DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Management & Long Range Planning Committee Agenda Letter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WATER MANAGEMENT & LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA LETTER Secretary of the Board of Directors 4699 Hollister Avenue, Department Name: Water Supply & Goleta, CA 93110 Conservation (805) 879-4621 For Agenda Of: February 18, 2016 Estimated Time 15 minutes Continued Item: No If Yes, Date From: TO: Committee Members FROM: Department: Water Supply & Conservation Contact Info: Ryan Drake, Water Supply & Conservation Manager SUBJECT: Update on the Upper Santa Ynez River Operating Agreement (USYROA) and USBR Warren Act Contract Legal Concurrence: As to form: N/A Recommended Action: Receive an update on activities related to the Upper Santa Ynez River Operating Agreement (USYROA) and ongoing negotiations between the City of Santa Barbara and the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), and provide direction to staff as appropriate. Summary Text: Historical Background on USYROA On August 1, 1989, the City of Santa Barbara (City) entered into the USYROA with the Downstream Purveyors1 on the Santa Ynez River, including Goleta Water District. The USBR signed an associated Consent and Acknowledgment document attesting that the USYROA was consistent with agreements related to the Cachuma Project, and would not adversely affect the financial obligations of the Cachuma Member Units with respect to the Cachuma Project. USYROA, which is also known as the “Pass Through Agreement,” was developed as a compromise solution to resolve concerns related to City plan to raise Gibraltar Dam in the mid-1980s for expansion of the diminishing capacity of Gibraltar Reservoir as a result of ongoing siltation. The Cachuma Member Units and downstream water rights holders raised concerns that enlarging Gibraltar would have 1 The Downstream Water Purveyors include Goleta Water District, Carpinteria Valley Water District, Montecito Water District, Summerland County Water District (since consolidated with the Montecito Water District), the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, and the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District Improvement District No. 1. ITEM 6 PAGE 1 WMLRP Committee February 18, 2016 Agenda Page 2 of 4 an adverse impact on downstream users and diminish the natural flow of the Santa Ynez River, along with additional environmental concerns. USYROA enacted a compromise solution that recognizes the Gibraltar water rights of the City while deferring a dam enlargement project. For background purposes, USYROA specifically: • Identifies the City right to divert a maximum of 7,278 acre feet per year (AFY) of Gibraltar Reservoir Water. This is made up of 4,189 AFY from ordinary flow and 3,089 AFY from flood flows. The Agreement considers this the “Base Operation” scenario.2 • Recognizes that without enlarging Gibraltar Dam, the City is unlikely to divert its full entitlement through Mission Tunnel on a regular basis, due to siltation. Therefore, the USYROA establishes two operating modes for the City to use its Gibraltar Reservoir supplies: 1) Mitigation Operations, and 2) Pass-Through Operations. 1) Mitigation Operations enables the City to divert up to 8,000 AFY through Mission Tunnel, but the City is required to mitigate the effects of this diversion on Cachuma by giving up a portion of its Cachuma Project entitlement when diversions exceed 4,550 acre-feet in a given year. The City is currently operating under the Mitigation Operations scenario and has been required to “mitigate” 67 AFY from 1991-2008. Since 2008, mitigating actions have not been necessary as diversions through Mission Tunnel have remained below the 4,550 AFY threshold. 2) Pass-Through Operations allow the City to divert water through Mission Tunnel and pass- through water for storage in Lake Cachuma. The water is held in a Lake Cachuma Pass-Through Account for future City use, in addition to the City Cachuma Project entitlement water. Under this mode of operations, the City is required to forego a portion of its Cachuma Project entitlement when diversions through the Mission Tunnel and water accrued in the Lake Cachuma Pass Through Account exceed Base Operations diversions, or 7,278 AFY. USYROA enables the City to implement Pass-Through Operations when a significant event, such as extreme siltation, reduces the storage capacity of Gibraltar by at least 1,000 acre-feet. Since such extreme siltation has occurred, as discussed below, the City will be implementing Pass-Through Operations. • Establishes a Technical Committee for USYROA administration. The Technical Committee is tasked with resolving USYROA implementation issues and reviewing operational data. The Technical Committee is comprised of the City, USBR, the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District (SYRWCD), and one representative selected jointly by Goleta, Montecito, and Carpinteria Water Districts. Montecito Water District General Manager Tom Mosby currently holds this seat on the Committee. Warren Act Contract Requirement and Current Status of Environmental