DOCSLIB.ORG

Sequoia & Kings Canyon-Volume 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sequoia & Kings Canyon-Volume 1 Draft National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior General Management Plan and Sequoia and Kings Canyon Comprehensive River Management Plan / National Parks Middle and South Forks of the Environmental Impact Statement Kings River and North Fork of the Kern River Tulare and Fresno Counties California Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index Page intentionally left blank SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS and MIDDLE AND SOUTH FORKS OF THE KINGS RIVER AND NORTH FORK OF THE KERN RIVER Tulare and Fresno Counties • California DRAFT GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE RIVER MANAGEMENT PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Volume 1: Purpose of and Need for Action / The Alternatives / Index This document presents five alternatives that are being considered for the management and use of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks over the next 15–20 years. The purpose of the Draft General Management Plan is to establish a vision for what Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks should be, including desired future conditions for natural and cultural resources, as well as for visitor experiences. The no-action alternative would continue current management direction, and it is the baseline for comparing the other alternatives (it was originally alternative B when the alternatives were first presented to the public in the winter of 2000). The preferred alternative is the National Park Service’s proposed action, and it would accommodate sustainable growth and visitor enjoyment, protect ecosystem diversity, and preserve basic character while adapting to changing user groups. Alternative A would emphasize natural ecosystems and biodiversity, with reduced use and development; alternative C would preserve the parks’ traditional character and retain the feel of yesteryear, with guided growth; and alternative D would preserve the basic character and adapt to changing user groups. The preferred alternative was developed by combining elements of other alternatives through a process known as “Choosing by Advantages.” It would bring additional benefits to the parks, and it would be the most cost-effective. This document also includes a comprehensive river management plan for the portions of the Middle and South Forks of the Kings River and the North Fork of the Kern River, which have been designated by Congress as components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. The purpose of the river management plan is to provide direction and overall guid ance on the management of lands and uses within the river corridors. The environmental impact statement, which has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, relates to both the general management plan and the comprehensive river management plan. The impacts of the alterna tives on natural and cultural resources, wild and scenic rivers, backcountry / wilderness, transportation, visitor experiences, private land and special use permits within the parks, park management and operations, and the socioeconomic environment are assessed. The environmentally preferred alternative is also identified. This Draft General Management Plan and Comprehensive River Management Plan / Environmental Impact Statement is presented in two volumes. The first volume includes the purpose of and need for action, plus the alternatives being consid ered and comparative tables of the alternatives and the impacts. The second volume includes the description of the affected environment, the environmental consequences, consultation and coordination, and the appendixes. For further information about this document contact: Park GMP Coordinator NPS GMP Team Leader Dr. David Graber, Senior Scientist Susan Spain, Landscape Architect Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks National Park Service – DSC 47050 Generals Highway 12795 W. Alameda Parkway Three Rivers, California 93271-9651 Denver, Colorado 80225-0287 (559) 565-3173 (303) 969-2280 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Comments must be received no later than 90 days after the publication of the notice of availability in the Federal Register. It is the National Park Service’s practice to make comments, including names and addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that their name and/or address be withheld from the public record, if it is stated prominently at the beginning of the comment. All submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be available for public inspection in their entirety. Anonymous comments may not be accepted. United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service Summary PURPOSE OF AND NEED ment of the national parks. The following are among the reasons why the plans are needed: FOR THE PLANS • Lack of a Comprehensive River Management This document presents five alternatives that are Plan — Boundaries must be established for being considered for the management and use of the river corridors, and appropriate classifi Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks over cations must be identified for each segment. the next 15–20 years. The purpose of the Draft