Final Wildlife Hazard Assessment Falcon Field Airport Mesa, Maricopa County, Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Wildlife Hazard Assessment Falcon Field Airport Mesa, Maricopa County, Arizona Final Wildlife Hazard Assessment Falcon Field Airport Mesa, Maricopa County, Arizona 4800 E. Falcon Drive Meza, Arizona PREPARED BY: WITH ASSISTANCE FROM: June 2016 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Acknowledgments Successful wildlife hazard monitoring requires cooperation from many members of the airport community. Mead & Hunt, Inc. would like to thank Corrine Nystrom, Airport Manager, Brad Hagan, Operations Supervisor, and the entire staff of the Falcon Field Airport for their ongoing assistance throughout the 12- month monitoring period associated with preparation of this Wildlife Hazard Assessment. Final Wildlife Hazard Assessment June 2016 Falcon Field Airport THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Final Wildlife Hazard Assessment June 2016 Falcon Field Airport Table of Contents Page Chapter 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Overview of Wildlife Hazards to Aircraft.............................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Safety Effects ......................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Economic Losses ................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Regulatory Background ...................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Wildlife Hazard Assessment Process and Contents .............................................. 3 1.2.2 Wildlife Hazard Management Plan ......................................................................... 4 1.3 Wildlife Hazard Strike History at Falcon Field Airport ......................................................... 5 Chapter 2. Site Background ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Airport Facilities ................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Airport Setting ................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Wildlife Attractants in the Airport Vicinity .......................................................................... 15 2.4 Ongoing Wildlife Hazard Management Efforts .................................................................. 15 2.5 Monitoring Approach ......................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 3. Regulatory Context and Applicable Regulations ............................................................... 17 3.1 Federal Regulations Pertaining to Wildlife Management .................................................. 17 3.1.1 Clean Water Act (Sections 404, 402, and 401) ................................................... 17 3.1.2 Endangered Species Act ..................................................................................... 18 3.1.3 Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act ....................................................................... 19 3.1.4 Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act ................................................................ 19 3.1.5 Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 ........................................................................ 19 3.1.6 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ........................................... 20 3.1.7 National Environmental Policy Act ....................................................................... 20 3.1.8 Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management ............................................... 21 3.2 State of Arizona Laws and Regulations ............................................................................ 21 3.2.1 Arizona Revised Statute Title 17, Arizona Game and Fish .................................. 21 3.2.2 Herbicide and Pesticide Use ................................................................................ 21 3.3 Legal Status of Key Species ............................................................................................. 22 Chapter 4. Field Survey Methods ........................................................................................................... 23 4.1 Preliminary Site Reconnaissance Visit ............................................................................. 23 4.2 Twice-Monthly Wildlife Monitoring Surveys ...................................................................... 25 4.3 Small Mammal Surveys .................................................................................................... 25 4.4 Spotlight Surveys .............................................................................................................. 25 4.5 Game Camera Surveys .................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 5. Results and Discussions ...................................................................................................... 29 5.1 Avian Surveys ................................................................................................................... 31 5.1.1 All Species Combined .......................................................................................... 31 5.1.2 Waterfowl ............................................................................................................. 