DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF File Created from a TIFF Image by Tiff2pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NEW ISSUE — BOOK ENTRY ONLY

In the opinion of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P., Bond Counsel, under existing law, (i)   assuming compliance with certain covenants and the accuracy of certain representations, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations and (ii)   interest on, and any profit made on the sale, exchange or other disposition of, the Bonds are exempt from the
Ohio personal income tax, the net income base of the Ohio corporate franchise tax, and municipal and school district income taxes in Ohio. Interest on the Bonds may be subject to certain federal taxes imposed only on certain corporations, including the corporate alternative minimum tax on a portion of that interest. For a more complete discussion of the tax aspects, see ‘‘Tax Matters’’ herein.

$100,000,000
STATE OF OHIO
HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITY REVENUE BONDS

(CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY 2002 PROJECT)

  • $64,875,000 Series A
  • $35,125,000 Series B

  • (Variable Rate)
  • (Fixed Rate)

The Series   A Bonds and Series   B Bonds, when, as and if issued, will be special obligations of the State of Ohio issued by the Ohio
Higher Educational Facility Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to two separate Trust Agreements, dated as of May   15, 2002 (the ‘‘Series A   Trust Agreement’’ and ‘‘Series   B Trust Agreement’’, respectively), between the Commission and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (the ‘‘Trustee’’). The Series   A Bonds and the Series   B Bonds (collectively, the ‘‘Bonds’’) are issued to pay costs of certain educational facilities, as described herein. The Series A Bonds and the Series B Bonds will be payable from the revenue and other money pledged by the Series A Trust Agreement and the Series B Trust Agreement, respectively, which include the payments required to be made by Case Western Reserve University (the ‘‘University’’) under certain Leases between the Commission and

CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY

The Bonds are issuable as registered bonds without coupons and initially will be registered only in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (‘‘DTC’’), which will act as securities depository for the Bonds. The Bonds will be issuable only under the book-entry system maintained by DTC through brokers and dealers who are, or act through, DTC Participants or Indirect Participants, and purchasers of the Bonds will not receive physical delivery of bond certificates. Principal of and premium, if any, on the Bonds will be payable to the registered owner upon presentation and surrender at the designated corporate trust office of the Trustee in Cleveland, Ohio, and interest will be transmitted by the Trustee on each interest payment date to the registered owner as of the record date preceding that interest payment date, all as more fully described herein.

The Series   A Bonds may bear interest at a Daily Rate, Weekly Rate, Commercial Paper Rate, Dutch Auction Rate or Term Rate.
While a Series   A Bond bears interest at any of these rates, such Series   A Bonds will be deemed to be in a Daily Rate Period, a Weekly Rate Period, a Commercial Paper Rate Period, a Dutch Auction Rate Period or a Term Rate Period, respectively (each a ‘‘Rate Period’’). Initially, all of the Series   A Bonds will be issued in a Daily Rate Period and will remain in that Rate Period until converted to another Rate Period as described herein. Interest on the Series   A Bonds, while such Bonds bear interest at the Daily Rate, is payable on the first Business Day of each month, commencing July   1, 2002. While the Series   A Bonds bear interest at the Daily Rate, the Series   A Bonds will be available to purchasers in denominations of $100,000 and integral multiples of $5,000 in excess thereof.

Interest on the Series B Bonds will be payable on each April 1 and October 1, commencing October 1, 2002. While the Series   A Bonds are in a Daily Rate Period, Series   A Bondholders will have the right to tender their Series   A Bonds for purchase at the times and subject to the conditions set forth in the Series   A Trust Agreement. The Bonds also are subject to optional and mandatory redemption prior to maturity and to optional and mandatory tender for purchase as described herein.

In the event and to the extent that the Series A Bonds are not remarketed by the remarketing agent, the Series   A Bonds will be purchased pursuant to the terms of a Standby Bond Purchase Agreement, dated as of May   15, 2002 (the ‘‘Initial Liquidity Facility’’),
..

among the University, the Trustee and Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen Girozentrale (the ‘‘Bank’’), subject, however, to the terms and conditions stated therein. The Initial Liquidity Facility will expire on June   3, 2003, unless extended or terminated sooner in accordance with its terms.

The Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the Commission and accepted by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as representative for itself, NatCity Investments, Inc. and McDonald Investments Inc. (collectively, the ‘‘Underwriters’’), subject to the receipt of the approving legal opinion of Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P., Bond Counsel. Certain legal matters will be passed upon for the University by Joel Makee, Esq., as University Counsel, and for the Underwriters by their counsel, Thompson Hine LLP. Public Financial Management, Inc. has served as financial advisor to the University. It is expected that the Bonds will be available for delivery through DTC on or about June   5, 2002.

The Bonds do not represent or constitute a debt or pledge of the faith and credit of the Commission or the State of Ohio and will not be secured by an obligation or pledge of any money raised by taxation, and do not grant to the Holders any rights to have the State levy any taxes or appropriate funds for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds.

MORGAN STANLEY
NATCITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
McDONALD INVESTMENTS INC.

A KeyCorp Company

This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of this Offering Circular. Investors must read the entire Offering Circular to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision.

May 28, 2002

Series A Bonds

Dated: Date of delivery Due: October 1, 2031
Price: 100%

Series B Bonds

Dated: May 15, 2002
Due: October 1 as set forth below

Due
October 1
Principal Amount
Interest Rate
Price or Yield

2019 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022
$6,500,000
5,610,000 1,330,000
10,000,000
1,650,000
10,035,000
5.500% 5.500% 5.000% 5.500% 5.125% 5.500%
103.740% 103.252%
5.140%
102.847%
5.180%
102.525%

(plus accrued interest from May 15, 2002)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................... 1 THE COMMISSION........................................................................................................................................... 3 THE UNIVERSITY............................................................................................................................................ 3 THE PROJECTS AND USE OF PROCEEDS ................................................................................................... 4 THE BONDS....................................................................................................................................................... 4 SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT ................................................................................................ 22 THE GUARANTIES......................................................................................................................................... 24 ENFORCEABILITY OF REMEDIES.............................................................................................................. 25 ABSENCE OF MATERIAL LITIGATION ..................................................................................................... 25 ELIGIBILITY UNDER OHIO LAW FOR INVESTMENT ............................................................................ 26 TAX MATTERS............................................................................................................................................... 26 APPROVAL OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ..................................................................................................... 28 RATINGS.......................................................................................................................................................... 28 UNDERWRITING............................................................................................................................................ 29 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE ........................................................................................................................ 29 UNIVERSITY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ................................................................................................. 31 MISCELLANEOUS.......................................................................................................................................... 31 CONSENT TO DISTRIBUTION ..................................................................................................................... 32 APPENDICES

AB
--
Case Western Reserve University Case Western Reserve University Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001 (with Independent Auditors’ Report thereon) Certain Defined Terms and Summary of Certain Provisions of the Trust Agreements, the Leases and the Tax Agreements

  • C
  • -

DEF
---
Summary of Applicable Interest Rates and Other Terms of the Bonds The Bank Proposed Forms of Approving Opinions of Bond Counsel

In connection with this offering, the Underwriters may overallot or effect transactions that stabilize or maintain the market price of the Bonds at a level above that which might otherwise prevail in the open market. Such stabilizing, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.

The Bonds are exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 and from registration under the securities laws of the State of Ohio. No dealer, broker, salesman or other person has been authorized by the Commission, the University or the Underwriters to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the Bonds, other than those contained in this Offering Circular, and, if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Commission, the University or the Underwriters. This Offering Circular does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of the Bonds by any person in any state, possession or territory, in which it is unlawful for such person to make such offer, solicitation or sale. The information contained herein has been obtained from the Commission (with respect to the Commission), the University, the Bank, DTC and other sources that are believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness, and is not to be construed as a representation of the Underwriters. The information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice, and neither the delivery of this Offering Circular nor any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the parties referred to above or any related parties since the date hereof. This Offering Circular is not to be construed as an agreement or contract with the Commission. Capitalized terms used in this Offering Circular and not otherwise defined have the meanings set forth in “CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS AND SUMMARY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE TRUST AGREEMENTS, THE LEASES AND THE TAX AGREEMENTS” in APPENDIX C. All quotations from summaries and explanations of provisions of law and documents herein do not purport to be complete, and reference is made to such laws and documents for full and complete statements of their provisions.

