Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Tuesday Volume 522 25 January 2011 No. 105 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 25 January 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 145 25 JANUARY 2011 146 that PCTs should be offering emerging consortia. Milton House of Commons Keynes PCT has confirmed that it will actively support Premier MK, one of two consortia in the area, with its Tuesday 25 January 2011 application to become a pathfinder, and that it is actively working with another consortium in the Milton Keynes area. The House met at half-past Two o’clock Stephen Mosley: Pathfinder consortia will play a crucial role in improving the NHS, so it is imperative that any PRAYERS problems are sorted out as quickly as possible. How does my right hon. Friend propose to help any pathfinder [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] consortium that finds itself in the unfortunate position of failing to deliver the results expected of it? Mr Lansley: My hon. Friend makes an important Oral Answers to Questions point. He will recall that before the election, the Select Committee on Health severely criticised the way in which primary care trusts were going about commissioning. We are looking to consortia because they are clinically HEALTH led and responsive to patients in designing far better clinical services, and they will have considerable support The Secretary of State was asked— in doing so. Over the next two years, we will enable them to develop support arrangements, whether through GP Commissioning existing primary care trust teams, local authorities, the NHS commissioning board, or a range of voluntary 1. Mark Lancaster (Milton Keynes North) (Con): and independent sector organisations. What recent progress he has made in introducing GP Nick de Bois: Will the Secretary of State outline the commissioning consortia. [35632] role that charities and voluntary organisations will play 3. Stephen Mosley (City of Chester) (Con): What under GP commissioning to ensure that the needs and recent progress he has made in introducing GP views of patients are at the heart of services? commissioning consortia. [35634] Mr Lansley: To give my hon. Friend one example, last 6. Nick de Bois (Enfield North) (Con): What recent Friday I spoke to the Motor Neurone Disease Association, progress he has made in introducing GP commissioning which has developed a commissioning support organisation consortia. [35637] with the Multiple Sclerosis Society and Parkinson’s UK. The voluntary sector can therefore be involved 8. Mr Matthew Offord (Hendon) (Con): What recent directly in helping GP consortia to commission for progress he has made in introducing GP commissioning those critical diseases more effectively. My hon. Friend consortia. [35639] might have seen what Sir Stephen Bubb, the chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary 11. Christopher Pincher (Tamworth) (Con): What Organisations, said last week: recent progress he has made in introducing GP “These reforms could herald a new and dynamic relationship commissioning consortia. [35642] between local GPs and charities that both deliver good services and act as a powerful voice for patients.” The Secretary of State for Health (Mr Andrew Lansley): Last week, I announced the second wave of GP-led Mr Offord: My constituents in Hendon are eager to pathfinder consortia. There are now 141 groups of see the improvements in health services that I believe GP practices piloting the future GP commissioning GP commissioning will bring about. Will my right hon. arrangements. Those groups are made up of more than Friend give examples of where GPs have had the freedoms 4,000 GP practices, with over half the population starting and responsibilities that we can expect in Hendon? to benefit from services that better meet their needs and improve outcomes for patients. The Health and Social Mr Lansley: My hon. Friend might like to speak to Care Bill, which had its First Reading last week, sets general practitioners in Redbridge in London who, as a out the legislative framework that supports our reforms. pathfinder consortium, have been pioneering GP-led commissioning for 18 months. They have redesigned care Mark Lancaster: Consortia in Milton Keynes have for patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease, been given £1 per patient as a transition fund. That and are shifting care in ophthalmology and dermatology money is most welcome. It will rise to £2 per head next to primary care settings. They are demonstrating how year. The problem, however, is that the fund is proving this form of locally and clinically-led commissioning is hard to access because of the bureaucratic nature of the more responsive to patients and more effective. local primary care trust. Will the Secretary of State look into that and ensure that the money is accessible? Christopher Pincher: As we shift from PCTs commissioning services to GP consortia doing so, can Mr Lansley: I entirely understand my hon. Friend’s my right hon. Friend confirm that the important work point. The PCT’s role is to support the development of done by pharmacies, such as providing anti-smoking consortia, not inhibit it. The operating framework that clinics and the supervised consumption of drug substitutes, was published last month sets out the range of support will not be left out in the cold? 147 Oral Answers25 JANUARY 2011 Oral Answers 148 Mr Lansley: My hon. Friend enables me to say that I managing and monitoring of hundreds of commissioning