DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Cheshire East Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Cheshire East Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Cheshire East Council electoral review This PDF contains 33 submissions by local residents A-B Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page please scroll through the document. Eleanor Gregory From: Reviews@ Sent: 13 February 2010 17:43 To: Reviews@ Subject: EC website: Online submission Form summary: Name : M Akerman Postal address : Email address : Area your submission refers to : Cheshire East Organisation you belong to : member of the public Your feedback : Please note, as a Resident of Adlington I want Adlington to remain part of Prestbury Ward. It should not be transferred to Poynton (East or West) merely for the administrative convenience of local Government or to equalise the number of electors per Councillors. ( two of your "Main Considerations" in forming the draft proposals). The "third" main consideration namely community identity seems to be completely ignored, yet it is the principal consideration that matters to Adlington communuity. Attachment : No file uploaded Form Information Site Name : Electoral Commission Site Id : 42 Page Standard Name : Consultations and current reviews Page Standard Id : 42911 Page Custom Form Name : Online submissions Page Custom Form Id : 55756 Url : http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/boundary-reviews/open-consultations/online- submissions Submission Id : 84593 Time of Submission : 13 Feb 2010 5:42 pm Submission IP Address : 213.129.83.5 1 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: William Morrison Sent: 12 February 2010 16:06 To: Richard Buck Subject: FW: Electoral review of Cheshire East Authority From: Pete & Barbara Allen Sent: 12 February 2010 11:30 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral review of Cheshire East Authority Good Morning As a resident of Adlington, I want Adlington to remain part of Prestbury Ward. It should not be transferred to Poynton ( East or West), merely for the administrative convenience of local Government or to equalise the number of electors per Councillor ( two of your three “main considerations” in forming the draft proposals).The third “main consideration”, namely “community identity” seems to be completely ignored, yet it is the principal consideration that matters to the Adlington community! Barbara Allen 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: Virginia Appleton Sent: 12 February 2010 20:24 To: Reviews@ Subject: Stapeley Rural(including Batherton) I would like to register my support for the reccomendation by East Cheshire that Stapeley rural (including Batherton) be included in the Wybunbury ward,as opposed to Nantwich South and Stapeley Urban. My reasons are: 1.Stapeley rural(including Batherton) is a rural area,and totally different in character to the urban /estate area of Stapeley which is being urbanised and absorbed into Nantwich. 2.The appearance and atmoshere is still rural and rural village-like,I feel it is important to maintain the historic nature of this area-it has a character much more akin to local villages such as Wybunbury. 3.The children locally attend village schools -Broad Lane and Wybunbury Delves,in keeping with the village(not urban) atmosphere. 4.The countryside atmosphere and village ambience is a valuable resource,and should be preserved for future generations. 5.I feel that if it was absorbed into Stapeley Urban,the character will gradually be gradually destroyed,much to the detriment of Nantwich as a whole.It would be a real shame if the area just became bland urbanisation. Mrs V.C.Appleton, 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: William Morrison Sent: 12 February 2010 16:06 To: Richard Buck Subject: FW: Electoral Review East Cheshire - Adlington From: Anne Ashmore Sent: 12 February 2010 11:54 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review East Cheshire - Adlington Dear Sirs. Re: Proposed Warding of Adlington with Poynton West. As a resident of Adlington I am apalled by the above proposal and fully support the Parish Council in not accepting this proposal and still seeking to be warded with Prestbury. Adlington should not be transferred to Poynton (East or West) merely for the convenience of Local Government or to equalise the number of electors per Counciller. Adlington has nothing in common with Poynton which is now classed as a town. Adlington is a rural and agricultural