This Offering Circular has been prepared in connection with the original offering for sale of the Bonds.
FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE RESIDENTS
In making an investment decision investors must rely on their own examination of the University and the terms of the offering, including the merits and risks involved. These securities have not been recommended by any Federal or state securities commission or regulatory authority. Furthermore, the foregoing authorities have not confirmed the accuracy or determined the adequacy of this document. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

$100,000,000
STATE OF OHIO
(OHIO HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITY COMMISSION)
HIGHER EDUCATIONAL FACILITY REVENUE BONDS
(CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY 2002 PROJECT)

$64,875,000 Series A

(Variable Rate)

$35,125,000 Series B

(Fixed Rate)

INTRODUCTION

This Offering Circular, including the cover page, the table of contents and the Appendices, is provided to furnish information in connection with the issuance by the Ohio Higher Educational Facility Commission (the “Commission”) of $100,000,000 State of Ohio Higher Educational Facility Revenue Bonds (Case Western Reserve University 2002 Project), Series A and Series B (the “Series A Bonds” and the “Series B Bonds,” respectively, and, collectively, the “Bonds”), consisting of Series A Bonds in the principal amount of $64,875,000 and Series B Bonds in the principal amount of $35,125,000. The Series A Bonds are being issued pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2002 (the “Series A Trust Agreement”), between the Commission and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The Series B Bonds are being issued pursuant to a Trust Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2002 (the “Series B Trust Agreement”), between the Commission and the Trustee. The Series A Bonds will be issued for the purpose of paying costs of certain educational facilities of Case Western Reserve University (the “Series A Project”), costs of issuance of the Series A Bonds and for such other uses as are permitted under the Series A Lease (as defined below) and Chapter 3377 of the Ohio Revised Code (the “Act”). The Series B Bonds will be issued for the purpose of paying costs of certain educational facilities of Case Western Reserve University (the “Series B Project”), costs of issuance of the Series B Bonds and for such other uses as are permitted under the Series B Lease (as defined below) and the Act. See “THE PROJECTS AND USE OF PROCEEDS” herein for a more complete description of the Projects. The Series A Project and the Series B Project will each consist of that portion of the Projects financed through the issuance of the Series A Bonds and the Series B Bonds, respectively.

The Bonds will be dated and mature as set forth on the inside cover page. The Bonds will be subject to redemption prior to maturity as described herein under “THE BONDS – Description of the Series A Bonds – Redemption” and “– Description of the Series B Bonds – Redemption.”

All of the educational facilities constituting the Series A Project and the Series B Project (collectively, the
“Projects”) are located on the Case Western Reserve University (the “University”) campus in Cleveland, Ohio. The Series A Project will be leased by the University to the Commission under the Base Lease, dated as of May 15, 2002 relating to the Series A Bonds (the “Series A Base Lease”). The Series B Project will be leased by the University to the Commission under the Base Lease, dated as of May 15, 2002 relating to the Series B Bonds (the “Series B Base Lease”). The Series A Project will be leased by the Commission to the University pursuant to the Lease, dated as of May 15, 2002, between the Commission and the University relating to the Series A Bonds (the “Series A Lease”). The Series B Project will be leased by the Commission to the University pursuant to the Lease, dated as of May 15, 2002, between the Commission and the University relating to the Series B Bonds (the “Series B Lease”). The University is required by the Series A Lease and the Series B Lease (collectively, the “Leases”) to make payments equal to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the respective series of Bonds, whether at maturity, upon acceleration or upon redemption (the “Bond Service Charges”). Bond Service Charges on the Series A Bonds will be required to be made by the University as rental payments (the “Series A Rental Payments”) under the Series A Lease. Bond Service Charges on the Series B Bonds will be required to be made by the University as rental payments (the “Series B Rental Payments”) under the Series B Lease. In the Leases, the University has agreed to purchase the Commission’s interest in the Projects after all of the Bond Service Charges have been paid.

