DOCSLIB.ORG

International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes (Iccs)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes (Iccs) Statistical Commission Background document Forty-sixth session Available in English only 3 – 6 March 2015 Item 3(c) of the provisional agenda Crime statistics INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF CRIME FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES (ICCS) VERSION 1.0 February 2015 Prepared by United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Terrorism HomicideHijacking Trafficking in wildlife Burglary Assault Piracy Corruption Kidnapping 0207 Illicit enrichment 0308014 Smuggling of migrants Child pornography 0609 Sexual exploitation rty 05 Trafficking in persons Deprivation of libe Robbery Fraud Theft Forced labour Rape INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF CRIME FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES (ICCS) VERSION 1.0 February 2015 2013 Copyright © 2015, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Acknowledgments The development of the International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes was coordinated by the UNODC Research and Trend Analysis Branch (RAB), Division of Policy Analysis and Public Affairs (DPA), under the supervision of Jean-Luc Lemahieu, Director of DPA, Angela Me, Chief of RAB, and Chloé Carpentier, Chief of RAB Statistics and Surveys Section. Core team Research coordination and report preparation Enrico Bisogno Michael Jandl Lucia Motolinia Carballo Felix Reiterer Atsuki Takahashi Graphic design and layout: Suzanne Kunnen Kristina Kuttnig Editing: Jonathan Gibbons The International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes (ICCS) was developed using the “Principles and framework for an international classification of crimes for statistical purposes” produced by the UNECE-UNODC Joint Task Force on Crime Classification and endorsed by the Conference of European Statisticians in 2012. The ICCS was produced on the basis of the plan to finalize by 2015 an international classification of crime for statistical purposes, as approved by the Statistical Commission in its decision 44/110 and by the Economic and Social Council in its resolution 2013/37. Gratitude is expressed to all Member States, international organizations and individual experts who contributed to the development of the ICCS. The continuous support of the UNODC-INEGI Center of Excellence on Statistics on Governance, Public Safety, Victimization and Justice is gratefully acknowledged, as is the contribution of Steven Malby who developed the initial concept of the classification. UNODC would also like to thank the United Nations Statistics Division and the members of its Expert Group on International Statistical Classifications for their valuable comments and contributions during the peer-review process. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. Suggested citation: UNODC, International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes, Version 1.0 Comments on the report are welcome and can be sent to: Statistics and Surveys Section Research and Trend Analysis Branch Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime P.O. Box 500 1400 Vienna Austria E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: (+43) 1 26060 0 Disclaimer The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, Member States or contributory organizations, nor does it imply any endorsement. This document has not been formally edited. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © United Nations, February 2015. All rights reserved, worldwide. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issue. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE – INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 7 I. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 The nature and purpose of the International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes .............................. 7 The need for an international classification of crime ............................................................................................ 7 The challenge of developing an international classification of crime for a nationally defined event ................... 8 The process of building the international classification of crime .......................................................................... 9 II. PRINCIPLES USED IN THE ICCS ................................................................................................................................ 10 The definition of crime for the purposes of the ICCS ........................................................................................... 10 The unit of classification of the ICCS ................................................................................................................... 10 The application of the principles of statistical classification ............................................................................... 11 The criteria used to build the ICCS ...................................................................................................................... 12 Disaggregating variables as additional descriptors of criminal offences ........................................................... 14 Intentional homicide as a special case ................................................................................................................ 16 III. APPLICATION OF THE ICCS .................................................................................................................................... 18 Classifying offences for the purpose of the ICCS ................................................................................................. 