DOCSLIB.ORG

New Directions for Bioacoustics Collections Author(S): Sandra L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Directions for Bioacoustics Collections Author(S): Sandra L New Directions for Bioacoustics Collections Author(s): Sandra L. L. Gaunt, Douglas A. Nelson, Marc S. Dantzker, Gregory F. Budney, and Jack W. Bradbury Source: The Auk, 122(3):984-987. 2005. Published By: The American Ornithologists' Union DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0984:NDFBC]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1642/0004-8038%282005%29122%5B0984%3ANDFBC %5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Commentary The Auk 122(3):966–971, 2005 © The American Ornithologists’ Union, 2005. Printed in USA. Bird Collections: Development and Use of represent the original “big science” expendi- a Scientifi c Resource.—Bird collections were tures in the life sciences, antedating by cen- founded and built during the heyday of global turies large contemporary endeavors such as exploration. The mission of these collections genome projects. Long-term investments in the through most of their history has been to docu- development and maintenance of collections ment avian diversity and its distribution and to have produced a resource equivalent in many serve as a resource for research and education. respects to the mega-science facilities found in As bird collections became established and grew, other disciplines (e.g. large telescopes or super- ornithology itself became a scientifi c discipline colliders). A key diff erence is that this resource and broadly expanded its purview. Today, there has a useful lifespan that greatly exceeds that of are more professional ornithologists than at any mechanical facilities. Bird collections need to be time in history, and collections-related research viewed as a highly versatile and indispensable represents only a small portion of the discipline. resource integral to the continued successful This is healthy. Collections are but one means (and economical) pursuit of a wide range of through which we study birds. But we cannot be subjects. Importantly, these subjects are no lon- lulled into a view that the day of the collection is ger restricted to ornithology. past—a decided risk when fewer ornithologists Unlike other, contemporary “big science” have direct experience either with collections projects, biological collections establish an or with the multidimensional strengths that a object legacy—continuing sources of data that collections-based approach brings to science. are repeatedly tapped to provide answers to Too li le a ention has been paid to the role of questions about birds and environmental con- bird collections in science. This role is changing. ditions. Many of these questions were not even Because we understand avian diversity be er imagined by those who have built these collec- than that of most other classes of organisms, tions. Indeed, as the ways in which museum the central goal for establishing bird collections specimens are used multiplies with conceptual, would seem to be largely accomplished. As any- technological, and environmental changes, it one studying avian diversity knows, however, is clear that we need to refocus on how best to much remains to be done: systematics, pa erns continue developing this resource. and processes of diff erentiation, and geographic variation in birds remain vigorous areas of new Sujhnrjsx fsi Shnjshj ymwtzlm Tnrj learning. But while those of us close to collections remain connected to these important questions, Mismatches in temporal relevance.—The classic to others what we do is increasingly arcane. analogy that natural history collections are like AV er all (tongue in cheek), isn’t there already libraries invites direct comparisons between a fi eld guide? To an undiscriminating public, specimens and books. There is some mate- much of this work would seem to be done once rial similarity to these objects; old books and a fi eld guide appears. And, indeed, explorations bird skins are products of animal skin and at that level in most regions are largely complete. plant materials. With care, books can easily But in other respects the scientifi c strengths of last for many centuries, and a useful lifespan collections-based research are blossoming—with of more than a millennium is likely. Eff ective no end in sight to the fruits that can be borne. preservation of bird skins has been practiced Bird collections are probably the strongest for only about two centuries, but the skins will and most dependable shared resource in clearly last far longer. Beyond simple object ornithology. Biological collections in general comparisons, consider use: it is routine in 966 July 2005] Commentary 967 collections-based work to use specimens 100 “Arrogance of the present.”