Review The siltation of Gibraltar following the 2007 Zaca Fire resulted in loss of approximately 1,500 acre feet of capacity in the reservoir, and Gibraltar ended the 2013-14 year at 8 percent of capacity. Accordingly, the City initiated the transition from Mitigation to Pass-Through Operations under the parameters of USYROA and began the process for establishing a Warren Act Contract with USBR. Under federal 2 The “Gin Chow” Judgment, which resulted from litigation that followed the construction of Gibraltar, quantified the City’s water rights by identifying normal flows and spill flows that the City is entitled to use. Gin Chow also requires the City to release water from Gibraltar for downstream riparian users. ITEM 6 PAGE 2 WMLRP Committee February 18, 2016 Agenda Page 3 of 4 law, a Warren Act Contract is required for the conveyance and storage of non-project water in a federal facility. Initiation of a Warren Act Contract is an action that triggers environmental review under both the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As part of the environmental review preparation, the City finalized the Hydrologic Analysis of the Pass Through Operations at Gibraltar Reservoir Report in August 2013. The Report analyzed the hydrologic effects of implementing Pass Through Operations using the Santa Ynez River Riverware Model (SYRRM) and the Santa Ynez River Hydrology Model (SYRHM). The City worked cooperatively with the USBR to prepare the environmental assessment (EA) on the proposed Warren Act Contract needed to store Pass Through water in Lake Cachuma, pursuant to NEPA requirements. USBR previously indicated a draft EA would be available for review by the USYROA Technical Committee in early October 2013; however, USBR and the City hoped to have a draft water rights order for the Cachuma Project released by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) prior to release of the draft EA. While the water rights order from the State Water Board has been delayed until at least April of 2016, USBR decided to release a Draft Finding of No Significant Impact to the Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara’s Gibraltar Reservoir Pass Through Water in and Through Cachuma Project Facilities (FONSI 12-086) on January 12, 2016. The City of Santa Barbara distributed a letter update on the status of the City’s efforts to implement Pass Through Operations on January 13, 2016. In that letter, the City stated that it believed the requirements of CEQA have already been met as to the execution and implementation of the Pass Through Agreement, including Warren Act contract execution, since the City filed a Notice of Exemption in July of 1989, when the agreement was executed. The City also stated its intent to coordinate an “interim arrangement” by which water would be transferred in Lake Cachuma from the various parties to the agreement to the City in the event the necessary Warren Act contract is not yet in place by the time a Pass Through condition occurs. In response, the District sent a letter (Attachment 1) reiterating concerns with the Draft EA, and noting the requirement for the parties to meet and negotiate in good faith before any operational changes are made prior to a Warren Act Contract being in place. After review of the Draft EA and as reported in previous updates to the Committee, there are several outstanding issues of interest to the District that remain unaddressed, including: • Financial arrangements related to storage and delivery of non-federal City water in Lake Cachuma and through the Tecolote Tunnel, South Coast Conduit, and related facilities. • Impacts of the storage and delivery of the non-federal City water on the regional infrastructure capacity and how those impacts are accounted for. • Impacts related to critical drought operations for Lake Cachuma and other cumulative impacts. Many of these concerns have been raised in prior comments before the USYROA Technical Committee, including at the meeting of May 29, 2015, and via a formal comment letter from the District to the City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department dated January 24, 2012 (Attachment 2). The District has made these concerns clear via a comment letter submitted ahead of the February 11, 2016 deadline for comments on the Draft EA (Attachment 3). Critically, the District believes the issue ITEM 6 PAGE 3 WMLRP Committee February 18, 2016 Agenda Page 4 of 4 of cost contribution by the City for use of Cachuma Project infrastructure for transmittal of non-Project water from Gibraltar must be resolved prior to the City finalizing Pass Through Operations. The District will continue to work with the City, USBR, and the other Cachuma Member Units to develop the procedures and policies needed to address these issues prior to implementation of Pass Through operations. Background: Gibraltar Dam and Reservoir, located in the Santa Ynez River watershed upstream from Lake Cachuma, was built by the City in 1920 expanded in 1949. Water supplies from the Reservoir make up approximately one-third of the City water supply portfolio.
Recommended publications
  • 5.1 Hydrology, Water Supply, and Water Quality

