Resin and Wax Holdings Ltd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resin and Wax Holdings Ltd RESIN AND WAX HOLDINGS LTD Resin and Wax Holdings Ltd Peat Extraction and Processing Project Resource Consent Application September 2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INTRODUCTION 3 RESOURCE CONSENTS REQUESTED 4 SITE DESCRIPTION 4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 16 CONSULTATION 33 DISTRICT & REGIONAL PLAN ASSESSMENT 35 ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 42 SUMMARY 48 2 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of this Document This document comprises an application by Resin and Wax Holdings Limited (RWHL) to Far North District Council (FNDC) and Northland Regional Council (NRC) for grant of resource consents to extract and process Kauri peat in Far North for recovery of natural waxes and resin. 1.2 Background Resin and Wax Holdings Ltd (RWHL) is a New Zealand company planning to establish extraction and processing operation at Kaimaumau for recovering resin and wax product from kauri peat. The peat harvesting will be from several farmland sites in Far North. The processing plant will be located on land owned by the local Iwi Te Runanga o Ngai Takoto (Ngai Takoto)at Kaimaumau. RWHL have agreements with the farm owners and Ngai Takoto (at their Sweetwater property) for access to the resource. Ngai Takoto has agreed to provide land for the process plant at Kaimaumau property as part of their strategy to reclaim and derive income from their unproductive Kaimaumau land. The resin and wax project is seen integral to the Iwi’s plan to develop their land and has their full support. The project has significant economic benefits for the region. It will generate $60 million in export earnings when fully implemented and will provide full-time employment to 50 people of which 80%+ will be local hire. In addition, the iwi has plans for a housing development to accommodate construction and operating labour and future workers for their Kaimaumau development plans. A summary of the RWHL proposal is attached in Appendix A. The RWHL operation involves excavating the peat areas, solvent extracting the crude waxes and resins and refining them into finished products for shipment to export markets. The operation has three key elements. i. the extraction of wet peat from the farmlands ii. the processing of peat to recover the natural waxes and resin iii. the return and restoration of spent peat to the same area from where it was extracted. Parts of the NT Kaimaumau property has been used in the past for a similar resin and wax extraction operations (Kaurex 1985). More recently parts have been cleared for kauri log extraction and other farming projects (Sovereign 2009). Over recent years large areas have also been affected by weed and exotic plant infestation including the spread of Sydney Golden Wattle. The other farms are individually owned and in close vicinity to the Kaimaumau plant site. Some of these are in productive use mainly for dry stock whilst some are underdeveloped but being repurposed for agriculture/horticulture purposes. 3 2 RESOURCE CONSENTS REQUESTED RWHL is seeking the following consents from Far North District Council (FNDC) and NRC (Northland Regional Council) to implement this project. Far North District Council . Land use consent for carrying out the proposed activities inclusive of earthworks, vegetation clearance, land drainage, storage and use of solvents, noise emission, and site access, in terms of the District Plan rules on these matters and Section 9 of the RMA. Northland Regional Council . Land use consent for vegetation clearance, land drainage and earthworks pursuant to the Regional Water & Soil Plan and Section 9 of the RMA; . Discharge consent to divert and discharge surface water from draining of the peatlands using existing drains to the lower Waiparera Creek and onto Rangaunu Harbour . Discharge permit for the discharge to ground of treated wastewater from ablution and kitchen facilities associated with the processing plant, in terms of the Regional Water & Soil Plan rules and Section 15 of the RMA; . Discharge permit for the discharge to ground of treated stormwater from outdoor storage, vehicle parking and other impermeable surfaces, in terms of the Regional Water & Soil Plan rules on this matter and Section 15 of the RMA; and . Discharge permit for the discharge to air of contaminants from the processing plant, pursuant to rules of the Regional Water & Soil Plan and Section 15 of the RMA. The completed application form is attached herewith this document. 