—The scientifi c capa- years old or older, and historical specimens are bilities and accomplishments of today are truly increasingly used to conduct retrospective stud- impressive when compared with those of yester- ies—research asking questions about changes year. But this will be equally true in the future, in birds and the environments they live(d) in. when the accomplishments of today will be over- As time passes, preserved specimens increase shadowed by those of our successors. Thus, to in scientifi c value. By contrast, the value of be er serve our science, we should consider how journal articles and books we produce today we might contribute to a future 50 or 100 years will be relatively short-lived (see ISI Journal from now. What do we have that they will not? Citation Reports; www.isinet.com); aV er only a A key asset of the present is access to a biota that few decades most of our papers will no longer is still probably half intact. There is strong evi- directly contribute to science. Thus, in terms dence that passing samples of this biota forward of utility and relevance, these two products a to future researchers is one of the most eff ective researcher can leave behind—specimens and ways to contribute to the accomplishments of publications—have strikingly diff erent trajec- future science, and that archiving specimens tories. Publications are important. But the long- will enhance the eff ectiveness of future wildlife term scientifi c value of specimens is widely management and conservation (e.g. through the underappreciated, and we probably place too growing importance of retrospective studies). much emphasis on producing publications, the more ephemeral of the two products that we Gtnsl Ftw|fwi might leave as our scientifi c legacy. “Biological fi lter paper.”—Just as historical Collections are helping to answer widely anthropogenic objects like books refl ect changes important questions about birds and our shared in human history, so too can preserved specimens environments, and meeting the needs of users enable us to appreciate and measure changes. is a central purpose of a collection. As the user One of the most important developments in col- community grows, so too should support and lections-based science is the retrospective study, participation in continued collections develop- a very powerful approach for assessing changes ment. And the strengths of collections must be in populations and environments. Specimens considered broadly, separately from individual document life in three dimensions: geographic research programs. space (locality), biodiversity space (taxonomy), With increasing frequency, specimen loan and time (date). The last dimension is becom- requests ask diff erent questions of preserved ing increasingly important, because historical material than the questions for which that mate- samples enable us to enlist this strong analytic rial was originally preserved (e.g. feather pluck- approach to measure and understand change. ing of skins for genetic, isotopic, or contaminant Probably the broadest reward this science brings analyses, and disease screening of genetic sam- to society as a whole is through the increasing ples). In fact, one cannot predict what question, use of specimens as “biological fi lter paper,” specimen type, or taxon the next loan request documenting “experiments” in the environments will hit upon. This is a double-edged sword: it in which these animals lived. In many studies, a reassures us that collections are broadly useful, species or genus is chosen because it represents an but it suggests that collections growth is becom- important trophic level at which to measure bio- ing increasingly out of touch with collections- accumulation or magnifi cation of contaminants. based science. As the array of possible uses has These measurements have profound implications increased, our ability to foresee what the speci- for humans and the natural resources we man- men needs of tomorrow will be has declined. age, and these studies repeatedly demonstrate There is li le doubt that there will be need, that historical samples are crucial. Birds are excel- however. Important questions about changes in lent bioindicators of environmental conditions, populations and environments will expand the and bird specimens should continue to be at the need for specimens, and adequate sample sizes forefront of this fi eld. Continued acquisition of from today will be required. new specimens should be seen as a priority. The So it is clear that the resource itself must time dimension can be studied only with contin- continue to be developed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INFORMATION to USERS This Manuscript Has Been Reproduced from the Microfilm Master
    Alaska's First Wolf Controversy: Predator And Prey In Mount McKinley National Park, 1930-1953. Item Type Thesis Authors Rawson, Timothy Mark Download date 03/10/2021 22:14:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/8514 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margias, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to MS 4800 James O. Dorsey Papers, Circa 1870-1956, Bulk 1870-1895
    Guide to MS 4800 James O. Dorsey papers, circa 1870-1956, bulk 1870-1895 Lorain Wang Creation of this finding aid was funded through support from the Arcadia Fund. Digitization and preparation of additional materials for online access has been funded also by the National Science Foundation under BCS Grant No. 1561167 and the Recovering Voices initiative at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History. 2014 National Anthropological Archives Museum Support Center 4210 Silver Hill Road Suitland 20746 [email protected] http://www.anthropology.si.edu/naa/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 2 Selected Bibliography...................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State Plan 1999
