Celebrity Silhouette® Summer 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CELEBRITY SILHOUETTE® SUMMER 2020 Itineraries subject to change without notice. ©2020 Celebrity Cruises Inc. Ships’ registry: Malta and Ecuador. 5/2020 Page 1 of 2 SAIL DATE ITINERARY PORTS England: Southampton, At Sea, At Sea, United Kingdom: Gibraltar, At Sea, Sardinia: Cagliari, Italy: 14-Night Italy Aug 1, 2020 Naples / Capri, Italy: Rome (Civitavecchia), Italy: Florence/Pisa (La Spezia), France: Provence & Mediterrenean (Marseille), At Sea, Spain: Seville (Cadiz), At Sea, At Sea, England: Southampton England: Southampton, At Sea, At Sea, United Kingdom: Gibraltar, Spain: Cartagena, Spain: Palma De 13-Night Spain Aug 15, 2020 Mallorca, Spain: Barcelona, Spain: Valencia, At Sea, Spain: Seville (Cadiz), Portugal: Lisbon, At Sea, & Portugal Mediterranean At Sea, England: Southampton England: Southampton, At Sea, Norway: Bergen, Norway: Alesund, Norway: Geiranger, Norway: Flam, Aug 28, 2020 8-Night Norwegian Fjords Norway: Stavanger, At Sea, England: Southampton England: Southampton, Channel Isl: St. Peter Port, Ireland: Cork (Cobh), Ireland: Waterford (Dunmore 14-Night Iceland Sep 5, 2020 East), Ireland: Dublin, Ireland: Dublin, At Sea, At Sea, Iceland: Akureyri, Iceland: Reykjavik, Iceland: & Ireland Reykjavik, At Sea, Northern Ireland: Belfast, At Sea, England: Southampton 9-Night Northern Europe England: Southampton, At Sea, Norway: Oslo, Norway: Oslo, Denmark: CopenhagenCruising, Belgium: Sep 19, 2020 Capital Cities Bruges (Zeebrugge), Netherlands: Amsterdam, France: Paris (Le Havre), England: Southampton 11-Night Spain, Portugal England: Southampton, At Sea, At Sea, Portugal: Madeira (Funchal), Canary Islands: Tenerife, Canary Islands: Sep 28, 2020 & Canary islands Gran Canaria, At Sea, Portugal: Lisbon, Portugal: Lisbon, Spain: Vigo, At Sea, England: Southampton England: Southampton, At Sea, Spain: Bilbao, At Sea, Spain: Vigo, Portugal: Lisbon, Portugal: Lisbon, Oct 9, 2020 10-Night Spain & Portugal At Sea, Spain: La Coruna, At Sea, England: Southampton 11-Night Spain, Portugal England: Southampton, At Sea, At Sea, Portugal: Madeira (Funchal), Canary Islands: Tenerife, Canary Islands: Oct 19, 2020 & Canary islands Gran Canaria, At Sea, Portugal: Lisbon, Portugal: Lisbon, Spain: Vigo, At Sea, England: Southampton England: Southampton, At Sea, Spain: Bilbao, Spain: La Coruna, At Sea, Portugal: Lisbon, Oct 30, 2020 9-Night UK, Spain & Portugal United Kingdom: Gibraltar, Spain: Cartagena, At Sea, Spain: Barcelona Spain: Barcelona, Valencia, Alicante, Untied Kingdom: Gibraltar, Spain: Malaga, At Sea, France: Nov 8, 2020 12-Night Spain, France & Italy Provence (Marseille),Nice (Villefranche), Italy: Florence/Pisa (La Spezia), Rome (Vicitavecchia), Naples/Capri, At Sea, Spain: Barcelona 16-Night Canary Islands Spain: Barelona, Cartagena, At Sea, Canary Islands: Lanzarote, Tenerife, At Sea, At Sea, At Sea, At Sea, Nov 20, 2020 & Argentina Transantlantic At Sea, At Sea, At Sea,Brazil: Rio De Janeiro, At Sea , At Sea, Argentina: Buenos Aires, Itineraries subject to change without notice. ©2020 Celebrity Cruises Inc. Ships’ registry: Malta and Ecuador. 5/2020 Page 2 of 2.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
[Show full text]
Archeacon of Gibraltar and Archdeacon of Italy and Malta
The Bishop in Europe: The Right Reverend Dr. Robert Innes The Suffragan Bishop in Europe: The Right Reverend David Hamid ARCHEACON OF GIBRALTAR AND ARCHDEACON OF ITALY AND MALTA Statement from the Bishops The Diocese in Europe is the 42nd Diocese of the Church of England. We are by far the biggest in terms of land area, as we range across over 42 countries in a territory approximately matching that covered by the Council of Europe, as well as Morocco. We currently attract unprecedented interest within the Church of England, as we are that part of the Church that specifically maintains links with continental Europe at a time of political uncertainty between the UK and the rest of Europe. Along with that, we have been in the fortunate position of being able to recruit some very high calibre lay and ordained staff. To help oversee our vast territory we have two bishops, the Diocesan Bishop Robert Innes