DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Engagement Report – Together We Can Seascale

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Engagement Report – Together We Can Seascale COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR COPELAND Meeting date: 11 April 2011 From: Chief Executive COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REPORT – TOGETHER WE CAN SEASCALE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 This reports provides members with a summary of the Seascale “Together We Can” activities which took place during March 2011. 2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS 2.1 The committee has the delegated executive function “to determine the level and nature of Neighbourhood Development work in the area”. 2.2 There are no equality implications arising out of this report. 3.0 RECOMMENDATION 3.1 That members note and comment as they see fit on the Appendices attached. 4.0 BACKGROUND 4.1 Copeland Local Committee has, for several years, approved and funded the provision of two “Together We Can” projects in communities across Copeland. 4.2 Members have previously received a report on the first project in 2010/11, Frizington. This report provides members with an early report back on the project carried out in Seascale during the week of 14th – 18th March 2011. 4.3 Appendix A reports on the programme of activities which took place under the “Together We Can” banner including some examples of the range of community issues which were reported to the team either in person or via returned survey forms whilst Appendix B gives feedback from the various organisations who took part in the “You Said; We Did” drop-in event. 4.4 The detail collected from community members is used: during the week to solve problems quickly reported to agencies for dealing with after the project week collated together and used to inform locality and area level planning 5.0 OPTIONS 5.1 Members may comment as the wish on this report. 6.0 RESOURCE AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS 6.1 Local Committee approved funding of £16,660 in June 2010 to support the delivery of the Together We Can initiative. 6.2 There has been additional resource commitment of officer time in support of this project. 6.3 No other additional resource implications arise from this report. 7.0 LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 7.1 The Constitution provides that to encourage community engagement and enable communities to make their voices heard, Local Committees may pursue local initiatives that will encourage and support local communities in their relationships with the Council, Council services and with other public bodies. [CW] 8.0 CONCLUSION 8.1 The “Together We Can” programme is a well regarded badge for a range of intensive activities carried out over a short period of time and involving a number of agencies in a distinct identified community. 8.2 Previous years‟ activities in Millom, Hensingham, Cleator Moor and Frizington have been welcomed by communities and partner agencies alike. Jill Stannard Chief Executive [24 March 2011] APPENDICES Appendix A: Report on Seascale Together We Can Week, 14 - 18 March 2011 Appendix B: Feedback from agencies at the “You Said, We Did” drop in. IMPLICATIONS Electoral Division(s): Seascale & Whicham * Please remove whichever option is not applicable Executive Decision No Key Decision No If a Key Decision, is the proposal published in the current Forward Plan? N/A Is the decision exempt from call-in on grounds of urgency? No If exempt from call-in, has the agreement of the Chair of the relevant N/A Overview and Scrutiny Committee been sought or obtained? Has this matter been considered by Overview and Scrutiny? No If so, give details below. Has an environmental or sustainability impact assessment been N/A undertaken? Has an equality impact assessment been undertaken? N/A N.B. If an executive decision is made, then a decision cannot be implemented until the expiry of the eighth working day after the date of the meeting – unless the decision is urgent and exempt from call-in and the Head of Member Services and Scrutiny has obtained the necessary approvals. PREVIOUS RELEVANT COUNCIL OR EXECUTIVE DECISIONS [including Local Committees] Copeland Local Committee 02.06.2010. CONSIDERATION BY OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY Not considered by Overview and Scrutiny. BACKGROUND PAPERS No background papers. Contact: Jonathan Marriott, 01946 505042 [email protected] Marilyn Pritchard 01946 505023 [email protected] Suzanne Cooper 01946505019 [email protected] Appendix A Seascale Together We Can, 14 - 19 March 2011 This report gives an overview of the Seascale Together We Can week, held from 14 – 19 March 2011. Following on from the Together We Can week delivered in Frizington in January 2011. The timing and content of these weeks has reflected the needs and wishes of the two communities, each profoundly affected by the West Cumbria shootings in June 2010. The week in Seascale was further affected by these events as the enquiry into the shootings was taking place whilst the TwC was happening, this did affect the type of activity we planned. Partners The Seascale week was coordinated by one Neighbourhood Development Officer and one Community Involvement Worker from the team, and involved the following organizations, in alphabetical order: Age UK Active for Life Age UK Promoting Independence & Prevention Project Connexions Cumbria – National Citizens Scheme Copeland Borough Council Coastal Initiative Copeland Borough Council Customer Services Copeland Borough