wave occurred sometime around 0.8 Ma, and is represented by Acheulean groups who manufactured numerous #ake cleavers. The geographic scope of each of these waves is not yet well known.The reasons for &why' early humans dispersed from Africa into Eurasia include the &push' of environmental change and relative &demographic pressure', as well as the opening of new niches. Humans may have gained their meat supplies either from carcasses or through active predation. The archaeological and fossil records demonstrate that Homo erectus was a successful species, and like other successful species it enlarged its geographic distribution at all costs. Even if the trigger for the initial dispersal of Homo erectus remains unknown or controversial, the success of the hominid occupation of the Eurasian habitats was not primarily facilitated by the availability of food, or the human #exibility in food procuring techniques, but by the absence of the zoonotic diseases that plagued and constrained hominins in their African &cradle of evolution'.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    BOOK REVIEWS Indian Beads: A Cultural aud Technological Study. Shantaram Bha1chandra Deo. Pune: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, 2000. 205 pp., 7 color, 37 b/w plates, 3 maps, 24 figures, bibliography, no index. Paper 600 rupees. No ISBN. Distinctive Beads in Ancient India. Maurya Jyotsna. BAR International Series 864. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2000. 122 pp., 1 map, 10 figures, 7 tables, bibliography, index. Paper cover. ISBN 1-84171-067-9. Amulets and Pendants in Ancient Maharashtra. Maurya Jyotsna. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2000. 102 pp., 4 maps, 12 figures, 3 tables, bibliography, index. Cloth 220 rupees. ISBN 81-246-0158-5. Reviewed by PETER FRANCIS JR. (1945-2003), former Director of the Centerfor Bead Research, Lake Placid, New York India is one of the world's largest countries rate with him on a book. That project with one of its most ancient civilizations. never happened, as Dikshit passed away in Blessed with immense natural and human 19(}9, just before his own History (?f Indian resources. It is no surprise that it is a lead­ Class was published. ing source of beads in both ancient and Deo received a fellowship from the In­ modern times. Only China is larger and as dian Council of Historical Research to ancient, but the Chinese have never been study and prepare a manuscript on Indian as interested in beads as have the Indians. beads during the years 1985 to 1988. He The Indian subcontinent has been unparal­ worked on the project for many years, long leled in terms of bead making, bead trad­ after the period of the fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Stone Age Technology in India
    Stone AEe Technologv in India K,PADDAYYA ABSTRACT This paper presents a review of various aspects of Stone Age (Palaeolithic and Mesolithic) general technology in lndia. After initial remarks about the history of Prehistoric studies and culture Sequence, detailed observations are made about how changes in raw material of utilization, experienced from time to time, and consequent improvements in techniques tool-manufacture and tooltypes themselves led to changes in subsistence and settlement patterns of Stone Age hunter-gatherer groups. The review concludes with remarks highlighting the need for identification of regional settlement systems, functional interpretation of lithic of non- assemblages, study of present-day use of stone for various purposes, and recognition utilitarian dimensions of Stone Age technology. CONTENTS l.lNTRODUCT10N 2.HISttORY OF PREHISttORiC RESEARCH 3 FIRST PARADIGM 4.PARADIGM SHIFT 5.FRESH FIELD RESEARCH 6.GENERAL CULttURE SEQUENCE 7.USE OF ORCANIC MAttERIALS 8.LITHIC ttECHNOLOGY A.lmprovements in raw mateHal ulllza10n 9.SttUDIES iN TECHNOLOGY A.Lower PalaeolithlC B.Mlddle and Upper Palaeolithic C.Mesolnhic 10 GENERALTRENDS ロ ロ 暉 r‐ ‐ ロ ロ 口 ‐ 甲 甲 ― ― ― ― ― ■ ■ 口 ‐ 口 ‐ 口 甲 暉 "― ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 甲 ・ |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||■ ANCIENT INDiA,NEW SERIES,NO.1 11. TASKS AHEAD A" Regional adaPtive sYstems B. Functional interPretations C. Rspects of non-utilitarian behaviour learning D. Ethnography as a source of 「 IIIiDIDNOTPROGRESSUNIFORMLYORSTEADILYBUTHEDIDPROGRESSONTHE1/VHOLE MAKING AND T00L― USiNG CREATURE WHO FROM A FAIRLY INEFFICIENT AN!MAL TO A T00L― DOMINATED THE VVHOLE PLANET BY HIS NUMBERS AND B漱 ::[:η晏[li:Fギ ∫」][担 ACTIVITY,AND HAS NOⅥ′ONLY TO LEARN TO CONTROL Hい I. INTRODUCTION upon certain aspects a review of the evidence bearing paper I propose to present by H' D' 7futhis This topic was first dealt with ur,d Mesolithic t"tft*togy in lndia' Llof Palaeolithi.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity from African Naissance to Coming Millennia” Arises out of the World’S First G