1
Upon the issuance of the Series A Bonds, the University, the Trustee and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen
Girozentrale, acting through its New York Branch (the “Bank”), will enter into a Standby Bond Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2002 (the “Initial Liquidity Facility”), pursuant to which the Bank will agree, in certain circumstances, to purchase the Series A Bonds bearing interest at a Daily Rate or a Weekly Rate that are tendered or deemed tendered by the owners thereof for purchase pursuant to the Series A Trust Agreement and not remarketed by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, as remarketing agent (the “Remarketing Agent”). The Initial Liquidity Facility expires on June 3, 2003, unless extended or terminated in accordance with its terms. The term “Liquidity Provider” in this Offering Circular refers to the Bank during the period that the Initial Liquidity Facility is in effect. The Liquidity Facility (as defined below) does not secure payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Series A Bonds. See “THE BONDS – Description of the Series A Bonds – Liquidity Facility” herein.

Under certain circumstances described in the Series A Trust Agreement, the Initial Liquidity Facility may be replaced by an alternate liquidity facility (such as a letter of credit, a line of credit or a bond purchase agreement) supporting payment of the purchase price of tendered or deemed tendered Series A Bonds (an “Alternate Liquidity Facility”). The delivery of an Alternate Liquidity Facility will result in the mandatory tender of the Series A Bonds, unless each Rating Service confirms in writing that the then current rating on the Series A Bonds will not be reduced or withdrawn as the result of the delivery of such Alternate Liquidity Facility. The Initial Liquidity Facility and any Alternate Liquidity Facility are referred to collectively in this Offering Circular as the “Liquidity Facility.” Under certain circumstances described in the Series A Trust Agreement, the University may discontinue use of a Liquidity Facility. See “THE BONDS – Description of the Series A Bonds – Mandatory Tender” and “– Alternate Liquidity Facilities.”

The Bonds are special obligations of the State of Ohio (the “State”) and the Bond Service Charges on the Bonds will be payable from revenues to be derived by the Commission from its ownership of the Projects, including the Series A Rental Payments with respect to the Series A Bonds, the Series B Rental Payments with respect to the Series B Bonds and certain other amounts, all as provided in the Series A Lease, the Series B Lease, the Series A Trust Agreement and the Series B Trust Agreement and as hereinafter described under “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT.”

The Series A Bonds are secured by the Series A Trust Agreement, which grants to the Trustee a security interest in the Series A Revenues as described herein under “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT.” The Series A Bonds are further secured by the Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2002, between the University and the Trustee relating to the Series A Bonds (the “Series A Guaranty”) by which the University unconditionally guarantees the payment of the Bond Service Charges on the Series A Bonds as described herein under “THE GUARANTIES.”

The Series B Bonds are secured by the Series B Trust Agreement, which grants to the Trustee a security interest in the Series B Revenues as described herein under “SECURITY AND SOURCES OF PAYMENT.” The Series B Bonds are further secured by the Guaranty Agreement, dated as of May 15, 2002, between the University and the Trustee relating to the Series B Bonds (the “Series B Guaranty”) by which the University unconditionally guarantees the payment of the Bond Service Charges on the Series B Bonds as described herein under “THE GUARANTIES.”

Brief descriptions of the Commission, the University, the Projects, the Bonds, the Leases, the Series A
Trust Agreement and the Series B Trust Agreement (collectively, the “Trust Agreements”), and the Series A Guaranty and the Series B Guaranty (collectively, the “Guaranties”) are included in this Offering Circular. The descriptions herein of the Bonds, the Leases, the Trust Agreements and the Guaranties are qualified in their entirety by reference to each such document. The description of the University consists of certain information and data provided by it (as set forth in Appendix A) and certain of its audited consolidated financial statements (as set forth in Appendix B). All descriptions are further qualified in their entirety by reference to laws and principles of equity relating to or affecting generally the enforcement of creditors’ rights. Copies of the above described documents are available for inspection during the initial offering period at the principal office of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, 1221 Avenue of the Americas, 30th Floor, New York, New York 10020, the principal office