Council Enforcement Team Copeland Borough Council Locality Team Copeland Borough Council Sports Development Copeland Borough Council Waste Management Services Copeland Borough Council Youth Engagement Copeland Citizen‟s Advice Bureau Copeland Community Fund Cumbria Constabulary Cumbria County Council Highways Cumbria County Council Library Service Cumbria County Council Neighbourhood Forums in Copeland Cumbria County Council Public Rights of Way Team Cumbria County Council Passenger Transport Cumbria County Council Trading Standards Cumbria County Council Community Waste Education Officer Cumbria Council for Voluntary Service Cumbria Fire and Rescue Service – Seascale Crew Seascale First Responders Seascale Parish Council Seascale Primary School Shackles Off Youth Centre Shanks Waste Management South Copeland Disability Group Ways into Successful Enterprise West Cumbria Carers Whitehaven, Egremont & District Credit Union Planning We attended a meeting of Seascale Parish Council in September to propose the week in Seascale, and discuss ideas they might have for the week. They came up with Timing – It was agreed to go for week commmencing 14 March 2011 Key Area of focus for the door to door - Hallsenna Road, Hallsenna Lane, Gosforth Road, Santon Way, Lingmell Crescent, Scawfell Crescent, Fell View Road, Wastwater Rise and The Drive Seascale PC were particularly keen to have a drop in information session with as wide a range of organisations and agencies available as possible. We attended a subsequent Parish Council meeting to firm up ideas and to progress planning, and asked the wider public for input and ideas at a special public meeting in November 2010. From this meeting a long list of issues and ideas was compiled and used as a basis to plan the week with partner organisations,. In parallel, we pulled together meetings of partner organisations to see what could be offered, and to build a programme to reach out into and across the community. It was noticeable that, following successes of our previous Together We Can weeks, more organisations were readily willing to commit to the week and the partnership Prior to its start, the Together We Can week was also publicised through the local media, through posters throughout the village and a display in the library, on the Seascale Parish Council Website, and by information through the doors of most of the households in the village. Delivery During the week all properties in the target area were door visited with a doorstep questionnaire, but as many residents were not in we actually knocked on most properties in the village, we achieved 110 replies. If we received no answer, or if residents preferred to answer later, we left the questionnaire with the option to return it to boxes in the Post Office, Library or School, or to post it back to our office. Quite a high proportion of the replies came by these routes – a significant indication that people did want a chance to have their say on local service delivery.12 people from 6 organisations took part in interviewing. The issues highlighted are now being collated for follow up. Many issues such as Highways defects were dealt with throughout the course of the week and the remaining issues have been, or are being, referred on to appropriate organisations. In conjunction with this, the recycling officers from Cumbria County Council and Shanks delivered recycling boxes and „hats‟ (covers) as they were requested. Throughout the week Cumbria Highways were busy fixing potholes, many as they were reported, and remedying other minor defects, including blocked gullies. The Fire and Rescue service provided individual household Fire Safety advice within the target area. Seascale Primary School were very involved in the Together we can week with activies been held everyday that week The week generated a real feel good factor in Seascale, and a core group of residents, including many members of Seascale Parish Council, stayed involved throughout the week. A visible difference has been made, Issues and priorities will be picked up by different partner organisations, and will inform future action – particularly important in the face of budget cuts. All the information from the week is now being collated to feed into future actions, and to feed back to the community of Seascale. Events Round up Area Walk – Monday 14 March Seascale Area Walk Monday 14 March Responses to the questionnaires showed that most residents like living in Seascale and there was an overall satisfaction with the local area. The main issues ranged from a better bus service especially on Sundays and a later service, dog mess on the beach and pavements, litter and the untidy area near the Pharmacy/Fire Station, speeding throughout the village, access under Arch hill, parking around the school and on pavements to requests for a swimming pool, local dentist, and better mobile phone signal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 551 22 October 2012 No. 53 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 22 October 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 679 22 OCTOBER 2012 680 Mr Hammond: I am grateful to my hon. Friend. He is House of Commons absolutely right. As we build our Army reserve to a level of trained strength of 30,000, it will be essential that we Monday 22 October 2012 capture the skills of regular Army leavers, not just to help us with the numbers but because of the resilience The House met at half-past Two o’clock that they will give to reserve forces. I promise him that that is what we will do. PRAYERS Nick Smith (Blaenau Gwent) (Lab): Following Labour’s [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] lead, employers such as John Lewis and O2 will guarantee to interview veterans applying for jobs. Will the Minister Oral Answers to Questions introduce this scheme to all public sector employers? Mr Hammond: One of the tasks that we have asked Lord Ashcroft to undertake is a discussion across DEFENCE Government and the wider public sector to see what more we can do to ensure that service leavers have the The Secretary of State was asked— very best opportunities in relation not only to employment Service Leavers (Support) but access to benefits and social housing—all the other things that they need. I assure the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2015 The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings Andrew D. Manor University of Central Florida Part of the Legal Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Manor, Andrew D., "The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings" (2015). HIM 1990-2015. 1872. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1872 THE INFLUENCE OF GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION ON RAMPAGE SHOOTINGS by ANDREW D. MANOR A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Legal Studies in the College of Health and Public Affairs and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2015 Thesis Chair: Dr. James Beckman Abstract The United States has experienced several mass shootings in the past few years. It has been averaging one shooting every week in 2015, and something must be done about it. This problem appears to be limited to the United States since several other nations have been able to minimize, and almost eliminate the number of mass shootings. By taking an analysis of the gun laws of the United States with those of Australia and Canada it can be concluded that some aspects of strict gun control can reduce the number of mass shootings.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory, Masculinity and Homicide-Suicide 2012.Pdf
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 40 (2012) 133e151 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijlcj Masculinity and homicide-suicide Marilyn Gregory* Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK 1. Introduction Since Ruth Cavan’s groundbreaking study of homicide followed by suicide in Chicago (Cavan, 1928), research mainly located within psychology and forensic pathology shows that homicide-suicide episodes, whilst uncommon, occur across a broad range of countries for which data have been collected. These include: Australia (Easteal, 1993; Carcach and Grabosky, 1998); England and Wales (West, 1967; Milroy, 1993; Barraclough and Harris, 2002; Flynn et al., 2009; Gregory and Milroy, 2010); Canada (Buteau et al., 1993; Gillespie et al., 1998); Finland (Kivivuori and Lehti (2003);France(Le Comte and Fornes, 1998); Hong Kong: (Beh et al., 2005); Iceland (Gudjonsson and Petursson, 1982); Israel (Landau, 1975); USA (Barber et al., 2008; Campinelli and Gilson, 2002; Hanzlick and Kopenen, 1994). Reviewing 17 studies from 10 countries, Coid (1983) found that although the rate of homicide varied widely between countries, the rate of homicide-suicide was much lessvariable.Itfollowedthatinthosecountrieswithhigher homicide rates, homicide-suicide as a percentage of homicide was smaller than in countries with lower homicide rates. Milroy (1995) reviewed the internationalliteratureagain,ana- lysing 27 studies from 17 countries and found these tendencies persisted. However, Cohen et al. (1998) found evidence to contradict this view, suggesting that homicide-suicide as apercentageoftotalhomicidesvarieswidelybetweencountries,fromaslittleas3%toas much as 60%. We know a good deal about the epidemiology of homicide-suicide from existing research (Harper and Voigt, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny County Sportsmen's League Legislative Committee Report
    Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League Legislative Committee Report July 2010 Issue 189 ALLEGHENY COUNTY SPORTSMEN LEAGUE ON THE INTERNET http://www.acslpa.org Contacts : Legislative Committee Chairman , Kim Stolfer (412.221.3346) - [email protected] Legislative Committee Vice-Chairman, Mike Christeson - [email protected] Founding Fathers: “Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers.” -- John Adams, Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765 House Bill 40 – Castle Doctrine –Update individual citizen's right to bear arms! The decision in the McDonald case regarding the Chicago handgun ban that has Leadership Sends HB 40 to the House been in effect since 1982 is, make no mistake about it, a Appropriations Committee to Die: landmark decision that will transform the issue of gun ownership. In addition, the coupling of this decision with the While the public's attention was distracted and captivated by Heller decision from two years ago regarding the Washington the torturous budget debate, House Bill 40 (Castle doctrine) was DC ban provides for an amazing level of clarity on such a quietly spirited into the House Appropriations Committee to controversial issue. what some political observers believe is to be left to a slow and If for no other reason , it will be amusing to watch the quiet death at the hands of the Pennsylvania House of American Civil Liberties Union try to wiggle out of being Representatives Democratic leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Youth Suicide in a Multi-Mediated World: the Construction of the Bridgend Problem in the British National Press