    Arizona Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan Marjorie J. Latta, Arizona Partners in Flight Co-chair Carol J. Beardmore, Western Regional Coordinator, Partners in Flight Troy E. Corman, Arizona Partners in Flight Co-chair Version 1.0 Technical Report 142 Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Arizona Game and Fish Department 2221 West Greenway Road Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 June 1999 CIVIL RIGHTS AND DIVERSITY COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Commission receives Federal financial assistance in Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration. Under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act f 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information please write to: Arizona Game and Fish Department Office of the Deputy Director 2221 West Greenway Road DOHQ Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 and The Office for Diversity and Civil Rights U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4040 North Fairfax Drive Room 300 Arlington, Virginia 22203 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE The Arizona Game and Fish Department complies with all provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This document is available in alternative format by contacting Terry B. Johnson, Nongame Branch, Arizona Game and Fish Department, 2221 West Greenway Road, Phoenix, Arizona 85023-4399 - (602) 789- 3501 or TTY 7-800-367-8939.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. John George Gehring and His Bethel Clinic: Pragmatic Therapy and Therapeutic Tourism William D
    Maine History Volume 43 Number 3 Mind, Body, and Spirit: Maine's Article 5 Therapeutic Landscapes 1-1-2008 Dr. John George Gehring and His Bethel Clinic: Pragmatic Therapy and Therapeutic Tourism William D. Andrews Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Andrews, William D.. "Dr. John George Gehring and His Bethel Clinic: Pragmatic Therapy and Therapeutic Tourism." Maine History 43, 3 (2008): 188-216. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal/vol43/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dr. John George Gehring Home Clinic, Bethel, Maine, circa 1900. Gehring’s grand home still stands today on Broad Street above the Bethel Common. Dur- ing the early twentieth century, the home functioned as a clinic where promi- nent academics, scientists, writers, politicians, industrialists, philanthropists, and socialites stayed for varying periods, receiving treatment for anxiety, stress, depression, and digestive ailments. Photo courtesy of the Bethel Historical Society, Bethel, Maine. DR. JOHN GEORGE GEHRING AND HIS BETHEL CLINIC: PRAGMATIC THERAPY AND THERAPEUTIC TOURISM BY WILLIAM D. ANDREWS During the first quarter of the twentieth century, Dr. John George Gehring treated hundreds of patients for stress, anxiety, and depression at his home in Bethel, Maine. Employing a pragmatic mix of hypnotism, medication, talk therapy, and behavior modification, Gehring attracted famous writers, academics, philanthropists, politicians, and socialites from around the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Foster Batchelder, Last of the “Shotgun” Ornithologists
    HE SPANNED TWO ERAS: CHARLES FOSTER BATCHELDER, LAST OF THE “SHOTGUN” ORNITHOLOGISTS by William E. Davis, Jr. Charles Foster Batchelder was born before the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species changed biological perspective around the world and launched evolution as the guiding paradigm of biology. Change came slowly to ornithology — never a cutting-edge field of biological endeavor until nearly the middle of the twentieth century — and Batchelder grew up and matured in a world in which ornithology largely involved collecting specimens and naming new species (and, after Darwinian thought had destroyed the constraining notion of the fixity of species, describing geographic races or subspecies). Biogeography — the study of the distribution of species — was in its infancy, genetics was still the well-kept secret of Gregor Mendel, and ecology as a scientific discipline did not exist. Conservation was not a priority, if it was considered at all: nature was still viewed as bountiful and limitless, the disappearance of the Dodo and the Great Auk, and a number of other blemishes notwithstanding. Ornithology was in its infancy and inextricably intertwined with hobby collecting of bird skins, nests, and eggs. Charles Foster Batchelder was born on July 20, 1856, at 7 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, adjacent to Harvard Yard, and he resided there until his death in 1954. As a boy Batchelder loved to roam the fields and woodlands of then-rural Cambridge, and as a teenager he made the acquaintance of like-minded neighbors, including William Brewster, Henry Henshaw, and Ruthven Deane, who were about five years his senior.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Refuge Is Born