Recommended publications
  • After a Sold-Out Run at East to Edinburgh, the WAITING GAME Returns to 59E59 Theaters

    After a Sold-Out Run at East to Edinburgh, the WAITING GAME Returns to 59E59 Theaters

    After a sold-out run at East to Edinburgh, THE WAITING GAME returns to 59E59 Theaters New York, New York January 2, 2019 —59E59 Theaters (Val Day, Artistic Director; Brian Beirne, Managing Director) is thrilled to welcome THE WAITING GAME, written by Charles Gershman and directed by Nathan Wright. Produced by Snowy Owl, THE WAITING GAME begins performances on Wednesday, February 6 for a limited engagement through Sunday, February 23. Press Opening is Tuesday, February 12 at 7:30 PM. The performance schedule is Tuesday – Saturday at 7:30 PM; and Sunday at 2:30 PM. Performances are at 59E59 Theaters (59 East 59th Street, between Park and Madison). Single tickets are $25 ($20 for 59E59 Members). Tickets are available by calling the 59E59 Box Office on 646-892-7999 or by visiting www.59e59.org. Sam's in a coma. Paolo's doing his best. When Geoff reveals a secret, reality and fantasy blur. This NYC premiere from critically acclaimed Snowy Owl follows a sold-out, award-winning run in the Edinburgh Fringe (Best Overseas Play, Derek Awards) and explores relationships in the digital age. After selling out at 59E59 Theaters’ East to Edinburgh festival, THE WAITING GAME went on to the 2017 Edinburgh Fringe where it was called "one of the Top 5 LGBTQ Shows to see in the Edinburgh Fringe" by Huffington Post. The cast features Joshua Bouchard (Séance on a Wet Afternoon at Lincoln Center/New York City Opera); Julian Joseph (Bluebloods on CBS); Ibsen Santos (Inside The Wild Heart with Group.BR); and Marc Sinoway (LOGO’s Hunting Season).
  • Parziale Diss FINAL Aug 7 13

    Parziale Diss FINAL Aug 7 13

    Representations of Trauma in Contemporary American Literature and Film: Moving from Erasure to Creative Transformation Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Parziale, Amy Elizabeth Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 13:06:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/301676 REPRESENTATIONS OF TRAUMA IN CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN LITERATURE AND FILM: MOVING FROM ERASURE TO CREATIVE TRANSFORMATION by Amy Elizabeth Parziale _____________________ Copyright © Amy Elizabeth Parziale 2013 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2013 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Amy Parziale entitled Representations of Trauma in Contemporary American Literature and Film: Moving from Erasure to Creative Transformation and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________________________________________________Date: 4/5/2013 Susan White ___________________________________________________________Date: 4/5/2013 Sandra Soto ___________________________________________________________Date: 4/5/2013 Charles Scruggs Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
  • 2020-22 GRADUATE CATALOG | Eastern New Mexico University

    2020-22 GRADUATE CATALOG | Eastern New Mexico University

    2020-22 TABLE OF CONTENTS University Notices..................................................................................................................2 About Eastern New Mexico University ...........................................................................3 About the Graduate School of ENMU ...............................................................................4 ENMU Academic Regulations And Procedures ........................................................... 5 Program Admission .............................................................................................................7 International Student Admission ...............................................................................8 Degree and Non-Degree Classification ......................................................................9 FERPA ................................................................................................................................. 10 Graduate Catalog Graduate Program Academic Regulations and Procedures ......................................................11 Thesis and Non-Thesis Plan of Study ......................................................................11 Graduation ..........................................................................................................................17 Graduate Assistantships ...............................................................................................17 Tuition and Fees ...................................................................................................................
  • Space Opera 2005…………………………..……………………