34 5.1.3. Starlings and Blackbirds ...................................................................................... 36 Final Wildlife Hazard Assessment i June 2016 Falcon Field Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.1.4 Doves and Pigeons .............................................................................................. 39 5.1.5 Swallows .............................................................................................................. 41 5.1.6 Shorebirds ............................................................................................................ 43 5.1.7 Sparrows and Finches ......................................................................................... 45 5.1.8 Corvids ................................................................................................................. 47 5.1.9 Raptors (Hawks, Owls, Falcons, and Vultures) ................................................... 48 5.1.10 Songbirds ............................................................................................................. 51 5.2 Mammal Surveys .............................................................................................................. 52 5.2.1 Small Mammal Survey Results ............................................................................ 52 5.2.2 Night Spotlight Survey Results ............................................................................ 53 5.2.3 Game Camera Survey Results ............................................................................ 53 5.2.4 Mammals Observed During Daytime Surveys ..................................................... 54 Chapter 6. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................. 57 6.1 Overall Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 57 6.2 Develop a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan/Program ................................................... 57 6.2.1 Establish a Formal Wildlife Hazard Management Program ................................. 58 6.2.2 Establish a Wildlife Hazard Working Group ......................................................... 59 6.2.3 Obtain Permits to Manage Wildlife....................................................................... 59 6.2.4 Train Personnel in Species Identification and Wildlife Harassment Procedures ........................................................................................................... 60 6.2.5 Obtain Wildlife Hazard Management Supplies .................................................... 60 6.2.6 Record and Maintain Wildlife Strike Information .................................................. 61 6.2.7 Review Land Use Changes On and Near the Airport .......................................... 61 6.3 Develop and Implement Ongoing Wildlife Hazard Management Policies and Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 62 6.3.1 Implement a Wildlife Hazard Reporting and Communications Protocol .............. 62 6.3.2 Continue to Monitor Wildlife Populations and Use Patterns ................................ 64 6.3.3 Adopt a Zero-Tolerance Policy towards Hazardous Wildlife ............................... 64 6.3.4 Improve Reporting of Wildlife Strikes and Harassment Actions and Wildlife Strikes .................................................................................................................. 65 6.3.5 Maintain Records of Wildlife Management Efforts ............................................... 66 6.4 Implement Site-Specific Recommendations ..................................................................... 66 6.4.1 Modify Habitats/Features or Monitor Locations that Attract Hazardous Wildlife .................................................................................................................. 67 6.4.2 Continue to Maintain and Inspect the Perimeter Fence....................................... 68 6.4.2 Remove Citrus
Recommended publications
  • Goldwater Range Tour Backcountry Fly-In to Payson Johnathan The
    In this issue: Goldwater Range Tour Backcountry Fly-in to Payson Johnathan the Brave Winter Flying February 2018 APA NEWSLETTER _________________________________________________________ President’s Report Tommy Thomason, APA President .......................................... 2 Executive Director’s Report Jim Timm, APA Executive Director ...................................... 3-5 Grapevine Recap Mark Spencer, APA Vice President ...................................... 6-7 February Aviation Accident Summary Jim Timm, APA Executive Director ...................................... 8-9 GAJSC Topic of the Month Maintenance Placards ............................................................ 10 Spring Getaway to El Fuerte, Mexico! Brad Lawrence........................................................................ 11 — FEATURED — Johnathan the Brave Andrew Vogeney .............................................................. 13-15 Cottonwood Fly-In & Safety Seminar Timothy M Pebler............................................................. 16-17 Kingman Airport, Kingman Arizona Brian Schober ................................................................... 18-19 Payson Fly-In - Backcountry for Everyone! James Nebrig .................................................................... 21-22 Goldwater Range Tour Recap Mary & Susan ................................................................... 23-24 — SHORT FINAL — Winter Flying Howard Deevers ............................................................... 25-26 GAARMS: Symposium in