3 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 The Sites The extent and nature of peat resource on the various sites including the NT Sweetwater property, currently in productive farmland and in proximity to the NT Kaimaumau site, are identified in the RWHL Project Overview Report and the Soil & Rock Assessment of Potential Peat Resources together appended as Appendix B. They are also explained in the RWHL Peat Excavation Management Plan in Appendix C. A Quickmap of the target properties (peat sites) is contained in Appendix D. Figure 1 shows the resource potential of the peat deposits in Far North while Figure 2a and 2b show the target farms for peat extraction in the Kaimaumau and Sweetwater areas. The NgaiTakoto farm is the largest site at Sweetwater and is shown in Figure 2c. Details on all the target sites is provided in Table 1. 4 Figure 1 –Potential Peat Resources – Pukenui to Awanui Source: Soil and Rock Report 5 Figure 2a – Target Peat Extraction Sites Kaimaumau Figure 2b – Target Peat Extraction Sites Sweetwater 6 Figure 2c – Ngai Takoto property at Sweetwater for peat extraction (Northern Block Dairy 3) 7 Table 1 – Peat Extraction Sites Kaimaumau And Sweetwater (Excludes NT Kaimaumau Peat land) No. Farm Legal Description Total Ha Peat Ha Peat Depth m Zoning 1 Honey Tree Farms Lot 2 DP 497050 Section 53 SO 55920 84 15 3 Rural Prod Section 55 SO 55920 Section 54 SO 55920 2 Petricevich Section 40 SO 36657 Section 18 SO 24801 Lot 2 DP 413761 70 45 3 Rural Prod Lot 2 DP 379754 Section 71 Blk 5 Opoe SD SO27091 3 Oretere Farms Ltd Lot 1 DP 120253 Section 51 SO22981 Section 96 SO29891 Lot 2 DP 120233 Lot 2 DP 379754 172 50-80 2 Rural Prod Lot 1 DP 405064 Lot 2 DP 405064 Section 30 Blk III Opoe SD 4 Jeremy White Section 50 SO 53927 Section 41 SO 37299 Pt Section 42 SO 335329 106 50 2-4.8 Rural Prod Lot 2 DP 336507 Lot 2 DP 198540 5 J R Jones Lot 1 DP 105102 88 30 2-3 Rural Prod Lot 2 DP 105102 6 Wayne Bratton Lot 1 DP 38694 32 20 3 Rural Prod 7 Bob/Kevin Campbell Lot 2 DP184379 Lot 1 DP 193585 Lot 2 DP196114 150 60 1.5 Rural Prod Lot 1 DP40152 Lot 3 DP 40152 Lot 1 DP 497050 8 Elbury Holdings Ltd Lot 1 DP 22761 340 Joe, Fionna, Logan King Lot 2 DP 13971 (200 Rural Prod Pt Section 26 SO 28799 K'maumau, 30-50 2 & Gen Lot 1 DP193586 140 Coastal Lot 1 DP 184379 Sweetwater) 9 Iwi - Ngai Takoto/ Te Rarawa Lot 2 2500 300 3 Rural Prod Sweetwater Farms DP 365143 8 Honey Tree Farms Ltd adjoins the NT property on the western side. Honey Tree Farms is a 16 ha block within 1 km of the process plant and accessible by existing vehicle tracks. It is zoned for rural production. Honey Tree are re-purposing and developing their land for an Avocado Orchard and have applied to NRC for water rights which has been granted. Drainage is through the Kaurex main drain which runs through the NT property to Waiparera Stream and in turn the Rangaunu Harbour. Figure 3a : Honey Tree Farm Petervich Farms (total 70 ha) is 2-3 kms from Processing Plant. 45 ha is suitable for peat extraction.The property borders Honey Tree Farms and in close proximity to NT Kaimaumau block. Figure 3b : Petricevich Farm 9 Oretere Farm contains 50 hectares of peat deposit within 1 km of the proposed process plant. Road access is already in place on a cooperative basis. Farm drains are also in place which can be easily upgraded to drain the block. Figure 3c –Oretere Farm Jeremy White Farm has three farms totalling 106 ha. The peat deposit of interest is in the northern farm totalling 50 ha and is partly undeveloped. Road access may require upgrading for peat movement. Peat deposit 2-4.8m deep. Figure 3d –Jeremy White Farm The Elbury holdings peat deposit is in swampy paddocks on the western and southern side of the property. There are eight 4 hectares paddocks with 2m deep peat deposit. The balance of the 10 property is very shallow with a high sand pan. The land has a gradual fall towards the harbour. Feasibility of establishing drains being investigated. Raceways will be developed in some areas for truck movement. The property is being farmed in some areas while some parts are