Curriculum Vita Pippa Norris
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Arab States Lag in Gender Equality
MECCA OR OIL? NORRIS 2/16/2011 1:40 PM Mecca or oil? Why Arab states lag in gender equality Pippa Norris (Harvard University and the University of Sydney) McGuire Lecturer in Comparative Politics Visiting Professor of Government and IR John F. Kennedy School of Government The University of Sydney Harvard University Department of Government & IR Cambridge, MA 02138 NSW, 2006 [email protected] [email protected] www.pippanorris.com www.arts.sydney.edu.au Synopsis: Why do Arab states continue to lag behind the rest of the world in gender equality? Cultural values and structural resources offer two alternative perspectives. Drawing upon Inglehart’s modernization theory, cultural accounts emphasize that disparities are reinforced by the predominance of traditional attitudes towards the roles of women and men in developing societies, combined with the strength of religiosity in the Middle East and North Africa (Inglehart and Norris 2003, Norris and Inglehart 2004). An alternative structural view is presented by the ‘petroleum patriarchy’ thesis, developed by Michael Ross (2008), which claims that oil‐rich economies directly limit the role of women in the paid workforce and thus also (indirectly) restrict women’s representation in parliament. To consider these issues, Part I outlines these theoretical arguments. Part II discusses the most appropriate research design used to analyze the evidence. Part III presents multilevel models using the World Values Survey 1995‐2005 in 75‐83 societies demonstrating that religious traditions have a greater influence on attitudes towards gender equality and sexual liberalization than either labor force participation or oil rents. Part IV then demonstrates the impact of these cultural attitudes on the proportion of women in legislative and ministerial office. -
Inglehart Mass Priorities and Democracy
Perspectives on Politics (forthcoming, March, 2010) 1 Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy RONALD INGLEHART University of Michigan CHRISTIAN WELZEL Jacobs University Bremen Introduction. Rich countries are much likelier to be democracies than poor countries. Why this is true is debated fiercely. Simply reaching a given level of economic development could not itself produce democracy; it can do so only by bringing changes in how people act. Accordingly, Seymour Martin Lipset (1959) argued that development leads to democracy because it produces certain socio-cultural changes that shape human actions. The empirical data that would be needed to test this claim did not exist then, so his suggestion remained a passing comment.1 Today, large-N comparative surveys make the relevant data available for most of the world’s population, and there have been major advances in analytic techniques. But social scientists rarely put the two together, partly because of a persisting tendency to view mass attitudinal data as volatile and unreliable. In this piece we wish to redress this situation. We argue that certain modernization-linked mass attitudes are stable attributes of given societies that are being measured reliably by the large-N comparative survey projects, even in low-income countries, and that these attitudes seem to play important roles in social changes such as democratization. Our purpose here is not to demonstrate the impact of changing values on democracy so much as to make a point about the epistemology of survey data with important ramifications for the way we analyze democracy. Unlike dozens of articles we’ve published that nail down one hypothesis about one dependent variable, this piece analyzes data from almost 400 surveys to demonstrate that modernization-linked attitudes are stable attributes of given societies and are strongly linked with many important societal-level variables, ranging from civil society to democracy to gender equality. -
PDF – Comparative Democracies Syllabus
Comparative+Democracies+ Prof.+William+Crotty+ Northeastern+University+ ! ! Course+Introduction+ This course is divided into three parts. First, there will be a discussion of democratization and the democratization processes. Second, there will be a discussion of developing governance in difference contexts, from Third World countries in the process of evolving into a democratic state to “failed” democracies to states attempting to reinstate democratic processes. Third, we will look at alternative governing arrangements, including authoritarianism and totalitarianism. Attention will be given to both the prerequisites for democratic development and their application and relevance in different national contexts.! Each student will be required to review a book from a list supplied by the instructor. The studies analyze aspects of democratic development or institution-building in various countries (these would include constitutions; parliaments; the comparative power of the executive; changes in the culture of systems; political parties; elections and electoral systems; etc). Reports on books will be given in class and the final typed copy of report will be due at the last class meeting. In delivering the reports in class, each student will be required to include for the other class members a short (1-2 page) outline of their report. Requirements+ 1. Students should read the assigned readings prior to the class meeting to be prepared to discuss them in class. 2. There will be a midterm quiz on all materials (readings, class lectures and discussions) up to the point of the quiz. 3. A class report (see below). 4. A final exam covering all course materials will be two hours in length and will be given at the time scheduled by the university during finals’ week. -