    Space Opera 2005…………………………..……………………

    presents Music and Libretto by David Bass Directed by David Bass and Amanda Jack Choreography by Deborah Mason The King Open School Cambridge, Massachusetts March 12, 13, 19, and 20, 2005 2 55 somewheresomewhere in somerville, in thereSomer- is a store that somewhere claims to in have somerville, over a thousandthere is a beersstore ville, in that stock, claims therehard to tohave find isover kegs, a a thousandstore a world-wide beers selection that in stock, claims of hard wines, to find and to kegs, liquor have a world-widefor any over party. selection of wines, and liquor for any party. thea musicthousand is always fresh, beers and they’re open the music is always fresh, and they’re open seven in stock,days a week. hard where to is this find elusive store?seven days davis a week.square. where what is is this the elusive name kegs, store? davis a world square. what-wide is the name of of this this intoxicating intoxicating paradise?paradise? selection DOWNTOWN WINE of & SPIRITS. wines, 225 elmand st. DOWNTOWN WINE & SPIRITS. 225 elm st. “we’re not your average package store.” “we’re “we’re not yournot average your package average store.” 54 3 58 58 33 Contents Space Opera 2005…………………………..…………………….. 11 Mission Statement Synopsis………………………………………………………………. 12 The North Cambridge Family Opera Company began as an Song List………………………………………………………….. 14-15 informal group of children and adults who gathered to per- form at the NoCA (North Cambridge All Arts) open studios Cast Lists, First Weekend……………………………………..16-18 weekend in May 1999. We found the experience of singing opera to be a unique way to strengthen families, to build Cast Lists, Second Weekend………….…..………………...20-22 friendships, and to enhance relationships between genera- tions.
  • Xerox University Microfilms

    Xerox University Microfilms

    SKEPTICISM AND DOCTRINE IN THE WORKS OF CYRANO DE BERGERAC (1619--1655) Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Johnson, Charles Richard, 1927- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 06:30:47 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/288336 INFORMATION TC USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material.
  • THE ETHICAL DILEMMA of SCIENCE and OTHER WRITINGS the Rockefeller Institute Press

    THE ETHICAL DILEMMA of SCIENCE and OTHER WRITINGS the Rockefeller Institute Press

    THE ETHICAL DILEMMA OF SCIENCE AND OTHER WRITINGS The Rockefeller Institute Press IN ASSOCIATION WITH OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW YORK 1960 @ 1960 BY THE ROCKEFELLER INSTITUTE PRESS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY THE ROCKEFELLER INSTITUTE PRESS IN ASSOCIATION WITH OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number 60-13207 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE The Ethical Dilemma of Science Living mechanism 5 The present tendencies and the future compass of physiological science 7 Experiments on frogs and men 24 Scepticism and faith 39 Science, national and international, and the basis of co-operation 45 The use and misuse of science in government 57 Science in Parliament 67 The ethical dilemma of science 72 Science and witchcraft, or, the nature of a university 90 CHAPTER TWO Trailing One's Coat Enemies of knowledge 105 The University of London Council for Psychical Investigation 118 "Hypothecate" versus "Assume" 120 Pharmacy and Medicines Bill (House of Commons) 121 The social sciences 12 5 The useful guinea-pig 127 The Pure Politician 129 Mugwumps 131 The Communists' new weapon- germ warfare 132 Independence in publication 135 ~ CONTENTS CHAPTER THREE About People Bertram Hopkinson 1 39 Hartley Lupton 142 Willem Einthoven 144 The Donnan-Hill Effect (The Mystery of Life) 148 F. W. Lamb 156 Another Englishman's "Thank you" 159 Ivan P. Pavlov 160 E. D. Adrian in the Chair of Physiology at Cambridge 165 Louis Lapicque 168 E. J. Allen 171 William Hartree 173 R. H. Fowler 179 Joseph Barcroft 180 Sir Henry Dale, the Chairman of the Science Committee of the British Council 184 August Krogh 187 Otto Meyerhof 192 Hans Sloane 195 On A.
  • Measuring in Absentia Removal in Immigration Court