undeveloped. Figure 3e – Elbury Holdings Ltd The Campbell property has shallower peat deposit over a 50 hectares area and lies on the other side of the main highway going north. Peat depth is estimated at 2 m. Feasibility of drains and is being investigated. Raceways in place. Figure 3f – Campbell Property 11 Wayne Bratton and JR Jones Farms are located in the Sweetwater area . The Bratton farm has peat areas close to the lake which is not used for productive/farming purposes.Kauri logs has been removed from this area in past. The Jones farm (88 ha) has approximately 30 ha of peat deposit suitable for extraction. Figure 4a – Wayne Bratton and JR Jones Farms Sweetwater Ngai Takoto Northern Block Dairy 3 is 999 ha block out of total 2454 ha Sweetwater Station jointly owned by Ngai Takoto and Te Rarawa .
Recommended publications
  • Wood Waste As a Raw Material Lionel K
    Volume 18 Article 3 1-1-1930 Wood Waste as a Raw Material Lionel K. Arnold Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/amesforester Part of the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Arnold, Lionel K. (1930) "Wood Waste as a Raw Material," Ames Forester: Vol. 18 , Article 3. Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/amesforester/vol18/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ames Forester by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE AMES FORESTER 17 Wood Waste as a Raw Material Lionel K. Arnold, Engineering Experiment Station It is estimated that the annual sawdust pile of the world would be several times as large as the largest skyscraper of New 'York. The sawclust is only about one-fifth of the total waste from the lumber industry. It is estimated that 62 per cent of each tree cut for lumber is wasted. This includes the limbs, top, and stump as well as the waste at the mill. From the sawlogs alone the waste is approximately 49 per cent. Unbreakable dolls and dynamite are only two of the many products made fl-om wood flour which is made from sawdust and other wood wastes. In spite of the immense quantities of sawdust and other wood wastes produced in the United States, we are importing in the neighborhood of 12 million pounds of wood flour every year at a cost of about 90 thousand dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Phytophthora Clade 5 Including Two New Species, Phytophthora Agathidicida and P
    Phytotaxa 205 (1): 021–038 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.205.1.2 A taxonomic revision of Phytophthora Clade 5 including two new species, Phytophthora agathidicida and P. cocois BEVAN S. WEIR1, ELSA P. PADERES1, NITISH ANAND1, JANICE Y. UCHIDA2, SHAUN R. PENNYCOOK1, STANLEY E. BELLGARD1 & ROSS E. BEEVER1 1 Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Corresponding author; [email protected] 2 University of Hawaii at Manoa, Hawaii, United States of America Abstract Phytophthora Clade 5 is a very poorly studied group of species of oomycete chromists, consisting of only two known species P. castaneae (≡ P. katsurae, nom. illegit.) and P. heveae with most isolates from East Asia and the Pacific Islands. However, isolates of two important disease-causing chromists in Clade 5, one of kauri (Agathis australis) in New Zealand, the other of coconut (Cocos nucifera) in Hawaii, poorly match the current species descriptions. To verify whether these isolates belong to separate species a detailed morphological study and phylogenetic analysis consisting of eight genetic loci was conducted. On the basis of genetic and morphological differences and host specificity, we present the formal description of two new species in Clade 5, Phytophthora agathidicida sp. nov. and Phytophthora cocois sp. nov. To clarify the typification of the other Clade 5 species, an authentic ex-holotype culture of Phytophthora castaneae is designated and P. heveae is lectotypified and epitypified. Key words: nomenclature, oomycete, phylogeny, species description Introduction Phytophthora species are important oomycete chromists (Oomycetes, Peronosporales, Pythiaceae) plant pathogens causing significant disease (Kroon et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Agathis Robusta and Agathis Australis Friends Friends