18 The use of legal inclusions and exclusions in the ICCS ......................................................................................... 19 Additional disaggregating variables ................................................................................................................... 19 The relationship to other international classifications ........................................................................................ 21 PART TWO – BROAD AND DETAILED STRUCTURE ................................................................................................ 23 ANNEX 1: DATA COMPARABILITY, REPORTING RATES AND COUNTING RULES ........................................................................... 106 Defining and classifying crime .......................................................................................................................... 106 Reporting and detecting crime ......................................................................................................................... 106 Recording and counting crime .......................................................................................................................... 106 ANNEX 2 .................................................................................................................................................................. 108 5 6 Part One – Introduction I. Overview The nature and purpose of the International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes The International Classification of Crime for Statistical Purposes (ICCS) is a classification of criminal offences which is based on internationally agreed concepts, definitions and principles in order to enhance the consistency and international comparability of crime statistics, and improve analytical capabilities at both the national and international levels.1 The ICCS provides a framework for the systematic production and comparison of statistical data across different criminal justice institutions and jurisdictions. This means that the ICCS is applicable to all forms of crime data, whatever the stage of the criminal justice process (police, prosecution, conviction, imprisonment) at which they are collected, as well as to data collected in crime victimization surveys. At the international level, the ICCS improves the comparability of crime data between countries. Standardized concepts and definitions allow for the systematic collection, analysis and dissemination of data, and also respond to the demand for in-depth research and analysis of transnational crime. At the national level, the ICCS can be used as a model to provide structure and organize statistical data that are often produced according to legal rather than analytical categories. Moreover, the ICCS can harmonize data across domestic criminal justice institutions (police, prosecutions, courts, prisons) and across different data sources (administrative records and statistical surveys).2 Likewise, the ICCS can be used as a tool to standardize data from sub-national entities that may have different statistical systems or legal frameworks. The need for an international classification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for the Forensic Analysis of Drugs Facilitating Sexual Assault and Other Criminal Acts
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Guidelines for the Forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts United Nations publication Printed in Austria ST/NAR/45 *1186331*V.11-86331—December 2011 —300 Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library, iStock.com/Abel Mitja Varela Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Guidelines for the forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 ST/NAR/45 © United Nations, December 2011. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. List of abbreviations . v Acknowledgements .......................................... vii 1. Introduction............................................. 1 1.1. Background ........................................ 1 1.2. Purpose and scope of the manual ...................... 2 2. Investigative and analytical challenges ....................... 5 3 Evidence collection ...................................... 9 3.1. Evidence collection kits .............................. 9 3.2. Sample transfer and storage........................... 10 3.3. Biological samples and sampling ...................... 11 3.4. Other samples ...................................... 12 4. Analytical considerations .................................. 13 4.1. Substances encountered in DFSA and other DFC cases .... 13 4.2. Procedures and analytical strategy...................... 14 4.3. Analytical methodology .............................. 15 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Environmental Crime
    A GROWING THREAT TO NATURAL RESOURCES, THE RISE OF PEACE, DEVELOPMENT AND SECURITY ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME A UNEP--INTERPOL RAPID RESPONSE ASSESSMENT 1 1 Nellemann, C. (Editor in Chief); Henriksen, R., Kreilhuber, A., Stewart, D., Kotsovou, M., Raxter, P., Mrema, E., and Barrat, S. (Eds). 2016. The Rise of Environ mental Crime – A Growing Threat To Natural Resources Peace, Development And Security. A UNEP- INTERPOL Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme and RHIPTO Rapid Response–Norwegian Center for Global Analyses, www.rhipto.org ISBN 978-82-690434-0-2 (print) ISBN 978-82-690434-1-9 (pdf) UNEP promotes Printed by UNEP environmentally sound practices Disclaimer globally and in its own activities. This The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or publication is printed on fully recycled paper, policies of UNEP or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any FSC certified, post-consumer waste and chlorine- opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organiza- free. Inks are vegetable-based and coatings are water- tions concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, com- pany or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its based. UNEP’s distribution policy aims to reduce its frontiers or boundaries. carbon footprint. 