    [Show full text]
  • Rob Harrison Press Release
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contacts: Rob Harrison or Susan Newman-Harrison Phone: 909.626.7442 AEROBATIC PERFORMER ROB HARRISON – THE TUMBLING BEAR RARELY UPRIGHT That Rob Harrison would be popping in and out of puffs of white smoke, spinning, diving and twisting through the air in a specially built monoplane, repeatedly contorting his body to resist up to eight times his body weight in pressure, was unthinkable on that first flight. Then, his Dad, a career Naval officer, was at the controls of a Piper Cub, and 6-year-old Rob was scared. Now, nearly six decades later, the Claremont, CA resident, better known in airshow circles as “The Tumbling Bear,” remembers that first flight. Remembers, sure; dwells upon it, no. That’s typical. This is a guy who rarely looks back, always forward. There’s the next show, the next new move, the next generation he hopes to pass along his positive attitudes on experimentation and achievement. Fear is also a distant memory. There’s no place for it now, not with the massive rush of adrenaline that accompanies each 1 Rob Harrison Airshows | 1275 N. Indian Hill Blvd. | Claremont, California 91711 | Phone (909) 626-7442 | Fax (909) 626-2906 | e-mail: [email protected] flight, the intense concentration required to complete each move, and the enormous physical pressure while airborne. Besides, he says, “Fear is the enemy of safety.” The Tumbling Bear, all 6-foot and 250 pounds of him, has been a marquee airshow attraction since 1993 when he made the decision to embark on a new career after 28 years with the United States Forest Service, where he was responsible for the technical aspects of firefighting airplanes and helicopters.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 City of Gustavus Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Gustavus Hazard Mitigation Plan
    2019 CITY OF GUSTAVUS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF GUSTAVUS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 2019 ALL-HAZARDS MITIGATION PLAN SYNOPSIS ................................................................ 1-1 2.0 PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE LHMP PLANNING PROCESS ................................................................... 2-1 2.2 OPPORTUNITIES FOR STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................. 2-2 2.3 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ......................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 REVIEW AND INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANS AND REPORTS ........................................ 2-4 2.5 INTEGRATING HMP PRECEPTS INTO EXISTING PLANNING MECHANISMS ................................ 2-5 2.6 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................... 2-5 2.7 PLAN UPDATE AND MONITORING METHOD ........................................................................... 2-5 3.0 COMMUNITY PROFILE ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I Would Like to Update You on the Essential Air Service Situation at Alamosa and to Give You an Opportunity to Submit Any Comments If You Wish
    V Office of the Secretary of Transportation The Honorable Ferris Bervig Mayor of Alamosa Post Office Box 4 19 Alamosa, Colorado 8 1 101 Dear Mayor Bervig: I would like to update you on the essential air service situation at Alamosa and to give you an opportunity to submit any comments if you wish. As you know, by Order 2004-1- 10, January 13, 2004, the Department solicited proposals from all interested air carriers to provide service at Alamosa, Cortez, and Pueblo. In response to that order, we received 27 proposal options from Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., and Mesa Air Group, Inc. d/b/a Air Midwest. While we would normally write up a brief summary of all of the proposals, that is not practical in this case given the number of options. Moreover, each carrier applicant was directed to serve its proposal(s) on you; in addition, copies of the proposals may be accessed online through the Department's Dockets Management System at: http://dms.dot.gov/ by doing a simple search on Docket Number 2960. My purpose in writing to you at this time is to request any final comments you might have on the carriers' service and subsidy proposals before we submit a recommendation on the carrier selection issue to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. Please note that the estimated average passenger fare shown in a carrier's proposal does not necessarily reflect the average local fare that passengers would actually pay, but rather reflects that portion of the total ticket price, e.g., the Alamosa-Denver portion of an Alamosa-(Denver)-Washington fare, that would go to the essential air service carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • 30-Mile Studio Zone Map N S U G Viejo E