    Plants in Focus, December 2016 Agathis robusta and Agathis australis Friends of GeelongBotanic Left: The Qld Kauri Agathis robusta, planted in the Albury BG in 1910, is the largest recorded in the Big Tree Register. Note gardener. [1] Right: The NZ Kauri Agathis australis, named Tane Mahuta (Lord of the Forest), in the Waipoua Forest is the largest known in NZ. Photo: Prof. Chen Hualin, CC BY-SA 4.0, zh.wikipedia.org Kauris (Agathis sp.) are conifers Conifers, along with the other Gymnosperms (Cycads and Ginkgoes), first appeared about 300 Ma (Million years ago) at the end of the Carboniferous when the world’s coal deposits were being laid down with the remains of the spore-producing trees of that period. The early conifers looked like modern Araucaria. These trees spread throughout the world and displaced their predecessors. The age of the seed plants had arrived. The conifers are a hardy lot. They survived the largest mass extinction the earth has known, 252 Ma, at the end of the Permian Period. But more challenges lay ahead. Sometime in the next 50 Myr (Million years) one of Gymnosperms gave rise to the flowering plants, the Angiosperms. By 100 Ma, in the Cretaceous period, Angiosperms were widespread. And so the battle began - and still continues to this day. The flowering plants have many features that make them more successful in many environments, so their take-over of many habitats was complete by about 65 Ma at the end of the age of the dinosaurs. But in the world’s harsh environments the conifers continue to not just survive, but flourish.
    [Show full text]
  • Components and Types of Varnishes
    Components and types of Varnishes Varnish is traditionally a combination of a drying oil, a resin, and a thinner or solvent. However, different types of varnish have different components. After being applied, the film-forming substances in varnishes either harden directly, as soon as the solvent has fully evaporated, or harden after evaporation of the solvent through curing processes, primarily chemical reaction between oils and oxygen from the air (autoxidation) and chemical reactions between components of the varnish. Resin varnishes "dry" by evaporation of the solvent and harden almost immediately upon drying. Acrylic and waterborne varnishes "dry" upon evaporation of the water but will experience an extended curing period. Oil, polyurethane, and epoxy varnishes remain liquid even after evaporation of the solvent but quickly begin to cure, undergoing successive stages from liquid or syrupy, to tacky or sticky, to dry gummy, to "dry to the touch", to hard. Environmental factors such as heat and humidity play a very large role in the drying and curing times of varnishes. In classic varnish the cure rate depends on the type of oil used and, to some extent, on the ratio of oil to resin. The drying and curing time of all varnishes may be sped up by exposure to an energy source such as sunlight, ultraviolet light, or heat. Drying oil There are many different types of drying oils, including linseed oil, tung oil, and walnut oil. These contain high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Drying oils cure through an exothermic reaction between the polyunsaturated portion of the oil and oxygen from the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Kauri Tree Gum /Resin: 1840-1950
    ~ 0 ~ KAIHU THE DISTRICT NORTH RIPIRO WEST COAST SOUTH HOKIANGA HISTORY AND LEGEND REFERENCE JOURNAL NINE RICHES FROM THE HILLS VALLEYS AND SWAMPS 1780-1900 PART ONE KAURI TREE GUM /RESIN: 1840-1950 PART TWO TIMBER BONANZA ~ 1 ~ CHAPTERS PART ONE PART TWO CHAPTER ONE TIMBER BONANZA GUM/RESIN FROM THE KAURI PAGE 107 PAGE 3 CHAPTER TWO CHAPTER ONE THE GUM FIELDS SAD DEMISE OF THE MIGHTY KAURI PAGE 8 FORESTS PAGE 108 CHAPTER THREE THE KAURI GUM DIGGERS CHAPTER TWO PAGE 26 HARVESTING TIMBER PAGE 112 CHAPTER FOUR CHARACTERS OF THE GUM FIELDS CHAPTER THREE PAGE 53 TIMBER MILLING: HOKIANGA AND KAIPARA HARBOUR’S CHAPTER FIVE PAGE 119 NEWS OF THE DAY: GUM INDUSTRY PAGE 72 CHAPTER FOUR 1888: KAURI TIMBER COMPANY CHAPTER SIX PAGE 177 THE 1898 KAURI-GUM INDUSTRY COMMISSION SOURCES/BIBLIOGRAPHY PAGE 78 PAGE 213 CHAPTER SEVEN GUM EXTRACTION PLANTS PAGE 96 ~ 2 ~ Note: Please remember that Kaihu or Whapu is the name given to the area at the mouth of the Kaihu River now known as Dargaville. Opanaki was the name of the area known as Kaihu today. The change was made towards the end of the nineteenth century. ~ 3 ~ PART ONE 1 GUM/RESIN FROM THE KAURI TREE WHY DID THOSE GIANTS OF THE FOREST DISAPPEAR? Tens of thousands of years ago, giant Kauri trees (Agathis Australis) formed vast forests over much of Northland. Before the Europeans arrived and begun to cut down the existing Kauri for timber, a lot of these great forests had disappeared, probably due to changing forces of nature and climate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Management of Kauri Forests :A Historical Review of Government Policy and a Proposal for the Future
