Jacques Maritain and Alasdair Macintyre on Human Rights

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jacques Maritain and Alasdair Macintyre on Human Rights THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Jacques Maritain and Alasdair MacIntyre on Human Rights A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Philosophy Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Carrie Rose Stibora Washington, D.C. 2013 Jacques Maritain and Alasdair MacIntyre on Human Rights Carrie Rose Stibora, Ph.D. Director: V. Bradley Lewis, Ph.D. This dissertation is an examination of the two divergent positions on human rights taken by prominent Catholic and Thomist philosophers Jacques Maritain and Alasdair MacIntyre. Maritain and MacIntyre, although having traveled similar paths, which included atheism, Marxism, anti-liberalism, seemingly have diametrically opposed position on the use of human rights. Maritain's work, including engagement with the drafting of the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights (1948), redefined human rights as an extension of the natural law tradition rooted in the work of Thomas Aquinas. Maritain's unique definition of rights included such notions as personalism, the common good, justice and had a basis in classical metaphysics. MacIntyre, on the other hand, rejects human rights because of their liberal provenance, maintaining that rights language is a necessary band-aid to motivate individuals to help those less fortunate in society where community, the common good and family have been significantly weakened because of liberalism. Starting with John XXIII and the Second Vatican Council up through Benedict XVI, Maritain's articulation of rights influenced several popes. It has become the stock language of the Catholic Church, despite centuries of pontiffs rebuking liberalism and rights language. With the understanding that rights can in fact be viewed as an extension of the natural law, rights language is now the preferred mode of speaking within the Church about the common good and human dignity. Delving deeper into the notion of tradition constituted rationality, MacIntyre sees the importance of being a part of a tradition for practical rationality. Having allied himself to Catholicism and the tradition of Thomistic Aristotelianism, MacIntyre emphasizes the importance of operating within the tradition, despite whatever deficiencies it may have. As a result, he abandons his own criticisms of human rights, as evidenced in two advanced stages of his career: 1) one of relative silence on the subject, engaging the word choice instead of rights; and 2) coming around to a position where he recognizes that rights do in fact exist, but need to be couched within an understanding of the common good, justice, and generosity – elements that mimic Maritain's own articulation and that of the Catholic Church. This dissertation by Carrie Rose Stibora fulfills the dissertation requirement for the doctoral degree in Philosophy approved by V. Bradley Lewis, Ph.D., as Director, and by Gregory T. Doolan, Ph.D., and Angela McKay Knobel, Ph.D. as Readers. V. Bradley Lewis, Ph.D., Director Gregory T. Doolan, Ph.D., Reader Angela McKay Knobel, Ph.D., Reader ii For Susan Louise Gress-Andrews and Joseph Allen Stibora, Ph.D. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1 1. WHY RIGHTS NOW...............................................................................................................1 2. WHY MARITAIN AND MACINTYRE? ......................................................................................2 3. CONNECTIONS......................................................................................................................4 4. METHOD..............................................................................................................................8 5. LAYOUT OF THE CHAPTERS ..................................................................................................9 6. WHICH RIGHTS?.................................................................................................................12 7. POPE LEO XIII'S INFLUENCE ...............................................................................................14 CHAPTER ONE: MARITAIN'S PRE-MODERN AND MODERN MÉLANGE ..............24 1. MARITAIN PRIOR TO RIGHTS ..............................................................................................25 2. MARITAIN'S EMBRACE OF RIGHTS ......................................................................................34 3. SEA CHANGE IN ECCLESIASTICAL LANGUAGE.....................................................................43 4. WHO WAS FIRST? PIUS XI OR MARITAIN?..........................................................................52 5. LIBERAL, BUT… ................................................................................................................55 6. CONCLUSION .....................................................................................................................57 CHAPTER TWO: REDEFINING RIGHTS - THE