The World Values Survey in the New Independent States C
THE WORLD’S LARGEST SOCIAL SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE AND ACADEMIC SURVEY RESEARCH PROGRAM: THE WORLD VALUES SURVEY IN THE NEW INDEPENDENT STATES C. Haerpfer1, K. Kizilova2* 1University of Vienna, Austria 2V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine The World Values Survey (WVS) is an international research program developed to assess the im- pact of values stability or change over time on the social, political and economic development of countries and societies. It started in 1981 by Ronald Inglehart and his team, since then has involved more than 100 world societies and turned into the largest non-commercial cross-national empirical time-series inves- tigation of human beliefs and values ever executed on a global scale. The article consists of a few sections differing by the focus. The authors begin with the description of survey methodology and organization management that both ensure cross-national and cross-regional comparative character of the study (the survey is implemented using the same questionnaire, a face-to-face mode of interviews, and the same sample type in every country). The next part of the article presents a short overview of the project history and comparative surveys’ time-series (so called “waves” — periods between two and four years long during which collection of data in several dozens of countries using one same questionnaire is taking place; such waves are conducted every five years). Here the authors describe every wave of the WVS mentioning coordination and management activities that were determined by the extension of the project thematically and geographically. After that the authors identify the key features of the WVS in the New Independent States and mention some of the results of the study conducted in NIS countries in 1990—2014, such as high level of uncertainty in the choice of ideological preferences; rapid growth of declared religiosity; ob- served gap between the declared values and actual facts of social life, etc. -
Editorial Manager(Tm) for British Journal of Political Science Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: Title: Freedom in Mass Value
Editorial Manager(tm) for British Journal of Political Science Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: Title: Freedom in Mass Values - Egocentric, Humanistic, or Both? Using Isaiah Berlin to Understand a Contemporary Debate Article Type: Article Section/Category: US Corresponding Author: Ms. Gina Linda Gustavsson, Masters Corresponding Author's Institution: Uppsala University First Author: Gina Linda Gustavsson, Masters Order of Authors: Gina Linda Gustavsson, Masters Manuscript Region of Origin: SWEDEN Abstract: Does an increasing emphasis on individual freedom in mass values erode or revitalize democracy? The present paper offers a new approach to this urgent debate by looking at it through the lense of Isaiah Berlin, and his distinction between positive and negative freedom. I show that, contrary to the common assumption among scholars who study mass values regarding freedom, these do not consist of one dimension but two: negative freedom, which leads to openness to diversity as well as disrespect for rules; and positive freedom, which does not cause openness to diversity and in fact increases respect for rules. The results rely on confirmatory factor and regression analyses on World Values Survey data from ten affluent Western countries in 2005-2007. *Cover Letter Freedom in Mass Values – Egocentric, Humanistic, or Both? Using Isaiah Berlin to Understand a Contemporary Debate Keywords: libertarianism, self-expression, autonomy, dimensionality, democratic values, liberal values, moral permissiveness, factor analysis Abstract: Does an increasing emphasis on individual freedom in mass values erode or revitalize democracy? The present paper offers a new approach to this urgent debate by looking at it through the lense of Isaiah Berlin, and his distinction between positive and negative freedom. -
IB 15 Bosch Religion FINAL:28770 AICGS IB9.Qxd.Qxd
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY GERMAN STUDIES ■ THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY AICGSISSUEBRIEF MAY 2007 Religion and Politics: The European Debate 15 BY KARIN L. JOHNSTON The number of books, conferences, and media programs focusing on the resurgence of reli- What challenges do gion in domestic and international politics is an indicator of how important this issue has European countries face become to both policymakers and the public at large. Religion, we are told, shapes our lives with regard to the interaction at every level—local, national, and international. Christian conservatives on a school board in of religion and politics? Kansas vote to include the teaching of intelligent design in public school biology classes, only to have the decision reversed by a new slate of board officials elected by less-conservative What impact may this voters. The immigration of large numbers of Muslims to European countries has intensified debate have on the United national debates about citizenship laws, the wearing of religious symbols in public schools, States in the long-term? and the socioeconomic problems faced by minorities, all of which cast a glaring light on the need for lowering unemployment, addressing discrimination, reducing crime, and improving How will Europe’s growing education. New communications technologies have globalized religious activities and enabled Muslim population influence religious extremists to quickly mobilize support around the world. the debate? This revitalization of religion in countries around the world was not supposed to happen, partic- ularly in a secularized Europe. Common wisdom held that the process of modernization in a country was a powerful antidote to religion and religious conflicts; the more a society modern- ized, the more secular and less religious it became. -