    5.1 Hydrology, Water Supply, and Water Quality

    5.1 HYDROLOGY, WATER SUPPLY, AND WATER QUALITY 5.1.1 OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY The proposed Master Plan Update will provide for additional water infrastructure facilities for the City of Solvang (City). The analysis of the proposed Master Plan Update was divided into potential construction and operational impacts to the surface and groundwater hydrology, the water supply, and water quality of the Santa Ynez River. The Master Plan Update proposes that the Santa Ynez River be the primary source of water for the City. The City will be required to obtain and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Therefore, the proposed Master Plan Update impacts to water quality during construction would be less than significant (Class III). The proposed Master Plan Update impacts to surface water hydrology, groundwater hydrology, water rights, and water supplies during construction would be less than significant (Class III). Operation of the proposed wells identified in the Master Plan Update would result in minimal reductions in flows along the Santa Ynez River at the Alisal Bridge compared to baseline conditions. Surface water quantity and quality along the Santa Ynez River would be consistent with historic measurements at the Lompoc Narrows under baseline conditions and under the proposed Master Plan Update. Water right users along the Santa Ynez River downstream of Bradbury Dam to the Highway 101 Bridge in Buellton would receive their entire water right entitlement from the riparian groundwater basins and the Cachuma Project. Therefore, potential cumulative water right impacts would be less than significant (Class III).
  • Historic P U B Lic W Ork S P Roje Cts on the Ce N Tra L

    Historic P U B Lic W Ork S P Roje Cts on the Ce N Tra L

    SHTOIRICHISTORIC SHTOIRIC P U B LIC W ORK S P ROJE TSCP ROJE CTS P ROJE TSC ON THE CE N TRA L OCA STCOA ST OCA ST Compiled by Douglas Pike, P.E. Printing Contributed by: Table of Contents Significant Transportation P rojects......2 El Camino Real................................................... 2 US Route 101...................................................... 3 California State Route 1...................................... 6 The Stone Arch Bridge ..................................... 11 Cold Spring Canyon Arch Bridge..................... 12 Significant W ater P rojects...................14 First Dams and Reservoirs................................ 14 First Water Company........................................ 14 Cold Spring Tunnel........................................... 15 Mission Tunnel ................................................. 16 Gibraltar Dam ................................................... 16 Central Coast Conduit....................................... 18 Water Reclamation In Santa Maria Valley....... 23 Twitchell Dam & Reservoir.............................. 24 Santa Maria Levee ............................................ 26 Nacimiento Water Project................................. 28 M iscellaneous P rojects of Interest.......30 Avila Pier .......................................................... 30 Stearns Wharf.................................................... 32 San Luis Obispo (Port Harford) Lighthouse..... 34 Point Conception Lighthouse............................ 35 Piedras Blancas Light ......................................
  • Summer 2009, Vol. 35, Nos. 3 & 4

    Summer 2009, Vol. 35, Nos. 3 & 4

    ISSN 0734-4988 Ancestors est SANTA BARBARA COUNTY GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY Spring/Summer 2009 Volume 35 sbgen.org Numbers 3 &4 IN THIS ISSUE Presidents Message, Arthur Sylvester .............. ··'!.~:.· ...............................................................................•. 4 7 A Headstone for Aunt Frances by Howard Menzel .................................................................................48 Santa Barbara County WWI Memorial Freewaf:101 Widening Project.. .............................................. 50 WWI Honor Roll of Names .................................................................................................................... 50 News From Los Alamos ................................. ·.. ~.·.'··'-············································ .................................... 51 The English Land-Owning System in History, by Val Porter............................................................... .51 Research Insight-1825 Iowa Census, by Jeff ~chlatter. ...................................................................... 52 Dairies in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties 1850-1965 (G-N) compiled by Jim Norris ... 53 FamilySearch.org-New Collections ..................................................................................................... 65 Genealogy: Tips for Fnding Females that Matter to You, by Julie Miller. .............................................. 66 An Obituary-AnotherTake.................................... .'....................................................................................
  • L L Athletic Group to Hold Aiual Plat Day Here Phelps