KEY ELEMENTS..............................59 PART I – CHRISTIAN HUMANISM...........................................................................................60 1. BIG PICTURE OF MARITAIN'S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY .........................................................60 2. PERSONALISM ....................................................................................................................62 3. THE COMMON GOOD..........................................................................................................74 4. NATURAL LAW ..................................................................................................................78 PART II - DEFINITION OF RIGHTS ..........................................................................................81 1. IUS.....................................................................................................................................84 2. NATURAL LAW IN THE WORKING DEFINITION.....................................................................86 3. ETERNAL LAW ...................................................................................................................91 4. CONCLUSION .....................................................................................................................93 CHAPTER THREE: MARITAIN'S CRITICS ....................................................................94 1. LIBERAL RIGHTS VS. CATHOLIC THOUGHT..........................................................................94 2. THE CRISIS AND CRITICS OF INTEGRAL HUMANISM ...............................................................99 3. THOMAS'S NATURAL LAW ................................................................................................112 4. TOO THEOLOGICAL ..........................................................................................................120 5. TOO PHILOSOPHICAL? ......................................................................................................126 6. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................130 CHAPTER FOUR: MARITAIN AND THE CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING TRADITION .........................................................................................................................131 1. SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL AND POPE PAUL VI ...............................................................132 2. JOHN PAUL II (1978 - 2005).............................................................................................142 iv 3. BENEDICT XVI (2005 - 2013) ..........................................................................................155 4. BEYOND THE PAPACY ......................................................................................................158 5. THE PEASANT'S FALLOUT .................................................................................................160 6. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................165 CHAPTER FIVE: MACINTYRE'S NARRATIVE QUEST..............................................167 1. TRIPARTIONED CAREER....................................................................................................170 2. STAGE I - MARX (1946 - 1971) ........................................................................................172 3. INTERLOCKING PIECES FROM MARX .................................................................................181 4. ANTI-LIBERALISM, ANTI-CAPITALISM ..............................................................................182 5. HISTORICIZING MAN ........................................................................................................187 6. PRACTICE AND THEORY....................................................................................................188 7. STAGE II ARISTOTLE AND AFTER VIRTUE (1971 - 1984).....................................................191 8. VIRTUE AND PRACTICES ...................................................................................................196 9. FROM PRACTICES TO NARRATIVE QUEST ..........................................................................202 10. LIVING AND DEAD TRADITIONS ......................................................................................205 11. STAGE III THOMISM AND TRADITION (1984 - )................................................................207
Recommended publications
  • One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards a Symposium