who is based in Brussels, and the Suffragan Bishop David Hamid who is based in London. We have a diocesan office within Church House Westminster. We maintain strong connections with staff in the National Church Institutions. Importantly, and unlike English dioceses, our chaplaincies pay for their own clergy, and the diocese has relatively few support staff. Each appointment matters greatly to us. The diocesan strategy was formulated and approved over the course of 2015. We are emphasising our commitment to building up congregational life, our part in the re- evangelisation of the continent; our commitment to reconciliation at every level; and our particular role in serving the poor, the marginalised and the migrant.
[Show full text]
British Overseas Territories Law
British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identiﬁ ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
[Show full text]
The Long Arm of the Bribery
8 The Lawyer | 30 July 2012 Opinion On 5 July the Competition Appeal can be awarded where compensatory Holdvery Tribunal (CAT) handed down its damages alone would be insufficient judgment in the Cardiff Bus case, to punish the defendant for ‘outra- awarding damages in a ‘follow-on’ geous conduct’ including, as in this tightplease, claim for the ﬁrst time. This is also case, when the defendant was or the ﬁrst case in which exemplary should have been aware that its con- claimants damages for a breach of competition duct was probably illegal. law have been awarded. The CAT also stated that when ex- Award of exemplary In January 2011, 2 Travel brought a emplary damages are considered claim against Cardiff Bus following a they should have some bearing to the Y damages in Cardiff 2008 decision of the Office of Fair M compensatory damages awarded – in A L Bus case raises the Trading (OFT) which found that, by A this case, awarding exemplary dam- engaging in predatory conduct, Wheels of justice go round and round ages about twice the size of the com- stakes for claimants in Cardiff Bus had infringed the Com- pensatory award – and that they damages actions petition Act by abusing a dominant awarded damages for loss of profits should have regard to the economic position in the market. In particular, (of £33,818.79 plus interest) and also size of the defendant to be “of an when 2 Travel launched a no-frills exemplary damages of £60,000. order of magnitude sufficient to bus service, Cardiff Bus introduced Notwithstanding the low value of make the defendant take notice”.
[Show full text]
Press Release
PRESS RELEASE No: 81/2018 Date: 12th February Territories Take up Oceans, Plastics and More Minister for Environment and Climate Change John Cortes has co-chaired a meeting of the Council of Environment Ministers of the U.K. Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies held in Douglas on the Isle of Man. The meeting was hosted by the Isle of Man Government, whose Minister for Environment the Hon Geoffrey Boot co-chaired the two-day meeting. Thirteen territories were represented, and discussed a wide range of issues centring around the Environment. These included Climate Change, severe weather events, sustainable development, biodiversity, renewable energy, funding, Brexit, plastic pollution and the protection of the oceans. The Council was joined on the second day by officials from three U.K. Government departments, including Mr Ben Merrick, Director Overseas Territories at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Dr Gemma Harper, Depty Director for Marine from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), and Mr Huw Davis, Deputy Head of UNFCCC Negotiations representing the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. The Under-Secretary of State for the Environment, Dr Therese Coffey, joined the meeting by Skype. This was the first time that a UK Minister has directly participated in a meeting of the Council, which was originally set up in Gibraltar in 2015. The aim of the Council is to bring together Ministers and equivalents and senior officials from all the UK overseas jurisdictions in order to work together to improve environmental governance and sustainable development, and to engage the UK Government as appropriate.