    copertina2 12-12-2000 12:55 Seite 1 “Humanity from African Naissance to Coming Millennia” arises out of the world’s first J. A. Moggi-Cecchi Doyle G. A. Raath M. Tobias V. P. Dual Congress that was held at Sun City, South Africa, from 28th June to 4th July 1998. “Dual Congress” refers to a conjoint, integrated meeting of two international scientific Humanity associations, the International Association for the Study of Human Palaeontology - IV Congress - and the International Association of Human Biologists. As part of the Dual Congress, 18 Colloquia were arranged, comprising invited speakers on human evolu- from African Naissance tionary aspects and on the living populations. This volume includes 39 refereed papers from these 18 colloquia. The contributions have been classified in eight parts covering to Coming Millennia a wide range of topics, from Human Biology, Human Evolution (Emerging Homo, Evolving Homo, Early Modern Humans), Dating, Taxonomy and Systematics, Diet, Brain Evolution. The book offers the most recent analyses and interpretations in diff rent areas of evolutionary anthropology, and will serve well both students and specia- lists in human evolution and human biology. Editors Humanity from African Humanity Naissance from to Coming Millennia Phillip V. Tobias Phillip V. Tobias is Professor Emeritus at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, where he Michael A. Raath obtained his medical doctorate, PhD and DSc and where he served as Chair of the Department of Anatomy for 32 years. He has carried out researches on mammalian chromosomes, human biology of the peoples of Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi Southern Africa, secular trends, somatotypes, hominin evolution, the history of anatomy and anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Anthropology
    Forthcoming Current Anthropology Wenner-Gren Symposium Current Anthropology Supplementary Issues (in order of appearance) Current VOLUME 58 SUPPLEMENT 17 DECEMBER 2017 The Anthropology of Corruption. Sarah Muir and Akhil Gupta, eds. Cultures of Militarism. Catherine Besteman and Hugh Gusterson, eds. Patchy Anthropocene. Anna Tsing, Nils Bubandt, and Andrew Mathews, eds. Anthropology Previously Published Supplementary Issues Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas. Setha M. Low and Sally Engle Merry, eds. THE WENNER-GREN SYMPOSIUM SERIES Corporate Lives: New Perspectives on the Social Life of the Corporate Form. December 2017 Damani Partridge, Marina Welker, and Rebecca Hardin, eds. The Origins of Agriculture: New Data, New Ideas. T. Douglas Price and HUMAN COLONIZATION OF ASIA IN THE LATE PLEISTOCENE Ofer Bar-Yosef, eds. GUEST EDITORS: CHRISTOPHER J. BAE, KATERINA DOUKA, The Biological Anthropology of Living Human Populations: World Histories, AND MICHAEL D. PETRAGLIA National Styles, and International Networks. Susan Lindee and Ricardo Ventura Santos, eds. Human Colonization of Asia in the Late Pleistocene Human Biology and the Origins of Homo. Susan Antón and Leslie C. Aiello, eds. Human Colonization of Asia in the Late Pleistocene: The History of an Invasive Species Potentiality and Humanness: Revisiting the Anthropological Object in 58 Volume A Genomic View of the Pleistocene Population History of Asia Contemporary Biomedicine. Klaus Hoeyer and Karen-Sue Taussig, eds. Testing Modern Human Out-of-Africa Dispersal Models Using Dental Nonmetric Data Alternative Pathways to Complexity: Evolutionary Trajectories in the Middle Archaic Hominin Populations in Asia before the Arrival of Modern Humans: Their Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age. Steven L. Kuhn and Erella Hovers, eds.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Artefacts from Pakistan? Some Questions for the Excavators Hemingway, Martin F; Stapert, Dick; Dennell, R W
    University of Groningen Early Artefacts from Pakistan? Some Questions for the Excavators Hemingway, Martin F; Stapert, Dick; Dennell, R W Published in: Current Anthropology IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 1989 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Hemingway, M. F., Stapert, D., & Dennell, R. W. (1989). Early Artefacts from Pakistan? Some Questions for the Excavators. Current Anthropology, 30(3), 317-322. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 30-09-2021 Early Artefacts from Pakistan? Some Questions for the Excavators Author(s): Martin F.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Early Acheulian Evidence from South Asia by Parth R
