DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B Documented Historic Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix B DOCUMENTED HISTORIC COMMUNITIES This appendix includes summary descriptions and maps within more than one of the county’s planning areas. For of 57 historic communities throughout Prince George’s example, Riverdale Park (68-004) and West Riverdale County. Thirty-two of these community descriptions (68-093) are counted individually even though they were included in the 1992 Historic Sites and Districts Plan. are within the same municipality, but the Clagett An additional 25 communities, subsequently identified, Agricultural Area (78-000, 79-000 & 82-000) is counted are included here. Two additional communities, although as a single community even though it includes properties surveyed as part of the same effort, are not included here. in three planning areas. All 57 communities have been As locally designated historic districts, the Broad Creek the subject of “windshield”surveys. The purpose of Historic District and the Old Town College Park Historic such surveys is to identify the general characteristics District are the subject of a separate chapter in the plan. of each area including topography, street patterns, The county’s seven National Register Historic Districts, historic architecture, the types of buildings and uses, Mount Rainier, North Brentwood, Hyattsville, Riverdale and the boundaries of the surveyed area. The complete Park, West Riverdale, University Park, and Calvert Hills, windshield survey forms, which include additional and the Greenbelt National Historic Landmark District analysis, maps and representative photographs are are included in the detailed descriptions below and are available for review at M-NCPPC/Prince George’s indicated with the symbol NRHD or NHL. County Planning Department’s Historic Preservation Section or on the M-NCPPC/Prince George’s County The number of these communities in this appendix, Planning Department website, www.pgplanning.org/ 57, reflects the assignment of an individual Maryland About-Planning/Our_Divisions/Countywide_Planning/ Inventory of Historic Properties number for a Historic_Preservation.htm. distinguishable community, but not the double- counting of that community if it happens to be located Appendix B•Documented Historic Communities . R D Rossville (62-023) S TANM ORE D R . D O O W Legend G N O Rossville Survey L Historic Resource Historic Site OLD M U IR K IR K R OAD R D . IVE R D 0 180 360 720 1,080 Feet 242 Preliminary Historic Sites and Districts Plan Appendix B•Documented Historic Communities Rossville (62-023) largest lot on Old Muirkirk Road was purchased by the Rebecca Lodge #6 of the Benevolent Sons and Daughters Rossville is significant as an example of a small, late of Abraham, a fraternal organization whose purpose was nineteenth-century African-American rural settlement. to support its members in times of illness or emergency. Rossville was named for Augustus Ross, one of the On this lot they constructed a lodge now known as first landowners along Old Muirkirk Road. Rossville Abraham Hall (Historic Site/NR 62-023-07). Over the was formed by a group of freed African-Americans years, Abraham Hall has been used as a meeting place, who in 1868 established Queen’s Chapel, a Methodist church, and schoolhouse. congregation near Beltsville. Land for the church was purchased for five dollars from the Minnix family. The site The rural setting of Rossville remains largely intact, but was originally used as a burial ground for local African- subdivisions on the north and west of Rossville have Americans and a church was later built on the site. The begun to encroach on the landscape. The Muirkirk West chapel, a log structure, was also used as a schoolhouse Neighborhood Park, owned by M-NCPPC, is located for neighboring children. In 1886 individual members south of Old Muirkirk Road; it protects the viewshed of the congregation and other African-Americans of the neighborhood and provides a natural boundary. purchased 12 lots along the north side of Old Muirkirk Only a few late nineteenth-century buildings are extant; Road. By 1889 structures were erected on 11 of the lots. most have been replaced with twentieth-century In the late 1890s, Queen’s Chapel was destroyed by fire, construction. Most of the construction dates from the and a wood-frame building replaced the log structure. 