2 A UNEP--INTERPOL RAPID RESPONSE ASSESSMENT A GROWING THREAT TO NATURAL RESOURCES, THE RISE OF PEACE, DEVELOPMENT AND SECURITY ENVIRONMENTAL CRIME Editorial Team Christian Nellemann (Editor in Chief) Rune Henriksen Arnold Kreilhuber Davyth Stewart Maria Kotsovou Patricia Raxter Elizabeth Mrema Sam Barrat Cartography Riccardo Pravettoni Philippe Rekacewicz (figure 11) Emmanuelle Bournay (figure 14) 2 3 Foreword The world is being dredged of its natural resources, with much of what we rely on for our livelihoods at risk from a new threat: environmental crime.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 Compare Criminal Behaviour and Deviance
    1.1 Compare criminal behaviour and Year 12/Unit 2. Criminology deviance AC 1.1 Defining deviance Acts that are criminal Key Vocabulary 1 Behaviour that is Such as heroically risking your own 1 Summary Less serious e.g. speeding. Tried by 1 Norms Specific rules or socially accepted unusual and good life to save someone else. offences magistrates. standards that govern behaviour in particular situations. 2 Behaviour that is Such as talking to the trees in the 2 Indictable More serious e.g. rape/murder. Tried in unusual and park, or hoarding huge quantities of offences crown court with jury. More severe 2 Values General principles or guidelines for eccentric old newspapers. sentences. how we should live our lives. 3 Behaviour that is Such as physically attacking 3 Violence E.g. murder, manslaughter, assault 3 Moral A set of basic rules, values and unusual and bad or someone for no reason. against the codes prinicples, held by an individual, group, disapproved of person organisation or society as a whole. 4 Sexual E.g. rape, sex trafficking, grooming. 4 Formal Punishments for breaking formal offences Defining Criminal behaviour sanction written rules or laws. Imposed by Offences official bodies e.g. courts, schools etc. Legal Any action forbidden by criminal law – 5 E.g. burglary, theft, robbery. 1 against definition 5 Informal Disapproval shown to a person for usually involves actus rea and mens rea property sanction breaking unwritten rules, such as telling 2 Social This includes consideration of differing 6 Fraud and E.g. frauds by company directors, benefit off or ignoring them.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Law: Conspiracy to Defraud
    CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD LAW COMMISSION LAW COM No 228 The Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 228) CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD Item 5 of the Fourth Programme of Law Reform: Criminal Law Laid before Parliament bj the Lord High Chancellor pursuant to sc :tion 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 December 1994 LONDON: 11 HMSO E10.85 net The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Brooke, Chairman Professor Andrew Burrows Miss Diana Faber Mr Charles Harpum Mr Stephen Silber QC The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London, WClN 2BQ. 11 LAW COMMISSION CRIMINAL LAW: CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: INTRODUCTION 1.1 1 A. Background to the report 1. Our work on conspiracy generally 1.2 1 2. Restrictions on charging conspiracy to defraud following the Criminal Law Act 1977 1.8 3 3. The Roskill Report 1.10 4 4. The statutory reversal of Ayres 1.11 4 5. Law Commission Working Paper No 104 1.12 5 6. Developments in the law after publication of Working Paper No 104 1.13 6 7. Our subsequent work on the project 1.14 6 B. A general review of dishonesty offences 1.16 7 C. Summary of our conclusions 1.20 9 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Code 2003.Pmd 273 11/27/2004, 12:35 PM 274 No
    273 No. 9 ] Criminal Code [2004. SAINT LUCIA ______ No. 9 of 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER ONE General Provisions PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Application of Code 4. General construction of Code 5. Common law procedure to apply where necessary 6. Interpretation PART II JUSTIFICATIONS AND EXCUSES 7. Claim of right 8. Consent by deceit or duress void 9. Consent void by incapacity 10. Consent by mistake of fact 11. Consent by exercise of undue authority 12. Consent by person in authority not given in good faith 13. Exercise of authority 14. Explanation of authority 15. Invalid consent not prejudicial 16. Extent of justification 17. Consent to fight cannot justify harm 18. Consent to killing unjustifiable 19. Consent to harm or wound 20. Medical or surgical treatment must be proper 21. Medical or surgical or other force to minors or others in custody 22. Use of force, where person unable to consent 23. Revocation annuls consent 24. Ignorance or mistake of fact criminal code 2003.pmd 273 11/27/2004, 12:35 PM 274 No. 9 ] Criminal Code [2004. 25. Ignorance of law no excuse 26. Age of criminal responsibility 27. Presumption of mental disorder 28. Intoxication, when an excuse 29. Aider may justify same force as person aided 30. Arrest with or without process for crime 31. Arrest, etc., other than for indictable offence 32. Bona fide assistant and correctional officer 33. Bona fide execution of defective warrant or process 34. Reasonable use of force in self-defence 35. Defence of property, possession of right 36.
