Regency Review Spring 2009
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A) Involving Listed Buildings Or Within a Conservation Area: BRUNSWICK and ADELAIDE BH2007/02110 Flat 4 50 Brunswick Road Hove
BRIGHTON AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL WEEKLY LIST OF APPLICATIONS BRIGHTON AND HOVE CITY COUNCIL TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 PLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS & CONSERVATION AREAS) REGULATIONS 1990 TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING (GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE) ORDER 1995 PLEASE NOTE that the following planning applications were registered by the City Council during w/e 03/08/2007: (Notice under Article 8 and accompanied by an Environmental Statement where appropriate) a) Involving Listed Buildings or within a Conservation Area: BRUNSWICK AND ADELAIDE BH2007/02110 Flat 4 50 Brunswick Road Hove BRUNSWICK TOWN Internal alterations. Officer: Jonathan Puplett 292525 Applicant: Leanne Privett 13 Shakespeare St Hove BN3 5AG BH2007/02482 Basement Flat 21 Brunswick Road Hove BRUNSWICK TOWN Internal alterations including removal of partition walls and relocation of kitchen & bathroom. Officer: Jason Hawkes 292153 Applicant: Ms Ceri Silk Agent: Sylvia Godfrey Flat B1 3rd fl Cherry Crt 10 Consort Rise 38 Tongdean Rd Hove BN3 6QE Pok Fu Lam Hong Kong CENTRAL HOVE BH2007/00986 Double Garage Seafield Road Adj Seafield Cottage r/o 35 St Aubyns Hove OLD HOVE Demolition of double garage and erection of new town house. Officer: Sue Dubberley 292097 Applicant: The Conglomerate Agent: Mr S Mckay Double Garage Site Seafield Cottage LGFF 16 Marine Sq Brighton BN2 1DL Seafield Rd Hove BH2007/02293 Flat 2 195A Church Road Hove OLD TOWN Proposed velux windows on rear elevation to form rooms in the roof. Officer: Clare Simpson 292454 Applicant: Mr Tom Norrell Agent: John Alexander F2 195A Church Rd Hove Under Lucastes Kings Barn Villas Steyniing BN44 3FH BH2007/02468 Flat 9 13 - 14 Kings Gardens Hove THE AVENUES Internal alterations including repositioning of kitchen facilities. -
ROX-Brighton-Brochure.Pdf
COMBINING THE BEST IN DESIGN, SPECIFICATION, FACILITIES AND LOCATION, ROX IS CREATING A NEW LANDMARK FOR BRIGHTON. Built on the site of the derelict Astoria theatre building, the development will comprise a mixture of outstanding design-led new homes, residents’ amenities and flexible commercial spaces that will help transform this part of the city. The design concept and delivery of this incredible development will create an unrivalled combination for Brighton. Proof, if required, that in Brighton – life ROX. Left: The eye-catching facade of ROX Brighton HANCING THE ARTS IN CENTRAL BRIGHTON. ROX will create more than just new homes, with a striking double height atrium that will house a versatile events space that can be used for exhibitions and creative collaborations. Drawing upon Brighton’s rich heritage, ROX will revitalise the existing streetscape, becoming a vibrant hub of activity that will boost the local area and create long-term kerb appeal for generations to come. LOOKING TO THE FUTURE. From the billion pound investment on the seafront to the delivery of the New England Quarter, Brighton is a forward-thinking city with an appetite for growth. Proposals have been submitted for the multimillion pound re-landscaping of Valley Gardens, to create additional green spaces, a new square and improved walking and cycling links. All of this, on the doorstep of ROX. Above: The lobby and reception area of ROX Brighton Right: A balcony at one of the duplex apartments Above: A typical living and kitchen area of a two bedroom apartment, with an outstanding specification and finish REDEFINING CONTEMPORARY LIVING FOR BRIGHTON. -
Groundsure Planning
Groundsure Planning Address: Specimen Address Date: Report Date Report Reference: Planning Specimen Your Reference:Planning Specimen Client:Client Report Reference: Planning Specimen Contents Aerial Photo................................................................................................................. 3 1. Overview of Findings................................................................................................. 4 2. Detailed Findings...................................................................................................... 5 Planning Applications and Mobile Masts Map..................................................................... 6 Planning Applications and Mobile Masts Data.................................................................... 7 Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites Map.............................................................. 18 Designated Environmentally Sensitive Sites.................................................................... 19 Local Information Map................................................................................................. 21 Local Information Data................................................................................................ 22 Local Infrastructure Map.............................................................................................. 32 Local Infrastructure Data.............................................................................................. 33 Education.................................................................................................................. -