1930s and 1940s. Architectural styles in Rossville reflect The congregation outgrew the second building and a range of popular styles from the 1890s to the 2000s constructed a larger brick church that was completed and include Colonial Revival, Craftsman, Dutch Colonial in 1956. For more than 100 years, Queen’s Chapel has Revival, and vernacular interpretations. Building forms served as a central gathering point for this small African- include I-houses, bungalows, Cape Cods, and ranch American community. houses. Many of the structures have been altered by rear and side additions. There are a variety of outbuildings in Residents of Rossville supported themselves by working Rossville, including garages, sheds, and trailers. at the nearby Muirkirk Iron Furnace and by farming. The Preliminary Historic Sites and Districts Plan 243 Appendix B•DocumentedE Historic Communities L L VI N SPR O O I T T A I N AU H H ST T G PL. T BLACKFOOT 9 8 H 4 ARD 4 T BOULEV 9 B 4 . Lakeland LA KFO PL C OT APACHE . T VE. L A H PL R . T D BE . T M . S ET 8 ST. Z 1 4 H L (66-000) ER P O 5 ST TT T 1 R EEN BR 0 D. ANCHVILLE RD. 5 R 5 G BRANCHVILLE RD. VE. VE. A GREENBELT RD. A TEC UMSE H ST. D AN R H U . A H T H SL AN T I T T 8 PL 8 9 4 4 4 SEM ST. I NOL VE. BERWYN E A Legend ST . VE. A R OAN H OKE T H ST 5 T INOLE Lakeland Survey QU . 5 6 SEM EBEC ST. 5 RD. QUEBE Historic Resource C BER AN AT PO ST. WYN U NTIAC TIAC R N 4 Historic Site PO 9 ST. T VE R EW H A D CAMPU . S VI A O . VE ST VE. SA A N T G AV ERR. E E AH D O T SAG ST O O E ST . E XEN H . U C T ST R A DE ME PA M TROIT AVE. LB . O O T R 5 U P R I 7 N VER L. E VE. PO T A . ST VE. H A H A T SI VE. 8 C D 4 OE INC LAKEL AH VE. INA E AN V A TI D NA VE. A AVE. ORE R SYCAM D. PA ST H IN AVE. 1 T 5 5 T PI 4 ER C 5 8 BAL E T H TI AVE. E M N O EV A BR AD R R A VE. E O AN M I ST T . C H H BAL T EN VE 4 D A N 5 LI . PL RTMOU P DA TH K W Y. AVE. VE. VE A VE. A VE A A N C OR OL VE WIC L A H EGE RD. KN S OX N N N A O VE. D PKI ET SO O R AN C D. VE. H N A A I SL I C R KER O D. BI LL C EG PR I M E D U L R VE EH D L I AVE. A GH CALVERT O VE C KN A VE. H OX A R T D D. 0 R GUIL VE. D FORD R 5 . A A AVE. V R A N R H I D. ROAD O FORDHAM VE. D D RD RD. A . W ST N CA 1 2 LVER . 5 5 BO T R DR EXEL D D RD. L T O E S K E CLEMSO A N R R H D W O T E . F U RD. U O 0 400 800 1,600 2,400 M T BEECHW VEN O A FeetOD RD. R A D 244 Preliminary Historic Sites and Districts Plan Appendix B•Documented Historic Communities Lakeland (66-000) Park, Lakeland, Hollywood, Daniels Park, Oak Springs, and Sunnyside were incorporated as part of the City Lakeland was developed as a late nineteenth-century of College Park in 1945. Lakeland remained a small resort community in northwest Prince George’s County. community in the 1950s and 1960s and saw little new The small neighborhood is located in the City of College development. Due to repeated flooding, in 1969 an Park directly east of the University of Maryland, College urban renewal project was begun. The plan included Park campus, north of Old Town College Park, and south building earthenwork dikes along Indian Creek, Paint of Berwyn. Lakeland is bounded by Baltimore Avenue Branch Creek, and Lake Artemesia to prohibit future (US 1) on the west and the CSX railroad tracks (formerly flooding and demolishing existing houses that were in the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad tracks) on the east. the floodplain. The issue divided the small community. Edwin A. Newman, a real estate developer based in Many feared the redevelopment would result in the Washington D.C., platted the community in 1890. displacement of families who had lived in Lakeland for Newman designed the community as an exclusive resort years. Over a 15-year period, the $5.7 million dollar area conveniently located near Lake Artemesia and project resulted in the demolition of 87 houses and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. Newman called the resulted in the construction of 40 units of low-income community Lakeland, “on account of the beautiful lake housing, 86 townhouses, 7 single-family houses, and 2 which is to form a delightful feature of its landscape.
Recommended publications
  • Sequoia & Kings Canyon-Volume 1

