DOCSLIB.ORG

Otter Mound Preserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Otter Mound Preserve Otter Mound Preserve Land Management Plan Managed by: Conservation Collier Program Collier County January 2008 – January 2018 (10 yr plan) Prepared by: Collier County Facilities Management Department January 2008 Land Management Plan – Otter Mound Preserve Otter Mound Preserve Land Management Plan Executive Summary Lead Agency: Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Conservation Collier Program Properties included in this Plan: four parcels – Folio #21840000029, 21840000045, 21840000061, and 25830400004 Acreage: 2.46 acres Management Responsibilities: Collier County Conservation Collier Program has oversight responsibility with day to day responsibilities shared by the City of Marco Island under an Inter-local Agreement attached as Appendix 1. Designated Land Use: Conservation and natural resource-based recreation Unique Features: Mature, tropical hardwood hammock Archaeological/Historical: Calusa shell mound, historic whelk shell terracing, and historic outhouse Management Goals: Goal 1: Maintain the property in its natural condition prior to modern development. Goal 2: Eliminate or reduce human impacts to indigenous plant and animal life. Goal 3: Maintain the trail to provide a safe and pleasant visitor experience. Goal 4: Protect Archaeological, Historical and Cultural Resources. Goal 5: Facilitate uses of the site for educational purposes. Goal 6: Provide a plan for security and disaster preparedness Acquisition Needs: None Surplus Lands: None Public Involvement: Public meeting(s) to be held fall 2007 with residents from surrounding homes, the City of Marco Island, the Marco Island Historical Society, the Southwest Florida Archaeological Society, and the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. Conservation Collier Program II Land Management Plan – Otter Mound Preserve Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................... V LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................ V 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of the Project and Scope of Plan ........................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Regional Significance of Otter Mound Preserve ............................................................................................. 4 1.4 Nearby Public Lands and Designated Water Resources .................................................................................. 4 1.5 Management Authority .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Public Involvement .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Physiography ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Topography and Geomorphology ............................................................................................................ 7 2.1.2 Geology .................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Soils .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.4 Hydrology/Water Management .............................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Natural Communities ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Shell Mound………………………………………………………………………………………………………11 2.3.2 Existing Habitat Conditions 2007……………………………………………………………………………..13 2.4 Plant and Animal Species .............................................................................................................................. 15 2.5 Listed Species ................................................................................................................................................ 16 2.5.1 Listed Plant Species ................................................................................................................................ 16 2.5.2 Listed Wildlife Species ............................................................................................................................ 19 2.6 Invasive Non-native and Problem Species..................................................................................................... 20 2.7 Archaeological, Historical and Cultural Resources ....................................................................................... 21 2.8 Scenic Resources ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3.0 USE OF THE PROPERTY ................................................................................................................................. 23 3.1 Previous Use and Development ..................................................................................................................... 23 Conservation Collier Program III Land Management Plan – Otter Mound Preserve 3.2 Current Public Use and Land Uses ................................................................................................................ 23 3.3 Adjacent Land Uses. ...................................................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Prospective Land Acquisitions ...................................................................................................................... 28 4.0 MANAGEMENT ISSUES, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................... 28 4.1 Program Framework and Goals ..................................................................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Management Activities to Protect/Restore the Resource ...................................................................... 28 4.1.2 Manager ................................................................................................................................................ 28 4.1.3 Preserve Rules and Regulations ............................................................................................................ 