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Akrivos, Dimitrios (2015). Framing youth suicide in a multi-mediated world: the construction of the Bridgend problem in the British national press. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/13648/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] FRAMING YOUTH SUICIDE IN A MULTI-MEDIATED WORLD THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIDGEND PROBLEM IN THE BRITISH NATIONAL PRESS DIMITRIOS AKRIVOS PhD Thesis CITY UNIVERSITY LONDON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 2015 THE FOLLOWING PARTS OF THIS THESIS HAVE BEEN REDACTED FOR COPYRIGHT REASONS: p15, Fig 1.1 p214, Fig 8.8 p16, Fig 1.2 p216, Fig 8.9 p17, Fig
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 522 25 January 2011 No. 105 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 25 January 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 145 25 JANUARY 2011 146 that PCTs should be offering emerging consortia. Milton House of Commons Keynes PCT has confirmed that it will actively support Premier MK, one of two consortia in the area, with its Tuesday 25 January 2011 application to become a pathfinder, and that it is actively working with another consortium in the Milton Keynes area. The House met at half-past Two o’clock Stephen Mosley: Pathfinder consortia will play a crucial role in improving the NHS, so it is imperative that any PRAYERS problems are sorted out as quickly as possible. How does my right hon. Friend propose to help any pathfinder [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] consortium that finds itself in the unfortunate position of failing to deliver the results expected of it? Mr Lansley: My hon. Friend makes an important Oral Answers to Questions point. He will recall that before the election, the Select Committee on Health severely criticised the way in which primary care trusts were going about commissioning. We are looking to consortia because they are clinically HEALTH led and responsive to patients in designing far better clinical services, and they will have considerable support The Secretary of State was asked— in doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Firearms Control
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Firearms Control Third Report of Session 2010–2011 Volume I HC 447-I House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Firearms Control Third Report of Session 2010–2011 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/homeaffcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 December 2010 HC 447-I Published on 20 December 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £20.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abington) Mr Aidan Burley MP (Conservative, Cannock Chase) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following member was also a member of the committee during the parliament. Mary Macleod MP (Conservative, Brentford and Isleworth) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019 Newsletter
    SHEPLEY GROUP NEWS OCTOBER 2019 and other CNSL Partners to use for gathered to identify the improvement meetings and hot desks. opportunities. We now have an order to work with We have been working with the Rolls Royce to support some of their Houses of Parliament maintenance work on the Diesel Back-up scope team to provide more support at the at Hinkley Point C (HPC). We are Palace of Westminster. We have just providing engineering support to help started a new job on the Speaker with constructability in the design Court Canopy Restoration which may and are also providing front-end lead to additional opportunities in the documentation for the fi rst packages future. of work in January 2020. This is the installation of large diesel tanks in the We have also been providing additional basement of the buildings which will information to Westinghouse on the Introduction then be built round the tanks. new Nitrogen Plant Project, with hope that it may provide additional work for from Nick We are currently launching a new the team down at Springfi elds. service available to all employees – I attended a supplier day at Wick near ‘Health Assured’. It is a free 24-hour Finally, we are moving into the winter Dounreay earlier in September. This confi dential helpline which is available months with dark starts and fi nishes. included the fi rst Framework Steering if anybody wants to talk about stress, Please be careful how you get to Group with the Dounreay client and anxiety, debt, work, lifestyle addictions, and from work which may require other Dounreay Decommissioning relationships or legal matters.
    [Show full text]
  • KESWICK Mountain Rescue Team a Registered Charity Number 509860
    KESWICK Mountain Rescue Team A Registered Charity Number 509860 Annual Report 2011 Introduction www.keswickmrt.org.uk Grisedale Pike Venus Griffiths Website homepage Welcome to the 2011 Annual Report of For more information about the Team, Keswick Mountain Rescue Team. see www.keswickmrt.org.uk This is a record of the Team’s activities in 2010. Please support the Team through the links from the website to The Team operates in the area shown on the map on page 2. The Charities Aid Foundation and JustGiving. Sometimes the Team is needed elsewhere. And see “Please support us” on pages 38 and 39. Thanks Photographs The painting has been donated by Venus Griffiths. All photographs used in this report The framed original is for sale to the highest bidder. have been contributed It may be viewed at Derwent Frames, High Hill, Keswick. by Keswick Mountain Rescue Team members. All proceeds to Keswick Mountain Rescue Team. Keswick Mountain Rescue Team 2011 President: Mike Nixon MBE Deputy Team Leaders: Chris Gillyon, Roy Henderson Chris Higgins, Simon Hodgson Chairman: Alan Prescott Medical Officer: Dr Tim Hooper Secretary: Paul Cheshire Training Officers: Steven Hepburn, Nick Jones Treasurer: lan Wallace Radio Officer: Alan Prescott Spooney Green House Transport Officer: Allan Alcock Spooney Green Lane, Equipment Officers: Richard Gale, Nick Jones Keswick, Cumbria CA12 4PJ Base Officer: Paul Carter Team Leader: Mark Hodgson Social Secretary: Elly Whiteford Committee: Fiona Boyle, Paul Horder Report Editor: Peter Little Secretary (Meetings & Minutes):