    Sequoia & Kings Canyon-Volume 1

    Draft National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior General Management Plan and Sequoia and Kings Canyon Comprehensive River Management Plan / National Parks Middle and South Forks of the Environmental Impact Statement Kings River and North Fork of the Kern River Tulare and Fresno Counties California Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index Page intentionally left blank SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS and MIDDLE AND SOUTH FORKS OF THE KINGS RIVER AND NORTH FORK OF THE KERN RIVER Tulare and Fresno Counties • California DRAFT GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index This document presents five alternatives that are being considered for the management and use of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks over the next 15–20 years. The purpose of the Draft General Management Plan is to establish a vision for what Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks should be, including desired future conditions for natural and cultural resources, as well as for visitor experiences. The no-action alternative would continue current management direction, and it is the baseline for comparing the other alternatives (it was originally alternative B when the alternatives were first presented to the public in the winter of 2000). The preferred alternative is the National Park Service’s proposed action, and it would accommodate sustainable growth and visitor enjoyment, protect ecosystem diversity, and preserve basic character while adapting to changing user groups. Alternative A would emphasize natural ecosystems and biodiversity, with reduced use and development; alternative C would preserve the parks’ traditional character and retain the feel of yesteryear, with guided growth; and alternative D would preserve the basic character and adapt to changing user groups.
  • Private Land Records Finding

    Private Land Records Finding

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior FINDING AID PRIVATE LAND RECORDS 1903-1953 (bulk dates: 1914-1941) Prepared by Beth McDonald National Park Service Catalog Number: SEKI 22572 SEKI 22572 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Copyright and Restrictions …………………………………………………………..…ii History ………………………………………………………………………………….1 Scope and Content ……………………………………………………………………...2 File Unit Descriptions …………………………………………………………………..4 SEKI 22572 ii COPYRIGHT AND RESTRICTIONS The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. The various state privacy acts govern the use of materials that document private individuals, groups, and corporations. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a reproduction if the document does not infringe the privacy rights of an individual, group, or corporation. These specified conditions of authorized use include: • non-commercial and non-profit study, scholarship, or research, or teaching • criticism, commentary, or news reporting • as a NPS preservation or security copy • as a research copy for deposit in another institution If a user later uses a copy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," the user may be personally liable for copyright, privacy, or publicity infringement. This institution's permission to obtain a photographic, xerographic, digital, or other copy of a document doesn't indicate permission to publish, exhibit, perform, reproduce, sell,
  • Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks a Tool for Planning Stock-Supported Wilderness Trips

    Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks a Tool for Planning Stock-Supported Wilderness Trips

    Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Parks Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks A tool for planning stock-supported wilderness trips SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS Wilderness Office 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, California 93271 559-565-3766 [email protected] www.nps.gov/seki/planyourvisit/wilderness.htm Revised May 6th, 2021 EAST CREEK .............................................................................. 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPHINX CREEK .......................................................................... 19 INTRO TO GUIDE ........................................................................ 2 ROARING RIVER ....................................................................... 19 LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE............................................................. 3 CLOUD CANYON ....................................................................... 20 STOCK USE & GRAZING RESTRICTIONS: DEADMAN CANYON ................................................................ 20 KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARK .................................... 4 SUGARLOAF AND FERGUSON CREEKS ................................. 21 SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARK ................................................ 6 CLOVER AND SILLIMAN CREEKS .......................................... 23 MINIMUM IMPACT STOCK USE ................................................ 8 LONE PINE CREEK .................................................................... 23 MINIMUM
  • Giant Sequoia Management in National Parks 1