For rivers that are eligible for the wild and General Management Plan is to provide scenic rivers system, no actions may be taken management direction to establish and achieve a that could adversely affect the values that vision for what Sequoia and Kings Canyon qualify them for inclusion in the system. National Parks should be, including desired • An Outdated Master Plan — The 1971 future conditions for natural and cultural Master Plan for Sequoia and Kings Canyon resources, as well as for visitor experiences. National Parks does not meet the require ments of a general management plan, and it This document also includes a comprehensive was developed without public involvement. river management plan for the portions of the Some actions are no longer appropriate. Middle and South Forks of the Kings River and the North Fork of the Kern River, which have • Management of Cultural Resources — Since been designated by Congress as components of the 1971 Master Plan was completed, a the national wild and scenic rivers system. The number of historic structures, districts, and purpose of the river management plan is to landscapes have been identified and inven provide direction and overall guidance on the toried. The general management plan must management of lands and uses within the river decide what should be done to properly care corridors. In accordance with the legislation, no for a cultural resource, and how cultural development or use of park lands that is incon resources fit into the overall scheme of park sistent with wild and scenic river designation management. While the National Park Ser may be undertaken. vice strives to preserve and protect cultural resources whenever possible, funding and The environmental impact statement, which has staffing are insufficient to preserve and been prepared in accordance with the National protect all cultural resources in the parks. Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), relates to • Unresolved Issues for Specific Developed both the general management plan and the Areas — Previous proposals may no longer comprehensive river management plan. The be desirable. For example, a 1980 proposal to impacts of the alternatives on natural and develop a 1,700-car parking garage at cultural resources, wild and scenic rivers, Wolverton to accommodate visitors to Giant wilderness, transportation, visitor experiences, Forest needs to be reexamined. private inholdings and special use permits within the parks, park management and operations, and • Special Use Permits on Public Land in the socioeconomic environment are assessed. Mineral King — In the Mineral King area of The environmentally preferred alternative is also Sequoia National Park private cabins are identified. allowed on public land through special use permits dating from 1978. While these per mits were to last only for the life of the Issues, Concerns, and Problems original permittee, some permittees or their families would like to continue the use of The need for the plans is to address issues, their cabins. concerns, and problems related to the manage iii SUMMARY • The Changing Context of the Parks in the are made that will not only protect park re­ Regional Ecosystem — Sequoia and Kings sources and values but also contribute to the Canyon National Parks were originally set protection and health of the ecosystem. aside to protect the sequoia groves. Adjacent lands possessing national park character have been added to the parks over the years. Yet THE ALTERNATIVES nearby land uses continue to affect park ecosystems. Management Prescriptions The Context for the Plans Management prescriptions are the heart of the general management plan. They are guidelines The alternatives being considered present a for achieving desired future conditions for both management vision and direction for Sequoia resources and visitor experiences, and they are and Kings Canyon National Parks, but some based on public ideas presented in the scoping considered actions could require legislative phases of this planning effort. action by Congress. For example, the desig­ nation of additional wild and scenic rivers would Management prescriptions are applied to geo­ require legislation. graphic areas, which are referred to as zones. The size of each zone varies by alternative. The context is also affected by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks, However, Went Unnoticed
    • D -1:>K 1.2!;EQUOJA-KING$ Ci\NYON NATIONAL PARKS History of the Parks "''' Evaluation of Historic Resources Detennination of Effect, DCP Prepared by • A. Berle Clemensen DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION TEA.'! NATIONAL PAP.K SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPAR'J'}fENT OF THE l~TERIOR DENVER, COLOR..\DO SEPTEffilER 1975 i i• Pl.EA5!: RETUl1" TO: B&WScans TEallillCAL INFORMAl!tll CfNIEil 0 ·l'i «coo,;- OOIVER Sf:RV!Gf Cf!fT£R llAT!ONAL PARK S.:.'Ma j , • BRIEF HISTORY OF SEQUOIA Spanish and Mexican Period The first white men, the Spanish, entered the San Joaquin Valley in 1772. They, however, only observed the Sierra Nevada mountains. None entered the high terrain where the giant Sequoia exist. Only one explorer came close to the Sierra Nevadas. In 1806 Ensign Gabriel Moraga, venturing into the foothills, crossed and named the Rio de la Santos Reyes (River of the Holy Kings) or Kings River. Americans in the San Joaquin Valley The first band of Americans entered the Valley in 1827 when Jedediah Smith and a group of fur traders traversed it from south to north. This journey ushered in the first American frontier as fifteen years of fur trapping followed. Still, none of these men reported sighting the giant trees. It was not until 1833 that members of the Joseph R. 1lalker expedition crossed the Sierra Nevadas and received credit as the first whites to See the Sequoia trees. These trees are presumed to form part of either the present M"rced or Tuolwnregroves. Others did not learn of their find since Walker's group failed to report their discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences
    United States Department of Giant Sequoia Agriculture Forest Service National Monument Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Environmental Impact Statement August 2010 Volume 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Chapter 4 - Environmental Consequences Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2 Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences Chapter 4 includes the environmental effects analysis. It is organized by resource area, in the same manner as Chapter 3. Effects are displayed for separate resource areas in terms of the direct, indirect, and cumulative effects associated with the six alternatives considered in detail. Effects can be neutral, beneficial, or adverse. This chapter also discusses the unavoidable adverse effects, the relationship between short-term uses and long-term productivity, and any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources. Environmental consequences form the scientific and analytical basis for comparison of the alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontispiece the 1864 Field Party of the California Geological Survey
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC ROAD GUIDE TO KINGS CANYON AND SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARKS, CENTRAL SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA By James G. Moore, Warren J. Nokleberg, and Thomas W. Sisson* Open-File Report 94-650 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. * Menlo Park, CA 94025 Frontispiece The 1864 field party of the California Geological Survey. From left to right: James T. Gardiner, Richard D. Cotter, William H. Brewer, and Clarence King. INTRODUCTION This field trip guide includes road logs for the three principal roadways on the west slope of the Sierra Nevada that are adjacent to, or pass through, parts of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (Figs. 1,2, 3). The roads include State Route 180 from Fresno to Cedar Grove in Kings Canyon Park (the Kings Canyon Highway), State Route 198 from Visalia to Sequoia Park ending near Grant Grove (the Generals Highway) and the Mineral King road (county route 375) from State Route 198 near Three Rivers to Mineral King. These roads provide a good overview of this part of the Sierra Nevada which lies in the middle of a 250 km span over which no roads completely cross the range. The Kings Canyon highway penetrates about three-quarters of the distance across the range and the State Route 198~Mineral King road traverses about one-half the distance (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Land Records Finding
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior FINDING AID PRIVATE LAND RECORDS 1903-1953 (bulk dates: 1914-1941) Prepared by Beth McDonald National Park Service Catalog Number: SEKI 22572 SEKI 22572 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Copyright and Restrictions …………………………………………………………..…ii History ………………………………………………………………………………….1 Scope and Content ……………………………………………………………………...2 File Unit Descriptions …………………………………………………………………..4 SEKI 22572 ii COPYRIGHT AND RESTRICTIONS The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. The various state privacy acts govern the use of materials that document private individuals, groups, and corporations. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a reproduction if the document does not infringe the privacy rights of an individual, group, or corporation. These specified conditions of authorized use include: • non-commercial and non-profit study, scholarship, or research, or teaching • criticism, commentary, or news reporting • as a NPS preservation or security copy • as a research copy for deposit in another institution If a user later uses a copy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," the user may be personally liable for copyright, privacy, or publicity infringement. This institution's permission to obtain a photographic, xerographic, digital, or other copy of a document doesn't indicate permission to publish, exhibit, perform, reproduce, sell,
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests
    Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Cultural Resources and Tribal and Native American Interests Signature: __________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14 th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Current Management Direction ................................................................................................................. 1 Types of Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Several Factors of Site on the Giant Sequoias }Ames D
