Al-Hajjaj's Grammatical Strategies of Ibnwalad Al-Tamimiat His Book Al-Intesar of Sibawayhonal-Mubarrad As a Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Al-Hajjaj's grammatical strategies of IbnWalad Al-Tamimiat his book Al-Intesar of SibawayhonAl-Mubarrad as a model PJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) Al-Hajjaj's grammatical strategies of IbnWalad Al-Tamimiat his book Al- Intesar of SibawayhonAl-Mubarrad as a model Bassim Khairy Khudair and Semaa Fadhel Maskoor Department of Arabic Language, College of Education for Human Sciences, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq. BassimKhairyKhudair and SemaaFadhelMaskoor , Al-Hajjaj's Grammatical Strategies Of Ibnwalad Al-Tamimiat His Book Al-Intesar Of Sibawayhonal- Mubarrad As A Model , Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(7). ISSN 1567-214x. Keywords: Al-Hajjaj, IbnWalad Al-Tamimi, strategies, reasoning, discursive techniques. Abstract: Al-Hajjajbased on a set of foundations and mechanisms. Practiced by the speaker while directing his speech to the recipient. He seeks to effect a change in the thoughts of this recipient, to convince him of a certain idea; by employing these mechanisms and techniques, he intends to use different strategies according to the nature of the inferential argument.The study sought to uncover those strategies that IbnWalad used in his Hajj pilgrimages with al-Mubarrad.In order to convince the recipient of the validity of the Sibawayh school of thought, and to reveal the error of the cooler. Introduction: As the main function of language is influence, the main purpose of the pilgrims was persuasion, and the purpose of the speaker and his goal was to persuade the recipient and get him to submit, and "the rhetoric is intended to persuade and confirm what you call conditions and possibility" (In the rhetoric of the persuasive speech, Muhammad Al-Omari, p.5). In order to achieve persuasion and influence the audience, the preacher uses specific strategies, according to what is required by the situation and the context to achieve his persuasive goal. The word strategy was used in various fields of science and knowledge, and "this term has acquired a general meaning as it denotes all concerted action in order to achieve a certain goal. 16136 Al-Hajjaj's grammatical strategies of IbnWalad Al-Tamimiat his book Al-Intesar of SibawayhonAl-Mubarrad as a model PJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) It was said: electoral strategy, commercial strategy, political strategy.The concept is used pivotally in various fields of thought such as game theory, cognitive psychology, social psychology and discourse analysis "(Al-Hajjaj in contemporary political discourse, d. ZakariaSarti, p. 251). Game theory defines the concept of strategy as: "A set of rules that define a player's behavior in any possible playing situation" (In al-Balaghah al-Hajjaj towards an argumentative approach to the analysis of discourses, Muhammad Mishbal, p. 71), and in the military and political sphere, they mean: "Planning and defining the means that must be adopted at the top and the base to achieve remote goals. It was the art and science of making war plans and managing war operations "(Discourse strategies of Imam Ali, a deliberative approach, Dr. BassimKhairyKhudair, p. 25). They were “specific ways to deal with a problem, or to carry out a task, or a group of tasks or a set of processes aimed at achieving certain goals, or measures designed to control specific information and control it” (Speech Strategies of the Month, p. 53), and the strategy of all kinds is not without being a group of methods taken to achieve specific goals, and "the strategy is linked to the speech because it is a process by which the sender selects the appropriate phrases and words, as well as choosing the appropriate context, before uttering his speech, he plans how to produce it, as well as how to convey its meaning to the addressee.The sender is keen on using the language accurately and in harmony with the context. ”(Discourse strategies, d. BassimKhairyKhudair, p. 26). Al-Khatib takes the appropriate strategy in his speech to achieve his persuasive purpose, so "every discursive strategy is always an argumentative strategy. Its argumentation is manifested in that it is necessarily intentional and purposeful; Because it tends to convey the intellectual, emotional, and behavioral features hidden in the same speaker to the audience "(Al-Hajjaj in Contemporary Political Discourse, p. 254). The pilgrim strategy is a strategy behind which the sender aims to make a change in the intellectual or emotional position of the addressee, this strategy is through which the sender seeks to persuade the addressee by various means of the validity of his position or the sway of his idea, or the preference of his commodity according to the context and the subject of the ongoing dialogue between the sender and the addressee (Speech strategies in the Sunnah of the Prophet, IdrisMaqbool, Journal of the College of Islamic Sciences, Volume VIII, Issue (2/14) pp. 555-556, 2014). IbnWalad Al-Tamimi practiced various strategies in refuting the refrigerator's objections to Sibawayh, all these strategies are governed by the principle of presentation and refutation, he presents the argument of the file and then refutes it, using all the linguistic possibilities, and mental and transport evidence, as well as his grammatical capabilities, as one of the professors in the science of grammar. 