    L L Athletic Group to Hold Aiual Plat Day Here Phelps

    v o l . Santa Barbara, California, Wednesday, February 22, 1933 xn No. 21 Fraternity Representatives Lompoc Pupils in Praise o f State Student Officers in Reorganize Rules to Guide “ Boy, what a band! And what a keen college that must Ironing Out Process Rush Activities This Term be. That’s where I want to go.” L “ These are a few of the en­ Open House Scheduled to Acquaint Frosh thusiastic comments of Lom ­ With Tong Members Monday Night, Feb. 27 poc high school students, on of Financial Kinks L T IE the State college band and glee A t the final meeting of the fall term, the Inter-fraternity club,” reports President Clar­ ence L. Phelps, who spoke in Current Money A ffairs on Firm Basis but Clifford Leedy Leads council, composed of two men from each of the social organi­ James McCloskey at the Lompoc high school F ri­ Debits of Other Years Furnish Troubles 55 Local Men zations, completed its revision of rules covering rushing and Work on Plan to day evening, under the aus­ on Trip pledging. Several changes have been made in the method of Assist Book pices of ithe Lompoc P.T.A. procedure, as shown in the following section from the council’s The President’s subject was, AN EDITORIAL by-laws: “Shall We Maintain Our Ideals Evincing a commendable attitude of genuine and unselfish In Appearance Here Rush week this semester will be the fourth week of the Proposes Ad Changes of Publio Education?” concern toward the handling of student affairs, the associated new term.
  • Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara's Gibraltar

    Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara's Gibraltar

    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara’s Gibraltar Reservoir Pass Through Water in and Through Cachuma Project Facilities FONSI-12-086 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation January 2016 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California Draft FONSI-12-086 Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara’s Gibraltar Reservoir Pass Through Water in and Through Cachuma Project Facilities _____________ Prepared by: Stacy L. Holt Date Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Ned M. Gruenhagen Date Wildlife Biologist or Biology Technician _____________ Concurred by: Rain L. Emerson Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Approved by: Michael P. Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager Draft FONSI-12-086 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), has determined that executing 5- and 40- year Warren Act contracts with the City of Santa Barbara (City) is not a major federal action that will significantly affect the quality of the human environment and an environmental impact statement is not required.
  • Historic Resources Survey and Planning Analysis

    Historic Resources Survey and Planning Analysis

    Historic Resources Survey And Planning Analysis City of Lompoc, California Prepared by Historic Resources Group for the City of Lompoc July 2005 Historic Resources Survey And Planning Analysis City of Lompoc, California Prepared for City of Lompoc 100 Civic Center Plaza Lompoc, California 93438 Prepared by Historic Resources Group 1728 Whitley Avenue Hollywood, California 90028 July 2005 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................1 I. BACKGROUND .................................................................................3 CITY OF LOMPOC.................................................................................. 3 PREVIOUS SURVEYS AND EVALUATIONS ............................................................ 4 National Register of Historic Places ................................................... 5 California Register of Historical Resources........................................... 7 City Landmarks............................................................................. 8 Cultural Resources ........................................................................ 8 Other Studies............................................................................. 10 II. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................ 11 OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 11 SURVEY PROCESS................................................................................ 11 “THE MILE
  • In Search of Bigfoot: the Ommonc Law Origins of Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution Brian E

    In Search of Bigfoot: the Ommonc Law Origins of Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution Brian E

    Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 17 Article 10 Number 1 Fall 1989 1-1-1989 In Search of Bigfoot: The ommonC Law Origins of Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution Brian E. Gray Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian E. Gray, In Search of Bigfoot: The Common Law Origins of Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution, 17 Hastings Const. L.Q. 225 (1989). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol17/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "In Search of Bigfoot": The Common Law Origins of Article X, Section 2 of the California Constitution By BRIAN E. GRAY* I. Introduction In a constitution laden with obscure and sometimes trivial provi- sions, Article X, section 2 is surely among the least known and least appreciated. Enacted by initiative in 1928, this section directs that all uses of California's water resources must be reasonable and for beneficial purposes.' The policy of Article X, section 2 is set forth in its first sen- tence, which provides: [B]ecause of the conditions prevailing in this State the general wel- fare requires that the water resources of the State be put to benefi- cial use to the fullest extent of which they are capable, and that the waste or unreasonable use or unreasonable method of use of water be prevented, and that the conservation of such waters is to be ex- ercised with a view to the reasonable and beneficial use thereof in the interest of the people and for the public welfare.' The second sentence of the amendment implements this policy, declaring that [t]he right to water..
  • SILTING of RESE] ^Fieak ^ Novi of 0193Í