community (which Poynton is not any more) and has far more affinity with Prestbury and surrounding villages. I feel we would lose a lot of our identity if warded with a more urban area like Poynton. Yours faithfully H A Ashmore (Mrs) 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: Andy Bailey Sent: 15 February 2010 10:50 To: Richard Buck Subject: FW: Letter of objection relating to the proposed Adlington Boundary changes Attachments: Letter to James Ansell - Boundary Committee pdf.pdf FAO Mr Richard Buck Dear Richard Please find attached letter of objection relating to the proposed boundary change for Adlington Cheshire. Regards Andrew Bailey From: Andy Bailey Sent: 15 February 2010 10:19 To: '[email protected]' Subject: Letter of objection relating to the proposed Adlington Boundary changes FAO MR James Ansell – Cheshire East Review Officer Dear James Please find attached letter of objection relating to the proposed boundary change for Adlington Chesire. Regards Andrew Bailey 02/03/2010 15.02.10 James Ansell Cheshire east Review Officer The boundary Committee Trevalyan House Great Peters Street London SW1P 2HW FAO Mr James Ansell - Cheshire east Review Officer Dear Sir Re: Notification my objection to the boundary reorganisation for Adlington Cheshire I write to inform you of my and my families objection to the proposed boundary reorganisation which will place Adlington within the Boundary of Poynton East. We believe that Adlington being a small rural community does not fit in with the more urban communities of Poynton. We believe our interests our best served by remaining within the Prestbury and Tytherington ward. I trust the above is self explanatory however should you require any further clarification please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours Faithfully Andrew Bailey Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: William Morrison Sent: 12 February 2010 16:04 To: Richard Buck Subject: FW: bondary changes From: harold ball Sent: 12 February 2010 14:21 To: Reviews@ Subject: bondary changes Please note,as a Resident of Adlington,I want Adlington to remain part of Prestbury Ward.It should not be transfered to Poynton East or West ,merely for the administrative convenience of Local Goverment or to equalisethe number of electors per Councillor,two of your three main considerations in forming the draft proposals.The third main consideration , namely community identity seems to be completely ignored,yet it is the principal consideration that matters to the Adlington community! 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: David Bamford Sent: 12 February 2010 18:37 To: Reviews@ Please note, that as residents of Adlington,Cheshire we are opposed to the proposed transfer to Adlington from the Prestbury ward to Poynton (East or west). It appears that this decision has been taken purely for administrative convenience of the local government or to equalise the number of electors without consideration of "community identity". We feel that the interests of Adlington ,being a rural community would be more likely to be affiliated to those of the Prestbury ward and wish these sentiments to be taken into consideration when considering the appeal against this boundary change Jane & David Bamford 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: William Morrison Sent: 12 February 2010 16:10 To: Richard Buck Subject: FW: Adlington's boundary From: rebecca barker Sent: 11 February 2010 13:36 To: Reviews@ Subject: Adlington's boundary Please note, as a resident of Adlington, I want Adlington to remain part of the Prestbury Ward. It should not be trasferred to Poynton(East or West), merely for the administrative convenience of local government or to equalise the numbers of electors per councillor (two of your three main considerations in forming the draft proposals). The third main consideration, namely community identity seems to be completely ignored, yet it is the principal consideration that matters to the Adlington community! Mrs R Barker 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: William Morrison Sent: 12 February 2010 16:12 To: Richard Buck Subject: FW: Electoral View of Cheshire east Authority From: Ecosteam Sent: 10 February 2010 14:07 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral View of Cheshire east Authority Please note as a resident of Adlington i want Adlington to remain part of Prestbury ward.it should not be transferred to poynton east or west, merely for admin convenience of local government or to equalise the number of electors per councillor.