    By William Reffalt Fish and Wildlife Service Volunteer Introduction Celebrating 100 years of protection and management at Pelican Island highlights several important aspects of America’s federal commitment to land conservation for fish, wildlife, plants and habitats. Marking the Refuge System’s centennial year is an historical occasion that most current and retired refuge employees, volunteers and visitors eagerly anticipate. From an historical perspective, it is important to note that reserving Pelican Island, creating the first unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System, was not an instantaneous brainstorm of President Theodore Roosevelt, as astute as he was. Actions by persons to protect birds over a century ago ultimately contributed to T.R.’s bold commitment to an American wildlife and habitat conservation system. 1. Frank Chapman Proposes to Buy Pelican Island and Protect Its Pelicans Pelican Island is located in Florida’s Indian River about 45 miles south of Cape Canaveral, lying close inside the barrier island protecting the coastline in this area (see map on following page). Dr. Henry Bryant of Boston, an especially active ornithologist of the period, discovered its ornithological merits during several visits to Florida in 1854-1858. His description is informative, “I found (brown pelicans) breeding in larger and larger numbers as I went north (from Key West), until I arrived at Indian River, where I found the most extensive breeding-place that I visited; this was a small island, called Pelican Island, about 20 miles north of Fort Capron. The nests here were placed in the tops of mangrove- trees, which were about the size and shape of large apple-trees.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam: Charles Barney Cory
    THE AUK- A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY. VOL. XXXXX. Ara•L, 1922. No. 2 IN MEMORIAM: CHARLES BARNEY CORY. BORNJANUARY 31, 1857--DIED JULY31, 1921. BY WILFRED H. OSGOOD. Plate IV. Yr•R by year the numberof survivingfounders of the American Ornithologists'Union is beingreduced until onefeels the pressure of comingtime when it will be a distinctioneven to have known them. To those of another generation,their gradual passinghas a peculiarsadness and a grimsignificance, which bring a reali- zation that not only they themselvesbut the pioneerdays in which they moved are gone forever. Their names and their works stand monumentally and their personal memories will linger long, but no one can ever replacethem becausethey and their times are inextricablylinked together. In the death of CharlesB. Cory duringthe past year, we have lost anotherpioneer and one who will be rememberednot only as a productiveornithologist, but alsoas a manof greatindividual- ity andalmost picturesque character. Mr. Cory was born in Boston ' January31, 1857. His birthplacewas a housebuilt by his father at 1225 WashingtonSt., facing the Catholic Cathedral on the site later occupiedby the Arlington Hotel. On his father's side, he came of sturdy old New England sea-faringstock--son of BarneyCory, grandsonof NathanielB. Cory and great-grandson of Philip Cory, whosegrandfather came to America in the first 151 Tnr. Aunt, VOL. XXXIX. P•aq's IV. 152 Osooo.,In Memoriam:Charles Barney Cory. AprilAuk half of the seventeenth century and settled ia Rhode Island. His grandmother,on his father's side,was Meribah Gatdinerwho was directly descendedfrom GeorgeSoule, reputed to have reached Massachusettsin 1620.
    [Show full text]
  • National Geographic Society Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB Control No. 1024-0018 expiration date 03/31/2022 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: National Geographic Society Historic Buildings______________________ Other names/site number: ____________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: 1145 17th Street NW________________________________ City or town: Washington____________ State: DC____________ County: NA Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National
    [Show full text]
  • The First Descriptions of North American Birds by 0
    First Descriptions of North American Birds 203 Coues, Elliott. 1874. Birds of the northwest. Misc. Publ. 3, U. S. Geol. Survey. Dery, D. A. 1933. Preliminary report on the migration in Quebec of the northern sharp-tailed grouse. Bull. 1, Quebec Zool. Sot. Errington, P. L. 1931. The northern bobwhite’s winter food, Part II. Amer. Game, September-October. Grinnell, J., Bryant, H. C., and Storer, T. I. 1918. The game birds of California. Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley. Gross, Alfred 0. 1930. Progress report of the Wisconsin prairie chicken investi- gation. Wisconsin Conservation Commission, Madison. Judd, S. D. 1905. The grouse and wild turkeys of the United States, and their economic value. Bull. 24, U. S. Biol. Survey. Leopold, Aldo. 1931. Report on a game survey of the north central states. Sport- ing Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute, Madison, Wisconsin. -. 1933. Game management. Charles Scribners’ Sons, New York. UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN, MADISON, WISC. THE FIRST DESCRIPTIONS OF NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS BY 0. A. STEVENS Many a biologist has longed for the opportunity to examine the fauna and flora of some land never before visited by a naturalist. Few have had that opportunity, and usually the information on a new country has accumulated over a period of time, through uncertain channels, much of it poorly collected and poorly preserved. Here in America we particularly wonder what birds the first Europeans noted and what they thought of them. The Baltimore Oriole and the Yellow Warbler were the first ones mentioned by Maximilian when he landed at Boston, but that was in 1833, more than 300 years after the arrival, of the first explorers.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Mammalogy