and my colleagues entirely understand and endorse the contracts will be done not by GPs but in their name, stronger role that pharmacies can play, including by either by the people who do it now in primary care assisting with the provision of services such as minor trusts or by the big health companies that are already ailments services and medicines use reviews, which will hard-selling the service to new GP consortia. Is he not be commissioned through arrangements led by the NHS deliberately disguising the true purpose of his changes, commissioning board. In addition, the services that which is to open up all parts of the NHS to big private he describes, such as stop smoking services, will be health care companies? commissioned as part of the public health efforts, which will be led by local authorities through their local health Mr Lansley: On the contrary, the purposes of the Bill improvement plans. are very clear to see—for example, the duty to improve quality and raise standards throughout the health service. Emma Reynolds (Wolverhampton North East) (Lab): I hope that the shadow Secretary of State will acknowledge Will the Secretary of State comment on the apparent that putting clinical leadership at the heart of the system conflict between, on the one hand, a general practitioner is essential. I entirely understand that leadership is not being an advocate for their patient and taking purely the same thing as management, as do general practitioners. clinical decisions and, on the other hand, GPs having to The Prime Minister and I will meet the first wave of allocate resources in the new system? Will that conflict pathfinder consortia tomorrow, and we will support not lead to a breakdown of trust in the relationship them in taking clinical leadership in designing services between the GP and their patients? for patients and bringing to bear the best management support in doing so. Mr Lansley: I am afraid the hon. Lady sees a conflict where, to GPs, there is none. It is their responsibility— John Healey: Why will the right hon. Gentleman not [Interruption.] No, their first duty is always to their be straight with the public? I have with me the White patients, whose best interests they must secure. When Paper—57 pages and only three references to the market, she has an opportunity to look at the Health and Social all of them to the social market. He talks about GP Care Bill, which we published last week, she will see that commissioning, but not about the hard-line political it makes very clear the duty to improve quality and ideology that underlines these changes. The Bill puts no continuously to improve standards. We all know that we limit on the use of NHS beds and staff to treat private have to achieve that with finite resources, but we will do patients, it puts no limits on big private health care that much better when we let clinical leaders influence companies undercutting and undermining local hospitals, directly how those resources are used rather than letting and it puts at the heart of the new system an economic a management bureaucracy tell them how to do it. regulator charged not with improving services but with Debbie Abrahams (Oldham East and Saddleworth) guaranteeing and enforcing competition. Is this NHS (Lab): Can the Secretary of State explain why, at a time reorganisation not like an iceberg, with the substantial when front-line NHS staff in my constituency and ideological bulk being kept out of the public’s sight? elsewhere across the country are in fear of their jobs, it is proposed that the NHS commissioning board will be Mr Lansley: The shadow Secretary of State cannot able to make bonus payments to a GP consortium if, to actually criticise what we put forward in the White quote the Bill, Paper or the Bill and is resorting to inventing something “it considers that the consortium has performed well”, else and attacking that.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 551 22 October 2012 No. 53 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 22 October 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 679 22 OCTOBER 2012 680 Mr Hammond: I am grateful to my hon. Friend. He is House of Commons absolutely right. As we build our Army reserve to a level of trained strength of 30,000, it will be essential that we Monday 22 October 2012 capture the skills of regular Army leavers, not just to help us with the numbers but because of the resilience The House met at half-past Two o’clock that they will give to reserve forces. I promise him that that is what we will do. PRAYERS Nick Smith (Blaenau Gwent) (Lab): Following Labour’s [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] lead, employers such as John Lewis and O2 will guarantee to interview veterans applying for jobs. Will the Minister Oral Answers to Questions introduce this scheme to all public sector employers? Mr Hammond: One of the tasks that we have asked Lord Ashcroft to undertake is a discussion across DEFENCE Government and the wider public sector to see what more we can do to ensure that service leavers have the The Secretary of State was asked— very best opportunities in relation not only to employment Service Leavers (Support) but access to benefits and social housing—all the other things that they need. I assure the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2015 The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings Andrew D. Manor University of Central Florida Part of the Legal Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Manor, Andrew D., "The Influence of Gun Control Legislation on Rampage Shootings" (2015). HIM 1990-2015. 