    One Hundred Years of Thomism Aeterni Patris and Afterwards A Symposium Edited By Victor B. Brezik, C.S.B, CENTER FOR THOMISTIC STUDIES University of St. Thomas Houston, Texas 77006 ~ NIHIL OBSTAT: ReverendJamesK. Contents Farge, C.S.B. Censor Deputatus INTRODUCTION . 1 IMPRIMATUR: LOOKING AT THE PAST . 5 Most Reverend John L. Morkovsky, S.T.D. A Remembrance Of Pope Leo XIII: The Encyclical Aeterni Patris, Leonard E. Boyle,O.P. 7 Bishop of Galveston-Houston Commentary, James A. Weisheipl, O.P. ..23 January 6, 1981 The Legacy Of Etienne Gilson, Armand A. Maurer,C.S.B . .28 The Legacy Of Jacques Maritain, Christian Philosopher, First Printing: April 1981 Donald A. Gallagher. .45 LOOKING AT THE PRESENT. .61 Copyright©1981 by The Center For Thomistic Studies Reflections On Christian Philosophy, All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or Ralph McInerny . .63 reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written Thomism And Today's Crisis In Moral Values, Michael permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in Bertram Crowe . .74 critical articles and reviews. For information, write to The Transcendental Thomism, A Critical Assessment, Center For Thomistic Studies, 3812 Montrose Boulevard, Robert J. Henle, S.J. 90 Houston, Texas 77006. LOOKING AT THE FUTURE. .117 Library of Congress catalog card number: 80-70377 Can St. Thomas Speak To The Modem World?, Leo Sweeney, S.J. .119 The Future Of Thomistic Metaphysics, ISBN 0-9605456-0-3 Joseph Owens, C.Ss.R. .142 EPILOGUE. .163 The New Center And The Intellectualism Of St. Thomas, Printed in the United States of America Vernon J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Secular Contract,A Sacred Calling Jacques Maritain and John Dewey
    A Secular Contract,A Sacred Calling Jacques Maritain and John Dewey on Education:A Reconsideration 247 by Gerald L. Gutek acques Maritain and John Dewey were two of the towering figures in philosophy of education. Maritain led an international revival of JAristotelian and Thomist philosophies known as Integral Humanism. Dewey,a founding figure of Pragmatism,exercised a significant influence on American education. Originating in very different philosophical set- tings, their ideas on education tend to represent polar opposites. An analysis of the divergent insights on education presented by Maritain and Dewey can help educators step back and reflect on their work. These two thinkers’ voices have a relevance that continues to speak to us about the problems of education. Philosophical and Theoretical Orientation To discuss Maritain and Dewey on education,we consider the origin of their ideas in different philosophical and theoretical contexts. Maritain’s concepts of universal truth and purposeful human life origi- nate in the Aristotelian and Thomist traditions, especially their meta- physics. Maritain espouses Aristotle’s metaphysics, which sees objective reality as operating according to universal natural laws. He endorses Aristotle’s epistemology that human beings have the potentiality to acquire knowledge about this reality by forming concepts through a twofold process of sensation and abstraction. Aristotle’s view of knowl- edge and knowing differs from Plato’s theory of reminiscence, in which ideas existing latently in the mind are brought to consciousness. True to his Aristotelian origin, Maritain consistently argues that human beings’ powers of intellect endow them with the potential of rationality. Although Maritain’s philosophy of education rests on Aristotle’s meta- physics, Dewey rejects metaphysics as purely speculative and empirical- ly unverifiable.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Mango MACINTYRE's GILSONIAN PREFERENCE
    Studia Gilsoniana 2 (2013): 21-32 | ISSN 2300-0066 Peter Mango Institute for the Psychological Sciences Arlington, Virginia, USA MACINTYRE’S GILSONIAN PREFERENCE “No philosopher can know that he is a Thomist unless he also be an historian.” - Étienne Gilson Étienne Gilson claimed more people were Thomist because they were Catholic than became Catholic because they were first Thomist. However true, the latter class is usually more interesting. Instances include Mortimer Adler, Jacques Maritain, Walker Percy – and Alasdair MacIn- tyre. In 1988 Alasdair MacIntyre had announced his preference for Thomism as a philosophical tradition after a famously long and varied trajectory. The trajectory included stretches as: an Oxford tutor in classics; a convinced Barthian; an analytic thinker co-publishing with Anthony Flew; a student of Hegel; a New Left Marxist; a student of medieval lan- guages (e.g., Old Norse); a student of phenomenology and psychoanalysis, respectively; an anthropological sociologist influenced by Franz Steiner, Mary Douglas, and Evans-Pritchard; a neo-Aristotelian; and someone dis- playing a persistent interest in Wittgenstein. By the time he “landed” over two decades ago, however, MacIntyre was not a product of mere faddism. The themes MacIntyre presupposes in his work have occupied him throughout his professional career. Nor has he abandoned all the stages listed above (indeed he retains the last five synthetically). A Thomist once remarked to me that it seemed, given his late arri- val, MacIntyre was a “baby” as far as Thomism is concerned. Justly noted 22 Peter Mango or not, I pointed out MacIntyre is not a “baby” as far as philosophy is con- cerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Theme 4 of Catholic Social Teaching