29 4.2 Desired Future Conditions ............................................................................................................................. 29 4.3 Major Accomplishments During Previous Years .......................................................................................... 29 4.4 Goals and Objectives for 10 year period ........................................................................................................ 29 4.5 Public Use Facilities ...................................................................................................................................... 37 4.6 Operational Plan for Otter Mound Preserve .................................................................................................. 38 4.6.1 Maintenance .................................................................................................................... 38 4.6.2 Estimated Annual Costs and Funding Sources ...................................................................................... 38 4.6.3. Potential for Contracting Restoration and Management Activities by Private Vendors ....................... 39 4.7 Partnerships and Regional Coordination ....................................................................................................... 40 4.7.1 Interdepartmental Partnerships and Agreements ................................................................................... 40 4.7.2 Cooperating Agencies and Organizations .............................................................................................. 40 5.0 LITERATURE CITED ....................................................................................................................................... 41 Conservation Collier Program IV Land Management Plan – Otter Mound Preserve List of Tables Table 1: Acquisition History and Status for Otter Mound Preserve .............................................................................. 1 Table 2: Public Lands and Designated Water Resources Located Near Otter Mound Preserve ...................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Insights Into the Mode of Action of a "Lachrymatory Factor Synthase"
    Phytochemistry 72 (2011) 1939–1946 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Phytochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phytochem First insights into the mode of action of a ‘‘lachrymatory factor synthase’’ – Implications for the mechanism of lachrymator formation in Petiveria alliacea, Allium cepa and Nectaroscordum species ⇑ Quan He a, Roman Kubec b, Abhijit P. Jadhav a, Rabi A. Musah a, a Department of Chemistry, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA b Department of Applied Chemistry, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05 Cˇeské Budeˇjovice, Czech Republic article info abstract Article history: A study of an enzyme that reacts with the sulfenic acid produced by the alliinase in Petiveria alliacea L. Received 16 December 2010 (Phytolaccaceae) to yield the P. alliacea lachrymator (phenylmethanethial S-oxide) showed the protein Received in revised form 11 July 2011 to be a dehydrogenase. It functions by abstracting hydride from sulfenic acids of appropriate structure Available online 15 August 2011 to form their corresponding sulfines. Successful hydride abstraction is dependent upon the presence of a benzyl group on the sulfur to stabilize the intermediate formed on abstraction of hydride. This dehy- Keywords: drogenase activity contrasts with that of the lachrymatory factor synthase (LFS) found in onion, which Petiveria alliacea catalyzes the rearrangement of 1-propenesulfenic acid to (Z)-propanethial S-oxide, the onion lachryma- Phytolaccaceae tor. Based on the type of reaction it catalyzes, the onion LFS should be classified as an isomerase and Lachrymatory factor synthase Sulfenic acid would be called a ‘‘sulfenic acid isomerase’’, whereas the P. alliacea LFS would be termed a ‘‘sulfenic acid Sulfenic acid dehydrogenase dehydrogenase’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trees of Mexico: Diversity, Distribution, Uses and Conservation
    Native trees of Mexico: diversity, distribution, uses and conservation Oswaldo Tellez1,*, Efisio Mattana2,*, Mauricio Diazgranados2, Nicola Kühn2, Elena Castillo-Lorenzo2, Rafael Lira1, Leobardo Montes-Leyva1, Isela Rodriguez1, Cesar Mateo Flores Ortiz1, Michael Way2, Patricia Dávila1 and Tiziana Ulian2 1 Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Av. De los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Iztacala Tlalnepantla, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Estado de México, Mexico 2 Wellcome Trust Millennium Building, RH17 6TN, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Ardingly, West Sussex, United Kingdom * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT Background. Mexico is one of the most floristically rich countries in the world. Despite significant contributions made on the understanding of its unique flora, the knowledge on its diversity, geographic distribution and human uses, is still largely fragmented. Unfortunately, deforestation is heavily impacting this country and native tree species are under threat. The loss of trees has a direct impact on vital ecosystem services, affecting the natural capital of Mexico and people's livelihoods. Given the importance of trees in Mexico for many aspects of human well-being, it is critical to have a more complete understanding of their diversity, distribution, traditional uses and conservation status. We aimed to produce the most comprehensive database and catalogue on native trees of Mexico by filling those gaps, to support their in situ and ex situ conservation, promote their sustainable use, and inform reforestation and livelihoods programmes. Methods. A database with all the tree species reported for Mexico was prepared by compiling information from herbaria and reviewing the available floras. Species names were reconciled and various specialised sources were used to extract additional species information, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Petiveria Alliacea