    THE MANAGEMENT OF KAURI FORESTS :A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT POLICY AND A PROPOSAL FOR THE FUTURE Abstract The his tor^^ of government and naiioizal attitudes toward kauri forestry in New Zealand from the early 19th century to the prtsent is examined. The most seviour shortcomings have been the inability to recognize that kauri management may have a place in New Zealand forest pruclice, and the stopgo attitude toward research which has held back any real pro- gress. The Government's "New Kauri Policy" is discussed and sug- gestions made for its better implementation. INTRODUCTION In the Direct01 of Forests' report of 1960 (A.J.H.R., p 18) we read: "No national activity in the whole history of New Zealand has received so much lip service as indigcnous forestry. ." This paper is an attempt to review government policy on kauri management. It begins when kauri was king and sup- suplied most of the timber for the infant colony. At that timc there was so much timber that no one ever thought it would run out. However, a little over one hundred years ago the first notes of cautioln were sounde~d,although it tooik fifty years more before much notice was taken and by then it was almost too late for the indigenous forests of New Zealand. Even when the Forest Service was set up in 1919 and commenced a definite policy of forest protection the attitude toward the indigenous forest had a curious ambivalence. On one hand, it was thought that the native forests could not be managed and were thus not worth considering on economic grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Wood Forest Products from Conifers
    NO\ -WOOD FOREST PROaCTS 12 Non-wood forest products from conifers Food and Agriculture Organizahon of the United Nations NO \--WOOD FOREST PRODUCTS 12 Non-wood forest products from conifers by William M. Ciesla European Forest Institute FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1998 Reprinted 2001 This paper discusses both traditional and contemporary uses of products from conifers. This material is presented for information only and does not imply endorsement by the author or by FAO. Some of those products have medicinal purposes; however, they should only be used under the care and guidance of a qualified physician. Transport of certain non-wood forest products (e.g. foliage, Christmas trees, seeds and landscape or ornamental plants) across international boundaries poses a risk of accidental transport and introduction of insects, fungi or other potentially destructive agents.Itis recommended that anyone planning to move plant materials across international boundaries check with appropriate authorities in the country from which the products are to be exported and the countries into which the products are to be imported for import permit requirements or restrictions which might apply. Movement of non-wood forest products across international boundaries may be subject to trade restrictions (both tariff and non-tariff). Appropriate authorities should be contacted prior to planned movement of any non-wood forest products across international boundaries. A review of trade restrictions affecting international trade in non-wood forest products may be found in Non-Wood Forest Products No. 8, 1995. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Kauri Care Guide About This Booklet This Booklet Is for Landowners, Managers and Occupiers with Kauri on Their Land