    Measuring in Absentia Removal in Immigration Court

    UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW Founded 1852 Formerly AMERICAN LAW REGISTER © 2020 University of Pennsylvania Law Review VOL. 168 MARCH 2020 NO. 4 ARTICLE MEASURING IN ABSENTIA REMOVAL IN IMMIGRATION COURT INGRID EAGLY† & STEVEN SHAFER†† No academic study has empirically analyzed decisions by United States immigration judges to deport noncitizens without first providing them a day in court, a procedure known as in absentia removal. Yet bold assertions by members of the current † Professor of Law, UCLA School of Law. For helpful feedback and comments, the authors thank Jeffrey Chase, Catherine Kim, Kennji Kizuka, Katy Lewis, Sue Long, Peter Margulies, Michelle Mendez, Jaya Ramji-Nogales, Ben Nyblade, Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, Emily Ryo, Philip Schrag, Amy Semet, and participants in the UCLA Criminal Justice Faculty Workshop. In addition, we recognize Jodi Kruger, Sasha Novis, and Brittany Roberts for their excellent research assistance, and the editors at the University of Pennsylvania Law Review for their superb editorial support. †† Managing Attorney, Esperanza Immigrant Rights Project and Research Associate, UCLA School of Law Empirical Research Group. (817) 818 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol. 168: 817 presidential administration that immigrants “never” appear in court drive central policy decisions on immigration enforcement, including growing the immigration detention system, limiting access to asylum, and building a border wall. By reviewing immigration court data from 2008 to 2018 made publicly available by the Executive Office of Immigration Review, this Article provides the first-ever independent analysis of in absentia removal orders. Contrary to claims that all immigrants abscond, our data-driven analysis reveals that 88% of all immigrants in immigration court with completed or pending removal cases over the past eleven years attended all of their court hearings.
  • Questionnaire Concerning Judgments in Absentia and the Possibility of Retrial

    Questionnaire Concerning Judgments in Absentia and the Possibility of Retrial

    PC-OC (2013) 01 Rev.3 Bil. Strasbourg, 28/04/2014 [PC-OC/Docs 2013/ PC-OC(2013)01 Rev.3 Bil.] www.coe.int/tcj EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMITE EUROPEEN POUR LES PROBLEMES CRIMINELS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS ON CO-OPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PC-OC) COMITE D'EXPERTS SUR LE FONCTIONNEMENT DES CONVENTIONS EUROPEENNES SUR LA COOPERATION DANS LE DOMAINE PENAL (PC-OC) Questionnaire concerning judgments in absentia and the possibility of retrial Summary and Compilation of Replies Questionnaire concernant les jugements par défaut et la possibilité d'être rejugé Résumé et compilation des réponses Replies received from: Albania, Armenia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Malta, the Republic of Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom PC-OC (2013) 01 Rev.3 Bil. Contents/ Table des matières Introduction (English).......................................................................................................................4 Summary of replies to the questionnaire.........................................................................................6 Introduction (français) ....................................................................................................................11
  • “Global Dissident”: Georgi Markov As a Cold War Playwright and Exile

    “Global Dissident”: Georgi Markov As a Cold War Playwright and Exile

    STUDIA HISTORICA GEDANENSIA TOM V (2014) Vessela S. Warner (University of Alabama at Birmingham) “Global Dissident”: Georgi Markov as a Cold War Playwright and Exile Bulgarian writer Georgi Markov was undeniably one of the most controversial and internationally known Cold War dissidents and, after 1969, an expatriate‑turned‑exile.1 Although some of his literary works were censored during the time of political stagnation and tightened ideological control, he left his country as a legal tourist and privileged member of the Bulgarian intellectual elite. Under the pressure exercised on him by conservative statesmen and policing critics, the writer ultimately sought refuge in the West. Markov’s radio programs aired successfully on BBC and Deutsche Welle, but it was the chapters of his memoir Zadochni Reportazhi za Bulgaria (Correspondence on Bulgaria in Absentia),2 broadcasted on Radio Free Europe, which presented the most insightful and incriminatory account on Bulgarian dictatorial communism and attracted millions of listeners. This extensive political memoir ultimately led to the author’s assassination in London, widely known as the “Bulgarian umbrella murder”. Although Markov’s death and its long and complicated investigation have been extensively covered in journal articles, film documentaries, and spy histories,3 Markov’s literary work is less studied even in his own country, 1 The main difference between “expatriates” and “exiles,” as pointed by John Neubauer, is that the former leave their countries without being “existentially endangered [and] in principle they can return any time they want to”. See John Neubauer, Borbála Zsuzsanna Török, eds., The Exile and Return of Writers from East‑Central Europe.
  • Number 6 SMITHSONIAN ANNALS of FLIGHT SMITHSONIAN AIR