1872. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1872 THE INFLUENCE OF GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION ON RAMPAGE SHOOTINGS by ANDREW D. MANOR A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Legal Studies in the College of Health and Public Affairs and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2015 Thesis Chair: Dr. James Beckman Abstract The United States has experienced several mass shootings in the past few years. It has been averaging one shooting every week in 2015, and something must be done about it. This problem appears to be limited to the United States since several other nations have been able to minimize, and almost eliminate the number of mass shootings. By taking an analysis of the gun laws of the United States with those of Australia and Canada it can be concluded that some aspects of strict gun control can reduce the number of mass shootings.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory, Masculinity and Homicide-Suicide 2012.Pdf
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 40 (2012) 133e151 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijlcj Masculinity and homicide-suicide Marilyn Gregory* Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Elmfield, Northumberland Road, Sheffield S10 2TU, UK 1. Introduction Since Ruth Cavan’s groundbreaking study of homicide followed by suicide in Chicago (Cavan, 1928), research mainly located within psychology and forensic pathology shows that homicide-suicide episodes, whilst uncommon, occur across a broad range of countries for which data have been collected. These include: Australia (Easteal, 1993; Carcach and Grabosky, 1998); England and Wales (West, 1967; Milroy, 1993; Barraclough and Harris, 2002; Flynn et al., 2009; Gregory and Milroy, 2010); Canada (Buteau et al., 1993; Gillespie et al., 1998); Finland (Kivivuori and Lehti (2003);France(Le Comte and Fornes, 1998); Hong Kong: (Beh et al., 2005); Iceland (Gudjonsson and Petursson, 1982); Israel (Landau, 1975); USA (Barber et al., 2008; Campinelli and Gilson, 2002; Hanzlick and Kopenen, 1994). Reviewing 17 studies from 10 countries, Coid (1983) found that although the rate of homicide varied widely between countries, the rate of homicide-suicide was much lessvariable.Itfollowedthatinthosecountrieswithhigher homicide rates, homicide-suicide as a percentage of homicide was smaller than in countries with lower homicide rates. Milroy (1995) reviewed the internationalliteratureagain,ana- lysing 27 studies from 17 countries and found these tendencies persisted. However, Cohen et al. (1998) found evidence to contradict this view, suggesting that homicide-suicide as apercentageoftotalhomicidesvarieswidelybetweencountries,fromaslittleas3%toas much as 60%. We know a good deal about the epidemiology of homicide-suicide from existing research (Harper and Voigt, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Allegheny County Sportsmen's League Legislative Committee Report
    Allegheny County Sportsmen’s League Legislative Committee Report July 2010 Issue 189 ALLEGHENY COUNTY SPORTSMEN LEAGUE ON THE INTERNET http://www.acslpa.org Contacts : Legislative Committee Chairman , Kim Stolfer (412.221.3346) - [email protected] Legislative Committee Vice-Chairman, Mike Christeson - [email protected] Founding Fathers: “Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right, from the frame of their nature, to knowledge, as their great Creator, who does nothing in vain, has given them understandings, and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge; I mean, of the characters and conduct of their rulers.” -- John Adams, Dissertation on Canon and Feudal Law, 1765 House Bill 40 – Castle Doctrine –Update individual citizen's right to bear arms! The decision in the McDonald case regarding the Chicago handgun ban that has Leadership Sends HB 40 to the House been in effect since 1982 is, make no mistake about it, a Appropriations Committee to Die: landmark decision that will transform the issue of gun ownership. In addition, the coupling of this decision with the While the public's attention was distracted and captivated by Heller decision from two years ago regarding the Washington the torturous budget debate, House Bill 40 (Castle doctrine) was DC ban provides for an amazing level of clarity on such a quietly spirited into the House Appropriations Committee to controversial issue. what some political observers believe is to be left to a slow and If for no other reason , it will be amusing to watch the quiet death at the hands of the Pennsylvania House of American Civil Liberties Union try to wiggle out of being Representatives Democratic leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Youth Suicide in a Multi-Mediated World: the Construction of the Bridgend Problem in the British National Press
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Akrivos, Dimitrios (2015). Framing youth suicide in a multi-mediated world: the construction of the Bridgend problem in the British national press. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/13648/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] FRAMING YOUTH SUICIDE IN A MULTI-MEDIATED WORLD THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRIDGEND PROBLEM IN THE BRITISH NATIONAL PRESS DIMITRIOS AKRIVOS PhD Thesis CITY UNIVERSITY LONDON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 2015 THE FOLLOWING PARTS OF THIS THESIS HAVE BEEN REDACTED FOR COPYRIGHT REASONS: p15, Fig 1.1 p214, Fig 8.8 p16, Fig 1.2 p216, Fig 8.9 p17, Fig