    SILTING of RESE] ^Fieak ^ Novi of 0193Í

    Issued JULY 1936 TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 524 Revised August 1939 SILTING OF RESE] ^fiEAk ^ NOVi OF 0193Í By HENRY M. EAKIN Head, Sedimentation Studies Division of Research Soil Ck>nseryation Service Revised by CARL B. BROWN Project Supervisor Reservoir Investigations Soil Ck>n8ervation Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON, D. C. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DéCi -• -------••-•-- Price ?1.00 JULY 1936 TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 524 REVISED AUGUST 1939 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON, D. C. SILTING OF RESERVOIRS ' By HENEY M. EAKIN^ Head, Sedimentation Studies, Division of Research, Soil Conservation Service Revised by CABL B. BROWN Project Supervisor, Reservoir Investigations CONTENTS Page Page Introduction 2 Reservoir surveys—Continued. The project.- _ — 2 Upper Crystal Springs Reservoir 114 Economic aspects of the problem . 3 Upper San Leandro Reservón: 116 Physical aspects of the problem 4 Original capacity survey of Lake Mead... 117 Processes of reeervoir silting 6 General summary of results of the 1934-38 Previous investigations— 8 surveys 119 Basin reservoirs -.- 9 Reservoir reconnaissance investigations, 1934- Basin reservoirs resurveyed in 1935-36- 37 126 White Rock Reservoir Sediment measurements in other south- Elephant Butte Reservoir eastern reservoirs 126 Roosevelt Reservoir Emporia Reservoir, Emporia, Va 125 Lake Michie__ Wateree Reservoir, near Cam den, S. C. 127 Gibraltar Reservoir ._ Lake Murray, Saluda River, above Basin reservoirs with earlier records Columbia, S. C 128 only Appalachie Reservoir, Greer, S. C 128 Lake Worth Stevens Creek Reservoir, Augusta, Ga_ 130 Lake McMillan Warwick Reservoir, near Cordele, Ga_ 131 Zuni Reservoir Flint River and Muckafoone Reser- Sweet water Reservoir _ voirs, Albany, Ga 135 Lake Chabot Lake Martin, Dadeville, Ala 136 Guernsey Reservoir Completely filled Piedmont reservoirs 139 Cheoah Reservoir._.
  • DWP Motion Final

    DWP Motion Final

    Councilmember Herb Wesson, Chair Rules, Elections & Intergovernmental Relations Committee Los Angeles City Council 200 North Spring Street, Room 340 Los Angeles, California 90012 CC: Mayor Eric Garcetti Los Angeles City Council City Controller Ron Galperin Dear Committee Members: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Councilmember Fuentes’ motion to restructure LADWP’s governance. Green LA is a coalition of advocacy organizations based in the City of Los Angeles. We have worked with LADWP for over a decade on the advancement of safe, reliable, and affordable water and power service. While we agree that the current structure could benefit from some reform, we urge you to oppose the specific efforts to remove or limit city council and mayoral oversight. The proposed motion as currently drafted would put unelected officials in charge of policy decisions undermining our democratic process. Policy decisions such as efficiency, resiliency, and equity require a fresh look by leaders that represent voters. For instance, Mayor Garcetti set LA on a path to transform our city’s water portfolio into a resilient one that can withstand long-term droughts and climate change. And, in the prior administration, Mayor Villaraigosa and the Council embraced these policies as they moved LADWP away from coal in 2013. Without democratic representation, we are not able to secure our institutions evolve or hold elected officials accountable when they do not respond to voter interests. The proposed motion would remove the oversight that ensures necessary checks and balances. Decision-making without proper oversight too often results in unaccounted for and wasted resources. For instance, the still unaccounted for $40 million spent on training and safety left a veil of distrust over DWP management.
  • Gibraltar Dam Background