Heritage-Statement
Document Information Cover Sheet ASITE DOCUMENT REFERENCE: WSP-EV-SW-RP-0088 DOCUMENT TITLE: Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’: Final version submitted for planning REVISION: F01 PUBLISHED BY: Jessamy Funnell – WSP on behalf of PMT PUBLISHED DATE: 03/10/2011 OUTLINE DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS ON CONTENT: Uploaded by WSP on behalf of PMT. Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’ ES Chapter: Final version, submitted to BHCC on 23rd September as part of the planning application. This document supersedes: PMT-EV-SW-RP-0001 Chapter 6 ES - Cultural Heritage WSP-EV-SW-RP-0073 ES Chapter 6: Cultural Heritage - Appendices Chapter 6 BSUH September 2011 6 Cultural Heritage 6.A INTRODUCTION 6.1 This chapter assesses the impact of the Proposed Development on heritage assets within the Site itself together with five Conservation Areas (CA) nearby to the Site. 6.2 The assessment presented in this chapter is based on the Proposed Development as described in Chapter 3 of this ES, and shown in Figures 3.10 to 3.17. 6.3 This chapter (and its associated figures and appendices) is not intended to be read as a standalone assessment and reference should be made to the Front End of this ES (Chapters 1 – 4), as well as Chapter 21 ‘Cumulative Effects’. 6.B LEGISLATION, POLICY AND GUIDANCE Legislative Framework 6.4 This section provides a summary of the main planning policies on which the assessment of the likely effects of the Proposed Development on cultural heritage has been made, paying particular attention to policies on design, conservation, landscape and the historic environment. -
LOCUS FOCUS Forum of the Sussex Place-Names Net
ISSN 1366-6177 LOCUS FOCUS forum of the Sussex Place-Names Net Volume 2, number 1 • Spring 1998 Volume 2, number 1 Spring 1998 • NET MEMBERS John Bleach, 29 Leicester Road, Lewes BN7 1SU; telephone 01273 475340 -- OR Barbican House Bookshop, 169 High Street, Lewes BN7 1YE Richard Coates, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH; telephone 01273 678522 (678195); fax 01273 671320; email [email protected] Pam Combes, 37 Cluny Street, Lewes BN7 1LN; telephone 01273 483681; email [email protected] [This address will reach Pam.] Paul Cullen, 67 Wincheap, Canterbury CT1 3RX; telephone 01233 612093 Anne Drewery, The Drum, Boxes Lane, Danehill, Haywards Heath RH17 7JG; telephone 01825 740298 Mark Gardiner, Department of Archaeology, School of Geosciences, Queen’s University, Belfast BT7 1NN; telephone 01232 273448; fax 01232 321280; email [email protected] Ken Green, Wanescroft, Cambrai Avenue, Chichester PO19 2LB; email [email protected] or [email protected] Tim Hudson, West Sussex Record Office, County Hall, Chichester PO19 1RN; telephone 01243 533911; fax 01243 533959 Gwen Jones, 9 Cockcrow Wood, St Leonards TN37 7HW; telephone and fax 01424 753266 Michael J. Leppard, 20 St George’s Court, London Road, East Grinstead RH19 1QP; telephone 01342 322511 David Padgham, 118 Sedlescombe Road North, St Leonard’s on Sea TH37 7EN; telephone 01424 443752 Janet Pennington, Penfold Lodge, 17a High Street, Steyning, West Sussex BN44 3GG; telephone 01903 816344; fax 01903 879845 Diana -
Ladies Mile Road, Mile End Cottages, 1-6 Historic Building No CA Houses ID 75 & 275 Not Included on Current Local List
Ladies Mile Road, Mile End Cottages, 1-6 Historic Building No CA Houses ID 75 & 275 Not included on current local list Description: Brown brick terrace of six cottages, with red brick dressings and a clay tile roof. Two storey with attic; a matching dormer window has been inserted into the front roof slope of each property. The terrace is set at right angles to the road, at the western end of Ladies Mile Road, a drove road which became popular as a horse-riding route in the late 19th century. The properties themselves are of late 19th century date. They are first shown on the c.1890s Ordnance Survey map. A complex of buildings is shown to the immediate west of the cottages on this map. Arranged around a yard, this likely formed agricultural buildings or service buildings associated with Wootton House. The architectural style and physical association of the cottages to these buildings and the drove road suggests they may have formed farmworkers’ cottages. A Architectural, Design and Artistic Interest ii A solid example of a terrace of worker’s cottages B Historic and Evidential Interest ii Illustrative of the agricultural origins of Ladies Mile Road as a drove road and associated with the historic agricultural village of Patcham. C Townscape Interest ii Outside of Patcham Conservation Area, but associated with its history and contributes positively to the street scene F Intactness i Although some of the windows have been replaced, and there are modern insertions at roof level (particularly to the rear), the terrace retains a sense of uniformity and completeness Recommendation: Include on local list Lansdowne Place, Lansdowne Place Hotel, Hove Historic Building Brunswick Town Hotel ID 128 + 276 Not included on current local list Description: Previously known as Dudley Hotel. -
Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted
Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNINGProjects in planning up to detailed plans submitted. PLANS APPROVEDProjects where the detailed plans have been approved but are still at pre-tender stage. TENDERSProjects that are at the tender stage CONTRACTSApproved projects at main contract awarded stage. Leicestershire, LE12 8DX Tel: 01509 621001 Edgbaston £1.4m Detail Plans Granted for onion grading Agent: Mr. P Lingwood, 17 Northam Drive, Planning authority: Rutland Job: Detail DURHAM £1.1M Planning authority: Leeds Job: Outline NORTHAMPTON £0.32M Planning authority: Birmingham Job: Detail building Client: Moulton Bulb Co Ltd Ripley, Derbyshire, DE5 3SD Contractor: Plans Granted for warehouse/workshop BrandonHouse,GroveRoadBrandon Plans Submitted for 9 houses Client: Brooke MIDLANDS/ 8DraysonLaneCrick Plans Granted for horticultural/education Developer: David O’Conner & Associates, Marsden Developments Ltd, 6 Brendan Client: Shield Engineering Agent: Mr. James Planning authority: Durham County Job: Property Developments Ltd Agent: White Planning authority: Daventry Job: Outline centre Client: Martineau Gardens Developer: Wash Road, Kirton, Boston, Lincolnshire, Gardens, Derby, DE22 1BD Tel: 01332 550 043 Richardson, 5 Albert Road, Stamford, Detailed Plans Submitted for 20 flats & 2 Agus Partnership, Providence Villa, 42 EAST ANGLIA Plans Granted for 4 houses Client: Mr. & Mrs. Ecoarc Architects, High Fold, Kentmere, PE20 1QQ Tel: 01205 723 414 BIRMINGHAM £5M Lincolnshire, PE9 2EA Contractor: V Couzens bungalows Client: Housing Hartlepool Ltd -
Heritage at Risk Register 2016, London
London Register 2016 HERITAGE AT RISK 2016 / LONDON Contents Heritage at Risk III The Register VII Content and criteria VII Criteria for inclusion on the Register IX Reducing the risks XI Key statistics XIV Publications and guidance XV Key to the entries XVII Entries on the Register by local planning XIX authority Greater London 1 Barking and Dagenham 1 Barnet 2 Bexley 5 Brent 5 Bromley 6 Camden 11 City of London 20 Croydon 21 Ealing 24 Enfield 27 Greenwich 30 Hackney 34 Hammersmith and Fulham 40 Haringey 43 Harrow 47 Havering 50 Hillingdon 51 Hounslow 58 Islington 64 Kensington and Chelsea 70 Kingston upon Thames 81 Lambeth 82 Lewisham 91 London Legacy (MDC) 95 Merton 96 Newham 101 Redbridge 103 Richmond upon Thames 104 Southwark 108 Sutton 116 Tower Hamlets 117 Waltham Forest 123 Wandsworth 126 Westminster, City of 129 II London Summary 2016 he Heritage at Risk Register in London reflects the diversity of our capital’s historic environment. It includes 682 buildings and sites known to be at risk from Tneglect, decay or inappropriate development - everything from an early 18th century church designed by Nicholas Hawksmoor, to a boathouse built during WWI on an island in the Thames. These are sites that need imagination and investment. In London the scale of this challenge has grown. There are 12 more assets on the Heritage at Risk Register this year compared to 2015. We also know that it’s becoming more expensive to repair many of our buildings at risk. In the face of these challenges we’re grateful for the help and support of all those who continue to champion our historic environment. -
AMON WILDS ❋ Invitation, and Should Reply in in a Press Cuttings’ Album in Our Archive There Is One from the Order to Ensure Their Place
Regency Review CONSIDERING THE PAST…FRAMING THE FUTURE THE NEWSLETTER OF THE REGENCY SOCIETY ISSUE 19 NOVEMBER 2007 Murky Waters and Economical Truths y now Members will know that the Society did not The Council went on to say: Bproceed to a Judicial Review of the Council’s planning “Officers answered questions from Members about the Council’s decision on the King Alfred. It was a difficult decision to make role as landowner and whether the developer could have recourse not least because we had delays in obtaining information from to civil remedies if the Council amended its earlier decision. Since the City Council. such questions were raised, officers had a duty to answer them Following the reconfirmation of the Labour administration’s honestly and fairly. In responding to such questions officers decision by the new Conservative-led one, we sought emphasised that while members should be aware of the Council’s further advice from our planning barrister and a top planning wider role as landowner, which related largely to commercial solicitor. We had two principal objectives. These were to see matters, such matters fell outside the planning process. whether we were likely to obtain a ruling in the courts that Members were told that detailed discussions had taken place the previous decision was unsound and, if it was quashed, to with the developer over a long period of time and the developer open the way for a new planning decision, refusing consent. had incurred considerable costs in bringing the proposed scheme Counsel’s advice was that we had an arguable case concerning forward and working it up to its current stage. -