    [Show full text]
  • Firearms Control
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Firearms Control Third Report of Session 2010–2011 Volume I HC 447-I House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Firearms Control Third Report of Session 2010–2011 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/homeaffcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 December 2010 HC 447-I Published on 20 December 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £20.00 The Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abington) Mr Aidan Burley MP (Conservative, Cannock Chase) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following member was also a member of the committee during the parliament. Mary Macleod MP (Conservative, Brentford and Isleworth) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2019 Newsletter
    SHEPLEY GROUP NEWS OCTOBER 2019 and other CNSL Partners to use for gathered to identify the improvement meetings and hot desks. opportunities. We now have an order to work with We have been working with the Rolls Royce to support some of their Houses of Parliament maintenance work on the Diesel Back-up scope team to provide more support at the at Hinkley Point C (HPC). We are Palace of Westminster. We have just providing engineering support to help started a new job on the Speaker with constructability in the design Court Canopy Restoration which may and are also providing front-end lead to additional opportunities in the documentation for the fi rst packages future. of work in January 2020. This is the installation of large diesel tanks in the We have also been providing additional basement of the buildings which will information to Westinghouse on the Introduction then be built round the tanks. new Nitrogen Plant Project, with hope that it may provide additional work for from Nick We are currently launching a new the team down at Springfi elds. service available to all employees – I attended a supplier day at Wick near ‘Health Assured’. It is a free 24-hour Finally, we are moving into the winter Dounreay earlier in September. This confi dential helpline which is available months with dark starts and fi nishes. included the fi rst Framework Steering if anybody wants to talk about stress, Please be careful how you get to Group with the Dounreay client and anxiety, debt, work, lifestyle addictions, and from work which may require other Dounreay Decommissioning relationships or legal matters.
    [Show full text]
  • KESWICK Mountain Rescue Team a Registered Charity Number 509860
    KESWICK Mountain Rescue Team A Registered Charity Number 509860 Annual Report 2011 Introduction www.keswickmrt.org.uk Grisedale Pike Venus Griffiths Website homepage Welcome to the 2011 Annual Report of For more information about the Team, Keswick Mountain Rescue Team. see www.keswickmrt.org.uk This is a record of the Team’s activities in 2010. Please support the Team through the links from the website to The Team operates in the area shown on the map on page 2. The Charities Aid Foundation and JustGiving. Sometimes the Team is needed elsewhere. And see “Please support us” on pages 38 and 39. Thanks Photographs The painting has been donated by Venus Griffiths. All photographs used in this report The framed original is for sale to the highest bidder. have been contributed It may be viewed at Derwent Frames, High Hill, Keswick. by Keswick Mountain Rescue Team members. All proceeds to Keswick Mountain Rescue Team. Keswick Mountain Rescue Team 2011 President: Mike Nixon MBE Deputy Team Leaders: Chris Gillyon, Roy Henderson Chris Higgins, Simon Hodgson Chairman: Alan Prescott Medical Officer: Dr Tim Hooper Secretary: Paul Cheshire Training Officers: Steven Hepburn, Nick Jones Treasurer: lan Wallace Radio Officer: Alan Prescott Spooney Green House Transport Officer: Allan Alcock Spooney Green Lane, Equipment Officers: Richard Gale, Nick Jones Keswick, Cumbria CA12 4PJ Base Officer: Paul Carter Team Leader: Mark Hodgson Social Secretary: Elly Whiteford Committee: Fiona Boyle, Paul Horder Report Editor: Peter Little Secretary (Meetings & Minutes):
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement Report – Together We Can Seascale
    COUNTY COUNCIL LOCAL COMMITTEE FOR COPELAND Meeting date: 11 April 2011 From: Chief Executive COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT REPORT – TOGETHER WE CAN SEASCALE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 This reports provides members with a summary of the Seascale “Together We Can” activities which took place during March 2011. 2.0 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND EQUALITY IMPLICATIONS 2.1 The committee has the delegated executive function “to determine the level and nature of Neighbourhood Development work in the area”. 2.2 There are no equality implications arising out of this report. 3.0 RECOMMENDATION 3.1 That members note and comment as they see fit on the Appendices attached. 4.0 BACKGROUND 4.1 Copeland Local Committee has, for several years, approved and funded the provision of two “Together We Can” projects in communities across Copeland. 4.2 Members have previously received a report on the first project in 2010/11, Frizington. This report provides members with an early report back on the project carried out in Seascale during the week of 14th – 18th March 2011. 4.3 Appendix A reports on the programme of activities which took place under the “Together We Can” banner including some examples of the range of community issues which were reported to the team either in person or via returned survey forms whilst Appendix B gives feedback from the various organisations who took part in the “You Said; We Did” drop-in event. 4.4 The detail collected from community members is used: during the week to solve problems quickly reported to agencies for dealing with after the project week collated together and used to inform locality and area level planning 5.0 OPTIONS 5.1 Members may comment as the wish on this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Homicide and Suicide