[Show full text]
UK Overseas Territories
INFORMATION PAPER United Kingdom Overseas Territories - Toponymic Information United Kingdom Overseas Territories (UKOTs), also known as British Overseas Territories (BOTs), have constitutional and historical links with the United Kingdom, but do not form part of the United Kingdom itself. The Queen is the Head of State of all the UKOTs, and she is represented by a Governor or Commissioner (apart from the UK Sovereign Base Areas that are administered by MOD). Each Territory has its own Constitution, its own Government and its own local laws. The 14 territories are: Anguilla; Bermuda; British Antarctic Territory (BAT); British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT); British Virgin Islands; Cayman Islands; Falkland Islands; Gibraltar; Montserrat; Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands; Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands; Turks and Caicos Islands; UK Sovereign Base Areas. PCGN recommend the term ‘British Overseas Territory Capital’ for the administrative centres of UKOTs. Production of mapping over the UKOTs does not take place systematically in the UK. Maps produced by the relevant territory, preferably by official bodies such as the local government or tourism authority, should be used for current geographical names. National government websites could also be used as an additional reference. Additionally, FCDO and MOD briefing maps may be used as a source for names in UKOTs. See the FCDO White Paper for more information about the UKOTs. ANGUILLA The territory, situated in the Caribbean, consists of the main island of Anguilla plus some smaller, mostly uninhabited islands. It is separated from the island of Saint Martin (split between Saint-Martin (France) and Sint Maarten (Netherlands)), 17km to the south, by the Anguilla Channel.
[Show full text]
Cagliari International Container Terminal
CAGLIARI INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL THE CENTER AT YOUR SERVICE 1 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 CAGLIARI INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL MINIMAL DEVIATION FROM SUEZ–GIBRALTAR MAIN ROUTE Optimal weather conditions 365 d/y Zero delays on vessel maneuvring in-out EXTENDED HOME PORT FOR NORTH AFRICAN ECONOMIES 2 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 TOTAL RELIABILITY UPDATED 2019 WAIT AT ANCHOR VESSEL ON BERTH START OPERATIONS UNBERTHING AFTER (PILOT STATION) END OF OPERATIONS 1.5 Hours 20 Minutes 1.2 Hours AVERAGE DATA CALCULATED ON 192 OCEAN VESSELS AND 72 FEEDER VESSEL CALLS DURING 2018 3 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 CICT AT A GLANCE Handling Capacity Length of Quay Terminal Area 1.3 million TEUs 1,520 m 400,000 m2 3.6 million TEUs* 1,900 m* 900,000 m2* Water Depth Quay Cranes Yard Equipment Reefer Plugs 17 RTG 7 Gantry Crane 5 Reach Stacker 16 m (up to 18 rows) 10 Front Loader 1,000 1 Mobile Crane 31 Trucks *Future development *Future 32 Trailers UPDATED 2019 4 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY AND RELIABILITY MAXIMUM RELIABILITY FOR MOTHER-MOTHER AND MOTHER-FEEDER DIRECT CONNECTIONS FLEXIBLE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY VESSEL OPERATION 5 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 VOLUMES (TEUs and Vessel Calls) 8.4 MILLION TEUS HANDLED 303,000 495,000 631,000 690,000 532,000 257,000 709,000 576,000 558,000 582,000 656,000 656,000 686,000 671,000 433,000 215,000 UPDATED 2019 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 341 788 1081 791 421 289 963 813 770 811 835 795
[Show full text]
CODEBOOK for FOREIGN TV NEWS STUDY APPENDIX B – COUNTRY LIST Abkhazia – Republic of Abkhazia Afghanistan – Islamic Republi
