DOCSLIB.ORG

AA-38 Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AA-38 Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26 AA-38 Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26 Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 06-11-2004 AA-38 Nike Site W-26 (Annapolis-Bay Bridge) Bay Head Road/Broadneck Road Anne Arundel County Annapolis, Maryland Capsule Summary The Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26 is located on Broadneck Peninsula in Annapolis, Maryland. This site was one of 21 Nike batteries established to defend the Washington­ Baltimore area during the Cold War. The Nike antiaircraft missile system was conceived to defend against bombers carrying nuclear bombs. The Nike family of missiles included the Nike-Ajax and its more powerful successor, the Nike-Hercules. · The Annapolis emplacement operated between 1955 and 1968. This site was one of several sites in the Washington-Baltimore defense area to be converted to accommodate Hercules missiles. The battery contained 30 Ajax missiles and 18 Hercules missiles after it was converted during 1960 and 1961. All missiles were removed from the Annapolis-Bay Bridge site after it was deactivated in November 1968. Three years later, the launch area of Site W-26 was acquired by the Annapolis Detachment of the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Carderock Division. The structures at the launch site, including the missile silos, currently are utilized by NSWC, Annapolis as test laboratories. However, NSWC, Annapolis is scheduled to close by the year 2000. Consequently, the subterranean missile silos will be filled with concrete (Jeff Morris, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Annapolis Detachment, personal communication, 12 November 1996). The control area currently is owned and operated by the U.S. Army Reserve Map Distribution Center. The National Register eligibility was assessed for 23 buildings and structures at Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26. Nineteen buildings and structures are located at the launch area, and four buildings are located at the control area. The resources were evaluated within their appropriate historic context by applying the National Register criteria considerations and DoD guidance for exceptional significance for resources less than 50 years of age. None of the surveyed buildings and structures at this site posses significance or those qualities of integrity necessary for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Survey No. AA-38 ''''"' '"''r\•Tr'"'1y QF • • MAR YL P. J I ; ' : ''i ' ,' :\ I Magi No. Maryland H1stoncal Trust ·.i.us•r;::-·"' ~-.'":::-::-;- =-s 1 no State Historic Sites Inventory torllt ·'" r, .. __ \llC- DOE _yes 1. Name {indicate preferred name} historic Site W-26 (Annapolis-Bay Bridge) and/or common Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26 2. Location street & number Bay Head Road __ not for publication city, town Annapolis __ vicinity of congressional district state Mary land county Anne Arundel 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use _x_ district __ public __x_ occupied __ agriculture __ museum __ building(s) __J(__ private __ unoccupied __ commercial __ park __ structure _both __ work in progress _ educational __ private residence __ site Public Acquisition Accessible __ entertainment __ religious _object __ in process __x_ yes: restricted __ government __ scientific __ being considered _yes: unrestricted __ industrial __ transportation _x_not applicable __ no _x_ military __ other: 4. Owner of Property (give names and mailing addresses of ~ owners) name U.S. Department of the Navy street & number Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Div telephone no·: N/ A city, town Bethesda state and zip code Mary 1 and 20084 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. liber street & number folio city, town state 6. Representation in Existing Historica.1 surveys title N/ A date __ federal __ state __ county __ local pository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Survey No. AA-38 Condition Check one Check one __ excellent __ deteriorated __ unaltered __ original site x_good __ ruins __ altered __ moved date of move __ fair __ unexposed Prepare both a summary paragraph and a general description of the resource and its various elements as it exists today. See Attatched Sheets. 8. Significance Survey No. AA-38 Period •lreas of Significance-Check and justify below __ prehistoric __ archeology-prehistoric __ community planning __ landscape architecture __ religion _ 1400-1499 __ archeology-historic __ conservation __ law __ science ~500-1599 __ agriculture __ economics __ literature __ sculpture - 1600-1699 __x_ architecture __ education L military __ social/ _ 1700-1799 __ art __ engineering __ music humanitarian _ 1800-1899 __ commerce __ exploration/settlement __ philosophy __ theater _x_ 1900- __ communications __ industry __ politics/government __ transportation __ invention _other (specify) Specific dates Builder/Architect check: Applicable Criteria: ~A D and/or Applicable Exception: A B C D E F G Level of Significance: x._national state local Prepare both a summary paragraph of significance and a general statement of history and support. See Attatched Sheets. 9. Major Bibliographical References Survey No. AA-38 See Attatched Sheets. 1 O. Geographical Data Acreage of nominated property 4 7 .14 AC/8 AC Quadrangle name Gibson Isl and Quadrangle scale 1 • 24, 000 UTM References do NOT complete UTM references AL.i.J I I 1 I sw I I I I I I I I I I Zone Easting Zone Easting Northing cL.LJ ~I~--- oL.i.J I I I I E L..i_J .__I....___.. _____ _ F LLI I I I G Li.J .