    Giant Sequoia Management in National Parks 1

    in: Aune, rnuip s., teen, coora. iyy*. rroceeainss oi me symposium on uian. sc^uiaa. '«'" ^.o^c ... the ecotystea and society; 1992 June 23-25; Visalia, CA. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: 109-115. Objects or Ecosystems? PUB #267 Giant Sequoia Management in National Parks 1 David J. Parsons2 Abstract: Policies and programs aimed at protecting giant sequoia the effects of such external threats as air pollution and (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in the national parks of the Sierra Nevada projected human induced climadc change. The challenges have evolved from the protection of individual trees to the preservation of entire ecosystems. We now recognize that the long-term preservation of associated with assuring the long-term preservation of giant giant sequoia depends on our ability to minimize and mitigate the influences sequoia have become increasingly complicated as we have of human activities. National Park Service management strategies for giant learned more about the complexity and inter-relatedness of sequoia focus on the restoration of native ecosytem processes. This includes the greater Sierra Nevada ecosystem. the use of prescribed fire to simulate natural ignitions as well as the movement of visitor facilities out of the groves. Basic research is being This paper briefly reviews the history of giant sequoia carried out to improve our understanding of the factors infuencing giant management in the National Parks of the Sierra Nevada, sequoia reproduction, growth, and survival. Future management decisions emphasizing a gradually improved understanding of giant must recognize that giant sequoia are only part of a complex ecosystem; they sequoia ecosystems and how management has attempted to cannot be managed as objects in isolation of their surroundings.
  • Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment And

    Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment And

    Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment and Biological Evaluation for Sequoia National Forest Hume Lake Ranger District Improvement and Expansion Projects within Giant Sequoia National Monument Tulare County, California December 5, 2019 Prepared for: United States Forest Service Sequoia National Forest Hume Lake District District Ranger: Jeremy Dorsey 35860 East Kings Canyon Road Dunlap, CA 93621 Prepared by: Michelle McKenzie and Prairie Moore Natural Resources Management Corporation 1434 Third Street Eureka, CA 95501 Table of Contents I. Summary of Findings and Conclusions ........................................................................................ 1 II. Introduction, Background, and Project Understanding .............................................................. 2 Project Locations ......................................................................................................................... 3 Project Descriptions .................................................................................................................. 10 Biological Descriptions .............................................................................................................. 16 III. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 17 Pre-Field Review ........................................................................................................................ 17 Field Survey ..............................................................................................................................
  • Suburbanization Historic Context and Survey Methodology

    Suburbanization Historic Context and Survey Methodology

    INTRODUCTION The geographical area for this project is Maryland’s 42-mile section of the I-95/I- 495 Capital Beltway. The historic context was developed for applicability in the broad area encompassed within the Beltway. The survey of historic resources was applied to a more limited corridor along I-495, where resources abutting the Beltway ranged from neighborhoods of simple Cape Cods to large-scale Colonial Revival neighborhoods. The process of preparing this Suburbanization Context consisted of: • conducting an initial reconnaissance survey to establish the extant resources in the project area; • developing a history of suburbanization, including a study of community design in the suburbs and building patterns within them; • defining and delineating anticipated suburban property types; • developing a framework for evaluating their significance; • proposing a survey methodology tailored to these property types; • and conducting a survey and National Register evaluation of resources within the limited corridor along I-495. The historic context was planned and executed according to the following goals: • to briefly cover the trends which influenced suburbanization throughout the United States and to illustrate examples which highlight the trends; • to present more detail in statewide trends, which focused on Baltimore as the primary area of earliest and typical suburban growth within the state; • and, to focus at a more detailed level on the local suburbanization development trends in the Washington, D.C. suburbs, particularly the Maryland counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s. Although related to transportation routes such as railroad lines, trolley lines, and highways and freeways, the location and layout of Washington’s suburbs were influenced by the special nature of the Capital city and its dependence on a growing bureaucracy and not the typical urban industrial base.
  • 66-037-41 Forbes House 4811 Harvard Road College Park, Prince George’S County, Maryland C

    66-037-41 Forbes House 4811 Harvard Road College Park, Prince George’S County, Maryland C