    kauri care guide About this booklet This booklet is for landowners, managers and occupiers with kauri on their land. It explains the ecology of kauri, common diseases and gives advice about care and propagation. This booklet has three main sections: 1. Kauri ecology We describe the kauri family, how kauri grow and reproduce, and diseases that affect these trees. 2. How to care for your kauri We give advice on how to reduce stress and care for your kauri. 3. How to grow kauri We describe how to gather seed, propagate and plant out kauri. A glossary of terms used and list of further reading is also included. Acknowledgements Compiled by Stacey Hill, Biosecurity, Auckland Council. Content provided by Auckland Council: Nick Waipara, Plant Pathologist, Biosecurity; Amanda Peart, Communications Advisor, Biosecurity; Brendan Mackie, Horticulturist/ Ranger; Damon Keen, Creative Direction Advisor; Auckland Council Natural Heritage Team; Auckland Council Biosecurity Team. Thanks also to: Ian Barton, Forestry and Environmental Consultant; Ian Horner, Plant Pathologist, Plant and Food Research and John Hogan, Three Streams Reserve. ISBN No: 978-1-98-857134-8 (print) ISBN No: 978-1-98-857133-1 (online) Disclaimer While every effort has been made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, the Kauri Dieback Programme does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Any view or opinion expressed
    [Show full text]
  • IELTS Exam Training Courses GT Reading Test 10 Section 3 KAURI GUM - a Piece of New Zealand’S History
    IELTS Exam Training Courses GT Reading Test 10 Section 3 KAURI GUM - a piece of New Zealand’s history A The kauri tree is a massive forest tree native to New Zealand. Kauri once formed vast forests over much of the north of the country. Whereas now it is the wood of the kauri which is an important natural resource, in the past it was the tree’s sap (the thick liquid which flows inside a tree) which, when hardened into gum, played an important role in New Zealand’s early history. After running from rips or tears in the bark of trees, the sap hardens to form the lumps of gum which eventually fall to the ground and are buried under layers of forest litter. The bark often splits where branches fork from the trunk, and gum accumulates there also. The early European settlers in New Zealand collected and sold the gum. Gum fresh from the tree was soft and of low value but most of the gum which was harvested had been buried for thousands of years. This gum came in a bewildering variety of colours, degree of transparency and hardness, depending on the length and location of burial, as well as the health of the original tree and the area of the bleeding. Highest quality gum was hard and bright and was usually found at shallow depth on the hills. Lowest quality gum was soft, black or chalky and sugary and was usually found buried in swamps, where it had been in contact with water for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Kauri: Ecology, Establishment, Growth and Management
    DISCLAIMER In producing Ibis Bulle/in reasonable care has been laken to ensure that all slatements represent lhe best information auai!ahle. However, the contents of this pu.bUcalion are not intended to be a substitute for specific specialist advice on any matter and should not be relied on for Ihat purpose. NHWZEALANDFORESTRESEARCHTNSllTUTEUMflWand ils employees shall not be liable on any ground.for any loss, damage, or liability incurred as a direct or indirec/ result of any reliance by any person upon information contained or opinions expressed in Ibis work. To obtain further copies of this publication, or for information about Forest Research publications, please contact: Publications Officer Forest Research Private Bag 3020 Rotorua New Zealand telephone: +64 7 343 5899 facsimile: +64 7 348 0952 e-mail: [email protected] website: www .forestresearch.co.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data Bergin, D. 0. Kauri : ecology, establishment, growth, and management I David Bergin and Greg S£eward. (New Zealand ind igenous tree bulletin) lncludes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-478-11012-X 1. Kauri-New Zealand. 2. Forest management-New Zealand. 1. Steward, G. A. (Gregory Alan), 1958- II. New Zealand Forest Research Institute. III. Title. TV. Series. 585.3--dc 22 Production Team jonathan BatTan - photography Teresa McConchie - layout design Ruth Gadgil - technical editing judy Griffith- editing and layout ISSN 1176-2632 ISBN 0-478-11012-X ©New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited 2004 Front cover insert: Spreading large crowns of mature kauri, Waipoua Forest Sanctuaty, Northland. Back cover: Interior of St Andrews Church, Cambridge, built of kauri in 1881.