( two of your 3 main considerations in forming the draft proposals) The third main consideration, namely community identity seems to be completely ignored, yrt it is the principal consideration that matters for the adlington community. Paul Barrell 02/03/2010 Page 1 of 1 Eleanor Gregory From: jbellamy Sent: 12 February 2010 21:17 To: Reviews@ Cc: James Ansell Subject: Re: Boundary Committee Future Cheshire East Council Ward Boundaries Dear Boundary Committee, We would like to object in the strongest possible terms to the Boundary Committee’s recommendation that Stapeley Rural should be included in Nantwich South as a two seat ward. Our reasons are as follows: z Stapeley Rural has no affiliation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advisory Visit River Bollin, Styal Country Park, Cheshire February
    Advisory Visit River Bollin, Styal Country Park, Cheshire February 2010 1.0 Introduction This report is the output of a site visit undertaken by Tim Jacklin of the Wild Trout Trust to the River Bollin, Cheshire on 19th February 2010. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions with Kevin Nash (Fisheries Technical Specialist) and Andy Eaves (Fisheries Technical Officer) of the Environment Agency (EA), North West Region (South Area). Normal convention is applied throughout the report with respect to bank identification, i.e. the banks are designated left hand bank (LHB) or right hand bank (RHB) whilst looking downstream. 2.0 Catchment / Fishery Overview The River Bollin is 49 km long and rises in the edge of Macclesfield Forest, flowing west to join the River Mersey (Manchester Ship Canal) near Lymm. The River Dean is the major tributary of the Bollin, and the catchment area totals 273 km2. The section of river visited flows through Styal Country Park, downstream of Quarry Bank Mill, and is owned by the National Trust. A previous Wild Trout Trust visit was carried out further downstream at the National Trust property at Dunham Massey. The Bollin falls within the remit of the Mersey Life Project which aims to carry out a phased programme of river restoration, initially focussing on the non-tidal section of the River Mersey, the River Bollin and River Goyt (http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/homeandleisure/wildlife/102362.aspx). The construction of fish passes on Heatley and Bollington Mill weirs in the lower Bollin catchment means it is now possible for migratory species (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Application No: 12/1349N Location: HUNSTERSON FISHERIES, LAND OFF BIRCHALL MOSS LANE, HUNSTERSON, NANTWICH, CHESHIRE, CW5 7PH Pr
    Application No: 12/1349N Location: HUNSTERSON FISHERIES, LAND OFF BIRCHALL MOSS LANE, HUNSTERSON, NANTWICH, CHESHIRE, CW5 7PH Proposal: Proposed Fishermans Retreat Building Applicant: MR F STRICKLAND Expiry Date: 27-Jun-2012 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to conditions Main issues: • The principle of the development • The impact of the design • The impact upon neighbouring amenity • The impact upon protected species REASON FOR REFERRAL Councillor J. Clowes has called in this application to Southern Planning Committee for the following reasons: • ‘Inappropriate and unsustainable intensification of activity on agricultural land in the open countryside. • Inappropriate size, structure and materials of the proposed building. • Consequent visual intrusion on a green field site in the open countryside. • Hazardous entry and exit to and from the site on Bridgemere Lane. • Inadequate preparation in terms of siting and management of proposed septic tank foul drainage system. • Current informal ‘presumptive’ car parking arrangements are inadequate for the numbers of vehicles proposed in this application.’ DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND CONTEXT The application site relates to land to the south of Bridgemere Lane, Hunsterson, Nantwich within the Open Countryside. The land relates to a section of open paddock adjacent to a large fishing pond set approximately 150 metres to the south of the road. Currently on site is an unauthorised touring caravan which appears to be being used as a makeshift ‘fisherman’s hut’. DETAILS OF PROPOSAL Revised plans have been submitted for the erection of a purpose built fisherman’s hut. The proposed unit would measure approximately 6.6 metres in length, 5 metres in width and would have a pitched roof approximately 4.1 metres in height from ground floor level.