    THEME 4 OF CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING: OPTION FOR THE POOR AND VULNERABLE A basic moral test is how our most vulnerable members are faring. In a society marred by deepening divisions between rich and poor, our tradition recalls the story of the Last Judgment (Mt. 25: 31-46) and instructs us to put the needs of the poor and vulnerable first. Scripture . Exodus 22:20-26 You shall not oppress the poor or vulnerable. God will hear their cry. Leviticus 19:9-10 A portion of the harvest is set aside for the poor and the stranger. Job 34:20-28 The Lord hears the cry of the poor. Proverbs 31:8-9 Speak out in defense of the poor. Sirach 4:1-10 Don’t delay giving to those in need. Isaiah 25:4-5 God is a refuge for the poor. Isaiah 58:5-7 True worship is to work for justice and care for the poor and oppressed. Matthew 25:34-40 What you do for the least among you, you do for Jesus. Luke 4:16-21 Jesus proclaims his mission: to bring good news to the poor and oppressed. Luke 6:20-23 Blessed are the poor, theirs is the kingdom of God. 1 John 3:17-18 How does God’s love abide in anyone who has the world’s good and sees one in need and refuses to help? . 2 Corinthians 8: 7,9,13 Exhorts Christians to excel in grace of giving Tradition Still, when there is question of defending the rights of individuals, the poor and badly off have a claim to especial consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • “SLOVENIAN GENEALOGY MONTH” at the Slovenian Genealogy Society International Research Library Located Within the Slovenian Museum and Archives 6407 St
    Published September 3, 2010 E-mail: info@clevelandslovenian.com Est. MMVII ANNOUNCING SEPTEMBER, 2010 AS “SLOVENIAN GENEALOGY MONTH” at the Slovenian Genealogy Society International Research Library located within the Slovenian Museum and Archives 6407 St. Clair Avenue Cleveland, OH 44103 GRAND OPENING Saturday, September 4, 2010 1 – 4 p.m. AN EXHIBITION OF “FAMILY GENEALOGY TREES FROM SLOVENIA” A very creative collection of family trees prepared by members of the Slovenian Genealogy Society of Slovenia Free genealogy chart informational handout given to all attendees DAYS/HOURS OF OPERATION: Beginning Saturday, September 4, 2010 (as noted above) and every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday in September from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m with presentations given as follows: PRESENTIONS: Saturday, September 11, 2010—1 p.m. “RESEARCHING YOUR SLOVENIAN ANCESTORS IN SLOVENIA” Branka Lapajne, Ph.D. -- Famous Slovenian Genealogist and Historian from Canada Tuesday, September 14, 7:00 p.m., 2010 -- Regular Meeting of Ohio SGSI Chapter “SLOVENIAN GENEALOGY RESOURCES IN GREATER CLEVELAND” Ed Oshaben, President, Ohio SGSI Chapter Saturday, September 18, 2010, 1 p.m. “UNLOCKING YOUR SLOVENIAN HERITAGE” Virginia Marinko Pinkava, SGSI Member and Genealogist Tuesday, September 21, 2010, 7:00 p.m. “SLOVENIAN FOODS AT THE HEART OF OUR ETHNICITY“ Sylvia Onusic, Ph.D., Traditional/Natural Foods Nutritionist Saturday, September 25, 2010, 1 p.m. “JUMPING THROUGH HOOPS—IMMIGRATING IN THE 1900s vs. TODAY” Linda Silakoski, Immigration Attorney Phil Hrvatin Senior Editor ClevelandSlovenian.com Tim Percic Creative Design Published September 3, 2010 E-mail: info@clevelandslovenian.com Est. MMVII ORAL HISTORY PRESERVATION PROGRAM: Become part of our Oral History Preservation Program by recording your life story.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr
    High School: Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Grade: High School-- Course 2, Course 4, Course 5, Course 6, and Option C. “This is the original meaning of Doctrinal concepts: justice, where we are in right • Course 2: God creates the human person in his image and likeness; we must respect the dignity relationship with God, with one of all (CCC 1700-1709); another, and with the rest of God's • Course 4: The unity of the human race (CCC creation. Justice was a gift of grace 760, 791, 813-822); given to all of humanity." • Course 6: The natural moral law as the basis for – U.S. bishops, Open Wide Our Hearts human rights and duties (CCC 1956-1960); • Option C: Christ’s command to love one another as he has loved us (CCC 1823, 2196) Objectives Students should be able to: 1. Become familiar with Catholic Social Teaching (CST) on the life and dignity of the human person. 2. Reflect on how racism rejects the image of God present in each of us. 3. Understand how the life and witness of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. exemplifies the social engagement called for by CST. Quotes from Open Wide our Hearts • "Overcoming racism is a demand of justice, but because Christian love transcends justice, the end of racism will mean that our community will bear fruit beyond simply the fair treatment of all." High School Activity: Dr. King • "Racism is a moral problem that requires a moral remedy—a transformation of the human heart—that impels us to act.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952)