    CAPSULE SUMMARY PG: 66-037-41 Forbes House 4811 Harvard Road College Park, Prince George’s County, Maryland c. 1949 Private The Lustron at 4811 Harvard Road, College Park, Maryland, is significant for its architectural and engineering contributions. Closely associated with federally subsidized efforts to alleviate the post World War II housing shortage, the Lustron is integral to the history of housing in the United States. Although not widely implemented, Lustrons contribute to the post war development of the residential landscape funded primarily through government programs. As such, they are part of a long history of federally subsidized housing efforts, although characterized by innovations that seem remarkably daring in the context of federal housing programs—particularly given the strength of the forestry and conventional homebuilding industry. Further, the Lustron is significant for its contributions to prefabricated metal housing technology of the era as the manufacturing techniques utilized assembly line production directly influenced by the automobile industry. Porcelain-enameled steel panels were an innovative advancement for prefabricated housing construction, particularly as utilized in the single-floor modern ranch house plan that provides the Lustron with their unusual appearance. Their failure to capture a viable market is attributable perhaps to a nation that was truly ill-prepared to embrace modernity within the dearly-held institution of the house. The Forbes House retains sufficient integrity to convey its significance as a Lustron house constructed in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. in the post World War II era. Constructed circa 1949, this one-story dwelling is the two-bedroom, Deluxe Westchester model produced by the Lustron Company in Columbus, Ohio.
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NFS Form 10-900 (Rev. 11-90) /. OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service 4? NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to compete all items. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________ Historic name: CALVERT HILLS HISTORIC DISTRICT Other names/site number: (PG-66-37) 2. Location Street & Number: Roughly bounded by Calvert Road, Bowdoin Avenue, Erskine Road, Calvert Park, Albion Road, and Baltimore Avenue [ 1 Not for Publication City or town: College Park F 1 Vicinity State: Maryland Code: MD County: Prince George's Code: 033 Zip Code: 20740 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [X] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria.
  • John Muir: Illustrated

    John Muir: Illustrated

    MGZGMILCRALX \\ Book < The Story of My Boyhood and Youth (1913). by: John Muir: Illustrated... Th e Story of My Boyh ood and Y outh (1913). by: Joh n Muir: Illustrated (Original Classics) (Paperback) Filesize: 5.32 MB Reviews An exceptional pdf as well as the typeface utilized was interesting to see. I am quite late in start reading this one, but better then never. I am very happy to explain how this is actually the best pdf i actually have go through within my individual daily life and might be he greatest publication for possibly. (Freddie Zulauf) DISCLAIMER | DMCA 7E3OOBCNE6CG \\ Doc # The Story of My Boyhood and Youth (1913). by: John Muir: Illustrated... THE STORY OF MY BOYHOOD AND YOUTH (1913). BY: JOHN MUIR: ILLUSTRATED (ORIGINAL CLASSICS) (PAPERBACK) To read The Story of My Boyhood and Youth (1913). by: John Muir: Illustrated (Original Classics) (Paperback) PDF, remember to access the web link under and save the file or have accessibility to additional information which are related to THE STORY OF MY BOYHOOD AND YOUTH (1913). BY: JOHN MUIR: ILLUSTRATED (ORIGINAL CLASSICS) (PAPERBACK) ebook. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2018. Paperback. Condition: New. Language: English . Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. John Muir ( April 21, 1838 - December 24, 1914) also known as John of the Mountains, was a Scottish-American naturalist, author, environmental philosopher, glaciologist and early advocate for the preservation of wilderness in the United States. His letters, essays, and books describing his adventures in nature, especially in the Sierra Nevada, have been read by millions. His activism has helped to preserve the Yosemite Valley, Sequoia National Park and many other wilderness areas.
  • The Natural Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron Giganteum) Groves of the Sierra Nevada, California-An Updated Annotated List

    The Natural Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron Giganteum) Groves of the Sierra Nevada, California-An Updated Annotated List