    [Show full text]
  • Raven Newsletter
    TheNo.17 Winter 2011 aven RThe quarterly magazine for the whole of Rainow G Village News G Social Events G Parish Council News G Clubs & Societies G School & Church The Parish Council would like to wish everyone a very.... Happy and Peaceful Christmas and New Year Very BestWishes for 2012 Winter Gritting Signage We have asked that the bins already in place at We are endeavouring to get Highways to improve the Rainow Primary School, Chapel Lane near Millers signage for Bull Hill and hopefully prevent HGVs from Meadow, the stone bin on Lidgetts Lane, Millers using the road. Meadow (near Spinney), Sugar Lane at the junction Community Pride Competition Hough Close and on Berristall Lane be kept filled. Rainow has received the “Little Gem” award in this Highways are also depositing 1/2 tonne sacks of salt year’s competition for Trinity Gardens and Highly mix at strategic locations in the parish to assist when Commended for the Raven newsletter. the weather is particularly wintery. They will be dropped on the verge as they are and the salt can be spread Civic Service from the sack. We have asked for sacks at the top of The Civic Service was once again a great success Sugar Lane, top of Round Meadow near telephone with Steve Rathbone providing, as ever, a splendid kiosk, Berristall Lane (should the bin not be filled), service. Over Alderley Brass Band accompanied the Tower Hill and mid-point of Kiskill Lane. In addition, choir and congregation with the hymns. Amongst the Tom Briggs will continue to salt Round Meadow, Millers guests were the Mayor of Cheshire East Roger West, Meadow and Sugar Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy: Examination (Resumed Hearings)
    Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy: Examination (Resumed Hearings) Supplementary Statement submitted on behalf of BDW Trading Limited (Representor Number: 750734) in relation to Matter 5: Urban Potential and Site- Selection Methodology St James Park, Wilmslow (formerly known as Land at Little Stanneylands) September 2015 Does the assessment of Urban Potential and Site Selection Methodology fully consider the potential for development within and around the existing towns and settlements in Cheshire East, including development of smaller sites within the built-up area or on the fringes of settlements in the north of the area and the balance between brownfield and greenfield sites, and provide an appropriate, consistent, objective, justified and effective approach to the selection of sites, in line with national guidance and fully addressing the Inspector’s concerns in his Interim Views, particularly in terms of: a) Urban Potential Study 1. BDW Trading Limited (BDW) would raise the following general points in relation to the robustness of the Urban Potential Study: • The study has applied a density of 30dph across all sites, ‘unless [there is] a clear reason to deviate from this’. It is not clear whether this is a gross or net density. It would appear somewhat overly simplistic to apply a 30dph density across all sites without considering the gross to net ratio, even on a standardised basis. • This study is entirely separate from the SHLAA and does not follow accepted SHLAA methodology. Crucially it does not include any specific consideration of deliverability, and particularly viability. 2. BDW would note that even with these concerns, the potential for new housing sites within the built-up area of Wilmslow is very low.
    [Show full text]
  • Audlem Doddington Wybunbury Parish Profile
    THE BENEFICE OF AUDLEM, DODDINGTON AND WYBUNBURY. The benefice was created in February 2010. Prior to that Doddington and Wybunbury were linked but Audlem was a single parish church. On the retirement of the incumbent at Wybunbury and Doddington, the benefice was created with the in situ incumbent for Audlem being appointed Vicar to the 3 churches. Since this time, the churches have retained their own identities, services and PCC’s but also work well together. People do support events at each of the churches. 