CODEBOOK FOR FOREIGN TV NEWS STUDY APPENDIX B – COUNTRY LIST 001 Abkhazia – Republic of Abkhazia 002 Afghanistan – Islamic Republic of Afghanistan 003 Akrotiri and Dhekelia – Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia (UK) 004 Åland – Åland Islands (Autonomous province of Finland) 005 Albania – Republic of Albania 006 Algeria – People's Democratic Republic of Algeria 007 American Samoa – Territory of American Samoa (US territory) 008 Andorra – Principality of Andorra 009 Angola – Republic of Angola 010 Anguilla (UK overseas territory) 011 Antigua and Barbuda 012 Argentina – Argentine Republic 013 Armenia – Republic of Armenia 014 Aruba (Self-governing country in the Kingdom of the Netherlands) 015 Ascension Island (Dependency of the UK overseas territory of Saint Helena) 016 Australia – Commonwealth of Australia 017 Austria – Republic of Austria 018 Azerbaijan – Republic of Azerbaijan 019 Bahamas, The – Commonwealth of The Bahamas 020 Bahrain – Kingdom of Bahrain 021 Bangladesh – People's Republic of Bangladesh 022 Barbados 023 Belarus – Republic of Belarus 024 Belgium – Kingdom of Belgium 025 Belize 026 Benin – Republic of Benin 027 Bermuda (UK overseas territory) 028 Bhutan – Kingdom of Bhutan 029 Bolivia – Republic of Bolivia 030 Bosnia and Herzegovina 031 Botswana – Republic of Botswana 032 Brazil – Federative Republic of Brazil 033 Brunei – Negara Brunei Darussalam 034 Bulgaria – Republic of Bulgaria 035 Burkina Faso 036 Burundi – Republic of Burundi 037 Cambodia – Kingdom of Cambodia 038
[Show full text]
Alternative Investment Funds June 2012
hedgeweek guide to setting up Alternative Investment Funds June 2012 Focus Report: BVI • Cayman Islands • Gibraltar • Guernsey • Ireland • Jersey • Luxembourg • Malta CONTENTS In this issue… 03 Introduction By Sunil Gopalan, Global Fund Media 04 British Virgin Islands: Jurisdiction information 05 British Virgin Islands: Overview By Ross Munro, Harneys 09 Cayman Islands: Jurisdiction information 11 Cayman Islands: Overview By Marco Martins and Patrick Colegrave, Harneys 15 Gibraltar: Jurisdiction information 17 Gibraltar: Overview By James Lasry, Hassans 20 Guernsey: Jurisdiction information 22 Guernsey: Overview By Paul Wilkes, group partner, Collas Crill 25 Ireland: Jurisdiction information 28 Ireland: Overview By Dillon Eustace 35 Jersey: Jurisdiction information 37 Jersey: Overview By Ashley Le Feuvre, senior manager Funds/SPV Group, Volaw Trust & Corporate Services Limited 43 Luxembourg: Jurisdiction information 45 Luxembourg: Overview By Rémi Chevalier and Olivier Sciales, Chevalier & Sciales 54 Malta: Jurisdiction information 56 Malta: Overview By the Malta Financial Services Authority Publisher Special Reports Editor: Simon Gray, [email protected] News Editor: James Williams, [email protected] Sales Managers: Simon Broch, [email protected]; Malcolm Dunn, [email protected] Publisher & Editorial Director: Sunil Gopalan, [email protected] Graphic Design: Siobhan Brownlow, [email protected] Published by: GFM Limited, 1st Floor, Liberation Station, St Helier, Jersey JE2 3AS, Channel Islands Tel: +44 (0)1534 719780 Website: www.globalfundmedia.com ©Copyright 2012 GFM Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
[Show full text]
List of Commonwealth Countries, British Overseas Territories, British Crown Dependencies and EU Member States
List of Commonwealth countries, British Overseas Territories, British Crown Dependencies and EU member states Commonwealth countries1 Antigua and Barbuda Kenya St Vincent and the Grenadines Australia Kiribati Samoa The Bahamas Lesotho Seychelles Bangladesh Malawi Sierra Leone Barbados Malaysia Singapore Belize Malta* Solomon Islands Botswana Mauritius South Africa Brunei Mozambique Sri Lanka Cameroon Namibia Swaziland Canada Nauru Tonga Dominica New Zealand Trinidad and Tobago Fiji Nigeria Tuvalu Ghana Pakistan Uganda Grenada Papua New Guinea United Kingdom* Guyana Republic of Cyprus* United Republic of Tanzania India Rwanda Vanuatu Jamaica St Christopher and Nevis Zambia St Lucia Zimbabwe *Although also EU member states, citizens of the UK, Cyprus and Malta are eligible to be registered to vote in respect of all elections held in the UK. 1 Citizens of Commonwealth countries that have been suspended from the Commonwealth retain their voting rights. Their voting rights would only be affected if their country was also deleted from the list of Commonwealth countries in the British Nationality Act 1981 through an Act of the UK Parliament. British Overseas Territories Anguilla Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands Bermuda St Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha British Antarctic Territory South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands British Indian Ocean Territory Sovereign Base areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia on Cyprus Cayman Islands Falkland Islands Turks and Caicos Islands Gibraltar Virgin Islands Montserrat British Crown Dependencies