SLC 394 Culture and Society Transformation Global Awareness (G)
Arizona State University Criteria Checklist for GLOBAL AWARENESS [G] Rationale and Objectives Human organizations and relationships have evolved from being family and village centered to modern global interdependence. The greatest challenge in the nuclear age is developing and maintaining a global perspective which fosters international cooperation. While the modern world is comprised of politically independent states, people must transcend nationalism and recognize the significant interdependence among peoples of the world. The exposure of students to different cultural systems provides the background of thought necessary to developing a global perspective. Cultural learning is present in many disciplines. Exposure to perspectives on art, business, engineering, music, and the natural and social sciences that lead to an understanding of the contemporary world supports the view that intercultural interaction has become a daily necessity. The complexity of American society forces people to balance regional and national goals with global concerns. Many of the most serious problems are world issues and require solutions which exhibit mutuality and reciprocity. No longer are hunger, ecology, health care delivery, language planning, information exchanges, economic and social developments, law, technology transfer, philosophy, and the arts solely national concerns; they affect all the people of the world. Survival may be dependent on the ability to generate global solutions to some of the most pressing problems. The word university, from universitas, implies that knowledge comes from many sources and is not restricted to local, regional, or national perspectives. The Global Awareness Area recognizes the need for an understanding of the values, elements, and social processes of cultures other than the culture of the United States. -
PIPPA NORRIS Is Associate Director (Research) of the Joan Shorenstein
Pippa Norris PIPPA NORRIS is the McGuire Lecturer in Comparative Politics at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. She has also served recently as the Director of the Democratic Governance Group at the United Nations Development Program in New York. Her research compares public opinion and elections, democratic institutions and cultures, gender politics, and political communications in many countries worldwide. A well-known public speaker and prolific author, she has now published almost forty books. This includes a dozen volumes for Cambridge University Press: A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies (2000, winner of the 2006 Doris A. Graber award for the best book in political communications), Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide (2001), Democratic Phoenix: Political Activism Worldwide (2002) and Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the Globe (with Ronald Inglehart, 2003), Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior (2004), Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide (with Ronald Inglehart, 2004, winner of the Virginia Hodgkinson prize from the Independent Sector), Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market (2005), Driving Democracy: Do power-sharing institutions work? (2008) and Cosmopolitan Communications: Cultural Diversity in a Globalizing World (2009, with Ronald Inglehart). Her most recent research concerns a new book for Cambridge, Democratic Deficits. Other authored or coauthored -
Curriculum Vita Pippa Norris
PIPPA NORRIS CURRICULUM VITAE 7/25/2021 JOHN F. KENNEDY SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT • HARVARD UNIVERSITY CAMBRIDGE MA 02138 • TEL: (857) 4 4 5 - 9105 E - MAIL [email protected] TWITTER: @PIPPAN15 WWW.PIPPANORRIS.COM WWW.ELECTORALINTEGRITYPROJECT.COM PIPPA NORRIS CURRICULUM VITAE CONTENTS MAIN FIELDS OF RESEARCH ............................................................................................. 2 AGE ....................................................................................................................................... 2 EDUCATION ......................................................................................................................... 2 QUALIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................ 2 FULLTIME APPOINTMENTS: .............................................................................................. 2 MAJOR HONORS: ................................................................................................................. 3 CITATION IMPACT: ............................................................................................................. 4 TEACHING: .......................................................................................................................... 4 PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES AND MEMBERSHIPS: .......................................................... 4 EDITORIAL BOARDS: .......................................................................................................... 5 AUTHORED -