    A review of the Early Acheulian evidence from South Asia by Parth R. Chauhan Abstract South Asia represents the easternmost geographical occurrence of typical Acheulian biface assemblages in spatial and temporal abundance. All Acheulian evidence from this region is found in a rich mosaic of diverse palaeoenvironmental, geographical, and landform contexts, highlighting the dynamic adaptive and behavioral strategies of South Asian hominins during the Pleistocene. These assemblages have been traditionally categorised as either Early or Late Acheulian, based primarily on the absence or presence of certain tool-types or evident techniques. The earliest Acheulian evidence in South Asia is represented by unique technological attributes such as the absence of the Levallois technique, a relatively low number of cleavers, and a higher presence of core-tools and choppers, when compared with the Late Acheulian. Recent excavations and associated dating efforts by investigators working in several parts of peninsular India have revealed that the Early Acheulian in South Asia may extend well beyond the Matuyama/Brunhes transition. However, the frequency of these early occurrences within the subcontinent is low, reasons for which are currently unknown. In contrast, there is a significant and marked intensification in hominin activity and land-use from the Middle Pleistocene and onwards. South Asian Acheulian tool-types are generally comparable in techno-morphology with similar assemblages known from other parts of the Old World and represent direct technological influence from Africa, where the earliest Acheulian sites are documented. This paper reviews the evidence for the Early Acheulian in South Asia and discusses the unique attributes that separate such assemblages from the Late Acheulian, generally found in younger geomorphological contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Pleistocene Sea-Crossings in the Eastern Mediterranean?
    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 42 (2016) 140–153 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anthropological Archaeology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Middle Pleistocene sea-crossings in the eastern Mediterranean? ⇑ Duncan Howitt-Marshall a, , Curtis Runnels b a British School at Athens, 52 Souedias, 106 76 Athens, Greece b Department of Archaeology, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA article info abstract Article history: Lower and Middle Palaeolithic artifacts on Greek islands separated from the mainland in the Middle and Received 11 February 2016 Upper Pleistocene may be proxy evidence for maritime activity in the eastern Mediterranean. Four Revision received 9 April 2016 hypotheses are connected with this topic. The first is the presence of archaic hominins on the islands in the Palaeolithic, and the second is that some of the islands were separated from the mainland when hominins reached them. A third hypothesis is that archaic hominin technological and cognitive capabil- Keywords: ities were sufficient for the fabrication of watercraft. Finally, the required wayfinding skills for open sea- Palaeolithic maritime activity crossings were within the purview of early humans. Our review of the archaeological, experimental, Wayfinding ethno-historical, and theoretical evidence leads us to conclude that there is no a priori reason to reject Greek islands Middle Pleistocene the first two hypotheses in the absence of more targeted archaeological surveys on the islands, and thus Human
    [Show full text]
  • Social Mirrors and the Brain: Including a Functional Imaging Study of Role
    SOCIAL MIKEGKS AND THE BBAIN including a functional imaging study of role-play and verse PhD Thesis Charles Beresford Whitehead Department of Anthropology TJniversit}' College London 2003 ProQuest Number: 10016118 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10016118 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract This thesis attempts to bridge the conceptual gulf dividing social from biological anthropology using three main lines of argument: 1. Enculturated human cooperation originated in expanded systems of kinship and reciprocity which require obfuscation of selfish bodies. Disembodied self perceptions characterize all human belief systems including the behavioural sciences. This prevents our fully appreciating that the most distinctive feature of human behaviour is a formidable armamentarium of social displays. ‘Social mirrors’ underpin human self- awareness, social intelligence, and innate altruism (the ability to identify with others). 2. Social displays engage multiple sensorimotor systems and probably account in part for our large brains. I present a study of role-play and verse, the first in a proposed programme aiming to map social mirroring functions in the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • DOI: 10.1126/Science.1200183 , 1596 (2011); 331 Science , Et Al. Shanti
