Madrone's Breeding Bird Atlas II
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
VOLUME 50 Summer 2017 Number 6 Madrone’s Breeding Bird Atlas II Survey Methods and Early Results by Gordon Beebe Beginning with this issue of Leaves, we will pres- and subsequent development have affected if you prefer). Both are similar, but there are dif- ent some of the results from our latest Breeding native species that reside in the county by re- ferences that need to be factored in. In the first Bird Atlas (Atlas) survey. Many Madrone mem- ducing the habitat available to many of them survey, there were 105 volunteers who dedicated bers are familiar with the Atlas, and quite a few for feeding and nesting. Other factors, such as 3,962 hours out in the field in the Atlas blocks, of them have participated in the surveys, but the recent drought, climate change, new intro- observing all of the birds they saw during the some members may not know what an Atlas is, duced species, and others, all have an effect on breeding season. In the second survey, there so a brief history and description is in order. Atlas the birds that we know and love. were 106 volunteers (some of them participat- surveys have been conducted in Britain and parts We can look at some figures from both Atlases ed in both surveys), who devoted 9,283 hours of the United States since the late 1970’s. The to get an idea of some of the changes, but first, in the field, well over twice as many hours! purpose of an Atlas is to acquire baseline data on a note of caution: at the moment, comparing Somehow, that will need to be adjusted for, the species of birds that breed in a certain area; in the two survey results is a bit like comparing as more time in the field usually (not always) our case, Sonoma County. As with other Atlases, apples and oranges (or Kinglets and Vireos, leads to more observations, so it can look like the entire county was divided into five kilometer Continued on page 2 (about three miles) square “blocks” in the 1980’s in preparation for our first Atlas, for which the GENERAL MEETING breeding bird survey work was completed be- tween 1986 and 1991. Monday, September 18, 2017, 7:00 PM First United Methodist Church • 1551 Montgomery Drive, Santa Rosa That’s right, this is the second Atlas to be com- “A Look into the Daily Lives of Herons and Egrets and Conservation of Bay Area Wetlands” pleted in Sonoma County. It took four more Herons and egrets are recognized around the world as symbols of years for the data from the first Atlas to be com- wetland health. Such symbolism is well-substantiated by the sensitivity piled and printed in book form. Here is an ex- of these birds to wetland quality and by their roles as powerful cerpt, from page two, “And what is next? One wetland predators. As a result, the habits and needs of herons of the main values of an atlas is the possibility and egrets provide key perspectives for protecting the wetland of comparing this baseline data with data from landscapes in our region. This program offers an inside look future studies. At its September 1992 meeting, into the lives of these elegant birds, with insights from ongoing the North American Ornithological Atlas Com- studies at Audubon Canyon Ranch (ACR) on the conservation mittee (NORAC) recommended repeating atlas of wetlands, the effects of climate change, and the protection studies every 25 years.” And so we have, and right of heronries. John P. Kelley, Director of Conservation Science at ACR, will also hare early updates on ACR’s new Heron and on time! Great Egret stretch display Egret Telemetry Project, which uses BPS transmitters and Courtesy of Keith Carver We are hoping to publish the data from the sec- observations of known individuals to track the daily lives ond Atlas sooner than four years from now, but of Great Egrets. In addition, John will discuss recent work on shorebird responses to tidal there is a lot of work to be done. Not only are we marsh restoration and the dependence of wintering waterbirds on the seasonal spawning working on publishing the results, we will also be activities of Pacific herring. comparing the results with the first Atlas. This John Kelly has been studying heron and egrets throughout the San Francisco Bay area for nearly 30 is no easy task, as there are many differences years. As ACR’s Director of Conservation Science, John manages ACR’s Cypress Grove Research between the two surveys. A lot has happened in Center on Tomales Bay, works on local and regional conservation issues, and serves as a scientific the last 25 years. Sonoma