    THE INFLUENCE OF SEVERAL FACTORS OF SITE ON THE GIANT SEQUOIAS }AMES D. BLICK San Diego State College The Giant Sequoias (Sequoia gigantea or Sequoiadendron giganteum) are among the more interesting members of the earth's B.ora. Their great age and size has attracted attention since the trees were first classified by John Lindley in 1853. Specimens of these trees have been planted and grow in over 50 differ­ ent localities in the world. However, they occur natively only in a narrow belt 220 miles long by about 10 miles wide between approximately 4400 and 8000 feet elevation on the western or windward slope of the Sierra Nevada in Central California. Within this belt the Sequoias occur in a series of about 70 groves, each definitely separated from the other (Figure 1 ) . The aggregate area usually included in the groves is slightly less than 36,000 acres. The distribution of groves, moreover, is not even. Except for 8 groves, the bulk is concentrated in the southernmost one-third of the belt in which they occur. These are: Redwood Mountain (RM),l Giant Forest (GF), Converse Basin (CB), and Windy Gulch (WG) between the King's River and the Middle Fork of the Kaweah; Garfield Grove (G) on the South Fork of the Kaweah; Mountain Home (MH) in the Tule River drainage. Groves on both ends of the Sequoia belt are small in area and contain relatively few mature giants. It was this very spotty and limited occurrance of the Giant Sequoias which led the author to investigate some aspects of their ecology in hopes of accounting for the present pattern of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks a Tool for Planning Stock-Supported Wilderness Trips
    Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior National Parks Stock Users Guide to the Wilderness of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks A tool for planning stock-supported wilderness trips SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS Wilderness Office 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, California 93271 559-565-3766 [email protected] www.nps.gov/seki/planyourvisit/wilderness.htm Revised May 6th, 2021 EAST CREEK .............................................................................. 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPHINX CREEK .......................................................................... 19 INTRO TO GUIDE ........................................................................ 2 ROARING RIVER ....................................................................... 19 LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE............................................................. 3 CLOUD CANYON ....................................................................... 20 STOCK USE & GRAZING RESTRICTIONS: DEADMAN CANYON ................................................................ 20 KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARK .................................... 4 SUGARLOAF AND FERGUSON CREEKS ................................. 21 SEQUOIA NATIONAL PARK ................................................ 6 CLOVER AND SILLIMAN CREEKS .......................................... 23 MINIMUM IMPACT STOCK USE ................................................ 8 LONE PINE CREEK .................................................................... 23 MINIMUM
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia Management in National Parks 1
    in: Aune, rnuip s., teen, coora. iyy*. rroceeainss oi me symposium on uian. sc^uiaa. '«'" ^.o^c ... the ecotystea and society; 1992 June 23-25; Visalia, CA. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station: 109-115. Objects or Ecosystems? PUB #267 Giant Sequoia Management in National Parks 1 David J. Parsons2 Abstract: Policies and programs aimed at protecting giant sequoia the effects of such external threats as air pollution and (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in the national parks of the Sierra Nevada projected human induced climadc change. The challenges have evolved from the protection of individual trees to the preservation of entire ecosystems. We now recognize that the long-term preservation of associated with assuring the long-term preservation of giant giant sequoia depends on our ability to minimize and mitigate the influences sequoia have become increasingly complicated as we have of human activities. National Park Service management strategies for giant learned more about the complexity and inter-relatedness of sequoia focus on the restoration of native ecosytem processes. This includes the greater Sierra Nevada ecosystem. the use of prescribed fire to simulate natural ignitions as well as the movement of visitor facilities out of the groves. Basic research is being This paper briefly reviews the history of giant sequoia carried out to improve our understanding of the factors infuencing giant management in the National Parks of the Sierra Nevada, sequoia reproduction, growth, and survival. Future management decisions emphasizing a gradually improved understanding of giant must recognize that giant sequoia are only part of a complex ecosystem; they sequoia ecosystems and how management has attempted to cannot be managed as objects in isolation of their surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment And