    [Show full text]
  • Report Homicide and Suicide
    1 Report: Firearms in Europe Report: Firearms in Europe Homicide and Suicide 02.02.2016 Firearms United Katja Triebel reviewed by Dr. Jean Karl Soler MD PhD Follow this and additional works at: https://independent.academia.edu/KatjaTriebel Recommended Citation Triebel, Katja (2016) "Homicide and Suicide," Report: Firearms in Europe, http://bit.ly/1Oo1axX [Text eingeben] Seite 1 2 Report: Firearms in Europe Contents 1. Introduction _________________________________________________________________ 3 2. Fatal injuries (1998-2010) _______________________________________________________ 5 3. Data analysis _________________________________________________________________ 8 3.1. European Homicide Monitor ___________________________________________________ 9 4. Suicide _____________________________________________________________________ 10 4.1. Suicide in Europe by Eurosafe 4.2. Suicides in Europe by WHO and OECD ___________________________________________ 13 4.3. Suicide in the World _________________________________________________________ 14 5. Suicides with Firearms ________________________________________________________ 15 5.1. Can we use "Suicide by Firearm" as a proxy for Gun Ownership? 5.2. Can restricted access to firearms lower suicide rates? ______________________________ 16 5.3. Conclusion ________________________________________________________________ 19 6. Homicide ___________________________________________________________________ 20 6.1. Interpersonal violence by Eurosafe) 6.2. Homicide rates by Eurostat (2002-2008) _________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Armed to Kill a Comprehensive Analysis of the Guns Used in Public Mass Shootings in Europe Between 2009 and 2018
    REPORT Armed To Kill A comprehensive analysis of the guns used in public mass shootings in Europe between 2009 and 2018 Nils Duquet Nino Kbiltsetskhlashvili Isthiaq Khan The Flemish Peace Institute is an independent institute dedicated Eric Woods to peace research and hosted by the Flemish Parliament. REPORT Armed to Kill A comprehensive analysis of the guns used in public mass shootings in Europe between 2009 and 2018 Colophon Armed to kill A comprehensive analysis of the guns used in public mass shootings in Europe between 2009 and 2018 ISBN 9789078864974 © Flemish Peace Institute, Brussels, 3 October 2019 Authors Nils Duquet, Nino Kbiltsetskhlashvili, Isthiaq Khan & Eric Woods Final Editing Alex Potter Lay-out Karakters Printing Artoos Introduction Disclaimer While the Flemish Peace Institute has exercised the utmost care in the redaction of this report, it cannot be deemed or held liable for possible mistakes or oversights with regard to completeness. At the same time, the Institute shall not assume any form of liability for the use that a reader may make of this document. 2 \ 79 Table of contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodological framework 7 2.1 Definition and scope 7 2.2 Data collection 8 3 Case studies of public mass shootings 11 3.1 Winnenden (Germany, March 2009) 12 3.2 Espoo (Finland, December 2009) 13 3.3 Cumbria (United Kingdom, June 2010) 14 3.4 Devínska Nová Ves (Slovakia, August 2010) 15 3.5 Alphen aan den Rijn (The Netherlands, April 2011) 16 3.6 Utøya (Norway, July 2011) 18 3.7 Liège (Belgium, December 2011) 21 3.8 Toulouse-Montauban
    [Show full text]
  • Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2010/11
    Home Office Statistical Bulletin Statistical Bulletins are prepared by staff in Home Office Statistics under Homicides, Firearm Offences the National Statistics Code of and Intimate Violence Practice and can be downloaded from both the UK Statistics Authority 2010/11: website and the Home Office website: Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2010/11 http://www.statistics.gov.uk http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/science- Kevin Smith (Ed.), Sarah Osborne, Ivy Lau and Andrew Britton research © Crown Copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/o pen-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London, TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] January 2012 02/12 ISSN 1759-7005 ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 2 Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2010/11: Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2010/11 Kevin Smith (Ed.), Sarah Osborne, Ivy Lau and Andrew Britton ISSN 1759-7005 ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 January 2012 3 Acknowledgements This publication and the accompanying web tables have been prepared by staff in the Crime Statistics Programme, which is part of the Home Office Statistics Unit of Home Office Science. The editor and authors are grateful for the support received from: Maya Bhudia, Richard Cheeseman, Kathryn Coleman, John Flatley, Jacqueline Hoare, Jenny Innes, Deborah Lader, Jennifer Parfrement-Hopkins, and Paul Robb.
    [Show full text]