[Show full text]
Jurisdictional Considerations in Establishing a Protective Trust
JURISDICTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ESTABLISHING A PROTECTIVE TRUST OFFSHORE TRUSTS: HOW THE LANDMARK CASES HAVE AFFECTED DRAFTING ISSUES AND SELECTION OF JURISDICTION International Bar Association International Wealth Transfer Practice Conference New York, New York December 8-10, 2003 Elizabeth M. Schurig* Giordani Schurig Beckett Tackett LLP 100 Congress Avenue, 22nd Floor Austin, Texas 78701 512.370.2720 www.gsbtlaw.com I. INTRODUCTION. When approaching the question of asset protection planning, it is important to review the types of jurisdictions in which a protective structure might be sitused and the statutory and case law of those jurisdictions. To that end, this outline will first discuss the preliminary issues that must be considered when implementing a protective trust before focusing on selected foreign jurisdictions. It will then discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the recent asset protection trust legislation in certain U.S. states. II. PRELIMINARY ISSUES. Before focusing on specific jurisdictions, it is important to consider the following general issues, always keeping in mind that the most protective structures are those that are completely severed from the United States. A. Aggressive Vs. Non-Aggressive Legislation. One alternative is to seek the protection of those jurisdictions which have aggressive asset protection legislation (such as the Cook Islands, Gibraltar, and the Bahamas); however, some clients may take greater comfort in the fact that jurisdictional ties will be severed and that there is greater security in more established offshore financial centers (such as the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands, or Liechtenstein). However, even if the only objective is asset protection, it is not necessarily appropriate to select a jurisdiction that has aggressive legislation because a potential claimant could assert that the presence of aggressive * © Copyright 2003 Elizabeth M.
[Show full text]
W Bonnici. Inspector of Hospitals Ralph Green and the Plague In
J R Army Med Corps: first published as 10.1136/jramc-144-01-10 on 1 February 1998. Downloaded from J R Army Med Corps 1998; 144: 40-45 Inspector of Hospitals Ralph Green and the Plague in Malta of 1813 Lt Col W Bonnici MRCGP,DCH,RAMC* 24 Armoured Field Ambulance, Gaza Barracks, Catterick Garrison, DL9 4AU SUMMARY: Bubonic plague reached Malta from Alexandria on 29 March 1813. The British garrison of about 3700 men escaped lightly, with only twenty deaths. However, the epidemic brought the Army medical officers in conflict with the Colonial Governor. This article looks at the turbulence generated by the plague among the medical staff officers, and at the role they played in the Public Health Services of the island. Introduction lazaretto. Green informed his regimental surgeons that he Malta became a British possession in September 1800. had that morning inspected the cadaver of a female who It was administered by the garrison commander who acted had died of plague. He urged them to be vigilant and to as His Majesty's Civil Commissioner. However, in 1813 inspect the troops frequently, as "it was very probable from the Islands were formally annexed to the Crown, and a the incautious life of a soldier, someone might receive the Governor was appointed to run the colony. Lieutenant infection and communicate it to the rest of the garrison" General Sir Thomas Maitland was the first and most (3). Green assembled a medical board with Brooke autocratic of the thirty-four British Governors. He arrived Faulkner as president, and instructed him "to draw up a in Malta on 3 October 1813, and took command of the few medical rules for the guidance of the Maltese" (3).
[Show full text]