    Stony Creek and Montecito Sequoia Resorts Biological Assessment and Biological Evaluation for Sequoia National Forest Hume Lake Ranger District Improvement and Expansion Projects within Giant Sequoia National Monument Tulare County, California December 5, 2019 Prepared for: United States Forest Service Sequoia National Forest Hume Lake District District Ranger: Jeremy Dorsey 35860 East Kings Canyon Road Dunlap, CA 93621 Prepared by: Michelle McKenzie and Prairie Moore Natural Resources Management Corporation 1434 Third Street Eureka, CA 95501 Table of Contents I. Summary of Findings and Conclusions ........................................................................................ 1 II. Introduction, Background, and Project Understanding .............................................................. 2 Project Locations ......................................................................................................................... 3 Project Descriptions .................................................................................................................. 10 Biological Descriptions .............................................................................................................. 16 III. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 17 Pre-Field Review ........................................................................................................................ 17 Field Survey ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Summer Guide 2010
    NATIONAL SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON PARKS & SEQUOIA NATIONAL FORES T/ GIANT SEQUOIA NATIONAL MONUMENT LATE SUMMER GUIDE 2010 Crystal Cave / Free Activities • page 3 page 8 • Facilities & Ranger Programs in Sequoia Road Limits & Safety / Finding Gasoline • page 5 page 9 • Facilities & Programs in Kings Canyon & USFS Highlights & Shuttle in Sequoia Park • page 6 page 10 • Camping & Lodging / Bears & Your Food Highlights in Kings Canyon & USFS • page 7 page 12 • Expect Traffic Delays / Details & Park Map Discover • Protect • Connect Three verbs lie at the heart of a Classroom – helps to introduce great visit to your national parks: Sequoia and Kings Canyon to stu - discover the park for yourself, dents in some of the most under - connect to it on a personal level, served schools in the state. and choose to protect it! Rangers in the Classroom touches The number of people who can thousands of children each year. experience these parks this way is These parks lie just beyond their going up, thanks to a unique non- backyards, yet most of the kids have profit group. The Sequoia Parks never been here. Through curricu - Foundation raises funds for projects lum-based programs, they discover that make these parks easier to visit, a new world and start to see their via trails, exhibits, and classroom role in protecting it. They get excit - programs, to name just a few. ed about coming here with their A few examples of their projects: families and starting that personal • reworking trails to make them connection that can last a lifetime. more accessible for wheelchairs and Rangers travel as often as possi - anyone else who could use a ble to as many classrooms as they smoother walking surface; can – doing so in vans that were • support for trail-crew jobs that donated with help from the provide young people with experi - Foundation and other partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks
    COMPLIMENTARY $2.95 2017/2018 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS SEQUOIA & KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS ACTIVITIES • SIGHTSEEING • DINING • LODGING TRAILS • HISTORY • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS This summer, Yamaha launches a new Star motorcycle designed to help you journey further…than you ever thought possible. To see the road ahead, visit YamahaMotorsports.com/Journey-Further Some motorcycles shown with custom parts, accessories, paint and bodywork. Dress properly for your ride with a helmet, eye protection, long sleeves, long pants, gloves and boots. Yamaha and the Motorcycle Safety Foundation encourage you to ride safely and respect the environment. For further information regarding the MSF course, please call 1-800-446-9227. Do not drink and ride. It is illegal and dangerous. ©2017 Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. All rights reserved. BLEED AREA PARK REGULATIONS AND SAFETY TRIM SIZE WELCOME LIVE AREA Welcome to Sequoia and Kings Canyon you’ll find myriad fun activities in the parks! National Parks. The National Park Service (NPS), Dela- Zion National Park Located in central California, the parks ware North at Sequoia and Kings Canyon is the result of erosion, extend from the San Joaquin Valley foothills National Parks and Sequoia Parks Conser- to the eastern crest of the Sierra Nevada. vancy work together to ensure that your sedimentary uplift, and If trees could be kings, their royal realms visit is memorable. Stephanie Shinmachi. would be in these two adjoining parks. This American Park Network guide to 8 ⅞ Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks is testify to nature’s size, beauty and diversity: provided to help plan your visit.
    [Show full text]