    David Rd Banducci Rd S d Horse Thief o R d 33 r Rd a e Golf & Country Club 58 14 L iv 5 e ak g R e 99 d ld R v d O Mojave l Rid B r 166 Maricopa Maricopa Hwy Airport y d le t 166 i R 166 e Tehachapi Mountains C e e h in a Rd i m W ek Mojave n y SAN LUIS OBISPO e r Cr a ld o l O f i C l a COUNTY C Pine Cyn Rd 58 North Edwards d R yn 58 d C R d t o e o u S nw o sq o da Boron u tt p o L a e C R k T d e d R n 166 14 o y n a Backus Rd d I C r y R d w d o v d s l R in is d l g Hw R B R A F s R n i r n o a o n r t r h i California o e d il KERN r t l k p R an c r i d e s Aliso Park S i e d Aqueduct m p Cerr a S P R o c w l r en Rd l o Edwards n h T o l 58 e Noro a - c l COUNTY i Hi B L e s r e AFB v i st W e nk i a Foothill Rd K Rd j p l o ey a M h 5 c Rd a h e T Rosamond C erro N Willow Springs Airport oroest e Rd Raceway Barstow Fort Tejon Rosamond Blvd t d S n R i State Historic Park Mil P otrero Hw Rosamond Blvd n Ma Lenwood y Rosamond a S m d i er Frazier e 395 r C R ud a H Fo dy xen Va Park lle w C y F a R razier Mountain P y ny d ark Rd on R 33 d r ve B e Ri a av rs Moj LOS PADRES t ow y NATIONAL FOREST G w R o d d rm s H an R il P a o Lanc E r aster e s Quail Rd T l d t R t al d a S n R n Lake y o yo Avenue D d ti n Avenue D h w n a t C r Na e 0 s 138 l o 138 F s 2 Ali 138 e y Sisquoc 1 H Hungry Valley e 1 l Figueroa Mounta River l in Rd 0 a t State Vehicular General V h 15 d e S William J Fox p 247 VENTURA Recreation Area t y R W e W o l Cuyama t W Airfield all e N2 S V t d Sierra Madre t River n R E h S F t t Mountains ood A Avenue
    [Show full text]
  • Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization GUSTAVUS, ALASKA
    SUBMITTED TO: Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 2301 Peger Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 BY: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 2355 Hill Road Fairbanks, Alaska (907) 479-0600 www.shannonwilson.com WORK PLAN – REVISION 1 Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization GUSTAVUS, ALASKA July 2019 Shannon & Wilson No: 102599-001 Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization Work Plan – Revision 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR DOUBLE-SIDED PRINTING 102599-001 July 2019 Gustavus Airport PFAS Site Characterization Work Plan – Revision 1 Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities 2301 Peger Road Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 Attn: Ms. Samantha Loud RE: WORK PLAN – REVISION 1, GUSTAVUS AIRPORT PFAS SITE CHARACTERIZATION, GUSTAVUS, ALASKA The services we propose in this Work Plan will be conducted on behalf of the Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF). Our scope of services was specified in our proposal dated February 1, 2019 and authorized on February 27, 2019 by DOT&PF under our Professional Services Agreement Number 25-19-1-013 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Related Environmental & Engineering Services. Additional funding to implement this Work Plan will be requested following Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) approval. This Work Plan was prepared and reviewed by: Kristen Freiburger, Associate Senior Chemist Role: Project Manager Christopher Darrah, C.P.G., CPESC Vice President Role: Contract Manager 102599-001 July 2019 7/22/2019-000) Gustavus Work Plan i Gustavus Airport
    [Show full text]
  • Gustavus Airport Stockpile Sampling and Analysis Plan, Gustavus, Alaska
    May 18, 2021 Ms. Sammy Cummings and Mr. Marcus Zimmerman Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Southcoast Region P.O. Box 110218 Juneau, Alaska 99811 RE: GUSTAVUS AIRPORT STOCKPILE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN, GUSTAVUS, ALASKA We understand the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has requested sampling of the stockpile adjacent to the long runway at the Gustavus Airport (GST) via incremental sampling methodology (ISM). The purpose of an ISM sample is to report statistically defensible mean analyte concentrations within a given area or bulk quantity of material, known as a decision unit (DU). To meet the strict criteria of a representative and reproducible ISM sample result, the sample collection process must adhere to Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC) guidance. An ISM sample is a composite of a representative number of subsamples referred to as increments. ISM samples are more robust and representative than a typical composite sample because the entire DU is subdivided into units of equivalent surface area and/or volume. An increment of equivalent mass is collected from each of these subunits, such that every portion of the entire DU is represented equally within the final composite. The location from which the increments are collected within the subunits is determined through some form of random selection to remove procedural bias. Replicate ISM samples are collected at a rate of 20 percent of the overall project ISM samples, or at minimum of one set per area of concern. Replicates are collected to analyze the precision of the method and to calculate 95 percent upper confidence limits (95% UCLs) for the target analytes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.0 Response to Comments