    [Show full text]
  • Merry Christmas! Meri Kirihimete!
    KauriKonnect23 FROM THE CHAIR Merry Christmas! Meri Kirihimete! We wish you, your whānau and your work colleagues all the very On behalf of the Programme Leadership Team I wish you all a safe best for the festive season. May it be full of good times with family and relaxing Christmas and New Year. In addition, on a personal and friends...and a chance to rest up after another very busy year. note I would like to thank all of the passionate people within the Please remember it’s the season for giving rather than taking... partnership organisations and communities for what you have so if you’re in the kauri forest this summer, please GIVE our done this year. You have gone above and beyond to mobilise kauri every chance of survival by NOT TAKING any soil in or out forest users to adopt kauri-safe behaviours and to advance our when you visit. Make sure soil is removed from shoes, equipment knowledge of the kauri dieback disease. and vehicles before they go in and the same before you leave. In my relatively short time with the Programme I have been We want our magnificent taonga to be around for many more overwhelmed by the dedicated work of scientists, field staff, Christmases to come! community liaison staff and all the unpaid volunteers. It is also We look forward to your continued support in the New Year to interesting to note how people have found a way to keep contributing encourage all forest users and communities to do everything they to the Programme despite changes in employment, retirement and can to stop the spread of kauri dieback disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Paint and Varnish Facts and Formulae
    Paint and Varnish Facts and Formulae BY J. N. HOFF A Hand Book for the Maker, Dealer and User of Paints and Varnishes Published by Central Publishing Company Newark, New Jersey New York D. Van Nostrand and Company 23 Murray and 27 Warren Streets 1905 Copyright 1904 BY LEMUEL B. OSBORNE. THE GETTY CENTER LIBRARY INDEX. A Acid Acetic 6-61 " Sulphurous 84 Adulterations 26-31-35-50 Alcohol, Grain 60 " Wood 61 Alkalies, Action of 85 ' ' to remove paint 152 Aluminum Bronze 79 Leaf 112 Amyl Acetate 61 Ammonia 151 Aniline Colors 39-142-162 Anti-fouling Paints 34 Asphaltum 66-146 B Banana Liquid 102 Barium Chromate 32 Bathtub Enamel 116 Bathtubs, to Enamel 117 Benzines 59 Berlin Blue 36 Black Boards, Coating for 141 Blacks 27-28 " Charcoal or Soot 27-28 " Ivory or Bone 27-28 Black Enamel 116 Blistering 89 Blooming 87 Blue, Celestial 37 " Chinese 36 " Cobalt 37 -3 G G3£ Blue, Indigo 37 ' ' Prussian 36 ' ' Ultramarine 35 Boiled Oil 50 " Artificial 171 Bottle Greens 35 British Gum 80 Bronze Greens 35 Bronzing Liquids 102-103 Bronzes 79 " How Made 79 ' ' Imported 79 Brushes, Paint 155-156 C Cadmium Yellow 32 Calcium Carbonate 21 Oxide 21 Sulphate 20 Calcutta Linseed Oil 52 Camphor Oil 175 Carbon 27 Carmine 39-95 Caseine 77-105 Cements 105-106 Paints 77 ' ' Priming 94 Castor Oil 131 Ceilings 99 ' ' to take spots from 154 Celestial Blue 37 Cements, Pastes and Putties 103 to 106 for Steam Pipes 103 ' ' for Metal and Porcelain 104 for Metal Letters on Glass 104 ' ' Quick Drying for Iron 104 Stone and Glass 104 Caseine 105 to Unite Glass and Metal 105
    [Show full text]