    The Natural Giant Sequoia (Sequoiadendron Giganteum) Groves of the Sierra Nevada, California-An Updated Annotated List Dwight Willard1 Abstract: Giant sequoias naturally occur in the Sierra Nevada, California, names.) In contrast, many groves became known by single, in 65 groves, described in an annotated list. The grove list significantly accepted names by the early 20th century. Sequoia National differs from prior published giant sequoia grove lists, primarily as a result of more consistent application of objective criteria of geographic isolation Park groves were comprehensively and systematically listed and minimum giant sequoia group size in grove identification. The grove by the 1930's. However, comprehensive grove lists for the list also reflects significant gains in knowledge of giant sequoia natural entire Sierra Nevada were unsystematic prior to 1969. distributions during recent years. The first comprehensive and more systematic grove list for the entire Sierra Nevada was in Rundel (1969, 1972). Giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum) naturally Rundel's list was more closely based on geographic distinction occurs in the Sierra Nevada, California, primarily in isolated than any prior list, and it reflected his scientific study of concentrations traditionally known as groves. Sequoia actual sequoia distribution. Rundel's list is the basis for the locations are most easily described by reference to named familiar post-1972 descriptions that giant sequoias occur groves, though a relatively few giant sequoias occur apart in "75 groves." His grove list used historical tradition as from recognized groves, in the same localities. the basis for some grove identifications, and he did not Significant additional giant sequoia location research consistently apply an identification criterion of minimum since the early 1970's makes the following updated annotated sequoia group size.
  • Old Town College Park Historic District

    Old Town College Park Historic District

    Old Town College Park Historic District Prepared for the City of College Park by EHT Traceries, Inc. October 2001 REVISED August 2009 The Old Town College Park Historic District Design Guidelines Handbook should be considered a draft until the Old Town College Park Historic District is designated as a historic district by the State of Maryland. This publication is sponsored by the City of College Park and Prince George’s County. Special thanks to the residents and business owners of College Park for their tireless efforts and participation in the design guidelines process. Project Consultants: EHT Traceries, Inc. 1121 5th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 393-1199 [email protected] Preface Part I: Introduction ..........................................................1 History & Development .................................................2 Boundary Description & Justifi cation ...........................6 Local Historic District Designation ..............................8 Contributing & Non-Contributing Resources ...........10 T Purpose of Design Guidelines ....................................12 Design Review/ Historic Area Work Permits ...........14 ABLE Criteria for HAWP .........................................................18 When is an HAWP Required ........................................20 Secretary of Interior’s Standards .................................22 Part II: Design Guidelines .............................................24 Setback .............................................................................26 Spacing
  • Sequoia and General Grant National Parks

    Sequoia and General Grant National Parks

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK. SECRETARY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STEPHEN T. MATHER. DIRECTOR RULES AND REGULATIONS SEQUOIA AND GENERAL GRANT NATIONAL PARKS Photograph by Lindley Eddy. IN THE GIANT FOREST. 1923 Season from May 24 to October 1 0 GIANT FOREST, SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARK, MAY BE REACHED ALL THE YEAR ROUND BY THE MIDDLE FORK ROAD AND TRAIL CAMPERS IN THE GIANT FOREST. Attractive camps in the shadow of these noble trees are dotted throughout the forest during tiie season. TOURISTS ARRIVING AND DEPARTING AT GIANT FOREST RANGER STATION. Here the incoming camper is assigned a camp site by the ranger in charge. THE NATIONAL PARKS AT A GLANCE. [Number, 19; total area, 11,372 square miles.] Area in National parks in Location. square Distinctive characteristics. order of creation. miles. Hot Springs. .. 11 46 hot springs possessing curative properties- 1832 Many hotels and boarding houses—20 bath­ houses under public control. Yellowstone Northwestern Wyo­ 3,348 More geysers than in all rest of world together— 1S72 ming. Boiling springs—Mud volcanoes—Petrified for­ ests—Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone, re­ markable for gorgeous coloring—Large lakes- Many large streams and waterfalls—Vast wil­ derness, greatest wild bird and animal preserve in world—Exceptional trout fishing. Middle eastern Cali­ 252 The Big Tree National Park—Several hundred 1890 fornia. sequoia trees over 10 feet in diameter, some 25 to 36 feet in diameter—Towering mountain ranges—Startling precipices—Mile-long cave of delicate beauty. General Grant Middle eastern Cali­ 4 Created to preserve the celebrated General Grant 1890 fornia. Tree, 35 feet in diameter—31 miles by trail from Sequoia National Park; 85 miles bvauto- moblle.