__I............ ___ _ H LJ..j I Verbal boundary description and justification Nike site W-26 is located on Broadneck Peninsula in the vicinity of Cape St. Claire. The missile site comprises a launch area and a control area. The launch is located on Bay Head Road. Located 1.1 miles west of the launch area is the control area, which is 8r.1AV\if ~a'tti iffd ~~~i.cti&Efscfb,l)M,~~rties overlapping state or county boundaries state code county code state code county code 11. Form Prepared By name/title Lori 0. Thursby. Architectural Historian organization R. Christopher Goodwin & Assoc., Inc. date 21 February 1997 street&number 241 E. Fourth St. Ste. 100 telephone 301-694-04 28 city or town Frederick state Maryland The Maryland Historic Sites Inventory was officially created by an Act of the Maryland Legislature to be found in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Article 41, Section 181 KA, 1974 supplement. The survey and inventory are being prepared for information and record purposes only and do not constitute any infringement of individual property rights. - .,.. return to: Maryland Historical riist Shaw House lC.-. 21 State C · e Cf.;(),,:,_, - Annapo ·s, Maryland 21401 (3 269-2438 PS-2746 MHT No. AA-38 Nike Site W-26 (Annapolis-Bay Bridge) Anne Arundel County Section 7.1 Project Location and Description Summary The Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26 is located on Broadneck Peninsula in the vicinity of Cape St. Claire. The missile site comprises a launch area and a control area. The 24-ac launch area, located on Bay Head Road, contains 19 buildings and structures associated with the execution of the missile launch, including missile magazines, missile assembly and maintenance buildings, storage and fueling sheds, barracks, and sentry houses. The eight-ac control area is located approximately 1.1 mi west of the launch area, off Broadneck Road. An administration building, a barracks, a pump house, and a mess hall constitute the control area. Architectural Resources at Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26 Currently, Annapolis-Bay Bridge Nike Missile Site W-26 is comprised of 23 buildings and structures: 19 of these are at the launch area, and four are at the control area. The contracting company Drummond & Co., Inc., from Pikesville, Maryland, constructed Site W-26 in 1955 (NSWC, Annapolis, Facilities Engineers Office, Construction Drawings). The buildings and structures followed the Army's standard plans for MEC construction. The following sections provide a summary of the extant resources at the launch and control areas of Annapolis-Bay Bridge Site W-26. Included in the discussion is a description of each resource's character-defining features, physical condition, and function. Launch Area The launch area is located east of Bay Head Road and north of U.S. Route 50. Located on the west side of Bay Head Road is a 1980s residential subdivision; when the installation was constructed in 1955, it was surrounded by farms and vacant lands. The polygon-shaped 24-ac site is enclosed entirely by a wire fence that is topped with barbed wire. The installation is screened on the north, south, and east sides by tall, deciduous trees; the west side of the site is defined by Bay Head Road, which provides access to the site at two gates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rockets of the Armed Forces.Pdf
    NUIWX4)- j623.4519 Bk&ro. Bergaust l^OS'lcT; Rockets of the Armed Forces O O u- - "5« ^" CO O PUBLIC LIBRARY Fort Wayne c.r.d Allen County, Indiana 81-1 JT r PUHI I IBRAFU sno IC fflimiivN 3 1833 00476 4350 Rockets of the Armed Forces Between primitive man's rock-hurling days, and modern technology's refined rocket systems, man has come a long way in missile combat. Beginning with the principles of rocketry from early time to the present, Erik Bergaust classifies all forty-two current operational missiles into four basic categories : air-to-air ; air-to-surface ; surface- to-air; and surface-to-surface. From the Navy's highly sophisticated Polaris to the Sidewinder, widely used in Vietnam, the author pinpoints the type, propulsion, guid- ance, performance, and construction of each rocket. A picture and a short paragraph describing each rocket's military use, plus a glossary, are included. Inspection of liquid hydrogen engines. Hydro- gen is a powerful fuel and is often used in combination with liquid oxygen. Fuels are car- ried in the missile in separate tanks and are mixed in the rocket's combustion chamber where the burning takes place. / Bell ROCKETS of the ARMED FORCES By Erik Bergaust 76 6. P. Putnam's Sons New York | 80 260 4 1 ' © 1966 by Erik Bergaust All Rights Reserved Published simultaneously in the Dominion of Canada by Longmans Canada Limited, Toronto Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: AC 66-1025A PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Second Impression 1430318 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The cooperation of the Office of the Assistant Secre- tary of Defense, Magazine and Book Branch, Directorate of Information Services, made it possible to compile in this book the latest information and data on all opera- tional United States military rockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques Tiziou Space Collection
    Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Isaac Middleton and Melissa A. N. Keiser 2019 National Air and Space Museum Archives 14390 Air & Space Museum Parkway Chantilly, VA 20151 [email protected] https://airandspace.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Series : Files, (bulk 1960-2011)............................................................................... 4 Series : Photography, (bulk 1960-2011)................................................................. 25 Jacques Tiziou Space Collection NASM.2018.0078 Collection Overview Repository: National Air and Space Museum Archives Title: Jacques Tiziou Space Collection Identifier: NASM.2018.0078 Date: (bulk 1960s through
    [Show full text]
  • Desind Finding
    NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE ARCHIVES Herbert Stephen Desind Collection Accession No. 1997-0014 NASM 9A00657 National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC Brian D. Nicklas © Smithsonian Institution, 2003 NASM Archives Desind Collection 1997-0014 Herbert Stephen Desind Collection 109 Cubic Feet, 305 Boxes Biographical Note Herbert Stephen Desind was a Washington, DC area native born on January 15, 1945, raised in Silver Spring, Maryland and educated at the University of Maryland. He obtained his BA degree in Communications at Maryland in 1967, and began working in the local public schools as a science teacher. At the time of his death, in October 1992, he was a high school teacher and a freelance writer/lecturer on spaceflight. Desind also was an avid model rocketeer, specializing in using the Estes Cineroc, a model rocket with an 8mm movie camera mounted in the nose. To many members of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), he was known as “Mr. Cineroc.” His extensive requests worldwide for information and photographs of rocketry programs even led to a visit from FBI agents who asked him about the nature of his activities. Mr. Desind used the collection to support his writings in NAR publications, and his building scale model rockets for NAR competitions. Desind also used the material in the classroom, and in promoting model rocket clubs to foster an interest in spaceflight among his students. Desind entered the NASA Teacher in Space program in 1985, but it is not clear how far along his submission rose in the selection process. He was not a semi-finalist, although he had a strong application.
    [Show full text]
  • The Missile Defense Engagement Exercises of 1966 to 1968
    Looking Back Early Gaming at Lincoln Laboratory: The Missile Defense Engagement Exercises of 1966 to 1968 Researchers worked through the operational logic of a complex defense system in the early years of U.S. missile defense research. What brought Lincoln Laboratory into missile defense Laboratory to consider the technological challenges of research? The Laboratory was established in the early ballistic missile defense. 1950s to develop a continental air defense against Soviet Some of the leadership in the Department of Defense bombers carrying nuclear weapons. The architecture of thought the Army–Bell Laboratories approach to ballistic this air defense system, developed under U.S. Air Force missile defense embodied in the Nike-X system was leadership, featured a wide deployment of radars to detect unduly conservative. The technology of ballistic missiles and track attacking bombers, and fighter interceptors to was improving rapidly and the department encouraged engage and destroy the enemy aircraft. This architecture projects that were technologically more advanced than was essentially a defense of the full area of the United the Army’s Nike-X program. States and Canada. The Laboratory entered the missile defense A different architecture was favored by the U.S. domain in the early 1960s with experiments designed Army and its major development arm, the presti- to capture the physics of a missile warhead reentering gious Bell Telephone Laboratories. Their architecture, Earth’s atmosphere at hypersonic speeds. This “reentry referred to as the Nike Ajax System, featured a local- physics” effort focused on how to distinguish a real ized defense around major cities with radar sensors and warhead from a wide variety of debris from the parent guided-missile interceptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: an Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S
    This PDF is available from The National Academies Press at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13189 Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives ISBN Committee on an Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. 978-0-309-21610-4 Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives; DEPS; NRC 260 pages 6 x 9 PAPERBACK (2012) Visit the National Academies Press online and register for... Instant access to free PDF downloads of titles from the NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL 10% off print titles Custom notification of new releases in your field of interest Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Request reprint permission for this book Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives PREPUBLICATION COPY—SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION. Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives Committee on an Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities — Background and Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33153 China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities — Background and Issues for Congress Updated July 20, 2007 Ronald O’Rourke Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities — Background and Issues for Congress Summary Concern has grown in Congress and elsewhere about China’s military modernization. The topic is an increasing factor in discussions over future required U.S. Navy capabilities. The issue for Congress addressed in this report is: How should China’s military modernization be factored into decisions about U.S. Navy programs? Several elements of China’s military modernization have potential implications for future required U.S. Navy capabilities. These include theater-range ballistic missiles (TBMs), land-attack cruise missiles (LACMs), anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs), surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), land-based aircraft, submarines, surface combatants, amphibious ships, naval mines, nuclear weapons, and possibly high- power microwave (HPM) devices. China’s naval limitations or weaknesses include capabilities for operating in waters more distant from China, joint operations, C4ISR (command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance), long-range surveillance and targeting systems, anti-air warfare (AAW), antisubmarine warfare (ASW), mine countermeasures (MCM), and logistics. Observers believe a near-term focus of China’s military modernization is to field a force that can succeed in a short-duration conflict with Taiwan and act as an anti- access force to deter U.S. intervention or delay the arrival of U.S. forces, particularly naval and air forces, in such a conflict. Some analysts speculate that China may attain (or believe that it has attained) a capable maritime anti-access force, or elements of it, by about 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Disarmament
    1. NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT §1.1 Overview §1.2 Objectives and General Strategy §1.3 Disarmament Principles §1.4 Reducing Weapons Numbers §1.5 Nuclear Doctrine §1.6 Nuclear Force Posture §1.7 Parallel Security Issues §1.8 Mobilizing Political Will §1.1 Overview 1.1 As the world in 2012 marked fifty years since the Cuban missile crisis, there were still almost 18,000 nuclear warheads distributed among nine nuclear-armed states. About 94 per cent of these are in Russian and US arsenals. There are many fewer nuclear weapons today than during the Cold War, and the risk of a deliberate nuclear war being started between the United States and Russia may well be negligible. Yet, paradoxically, the overall risks of nuclear war have grown – as more countries in more unstable regions have acquired these deadly weapons, terrorists continue to seek them, and as command “limited”and control regional systems nuclear in evenwar wouldthe most have sophisticatedcatastrophic global nuclear-armed consequences. states remain vulnerable not only to system and human error but, increasingly, to cyber attack. Even a 1.2 While the need for total nuclear disarmament is more urgent than ever, its achievement remains little or no closer, both among the nuclear-weapon states (NWS) as defined in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), viz. China, beenFrance, some Russia, small the progress United Kingdom in reducing and thethe overallUnited States,US and and Russian the other nuclear four weaponsnuclear- armed states outside the NPT, viz. India, Israel, Pakistan and North Korea. There has stockpiles and the number of deployed strategic weapons, and in improving transparency among some NWS.
    [Show full text]
  • DISEC Ballistic Missiles
    ATSMUN 2018 Forum: Disarmament and International Security Committee Topic: The Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Student Officer: Thomas Antoniou Position: Chair ! ! Page !1 ATSMUN 2018 The Intercontinental Ballistic Missile An intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a guided ballistic missile with a minimum range of 5,500 kilometres (3,400 mi) primarily designed for nuclear weapons delivery (delivering one or more thermonuclear warheads). Similarly, conventional, chemical, and biological weapons can also be delivered with varying effectiveness, but have never been deployed on ICBMs. Most modern designs support multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), allowing a single missile to carry several warheads, each of which can strike a different target. Early ICBMs had limited precision, which made them suitable for use only against the largest targets, such as cities. They were seen as a “safe” basing option, one that would keep the deterrent force close to home where it would be difficult to attack. Attacks against military targets (especially hardened ones) still demanded the use of a more precise manned bomber. Second- and third-generation designs (such as the LGM-118 Peacekeeper) dramatically improved accuracy to the point where even the smallest point targets can be successfully attacked. ICBMs are differentiated by having greater range and speed than other ballistic missiles: intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs), medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs), short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs) and tactical ballistic missiles (TBMs). Short and medium-range ballistic missiles are known collectively as theatre ballistic missiles. The history of the ICBM ! Throughout history several states have attempted to develop nuclear weapons with ballistic capabilities. After the first use of nuclear weapons in 1945 many test were conducted to significantly expand the knowledge about nuclear weapons and their capabilities, The graph above shows all the test conducted by all states with successful nuclear development programs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Arms Race December 1987