County’s population advisor for a variety of conservation agencies and organizations. His scientific work is focused on the in 1991 was 397,937. In 2015, it had grown habitat relationships, population ecology, behaviors, and energetics of coastal and estuarine birds. to 500,292. This increased population pressure MADRONE LEAVES BREEDING BIRD ATLAS II In the next installment, we will review two Continued from page 1 species to see if we can learn more about their Appreciated Donations population trends: Mourning Dove, and Eur- we actually found more birds breeding, when asian Collared-Dove. One thing we do know for In Memory of... what really happened was we had more time to sure is that the Eurasian Collared-Doves were find the ones that were already there. not in Sonoma County back in the 1980’s. They Betty Burridge by Bill & Paget Lenarz A good example were still working their way across the country from their introduction on the East Coast in of this is the Bob Dyer number of spe- the 1970’s. Also, it is quite clear to anyone hav- by Bill & Paget Lenarz cies confirmed as ing participated in the second Atlas survey, that breeding birds. one did not have to look hard to find evidence Donald McCarthy By the way, we of breeding Eurasian Collared-Doves, so in this by Pamela Conley had very specific case, at least, the greater number of hours spent Laurence Taylor criteria for deter- atlasing was not the reason why this new species by Pamela Conley mining whether popped up. Are they pushing Mourning Doves by Gloria Richardson a bird was actu- out of their habitat, and reducing their numbers, ally breeding as many people fear? We’ll see if we can answer Bushtit or not. It may that question, and others, next time. particular breeding behaviors, opened a new and rich Courtesy of Gordon Beebe world. Early on, I learned to keep track of loca- seem obvious, And now that we have finished collecting the tions of singing birds. By returning to these loca- but just seeing a pair of birds of the same spe- Breeding Bird Survey data, we thought it would tions, I might hear singing again, an indicator of cies together, or even seeing them mate, does be a good time to share some of the stories of ‘probable’ breeding. And more than that, it gave not itself confirm breeding. They might be in what it was like, and what we learned in the pro- me spots to watch to confirm breeding. Was that the final stages of spring migration, leaving the cess. Many of the volunteers who spent hours Pacific-slope Flycatcher carrying nesting materi- county before finally settling down to nest. We in the field seeking to confirm breeding birds in al? Where was its nest? What was that goldfinch need to find an active nest, or see parents car- their blocks agree: it was a transformative learning up to? What were those Steller’s Jays doing with rying food, or feeding the young, etc., for it to experience for them. Our first article is by David mud and detritus in their bills? I learned to be be confirmed as a breeding bird. With those Leland, who not only spent many hours atlas- criteria in mind, in 1995, the results were ing several blocks over the last few years, but is 148 species confirmed in Sonoma County. By currently working on maps that will show where 2016, we confirmed 161 species. Does this each species was found. If you participated in our mean that birds are doing better in the county, Breeding Bird Atlas update and are inspired by his since more species have been found, or is it article, please consider sharing your experiences simply that because we devoted so many more of any length, in a future edition of the Leaves. hours looking, we were bound to find some We look forward to hearing from you! new species? At any rate, here is a list of the new species confirmed between 2011-2016: Barred Owl, Bald Eagle, Black Rail, Band- How the Breeding Bird tailed Pigeon, Blue-winged Teal, Cattle Egret, Canyon Wren, Common Gallinule, Common Atlas Has Enhanced Murre, Eurasian Collared-Dove, Great-tailed My Birding Lesser Kiskadee Courtesy of Ken Wilson Grackle, Marbled Murrelet, Mandarin Duck, Mute Swan, Ridgway’s Rail, Rock Wren, Sooty by David Leland quiet and patient and let the birds show me what Grouse, Sora, and Swainson’s Hawk. The Sonoma County they were doing. Later in the cycle, with parents foraging and ferrying food back to nestlings, there One thing the Atlas does not tell us is much of Breeding Bird Atlas were many cues. I might hear nestlings begging, anything about numbers of birds. We do know, field work has drawn and use that to home in on a nest.