Report Update 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Drug Class Review on Newer Antihistamines Final Report Update 1 April 2006 Original Report Date: November 2004 A literature scan of this topic is done periodically The purpose of this report is to make available information regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety profiles of different drugs within pharmaceutical classes. Reports are not usage guidelines, nor should they be read as an endorsement of, or recommendation for, any particular drug, use or approach. Oregon Health & Science University does not recommend or endorse any guideline or recommendation developed by users of these reports. Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Mark Helfand, MD, MPH, Director Copyright © 2006 by Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon 97201. All rights reserved. Note: A scan of the medical literature relating to the topic is done periodically (see http://www.ohsu.edu/ohsuedu/research/policycenter/DERP/about/methods.cfm for scanning process description). Upon review of the last scan, the Drug Effectiveness Review Project governance group elected not to proceed with another full update of this report. Some portions of the report may not be up to date. Prior version of this report can be accessed at the DERP website. Final Report Update #1 Drug Effectiveness Review Project TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................................4 SCOPE AND KEY QUESTIONS.............................................................................................................................6 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................................................7 LITERATURE SEARCH..........................................................................................................................................7 STUDY SELECTION AND INCLUSION CRITERIA............................................................................................7 1. Populations.............................................................................................................................................................7 2. Interventions...........................................................................................................................................................7 3. Outcomes................................................................................................................................................................7 4. Settings ...................................................................................................................................................................8 5. Study design............................................................................................................................................................8 DATA ABSTRACTION ...........................................................................................................................................8 VALIDITY ASSESSMENT......................................................................................................................................9 DATA SYNTHESIS..................................................................................................................................................9 RESULTS...........................................................................................................................................................................9 KEY QUESTION 1. FOR OUTPATIENTS WITH SAR, PAR, OR URTICARIA, DO NEWER ANTIHISTAMINES DIFFER IN EFFECTIVENESS? ...........................................................................................................................9 Adults...........................................................................................................................................................................9 Children.....................................................................................................................................................................17 KEY QUESTION 2. FOR OUTPATIENTS WITH SAR, PAR OR CIU DO NEWER ANTIHISTAMINES DIFFER IN SAFETY OR ADVERSE EFFECTS? ............................................................................................................24 Adults.........................................................................................................................................................................24 Children.....................................................................................................................................................................30 KEY QUESTION 3. ARE THERE SUBGROUPS OF PATIENTS BASED ON DEMOGRAPHICS (AGE, RACIAL GROUPS, GENDER), CONCOMITANT MEDICATIONS (DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS), CO- MORBIDITIES (DRUG-DISEASE INTERACTIONS OR PREGNANCY), FOR WHICH ONE NEWER ANTIHISTAMINE IS MORE EFFECTIVE OR ASSOCIATED WITH FEWER ADVERSE EFFECTS?.......34 SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................................................35 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................................................................40 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................................42 IN TEXT TABLES TABLE 1. OUTCOMES FROM HEAD-TO-HEAD TRIALS IN ADULTS WITH SAR*.....................................................................10 TABLE 2. HEAD-TO-HEAD AND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN ADULTS WITH SAR......................................................11 TABLE 3. ACTIVE-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN ADULTS WITH SAR..........................................................................................11 TABLE 4. OUTCOMES FROM ACTIVE-CONTROLLED AND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN ADULTS WITH SAR ................12 TABLE 5. OUTCOMES FROM TRIALS IN ADULTS WITH PAR*...............................................................................................14 TABLE 6. HEAD-TO-HEAD AND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN ADULTS WITH URTICARIA ............................................16 TABLE 7. OUTCOMES FROM TRIALS IN ADULTS WITH URTICARIA .......................................................................................16 TABLE 8. HEAD-TO-HEAD AND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CHILDREN WITH SAR ..................................................18 TABLE 9.ACTIVE-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CHILDREN WITH SAR.......................................................................................18 TABLE 10. OUTCOMES FROM TRIALS IN CHILDREN WITH SAR ...........................................................................................18 TABLE 11. HEAD-TO-HEAD AND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CHILDREN WITH PAR................................................20 TABLE 12. ACTIVE-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN CHILDREN WITH PAR ....................................................................................20 TABLE 13. OUTCOMES FROM TRIALS IN CHILDREN WITH PAR* .........................................................................................21 TABLE 14. OUTCOMES FROM TRIALS IN CHILDREN WITH URTICARIA*...............................................................................23 TABLE 15. ADVERSE EVENTS FROM HEAD-TO-HEAD AND ACTIVE-CONTROLLED TRIALS IN ADULTS FROM THE ORIGINAL REPORT.......................................................................................................................................................................25 TABLE 16. ADVERSE EVENTS FROM STUDIES IN ADULTS (INCLUDES ONLY STUDIES FROM UPDATE 2003-2005)* ..............28 TABLE 17. ADVERSE EVENTS FROM STUDIES IN CHILDREN.................................................................................................31 TABLE 18. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE...........................................................................................................................35 Newer Antihistamines Page 2 of 63 Final Report Update #1 Drug Effectiveness Review Project FIGURES FIGURE 1. LITERATURE SEARCH RESULTS ...................................................................................................................54 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR SECOND GENERATION ANTIHISTAMINES ......................................................55 APPENDIX B. QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODS FOR DRUG CLASS REVIEWS FOR THE DRUG EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW PROJECT...............................................................................................................................................................57 APPENDIX C. POOR QUALITY STUDIES........................................................................................................................61 APPENDIX D. ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT ..................................................................................................63 Suggested citation for this report: Drug Class Review on Newer Antihistamines. Final Report Update 1. http://www.ohsu.edu/drugeffectiveness/reports/final.cfm Funding: The funding source, the Center for Evidence-based Policy, is supported by 17 organizations, including 15 state Medicaid programs. These organizations selected the topic and had input into the Key Questions