    F I N A L E NVIRONMENTAL I M P A C T R EPORT T H E C OMMONS SCH N O . 2019110341 C I T Y O F C LAREMONT , C ALIFORNIA A U G U S T 2020 2.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The City received twenty-two (22) letters or email comments on the Draft EIR. Of these comments, seven were received from State, regional, or local agencies; two were from community/business organizations; one was from a tribal government; and twelve received from private parties. All comments have been responded to within this document. Comments that address environmental concerns have been specifically addressed. Section 15088 of the State CEQA Guidelines, Evaluation of and Response to Comments, states: a) The lead agency shall evaluate comments on environmental issues received from persons who reviewed the draft EIR and shall prepare a written response. The lead agency shall respond to comments received during the noticed comment period and any extensions and may respond to late comments. b) The written response shall describe the disposition of significant environmental issues raised (e.g., revisions to the proposed project to mitigate anticipated impacts or objections). In particular, major environmental issues raised when the lead agency’s position is at variance with recommendations and objections raised in the comments must be addressed in detail, giving the reasons that specific comments and suggestions were not accepted. There must be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information will not suffice. c) The response to comments may take the form of a revision to the draft EIR or may be a separate section in the final EIR.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Alaska Itb Number 2515H029 Amendment Number One (1)
    STATE OF ALASKA ITB NUMBER 2515H029 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE (1) AMENDMENT ISSUING OFFICE: Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Statewide Contracting & Procurement P.O. Box 112500 (3132 Channel Drive, Room 145) Juneau, Alaska 99811-2500 THIS IS NOT AN ORDER DATE AMENDMENT ISSUED: February 9, 2015 ITB TITLE: De-icing Chemicals ITB OPENING DATE AND TIME: February 27, 2015 @ 2:00 PM Alaska Time The following changes are required: 1. Attachment A, DOT/PF Maintenance Stations identifying the address and contact information and is added to this ITB. This is a mandatory return Amendment. Your bid may be considered non-responsive and rejected if this signed amendment is not received [in addition to your bid] by the bid opening date and time. Becky Gattung Procurement Officer PHONE: (907) 465-8949 FAX: (907) 465-2024 NAME OF COMPANY DATE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations SOUTHEAST REGION F.O.B. POINT Contact Name: Contact Phone: Cell: Juneau: 6860 Glacier Hwy., Juneau, AK 99801 Eric Wilkerson 465-1787 723-7028 Gustavus: Gustavus Airport, Gustavus, AK 99826 Brad Rider 697-2251 321-1514 Haines: 720 Main St., Haines, AK 99827 Matt Boron 766-2340 314-0334 Hoonah: 700 Airport Way, Hoonah, AK 99829 Ken Meserve 945-3426 723-2375 Ketchikan: 5148 N. Tongass Hwy. Ketchikan, AK 99901 Loren Starr 225-2513 617-7400 Klawock: 1/4 Mile Airport Rd., Klawock, AK 99921 Tim Lacour 755-2229 401-0240 Petersburg: 288 Mitkof Hwy., Petersburg, AK 99833 Mike Etcher 772-4624 518-9012 Sitka: 605 Airport Rd., Sitka, AK 99835 Steve Bell 966-2960 752-0033 Skagway: 2.5 Mile Klondike Hwy., Skagway, AK 99840 Missy Tyson 983-2323 612-0201 Wrangell: Airport Rd., Wrangell, AK 99929 William Bloom 874-3107 305-0450 Yakutat: Yakutat Airport, Yakutat, AK 99689 Robert Lekanof 784-3476 784-3717 1 of 6 ITB 2515H029 - De-icing Chemicals ATTACHMENT A DOT/PF Maintenance Stations NORTHERN REGION F.O.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Timetable Validity Period: Sunday, 1St September 2019 to Monday, 30Th September 2019
    Worldwide Timetable Validity Period: Sunday, 1st September 2019 to Monday, 30th September 2019 From Phoenix (PHX) To Phoenix (PHX) From To Frequency Dep Arr Flight a/c Via Arr Dep Flight a/c From To Frequency Dep Arr Flight a/c Via Arr Dep Flight a/c Albany - Albany International Airport (ALB) Albany - Albany International Airport (ALB) - - 12345 - - 6:00a 3:35p UA1600 319 EWR 1:41p 2:29p UA4954* ERJ - - - - - - - 6 - 6:00a 9:26a DL2537 319 DTW 7:43a 8:20a DL2200 321 Operated By Commutair Dba United Express - - - - - - - 6 - 6:20a 3:16p DL1453 321 DTW 1:06p 1:45p DL3993* CR9 - - - - - - - - 7 6:05a 10:00a WN5338 73W BWI 7:25a 8:10a WN2856 73W Operated By Skywest Dba Delta Connection - - - - - - - 6 - 10:00a 7:51p AA0498 738 CLT 5:18p 5:50p AA4565* E75 - - - - - - - 6 - 6:14a 9:53a DL1450 717 MSP 7:57a 8:45a DL1874 321 Operated By Republic Airways as American Eagle - - 1234567 11:30a 9:09p UA1552 EQV EWR 7:00p 7:55p UA4944* ERJ - - 12345 - - 6:30a 10:05a WN0136 73W MDW 7:40a 8:25a WN1093 73H Operated By Commutair Dba United Express - - 12345 - 7 12:11p 10:26p AA0727 321 CLT 7:26p 8:24p AA4565* E75 - - 12345 - 7 7:50a 11:29a AA3207* CR7 ORD 9:12a 9:49a AA0866 738 Operated By Republic Airways as American Eagle Operated By Skywest Airlines as American Eagle - - 1234567 12:23p 9:48p AA0615 738 ORD 6:04p 6:39p AA3205* CR7 - - 1234567 8:20a 12:32p AA4868* ER4 PHL 9:32a 10:30a AA1970 321 Operated By Skywest Airlines as American Eagle Operated By Piedmont Airlines as American Eagle - - - - - - - 6 - 12:44p 9:53p DL1466 321 DTW 7:39p 8:30p DL1603
    [Show full text]