    Early Pleistocene Presence of Acheulian Hominins in South India Shanti Pappu, et al. Science 331, 1596 (2011); DOI: 10.1126/science.1200183 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. If you wish to distribute this article to others, you can order high-quality copies for your colleagues, clients, or customers by clicking here. Permission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles can be obtained by following the guidelines here. The following resources related to this article are available online at www.sciencemag.org (this infomation is current as of March 24, 2011 ): Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online version of this article at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6024/1596.full.html Supporting Online Material can be found at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2011/03/22/331.6024.1596.DC1.html This article cites 22 articles, 2 of which can be accessed free: on March 24, 2011 http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6024/1596.full.html#ref-list-1 This article has been cited by 1 articles hosted by HighWire Press; see: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6024/1596.full.html#related-urls This article appears in the following subject collections: Anthropology http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/anthro www.sciencemag.org Downloaded from Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. Copyright 2011 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity from African Naissance to Coming Millennia : Colloquia In
    atti esecutivo 18-12-2000 18:04 Pagina 3 HUMANITY FROM AFRICAN NAISSANCE TO COMING MILLENNIA 3 Foreword There was an air of excitement at Sun City, South Africa, in late June of 1998, as delegates started to arrive for the Dual Congress of the International Association of Human Biologists and the International Association for the Study of Human Palaeontology. For the conference organisers, under chairmanship of Professor Phillip V. Tobias, this was the culmination of four years of hard work and planning and, as Phillip remarked at the opening ceremony, it was also a symbolic homecoming to the continent of humanity’s birth for people from all parts of the world. The delegates did indeed come from far and wide: they travelled from 70 countries and the registration list ran to 745 people, making this the most representative gathering of its kind ever held in Africa. As a venue for the exchange of new information on the biology and ancestry of humankind, the Dual Congress provided ample scope. The programme was built around 18 Colloquia, in which 95 invited papers were delivered, and 11 Open Scientific Sections, covering a wide range of topics, discussed in 103 papers, as well as in 79 poster presentations. Nor were the contributions of South African pioneers in the field forgotten: the Raymond Dart Memorial Lecture was given by Sir Walter Bodmer while Professor Tobias delivered the Robert Broom Memorial Lecture, the text of which is reproduced in this volume, together with those of 38 invited papers presented in the Colloquia of the Dual Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in Asia
    39 World Heritage papers39 World Heritage papers HEADWORLD HERITAGES 3 Human origin sites and the Human origin sites and the Heritage World in Asia Convention World Heritage Convention in Asia For more information contact: UNESCO World Heritage Centre papers 7, place Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel: 33 (0)1 45 68 24 96 Fax: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail: [email protected] http://whc.unesco.org World HeritageWorld Human origin sites and the World Heritage Convention in Asia Nuria Sanz, Editor Coordinator of the World Heritage/HEADS Programme Published in 2014 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2014 ISBN 978-92-3-100043-0 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.
    [Show full text]