    Georg Hegel (1770-1831) ................................ 30 Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) ................. 32 Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach (1804-1872) ...... 32 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) .......................... 33 Soren Kierkegaard (1813-1855) ..................... 33 Karl Marx (1818-1883).................................... 34 Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862) ................ 35 Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914).............. 35 William James (1842-1910) ............................ 36 The Modern World 1900-1950 ............................. 36 Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) .................... 37 Ahad Ha'am (1856-1927) ............................... 38 Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) ............. 38 Edmund Husserl (1859–1938) ....................... 39 Henri Bergson (1859-1941) ............................ 39 Contents John Dewey (1859–1952) ............................... 39 Introduction....................................................... 1 THE PHILOSOPHY BOOK George Santayana (1863-1952) ..................... 40 The Ancient World 700 BCE-250 CE..................... 3 Miguel de Unamuno (1864-1936) ................... 40 Introduction Thales of Miletus (c.624-546 BCE)................... 3 William Du Bois (1868-1963) .......................... 41 Laozi (c.6th century BCE) ................................. 4 Philosophy is not just the preserve of brilliant Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) ........................ 41 Pythagoras (c.570-495 BCE) ............................ 4 but eccentric thinkers that it is popularly Max Scheler
    [Show full text]
  • The Pre-History of Subsidiarity in Leo XIII
    Journal of Catholic Legal Studies Volume 56 Number 1 Article 5 The Pre-History of Subsidiarity in Leo XIII Michael P. Moreland Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcls This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Catholic Legal Studies by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact selbyc@stjohns.edu. FINAL_MORELAND 8/14/2018 9:10 PM THE PRE-HISTORY OF SUBSIDIARITY IN LEO XIII MICHAEL P. MORELAND† Christian Legal Thought is a much-anticipated contribution from Patrick Brennan and William Brewbaker that brings the resources of the Christian intellectual tradition to bear on law and legal education. Among its many strengths, the book deftly combines Catholic and Protestant contributions and scholarly material with more widely accessible sources such as sermons and newspaper columns. But no project aiming at a crisp and manageably-sized presentation of Christianity’s contribution to law could hope to offer a comprehensive treatment of particular themes. And so, in this brief essay, I seek to elaborate upon the treatment of the principle of subsidiarity in Catholic social thought. Subsidiarity is mentioned a handful of times in Christian Legal Thought, most squarely with a lengthy quotation from Pius XI’s articulation of the principle in Quadragesimo Anno.1 In this proposed elaboration of subsidiarity, I wish to broaden the discussion of subsidiarity historically (back a few decades from Quadragesimo Anno to the pontificate of Leo XIII) and philosophically (most especially its relation to Leo XIII’s revival of Thomism).2 Statements of the principle have historically been terse and straightforward even if the application of subsidiarity to particular legal questions has not.
    [Show full text]
  • Immaculate Conception, Moran, Parishioners Roll up Their Sleeves to Get Expensive Job Done
    The Newspaper of the Diocese of Marquette $2.00 20 PAGES MAY 20, 2011 VOL. 40 NO. 9 IINSIDENSIDE What drew me there? Immaculate Conception, Moran, parishioners In his column, Faith Matters, Bishop Alex- roll up their sleeves to get expensive job done ander Sample considers what BY PATRICIA SERWACH into implementation, the ‘to- drew him and IMMACULATE CONCEPTION do’ list just kept growing.” other pilgrims to the beatifica- PARISHIONER Bids to refinish the church’s tion of Pope John Paul II. scratched and peeling 12-foot- PAGE 2 hen members of long oak pews amounted to WImmaculate almost half the parish’s total Conception Parish in Moran renovation budget. In received permission from the November, a group of eight bishop to renovate their church, gutsy parishioners decided to they were happy campers. refinish the pews themselves. They had been saving for the In the end, the $39,000 refin- renovation since 1995, but the ishing job was reduced to Twilight priest shortage kept the project $3,000 out-of-pocket expense Read about Alice Paul, who on hold. In the interim, parish- and hundreds of volunteer is active at 92 and a resident ioners raised funds through hours; today, the refinished of the Bishop Noa Home, bake sales and their annual din- pews are a source of satisfac- living wills and health care ner and raffle, while holding tion. powers of attorney, tips to expenses to a minimum. Pastor Pawel Mecwel stay independent and more in Still, when they budgeted to dubbed this crew “the stripping this special section.