    Fitoterapia 76 (2005) 599–607 www.elsevier.com/locate/fitote Leaf and stem morphoanatomy of Petiveria alliacea M.R. Duarte a,*, J.F. Lopes b a Laborato´rio de Farmacognosia, Departamento de Farma´cia, Universidade Federal do Parana´, Rua Pref. Lotha´rio Meissner, 3400, CEP 80210-170, Curitiba, Parana´, Brazil b Scholarship student of PIBIC/CNPq, Universidade Federal do Parana´, Rua Pref. Lotha´rio Meissner, 3400, CEP 80210-170, Curitiba, Parana´, Brazil Received 17 January 2005; accepted 16 May 2005 Available online 19 October 2005 Abstract Petiveria alliacea is a perennial herb native to the Amazonian region and used in traditional medicine for different purposes, such as diuretic, antispasmodic and anti-inflammatory. The morphoanatomical characterization of the leaf and stem was carried out, in order to contribute to the medicinal plant identification. The plant material was fixed, freehand sectioned and stained either with toluidine blue or astra blue and basic fuchsine. Microchemical tests were also applied. The leaf is simple, alternate and elliptic. The blade exhibits paracytic stomata on the abaxial side, non-glandular trichomes and dorsiventral mesophyll. The midrib is biconvex and the petiole is plain-convex, both traversed by collateral vascular bundles adjoined with sclerenchymatic caps. The stem, in incipient secondary growth, presents epidermis, angular collenchyma, starch sheath and collateral vascular organization. Several prisms of calcium oxalate are seen in the leaf and stem. D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Petiveria alliacea; Morphoanatomy * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.R. Duarte). 0367-326X/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida1
    ENH854 Low-Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida1 Jody Haynes, John McLaughlin, Laura Vasquez, Adrian Hunsberger2 Introduction regular watering, pruning, or spraying—to remain healthy and to maintain an acceptable aesthetic This publication was developed in response to quality. A low-maintenance plant has low fertilizer requests from participants in the Florida Yards & requirements and few pest and disease problems. In Neighborhoods (FYN) program in Miami-Dade addition, low-maintenance plants suitable for south County for a list of recommended landscape plants Florida must also be adapted to—or at least suitable for south Florida. The resulting list includes tolerate—our poor, alkaline, sand- or limestone-based over 350 low-maintenance plants. The following soils. information is included for each species: common name, scientific name, maximum size, growth rate An additional criterion for the plants on this list (vines only), light preference, salt tolerance, and was that they are not listed as being invasive by the other useful characteristics. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC, 2001), or restricted by any federal, state, or local laws Criteria (Burks, 2000). Miami-Dade County does have restrictions for planting certain species within 500 This section will describe the criteria by which feet of native habitats they are known to invade plants were selected. It is important to note, first, that (Miami-Dade County, 2001); caution statements are even the most drought-tolerant plants require provided for these species. watering during the establishment period. Although this period varies among species and site conditions, Both native and non-native species are included some general rules for container-grown plants have herein, with native plants denoted by †.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Tree Snail Species Conservation Measures and Permitting
    SPECIES CONSERVATION MEASURES AND PERMITTING GUIDELINES Effective December, 2020 Florida Tree Snail Liguus fasciatus Species Overview Status: Removed from Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species List. Current Protections • 68A-4.001, F.A.C., General Prohibitions and Photograph by Randy Grau, FWC. Requirement – Prohibits the take, transport, sale, and possession of wildlife. • 68A-1.004, F.A.C., Take – The term take shall include taking, attempting to take, pursuing, hunting, molesting, capturing, or killing any wildlife or freshwater fish, or their nests or eggs by any means whether or not such actions result in obtaining possession of such wildlife or freshwater fish or their nests or eggs. Biological Background This section describes the biological background for this species and provides context for the following sections. It focuses on the habitats that support the Florida tree snail, and the threats faced by the species. Florida tree snails (Liguus fasciatus) have historically been found in Collier, Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and Monroe counties (Deisler-Seno 1994). Currently the species is primarily known from Miami-Dade, Monroe, and Collier counties (Emmel and Cotter 1995; see range map). The Florida tree snail has a conical shell 40 to 70 mm (1.6 to 2.7 in) in length. The shell color is extremely variable and can be matte or glossy (Pilsbry 1946). There are 58 named color morphs of the Florida tree snail (Jones et al. 1981, Roth and Bogan 1984, Emmel and Cotter 1995; Figure 1). Research shows very low genetic variation and suggests that all color morphs belong to a single species, Liguus fasciatus (Hillis 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Forest Community Delineation Methods