Tuned out Voters? Media Impact on Campaign Learning
TUNED OUT VOTERS ~ PIPPA NORRIS LAST UPDATED: 2/16/2004 7:34 PM Tuned Out Voters? Media Impact on Campaign Learning Pippa Norris John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] www.pippanorris.com Synopsis: What are the consequences of the rise of mediated or indirect channels linking parties and the electorate in modern and post-modern campaigns? Critics commonly blame the mass media (and particularly the role of television) for many of the supposed ills of representative democracy, from public disenchantment with elected leaders to increasing detachment from party loyalties, lack of awareness of public affairs, and half-empty empty ballot boxes. The argument presented in this study has three core components. Firstly, long-term evidence of trends in American elections over the last fifty years demonstrates that reports of the ill health, or even death, of traditional partisan channels of campaign communication are grossly exaggerated. Secondly evidence from the 2000 Bush-Gore US presidential elections confirms that far from ‘blaming the messenger’, the role of exposure to campaign information from parties, newspapers, television news, talk radio, and the Internet has been to strengthen civic engagement in America. Lastly, expanding upon previous work, the study considers the role of popular television entertainment in this process. P O L I T E I A C O N F E R E N C E — M A Y 3RD 2 0 0 2 P A L E I S D E R A C A D E M I Ë N, H E R T O G S S T R A A T 1 , 1 0 0 0 B R U S S E L S 1 TUNED OUT VOTERS ~ PIPPA NORRIS LAST UPDATED: 2/16/2004 7:34 PM There is widespread concern that the nature of mass politics changed during the late twentieth century, and indeed changed largely for the worse, in most post-industrial societies. -
Building Political Parties
Building political parties: Reforming legal regulations and internal rules Pippa Norris Harvard University Report commissioned by International IDEA 2004 1 Contents 1. Executive summary........................................................................................................................... 3 2. The role and function of parties....................................................................................................... 3 3. Principles guiding the legal regulation of parties ........................................................................... 5 3.1. The legal regulation of nomination, campaigning, and elections .................................................................. 6 3.2 The nomination stage: party registration and ballot access ......................................................................... 8 3.3 The campaign stage: funding and media access...................................................................................... 12 3.4 The electoral system: electoral rules and party competition....................................................................... 13 3.5: Conclusions: the challenges of the legal framework ................................................................................ 17 4. Strengthening the internal life of political parties......................................................................... 20 4.1 Promoting internal democracy within political parties ............................................................................. 20 4.2 Building -
Inglehart How Much Should We Worry.Pdf
+RZ0XFK6KRXOG:H:RUU\" 5RQDOG),QJOHKDUW -RXUQDORI'HPRFUDF\9ROXPH1XPEHU-XO\SS $UWLFOH 3XEOLVKHGE\-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV '2, KWWSVGRLRUJMRG )RUDGGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKLVDUWLFOH KWWSVPXVHMKXHGXDUWLFOH Access provided by University of California, San Diego (30 Nov 2016 18:58 GMT) The Danger of Deconsolidation HOW MUCH SHOULD WE WORRY? Ronald F. Inglehart Ronald F. Inglehart, Amy and Alan Lowenstein Professor of Democ- racy, Democratization, and Human Rights at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan and codirector of the Labora- tory for Comparative Social Research at the Higher School of Eco- nomics in St. Petersburg, Russia, directs the World Values Survey, which has surveyed representative national samples of the publics of 97 countries. In this issue of the Journal of Democracy, Roberto Foa and Yascha Mounk write that the citizens of many countries are becoming dissat- isfied with democracy and increasingly open to nondemocratic alter- natives. The authors present considerable evidence in support of this claim, concluding that democracy is in danger. Although I agree that overt mass support for democracy is currently weakening, Foa and Mounk’s data suggest that this phenomenon is, in large part, a specifically American period effect, as the age-linked dif- ferences found in the United States are much greater than those found in other countries. For example, in Figure 1 of their essay, which shows the percentage of people who consider it “essential” to live in a demo- cratically governed country, there is a 41-point difference between the youngest and oldest U.S. birth groups; the difference between the com- parable European age cohorts is only 9 or 10 points.1 The United States also stands out on a number of other variables as showing much larger changes in public opinion than most other countries.