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY Published Quarterly by the American Society of Mammalogists VOL. 24 NOVEMBER 17, 1943 No. 4 CLINTON HART MERRIAM-1855-1942* BY WILFRED H. OSGOOD C. Hart Merriam was the first president of the American Society of Mammalo- gists. In itself, this might not be significant, but to those familiar with the his- tory of American mammalogy it marks the expression of a rarely equalled pre- eminence of one man in a given field of science. But for him a society of mam- malogists might not have been possible and, although younger men were more active in promoting the organization, no other could have been thought of for the honor of presiding at its opening sessions. His position was unique and everyone recognized it. He was the central figure and the most dynamic in an era of very great activity and progress. To review his life is to recapitulate the events of this era and to indicate their far reaching effects not only in this country but throughout the world. EARLY LIFE He was born December 5, 1855, at Locust Grove, New York, where his parents lived in a rural mansion surrounded by ample acres and shadowed by the Adiron- dack Mountains. In such surroundings many a boy has a passion for the woods and fields even to the extent of beginning seriously to probe their secrets. Some- times it may continue through life, but usually only as a pastime and a refuge from interests that are considered more practical. This boy, however, saw his career in it and from his early teens was engrossed with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 45 No. 07 April 1979
    WESTERN TANAGER Los Angeles Audubon Society Volume 45 April 1979 Number 7 The Discovery of the Birds of the^Cfest by Barry Clark o the legions of latter-day birders, caught up in the challenge of contributing new species to their personal state or AOU lists, it may come as something of a surprise to realize that little more than a century ago much of our land was wilderness, its physical features uncharted, its avifauna largely unknown to science. From our present vantage point we may look back with a measure of amazement to those bygone days, reliving the exploits of that earnest band of early ornithologists who trudged the western birding trails before us, opening the eyes of a continent to a new world of wonder. Though the full story of western ornithology has yet to be set to paper, from the scattered fragments we may at least make out the broad outlines. The subject itself is vast and richly variegated, and to place it in its proper perspective we must delve deep into the past—for the roots of our tale reach back far beyond our times, to the earliest urgings of mankind. Birds, it appears, have always been a source of wonderment to men: Witness the fact that the Aves remain today the most thoroughly studied of any class in the Animal Kingdom. At the outset, no doubt, our interest in birds was bound up in the struggle for survival; but it's unlikely that even our most primitive forebears could have failed to appreciate the aesthetic and philosophical implications of such dazzling and ingratiating products of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Biological Survey: a Compendium of Its History, Personalities, Impacts, and Conflicts
    AUTHOR(S).—TITLE I Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 64 21 January 2016 United States Biological Survey: A Compendium of its History, Personalities, Impacts, and Conflicts Edited by David J. Schmidly, William E. Tydeman, and Alfred L. Gardner Editorial Comment: HISTORY AND ARCHIVES IN NATURAL HISTORY: WHAT CAN THEY TELL US? “If you don’t know history, you don’t know anything. You are like a leaf that doesn’t know it is part of a tree.” Michael Crichton “There is history in all men’s lives.” William Shakespeare “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.” William Faulkner The history of natural science yields a complex mosaic not only about the life and work of naturalists, but also quite specific and unique perspectives about their investigations, collections, and personalities. It is instruc- tive to see how some of the thoughts, attitudes, and practices of today differ from those of the past. Here history plays a key role in unlocking the complexities of how science changes. It can even enlighten us about ideas that began 100 years ago and that are still percolating in scientific debates. A sophisticated understanding of the past is one of the most powerful tools we have for shaping the future. The history of any enterprise is important to instill a sense of identity and purpose and remind people of “who we are.” Or as Pearl Buck once said, “If you want to understand today, you have to search yesterday.” One of the most impressive aspects of these papers is the depth and scope of the search process that Buck alludes to.
    [Show full text]