    Number 6 SMITHSONIAN ANNALS of FLIGHT SMITHSONIAN AIR

    Number 6 SMITHSONIAN ANNALS OF FLIGHT SMITHSONIAN AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti­ tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge. This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com­ mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of profes­ sional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These publications are distributed by subscription to libraries, laboratories, and other in­ terested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available. S. DILLON RIPLEY Secretary Smithsonian Institution Langley's Aero Engine of 1903 Charles M.
  • Danceworks in Absentia

    Danceworks in Absentia

    “Moore is a vivid daring creator” John Kendle, Uptown Magazine “Moore's text is crisp, poetic, elegant and evocative; her painting of character is swift and deep.” Beverely Daurio, Evidance DANCEWORKS PRESENTS IN ABSENTIA PRODUCED BY JDDANCE ​ CHOREOGRAPHY, CONCEPT, AND DIRECTION BY SHARON B. MOORE PERFORMERS JORDANA DEVEAU, JESSE DELL, NOAH BLATT, YIMING CAI, HILARY KNEE, JAKE RAMOS AND KATHIA WITTENBORN NOVEMBER 21 – 23, 2019 AT HARBOURFRONT CENTRE THEATRE Toronto, ON (October 24, 2019) – Boldly interweaving dance, puppetry, set, music, lights, and live-action video design, DanceWorks is proud to present IN ABSENTIA, a stunning new multimedia work produced ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ by Toronto-based collective JDdance. Boasting choreography and direction by Sharon B. Moore, as well ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ as performances by Jesse Dell and Jordana Deveau, alongside five of Toronto’s most exhilarating ​ ​ ​ ​ emerging dance artists, this original production is five years in the making and will celebrate its World Premiere at Harbourfront Centre Theatre, November 21-23, 2019. ​ ​ A modern day fantasy, IN ABSENTIA celebrates the unexpected beauty that blossoms in the aftermath of ​ ​ calamity. Two humans, lost, traverse an ever-shifting landscape. Fragile and torrential, vivid and fantastical, the journey spins a prophetic dream world which helps them divine the consequences and potentials of living in a harrowing time. “With complex design and over 1000 pounds of raw cardboard material on-stage, IN ABSENTIA is riddled ​ ​ with risk. Humorous and magical, threatening and horrifying, movement reshapes the weight of the world around us and our own human part in it. Whether navigating through a house of mirrors, escaping the poisonous needles of a porcupine or surrendering to the premonitions of two tiny fortune- telling skeletons, IN ABSENTIA is a visual journey through movement and design.” Sharon B.
  • University Report

    University Report

    September 15,1971 \ UNIVERSITY- REPORT A NEWSLETTER FOR THE STAFF OF THE TWIN CitiES CAMpti!, UNIYEISIJY OF MINN£10TA Nine-Month Academic Salaries Frozen II Salaries have been frozen for Univer­ Unless the 1971-72 salary rate was in checks, but adjustments will be made at sity faculty members on nine-month effect for an employee before the freeze, a subsequent payroll date and will be contracts who hold the same rank and or unless he has been assigned "new and effective Sept. 16. I title as in 1970-71. greater responsibility" in a new position, For a faculty member who has been ~ Faculty members with twelve-month his salary has been frozen at the rate promoted, the new salary must not appointments received increases before effective before the freeze. exceed the average salary for 1970-71 for the national wage-price freeze began Aug. the rank to which he has been promoted 15. Slightly more than half of the faculty Increases will be reflected on Sept. 30 in his department. For this reason, are on nine-month contracts. paychecks for nine-month faculty increases may differ from those earlier In a memo issued Sept. 1 and distri­ members who have moved to positions approved by the Regents. buted to all staff members, University with new titles and increased responsibili­ Research assistants, teaching assistants, President Malcolm Moos said: ties-for example, an associate professor teaching associates, and administrative "I recognize that our faculty has been who has moved to associate professor and fellows are exempt from the freeze. Fixed seriously affected by the impact of the director.