    [Show full text]
  • Living in a World of Violence: an Introduction to the Gang Phenomenon
    LEGAL AND PROTECTION POLICY RESEARCH SERIES Living in a World of Violence: An Introduction to the Gang Phenomenon Michael Boulton Social Policy Officer, UNICEF, Malawi DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION July 2011 PPLA/2011/07 PROTECTION POLICY AND GENERAL LEGAL ADVICE DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES CP 2500, 1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.unhcr.org This paper was prepared, while the author was a consultant at UNHCR, as an internal background note for the UNHCR’s Guidance Note on Refugee Claims Relating to Victims of Organized Gangs , 31 March 2010, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4bb21fa02.html , which provides a detailed legal analysis of the application of the 1951 Convention and other relevant instruments in the context of gang-related violence. The paper has benefited from the comments and contributions from Dr. Thomas Boerman. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the UN or UNHCR. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author. The author may be contacted at [email protected]. This report may be freely quoted, cited and copied for academic, educational or other non-commercial purposes without prior permission from UNHCR, provided that the source is acknowledged. The report is available online at http://www.unhcr.org/protect . © United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 2011 2 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gang Violence As Armed Conflict: a New Perspective on El Salvador
    POLICY BRIEF Gang Violence as Armed Conflict: A New Perspective on El Salvador Anna Applebaum and Briana Mawby | November 2018 PEACE & SECURITY Gang violence is most often considered a criminal rather than a conflict issue, which limits the international community’s willingness to mitigate the conflict or provide humanitarian aid. However, the disruption of daily life caused by widespread gang violence is increasingly similar to experiences of war, including limited freedom of movement and high numbers of civilian casualties. High levels of violence lead to significant migration flows and displacement, as has been seen in individuals fleeing from Syria to Europe and from Central America’s Northern Triangle (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) to the United States. This note, which focuses on El Salvador, highlights the scale and nature of gang violence and points to the ways in which the Women, Peace, and Security agenda can help to strengthen prevention and responses. Introduction Many countries currently considered “at peace” experience high levels of armed violence and insecurity. In 2017, only two of the five countries with the world’s highest reported rates of violent death were experiencing active armed conflict: Syria and Afghanistan. The three remaining countries—El Salvador, Venezuela, and Honduras—all face significant political, economic, and social instability and experience high levels of gang violence.1 The disruption of daily life caused by widespread gang violence is increasingly similar to experiences of war, including limited freedom of movement and high numbers of civilian casualties. High levels of violence also lead to significant migration flows and displacement, as has been seen in individuals fleeing from Syria to Europe and from Central America’s Northern Triangle (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) to the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart Dingle YEAR of CALL: 2011
    Stuart Dingle YEAR OF CALL: 2011 EXPERTISE Stuart undertakes criminal defence and prosecution work. He has defended in a wide range of cases, including section 18 GBHs, Fraud, trading standards infringements, aggravated burglaries, knifepoint robberies, violent disorder, indecent images, and violence including threats to kill. Stuart has a successful appellate practice and has had his cases referenced in Blackstones. Stuart defends in POCA proceedings and complex VAT/excise frauds. Stuart has particular experience of football disorder and defending against the imposition of Football Banning Orders. As well as representing private individuals Stuart has appeared on behalf of many fan support groups and travels across the country to represent fans in both Criminal cases and civil orders. Before his independent practice Stuart worked as a litigator and clerk, working on several multi-handed murders. Stuart has particular experience of considering pathological evidence. Stuart has successfully prosecuted and defended in a number of cases involving expert evidence and the consideration and cross examining of experts, including private driving, cell site, and medical causation evidence. Stuart is currently a Level 2 Panel Advocate for the CPS, and his casework includes specialist experience in domestic violence prosecution and advice. Stuart is also regularly instructed by the serious fraud division to deal with revenue, benefit and complex fraud cases. Stuart has experience advancing special hardship arguments to retain driving licences and has been sought to give advice on a variety of matters relating to driving law. In addition to crime and associated matters, Stuart also regular appears for quasi-criminal and regulatory matters including contested Football Banning Orders and Sexual Risk Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Colin Banham Crime