2 Lay Readers work across all 3 churches, one retired priest supports services in Audlem, the other is at Doddington most weeks with occasional services in Wybunbury. It is located near to main line train services in Crewe, close to junction 16 of the M6. What we offer to our new incumbent • welcoming and supportive congregations and communities ● our prayerful support and encouragement ● our respect for your home life, your prayer life and encouragement and support to take holidays and regular time off each week ● the support of 2 retired Priests on a regular basis, 2 Lay Readers, strong PCC’s and experienced Church Wardens. Also many volunteers are willing to lead intercessions or read in church and a group take part in ‘open the book’ school worship. ● excellent and close links with 4 caring and effective C of E primary schools ● a church band at Wybunbury that enhances worship in a modern designed church. A singing group and musicians group at Audlem. Organists in each church. ● a large 4-bedroom modern purpose-built vicarage with good size garden adjacent to St.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrightmarshall.Co.Uk
    ‘THE FIRS FARMHOUSE BARN’ | WOORE ROAD | BUERTON | CHESHIRE | CW3 0DD | GUIDE PRICE £250,000 COUNTRY HOMES │ COTTAGES │ UNIQUE PROPERTIES │ CONVERSIONS │ PERIOD PROPERTIES │ LUXURY APARTMENTS wrightmarshall.co.uk ‘The Firs Farmhouse Barn’, Woore Road, Buerton, Cheshire, CW3 0DD A superb opportunity to acquire a period detached barn requiring conversion standing in a wonderful rural location with views over adjoining farmland. With the benefit of planning permission for the conversion to one dwelling (Ref: 17/3939N). The existing barn is positioned end on to the road itself, and boasts wonderful views to the side & rear. Access presently is shared with the adjoining property, 'The Firs Farmhouse', however provision has been made within the planning permission, for a separate entrance to be created in due course for the sole use of the farmhouse, therefore the barn will have its own access leading to the parking, proposed garage etc. NO CHAIN NEARBY AUDLEM VILLAGE DIRECTIONS In a county considered as prosperous as Cheshire, a village as well Take the A529 Audlem Road out of Nantwich and continue for serviced as Audlem may become complacent about the services & approximately 7 miles into Audlem village. Upon reaching the village facilities it provides but it has demonstrated that it certainly doesn't square turn left onto the A525 Woore Road, continue for take its facilities for granted. Annual events in the Village include a approximately 1.3 miles and the barn will be observed on the left hand Transport Festival, Music & Arts Festival and Open Gardens Weekend. side. Recent Awards won by Audlem Village: Regional title for North (AUDLEM 1.5 miles : NANTWICH 7 miles : NEWCASTLE UNDER England as well as overall award for Building Community Life LYME 12 miles : CREWE MAINLINE RAILWAY STATION 10 miles : (sponsored by DEFRA-Department for Environment, Food & Rural M6 JUNCTION 16, 12 miles) Affairs) in the 2005 Calor Village of the Year.
    [Show full text]
  • C/R/D Summary Skeleton Document
    Application No: 17/4521M Location: Land at Stanneylands Road, Wilmslow,, SK9 4ER Proposal: Full planning application for the erection of 174 residential dwellings, new roundabout onto Stanneylands Road, public open space, pedestrian/cycleway connection between Linneys Bridge and the River Dean, a new bridge crossing of the River Dean, and associated works. Applicant: Andrew Taylor, Barratt & David Wilson Homes North West Expiry Date: 22-Dec-2017 SUMMARY The site is allocated within the Local Plan for residential use and consists of the entire LPS56 allocation. The development accords with the Local Plan policy relating to its allocation by providing housing. The applicant is providing financial contributions required in order to make the development acceptable and is providing the full amount of affordable housing on site which is essential in order to make developments sustainable in the future. It is considered that the proposals are environmental, socially and economically sustainable and accord with the development plan and the framework. The site is sustainably located within the town and the proposals represent an efficient use of the land. Cheshire East is currently able to demonstrate a 5 year supply of housing however this site is included within the 5 year supply and as a result this proposal will make a valuable contribution in maintaining this position. The design and layout of the development are in accordance with the Cheshire East Design Guide and no issues have been identified in respect of overlooking or other amenity impacts. It has been demonstrated the development will not have a detrimental impact on the local highway network, the trees on and around the site, to local ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Application No: 10/4485N Location: WHITTAKERS GREEN FARM, PEWIT LANE, BRIDGEMERE, CW5 7PP Proposal