    [Show full text]
  • The Person and the Common Good*
    The Person and the Common Good* By Jacques Maritain Among the truthsof whichcontemporary thought stands in partic- ular need and from which it could draw substantialprofiit, is the doctrineof the distinctionbetween individuality and personality. The essentialimportance of this distinctionis revealedin the principlesof St. Thomas. Unfortunately,a right understandingof it is difficultto achieveand requiresan exerciseof metaphysicalinsight to whichthe contemporarymind is hardlyaccustomed. Does societyexist for each one of us, or does each one of us exist for society?Does the parishexist for the parishioneror the parishioner for the parish?This question,we feel immediately,involves two aspects, in each of which there must be some elementof truth. A unilateral answerwould only plunge us into error. Hence, we must disengage the formalprinciples of a truly comprehensiveanswer and describethe precisehierarchies of valueswhich it implies. The NineteenthCentury experiencedthe errorsof individualism. We have witnessedthe de- of velopment of a totalitarian or exclusively communal conception that societywhich took placeby way of reaction. It was natural,then, in a simultaneousreaction against both totalitarianand individualistic into errorsthe concept of the human person, incorporatedas such and that be opposed to both the idea of the totalitarian state society, to of the sovereigntyof the individual. In consequence,minds related uneven in widely differingschools of philosophicthought and quite intellectualexactitude and precisionhave sensed in the notionand term current of "person"the solution sought. Whence, the "personalist" remote which has developedin our time. Yet nothing can be more two We have undertaken in this paper a reconsideration and development of Deneke conferences: the first one, entitled "The Human Person and Society," was the Lecture, given at Oxford May 9, 1939, and published in a limited edition (Paris, Desclee de Brouver.
    [Show full text]
  • An Augustinian Correction to a Faulty Option: the Politics of Salt and Light
    Journal of Moral Theology, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2021): 46–72 An Augustinian Correction to a Faulty Option: The Politics of Salt and Light Anthony Crescio INCE ITS PUBLICATION IN 2017, Rod Dreher’s The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation has given rise to a cottage industry, including a wide range of S publications on the subject (either in support of or against) and conferences across the country. To be sure, a Christian perspective fully supports many elements in Dreher’s thought, like his calls for homes to become places of spiritual learning and growth,1 that institu- tions of Christian education take seriously their role in Christian for- mation,2 and the Church undergo a ressourcement type of renewal in all facets of its life.3 However, it is in the last area of ecclesiology where Dreher’s option ultimately fails in several ways because he does not grasp the full import of the sacramental ontology. While he rightly advocates a need for recovering it, he falls short in implementing it.4 His is, put simply, a failure of the imagination which has disastrous consequences for his understanding of how the church ought to engage in the political sphere. In order to demonstrate this failure, I adopt Dreher’s ressourcement methodology5 by engaging Augustine of Hippo as the primary inter- locutor and proceeding by way of four main steps. First, I discuss three ways Dreher’s work represents a failure of imagination. With the sec- ond step, I lay out Augustine’s sacramental metaphysics and corre- sponding ecclesiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 8-19-2020 Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists Anthony Philip Stine Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Stine, Anthony Philip, "Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5604. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7476 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: pdxscholar@pdx.edu. Catholic Social Teaching and Sustainable Development: What the Church Provides for Specialists by Anthony Philip Stine A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Affairs and Policy Dissertation Committee: Christopher Shortell, Chair Kent Robinson Jennifer Allen Daniel Jaffee Portland State University 2020 © 2020 Anthony Philip Stine Abstract The principles of Catholic Social Teaching as represented by the writings of 150 years of popes as well as the theorists inspired by those writings are examined, as well as the two principal schools of thought in the sustainability literature as represented by what is classically called the anthropocentric or managerial approach to sustainability as well as the biocentric school of thought. This study extends previous research by analyzing what the Catholic Church has said over the course of centuries on issues related to society, economics, and the environment, as embodied in the core concepts of subsidiarity, solidarity, stewardship, the common good, and integral human development.
    [Show full text]