    Natural Forest Community Delineation Methods Keith A. Bradley and George D. Gann February 2, 2005 The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue; Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Introduction The Natural Forest Community (NFC) system was established in 1984 under ordinance 89-9, Chapter 24-60 of the Miami-Dade County Code. The ordinance provides legal protection for sites designated by the county as NFCs: “Natural Forest Community shall mean all stands of trees (including their associated understory) which were designated as Natural Forest Communities on the Dade County Natural Forest Community Maps and approved by the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to Resolution No. R-1764-84.” Factors for reviewing proposed Natural Forest Community sites in the original ordinance included: 1) Presence of endangered, threatened, rare, or endemic species (plants or animals); 2) Plant species diversity on the site; 3) Size of trees; 4) Size of site; 5) Wildlife habitat value; 6) Geological features; and 7) Percentage of site covered by non-native plant species. As required by the ordinance, quantitative evaluation criteria were developed by DERM incorporating the above factors, including separate criteria for the delineation of hardwood hammocks and pinelands. These criteria have become outdated as more scientifically rigorous criteria for delineating natural areas have been developed since 1984, primarily relating to delineation of wetland habitats. Some of the methods used to delineate NFCs by DERM proved to be ineffective including the establishment of transects to measure plant species cover and diversity on each site. As specified in section 151 of the ordinance, evaluation criteria may be revised occasionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Glauca (L.) Moench Fabaceae - Mimosoideae
    Acacia glauca (L.) Moench Fabaceae - Mimosoideae LOCAL NAMES English (wild dividivi,redwood); French (amourette); Javanese (mlanding sabrang,mlanding merah) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Acacia glauca is an erect, unarmed shrub or small tree, 1-3(-5) m tall; crown open, branches many, terete, sparsely pubescent to glabrous, younger twigs more strigose; bark dark red. Leaves bipinnately or sometimes tripinnately compound, pinnae in 2-10 pairs, 4-9 cm long, rachis 8-12 cm long, glandless; leaflets 10-30 pairs per pinna, opposite, oblong-lanceolate, 4-10 mm x 1-2 mm, unequal sided, base rounded, top blunt with acute tip, hairy to glabrescent; stipules lanceolate, early caducous. Inflorescence a short, sometimes subcapitate, 20-40-flowered spike, 2-6 together in upper axils, the uppermost arranged in racemes; peduncle up to 2.5 cm long, pedicel 1-2 mm, articulated; flowers 5-merous, bisexual, white turning yellowish; calyx campanulate, 0.5-1 mm long, 5-lobed; corolla tubular, 5-lobed, 2-4 mm long; stamens numerous, ovary stipitate with 5 mm long style. Fruit a flat, membranous pod, oblong to strap-shaped, 1.5-10 cm x 0.5-2 cm, stalk about 1 cm long, apiculate, glossy brown, 1-8 seeded, valves swollen where seeds develop, transversely veined along the margins. Seeds ovoid to lenticular, brown. The generic name ‘acacia’ comes from the Greek word ‘akis’, meaning point or barb. BIOLOGY Flowering and fruiting may start as early as 6 months and flowering occurs throughout the year. Agroforestry Database 4.0 (Orwa et al.2009) Page 1 of 5 Acacia glauca (L.) Moench Fabaceae - Mimosoideae ECOLOGY A.
    [Show full text]
  • Petiveria Alliacea) Poisoning in Cattle Alfonso Ruiz Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1972 Clinical, morphological, histochemical and clinical pathological studies of anamú (Petiveria alliacea) poisoning in cattle Alfonso Ruiz Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Veterinary Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Ruiz, Alfonso, "Clinical, morphological, histochemical and clinical pathological studies of anamú (Petiveria alliacea) poisoning in cattle" (1972). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5227. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5227 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This dissertation was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Woody and Herbaceous Plants Native to Haiti for Use in Miami-Dade Landscapes1
    Woody and Herbaceous Plants Native to Haiti For use in Miami-Dade Landscapes1 Haiti occupies the western one third of the island of Hispaniola with the Dominican Republic the remainder. Of all the islands within the Caribbean basin Hispaniola possesses the most varied flora after that of Cuba. The plants contained in this review have been recorded as native to Haiti, though some may now have been extirpated due in large part to severe deforestation. Less than 1.5% of the country’s original tree-cover remains. Haiti’s future is critically tied to re- forestation; loss of tree cover has been so profound that exotic fast growing trees, rather than native species, are being used to halt soil erosion and lessen the risk of mudslides. For more information concerning Haiti’s ecological plight consult references at the end of this document. For present purposes all of the trees listed below are native to Haiti, which is why non-natives such as mango (the most widely planted tree) and other important trees such as citrus, kassod tree (Senna siamea) and lead tree (Leucanea leucocephala) are not included. The latter two trees are among the fast growing species used for re-forestation. The Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History’s Flora of the West Indies was an invaluable tool in assessing the range of plants native to Haiti. Not surprisingly many of the listed trees and shrubs 1 John McLaughlin Ph.D. U.F./Miami-Dade County Extension Office, Homestead, FL 33030 Page | 1 are found in other parts of the Caribbean with some also native to South Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Petiveria Alliacea (Linneaus) Leaf and Root Bark