    Application No: 10/4485N Location: WHITTAKERS GREEN FARM, PEWIT LANE, BRIDGEMERE, CW5 7PP Proposal: Application for Removal or Variation of a Condition following Grant of Planning Permission: 7/09/CCC/0001 Applicant: Mr Rushton Expiry Date: 14-Jan-2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Partial approval, amended condition. MAIN ISSUES: Impact of HGV movements on residential amenity and conflict with school drop off and pick up times. Use of the site to receive green waste from Household waste and recycling centres on Bank Holidays. REASON FOR REPORT AND NATURE OF APPLICATION Due to the site area, this application is considered to be a major waste application and should therefore be determined by the Strategic Planning Board in accordance with the established terms of reference. DESCRIPTION OF SITE The application site is an existing green waste composting facility, located within the open countryside, approximately 8.5 miles south east of Nantwich and a kilometre south of Hunsterson. The surrounding countryside is slightly undulating, divided into medium sized fields utilised for arable production. There are a number of isolated properties and farm units widely spaced surrounding the compost site. The nearest residential property, Fox Moss, is 230 metres to the north east of the site, with Pewit House a further 200 metres away to the north east. The Uplands lies 440 metres and Whittakers Green Farm is located 470 metres to the north of the application site. Woodend is 350 metres to the east of the site, and Woodfall Hall Farm is 670 metres to the south west. The site has a weighbridge and small office and on-site facility building at its entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire East Care Services Directory 2015
    Cheshire East Care Services Directory 2015 Tatton Hall The comprehensive guide to choosing and paying for your care • Home support • Housing options • Care helpline • Care homes Cheshire East Council In association with www.carechoices.co.uk Publications The Home Care Specialists Do you need a Helping Hand? “We are incredibly fortunate to have such dedicated Live-in Care... an alternative people, like the staff at Helping Hands, caring for the vulnerable and the to residential care. elderly members of the communities.” At Helping Hands we have been providing award winning Lisa Carr, Director of The quality home care since 1989. Still family run, we apply our Great British Care Awards local knowledge and 25 years of home care experience to offer ds 25th A an nn H iv one to one care that enables you or your loved one to remain g e n r i s p a l r e y at home with compassion and dignity. H Our locally based Carers are able to balance independent 25Years living with bespoke care needs by assisting with housekeeping, companionship, providing a break for an existing care giver, personal care, support with continence and hospital discharge. So if you are looking for an alternative to residential care or extra support for those everyday tasks that are becoming a little more difficult, then we’re here to help - 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. To find out how we can help you, call: 01270 861 745 or visit: www.helpinghands.co.uk Contents Introduction from Cheshire East Council 4 Paying for care 19 Healthy lifestyles 5 Protecting adults from harm
    [Show full text]
  • Counciltaxbase201819appendix , Item 47
    APPENDIX A COUNCIL TAX - TAXBASE 2018/19 COUNCIL TAX - TAXBASE 2018/19 BAND D TAX BASE BAND D TAX BASE CHESHIRE EAST EQUIVALENTS 99.00% CHESHIRE EAST EQUIVALENTS 99.00% Acton 163.82 162.18 Kettleshulme 166.87 165.20 Adlington 613.67 607.53 Knutsford 5,813.84 5,755.70 Agden 72.04 71.32 Lea 20.78 20.57 Alderley Edge 2,699.00 2,672.01 Leighton 1,770.68 1,752.97 Alpraham 195.94 193.98 Little Bollington 88.34 87.45 Alsager 4,498.81 4,453.82 Little Warford 37.82 37.44 Arclid 154.71 153.17 Lower Peover 75.81 75.05 Ashley 164.05 162.41 Lower Withington 308.54 305.45 Aston by Budworth 181.97 180.15 Lyme Handley 74.74 74.00 Aston-juxta-Mondrum 89.56 88.66 Macclesfield 