    Colin Banham Crime Colin has over 17 years’ experience both defending and prosecuting in the criminal courts. He has been instructed as a leading Junior, led Junior and acting alone in serious and complex criminal allegations. He regularly defends and prosecutes cases including aggravated burglary, grievous bodily harm with intent, violent disorder, drugs conspiracies, robbery and large-scale fraud. Colin is graded by the CPS as a Level 4 Prosecutor and is a member of the Specialist Panels for Fraud (including fiscal fraud) and Serious Year of Call: 1999 Crime (including terrorism). Clerks Colin has extensive experience in serious road traffic offences. He is regularly instructed by insurers to represent defendants, particularly in Senior Practice Manager cases involving serious injury with underlying civil litigation. He accepts Andrew Trotter private instructions in all forms of motoring offences either directly or by referral. Chief Executive & Director of Clerking RECENT CASES Tony McDaid R v RS, DB & KM (2016): Instructed by the NCA in a multi-handed Contact a Clerk conspiracy to supply Class A drugs amounting to £50.4m. The case Tel: +44 (0) 845 210 5555 was conducted against a silk and two leading juniors. Fax: +44 (0) 121 606 1501 [email protected] R v KS-R (2016): Case involving allegations of causing serious injury by dangerous driving. R v CP (2016): Successfully defending a middle-aged lady alleged to have defrauded a pension scheme. R v ZN (2016): Defending a male alleged to have conspired to import a large amount of Khat into the UK. R v AB, PB & AE (2016): Prosecuting an allegation of conspiracy to supply cannabis amounting to almost £500,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Offences Against Public Order
    Ormerod & Laird: Smith, Hogan, and Ormerod's Criminal Law, 15th edition 31 Offences against public order 31.1 The Public Order Act 1986 31.1.1 Background The Public Order Act 1986 replaced the ancient common law offences of riot, rout, unlawful assembly and affray and some statutory offences relating to public order1 with new offences. These are, in descending order of gravity: s 1 riot; s 2 violent disorder; and, s 3 affray. In addition to these more serious offences, the Act created lower level offences: s 4 (threatening, abusive or insulting conduct intended, or likely, to provoke violence or cause fear of violence); s 5 (threatening or abusive conduct likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress); and s 4A (threatening, abusive or insulting conduct intentionally causing harassment, alarm 1 For the law before the 1986 Act, see the 5th edition of this book, Ch 20; for the background to the 1986 Act, see the Home Office, Review of the Public Order Act and Related Legislation (1980) Cmnd 7891 and Law Com Working Paper No 82 (1982) and LC 123, Offences Relating to Public Disorder (1983). For detailed studies of the new law at the time it was enacted, see R Card, Public Order: The New Law (1987) and ATH Smith, Offences against Public Order (1987). For a more recent detailed study of the offences, see P Thornton et al, The Law of Public Order and Protest (2010). © Oxford University Press, 2018. Ormerod & Laird: Smith, Hogan, and Ormerod's Criminal Law, 15th edition or distress) as added by subsequent legislation.2 These latter offences have become very heavily used.
    [Show full text]
  • Halifax Street Checks Report
    HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA: STREET CHECKS REPORT March 2019 Researched and written for NS Human Rights Commission by Dr. Scot Wortley University of Toronto Centre for Criminology & Sociolegal Studies Part A: Introduction..................................................................1 Part B: Community Consultations........................................2 Part C: Community Survey...................................................24 Part D: Police Consultations................................................76 Part E: An Analysis of Official Street Check Data.........101 Part F: Recommendations.................................................156 PART A: INTRODUCTION On April 12th, 1998, Kirk Johnson, a well-known professional boxer and Olympian from North Preston, Nova Scotia, was pursued in his vehicle, on a local highway, by a Constable from the Halifax Regional Police Service. Mr. Johnson was eventually pulled over at a shopping plaza in Dartmouth. The constable asked for proof of insurance and vehicle registration for Johnson’s Ford Mustang and was not satisfied with the documents offered. The officer then ticketed the driver, and ordered the car towed. In fact, Mr. Johnson’s documentation was valid under Texas law. The next day an unidentified police official determined that the seizure and towing of Mr. Johnson’s vehicle had been erroneous and ordered the car released. This case ultimately resulted in Mr. Johnson filing a compliant with the Nova Scotia Human Right’s Commission alleging racial bias and/or racial profiling by the Halifax Regional Police Service (HRP). A Human Rights Tribunal was eventually conducted, and the case was decided in December 2003 (Girard 2003). One of the remedies suggested in the Tribunal’s decision was that the Halifax Regional Police consider a study of the impact of race on traffic stops: What I would like is a proposal for how information could be provided on the role of race in traffic stops by the Halifax Regional Police.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of STREET GANGS in the UNITED STATES By: James C
    Bureau of Justice Assistance U.S. Department of Justice NATIO N AL GA ng CE N TER BULLETI N No. 4 May 2010 HISTORY OF STREET GANGS IN THE UNITED STATES By: James C. Howell and John P. Moore Introduction The first active gangs in Western civilization were reported characteristics of gangs in their respective regions. by Pike (1873, pp. 276–277), a widely respected chronicler Therefore, an understanding of regional influences of British crime. He documented the existence of gangs of should help illuminate key features of gangs that operate highway robbers in England during the 17th century, and in these particular areas of the United States. he speculates that similar gangs might well have existed in our mother country much earlier, perhaps as early as Gang emergence in the Northeast and Midwest was the 14th or even the 12th century. But it does not appear fueled by immigration and poverty, first by two waves that these gangs had the features of modern-day, serious of poor, largely white families from Europe. Seeking a street gangs.1 More structured gangs did not appear better life, the early immigrant groups mainly settled in until the early 1600s, when London was “terrorized by a urban areas and formed communities to join each other series of organized gangs calling themselves the Mims, in the economic struggle. Unfortunately, they had few Hectors, Bugles, Dead Boys … who found amusement in marketable skills. Difficulties in finding work and a place breaking windows, [and] demolishing taverns, [and they] to live and adjusting to urban life were equally common also fought pitched battles among themselves dressed among the European immigrants.
    [Show full text]