    1 Report: Firearms in Europe Report: Firearms in Europe Homicide and Suicide 02.02.2016 Firearms United Katja Triebel reviewed by Dr. Jean Karl Soler MD PhD Follow this and additional works at: https://independent.academia.edu/KatjaTriebel Recommended Citation Triebel, Katja (2016) "Homicide and Suicide," Report: Firearms in Europe, http://bit.ly/1Oo1axX [Text eingeben] Seite 1 2 Report: Firearms in Europe Contents 1. Introduction _________________________________________________________________ 3 2. Fatal injuries (1998-2010) _______________________________________________________ 5 3. Data analysis _________________________________________________________________ 8 3.1. European Homicide Monitor ___________________________________________________ 9 4. Suicide _____________________________________________________________________ 10 4.1. Suicide in Europe by Eurosafe 4.2. Suicides in Europe by WHO and OECD ___________________________________________ 13 4.3. Suicide in the World _________________________________________________________ 14 5. Suicides with Firearms ________________________________________________________ 15 5.1. Can we use "Suicide by Firearm" as a proxy for Gun Ownership? 5.2. Can restricted access to firearms lower suicide rates? ______________________________ 16 5.3. Conclusion ________________________________________________________________ 19 6. Homicide ___________________________________________________________________ 20 6.1. Interpersonal violence by Eurosafe) 6.2. Homicide rates by Eurostat (2002-2008) _________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Armed to Kill a Comprehensive Analysis of the Guns Used in Public Mass Shootings in Europe Between 2009 and 2018
    REPORT Armed To Kill A comprehensive analysis of the guns used in public mass shootings in Europe between 2009 and 2018 Nils Duquet Nino Kbiltsetskhlashvili Isthiaq Khan The Flemish Peace Institute is an independent institute dedicated Eric Woods to peace research and hosted by the Flemish Parliament. REPORT Armed to Kill A comprehensive analysis of the guns used in public mass shootings in Europe between 2009 and 2018 Colophon Armed to kill A comprehensive analysis of the guns used in public mass shootings in Europe between 2009 and 2018 ISBN 9789078864974 © Flemish Peace Institute, Brussels, 3 October 2019 Authors Nils Duquet, Nino Kbiltsetskhlashvili, Isthiaq Khan & Eric Woods Final Editing Alex Potter Lay-out Karakters Printing Artoos Introduction Disclaimer While the Flemish Peace Institute has exercised the utmost care in the redaction of this report, it cannot be deemed or held liable for possible mistakes or oversights with regard to completeness. At the same time, the Institute shall not assume any form of liability for the use that a reader may make of this document. 2 \ 79 Table of contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Methodological framework 7 2.1 Definition and scope 7 2.2 Data collection 8 3 Case studies of public mass shootings 11 3.1 Winnenden (Germany, March 2009) 12 3.2 Espoo (Finland, December 2009) 13 3.3 Cumbria (United Kingdom, June 2010) 14 3.4 Devínska Nová Ves (Slovakia, August 2010) 15 3.5 Alphen aan den Rijn (The Netherlands, April 2011) 16 3.6 Utøya (Norway, July 2011) 18 3.7 Liège (Belgium, December 2011) 21 3.8 Toulouse-Montauban
    [Show full text]
  • Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2010/11
    Home Office Statistical Bulletin Statistical Bulletins are prepared by staff in Home Office Statistics under Homicides, Firearm Offences the National Statistics Code of and Intimate Violence Practice and can be downloaded from both the UK Statistics Authority 2010/11: website and the Home Office website: Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2010/11 http://www.statistics.gov.uk http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/science- Kevin Smith (Ed.), Sarah Osborne, Ivy Lau and Andrew Britton research © Crown Copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/o pen-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London, TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] January 2012 02/12 ISSN 1759-7005 ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 2 Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2010/11: Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2010/11 Kevin Smith (Ed.), Sarah Osborne, Ivy Lau and Andrew Britton ISSN 1759-7005 ISBN 978 1 84987 623 0 January 2012 3 Acknowledgements This publication and the accompanying web tables have been prepared by staff in the Crime Statistics Programme, which is part of the Home Office Statistics Unit of Home Office Science. The editor and authors are grateful for the support received from: Maya Bhudia, Richard Cheeseman, Kathryn Coleman, John Flatley, Jacqueline Hoare, Jenny Innes, Deborah Lader, Jennifer Parfrement-Hopkins, and Paul Robb.
    [Show full text]