    Gibraltar Dam Background

    6-c CITY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Draft AGENDA DATE: April 10, 2018 TO: Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Engineering Division, Public Works Department SUBJECT: Contract For the Gibraltar Spillway Condition Assessment RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute a City Professional Services contract with GEI Consultants, Inc. in the amount of $86,281 for professional services to prepare the Gibraltar Spillway Condition Assessment Report, and authorize the Public Works Director to approve additional expenditures of up to $8,628 for extra services of GEI Consultants Inc. that may result from necessary changes in the scope of work. DISCUSSION: Background The City owns and operates Gibraltar Dam (Dam), which was constructed in 1920 and is located on the Santa Ynez River, upstream of Lake Cachuma, and approximately nine miles from the City of Santa Barbara. The Dam has a maximum height of 178 feet, a 600-foot long crest, and is equipped with five spillways having a combined total capacity to pass water at a rate of 90,000 cubic feet per second. In last year’s rainy season in Northern California, Oroville Lake filled and spilled, resulting in extensive damage to the spillway. This created a crisis situation, complete with the need for mass evacuations downstream, below the dam. As a result of this experience, the California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) established a mandate for dam owners to assess the condition of the spillways at every facility under its jurisdiction. The deadline for the Gibraltar facility is July 31, 2019. The proposed contract will satisfy that mandate and will provide the City with an update on the condition of the Dam.
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 36133 Major D

    EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 36133 Major D

    October 31, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 36133 Major D. Bursey, Jr. James C. Heinen Michael J. Gill Karl A. Klankowski John W. Mickelson Jeffrey A. Schmitz Elizabet h M. Claw Robert L. Howard Gary L. Girardet Robert L. Knight Gary G. Miller Dennis J. Seipel Mark E. Dowd Roger A. Hungerford James T. Glass Robert E. Kunkle James E. Miller Mark L. Shaw The following-named Navy enlisted scien­ Edward L. Graham Paul E. Lambourne Micheal G . Miller Robert R. Silvira tific education program candidates to be per­ Charles W. Green Michael H. Laptaz William E. Mize Harvey E. Sitzlar manent ensigns in the line or staff corps of Johnny L. Green Robert C. Larrabee Michael A. Moan Paul Slominski the Navy, subject t o the qualifications there­ Arthur W. Gresham Daniel L. Lehr Roger J. Morais Ronald E. Small for as provided by law : Ronald N. Gunn Peter J. Lestrange Kenneth M. Muske Alfred Smith James R. Hague James M. Loerch John A. Nixon Forrest J. Smith Thomas D. Dennis C. Claes John F. Hall Stephen R . Lowe Lawrence P. Norstedt William S. Stuhr Abrahamson Earl R. Coffin Norman E. Hardee John F . Luksik Charles E. Ogier Gary E. Tobias Scott J . Amos Donald E. Cole Ricky A. Heiderken John W. Lut z Leo D. Owens Raymond F. Toll Jacob A. Anthony Clenton Collier Robert W. Henderson Pat G . McCartney Scott E. Palmer Taylor T. Tripp Edwin D. Bankston Billy A. Colvin William J. William J. Bennie E. Patton Dave J . Urich Harrison A. Beasley, Kenneth W . Coomes Hendrickson McCullum Stephen S .
  • Notice and Agenda of Special Meeting

    Notice and Agenda of Special Meeting

    NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Special Meeting of the BOARD OF DIRECTORS SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT will be held at 6:30 pm, Wednesday, September 8, 2021 TELECONFERENCE MEETING ONLY – NO PHYSICAL MEETING LOCATION All participants can view presentation materials and live video on their device. New meeting and public participation platform: ZOOM You do NOT need to create a ZOOM account or login with email for meeting participation. ZOOM.us (or Zoom app) “Join a Meeting” Meeting ID: 205 801 1773 Meeting Passcode: 090821 Public participant webcams will be disabled and phones/microphones will be muted until public comment times made available during meeting. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION DIAL-IN NUMBER: 1-669-900-9128 PHONE MEETING ID: 205 801 1773 # Meeting Passcode: 090821 If your device does not have a microphone or speakers, you can call in for audio with the phone number and Meeting ID listed above to listen and participate while viewing the live presentation online. Teleconference Meeting During Coronavirus (COVID-19) Emergency: As a result of the COVID-19 emergency and Governor Newsom’s Executive Orders to protect public health by issuing shelter-in-home standards, limiting public gatherings, and requiring social distancing, this meeting will occur solely via teleconference as authorized by and in furtherance of Executive Order Nos. N-29-20 and N-33-20. Virtual meeting is in accordance with the latest Santa Barbara County Health Office Order. Important Notice Regarding Public Participation in Teleconference Meeting: Those who wish to provide public comment on an Agenda Item, or who otherwise are making a presentation to the Board of Directors, may participate in the meeting using the dial-in number and passcode above.