    The Nuclear Arms Race In Facts And Figures December 1987 I Natural Resources Defense Council 1350 New York Avenue. NW Washington. DC 20005 2027837800 I;;~:_1 '~~~~":'i• y ~. • A ~t0 J E C T OF THE N ROC NUCLEAR W E A P 0 N SO A T A 8 0 0 K This book is a set of tables summarizing the nuclear weapons arsenals of the world. It has been prepared by the authors of the Nuclear Weapons Databook series. In preparing the Databook series we have continually updated and revised our statistical data. The following tables are the product of this effort specially produced for the December Summit between President Reagan and General secretary Gorbachev. We have decided to make these data more Widely available because of the many requests, their value to other researchers, and because we are constantly seeking revisions from our readers. We have chosen a loose-leaf format to facilitate periodic revisions and to permit the user to add additional tables and figures. Detailed information about nuclear weapons is controlled by the respective governments on the basis of "national security." The following tables represent our best estimates based on a comprehensive analysis of the open literature. We believe they are the most accurate data of their kind in the open literature. We recognize, nonetheless, that these estimates can be improved, particularly regarding the nuclear arsenals of the Soviet Union and other non-u.S countries. we urge the user to alert us to any errors and to new sources of data. We would also appreciate hearing from you regarding what other tables and alternative formats would be most useful~ Thomas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Missile Defense 2020
    COVER PHOTO MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY APRIL 2017 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 202 887 0200 | www.csis.org Missile Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 Defense 301 459 3366 | www.rowman.com 2020 Next Steps for Defending the Homeland PRINCIPAL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR THOMAS KARAKO WES RUMBAUGH IAN WILLIAMS A REPORT OF THE CSIS MISSILE DEFENSE PROJECT ISBN 978-1-4422-7989-6 Ë|xHSLEOCy279896z v*:+:!:+:! APRIL 2017 Missile Defense 2020 Next Steps for Defending the Homeland PRINCIPAL AUTHORS CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR Thomas Karako Wes Rumbaugh Ian Williams A REPORT OF THE CSIS MISSILE DEFENSE PROJ ECT Lanham • Boulder • New York • London About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organ ization headquartered in Washington, DC. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analy sis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveling the Playing Field Reintroducing U.S
    LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD REINTRODUCING U.S. THEATER-RANGE MISSILES IN A POST-INF WORLD JACOB COHN TIMOTHY A. WALTON ADAM LEMON TOSHI YOSHIHARA LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD REINTRODUCING U.S. THEATER-RANGE MISSILES IN A POST-INF WORLD JACOB COHN TIMOTHY A. WALTON ADAM LEMON TOSHI YOSHIHARA 2019 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2019 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Jacob Cohn is a Research Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. His research focuses on the intersection of strategy, operational concept development, and resources. He also focuses on the utilization of scenarios and wargames to facilitate the exploration of long- term competitions and force planning. Mr. Cohn has authored a number of publications on trends in the defense budget and defense acquisitions as well as case studies exploring the Second Nuclear Age and defending European frontline states. He contributes to print and broadcast media and is also an adjunct lecturer at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. Timothy A. Walton is a Research Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Mr. Walton focuses his research and analysis on the development of new operational concepts and the assessment of trends in future warfare and Asia-Pacific security dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Nine Army Nuclear Weapons
    9 Army Nuclear Weapons Chapter Nine Army Nuclear Weapons The Army1 uses a wide variety of nuclear weapon sys- ish, Dutch, Italian, and West German armies. LANCE tems-medium range PERSHING la and short-range replaced HONEST JOHN in all of these countries, more LANCE surface-to-surface missiles, NIKE-HERCULES than doubling the range and accuracy over the older surface-to-air missiles, 155mm and 8-inch (203mm) artil- missile, and providing greater mobility and reliability. lery, and atomic demolition munitions (nuclear land A new warhead for the LANCE, an enhanced radiation mines). The HONEST JOHN surface-to-surface rocket, version of the W70 (Mod 3) produced in 1981-1983, is although withdrawn from active U.S. use, is nuclear being stored in the U.S. and awaits shipment to armed with some NATO allies. Army nuclear weapons Europe. The HONEST JOHN short-range free-flight are deployed with U.S. combat units throughout the rocket, first deployed in 1954, remains deployed with United States, Europe, in South Korea, and among allied W31 nuclear warheads in the Greek and Turkish military forces. They vary in range from manually armies. No plans are currently known for the replace- emplaced land mines to 460 miles, and in yield from sub ment of HONEST JOHN in the above forces with the (0.01) to 400 kilotons. LANCE, but they will be obsolete in the late 1980s and The PERSHING la is the longest range and highest impossible to support. A nuclear armed LANCE yield Army nuclear weapon currently deployed. One replacement is under development, called the Corps hundred and eighty launchers, with more than 300 mis- Support Weapon System, as part of the Army-Air Force siles, all armed with W50 nuclear warheads, are Joint Tactical Missile System program to investigate deployed in West Germany with the U.S.
    [Show full text]