    Akintan et al. The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology (2021) 82:5 The Journal of Basic https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-020-00199-3 and Applied Zoology RESEARCH Open Access Efficacy of Petiveria Alliacea (Linneaus) leaf and root bark powder in the control of filariasis vector Culex Quinquefasciatus Michael Olarewaju Akintan1* , Joseph Onaolapo Akinneye2 and Oluwatosin Betty Ilelakinwa1 Abstract Background: Mosquitoes are vectors of parasitic diseases such as malaria, lymphatic filariasis, yellow fever, and dengue fever among others. They are well known as public enemies for their noise nuisance, biting annoyance, sleeplessness, allergic reactions, and diseases transmission during the biting and feeding activities. This then necessitate the search for insecticides of plant origin which are bio-degradable, non-toxic, and readily available for man use. Result: This study, evaluated the fumigant efficacy of the powder of P. alliacea to control the adult stage of Culex mosquito. Powder of Petiveria alliacea were administered at different dose of (1 g, 2 g, 3 g, 4 g, and 5 g), respectively. Result obtained shows the fumigant effect of the powder were effective with percentage mortality of 18.33–60.00% for the leaf powder and 23.30–71.60% for the root powder within 2 h post-treatment period (P < 0.05). The synergistic effect of the leaf and root powder was also investigated. The lethal dosage (LD50) of the leaf, root, and synergistic effect of leaf and root bark powder required to kill 50% of the adult Culex quinquefasciatus was 3.76 g, 2.86 g, and 2.63 g, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood and Stem Anatomy of Petiveria and Rivina
    IAWA Journal, Vol. 19 (4),1998: 383-391 WOOD AND STEM ANATOMY OF PETIVERIA AND RIVINA (CARYOPHYLLALES); SYSTEMATIC IMPLICATIONS by Sherwin Carlquist Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, 1212 Mission Canyon Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93105, U.S.A. SUMMARY Petiveria and Rivina have been placed by various authors close to each other within Phytolaccaceae; widely separated from each other but both within Phytolaccaceae; and within a segregate family (Rivinaceae) but still within the order Caryophyllales. Wood of these monotypic genera proves to be alike in salient qualitative and even quantitative features, including presence of a second cambium, vessel morphology and pit size, nonbordered perforation plates, vasicentric axial parenchyma type, fiber-tracheids with vestigially bordered pits and starch contents, nar­ row multiseriate rays plus a few uniseriate rays, ray cells predominant­ ly upright and with thin lignified walls and starch content, and presence of both large styloids and packets of coarse raphides in secondary phloem. Although further data are desirable, wood and stern data do not strongly support separation of Petiveria and Rivina from Phyto­ laccaceae. Quantitative wood features correspond to the short-lived perennial habit ofboth genera, and are indicative ofaxeromorphic wood pattern. Key words: Caryophyllales, Centrospermae, ecological wood anatomy, Phytolaccaceae, successive cambia, systematic wood anatomy. INTRODUCTION Phytolaccaceae s.l. have been treated quite variously with respect to generic contents. Gyrostemonaceae, once included in Phytolaccaceae, contain gIucosinolates and have other features that require their transfer to Capparales (Goldblatt et al. 1976; Tobe & Raven 1991; Rodman et al. 1994). Other familial segregates from Phytolaccaceae recognized by most recent authors include Achatocarpaceae, Agdestidaceae, Bar­ beuiaceae, and Stegnospermataceae (Reimerl 1934; Rodman et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Mimosa Tenuiflora on Larval Establishment of Haemonchus
    Veterinary Parasitology 196 (2013) 341–346 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Contents lists available at ScienceDirect provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Veterinary Parasitology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vetpar Effects of Mimosa tenuiflora on larval establishment of Haemonchus contortus in sheep L.M.B. Oliveira a, I.T.F. Macedo a, L.S. Vieira b, A.L.F. Camurc¸ a-Vasconcelos a, A.R. Tomé a, R.A. Sampaio a, H. Louvandini c, C.M.L. Bevilaqua a,∗ a Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Brazil b Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária/Caprinos e Ovinos, Brazil c Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil article info abstract Article history: Anthelmintic resistance has limited the ability to control the gastrointestinal nematodes Received 26 October 2012 of small ruminants and has therefore awakened an interest in the study of tanniferous Received in revised form 3 April 2013 plants as a source of anthelmintics. This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of Accepted 6 April 2013 Mimosa tenuiflora intake, a tanniferous plant that is fed to small ruminants in northeastern Brazil, on the larval establishment of Haemonchus contortus in sheep. In this experiment, 18 Keywords: nematode-free sheep were divided into three groups (n = 6) according to live weight. Group Anthelmintic 1 was fed M. tenuiflora leaves; Group 2 was fed M. tenuiflora stems; Group 3 served as the In vivo control group and was fed Cynodon dactylon, a plant with low levels of tannins.
    [Show full text]