18,407.42 18,223.35 Audlem 937.36 927.98 Macclesfield Forest/Wildboarclough 112.25 111.13 Austerson 49.34 48.85 Marbury-cum-Quoisley 128.25 126.97 Baddiley 129.37 128.07 Marton 113.19 112.06 Baddington 61.63 61.02 Mere 445.42 440.96 Barthomley 98.14 97.16 Middlewich 4,887.05 4,838.18 Basford 92.23 91.31 Millington 101.43 100.42 Batherton 24.47 24.23 Minshull Vernon 149.65 148.16 Betchton 277.16 274.39 Mobberley 1,458.35 1,443.77 Bickerton 125.31 124.05 Moston 277.53 274.76 Blakenhall 70.16 69.46 Mottram St Andrew 416.18 412.02 Bollington 3,159.33 3,127.74 Nantwich 5,345.68 5,292.23 Bosley 208.63 206.54 Nether Alderley 386.48 382.61 Bradwall 85.68 84.82 Newbold Astbury-cum-Moreton 374.85 371.10 Brereton 650.89 644.38 Newhall 413.32 409.18 Bridgemere 66.74 66.07 Norbury 104.94 103.89 Brindley 73.30 72.56 North Rode 125.29 124.04 Broomhall 87.47 86.59 Odd Rode 1,995.13 1,975.18 Buerton
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Cheshire Place-Names
    INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Acton, 12 Bowdon, 14 Adlington, 7 Bradford, 12 Alcumlow, 9 Bradley, 12 Alderley, 3, 9 Bradwall, 14 Aldersey, 10 Bramhall, 14 Aldford, 1,2, 12, 21 Bredbury, 12 Alpraham, 9 Brereton, 14 Alsager, 10 Bridgemere, 14 Altrincham, 7 Bridge Traffbrd, 16 n Alvanley, 10 Brindley, 14 Alvaston, 10 Brinnington, 7 Anderton, 9 Broadbottom, 14 Antrobus, 21 Bromborough, 14 Appleton, 12 Broomhall, 14 Arden, 12 Bruera, 21 Arley, 12 Bucklow, 12 Arrowe, 3 19 Budworth, 10 Ashton, 12 Buerton, 12 Astbury, 13 Buglawton, II n Astle, 13 Bulkeley, 14 Aston, 13 Bunbury, 10, 21 Audlem, 5 Burton, 12 Austerson, 10 Burwardsley, 10 Butley, 10 By ley, 10 Bache, 11 Backford, 13 Baddiley, 10 Caldecote, 14 Baddington, 7 Caldy, 17 Baguley, 10 Calveley, 14 Balderton, 9 Capenhurst, 14 Barnshaw, 10 Garden, 14 Barnston, 10 Carrington, 7 Barnton, 7 Cattenhall, 10 Barrow, 11 Caughall, 14 Barthomley, 9 Chadkirk, 21 Bartington, 7 Cheadle, 3, 21 Barton, 12 Checkley, 10 Batherton, 9 Chelford, 10 Bebington, 7 Chester, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12, 16, 17, Beeston, 13 19,21 Bexton, 10 Cheveley, 10 Bickerton, 14 Chidlow, 10 Bickley, 10 Childer Thornton, 13/; Bidston, 10 Cholmondeley, 9 Birkenhead, 14, 19 Cholmondeston, 10 Blackden, 14 Chorley, 12 Blacon, 14 Chorlton, 12 Blakenhall, 14 Chowley, 10 Bollington, 9 Christleton, 3, 6 Bosden, 10 Church Hulme, 21 Bosley, 10 Church Shocklach, 16 n Bostock, 10 Churton, 12 Bough ton, 12 Claughton, 19 171 172 INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Claverton, 14 Godley, 10 Clayhanger, 14 Golborne, 14 Clifton, 12 Gore, 11 Clive, 11 Grafton,
    [Show full text]
  • Stapeley and Batherton Neighbourhood Plan: Housing Needs Assessment
    Stapeley and Batherton Neighbourhood Plan: Housing Needs Assessment Final Report January 2016 www.housingvision.co.uk 1 Stapeley and Batherton Neighbourhood Plan: Housing Needs Assessment Final Report Project Director: Dr Richard Turkington Director The Housing Vision Consultancy 59 Stocks Lane Newland Malvern Worcs. WR13 5AZ 01886 833118 (phone) 01886 830102 (phone/fax) 07714 106386 (mobile) [email protected] www.housingvision.co.uk Date: 12 th January 2016 2 Contents Section Title Page Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 8 2. Demographic profile and the current 10 supply of housing 3. The current need for housing: 44 survey findings 4. The future need for housing 63 Appendix 1 Survey questionnaire 74 Appendix 2 Survey covering letter 79 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES1: The Assessment consists of three sections: 1. a demographic profile and assessment of current housing supply: a range of data with relevance to housing need has been collated for the two parishes in the context of the borough of Cheshire East; the North West region and England. Census data has been compared to identify changes between 2001 and 2011. 2. an assessment of current housing need: this is based on a postal survey of all 1,434 households in the Parish; and 3. an assessment of current future housing need: a 20 year projection of the future need for housing based on demographic (population and household) data for the period 2010-2030. ES2: The population in the Stapeley and Batherton area grew by 219.2% from 1,084 people in 2001 to 3,460 people in 2011 and the number of households grew by 186.3% from 431 in 2001 to 1,234 in 2011.
    [Show full text]