Housing Provision Paper
Housing Provision May 2018 SCAPE Carden Avenue and Norton Road pilot projects ITT exhibition feedback report 0 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 2. Background ......................................................................................................................... 2 b) Updated information on housing land supply ................................................................ 3 c) Site allocations in City Plan Part Two .............................................................................. 4 3. Assessment of Housing Delivery against the City Plan Target ........................................... 5 a) Large Identified Sites (6+ dwellings) in Development Areas .......................................... 5 b) Large Identified Sites (6+ dwellings) in the Rest of the City ........................................... 6 c) Small Sites (5 or less dwellings) ...................................................................................... 7 d) Other Sources of Housing Supply ................................................................................... 7 e) Housing supply summary ................................................................................................ 8 4. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 9 Appendices Appendix 1: City Plan Part 2 Housing delivery against City Plan targets Appendix -
Brighton and Hove Draft City Plan
Contents Part One: Introduction page no. Introduction and Overview 4 A profile of Brighton & Hove – context and challenges 10 Part Two: The Strategy Vision and Objective 16 The Strategy 22 Part Three: Development and Special Area policies DA1 – Brighton Centre and Churchill Square Area 28 DA2 – Brighton Marina, Gas Works and Black Rock Area 32 DA3 – Lewes Road Area 39 DA4 – New England Quarter and London Road Area 46 DA5 – Eastern Road and Edward Street Area 53 DA6 – Hove Station Area 60 DA7 – Toad’s Hole Valley 65 DA8 – Shoreham Harbour 71 SA1 – The Seafront 76 SA2 – Central Brighton 83 SA3 – Valley Gardens 88 SA4 – Urban Fringe 92 SA5 – The South Downs 95 SA6 – Sustainable Neighbourhoods 98 Part Four – City Wide Policies A Strong and Prosperous City CP1 Housing Delivery 106 CP2 Sustainable Economic Development 112 CP3 Employment Land 116 CP4 Retail Provision 121 CP5 Culture and Tourism 124 CP6 Visitor Accommodation 128 CP7 Infrastructure CIL and Developer Contributions 131 A Sustainable City CP8 Sustainable Buildings 134 CP9 Sustainable Transport 139 CP10 Biodiversity 149 CP11 Flood Risk 152 An Attractive City CP12 Urban Design 155 CP13 Public Streets and Spaces 158 CP14 Housing Density 160 CP15 Heritage 163 CP16 Open Space 165 CP17 Sports Provision 170 Healthy and Balanced Communities CP18 Healthy City 176 CP19 Housing Mix 178 CP20 Affordable Housing 182 CP21 Student Housing and Housing in Multiple Occupation 185 CP22 Traveller Accommodation 189 Appendix 1 Glossary of terms 192 Appendix 2 Key Diagram 200 Annexes (published separately) -
Short History
ADELAIDE CRESCENT AND PALMEIRA SQUARE - A SHORT HISTORY The land occupied by the Crescent and Square was originally part of the Wick Estate, the property of the Stapley family for 150 years until 1701. Anthony Stapley, a staunch Puritan who had succeeded to the estate at the age of fifteen, was distinguished by having been one of the judges at the trial of Charles the First, and a signatory to his death warrant of 29th January 1649, the day before the King's execution. He was active in the affairs of Sussex, Governor of Chichester from 1643 to 1645, and a Justice of the Peace until his death in 1655. By contrast, his son was a Royalist, and it was for this reason that the estate was intact at the Restoration in 1660. The estate was sold in 1701 for £,1600 to John Scutt of Brighthelmstone, whose grandson built Wick House, and whose great grandson, the Rev.Thomas Scutt, sold the estate to Sir Isaac Lyon Goldsmid in 1830. Five years previously to this, the architect of Kemp Town, Thomas Read Kemp, had entered into an agreement with Thomas Scutt, in the hope of building a Kemp Town West on the land to the west of Brunswick Town, but owing to lack of money this scheme was never realised. Sir Isaac Lyon Goldsmid planned to build a new estate of houses, and asked permission of William the Fourth to name the crescent after Queen Adelaide. The architect Decimus Burton was appointed, and work began in 1830. The original scheme was for a single semi-circular crescent, similar to Royal Crescent but much larger, and the first three houses facing the sea, and seven facing the Crescent, were either fully or partially completed by 1832.