1. Initiation and comment: It is one of the strategies adopted by IbnWalad, and its meaning: "He gave the opponent the reins of the beginning to reveal his speech and the essence of his argument in front of the 16137 Al-Hajjaj's grammatical strategies of IbnWalad Al-Tamimiat his book Al-Intesar of SibawayhonAl-Mubarrad as a model PJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) opposing other,", who seeks then in designing pilgrims contradicts him ”(Deliberative analysis and argumentative woodcutter, d. Muhammad Adeel Abdul Aziz Ali, p. 195). IbnWalad adopted this strategy in all his issues, in which he responded to the file, as he was giving the initiative to cold speech, and who used to present Sibawayh’s words and then refute it. IbnWalad used to present the issue in a sequential manner, represented by putting forward the words of Sibawayh as mentioned by Al-Mubrrad in his book Matters of Mistake. Then he displays the revocation of the cooler for Sibawayh, after that, he commented on the matter by refuting the words of the radiator, and he revealed the flaws in his argument, to refute it, suggesting Sebwayh’s opinion on most issues.He presents the issue by saying Sibawayh on the tongue of Al-Mroudred (including his words in the chapter on his translation ...), then he displays the words of the coolant (Muhammad bin Yazid said ...), then he says: (Ahmed bin Muhammad said ...). 2. Siege and Restriction Strategy: The arguments are deliberate in this strategy, to reveal the flaws in the opponent's arguments in preparation for revealing them, then he "weaves a set of intellectual dilemmas for him with the intent to restrict him and withdraw his direction, during all this, he is keen to build a counter- thesis, he may deliberately turn the opponent’s results into introductions to it ”(Ibid, p. 196). IbnWalad used this strategy in many of his responses to the cooler, among the issues that IbnWalad besieged Al-Mroudar and narrowed down on all aspects of the issue, explaining their details. It is the cooler's objection to Sibawayh’s saying: “It is not permissible for anyone to place it in a position of duty, because there was a general denial in their words” (Al-Intisar, p. 53). Al-Mubarrad objected to Sibway’s words by saying: “It is not as he said, but no one has fallen into the position of all. On this, Al-Akhtal said (Al-BaytThi Al-Ramah in his office, Introduction and Explanation: Ahmad HasanBasaj, p. 94, and also attributed in the commentary of the verses of Sibawayh to Al-Siraafi, p. 179, and in the explanation of Al-Mufassal by IbnYaish, vol.1, p. 197, while Al-Serafi's attributed to Al-Akhtal in his commentary on Sibawayh Book Part 1, p. 318): Even dazzled, what was hidden from anyone ... except for someone who does not know the moon IbnWalad replied to him, by creating an intellectual dilemma for the pardon that corrupts his reasoning by saying: “Muhammad’s saying: If someone falls in the affirmative, if he is one in the meaning of all, he must say: A hundred people came to me, and I met twenty, so this is one in the meaning of all, and no one permits it. (That) was indicated by the corruption of his saying: “(Al- Intisar, p. 53). IbnWalad besieged the radiator by forcing him to say, that if he permitted to put someone in the offer. He permitted him to say: A hundred people came to me, and IbnWalad is tightening the cooler because this saying is not permitted by anyone, and if this is not permitted by anyone, then it indicates the corruption of his words, consequently, IbnWalad refuted the words of Al- Mubarrad by invalidating his reasoning.Because this inference leads to a statement that is not 16138 Al-Hajjaj's grammatical strategies of IbnWalad Al-Tamimiat his book Al-Intesar of SibawayhonAl-Mubarrad as a model PJAEE, 17 (7) (2020) permissible among grammarians.IbnWalad continues his tightening on the cooler by saying: “As for what he was quoted in the passport, which is the first one I met Zaid, it was not permissible to say this except to make someone in one meaning, as God said: (Say, He is God is one) and no one here is the one who falls into exile, and if their derivation is the same, Because the Arabs put them in a different meaning, and the same applies to the saying of al- Akhtal, meaning only for one who does not know the moon ”(Ibid, pp.